Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources

Differential Crosslinking and Contractile Motors Drive Nuclear Chromatin Compaction.

During interphase, a typical cell nucleus features spatial compartmentalization of transcriptionally active euchromatin and repressed heterochromatin domains. In conventional nuclear organization, euchromatin predominantly occupies the nuclear interior, while heterochromatin, which is approximately 50% more dense than euchromatin, is positioned near the nuclear periphery. Peripheral chromatin organization can be further modulated by the nuclear lamina, which is itself a deformable structure. While a number of biophysical mechanisms for compartmentalization within rigid nuclei have been explored, we study a chromatin model consisting of an active, crosslinked polymer tethered to a deformable, polymeric lamina shell. Contractile motors, the deformability of the shell, and the spatial distribution of crosslinks all play pivotal roles in this compartmentalization. We find that a radial crosslink density distribution, even with a small linear differential of higher crosslinking density at the edge of the nucleus, combined with contractile motor activity, drives genomic segregation, in agreement with experimental observations. This arises from contractile motors preferentially drawing crosslinks into their vicinity at the nuclear periphery, forming high-density domains that promote heterochromatin formation. We also find an increased stiffness of nuclear wrinkles given the preferential heterochromatin compaction below the lamina shell, which is consistent with instantaneous nuclear stiffening under applied nanoindentation. We conclude with the potential for experimental validation of our model predictions.

Journal Article↗

ADD1/SREBP1 promotes adipocyte differentiation and gene expression linked to fatty acid metabolism.

Adipocyte determination and differentiation-dependent factor 1 (ADD1) is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-LZ) family of transcription factors that binds to two distinct DNA sequences and has been associated with both adipocyte development and cholesterol homeostasis (where it has been termed SREBP1). To investigate the biological role of ADD1, we expressed wild-type and dominant negative forms of this protein with retroviral vectors in preadipocytes and nonadipogenic cells. A dominant-negative form of ADD1 with a point mutation in the DNA-binding domain sharply represses the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells as observed morphologically or by the expression of adipocyte-specific mRNAs. When NIH-3T3 cells ectopically expressing ADD1 are cultured under hormonal conditions not favoring differentiation, they do not overtly differentiate but still activate expression of mRNAs for fatty acid synthase (FAS) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), two key genes that regulate fatty acid metabolism. Under culture conditions permissive for differentiation including a PPAR activator, 15%-20% of the cells expressing ADD1 undergo adipogenesis while 2%-3% of cells containing a control vector differentiate. Simultaneous expression of ADD1 with PPARgamma increases the transcriptional activity of this adipogenic nuclear hormone receptor, suggesting involvement of ADD1 in this pathway. These data indicate that ADD1 plays an important role in fat cell gene expression and differentiation, and suggest that it may function by augmenting a step in PPARgamma-mediated transcription.

3T3 Cells↗

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants provide evidence of hexokinase PII as a bifunctional enzyme with catalytic and regulatory domains for triggering carbon catabolite repression.

A selection system has been devised for isolating hexokinase PII structural gene mutants that cause defects in carbon catabolite repression, but retain normal catalytic activity. We used diploid parental strains with homozygotic defects in the hexokinase PI structural gene and with only one functional hexokinase PII allele. Of 3,000 colonies tested, 35 mutants (hex1r) did not repress the synthesis of invertase, maltase, malate dehydrogenase, and respiratory enzymes. These mutants had additional hexokinase PII activity. In contrast to hex1 mutants (Entian et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 156:99-105, 1977; F.K. Zimmermann and I. Scheel, Mol. Gen. Genet. 154:75-82, 1977), which were allelic to structural gene mutants of hexokinase PII and had no catalytic activity (K.-D. Entian, Mol. Gen. Gent. 178:633-637, 1980), the hex1r mutants sporulated hardly at all or formed aberrant cells. Those ascospores obtained were mostly inviable. As the few viable hex1r segregants were sterile, triploid cells were constructed to demonstrate allelism between hex1r mutants and hexokinase PII structural gene mutants. Metabolite concentrations, growth rate, and ethanol production were the same in hex1r mutants and their corresponding wild-type strains. Recombination of hexokinase and glucokinase alleles gave strains with different specific activities. The defect in carbon catabolite repression was strongly associated with the defect in hexokinase PII and was independent of the glucose phosphorylating capacity. Hence, a secondary effect caused by reduced hexose phosphorylation was not responsible for the repression defect in hex1 mutants. These results, and those with the hex1r mutants isolated, strongly supported our earlier hypothesis that hexokinase PII is a bifunctional enzyme with (i) catalytic activity and (ii) a regulatory component triggering carbon catabolite repression (Entian, Mol. Gen. Genet. 178:633-637, 1980; K.-D. Entian and D. Mecke, J. Biol. Chem. 257:870-874, 1982).

Alleles↗

Multiple functions within the Epstein-Barr virus EBNA-3A protein.

Two regions of the EBNA-3A protein of Epstein-Barr virus were shown to be capable of binding to the cell protein RBP-Jk (also known as CBF-1), a component of the Notch signaling pathway. Consistent with this binding, EBNA-3A inhibited reporter gene expression from plasmids containing RBP-Jk DNA binding sites within their promoters, including the Cp promoter. When EBNA-3A was linked to a GAL4 DNA binding domain, it repressed the activity of a promoter containing GAL4 binding sites at all plasmid concentrations tested. However, a deletion mutant of EBNA-3A lacking amino acids 100 to 364 showed a biphasic response in the GAL4 assay: it inhibited transcription at low DNA concentrations but activated it at high DNA concentrations. There appears to be a gene activation function within EBNA-3A that is masked in the full-length protein in this assay. Current models for EBNA-3 function have stressed transcription repression through binding to RBP-Jk, but we consider an alternative scheme in which the role of the binding of EBNA-3A, -3B, and -3C to RBP-Jk is to buffer the levels of active EBNA-3 protein. We have also found that the behavior of EBNA-3A in a cell fractionation procedure that distinguishes insoluble matrix from soluble cell fractions is modified by EBNA-LP, indicating a further novel level of interplay between the EBNA proteins.

Binding Sites↗

A chromatin insulator-like element in the herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated transcript region binds CCCTC-binding factor and displays enhancer-blocking and silencing activities.

A previous study demonstrated that the latency-associated transcript (LAT) promoter and the LAT enhancer/reactivation critical region (rcr) are enriched in acetyl histone H3 (K9, K14) during herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) latency, whereas all lytic genes analyzed (ICP0, UL54, ICP4, and DNA polymerase) are not (N. J. Kubat, R. K. Tran, P. McAnany, and D. C. Bloom, J. Virol. 78:1139-1149, 2004). This suggests that the HSV-1 latent genome is organized into histone H3 (K9, K14) hyperacetylated and hypoacetylated regions corresponding to transcriptionally permissive and transcriptionally repressed chromatin domains, respectively. Such an organization implies that chromatin insulators, similar to those of cellular chromosomes, may separate distinct transcriptional domains of the HSV-1 latent genome. In the present study, we sought to identify cis elements that could partition the HSV-1 genome into distinct chromatin domains. Sequence analysis coupled with chromatin immunoprecipitation and luciferase reporter assays revealed that (i) the long and short repeats and the unique-short region of the HSV-1 genome contain clustered CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) motifs, (ii) CTCF motif clusters similar to those in HSV-1 are conserved in other alphaherpesviruses, (iii) CTCF binds to these motifs on latent HSV-1 genomes in vivo, and (iv) a 1.5-kb region containing the CTCF motif cluster in the LAT region possesses insulator activities, specifically, enhancer blocking and silencing. The finding that CTCF, a cellular protein associated with chromatin insulators, binds to motifs on the latent genome and insulates the LAT enhancer suggests that CTCF may facilitate the formation of distinct chromatin boundaries during herpesvirus latency.

Animals↗

Role of histone acetylation in the control of gene expression.

Histone proteins play structural and functional roles in all nuclear processes. They undergo different types of covalent modifications, defined in their ensemble as epigenetic because changes in DNA sequences are not involved. Histone acetylation emerges as a central switch that allows interconversion between permissive and repressive chromatin domains in terms of transcriptional competence. The mechanisms underlying the histone acetylation-dependent control of gene expression include a direct effect on the stability of nucleosomal arrays and the creation of docking sites for the binding of regulatory proteins. Histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases are, respectively, the enzymes devoted to the addition and removal of acetyl groups from lysine residues on the histone N-terminal tails. The enzymes exert fundamental roles in developmental processes and their deregulation has been linked to the progression of diverse human disorders, including cancer.

Acetylation↗

C/EBPbeta-2 confers EGF-independent growth and disrupts the normal acinar architecture of human mammary epithelial cells.

BACKGROUND: The transcription factor, C/EBPbeta, is a key regulator of growth and differentiation in the mammary gland. There are three different protein isoforms of C/EBPbeta. C/EBPbeta-1 and -2 are transactivators, and differ by only 23 N-terminal amino acids present in beta-1 only. C/EBPbeta-3 (LIP) lacks the transactivation domain and represses transcription. Elevated C/EBPbeta-2 expression causes MCF10A normal human mammary epithelial cells to become transformed, undergo an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), and acquire an invasive phenotype. C/EBPbeta is a downstream transcriptional target of Ras signaling pathways and is required for Ras transformation of some cell types. Ras signaling pathways are activated in mammary epithelial cells by the ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase family. Therefore, we considered whether elevated C/EBPbeta-2 expression would resemble ErbB RTK activation in MCF10A cells. RESULTS: We show that elevated C/EBPbeta-2 expression confers EGF-independent growth in MCF10A mammary epithelial cells. However, MCF10A cells expressing C/EBPbeta-3 are not EGF-independent, and high C/EBPbeta-3 or LIP expression is incompatible with growth. C/EBPbeta-2 overexpression disrupts the normal acinar architecture of MCF10A cells in basement membrane cultures and induces complex multiacinar structures with filled lumen, similar to the consequences of aberrant ErbB2 activation. CONCLUSION: Given the ability of C/EBPbeta-2 to confer EGF-independent growth to mammary epithelial cells as well as its capability for disrupting normal epithelial architecture and causing EMT, it is worth considering whether inhibitors which target ErbB family signaling pathways could be less effective in mammary epithelial cells with elevated nuclear C/EBPbeta-2 expression.

CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-beta↗

ERH (enhancer of rudimentary homologue), a conserved factor identical between frog and human, is a transcriptional repressor.

Drosophila enhancer of rudimentary [e(r)] interacts genetically with the rudimentary gene, which encodes a protein possessing the first three enzymatic activities of the pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway. A regulatory or enzymatic activity of e(r) in pyrimidine biosynthesis and the cell cycle has been suggested, but nothing is known about its molecular function. The factor is evolutionarily highly conserved since homologues exist in plants and mammals. We cloned the Xenopus enhancer of rudimentary homologue (XERH) as an interaction partner of DCoH/PCD (dimerisation cofactor of HNF1/pterin-4alpha-carbinolamine dehydratase) in the yeast two-hybrid assay. DCoH/PCD is a multifunctional factor originally identified as a positive cofactor of the HNF1 homeobox transcription factors. XERH is a 104 amino acid protein that is identical to its mammalian homologues. The mRNA is expressed maternally, enriched in ectodermal derivatives during development and ubiquitously detectable in the adult. Fused to the DNA binding region of the GAL4 transcription factor domain, XERH represses the activity of a GAL4 responsive reporter in HeLa, but not in NIH3T3 cells. Furthermore, the DCoH/PCD coactivation of a HNF1 responsive reporter is inhibited by XERH. We propose that XERH is a cell type-specific transcriptional repressor, probably interfering with HNF1-dependent gene regulation via DCoH/PCD.

Animals↗

Histone H1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibits transcriptional silencing.

Eukaryotic genomes contain euchromatic regions, which are transcriptionally active, and heterochromatic regions, which are repressed. These domains are separated by "barrier elements": DNA sequences that protect euchromatic regions from encroachment by neighboring heterochromatin. To identify proteins that play a role in the function of barrier elements we have carried out a screen in S. cerevisiae. We recovered the gene HHO1, which encodes the yeast ortholog of histone H1, as a high-copy modifier of barrier activity. Histone H1 is a linker histone that binds the outside of nucleosomes and modifies chromatin dynamics. Here we show that Hho1p reinforces the action of several types of barrier elements, and also inhibits silencing on its own.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A retrovirus-like zinc domain is essential for translational repression of bacteriophage T4 gene 32.

Gene 32 protein (gp32), a single-stranded DNA-binding protein from bacteriophage T4, contains a zinc-binding subdomain with sequence homologies to the 3-cysteine/1-histidine zinc-binding motif found in a variety of retroviruses and plant viruses. In vitro studies suggest that autoregulation of gp32 occurs at the level of translation by gp32 specifically binding gene 32 mRNA at an unusual stem-loop structure that can be modeled as an RNA pseudoknot. Nucleation of gp32 binding via this pseudoknot is thought to be needed to facilitate cooperative binding of gp32 through a largely unstructured region that overlaps the ribosome binding site (McPheeters, D. S., Stormo, G. D., and Gold, L. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 201, 517-535). Removal of Zn(II) from gp32 results in a protein that retains the ability to bind single-stranded RNA with high affinity but is unable to specifically autoregulate itself at the level of translation. Deletion of the pseudoknot sequences from the gene 32 autoregulatory region results in an mRNA that cannot be repressed by gp32. These results suggest that the zinc-binding subdomain of gp32 plays an essential role in autoregulation by providing a critical element necessary for nucleating cooperative binding at the gene 32 mRNA pseudoknot.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A region in the steroid binding domain determines formation of the non-DNA-binding, 9 S glucocorticoid receptor complex.

This work was initiated to determine if a specific region of the glucocorticoid receptor determines the formation of the inactive (i.e. non-DNA-binding) 9 S form of the receptor recovered in cytosol preparations. It is known that the murine glucocorticoid receptor of the nti phenotype, which consists of only the carboxyl-terminal 40-kDa peptide containing the DNA-binding and steroid-binding domains separated by a short linker region, is recovered in hypotonic lysates as a 9 S heteromeric complex (Gehring, U., and Arndt, H. (1985) FEBS Lett. 179, 138-142). To further localize the domain required for formation of the 9 S complex, we have determined the sedimentation coefficients of receptors produced in COS-7 cells transfected with several mutants of the human glucocorticoid receptor gene. Deletion of the DNA-binding domain results in a 9 S complex that is somewhat less stable than the wild type receptor during sucrose gradient centrifugation. Deletion of the linker region yields a molybdate-stabilized 9 S complex, but deletion of the entire steroid-binding domain or internal deletion of the amino-terminal two-thirds of this domain yields receptors that are constitutive transcriptional activators and are present in cytosol only in the 4 S form. Taken together, these observations demonstrate that the steroid-binding domain contains the features required for formation of the 9 S heteromeric complex, and they are consistent with the proposal that the steroid-binding domain normally represses receptor function.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Differential Crosslinking and Contractile Motors Drive Nuclear Chromatin Compaction.

During interphase, a typical cell nucleus features spatial compartmentalization of transcriptionally active euchromatin and repressed heterochromatin domains. In conventional nuclear organization, euchromatin predominantly occupies the nuclear interior, while heterochromatin, which is approximately 50% more dense than euchromatin, is positioned near the nuclear periphery. Peripheral chromatin organization can be further modulated by the nuclear lamina, which is itself a deformable structure. While a number of biophysical mechanisms for compartmentalization within rigid nuclei have been explored, we study a chromatin model consisting of an active, crosslinked polymer tethered to a deformable, polymeric lamina shell. Contractile motors, the deformability of the shell, and the spatial distribution of crosslinks all play pivotal roles in this compartmentalization. We find that a radial crosslink density distribution, even with a small linear differential of higher crosslinking density at the edge of the nucleus, combined with contractile motor activity, drives genomic segregation, in agreement with experimental observations. This arises from contractile motors preferentially drawing crosslinks into their vicinity at the nuclear periphery, forming high-density domains that promote heterochromatin formation. We also find an increased stiffness of nuclear wrinkles given the preferential heterochromatin compaction below the lamina shell, which is consistent with instantaneous nuclear stiffening under applied nanoindentation. We conclude with the potential for experimental validation of our model predictions.

Journal Article↗

ErbB-4 s80 intracellular domain abrogates ETO2-dependent transcriptional repression.

ErbB-4 is cleaved by alpha- and gamma-secretases to release a soluble 80-kDa intracellular domain, termed s80, which translocates to the nucleus. s80 is present in the nucleus of normal and cancerous mammary cells and is predicted to have a role in cell differentiation. To further investigate the mechanism by which s80 may mediate differentiation, we tested whether s80 regulates Eto2, a transcriptional corepressor that is involved in erythrocyte differentiation and is also implicated in human breast cancer. Here we show that ligand binding to ErbB-4 causes s80 translocation to the nucleus, where it colocalizes and interacts with Eto2. Expression of s80 blocks Eto2-mediated transcriptional repression of a heterologous promoter. This effect on Eto2 does not require s80 kinase activity and is mediated by the carboxyl-terminal region of s80. Although other cell surface receptors regulate transcription by activating signal transduction cascades, these data present a novel mechanism of corepressor regulation and suggest a role for Eto2 in ErbB-4-dependent differentiation.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

Vibrio cholerae H-NS domain structure and function with respect to transcriptional repression of ToxR regulon genes reveals differences among H-NS family members.

H-NS is an abundant bacterial protein involved in transcriptional silencing of a variety of environmentally responsive genes during growth under non-permissive conditions. We have previously demonstrated a direct role for H-NS in the negative modulation of expression of several genes within the ToxR virulence regulon of Vibrio cholerae. Here we have undertaken extensive mutagenesis of the structural and functional domains of the H-NS protein to determine the contribution of each to the regulation of gene expression. Insertions within, or truncations of, the C-terminal conserved DNA-binding domain prevent repression of toxT and ctx, as expected. Dominant negative experiments demonstrate that V. cholerae H-NS represses gene expression as an oligomeric protein. Hydrophobic coiledcoil interactions have been shown to provide oligomerization capability in other H-NS orthologues. We used site-directed mutagenesis to construct altered V. cholerae H-NS proteins, including an extensive internal deletion within the predicted coiledcoil domain. Remarkably, these proteins were competent to repress gene expression and to form oligomers. Chimeric H-NS proteins, using sequences from both Escherichia coli and V. cholerae H-NS orthologues, revealed that V. cholerae H-NS possesses a second oligomerization domain in the N-terminal 24 amino acids of the protein. Overall, our results suggest DNA binding and protein oligomerization, provided by either the central coiledcoil or N-terminal domain, are required for repression of promoters responsive to H-NS within the ToxR regulon.

Bacterial Proteins↗

A domain of the even-skipped protein represses transcription by preventing TFIID binding to a promoter: repression by cooperative blocking.

We examined the mechanism by which the C-terminal 236 amino acids of the even-skipped protein (region CD) repress transcription. A fusion protein, CDGB, was created that contains region CD fused to the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain. This protein repressed transcription in an in vitro system containing purified fractions of the RNA polymerase II general transcription factors, and repression was dependent upon the presence of high-affinity glucocorticoid receptor binding sites in the promoter. Repression by CDGB was prevented when the promoter DNA was preincubated with TFIID or TBP, whereas preincubation of the template DNA with CDGB prevented TFIID binding. Together, these results strongly imply that CDGB represses transcription by inhibiting TFIID binding, and further experiments suggested a mechanism by which this may occur. Region CD can mediate cooperative interactions between repressor molecules such that molecules bound at the glucocorticoid receptor binding sites stabilize binding of additional CDGB molecules to low-affinity binding sites throughout the basal promoter. Binding to some of these low-affinity sites was shown to contribute to repression. Further experiments suggested that the full-length eve protein also represses transcription by the same mechanism. We speculate that occupancy of secondary sites within the basal promoter by CDGB or the eve protein inhibits subsequent TFIID binding to repress transcription, a mechanism we term cooperative blocking.

Animals↗

Hunchback-independent silencing of late Ubx enhancers by a Polycomb Group Response Element.

Drosophila homeotic genes are kept silent outside of their appropriate expression domains by a repressive chromatin complex formed by the Polycomb Group proteins. In the case of the Ubx gene, it has been proposed that the early repressor HB, binding at enhancers, recruits the Polycomb complex and specifies the domain of repression. We show that some Ubx enhancers are activated after blastoderm. If a Polycomb Response Element (PRE) is combined with such late enhancers, repression of a reporter gene can be established everywhere in the embryo, irrespective of the presence or absence of hunchback protein. If, however, these late enhancers are combined with a Ubx early enhancer, as well as a PRE, repression is established only where the reporter gene was inactive at early stages. These results imply that the Polycomb complex is not dependent on hunchback and suggest that the pattern of silencing reflects rather the state of activity of the gene at the time the Polycomb complex is formed.

Animals↗

The leukemia-associated gene TEL encodes a transcription repressor which associates with SMRT and mSin3A.

The E-26 transforming specific (ETS)-related gene TEL, also known as ETV6, encodes a strong transcription repressor that is rearranged in several recurring chromosomal rearrangements associated with leukemia and congenital fibrosarcoma. The TEL protein contains two functional domains that have been partially characterized: a helix-loop-helix (HLH) domain (also known as a pointed domain) at the N-terminus, which physically interacts with itself, with the SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9, and with FLI1; and, at the C-terminus, an ETS domain with DNA-binding properties. Little is known about the function of the central region of TEL. The HLH domain and the central region of TEL are consistently maintained in the t(12;21), which is the most frequent chromosomal translocation involving TEL. In this study, we found that the HLH domain and the central region of TEL mediate transcription repression by two distinct mechanisms. The central region involves the recruitment of a repression complex, including SMRT and mSin3A. The HLH domain represses gene transcription through a mechanism that is independent of known corepressors. Thus, TEL belongs to a growing number of transcription factors rearranged by chromosomal translocations that are associated with the corepressor complexes.

3T3 Cells↗

Molecular determinants for targeting heterochromatin protein 1-mediated gene silencing: direct chromoshadow domain-KAP-1 corepressor interaction is essential.

The KRAB domain is a highly conserved transcription repression module commonly found in eukaryotic zinc finger proteins. KRAB-mediated repression requires binding to the KAP-1 corepressor, which in turn recruits members of the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family. The HP1 proteins are nonhistone chromosomal proteins, although it is unclear how they are targeted to unique chromosomal domains or promoters. In this report, we have reconstituted and characterized the HP1-KAP-1 interaction using purified proteins and have compared KAP-1 to three other known HP1 binding proteins: SP100, lamin B receptor (LBR), and the p150 subunit from chromatin assembly factor (CAF-1 p150). We show that the chromoshadow domain (CSD) of HP1 is a potent repression domain that binds directly to all four previously described proteins. For KAP-1, we have mapped the CSD interaction region to a 15-amino-acid segment, termed the HP1BD, which is also present in CAF-1 p150 but not SP100 or LBR. The region of KAP-1 harboring the HP1BD binds as a monomer to a dimer of the CSD, as revealed by gel filtration, analytical ultracentrifugation, and optical biosensor analyses. The use of a spectrum of amino acid substitutions in the human HP1alpha CSD revealed a strong correlation between CSD-mediated repression and binding to KAP-1, CAF-1 p150, and SP100 but not LBR. Differences among the HP1 binding partners could also be discerned by fusion to a heterologous DNA binding domain and by the potential to act as dominant negative molecules. Together, these results strongly suggest that KAP-1 is a physiologically relevant target for HP1 function.

3T3 Cells↗