Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back Pain”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Nonsurgical management of acute and chronic low back pain.

A variety of nonsurgical treatment alternatives exists for acute and chronic low back pain. Patients should receive appropriate education about the favorable natural history of low back pain, basic body mechanics, and methods (eg, exercises, activity modification, behavioral modification) that can reduce symptoms. Nonprescription medication is efficacious for mild to moderate pain. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alone or in combination with muscle relaxants, relieve pain and improve overall symptoms of acute low back pain. Exercise therapy has limited value for acute low back pain, but strong evidence supports exercise therapy in the management of chronic low back pain. Moderately strong evidence supports the use of manipulation in acute back pain. Evidence is weak for the use of epidural corticosteroid injections in patients with acute low back pain, strong for short-term relief of chronic low back pain, and limited for long-term relief of chronic low back pain. The use of facet injections in the management of acute low back pain is not supported by evidence, nor is the effectiveness of orthoses, traction, magnets, or acupuncture. Trigger point injections are not indicated for nonspecific acute or chronic low back pain, and sacroiliac joint injections are not indicated in the routine management of low back pain. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study of two samples of patients with acute and chronic low back pain, respectively. OBJECTIVES: To compare the responsiveness of four functional status questionnaires, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Disability Rating Index (DRI), and Physical Functioning scale of the SF-36 (PFSF-36), and two pain scales, a Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Concurrent comparisons of different outcome measurements in back patients have been requested. METHODS: Norwegian versions of the scales and questionnaires were completed by 54 patients with acute (<3 weeks) and 50 patients with chronic low back pain (>3 months). Clinical change was estimated on a global change index. An alternative external criterion was the expected clinical course in the two cohorts. Mean changes, standardized response mean (SRM), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with cutoff point for highest sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: At the follow-up, 63% of the acute and 41% of the chronic sample reported improvement on the global change index. Large SRMs (1.3-2.0) and areas under the ROC curves (0.84-0.93) were found for the measurements in the acute sample. In the chronic sample, the SRMs (0.4-1.1) and areas under the ROC curves (0.65-0.83) were lower, in particular for the PFSF-36 and the VAS. There was no statistically significant difference between the responsiveness in the measurements, except for higher responsiveness in the NRS compared with the VAS when using expected clinical course as the external criterion for change. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that all the outcome measures were appropriate for measuring changes in functional status and pain in patients with acute low back pain, whereas among chronic patients the RMDQ, ODI, DRI, and NRS were most appropriate.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1996

The management of low back pain in pregnancy.

SUMMARY. Low back pain is a common condition seen in pregnancy. The treatment of low back pain in pregnant patients is essentially different from the treatment of the non-pregnant patient. These differences arise when it comes to understanding the reasons why pregnant patients get back pain and the differential diagnostics relating to obstetrics. The techniques are different as the patient cannot be treated prone, and manual techniques are better than mechanical ones because the palpatory response to the changing tissues is very important in this group of patients. Copyright 1996 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

Superficial heat or cold for low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Heat and cold are commonly utilised in the treatment of low-back pain by both health care professionals and people with low-back pain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of superficial heat and cold therapy for low-back pain in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Back Review Group Specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2005), EMBASE (1980 to October 2005) and other relevant databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials that examined superficial heat or cold therapies in people with low-back pain. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data, using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: Nine trials involving 1117 participants were included. In two trials of 258 participants with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain, heat wrap therapy significantly reduced pain after five days (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 1.45, scale range 0 to 5) compared to oral placebo. One trial of 90 participants with acute low-back pain found that a heated blanket significantly decreased acute low-back pain immediately after application (WMD -32.20, 95%CI -38.69 to -25.71, scale range 0 to 100). One trial of 100 participants with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain examined the additional effects of adding exercise to heat wrap, and found that it reduced pain after seven days. There is insufficient evidence to evaluate the effects of cold for low-back pain, and conflicting evidence for any differences between heat and cold for low-back pain. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base to support the common practice of superficial heat and cold for low back pain is limited and there is a need for future higher-quality randomised controlled trials. There is moderate evidence in a small number of trials that heat wrap therapy provides a small short-term reduction in pain and disability in a population with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain, and that the addition of exercise further reduces pain and improves function. The evidence for the application of cold treatment to low-back pain is even more limited, with only three poor quality studies located. No conclusions can be drawn about the use of cold for low-back pain. There is conflicting evidence to determine the differences between heat and cold for low-back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Pitfalls of patient education. Limited success of a program for back pain in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN: Low back pain patients seen in primary care were allocated randomly to one of two educational interventions or to usual care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate educational interventions designed to improve the outcomes of primary care for low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with back pain are frequently dissatisfied with their medical care and identify lack of information as the most insufficient aspect. METHODS: In a large Health Maintenance Organization clinic, 293 subjects were allocated randomly to receive usual care, an educational booklet, or a 15-minute session with a clinic nurse, including the booklet and a follow-up telephone call. Outcome measures included satisfaction with care, perceived knowledge, participation in exercise, functional status, symptom relief, and health care use. Outcomes were assessed 1, 3, 7, and 52 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: The nurse intervention resulted in higher patient satisfaction than usual care (P < 0.001) and higher perceived knowledge (P < 0.001). Self-reported exercise participation was also higher in the nurse intervention group after a 1-week follow-up period (97% vs. 65% in the other groups; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences among the three groups in worry, symptoms, functional status, or health care use at any follow-up interval. Differences in self-reported exercise and perceived knowledge were no longer significant after 7 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge the value of purely educational approaches in reducing functional impact or health care use related to back pain and also challenge the value of fitness exercise in the most acute phase of back pain.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Determination of pain severity in patients with low back pain using kinesiologic electromyography of the sacrospinal muscles].

The values of kinesiological electromyogram (EMG) of the sacrospinal muscles in the lumboscral region during trunk motion in the sagittal plane have been compared between a group of 51 healthy controls and 101 patients suffering from low back pain and/or ischialgia of degenerative etiology. Kinesiological EMG of the sacrospinal muscles refers to the scanning of superficial (EMG) activity of both sacrospinal muscles in the lumbar region by the use of MS6 EMG device and a PC. The patients were classified into five groups on the basis of their subjective reports on the severity of their painful condition evaluated on the visual analogous scale (VAS). The link was found between subjective assessment of pain and EMG activity during flexion and at peak flexion (p < 0.001) and during extension (p < 0.05); a more severe pain is accompanied by an increase in EMG activity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Psychological aspects of chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic low back pain present physicians with diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Physical treatments tend to have low success rates and it is postulated that this may be because low back pain can be a manifestation of abnormal illness behaviour. METHODS: A structured prospective study determined the prevalence of somatization in a sample of 131 adult patients with chronic low back pain using the Illness Behaviour Questionnaire (IBQ) and the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ). The scores on these psychological questionnaires were compared with the blind interpretation of pain distribution drawings and with the results of a mechanical classification of the patient's symptoms and signs. RESULTS: Fifty-four per cent of patients had four or more (out of five) abnormal illness indicators. The MSPQ values for the group were significantly above the control values in the literature. Thirty-two per cent of pain diagrams were thought to be incompatible with an organic cause when assessed by an orthopaedic surgeon and sixty-two per cent when assessed by a psychiatrist. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial factors are dominant in the presentation of chronic low back pain in adults and the disorder is not primarily a musculoskeletal one.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Differences in motor recruitment and resulting kinematics between low back pain patients and asymptomatic participants during lifting exertions.

BACKGROUND: Low back disorders are a prevalent problem in society today and may lead to chronic debilitating low back pain. Developing our understanding of temporal muscle and kinematic patterns during manual material handling tasks may provide insight for preventing the cascading series of events leading to chronic low back pain. METHODS: Sixty-two low back pain patients and 61 asymptomatic participants performed a variety of lifting exertions that varied in lift origin horizontal and vertical distance, lift asymmetry, and weight. Electromyographic activity of 10 trunk muscles as well as trunk and pelvic kinematics was recorded during each exertion. Differences in muscle activation and kinematic parameters were compared between low back pain patients and asymptomatic participants as a function of experimental conditions. FINDINGS: Both the left and right erector spinae activated significantly earlier and were on significantly longer in low back pain patients compared to asymptomatic participants. The horizontal and vertical location of the lift influenced the EMG and kinematic differences between the low back pain patients and asymptomatic participants. INTERPRETATION: These finding indicate that low back pain patients would be exposed to increase muscle activity resulting in higher spine loads for a greater length of time compared to asymptomatic participants. The longer exposure time to increased spine load may lead to greater risk of future low back injury and cascading events leading to debilitating low back pain. The longer muscle activation time suggests that low back pain patients have changed their motor program from an open to a closed loop system.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Economic rehabilitation management among patients with chronic low back pain].

BACKGROUND AND STUDY PURPOSE: Back pain causes high costs to society. In Germany, these amount to an estimated total of 5 billion euro of direct costs per year and 13 billion euro of indirect costs, the latter being caused by incapacity to work. The purpose of this study is to develop a concept for economic rehabilitation management. This concept is based on the managed care approach and aims at improving efficiency of care. METHODS: The concept development consists of a theoretical and an empirical part. The method of the theoretical part is based on a systematic literature review on managed care (not included in this article), health systems research and the analysis of economic incentives. For the empirical investigation, long term effects and costs were calculated. For the evaluation of effects, we psychometrically tested and used the EuroQol (EQ-5D) as a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQL). The calculation of costs (both direct and indirect) is based on routine data of payers, a cost diary and the internal cost accounting systems of rehabilitation clinics. We statistically analysed the cost distribution and identified predictors of the management targets (e.g., costs of care) by means of regression analyses. RESULTS: The market-driven managed care approach is based on three tools: (1) a primary care system with case management and gatekeeping, (2) direct influence on providers by utilisation review and setting guidelines, and (3) indirect influence by setting supply-side economic incentives via the remuneration mode. The third managed care tool is most important when managing the rehabilitation of working age patients with chronic low back pain from an economic point of view. This concept consists of three components: (1) a case-based budget for direct costs; this is a prospective remuneration mode for an integrated primary care network including a rehabilitation facility, (2) retrospective bonus payments which are related to savings of indirect costs, and (3) retrospective bonus payments which are related to the effectiveness of rehabilitation, i.e. gains in HRQL. Common features of the three management components are a long-term perspective (e.g., from admission to a rehabilitation clinic until six months after discharge) and risk-adjustment of the three management targets (i.e., direct and indirect costs and gains in HRQL) in order to avoid selection and to limit the financial risk for providers. The EuroQol instrument shows acceptable psychometric properties in the rehabilitation setting for back pain patients. This instrument may yield two kinds of preference-based index values, one reflecting the preferences of the general population and one those of the patient. The Pearson correlation of these two approaches is fair, but there is a systematic difference. Empirical investigation shows that the distribution of both direct and indirect costs is skewed to the right. Statistically relevant predictors of the management targets are incapacity to work and HRQL at admission. CONCLUSIONS: Economic rehabilitation management might help to save money and to improve health outcomes, thus increasing the efficiency of care. The results of our empirical studies show the feasibility of tools for the economic management of rehabilitation. Risk adjustment of the management components is of paramount importance.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2001

Relative contribution of mental health and exercise-related pain increment to treadmill test intolerance in patients with chronic low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative contribution of pain increase and mental health to testing performance during a single bout of exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to which factors principally limit physical performance in patients with chronic low back pain. Some believe psychological factors limit physical performance, whereas others believe activity-related increases in pain intensity limit performance. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with chronic low back pain reported pain intensity before and after undergoing a maximal, symptom-limited modified treadmill test. Walking time (in minutes) and aerobic fitness were measured. The Short Form 36 Health Survey was administered to all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the sample stopped testing because of a significant increase in pain intensity (P = 0.0001). Treadmill performance was lower in patients who stopped because of pain than in those who stopped because of fatigue (P = 0.02). The patients who stopped because of pain were also more likely to have low mental health as assessed by the Short Form 36 Health Survey. Low mental health, however, did not have a statistically significant influence on treadmill performance. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that impairment of physical performance during treadmill testing in patients with chronic low back pain is attributable to testing-induced increase in pain intensity rather than to individual low mental health scores.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The course of back pain in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN: Review paper of outcome studies among primary care back pain patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the short-term and long-term pain and functional outcomes of patients with back pain who are seeking treatment in primary care settings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain has been viewed as running either an acute or a chronic course, but most patients experience recurrent back pain. This review summarizes outcome studies in light of the episodic course of back pain. METHODS: Studies reporting pain and functional outcome data for consecutive primary care patients with back pain were reviewed. RESULTS: Back pain among primary care patients typically is a recurrent condition for which definitions of acute and chronic pain based on a single episode are inadequate. Because a majority of patients experience recurrences, describing only the outcome of the initial back pain episode may convey a more favorable picture of long-term outcome than warranted. For the short-term follow-up evaluation, most patients improve considerably during the first 4 weeks after seeking treatment. Sixty-six percent to 75% continue to experience at least mild back pain 1 month after seeking care. At 1 month, approximately 33% report continuing pain of at least moderate intensity, whereas 20-25% report substantial activity limitations. For the long-term follow-up (1 year or more) period, approximately 33% report intermittent or persistent pain of at least moderate intensity, one in seven continue to report back pain of severe intensity, and one in five report substantial activity limitations. CONCLUSION: Results from existing studies suggest that back pain among primary care patients typically runs a recurrent course characterized by variation and change, rather than an acute, self-limiting course.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2000

Gender-age environmental associates of adolescent low back pain.

This paper describes adolescent low back pain and tests its associations with environmental features of backpack load, time spent carrying loads, time sitting, and time playing sport, using data from 1269 adolescents in twelve volunteer high schools in Adelaide, South Australia. Backpacks were the preferred method of load carrying, two-thirds of wearers preferring to carry the load over two shoulders. The average load weighed 5.3 kg (approximating 10% of body weight). The youngest students carried approximately the same amount as the oldest students. Girls were more likely than boys to report recent low back pain, and there were gender- and age-specific associations between recent low back pain, the amount of time spent sitting, the backpack load and time spent carrying it, and time playing sport. Body mass was not a confounder of any association. These findings support ongoing concerns regarding environmental contributions to adolescent low back pain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Two different techniques in the rehabilitation treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: The Back School is a widely accepted and effective method for treating low back pain, whereas no scientific evidence exists about the effects of the Pilates CovaTech method. With this study we wanted to evaluate the efficacy of this new method in patients with low back pain. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with at least 3 months of nonspecific low back pain were entered into a Pilates therapy or a Back School treatment group, 43 of which completed the study. Small exercise groups of 7 patients each followed a daily kinesitherapy protocol for 10 days. Evaluations were performed at the start of the study and then at 1, 3 and 6 months after the beginning of treatment. We used the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Scale (OLBPDQ) to assess disability and the visual analog scale (VAS) to evaluate pain. RESULTS: Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics were similar for both groups. A significant reduction in pain intensity and disability was observed across the entire sample. The Pilates method group showed better compliance and subjective response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained with the Pilates method were comparable to those achieved with the Back School method, suggesting its use as an alternative approach to the treatment of non specific low back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Altering beliefs about pain and impairment in a functionally oriented treatment program for chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined pain and impairment beliefs [measured with the Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale, (PAIRS)] of chronic low back pain patients during rehabilitation and hypothesized that pain beliefs would be stronger in drop-out subjects, decrease during treatment, and after treatment correlate strongly with disability measures. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Outpatient, functionally oriented rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain. PATIENTS: 72 consecutive chronic low back pain referral patients disabled from working because of pain. INVOLVEMENT: Interdisciplinary rehabilitation with a focus on intensive physical reconditioning was employed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Program completion versus drop-out groups and pretreatment and posttreatment pain, disability, depression, and PAIRS scores were compared. RESULTS: Thirty patients dropped out and 42 subjects completed treatment. The PAIRS scores at evaluation were similar for both groups. The PAIRS scores improved significantly during treatment (p < 0.001). Posttreatment PAIRS scores correlated highly with disability measures (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pain beliefs are of minimal value for predicting treatment compliance, but may be altered during functionally oriented treatment of chronic low back pain. Posttreatment disability closely mirrored attitudes and belief-associated pain and impairment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Pain sensitivity as a correlate of clinical status in individuals with chronic low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of baseline correlates of clinical pain and functional status in consecutive patients being treated for chronic low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine if an individual's global pain sensitivity, measured by experimental pain threshold to pressure at various regions of the body, is associated with baseline measures of clinical pain and physical functioning. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have demonstrated that in individuals with chronic low back pain, clinical pain and functional status are significantly associated with demographic, structural, and psychosocial factors. However, a large portion of variance remains unexplained. Because pain sensitivity (tenderness) has been shown to occur as a continuum in the population, the authors sought to determine if such sensitivity might be associated with clinical status in chronic low back pain, beyond what is known regarding demographic, structural, and psychosocial factors. METHODS: Forty-five patients with chronic low back pain were assessed for a variety of demographic, structural, and psychosocial factors, which previously have been shown to contribute to clinical status. In addition, all patients underwent testing for pain tolerance and threshold at various areas of the body. RESULTS: Age, degree of structural abnormality observed on magnetic resonance imaging, and depressive symptoms were all significantly correlated with either clinical pain or functional status. Pain sensitivity, the target of this investigation, accounted for significant proportions of variance in functional status and pain, even after controlling for demographic, structural, and psychosocial variables. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that an individual's experimental pain threshold (a measure of tenderness) is associated with baseline functional status and pain in cases of chronic low back pain and may represent an important domain warranting further investigation.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2001

Risk factors for the development of low back pain in adolescence.

A previous history and earlier onset of low back pain are associated with chronic low back pain in adults, implying that prevention in adolescence may have a positive impact in adulthood. The study objectives were to determine the incidence of low back pain in a cohort of adolescents and to ascertain risk factors. A cohort of 502 high school students in Montreal, Canada, was evaluated during 1995-1996 at three separate times, 6 months apart. The outcome was low back pain occurrence at a frequency of at least once a week in the previous 6 months. Of the 377 adolescents who did not complain of low back pain at the initial evaluation, 65 developed low back pain over the year (cumulative incidence, 17 percent). Risk factors associated with development of low back pain were high growth (odds ratio = 3.09; 95 percent confidence interval (CI): 1.53, 6.01), smoking (odds ratio = 2.20; 95% CI: 1.38, 3.50), tight quadriceps femoris (odds ratio = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05), tight hamstrings (odds ratio = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.06), and working during the school year (odds ratio = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.71). Modifying such risk factors as smoking and poor leg flexibility may potentially serve to prevent the development of low back pain in adolescents.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

The modified Stroop paradigm as a measure of selective attention towards pain-related information in patients with chronic low back pain.

The present study assessed, by means of a modified Stroop paradigm, whether highly fearful patients with chronic low back pain pay selective attention to words related to movement and injury. Two groups of patients (High Fear and Low Fear) were included based on their scores on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), a measure of fear of movement or (re)injury. A control group was recruited by means of advertisement in a local newspaper. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to examine whether highly fearful pain patients pay more selective attention to movement and injury words, compared to patients with low pain-related fear and controls. The results from the present study do not support the proposition that highly fearful patients with chronic low back pain selectively pay attention to words related to injury and movement. Limitations of the modified Stroop paradigm are discussed as well as the need for the application of alternative methods such as the dot-probe paradigm.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Low back pain problems among steelworkers].

The associations between low-back pain and occupational work loads, life-style factors, and sociodemographic factors were examined in 469 steel plant workers (436 males, 33 females), mean age (sd): 40 (12) years. Fifty-one per cent had experienced low-back pain during the preceding year. The strongest associations were found between recent low-back pain and domestic recreational activities (> or = h/wk vs 0-2 h/wk), and between recent low-back pain and work pace (too fast vs. adequate), odds ratios (95% confidence limits) being respectively 3.0 (1.5-5.8), and 2.3 (1.2-4.2). We considered a subject to have a particularly severe history of low-back pain if he or she due to low-back trouble (i) had ever been admitted to a hospital, (ii) had ever had to change work or, (iii) had had more than one week's sick-leave accumulated during the preceding year. There was a strong association between a severe low-back pain history and life-time occupational exposure to heavy and frequent lifting on the job. Forty-seven per cent of severe low-back pain events could be ascribed to heavy and frequent lifting, provided the associations were causal. We conclude that domestic recreational activities may be an important potential confounder in studies on occupational risk factors for low-back pain, and that, based on the results of this and of other studies, a case for prevention still seems to exist regarding lifting of heavy burdens in the work environment.

Adult↗