Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defibrillators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 595 records · Page 33Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Comparison of six clinically used external defibrillators in swine.

BACKGROUND: External defibrillation has long been practiced with two types of monophasic waveforms, and now four biphasic waveforms are also widely available. Although waveforms and clinical dosing protocols differ among defibrillators, no studies have adequately compared performance of the monophasic or the biphasic waveforms. This is the first study to compare defibrillation efficacy among biphasic external defibrillators, and does so as part of a study comparing all commonly available waveforms using their respective manufacturer-provided and clinically used doses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Efficacy of six waveforms was tested in 852 short-duration ventricular fibrillation episodes in 14 swine. Protocol 1: 200-J monophasic damped sine (MDS) and monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) shocks were compared to 150-J biphasic shocks in six swine at the low-impedance of these animals. Protocol 2: Four commercially available biphasic defibrillators were compared using their respective manufacturer-recommended dose protocols in eight swine at low and simulated high-impedance. At low-impedance, all biphasic shocks achieved near-perfect success, while efficacy was significantly lower for MDS (67%) and MTE (30%) shocks. In protocol 2, first-shock success rates of the four biphasic defibrillators were uniformly high (97, 100, 100, and 94%) for low-impedance shocks, and decreased for high-impedance shocks (62, 92, 82, and 64%). There were statistically significant differences in efficacy among devices. CONCLUSIONS: Commonly used MDS and MTE waveforms provide markedly dissimilar efficacies. Despite impedance-compensation schemes in biphasic defibrillators, impedance has an impact on their efficacy. At high-impedance, modest efficacy differences exist among clinically available biphasic defibrillators, reflecting differences in both waveforms and manufacturer-provided doses.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Defibrillation waveform and post-shock rhythm in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: The importance of the defibrillation waveform on the evolving post-shock cardiac rhythm is uncertain. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate cardiac rhythms following the first defibrillation shock, comparing biphasic truncated exponential (BTE), monophasic damped sinusoidal (MDS), and monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) waveforms in patients experiencing out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: We reviewed the automated external defibrillator (AED) and emergency medical services (EMS) records of 366 patients who suffered OHCA and were treated with defibrillation shocks by first-tier emergency responders between 1 January 1999 and 31 August 2002 in King County, Washington. The post first shock rhythms were determined at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 s and compared according to defibrillation waveform. RESULTS: The MDS and BTE waveforms were associated with significantly higher frequency of defibrillation than the MTE waveform, though only the BTE association persisted to 30 and 60 s. No difference in defibrillation rates was detected between MDS and BTE waveforms. By 60 s, an organized rhythm was present in a greater proportion for BTE (40.0%) compared with MDS (25.4%, P=0.01) or MTE (26.5%, P=0.07). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort investigation, MDS and BTE waveforms had higher first shock defibrillation rates than the MTE waveform, while patients treated with the BTE waveform were more likely to develop an organized rhythm within 60 s of the initial shock. The results of this investigation, however, do not provide evidence that these surrogate advantages are important for improving survival. Additional investigation is needed to improve the understanding of the role of waveform and its potential interaction with other clinical factors in order to optimize survival in OHCA.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Do pulse checks cause a significant delay in the initial defibrillation sequence?

This study was undertaken to determine if checking for a pulse between initial defibrillations causes a clinically significant delay in the administration of the defibrillations. Ten emergency department nurses and 10 emergency medicine resident physicians were timed delivering three successive defibrillations (200, 300 and 360 J) to a manikin under three randomly assigned scenarios: (1) without pulse checks; (2) with pulse checks performed by an assistant; and (3) with pulse checks performed by the participant. All participants performed the three defibrillation scenarios using three different models of defibrillators. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare mean defibrillation times for the three scenarios. The mean time was 20.4 +/- 1.0 s for defibrillation without pulse checks; 20.2 +/- 1.2 s with pulse checks by an assistant and 22.0 +/- 2.0 s with pulse checks by the participant. There was a statistically significant difference between no pulse checks and pulse checks by the participant. No statistically significant difference was noted between no pulse checks and pulse checks by an assistant. We conclude that checking for a pulse does cause a statistically significant delay in the administration of defibrillations. This difference, however, is not likely to be clinically relevant.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1997

Rhythm changes during resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation in relation to delay until defibrillation, number of shocks delivered and survival.

AIM: To describe rhythm changes during the initial phase of resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation in relation to the interval between collapse and defibrillation, to survival and to bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). PATIENTS: All patients who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between 1980 and 1992, who were reached by the emergency medical service system (EMS), in whom resuscitation attempts were initiated and who were found in ventricular fibrillation. RESULTS: In all, 1216 patients were included in the study. Among patients who converted to a pulse-generating rhythm after the first defibrillation (n = 119) were 56% discharged from hospital as compared with 6% among patients who converted to asystole. The corresponding figures after the third defibrillation were 49% and 2%, respectively, and after the fifth defibrillation 28% and 7%, respectively. Among patients in whom the first defibrillation took place less than 5 min after collapse, 28% directly converted to a pulse-generating rhythm as compared with 3% when the first defibrillation took place 12 min or more after collapse. CONCLUSION: Among patients who suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and are found in ventricular fibrillation, there is a strong relationship between survival and initial rhythm changes after defibrillation. These rhythm changes are directly related to the interval between collapse and the first defibrillation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients.

OBJECTIVE: Following out-of-hospital defibrillation attempts, electrocardiographic instability challenges accurate assessment of defibrillation efficacy and post-shock rhythm. Presently, there is no precise definition of defibrillation efficacy in the out-of-hospital setting that is consistently used. The objective of this study was to characterize out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rhythms following low-energy biphasic and high-energy monophasic shocks in order to precisely define defibrillation efficacy and establish uniform criteria for the evaluation of shock performance. METHODS: Automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) delivering 150 J impedance-compensating biphasic or 200-360 J monophasic damped sine waveform shocks were observed in a combined police and paramedic program. ECGs from 29 biphasic patients and 87 monophasic patients were classified as organized, asystole or VF at post-shock times of 3, 5, 10, 20 and 60 s. RESULTS: Post-shock time (P<0.0001) and shock waveform type (P = 0.02) affected the classification of post-shock rhythm. At each analysis time, there were more patients in VF following high-energy monophasic shocks than following 150 J biphasic shocks (P<0.0001). The percentage of patients in VF increased with post-shock time. The rate of VF recurrence was not a function of shock type, indicating that refibrillation is largely a function of the patient's underlying cardiac disease. CONCLUSION: Defibrillation should uniformly be defined as termination of VF for a minimum of 5-s after shock delivery. Rhythms should be reported at 5-s after shock delivery to assess early effects of the defibrillation shock and at 60-s after shock delivery to assess the interaction of the defibrillation therapy and factors such as post-shock myocardial dysfunction and the patient's underlying cardiac disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

New concepts in transthoracic defibrillation.

The transition of biphasic waveforms from ICDs to external defibrillators constitutes a significant technological advances for transthoracic defibrillation. Impedance compensation has enabled the delivery of defibrillating current adapted to each patient and each shock in the same patient. Optimally designed biphasic waveforms have been shown clinically to have greater efficacy in the termination of VF when compared with monophasic waveforms, and because peak current delivery is less, these waveforms are likely to be less injurious to myocardial function. Advances in the understanding of the mechanisms of fibrillation and defibrillation have identified the electrophysiologic events that initiate and sustain VF and the effects of defibrillation shocks on those events. Definition of the role of VEP and postshock excitation has clarified the mechanisms by which shocks can either fail or succeed. The ability of the second phase of optimal biphasic waveform shocks to exploit recruited sodium channels in negatively polarized areas and thus induce rapid propagation of postshock excitation assures uniform depolarization and prevention of re-entry. This appears to be the major mechanism of greater efficacy of biphasic waveforms. It seems certain that continuing investigation of virtual electrodes will enhance our understanding of defibrillation and optimal waveforms. At the same time, much more needs to be known regarding translation of these experimental observations to mechanisms of defibrillation in human hearts with long-standing underlying structural heart disease, which often arises of multiple factors. This represents a major challenge in defibrillation research.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation thresholds in sheep and dogs.

Ventricular defibrillation studies normally use dogs rather than other large species. To investigate the suitability of sheep, which are often cheaper and more readily available, we compared ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation thresholds (VFT, DFT) in sheep and dogs. A total of 12 sheep (31 +/- 5 kg) and six dogs (19 +/- 1 kg) were anesthetised with halothane. Fibrillation was induced via epicardial pacing leads, using a 1 s 50 Hz pulse. Biphasic defibrillation shocks were delivered across epicardial patches. Voltage-response curves for both fibrillation and defibrillation were generated. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine 50 and 90% probability of success for fibrillation induction and defibrillation. VFT was similar in sheep and dogs. DFT at 50% probability of success was significantly higher in sheep (369 +/- 14 V) than in dogs (299 +/- 31 V, P < 0.04) but within each species there was no correlation between heart weight and DFT. After defibrillation sheep took longer to return to sinus rhythm than dogs and electro-mechanical dissociation was observed in sheep, but not in dogs. Thus, sheep may not be an ideal model for ventricular defibrillation research but further studies of the intrinsic differences between sheep and dogs may provide insights into basic mechanisms of defibrillation.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

The middle cardiac vein--a novel pathway to reduce the defibrillation threshold.

UNLABELLED: Defibrillation energy requirements of epicardial implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems are generally lower than endovascular systems currently used. The former has the disadvantage of requiring a thoracotomy and so has a greater morbidity and mortality than an endovascular procedure. The middle cardiac vein (MCV) is an epicardial structure that is accessible by a non-thoracotomy approach. This study investigated the merits of ventricular defibrillation from the middle cardiac vein. METHODS AND RESULTS. Defibrillation thresholds (DFT) were measured in 10 anesthetized pigs, weighing 34.5 +/- 44.1 kg (mean 39 kg). An Angeflex electrode (1.7 mm x 50 mm) was introduced via the left external jugular vein to the right ventricular apex. The MCV was identified with standard angiography techniques and a 4080 (Angeion Corp.) defibrillation electrode (1.6 mm x 65 mm) introduced into the vein. An active can was implanted in the left subpectoral region. The defibrillation thresholds (DFT) of the following defibrillation configurations were assessed using a modified four-reversal binary search: RV-->Can, RV + MCV-->Can and MCV-->Can. The DFT's for the three configurations were 15.5 +/- 2.8 J, 10.8 +/- 3.4 J and 13.7 +/- 2.4 J. Analysis of variance showed that the DFT with the RV + MCV combination was significantly less than the RV alone (p < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Defibrillation is possible through the MCV and that incorporating an electrode in the MCV with RV-Can configuration can reduce the DFT by 30%.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Minimum energy single-shock internal atrial defibrillation in sheep.

Well-tolerated internal atrial defibrillation shocks must be below the pain threshold, which has been estimated to be less than 1 Joule. Defibrillation of the atria with low energy is made possible by delivering shocks at the low end of the defibrillation dose-response curve. We studied low-energy defibrillation in sheep to test the hypothesis that the energy that defibrillates the atria 10% of the time (ED10) is less than 1 Joule. The ED10 was estimated in seven sheep with rapid pacing induced chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). Low-energy defibrillation shocks were delivered from coronary sinus (CS) to superior vena cava (SVC) and the ED10 and ED50 (energy that defibrillates the atria 50% of the time) were then calculated using logistic regression. The mean ratio of ED10 to ED50 was 0.50, indicating that on average, the ED10 was equal to half of the ED50. ED10 shocks had energies ranging from 1.2 to 5.8 Joules. These results suggest that painless single-shock low-energy defibrillation may not be feasible.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Effectiveness and safety of internal rectilinear biphasic versus monophasic defibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recently it has been shown that biphasic external shocks are more effective in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation (VF) compared with monophasic external shocks in terms of number of defibrillation attempts and maximal energy used for termination of VF. Biphasic defibrillators apply different biphasic impulse forms, depending on technology. To the authors' knowledge, there are no existing data concerning the effects of rectilinear biphasic internal shocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare monophasic with rectilinear biphasic internal shock waveforms for termination of VF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: One hundred thirty-four patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were prospectively randomized either to monophasic (group A) or biphasic (group B) internal defibrillation. Defibrillation was started with 7 J and increased stepwise to 30 J in each group until successful termination of VF after aortic declamping. The number of defibrillations, as well as the cumulative and maximal energy for termination of VF, were determined. Preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively troponin T, total creatine phosphokinase (CPK), and CPK- MB isoenzymes were measured. RESULTS: In 64 patients (47%) VF occurred. The groups consisted of 32 patients each. The number of defibrillations (1.3 +/- 0.6 v 1.9+/- 1.2; p = 0.013), maximal energy per patient (7.9 +/- 2.5 v 11.6 +/- 7.32; p = 0.006), and cumulative energy (10.1 +/-6.1 v 21.3 +/- 24.1; p = 0.016) for successful termination of VF were significantly reduced in group B. Troponin T, CPK, and CPK-MB did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate that rectilinear biphasic internal defibrillation is more effective in the treatment of VF during cardiac surgery than is monophasic defibrillation. However, no significant difference in myocardial damage could be detected between groups.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Many centers optimize their emergency medical services (EMS) systems to achieve a target defibrillation response interval of "call received by dispatch" to "arrival at scene by responder with defibrillator" in 8 minutes or less for at least 90% of cardiac arrest cases. The objective of this study was to analyze survival as a function of time to test the evidence for this standard. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included all adult, cardiac etiology, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases from phases I and II of the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) study. Patients in the 21 Ontario study communities received a basic life support level of care with defibrillation by ambulance and firefighters but no advanced life support. Survival was plotted as a function of the defibrillation response interval. The equation of the curve, generated by means of logistic regression, was used to estimate survival at various defibrillation response interval cutoff points. RESULTS: From January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1997, there were 392 (4.2%) survivors overall among the 9,273 patients treated. The defibrillation response interval mean was 6.2 minutes, and the 90th percentile was 9.3 minutes. There was a steep decrease in the first 5 minutes of the survival curve, beyond which the slope gradually leveled off. Controlling for known covariates, the decrement in the odds of survival with increasing response interval was 0.77 per minute (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.83). The survival function predicts, for successive 90th percentile cutoff points, both survival rates and additional lives saved per year in the OPALS communities compared with the 8-minute standard: 9 minutes (4.6%; -18 lives), 8 minutes (5.9%; 0 lives), 7 minutes (7.5%; 23 lives), 6 minutes (9.5%; 51 lives), and 5 minutes (12.0%; 86 lives). CONCLUSION: The 8-minute target established in many communities is not supported by our data as the optimal EMS defibrillation response interval for cardiac arrest. EMS system leaders should consider the effect of decreasing the 90th percentile defibrillation response interval to less than 8 minutes.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Transthoracic electrical impedance during external defibrillation: comparison of measured and modelled waveforms.

The transthoracic electrical impedance is an important defibrillation parameter, affecting the defibrillating current amplitude and energy, and therefore the defibrillation efficiency. A close relationship between transthoracic impedance and defibrillation success rate was observed. Pre-shock measurements (using low amplitude high frequency current) of the impedance were considered a solution for selection of adequate shock voltages or for current-based defibrillation dosage. A recent approach, called 'impedance-compensating defibrillation' was implemented, where the pulse duration was controlled with respect to the impedance measured during the initial phase of the shock. These considerations raised our interest in reassessment of the transthoracic impedance characteristics and the corresponding measurement methods. The purpose of this work is to study the variations of the transthoracic impedance by a continuous measurement technique during the defibrillation shock and comparing the data with results obtained by modelling. Voltage and current impulse waveforms were acquired during cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. The same type of defibrillation pulse was taken from dogs after induction of fibrillation. The electrodes were located in the anterior position, for both the patients and animals.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Energy requirement for early defibrillation.

The appropriate energy requirement for defibrillation of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation has been a matter of discussion. We analysed the effects of 360 J, 200 J or a combination of 200 and 360 J DC shocks given by ordinary manual defibrillators or semiautomatic defibrillators. 120 of 127 ventricular fibrillation episodes were converted by three or less 360 J DC shocks delivered by a manual defibrillator. All 28 ventricular fibrillation episodes were converted by an average of 1.9 DC shocks when 360 J were delivered by a semiautomatic defibrillator. 139 of 152 ventricular fibrillation episodes were converted by three or fewer 200 J DC shocks and 52 of 53 by 2 x 200 J followed, if needed, by 1 x 360 J DC shock delivered by the same semiautomatic defibrillator. Three or fewer 360 J DC shocks seems completely adequate for conversion of most episodes of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. There is no difference in the result of defibrillation by manual and semiautomatic defibrillators.

Bioelectric Energy Sources↗
PubMed1999

Electrical defibrillation: new technologies.

Two-thirds of deaths from coronary disease occur in the pre-hospital phase and are caused by ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, for which electrical defibrillation is the only effective treatment. The time delay between the onset of ventricular fibrillation and the administration of the first defibrillatory shock is the most important determinant for survival. To achieve the earliest defibrillation possible, rescuers others than physicians need to be able to initiate this treatment. The international scientific community strongly supports the concept of early defibrillation in the setting of a strong chain of survival. New technological developments of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) allowed the implementation of defibrillation by the first responding professional rescuer. As a consequence of the technological evolution in implantable defibrillators, much research has also been done on new defibrillation waveforms and alternative energy levels in external defibrillators. After initial animal research, human clinical investigation has shown that initial low energy (150J) nonprogressive (150J-150J-150J) impedance-adjusted biphasic waveform defibrillatory shocks for patients in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation are safe, acceptable and clinically effective. Reporting on outcome from cardiac arrest must be as uniform as possible to allow conclusions on performance of emergency medical service systems. The 'Utstein Style' nomenclature is a glossary of terms and a reporting guideline for uniform description of cardiac arrest, resuscitation, the emergency medical service (EMS) system and the outcome. Reports on experiences with AED programmes by traditional and non-traditional professional rescuers support the view that AEDs should not be implemented in EMS systems as an isolated intervention, but that efforts are equally needed to strengthen the other links of the chain of survival. The international scientific community (American Heart Association, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and European Resuscitation Council) have issued guidelines for the use of AEDs by EMS providers and first responders, and a universal treatment algorithm is proposed.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1980

Postshock arrhythmias--a possible cause of unsuccessful defibrillation.

Clinical and experimental information exists in the literature which suggests that defibrillation with higher energies than are required results in a decreased percentage of success. Previous work in this laboratory which showed the occurrence of postshock arrhythmias caused by a prolonged depolarization of the cell membrane in myocardial cells in vitro, led to the hypothesis that the decreased percent success at high energies in vivo might be due to the development of similar shock-induced arrhythmias which could immediately refibrillate the heart. The purpose of these experiments was to test this hypothesis. Myocardial cells grown in vitro were subjected to rectangular wave electric field stimulation of varying intensity and duration. Postshock arrhythmias were evaluated using a photovoltaic cell mounted on a closed-circuit television monitor. The photocell converted the change in light intensity produced as the cell contracted to an electrical signal which was read out on a strip chart. Strength-duration curves were formed both for excitation (production of a single extrasystole) and for specific degrees of arrhythmia. These were compared with strength-duration curves obtained for a specific percent success defibrillation in vivo by other investigators. These experiments showed a close similarity between the in vivo and in vitro data, thus, strengthening the hypothesis that decreasing percentage of success of defibrillation with increasing intensity at high energies is due to secondary arrhythmias produced by the shock. The experiments further suggest that in vitro myocardial cells are a valuable screening system for determining waveforms which maximize the ratio between the voltages producing postshock arrhythmias and those producing excitation (defibrillation). This ratio, defined as the "safety factor" of the waveform, varies with the duration of the rectangular wave. Durations having high safety factors can produce defibrillation with a high percentage of success; however, waveforms having low safety factors make it impossible to achieve a high percentage of success defibrillation with any applied voltage. This information suggests that the minimum voltage required for successful defibrillation always be used and that defibrillators be produced with waveforms which maximize the safety factor.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation reduces the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.

Both clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated substantial impairment of ventricular function after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Indeed, postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction has been implicated as a potentially important mechanism, accounting for fatal outcomes after successful resuscitation in 70% of victims within the first 72 hrs. Recent experimental studies implicated the total electrical energy delivered during defibrillation as an important correlate with the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction and postresuscitation survival. This prompted us to investigate the option of using lower electrical energy biphasic waveform defibrillation. We compared the effects of low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation with conventional monophasic waveform defibrillation after a short (4 mins), intermediate (7 mins), or prolonged (10 mins) interval of untreated ventricular fibrillation. Biphasic waveform defibrillation with a fixed energy of 150 joules proved to be as effective as conventional monophasic damped sine waveform defibrillation for restoration of spontaneous circulation, with significantly lower delivered energy. This was associated with significantly less severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction. The low-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation is, therefore, likely to be the future direction of transthoracic defibrillation in settings of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Reducing electrical defibrillation thresholds with glibenclamide in an isolated rabbit heart preparation.

Glibenclamide has been shown to prevent ischemia-induced shortening of action-potential duration (APD) and to prolong effective refractory period (ERP). Glibenclamide also has been shown to prolong APD under normal conditions. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that glibenclamide would prolong APD and ERP in the nonischemic heart by blocking adenosine triphosphate-sensitive K+ (K(ATP)) channels in myocardium, thus reducing defibrillation energy requirements. Hearts from 15 adult male New Zealand White rabbits, weight 3.1 +/- 0.1 kg, were perfused with a Krebs-Henseleit solution containing either no drugs (five hearts) or glibenclamide (10 hearts) at six concentrations ranging from 30 nM to 10 microM. Two 140-mm2 Pt-Ir mesh patch electrodes were sutured onto the ventricles. A 3.5/2.5-ms biphasic pulse (impedance, 95 +/- 16 omega) with randomly selected voltages of 20, 30, 50, 70, 90, or 110, defibrillated the heart after 10 s of fibrillation. The APD, ERP, fibrillation threshold (FT), and defibrillation threshold (DFT) were determined from monophasic action potentials, computer-controlled pacing, 50-Hz sinusoidal pacing, and multiple defibrillation shocks, respectively. Defibrillation thresholds were determined from a total of 180 fibrillation and defibrillation sequences, conducted in each preparation, and the results were fitted to a sigmoid dose-response curve by logistic regression analysis. Five repeated observations of APD, ERP, FT, and DFT showed no change over a 5-h period, whereas for DFT, there was a significant increase between first and next four determinations. With glibenclamide (100 and 300 nM, and 1 and 10 microM), a dose-dependent difference (p < 0.05) compared with controls was observed. There was an increase in APD, ERP, and FT and a decrease in DFT at 50% success (V50). The maximal effect for each parameter occurred at 300 nM. Glibenclamide dose-dependently reduced DFT and increased FT in an isolated nonischemic rabbit heart preparation. A probable mechanism is through APD and ERP prolongation by blocking ATP-sensitive K+ channels, suggesting that these channels may be important in modifying the APD and ERP during electrical defibrillation. This might be of particular interest in reducing electrical-defibrillation thresholds, thereby minimizing heart damage.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2004

Precountershock cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves initial response to defibrillation from prolonged ventricular fibrillation: a randomized, controlled swine study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare immediate countershocks (defibrillation 1st) with precountershock cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR 1st) for prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Thirty swine (27 +/- 1 kg). INTERVENTIONS: After 8 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, swine were randomly assigned to receive either immediate countershocks or CPR for 90 secs followed by countershocks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After the first set of shocks, nine of 15 CPR 1st animals attained return of spontaneous circulation vs. 0 of 15 defibrillation 1st animals (p <.001), and pulseless electrical activity occurred in only one of 15 CPR 1st animals vs. ten of 15 defibrillation 1st animals (p <.01). The ultimate outcomes in the two groups were not different: Return of spontaneous circulation and 24-hr survival occurred in 15 of 15 CPR 1st and 13 of 15 defibrillation 1st animals. Good neurologic outcome at 24 hrs occurred in 12 of 15 CPR 1st and nine of 15 defibrillation 1st animals. None of the animals was successfully resuscitated with defibrillation alone; all successfully resuscitated animals were provided with chest compressions during the resuscitation. The ventricular fibrillation median frequency by fast Fourier transformation decreased during the untreated ventricular fibrillation interval in both groups (9.7 +/- 0.3 Hz and 10.1 +/- 0.2 Hz after 1 min vs. 8.8 +/- 0.3 Hz and 8.9 +/- 0.5 Hz at 8 mins, respectively). Because the ventricular fibrillation median frequency substantially increased after CPR 1st, it was much higher in the CPR 1st group before the first shock (15.1 +/- 0.9 Hz vs. 8.9 +/- 0.5 Hz, p <.001). The ventricular fibrillation median frequency before the first countershock was much higher in the animals that attained return of spontaneous circulation after the first set of shocks vs. those that did not (16.1 +/- 1.3 Hz vs. 10.0 +/- 0.6 Hz, p <.0001) CONCLUSIONS: Precountershock CPR can result in substantial physiologic benefits and superior response to initial defibrillation attempts compared with immediate defibrillation in the setting of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Animals↗