Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “External Fixators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources

Assessment of external fixator reusability using load- and cycle-dependent tests.

No standard method has been established for investigating repeated use of an external fixator. The purpose of the current study was to establish a fatigue testing method for assessing fixator frame reuse. A unilateral DynaFix trade mark external fixator system was tested using high-load and low-cycle (900-150 N at 5 Hz) and low-load and high-cycle (450-100 N at 10 Hz) tests (assumed one use of 500,000 and 1 million cycles, respectively). These loading conditions were selected to simulate single clinical use and to satisfy Food and Drug Administration requirements. In the high-load low-cycle test, substantial failure of the serrated joint occurred before completion of the first simulated use. In the low-load high-cycle test, all fixators completed three simulated clinical uses without failure, although (1/4) of the serrated joint components had hairline cracks. The high-load low-cycle test identified the fixator components which should be examined and replaced if reuse of the fixator is to be considered. Wear and deformation of the set screw on the rotary joint and telescoping mechanisms were observed in the low-load high-cycle test but not in the high-load low-cycle test. Therefore, if the unilateral DynaFix trade mark fixators are being considered for reusability, the number of reuses should be limited as the whole structure of the device will experience fatigue damage as the loading cycle increases.

Analysis of Variance↗

Plaster cast versus external fixation for unstable intraarticular Colles' fractures.

This study compares 75 consecutive patients with Frykman Type VIII fractures of the distal forearm treated by primary external fixation with 32 patients who sustained similar injuries and were treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization. The latter group of patients served as an historical control. The two groups were similar with respect to injury and demographic characteristics. All fractures treated with external fixation remained well reduced and aligned, whereas 88% of those treated with casts had unsatisfactory alignment despite the fact that 30% had a second reduction. The external fixator group also had superior results with respect to functional outcome, range of motion, and grip strength.

Adult↗

External fixation as an alternative when treating 2nd and 3rd degree open lower leg fractures.

The infection rate of open lower leg fracture is extremely high. Surgical treatment guarantees a reduced risk of infection when compared with conservative treatments. But even osteosynthetic methods such as screw or compression plate fixation show unsatisfactory results because of the additional traumatization of the primarily injured soft tissue combined with a reduction of blood circulation. From July 1973 till September 1976 we treated 57 2nd and 3rd degree open shank fractures with osteosynthetic methods: 46 with compression plate osteosynthesis and 11 primarily or secondarily with external fixation. The osteitis-rate was 14%, in addition to that there was a soft-tissue infection rate of 5%. In order to change our therapeutical procedure we stabilized 2nd and 3rd degree open lower limb fractures and lower leg fractures complicated by soft-tissue damages consequently by external fixation. From October 1976 till May 1978 we treated 39 open shank fractures; 24 of them were 2nd and 3rd degree open fractures. They were treated by external fixation. This change in our surgical treatment resulted in an osteitis-rate of 2.6%, there was no case of soft-tissue inflammation. These results underline the superiority of treating 2nd and 3rd degree open lower leg fractures and fractures combined with soft-tissue injuries consequently and chiefly with AO external fixation.

Bone Plates↗

External fixation techniques for distal radius fractures.

UNLABELLED: Fractures of the distal radius are common injuries. Low-energy or high-energy mechanisms may be involved. Unstable distal radius fractures present a challenge to the treating orthopaedic surgeon. External fixation is a valuable instrument for fracture reduction and stabilization. Limited open incisions, early range of motion, and treatment of complex wounds are a few of the benefits of external fixation. Fixators may be spanning or nonbridging and may be used alone or in combination with other stabilization methods to obtain and maintain distal radius fracture reduction. Augmentation with percutaneous wires allows for optimal fracture stabilization with physiologic alignment of the wrist. Moderate distraction at the carpus does not induce postoperative stiffness. The distal radioulnar joint must be assessed and may need to be stabilized. Complications of external fixation are usually minor, but must be anticipated and treated early. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (expert opinion).

Aftercare↗

External fixation or a cast for Colles' fracture.

Function and radiographic position were evaluated 2.5 years after a displaced distal radial fracture had been reduced and treated by external fixation in 40 patients as compared with immobilization in a below-the-elbow cast in 91 patients. Wrist function was better after external fixation associated with less residual displacement. The frequency of arthrosis was the same in both series. The rate of complications after external fixation was higher than after immobilization in a plaster cast, notably sensory disturbances in the thumb. This complication can probably be eliminated by modifying the surgical technique.

Adult↗

The role of ring external fixation in Charcot foot arthropathy.

These two morbidly obese patients with severe Charcot foot arthropathy were treated successfully with percutaneous correction of their deformity followed by a stepwise application of a pre-assembled neutrally aligned multiplane ring external fixator. This technique transfers well to the trauma environment in which alignment can be maintained without further violation within the zone of injury. The application of the fine wire ring external fixation has been used for many years to accomplished leg lengthening and correction of deformity. Historically it has required a great deal of experience to apply to complex frames and implement the required daily adjustments. The patient experience often has been an unpleasant ordeal with a high potential for associated morbidity. This negative exposure has prompted practicing orthopedic surgeons to avoid this technique, feeling that it best be left to those in tertiary care setting who are equipped to handle the morbidity and complications. Taking this technology from the domain of the deformity surgeon to the general orthopedic community will require the suppression of bad memories from residency. Using the device solely as a method of maintaining alignment eliminates many of the dynamic attributes that contributes to pain and morbidity. The bone and soft tissues are not stretched, eliminating much of the pain and decreasing the rate of traction-associated pin tract morbidity. Because there is no dynamic of the treatment, the simplified frame can be pre-assembled and have no adjustable components. The experience derived from this application has the potential of expanding the role of ring external fixation. Where the ring has been used previously as method of both obtaining and maintaining alignment, this application uses a simplified neutral version of a complex device to simply maintain alignment in a high risk patient population. Correction of deformity and achieving alignment/reduction of fractures is well within the domain of practicing orthopedic surgeon. Once that correction has been achieved, this application simply maintains that correction. It helps avoid extensive surgical dissection in a poor host and eliminates the need for bone that is mechanically capable of holding internal fixation devices during the bony and soft tissue healing period.

Adult↗

The use of external fixators: a review of literature and experiences in a developing world.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of external fixation devices has brought significant improvement in the management of complex open fractures. Its importance and versatility ranges from its use as temporary fixation device in fractures with soft tissue and vascular injuries to its use in definitive correction of limb length deformities and congenital malformations. It avoids extensive soft tissue damage and enhances easy management of associated soft tissue injuries. METHOD: This was an overview of the clinical experience at the University of Calabar Teaching hospital and a review of literature. RESULT: The paper highlight the usefulness of external fixation devices and the need to encourage its use in the developing world. It also stresses the constraints encountered in a Nigerian teaching hospital. CONCLUSION: A call is made to all surgeons particularly those in rural areas to make use of this simple appliances after due training. Government should equip the hospitals with these tools and encourage the fabrication of such in our environment.

Developing Countries↗

General theory and principles of external fixation.

Starting with a review of the capabilities and main complications of external fixators, this paper shows how advances made during the past two decades have rendered the method safe, reliable, and predictable. Improved component designs, new techniques of pin care, the discovery of three basic concepts that govern the safe and effective application of pin and ring fixators, and the recognition that preoperative and long-term planning are crucial to the success of the method have made external fixation the most adaptable, versatile, and gentle method for stabilizing complex injuries of soft tissue and bone.

Bone Nails↗

Fusion of the septic ankle: experience with 15 cases using hybrid external fixation.

BACKGROUND: In cases of septic joint destruction, an unfavorable situation of soft tissues and chronic osteomyelitis are responsible for high failure rates of ankle fusions. We wanted to evaluate the control of infection and the fusion rate using hybrid external fixators for the fusion of the septic ankle in a prospective study. METHODS: From 1996 to 1998, 15 arthrodeses were performed using hybrid external fixators. All patients had a combination of bone and soft tissue infections. Fourteen patients suffered from sequelae of posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and one patient suffered from rheumatoid arthritis. In 14 patients, pathogens could be identified; in 87%, Staphylococcus aureus was found. Eight patients had relevant concomitant diseases. RESULTS: The preservation of limbs by solid tibiotalar fusion was achieved in 14 patients (93%). One patient maintained an infected pseudarthrosis. During the 12-month follow-up, three patients had a fistula that persisted, with two patients having a solid arthrodesis. Full weight-bearing was possible for all the patients with a successful fusion. Seventy-five percent of the patients that had not retired at the time of the study regained their fitness for work. CONCLUSION: The hybrid external fixator presents a successful alternative for those arthrodeses of ankle joints where complications such as bone/joint infections or poor soft tissue conditions occur.

Adult↗

External fixation and infection of soft tissues close to fracture localization.

We evaluated the method of external fixation for stabilization of unstable closed and open first-degree diaphyseal fractures of long bones of lower extremities in 19 patients with infections of soft tissues close to the fracture location. The results are compared with those of another group (n = 392) of patients, with similar fractures without infections close to the fracture site, treated with inner stabilization methods. In the first group of patients, we noticed postoperative osteitis of the tibia in two cases (10%), but no pseudarthrosis or lesions of important blood vessels. In the second group of patients, the incidence of postoperative osteitis was 8.6% (n = 34) and the incidence of pseudarthrosis was 2% (n = 8). Among these patients, three lesions of important blood vessels were diagnosed. Our conclusion is that when the method of external fixation is used in combination with skillful operative techniques, the infection of soft tissues near the fracture location has no principal influence on the frequency of osteitis.

Croatia↗

Use of an aiming device for application of a type-II (bilateral) external fixator to a fractured tibia of a dog.

An aiming device was used to guide insertion of fixation pins in a type-II (bilateral) external fixator stabilizing an open canine tibial fracture. This device, designed by the Swiss AO group, has multiple applications in orthopedic surgery, because it accurately locates the exit point of a pin or drill hole on the far side of a bone or fractured bone fragment. When used with the type-II external fixator, it greatly facilitates pin placement by ensuring that, as a pin emerges from the bone, it is in line with the second clamp on the opposite connecting bar.

Acute Disease↗

Unreamed intramedullary nail versus external fixation in grade III open tibial fractures.

BACKGROUND: The optimum method for skeletal stabilization of severe open fractures of the tibial shaft remains controversial. METHODS: We compared the results of the AO unreamed tibial nail (URTN) with external fixation (Ex-Fix) in the treatment of patients with a grade III injury of the tibial diaphysis. Thirty patients were retrospectively reviewed, with a mean follow-up of 25 months (range, 12-56 months). Seventeen patients were treated with external fixation (grade IIIA, 12 patients; grade IIIB, 4 patients; and grade IIIC, 1 patient) and 13 with a URTN (grade IIIA, 6 patients; grade IIIB, 6 patients; and grade IIIC, 1 patient). Both groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, fracture severity, and Injury Severity Score. RESULTS: Mean time to full weight bearing was 37.4 weeks in the Ex-Fix group versus 22.2 weeks in the URTN group (p = 0.0069, t test). Seven patients in the Ex-Fix group required further surgery for nonunion versus two in the URTN group. There were four significant pin track infections. Removal of URTN was required in one case of deep infection. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of the URTN over external fixation in the treatment of severe open tibial fractures.

Adolescent↗

The use of external fixation devices in the management of severe lower-extremity trauma and pelvic injuries in children.

Between 1977 and 1982, 17 pediatric patients ranging in age from six to 14 years were treated for injuries that required the application of a total of 20 external fixation devices. The indications for the use of external fixation devices in children include: open fractures with soft-tissue injury, unstable fractures (diaphyseal, epiphyseal, and intra-articular), "polytrauma" patients, and unstable pelvic fractures. All fractures and soft-tissue injuries healed. The usual reported complications of external fixation devices, such as pin tract infections, delayed union, and refracture, were not encountered.

Acute Disease↗

[Surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures using dynamic methods of internal and external fixation].

Pertrochanteric fractures usually occur in patients over 65 years of age, with greater loss of skeletal mass (osteoporosis). Nonsurgical methods of treatment are accompanied by relatively high lethality rate. Moreover, they do not produce satisfactory anatomical and functional results. Surgical treatment by using dynamic implants represents a method of choice in the fixation of pertrochanteric fractures. This paper presents the treatment results of 110 patients, 61 with pertrochanteric fractures, who were surgically treated by the dynamic method of internal fixation, and 49 patients who were treated by the method of external fixation. Dynamical implants enabled both dynamization and compression of the fracture in the axis of the neck, as well as the diaphysis of the femur, which lowered the risk of mechanical complications, and, at the same time, provided effective healing of the fracture, early activation, and mobilization of the patients on whom the surgery was performed. In patients infected by various diseases, for whom surgical trauma represents a life threat, the external fixation is recommended as a method of choice.

Aged↗

[Radio-radial external fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures allows for free wrist motion].

INTRODUCTION: Joint bridging external fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures restores radial length, whereas anatomic reduction of articular fragments is difficult. Immobilisation of the wrist joint is a further disadvantage. An extraarticular hybrid fixation of distal radius fractures was introduced that facilitates fracture reduction, safe retention and allows for free wrist movement. METHODS: 30 consecutive patients with extra- and intraarticular comminuted fractures of the distal radius were treated with an extraarticular radio-radial external fixation employing a modified Ilizarov hybrid fixation technique. The operative procedure is described in detail. A clinical and radiological evaluation was carried out on the first and seventh day as well as 6 weeks postoperatively after implant removal. RESULTS: Anatomic reduction was achieved in 24 cases (80%). On the first postoperative day dorsiflexion was 30%, palmar flexion was 51% and pronation/supination was 60%/70% of the uninjured side. Six weeks postoperatively all fractures united. Wrist motion of the affected side was more than 80% of the unaffected side. Neither extensor tendinitis nor pin loosening in the distal fragment did occur. CONCLUSION: The technique of extraarticular hybrid fixation is safe and reliable in the treatment of comminuted fractures of the distal radius. It allows for early wrist movement in the immediate postoperative period.

Adult↗

External fixation of the distal radius. A biomechanical study.

External fixation is a useful method of treating unstable fractures of the distal radius. There is a lack of information regarding the behaviour of mini-fixation systems, particularly under cyclical loading, which would be expected to occur at the wrist. This laboratory study was designed to investigate the mechanical characteristics of nine current fixation systems. A programme of loading was devised to mimic forces acting on the distal radius. Wooden dowel was used to mount the fixator. Distraction and compression forces were applied in an Instron rig. Displacement was monitored throughout the load programme. No fixator failed at the loads tested. The small Hoffman rectangular frame proved stiffest in compression and extension, but was heavier than other devices. A trend of progressive, permanent deformation became apparent in those fixators which contain plastic or composite materials. This feature has implications for loss of fracture reduction in the clinical setting.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Effects of one-plane and two-plane external fixation on sheep osteotomy healing and complications.

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of one-plane and two-plane external fixation in terms of successful healing, incidence of complications, and biomechanical stability in a sheep model. BACKGROUND: Rigid fixation is preferred in open and comminuted fractures with a reduced blood supply, preventing infection and healing delay, but more often a flexible device is recommended even in unfavourable healing conditions. METHODS: The left tibiae of fifteen sheep were osteotomized and laterally fixed with a four-screw unilateral fixator frame (axial stiffness 183 N/mm) to a 3 mm gap size. In 9 of 15 sheep, an additional four-screw unilateral external fixator was anterolaterally attached (total axial stiffness of both frames 388 N/mm). After sacrificing, quality of osteotomy healing was assessed by mechanical and radiological evaluations. Osteogenesis was measured using fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Two distal fractures through the pin-tracks, three non-unions and four deep infections occurred after two-plane fixation. These failures excluded, osteotomy healing showed inferior results after two-plane fixation with reduced callus formation, bone mineral content, and bending stiffness amounts, respectively. Osteogenesis was halved following two-plane fixation in the remaining sheep. CONCLUSIONS: Two-plane fixation was not sufficient to reach successful osteotomy healing in our study. While higher rigidity was expected to prevent complications, healing in this group might have been disturbed by a reduced blood supply. The optimal stabilisation for a given fracture depends on many factors, including the biomechanical and biological environment. RELEVANCE: Considering our results and the literature discussed in this manuscript, good bone healing with minor risks of infections can be achieved using an unilateral one-plane fixator with only four screws, and its application on a muscle free position like the medial and anterior site of the sheep tibia.

Animals↗

External fixation of high-energy upper extremity injuries.

Forty patients with high-energy upper extremity injuries involving the humerus and forearm bones were treated by primarye external fixation. Concomitant soft tissue or neurovascular injuries were rated by the Gustilo classification, and this rating correlated well with the final results: three fractures were Gustilo type I, two fractures were type II, and 35 were type III (IIIA, nine fractures; IIIB, eight; and IIIC, 18). Immediate external fixation, open wound treatment, delayed bone grafting, and late internal fixation led to good to excellent results in 73%. Complications were either minor (related to the external fixation and included pin loosening, 20%) or significant (osteomyelitis, 3%).

Adolescent↗