Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “POPULAR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources

Popular sweetner sucralose as a migraine trigger.

Sucralose (trichlorogalactosucrose, or better known as Splenda) is an artificial sweetener from native sucrose that was approved by the FDA on April 1, 1998 (April Fool's Day). This observation of a potential causal relationship between sucralose and migraines may be important for physicians to remember this can be a possible trigger during dietary history taking. Identifying further triggers for migraine headaches, in this case sucralose, may help alleviate some of the cost burden (through expensive medical therapy or missed work opportunity) as well as provide relief to migraineurs.

Humans↗

Possible effects of the popular and medical recognition of bulimia nervosa.

Historical changes in psychological symptoms are analysed not only from a social causation approach but also from a labelling perspective. Modern eating disorders lend themselves to such an analysis because of their historical variability. Effects of the introduction and dispersion of the psychiatric concept of 'bulimia nervosa' at normal body weight and its propagation through the mass media are examined (relying on Devereux's model of 'ethnic disorders'). Data of an exploratory interview study with 39 bulimic patients evaluated along these lines (a) indicate that the recognition of bulimia has facilitated seeking of professional and non-professional help, (b) invite categorization of bulimic behaviour implying less self-blame, (c) render imitation of bulimia more probable, and (d) covary with less secretive illness behaviour indicating a broadening of underlying motivations.

Adolescent↗

Analysis of body segment parameter differences between four human populations and the estimation errors of four popular mathematical models.

Calculating the kinetics of motion using inverse or forward dynamics methods requires the use of accurate body segment inertial parameters. The methods available for calculating these body segment parameters (BSPs) have several limitations and a main concern is the applicability of predictive equations to several different populations. This study examined the differences in BSPs between 4 human populations using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), developed linear regression equations to predict mass, center of mass location (CM) and radius of gyration (K) in the frontal plane on 5 body segments and examined the errors produced by using several BSP sources in the literature. Significant population differences were seen in all segments for all populations and all BSPs except hand mass, indicating that population specific BSP predictors are needed. The linear regression equations developed performed best overall when compared to the other sources, yet no one set of predictors performed best for all segments, populations or BSPs. Large errors were seen with all models which were attributed to large individual differences within groups. Equations which account for these differences, including measurements of limb circumferences and breadths may provide better estimations. Geometric models use these parameters, however the models examined in this study did not perform well, possibly due to the assumption of constant density or the use of an overly simple shape. Creating solids which account for density changes or which mimic the mass distribution characteristics of the segment may solve this problem. Otherwise, regression equations specific for populations according to age, gender, race, and morphology may be required to provide accurate estimations of BSPs for use in kinetic equations of motion.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Hazards of horse-riding as a popular sport.

The increasing incidence of horse-riding accidents, which are often severe in nature, prompted a pilot study of a questionnaire designed to elucidate the cause of such accidents. It was hoped that, on a larger scale, the information gleaned would highlight possible preventative measures which might improve the safety of an important recreational pursuit enjoyed by young and old from many walks of life. A retrospective study of riders sustaining serious spinal injuries admitted to Stoke Mandeville Hospital was compared with riders sustaining minor but significant injuries as the accidents came to the attention of the authors. The detailed analysis paid particular attention to the setting and to the experience and task of horse and rider. It was found that 70% of the 20 accidents could be thought attributable to the behaviour of the horse at the time, and seven of these were in the spinal injuries group. Rider error was a significant contribution in seven cases, and in two instances the rider was under instruction at the time. There was also inadequate experience of the rider in seven cases, of which five were thought to show inadequate supervision. The limited number of cases studied precludes significant observations, but, as the majority of accidents seemed preventable, a larger study has been initiated in collaboration with the British Horse Society.

Adult↗