Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Dentin Sensitivity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

A clinical evaluation of the effects of a periodontal scaling gel.

This research evaluated the in vivo effects of a periodontal scaling gel used in routine prophylaxis. Fifteen adult patients with moderate to heavy calculus were selected for full mouth hand scaling and prophylaxis using a split mouth design, employing SofScale Scaling Gel in experimental quadrants. Patients and operators were asked to evaluate differences between control and treated quadrants. The following parameters were evaluated during and after treatment: Gingival effects, tooth sensitivity, ease of calculus removal, and overall patient comfort. In addition pre- and post-treatment tooth surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy using a replicate technique. No tooth sensitivity or soft tissue irritation was observed in any control or experimental quadrants. Calculus removal was independently judged by operators to be easier in the gel treated quadrants when compared to untreated control quadrants. Scanning electron microscopy revealed cleaner enamel and root surfaces with no obvious morphological changes in mineralized tissues. The results of this study demonstrate the safety of the scaling gel and the increased effectiveness of calculus removal during hand scaling of teeth treated with this gel.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Risk factors for developing tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation associated with nightguard vital bleaching.

The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors in the development of tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation associated with the nightguard vital bleaching technique. The potential risk factors evaluated (sex, age, reported allergy, whitening solution, number of times the solution was changed daily [its usage pattern], and dental arch) were collected from the daily log form turned in by each of the 64 participants after completion of the 6-week lightening process. Also evaluated for each participant, from color slides, were tooth characteristics such as gingival recession, defective restorations, abfraction lesions, enamel-cementum abrasion, etc, and reported side effects. The generalized Mantel-Haenszel statistic was used to assess the association between the potential risk factors and the development of tooth sensitivity and/or gingival irritation. No statistical relationship existed between age, sex, allergy, tooth characteristics, or the dental arch lightened and the development of side effects. Initially, a statistically significant association existed between side effects and the whitening solution used. However, when the analysis was controlled for usage pattern, this relationship disappeared. Patients who changed the whitening solution more than once a day reported statistically significantly more side effects than did those who did not change the whitening solution during their usage time.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1992

Role of intradental A- and C-type nerve fibres in dental pain mechanisms.

The arousal of the two components of pain (the first rapid or sharp pain and the second dull pain) are considered to be related to activation of A delta- and C-type nociceptive primary afferents, respectively. The same dichotomy of pain sensations may also exist in teeth, although due to the short distance between the site of stimulation and the brain the two sensations might not be as clearly separated as in stimulation of, for example, the extremities. The sensations evoked by stimulation of human teeth vary according to the type of the stimuli applied. Low-intensity electrical stimulation is able to induce non-painful (prepain) sensations. At high current intensities pain is evoked. Drilling, probing and air-drying of exposed dentin induce only pain. Most studies also indicate that thermal stimulation only induces painful sensations. The quality of dental pain can vary. Typically, dentinal stimulation of teeth with healthy pulps induces sharp pain. On the other hand intense heat stimulation can result in dull pain which radiates to a wider area of the face and jaws. This component of the stimulus-induced pain seems to share some characteristics of toothache associated with painful pulpitis. Single fibre recordings of intradental nerve activity in experimental animals have shown that in addition to A-fibres a considerable number of C-type primary afferents innervate the dental pulp. This is in accordance with the results of neuroanatomical studies, which indicate that 70-80% of pulpal axons in human, monkey, dog, and cat teeth are unmyelinated. Intradental A- and C-fibre groups seem to be functionally different and can be activated separately by certain external stimuli. Comparison of the response characteristics of the pulp nerve fibres and the sensations induced from human teeth indicate that: 1) A-fibres are responsible for the sensitivity of dentine and thus for the mediation of the sharp pain induced by dentinal stimulation, 2) Prepain sensations induced by electrical stimulation result from activation of the lowest threshold A-fibres some of which can be classified as A beta-fibres according to their conduction velocities. Comparison of the responses of the A beta- and A delta-fibres indicate that they belong to the same functional group, 3) Intradental C-fibres are activated only if the external stimuli reach the pulp proper. Their activation may contribute to the dull pain induced by intense thermal stimulation of the tooth and to that associated with pulpal inflammation.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in posterior cavities.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the four-year performance of a highly filled resin composite in Class II and Class I cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of 63 participants received at least one pair of restorations of the same size: one resin composite (Tetric Ceram) and one calcium aluminate cement. Seventy-one pairs were placed. The restorations were evaluated clinically according to slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline, after 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years. At 3 years, the calcium aluminate cement material showed an inacceptable clinical cumulative failure frequency of 57% and its evaluation was discontinued. RESULTS: Postoperative sensitivity was reported for 5 restorations (2 resin composite, 3 calcium aluminate cement). At 4 years, a cumulative failure frequency of 7.5% was observed for the resin composite material. Reasons for failure were partial material fracture (2), cusp fracture (2) and endodontic treatment (1). CONCLUSION: An annual failure rate of 1.9% for the resin composite material provided a good clinical performance during the 4-year period, which fulfills the ADA criteria for posterior resin composite materials.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Assuaging postoperative effects of periodontal surgery.

Responding to the patient's uncomfortable reaction following certain periodontal surgery procedures, notably the sensitivity to temperature and touch, has been a source of frustration to both the practitioner performing the surgery as well as the patient. This case demonstrates the placement of an easily applied desensitizing paste (Duraphat) at the time of surgery, which enables the patient to avoid uncomfortable sensitivity after the dressing has been removed and allows the patient to return to good oral hygiene practices quickly, thereby avoiding new accumulation of bacteria. It also prevents further periodontal destruction, which is the purpose of the periodontal treatment. This presentation and diagrammatic explanation demonstrate placing this topical paste during the surgery, just before suturing. This particular paste is easy to place, and ease of placement is not inhibited by moisture in the affected area. The desensitizing effect for the immediate postoperative period provides comfort for the patient and helps to maintain trust between the dentist and the patient.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: efficiency and short-term effectiveness.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and short-term effectiveness of the morphology and function of direct and indirect cusp-replacing resin composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 94 patients, 106 cusp-replacing restorations for maxillary premolars were fabricated to restore Class II caries lesions with 1 cusp missing. Fifty-four direct (Clearfil AP-X) and 52 indirect (Estenia) resin composite restorations were placed following a strict protocol. The treatment technique and operator were assigned randomly. Treatment time was recorded for all restorations. One-month postoperative evaluation included assessment of postoperative sensitivity and presence of occlusal and proximal contacts. RESULTS: Treatment time for the indirect technique (68 +/- 17 min) was longer than for the direct technique (45 +/- 13 min). Regression analysis revealed that the restorative method, operator, and location of the preparation outline had a statistically significant effect on the total treatment time. Occlusal contacts were observed in 94% of the direct restorations and in 98% of the indirect restorations (chi-square, P>.05). Mesial proximal contacts were present in 98% of the direct and in 97% of the indirect restorations (chi-square, P > .05). Distal contacts were present in 100% of the restorations for both techniques. Postoperative sensitivity within 1 week posttreatment was reported for 11% of the direct restorations and for 13% of the indirect restorations, but decreased to 4% and 6%, respectively, after 1 month (chi-square, P > .05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that in the short term, both direct and indirect adhesive techniques are adequate to restore the morphology and function of premolars presenting with Class II caries lesions and a missing cusp.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A retrospective study of pulpal response in vital adult teeth prepared for complete coverage restorations at ultrahigh speed using only air coolant.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The dental literature has shown a 3% to 25% pulpal necrosis rate as a result of tooth preparation for complete coverage restorations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine clinical and radiographic records for evidence of pulpal necrosis in teeth prepared for complete coverage restorations at ultrahigh speed when air coolant alone was used. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 1847 teeth in this study (182 fixed partial denture abutment teeth and 1665 single teeth restored with 21 all-ceramic, 1095 metal-ceramic, and 731 all-metal restorations) were prepared with diamond instruments (burs) in a sweeping or painting motion with the use of light pressure (1-3 oz) at ultrahigh speed with air coolant alone from the handpiece. New burs were used for each patient and then discarded. Each bur was used on no more than 4 teeth. All impressions were made with reversible hydrocolloid. Provisional restorations were fabricated on a stone cast and cemented with zinc oxide and eugenol cement. Provisional restorations were removed at 3 to 4 weeks and definitive restorations placed. Between 1970 and 1989, 6 different luting agents (zinc phosphate, resin, glass ionomer, ortho-ethoxybenzoic acid, carboxylate, and polycarboxylate) were used to place definitive restorations. All patients were questioned about symptoms of tooth sensitivity, tenderness, or pain at their regular (4- to 6-month) hygiene recall appointments. Success was defined as any definitively restored teeth that remained free of radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency and clinical signs and symptoms of pulpal sensitivity or pain recorded in the clinical record. The results were compared with rates of pulpal necrosis for teeth prepared with water coolant as reported in the dental literature published between 1970 and 1997. RESULTS: Of 638 teeth prepared between 1970 and 1979, the pulpal necrosis rate was 2.19% (14 teeth: 12 single teeth and 2 fixed partial denture abutment teeth) (97.81% success rate). Of 1209 teeth prepared between 1980 and 1989, the pulpal necrosis rate was 0.66% (8 teeth: 7 single crown teeth and 1 partial denture abutment tooth) (99.34% success rate). Of 1825 teeth prepared between 1970 and 1989, radiographic evidence of pulpal necrosis was found in 0% (100% success rate). No clinical symptoms of pain or sensitivity were recorded in the patient records for the surviving teeth during the time period of this study, which was conducted in May 2001. No crowns were repaired or removed as a result of carious lesions. No higher incidence of pulpal necrosis relative to the type of luting agent was observed. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, it is suggested that tooth reduction procedures can be completed with minimal damage to the pulp when only air coolant from the dental handpiece is used.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Clinical response of three whitening products having different peroxide delivery: comparison of tray, paint-on gel, and dentifrice.

OBJECTIVE: Comparative clinical research was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three peroxide-containing tooth whitening products having different peroxide delivery. METHODOLOGY: A total of 43 healthy adults who met entrance criteria were randomly assigned to either a dual-phase, anticavity, 1% hydrogen peroxide dentifrice with a manganese gluconate activator, an 18% carbamide peroxide paint-on gel, or a 5% carbamide peroxide professional custom tray system. Following manufacturer's instructions, the activated dentifrice was used at least twice daily for two minutes, while the paint-on gel was applied twice daily. The custom tray, a barrier system and the experimental control for this study, was worn continuously for six to eight hours daily. Tooth color (L*a*b*) was measured on the maxillary anterior teeth from standard digital images, while safety was assessed from examination and subject report. RESULTS: At Day 15, the custom tray group had a significant (p < 0.002) reduction in yellowness and increased lightness, with adjusted mean (SE) deltab* of -1.83 (0.210) and deltaL* of 1.45 (0.292). The custom tray group experienced on average greater color improvement compared to either the paint-on gel or activated peroxide whitening dentifrice, differing significantly (p < 0.01) from either of the barrier-free systems with respect to deltab*, deltaL*, deltaE*, and deltaW*. In comparison, 14-days' use of the paint-on gel and activated dentifrice did not result in significant (p > 0.10) color improvements from baseline for deltab*, deltaL*, or deltaW*, with these two barrier-free systems not differing significantly (p > 0.26) with respect to any individual or composite color parameters. Tooth sensitivity and oral irritation were the most common safety findings in the tray and dentifrice groups (there were no adverse events in the paint-on group), and no subject discontinued treatment early because of a treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSION: In head-to-head 14-day testing, a low concentration (5% carbamide peroxide) barrier-based tray system yielded superior tooth color improvement compared to two barrier-free delivery systems-an 18% carbamide peroxide paint-on gel and a 1% hydrogen peroxide dentifrice with a metal activator.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

The treatment of hypersensitive cervical abrasion cavities using ASPA cement.

This study evaluated the usefulness of the alumino-silicate polyacrylate (ASPA) or glass ionomer cement in the treatment of hypersensitive cervical abrasion cavities. Various methods of treatment of hypersensitive cervical abrasion cavities have been described, and all these methods have their disadvantages. The ASPA cement was used to treat non-carious hypersensitive cervical abrasion cavities in 189 teeth from fifty-eight adult patients. The patients were followed-up for periods ranging from 6-15 months. Of the 189 treated teeth, the ASPA restoration was intact in 163 or 86.2%. Seventeen teeth or 9.0% had partial loss of the restorations and nine or 4.8% had complete loss of restorations. With regard to symptoms, 176 or 93.1% of the treated teeth were no longer sensitive to stimuli from the oral cavity following placement of the ASPA restoration. Of the fifty-eight patients, fifty-two or 89.7% were completely relieved of all symptoms. Of the remaining teeth eleven or 5.8% reported a reduction in the severity of the symptoms. Only one patient, with both restorations lost, reported no improvement. No case of pulpal death was recorded, and there was no evidence of caries at the margin of any of the restorations. The results indicate that the method is effective, and it has some distinct advantages over existing methods of treatment of these cavities.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations.

BACKGROUND: The CEREC system (Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) is marking its 20th year of clinical service. The author reviews the literature on the effectiveness of this chairside CAD/CAM system. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The author identified and reviewed clinical studies from 1985 through 2006 that included CEREC-generated inlays, onlays or crowns. These studies were conducted in both private practice and university settings. The author summarized the findings as they relate to postoperative sensitivity, restoration fracture, color match, margin adaptation and clinical longevity. RESULTS: Although postoperative sensitivity was reported, it was due to mainly occlusal interferences. Long-term postoperative sensitivity was not a reported problem. Similar to other ceramic restorations, restoration fracture is the primary mode of failure for CEREC-generated restorations. Although margin wear is detected consistently, consequences of the wear leading to restoration failure were reported rarely. The survival probability of CEREC-generated restorations was reported to be approximately 97 percent for five years and 90 percent for 10 years. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The low rate of restoration fracture and long-term clinical survivability document the effectiveness of the CEREC system as a dependable, esthetic restorative option for patients.

Ceramics↗
PubMedDate not supplied

2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of alternative treatments for replacing defective amalgam restorations through a prospective longitudinal cohort clinical study. METHODS: Forty-five patients aged 21 through 77 (mean=56) years with 113 defective amalgam restorations, which were independently diagnosed during treatment planning, participated in the study. These patients were assigned to 5 treatment groups: repair (n=20), sealing of defective margins (n=23), refurbishing (n=23), replacement (n=23) and no-treatment (n=24). The replacement and no-treatment groups served as comparison groups and received random assignment. Two clinicians examined the restorations (n=113) prior to and after the assigned treatment and at subsequent recalls, using a modified Ryge Criteria that included marginal adaptation, anatomy, contact, post-operative sensitivity and secondary caries. RESULTS: At 1- and 2-year recalls, 79 (70%) and 74 (65%) restorations were examined. Kruskal-Wallis Test showed significant differences for marginal adaptation and anatomic form for both 1- and 2- year recall exams (p<.05). The repair and replacement groups had significant differences when compared to the no-treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Defective restorations that have a Bravo rating for clinical characteristics other than marginal integrity and anatomical form do not need to be immediately replaced.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Oral disease, impairment, and illness: congruence between clinical and questionnaire findings.

In 1992 a questionnaire was sent to 50-year-olds in two Swedish counties. These self-report data were compared with clinical observations with regard to number of teeth, removable dentures, caries, and periodontitis. Complete information from both data sources was obtained for 1041 persons. The relevant questionnaire item explained 71% of the missing tooth variance. An agreement of 0.91 (Cohen's kappa) was obtained for removable dentures. A question about problems in opening the mouth differentiated clearly with regard to measured mouth opening ability. Toothache and tooth sensitivity were reported with 95% probability when having 22 decayed teeth and with 46% when there were no decayed teeth (58% correctly predicted). Two teeth with pockets > or = 6 mm gave 5% probability and 22 such teeth gave 39% probability of reporting migration of front teeth. The main conclusion from this study is that there is good correspondence between subjective self-reports and clinical findings, especially for those conditions that are relatively easy for the patient to observe, such as the number of teeth and the presence of dentures. Thus questionnaire data can be used for information and screening about some well-defined oral conditions.

Dental Caries↗
PubMed1989

[Increase in electrical potential induced by composite fillings].

There are increasingly reports on sensitivity to pressure on teeth filled with composite resins in the days following the filling, a fact that has induced the Authors to carry out a research "in vitro" and "in vivo" in order to study variations of the electrical potential of teeth filled with composite materials. The study has shown that this potential varies considerably in intensity according to the product used for tests in vitro and in vivo, probably due to polimerization defects of the material. These are the first results of a study which will be further extended and which highlights new and so far unknown aspects of widely used filling materials.

Composite Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation.

Compomers are defined as polyacid-modified resin composites. They are supposed to combine the advantages of traditional glass-ionomer cements with resin composites. This study clinically evaluated a compomer in cervical cavities. Sixty cervical cavities in premolars and molars (24 with cervical caries and 36 with abrasions) randomly divided into two groups of 30 teeth (Group 1 and Group 2) were restored with Dyract (DeTrey-Dentsply, York, PA 17405-0872). The cavities of Group 2 were etched for 30 seconds with orthophosphoric acid before compomer application, while the Group 1 cavities received no treatment. All the restorations were evaluated every six months, up to 48 months: characteristics assessed according to USPHS-modified standards were retention, secondary caries, post-operative sensitivity, marginal adaptation and discoloration, color and wear. The Kaplan-Meier's survival analysis was performed. In both groups, retention was high without any statistically significant difference. No difference was found between the two groups for caries, post-operative sensitivity and wear--that all had a low incidence. Color was not perfectly matched, however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Marginal discoloration and marginal adaptation loss were significantly higher in non-etched group (p < 0.05). Clinically relevant failure required 17.2% of restorations in the non-etched group and 10% in the etched group to be replaced: this difference was not statistically significant. Dyract has an acceptable clinical behavior when used in cervical cavities. Its marginal adaptation is enhanced by etching.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.

This study evaluated the three-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite material, Dyract (DeTrey/Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany), in Class III cavities. Sixty-two Class III cavities in 30 patients were restored with Dyract. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, one-, two- and three-year recalls according to the modified Ryge criteria by two experienced, calibrated examiners. After three years, the retention rate was 96.7%. At the one-year interval, one restoration had to be replaced due to sensitivity. At the two-year recall, one restoration, with a caries lesion adjacent to its margin, was clinically unacceptable and had to be replaced. Except for these two restorations, all other restorations were clinically acceptable in regard to color match, marginal discoloration, wear or loss of anatomical form, caries, marginal adaptation and surface texture after three years. At the end of three years, marginal discoloration was statistically significant (p=0.017) but did not require replacement of any of the restorations. Dyract exhibited significant marginal discoloration after three-year clinical performance in Class III cavities.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.

PURPOSE: The clinical performance of adhesively bonded dental amalgam restorations was compared with that of traditionally placed non-bonded control amalgams in a randomized prospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred thirteen Class II Dispersalloy amalgams were placed in permanent molars and premolars of 31 (21 males, 10 females) human subjects with their informed consent. By random assignment, 60 amalgam restorations were adhesively bonded using ED Primer and Panavia 21 TC (both Kuraray Co, Japan), and 53 traditional non-bonded restorations were placed. Most preparations involved replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Clinical recalls were conducted by experienced evaluators using modified USPHS criteria for occlusal and proximal anatomic form, occlusal and proximal marginal adaptation, and occlusal and proximal surface roughness. RESULTS: For the categories of anatomic form, marginal adaptation, surface quality, and temperature sensitivity, there were no significant differences between bonded and non-bonded amalgam restorations (chi-square analysis, p > 0.05). Three non-bonded restorations were lost at 4, 7, and 24 months from preparations with no deliberate retention. CONCLUSION: After two years' clinical service, there were no failures among the amalgam restorations adhesively bonded using ED Primer and Panavia 21 TC, but three non-bonded restorations failed due to lack of retention. For traditional preparations, adhesively bonded amalgams of the type investigated perform as well as non-bonded amalgams over two years' clinical service.

Bicuspid↗
PubMed1996

Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement.

In 60 patients, 120 partial and full-coverage restorations were cemented on vital abutment teeth with either a glass ionomer or a zinc phosphate luting cement. A split-mouth design and a patient blind data acquisition protocol were used. During an average observation period of 17.3 months there were no differences between the two types of luting cements in regard to subjective and clinical parameters. A high incidence of postoperative hypersensitivity, which is often said to accompany the use of glass ionomer luting cements, was not observed. With the cementation method used in this study, the glass ionomer cement Ketac-Cem Maxicap was an acceptable alternative to conventional zinc phosphate cement. Capsule systems make the clinical handling of glass ionomer luting cements safe and easy and should be used routinely in dental practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in Class II cavities.

A calcium aluminate cement (Doxa Certex, Uppsala, Sweden) has recently been developed intended for use as direct restorative filling material for posterior restorations. The material is inorganic and non-metallic and the main components are CaO, Al2O3, SiO2, and water. The aim of this study was to evaluate intra-individually the experimental calcium aluminate cement (CAC) and a resin composite (RC) in Class II restorations. Each of 57 participants received at least one pair of restorations of the same size, one CAC and one RC (Tetric Ceram). Sixty-one pairs were performed. The restorations were evaluated clinically, according to slightly modified USPHS criteria, at baseline, after 6 months, 1, and 2 years. One-hundred-and-twenty restorations were evaluated at 2 years. Postoperative sensitivity was reported for 5 restorations (2 RC, 3 CAC). Significantly better clinical durability was shown for RC. Five non-acceptable CAC restorations (8.2%) were observed at 6 months, 10 CAC (16.7%) and 2 RC (3.3%) at 12 months, and 11 CAC (18.3%) at 24 months. This resulted in a cumulative failure frequency of 43.3% for the CAC material and 3.3% for the RC material. Main reasons for failure for the CAC were partial material fracture (7), cusp fracture (5), and proximal chip fracture (6). The CAC showed a non-acceptable clinical failure rate for Class II restorations, probably caused by its difficult handling and low mechanical properties.

Adult↗