Ethical aspects of assisted reproductive technologies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Fifth Report by the Science and Technology Committee of the House of Commons advances majority positions which often are highly supportive of reproductive liberty. This was, however, achieved with considerable difficulty and involved numerous compromises with a minority favouring intrusion by the state into reproductive matters. The report identifies examples of regulatory overreach in such areas as gender selection and gamete donation. The report is available on the internet and deserves to be widely read both at home and abroad. It merits being honoured not only for the nobility of some of its expressions, but more significantly to the extent that it proves effective in enhancing the protection of reproductive freedom from creeping statism and arbitrary regulation.
The current method of calculating cumulative pregnancy rate can lead to an overestimation of treatment efficacy, especially over many cycles of assisted reproduction treatment. The choice of scale of passage of time should be dependent upon the types of treatment to be evaluated. The number of treatment cycles to which patients' effort and commitment is directly related may be appropriate where the chance of pregnancy is expected to be significantly higher than non-treatment for them. Limiting the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rate only to the second or third cycle within 1 or 2 years will ensure that most patients are included in the calculation. More research is needed to assess different methods and develop better variables for assessing the efficacy of infertility treatment that can be informative for patients over the course of their treatment.
After more than a decade of study, discussion and debate, the Canadian House of Commons and Senate have approved the Assisted Human Reproduction Act. Building on the earlier Bill C-47, which died on the order paper in 1997, the Act bans human cloning for reproductive or therapeutic purposes, payment for surrogacy arrangements, and trading in human reproductive materials or their use without informed consent. In addition, the Act significantly restricts research using human reproductive materials. This article compares the Act to legislative regimes in other nations with advanced human reproductive science. It concludes that while the Act has many laudable goals, it is flawed in that it tries to cover too much legislative ground. As a result it unreasonable impairs the ability of Canadian scientists to compete in areas such as stem cell research, and area that is expected to yield significant new approaches to treating human disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The increasing incidence of male subfertility as an indication for ART is first discussed. The tendency to use assisted reproduction techniques in such cases is attributed to the disappointing results of classical treatments. The Authors deal with two problems: the choice of the best treatment methods of the sperm and the choice of the best technique of ART for treating male infertility. The analysis of 138 couples treated for male subfertility showed that the centrifugation on discontinuous Percoll gradients (CDPG) and especially on the mini-Percoll (mini CDPG) offers the best results if compared with pellet swim up and other techniques. With reference to the technique of choice, an accurate analysis of tubal (TET and ZIFT) and uterine (IVF/ET) transfers shows that no advantage seems to be obtained with the more sophisticated and exacting tubal transfer. This final conclusion is presently evaluated on the basis of a retrospective study.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.