Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Timolol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources

A clinical trial of timolol and epinephrine in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Forty-seven patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma who required therapy but who had never been treated previously were enrolled in a prospective randomized, long-term clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of 0.5% timolol maleate and 1% epinephrine. Patients were followed for an average of 33 months. There were 20 failures, 18 of which were because of inadequate intraocular pressure (IOP) control (required 20% reduction in outflow pressure). Twelve failures were in the epinephrine group and eight were in the timolol group. During the first year of therapy, 35% compared with 0% of patients failed in the epinephrine and timolol groups, respectively (P less than 0.01). During the later years of the study, the failure rates in the two groups were similar. The results suggest that timolol is superior to epinephrine during the first year of therapy, and likely as effective as epinephrine in the long-term treatment of glaucoma.

Aged↗

A comparison of timolol maleate and levobunolol. Length of use per 5-ml bottle.

PURPOSE: The authors analyzed the actual length of use of commercially available 5-ml bottles of 0.5% timolol maleate (Timoptic) and 0.5% levobunolol (Betagan) among patients who routinely use topical beta-blockers (1 drop twice daily in both eyes) for glaucoma treatment. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive two 5-ml bottles of either timolol or levobunolol in a double-blind fashion. The patients used the drops independently and the bottles in sequence. The dates were recorded when each of the two 5-ml bottles were used. Sixty patients were enrolled, 15 were excluded from the study, and the data from the remaining 45 were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a 21% greater length of use per 5-ml bottle among patients who were randomized to 0.5% timolol maleate (36.6 +/- 10.4 days) compared with 0.5% levobunolol (28.9 +/- 8.1 days) (P = 0.009). The length of use of the first bottle versus the second bottle was compared and was found not to be significantly different in either group. There was no statistical difference in intraocular pressure control among patients before and after the study. CONCLUSION: There is a markedly greater length of use of the 5-ml bottle of timolol compared with the 5-ml bottle of levobunolol. The difference is believed to be due to the configuration of the levobunolol's bottle tip and the vehicle used to deliver the drug. The data may be extrapolated to a substantial patient savings and should be considered in prescription recommendations.

Aged↗

Simultaneous determination of dorzolamide HCL and timolol maleate in eye drops by two different spectroscopic methods.

Two-component mixtures of dorzolamide hydrochloride and timolol maleate were assayed by first derivative and ratio derivative spectrophotometric methods. The first method, derivative spectrophotometry, by the zero-crossing measurements, was used due to the drugs closely overlapping absorption spectra. Linear calibration graphs of first derivative values at 250.3 nm for dorzolamide hydrochloride and 315.8 nm for timolol maleate. The second method, is based on ratio first derivative spectrophotometry, the amplitudes in the first derivative of the ratio spectra at 242.9 and at 223.5 nm were selected to determine dorzolamide and timolol maleate in the binary mixture. Calibration graphs were established for 8.0-30.0 microg ml(-1) for dorzolamide hydrochloride and 3.0-24.6 microg ml(-1) for timolol maleate in binary mixture. Good linearity, precision and selectivity were found, and the proposed methods were applied successfully to the pharmaceutical dosage from containing the above-mentioned drug combination without any interference by the excipients. Vierordt's method was also developed for a comparison method.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Effect of beta-adrenergic blockade with timolol on myocardial blood flow during exercise after myocardial infarction in the dog.

The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade with timolol (40 micrograms/kg) on myocardial blood flow during rest and graded treadmill exercise was assessed in 12 chronically instrumented dogs 10 to 14 days after myocardial infarction was produced by acute left circumflex coronary artery occlusion. During exercise at comparable external work loads, the heart rate-systolic blood pressure product was significantly decreased after timilol, with concomitant reductions of myocardial blood flow in normal, border and central ischemic areas (p less than 0.001) and increases in subendocardial/subepicardial blood flow ratios (p less than 0.05). In addition to the blunted chronotropic response to exercise, timolol exerted an effect on myocardial blood flow that was not explained by changes in heart rate or blood pressure. At comparable rate-pressure products during exercise, total myocardial blood flow was 24% lower after timolol (p less than 0.02) and flow was redistributed from subepicardium to subendocardium in all myocardial regions. Thus, timolol altered myocardial blood flow during exercise by two separate mechanisms: a negative chronotropic effect, and a significant selective reduction of subepicardial perfusion independent of changes in heart rate or blood pressure with transmural redistribution of flow toward the subendocardium.

Animals↗

Enhancement of salvage of reperfused myocardium by early beta-adrenergic blockade (timolol).

Although reperfusion of severely ischemic myocardium with thrombolytic agents or surgery has shown reduction in infarct size, the time after coronary occlusion during which reperfusion can salvage ischemic myocardium is limited. To determine whether beta-adrenergic blockade could enhance the salvage of ischemic myocardium by reperfusion, the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded in 18 anesthetized dogs. An in vivo area at risk was determined by injecting technetium-99m-labeled albumin microspheres into the left atrium 5 minutes after occlusion and carrying out radioautography to define the poorly perfused tissue. Fifteen minutes after coronary occlusion, the dogs were randomized either to a control (saline-treated) group (n = 8) or to a timolol-treated group (n = 10). Timolol was administered until a decrease of 20% in heart rate or blood pressure occurred (mean total dose = 0.85 +/- 0.22 mg/kg +/- standard error of the mean). Coronary occlusion was maintained for 3 hours and was followed by 3 hours of reperfusion in both groups. At the end of 6 hours, infarct size was defined by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and masses of infarct and risk were calculated. Percent left ventricular mass at risk was similar for both groups (control = 20.9 +/- 2.4%, timolol-treated = 23.7 +/- 2.1%, p = not significant). Mass of necrosis/mass at risk was significantly smaller in the timolol-treated reperfusion group (27.3 +/- 2.7%) versus saline reperfusion alone (46.5 +/- 5.6%) (p less than 0.005). Thus, beta-adrenergic blockade administered early after coronary occlusion results in substantial enhancement of the salvage achieved by reperfusion alone.

Animals↗

Noninvasive evaluation of the effect of timolol on left ventricular performance after myocardial infarction and the consequence for prognosis.

Left ventricular performance was evaluated noninvasively in 111 patients participating at one study center in the Norwegian Multicenter Study on Timolol After Myocardial Infarction. Systolic time intervals were measured in 55 patients treated with timolol and in 56 patients receiving placebo. Measurements were made before randomization, and after 1, 3 and 12 months of treatment. During the treatment period, the pre-ejection period/left ventricular ejection time ratio was significantly lower in the timolol-treated group, indicating better left ventricular function than in the placebo-treated patients. In the 27 patients who died during the follow-up period of 50 to 72 months, there was a significant increase in the pre-ejection period/left ventricular ejection time ratio from baseline to the last performed recording, indicating a deterioration in left ventricular performance in these patients. No such change occurred in the group that survived the entire follow-up period. Deterioration of left ventricular function is related to a high long-term mortality rate after myocardial infarction, and left ventricular function is better preserved in patients treated with timolol than in patients receiving placebo.

Aged↗

Timolol gel versus acetazolamide in the prophylaxis of ocular hypertension after phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after administration of acetazolamide and timolol following phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. SETTING: Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York, USA. METHODS: Sixty patients were included in a prospective, randomized, masked trial. The patients received either two doses of oral, sustained-release acetazolamide (Diamox Sequels) or a single dose of topical timolol 0.5% gel (Timoptic XE). Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry preoperatively and 1 day postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean preoperative IOP was 16.4 mm Hg. One day postoperatively, it was 19.5 mm Hg in the oral acetazolamide group and 15.9 mm Hg in the timolol gel group. One patient in the acetazolamide group developed significant adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic use of topical timolol 0.5% gel for viscoelastic-induced ocular hypertension after cataract extraction appears to offer better IOP control than oral acetazolamide and has potentially fewer adverse systemic effects.

Acetazolamide↗

The kinetics of timolol in the rabbit lens: implications for ocular drug delivery.

This study examines the uptake and distribution of timolol in the rabbit lens following topical instillation using a heuristic approach. The implications of anisotropic drug diffusion through the lens are presented here and discussed in the context of actual in vivo data. The dynamics of timolol in the lens involve an initial, rapid uptake of the drug by the capsule and epithelium followed by slower, anisotropic diffusion through the cortex body. Kinetically, the capsule and epithelium can be treated as a separate compartment which is distinct from the cortex and which serves to provide a concentration gradient for subsequent diffusion of timolol into the dense interior structures of the lens. Model simulations support the hypothesis that the preferred route of penetration of timolol into the vitreous humor via the lens is the diffusion of drug around the capsule/epithelium and peripheral cortical layers. It is also shown that due to the high and increasing diffusional resistance toward the center of the lens, as well as the diminishing drug concentrations in the capsule and epithelium, steady-state levels in the lens may be extremely difficult to achieve in some therapeutic situations. This phenomenon could have a significant impact on the success or failure of a drug treatment involving the lens and ocular tissues.

Administration, Topical↗

The effect on diurnal intraocular pressure of the fixed combination of latanoprost 0.005% and timolol 0.5% in patients with ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To measure the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) after single-dose administration of the fixed combination of latanoprost 0.005% and timolol 0.5%. METHODS: A randomized, double-masked placebo-controlled parallel-group study was carried out. Twenty patients with ocular hypertension received the fixed combination of latanoprost+timolol, while 10 received placebo eyedrops. On baseline day no eyedrops were given, but IOP was measured repeatedly between 8.00 a.m. and 8.00 p.m. On Day 7 the eyedrops were given at 8.00 a.m., and IOP measured as on baseline day. On Day 8 and Day 9, IOP was again measured at 8.00 a.m. RESULTS: There was no difference in IOP in the placebo group. In the latanoprost+timolol group maximal IOP reduction (12.4+/-2.8 mmHg; mean+/-standard deviation) occurred 6.4 hours after drug administration (5.2--7.7 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI]). The mean IOP reduction after 24 hours was 9.8 mmHg (7.4--12.2 mmHg; 95% CI; p<0.001), and after 48 hours 5.7 mmHg (3.4--8.1 mmHg; 95% CI; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The fixed combination of latanoprost+timolol statistically significantly reduced IOP after single-dose administration. The maximal effect was noted after about 6 hours, and the IOP reduction was still pronounced after 48 hours.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Timolol increased retrobulbar flow velocities in untreated glaucoma eyes but not in ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To investigate retrobulbar blood flow velocities and the effects of topical timolol treatment in eyes with newly detected, previously untreated open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Fifteen eyes with open angle glaucoma (OAG) and 12 eyes with ocular hypertension (OH), in the same number of patients, all untreated and newly detected, were examined with colour Doppler imaging of retrobulbar vessels before and after 1 month of topical timolol treatment (0.5% Timoptic BID). RESULTS: Baseline central retinal artery end diastolic velocity was lower (48%, p=0.0002) and resistive index higher (7.6%, p=0.018) in the OAG group than in the OH group. In the glaucoma group mean end diastolic velocity increased by 41%, (p=0.006) while resistive index decreased by 5.8%, (p=0.02) on treatment, while no significant changes were seen in the OH group. Blood flow velocities in the ophthalmic artery did not change with treatment. Baseline IOP and IOP reduction did not differ between OAG and OH group. CONCLUSION: Peripheral resistance to blood flow was found to be increased in untreated glaucoma eyes as compared to a similar group of eyes with ocular hypertension. Timolol treatment diminished resistance significantly in the glaucoma group, but not in the ocular hypertension group. Thus the two groups responded differently to timolol treatment. The reaction to IOP lowering treatment could indicate defective autoregulation in the glaucoma group.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of unoprostone 0.15%, timolol 0.5% and placebo in healthy adults during exercise using a treadmill test.

PURPOSE: To compare the cardiovascular effects of unoprostone 0.15%, timolol 0.5% and placebo in healthy adults during exercise using a treadmill test. METHODS: Thirty subjects aged 18-37 years (mean age = 24.1 years) were randomized to one of six treatment sequences in a three-treatment, three-period crossover study (William's design). Study medication was instilled b.i.d. for 5 days before visits 2, 3, and 4. Between treatments, study medication was washed out for 9-10 days. Each subject underwent a submaximal treadmill test at visits 2 through 4, 15 min after dosing. RESULTS: After 15 min of exercise, average heart rates were 143.1 +/- 21.2, 134.5 +/- 20.0 and 145.4 +/- 20.8 bpm for the unoprostone, timolol and placebo treatments, respectively. At no timepoint was there a statistically significant difference between the unoprostone and placebo treatments (p > 0.05). Beginning with the second minute of exercise, timolol produced a greater decrease in heart rate at all timepoints from placebo than unoprostone (p < 0.05). No consistent differences in systolic or diastolic blood pressure were observed between drug treatments (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike timolol, unoprostone 0.15% does not reduce exercise-induced heart rate, indicating a lack of clinical effect on systemic beta-adrenergic receptors in young and healthy subjects.

Adolescent↗

Cardiovascular effects of timolol maleate, brimonidine or brimonidine/timolol maleate in concomitant therapy.

PURPOSE: To examine the influence on maximal exercise performance in young healthy volunteers of timolol 0.5%, brimonidine 0.2% or placebo versus brimonidine 0.2% and timolol 0.5% used concomitantly. METHODS: The subjects in this prospective, double-masked, crossover comparison were dosed 15 min prior to treadmill testing. A period of 1 week was allowed between tests. RESULTS: The 20 subjects who completed the trials (average age 24.5 +/- 7.4) had a mean maximum exercise heart rate of 196 +/- 12 bpm for placebo, 182 +/- 13 bpm for timolol, 187 +/- 10 bpm for brimonidine, and 186 +/- 11 bpm for timolol/brimonidine concomitant therapy (p < 0.005). During recovery, the placebo group demonstrated a statistically higher systolic blood pressure (min 6) and pulse (mins 2 and 4) (p < 0.01). In addition, subjects treated with timolol/brimonidine demonstrated more premature contractions (atrial or ventricular) overall during exercise and recovery (p = 0.01). The brimonidine and concomitant treatment groups showed the greatest number of adverse events per subject, the most common of which were dizziness and fatigue (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both timolol and brimonidine, used alone and concomitantly, cause cardiovascular effects consistent with their pharmacology.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Progression of retinal nerve fibre layer damage in betaxolol- and timolol-treated glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: It has been suggested that there are differences between selective and non-selective beta-blocking agents in their ability to protect glaucomatous eyes. The purpose of this study was to follow glaucoma patients treated with either betaxolol 0.5% or timolol 0.25% ophthalmic solutions and to compare the rate and degree of progression in retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) defects between the groups. METHODS: A total of 64 patients were prospectively recruited in a double-masked study and randomly divided into two treatment groups. Retinal nerve fibre layer photographs were analysed. The incidence and total amount of progression in each group were recorded. The rate of impairment was demonstrated using Kaplan Meier survival curves. RESULTS: The analysis included 27 patients treated with betaxolol and 28 patients treated with timolol. Of these, 30% of betaxolol-treated patients and 46% of timolol-treated patients had RNFL damage progression (p = 0.20). The total amount or rate of progression did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) levels between the groups (p = 0.68) during follow-up. The degree of RNFL deterioration did not correlate to the amount of IOP reduction. CONCLUSION: The group treated with betaxolol 0.5% and the group treated with timolol 0.25% did not differ significantly in RNFL damage progression.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Dynamics and kinetics of ophthalmic timolol.

Timolol is a beta adrenergic antagonist in 0.25% or 0.5% eyedrop solution for glaucoma. In a double-blind crossover study in healthy males we measured systemic beta blockade, intraocular pressure, and timolol kinetics after the first and ninth 12-hourly dose of a 0.5% ophthalmic solution. Timolol ophthalmic and placebo were each given as 2 drops to each eye with precautions to prevent the normal loss of drug in tears and overflow (high dose) and as 1 drop to each eye with no special precautions (standard therapeutic dose). Exercise tachycardia, measured at 70 and 255 min after administration of drug, was lower at both levels. Postexercise 1-sec forced expiratory volume (FEV1) was not affected. Intraocular pressure measured at 3 and 8 hr after drug was lower at both dose levels. Timolol was consistently present in urine but was not detectable in most plasma samples. Dynamic effects were not greater after the ninth than after the first dose, and the urinary excretion data provided no evidence of drug cumulation.

Blood Pressure↗

Double-masked three-period crossover investigation of timolol in control of raised intraocular pressure.

Forty patients with an intraocular pressure (IOP) between 30 and 49 mmHg in either eye (57 eyes) were recruited into a trial of timolol 0.25% versus timolol 0.5%. Patients were randomised to receive the two concentrations of drug in the order ABA or BAB. The study period was 12 weeks for each patient, with changes in drug concentration at 4 and 8 weeks. IOPs were measured at the same time every 2 weeks. Mean IOP of both eyes was used, excluding any eyes with initial IOPs of less than 30 mmHg. There was no difference between the 2-week and 4-week pressure readings, which were therefore combined. There was no statistically significant difference in the initial IOPs of the two groups (0.5%, 33.45 mmHg; 0.25%, 32.63 mmHg) nor in the initial fall in IOP with either concentration (0.5%, 12.03 mmHg; 0.25%, 11.31 mmHg). Furthermore, changing from one concentration to the other had no significant effect on IOP. Mean IOPs over the whole study period averaged 21.12 mmHg for timolol 0.25% and 20.75 mmHg for timolol 0.5%. Again these differences were not statistically significant. The statistical power of the study was estimated to exceed 85%. The authors suggest that there is no justification for use of the 0.5% strength, which is more expensive and has no advantages.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗

A three-year prospective, randomized and open comparison between latanoprost and timolol in Japanese normal-tension glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the longitudinal effects of treatment on intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual field performance in Japanese normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) between latanoprost and timolol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is an open-label, randomized, study. A total of 62 NTG patients were prospectively, consecutively enrolled. All study subjects were randomly assigned to 0.005% latanoprost instillation once daily in the morning or 0.5% timolol instillation twice daily for a prospective 3-year follow-up, and underwent a routine ocular examination every month. Automated perimetry was performed every 6 months using Humphrey field analysers. Stereophotographs of optic discs were also obtained every 6 months. RESULTS: Percentage of IOP reduction or the magnitude of IOP reduction showed no intergroup differences either at any time point (13-15%). In the visual field, the estimated rate of change in the MD value (dB/year) was -0.34+/-0.17 (SE) for the latanoprost group, and -0.10+/-0.18 (SE) for the timolol group. The estimated rate of change in MD showed no significant difference from zero in both groups, and there were no statistical intergroup differences. No changes in the optic nerve head topography in the vertical cup-to-disc ratio and rim area measured by image-analysis techniques were observed in either group. There were no patients who dropped out due to the side effects of treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: Both latanoprost and timolol single treatments reduced IOP by 13-15% at their trough effects for 3 years in Japanese NTG patients; both showed similar effects on visual field performance.

Adult↗

Brimonidine 0.2% vs unoprostone 0.15% both added to timolol maleate 0.5% given twice daily to patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of brimonidine 0.2% vs unoprostone 0.15%, both added to timolol maleate 0.5% each given twice daily. METHODS: In this prospective, multi-centred, double-masked, crossover comparison, patients were randomized to one treatment group for a 6-week treatment period, and then crossed over to the opposite treatment. Measurements were performed at 0800, 1000, 1600, 1800, and 2000 h at baseline and at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: In all, 33 patients entered this trial and 29 completed. The baseline trough intraocular pressure (IOP) was 23.3+/-2.4 and the diurnal curve IOP was 22.0+/-1.3 mmHg. For the brimonidine and timolol maleate treatment group, the trough IOP was 21.6+/-3.3 and the diurnal curve IOP was 19.8+/-2.1 mmHg, while the timolol and unoprostone treatment showed a trough IOP of 20.9+/-3.8 and a diurnal curve IOP of 19.3+/-2.4 mmHg. There was no significant difference between treatment groups at any time point for the diurnal curve, or in the reduction from baseline (P>0.05). Both treatments failed to statistically reduce the IOP from baseline at 1800 h. There was no difference between treatment groups regarding ocular and systemic unsolicited adverse events, but patients admitted to more dryness (P=0.02) and burning upon instillation (P<0.0001) with unoprostone by survey. CONCLUSION: Brimonidine 0.2% or unoprostone 0.15% added to timolol maleate 0.5% provide similar efficacy and safety throughout the daytime diurnal curve.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

Singlet molecular oxygen generation and quenching by the antiglaucoma ophthalmic drugs, Timolol and Pindolol.

The dye sensitized photooxidation in water (pH 6), of the pharmaceutical topical antiglaucoma drugs, Timolol and Pindolol, which act as beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists, were studied by means of static and time-resolved spectroscopic methods and polarographic determinations. O2(1delta(g))-mediated photooxidation of Timolol and Pindolol takes place with quantum efficiencies of 0.035 and 0.16, respectively, which raises concern about the possible daylight-mediated photodamaging of the drugs, in the presence of sensitizing agents. Pindolol behaves kinetically as a typical indole derivative, for which the intermediacy of a polar complex is proposed. Solvent effects on the kinetics of photooxidation suggests that the same mechanism could operate for the case of Timolol. Upon direct ultraviolet-light irradiation Timolol and Pindolol generate O2(1delta(g)), with quantum yields of 0.027 and 0.11 respectively. The former comprises three desirable properties for an external-use ocular drug: a reduced efficiency of O2(1delta(g)) photooxidation, a relatively high power as O2(1delta(g)) physical deactivator and a relatively low propensity to O2(1delta(g)) generation upon direct light irradiation.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗