Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Trials”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Rationale and design of the OPTIME CHF trial: outcomes of a prospective trial of intravenous milrinone for exacerbations of chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of an acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure (CHF) is uncertain. There is little randomized evidence available to support the various treatment strategies for patients hospitalized with an exacerbation of CHF. Inotropic agents may produce beneficial hemodynamic effects, and although they are currently used in these patients, their effect on clinical response and impact on clinical outcome is unclear. We present a unique and simple study designed to determine whether a treatment strategy for CHF exacerbations that includes an intravenous agent with inotropic properties can reduce hospital length of stay and lead to improved patient outcome. METHODS: The OPTIME CHF (Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure) trial is an ongoing multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a treatment strategy for patients with acute exacerbations of CHF. The design of this study provides a novel approach to the evaluation of treatment strategies in the care of this population. The OPTIME CHF design uses early initiation of intravenous milrinone as both an adjunct to the best the medical therapy and to facilitate optimal dosing of standard oral therapy for heart failure. Patients with known systolic heart failure requiring hospital admission for a CHF exacerbation are randomly assigned within 48 hours of admission to receive a 48-hour infusion of either intravenous milrinone or placebo. The primary end point of this design is a reduction in the total hospital days for cardiovascular events within 60 days after therapy. Enrollment of 1000 patients began July 7, 1997, at 80 US centers and is projected to conclude in late 1999.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Design of a placebo-controlled clinical trial of long-acting diltiazem and aspirin versus aspirin alone in patients receiving thrombolysis with a first acute myocardial infarction. Incomplete Infarction Trial of European Research Collaborators Evaluating Prognosis Post-Thrombolysis (diltiazem) (INTERCEPT) Research Group.

Several pharmacologic forms of adjunctive therapy, designed to enhance the efficacy of thrombolysis following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), are being explored. However, few studies have assessed the use of standard secondary prevention therapies (beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, magnesium, calcium antagonists, etc.) for antecedent thrombolysis. Although calcium antagonists have not been shown to alter post-AMI mortality, diltiazem has been shown to reduce recurrent nonfatal infarction and myocardial ischemia following non-Q-wave AMI. Because both non-Q-wave AMI and AMI treated with thrombolytic therapy result in early reperfusion and clinical manifestations of "incomplete infarction" (i.e., aborted transmural infarction), we hypothesize that prophylactic administration of diltiazem to AMI patients who receive thrombolysis before other therapies might decrease ischemic complications. We have initiated a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of long-acting diltiazem 300 mg/day and aspirin 160 mg/day versus aspirin 160 mg/day alone in up to 920 patients with an uncomplicated first AMI (no heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction) within 36 to 96 hours of receiving thrombolysis. Active enrollment is under way at 46 centers in the United Kingdom, Belgium, The Netherlands, and Denmark. This trial (known as the Incomplete INfarction Trial of European Research Collaborators Evaluating Prognosis Post-Thrombolysis [diltiazem], or INTERCEPT) represents the first long-term, large-scale, prospective study of a calcium antagonist administered post-thrombolysis as adjunctive therapy to AMI patients in which the primary trial objective is to assess the effect of blinded therapy on the 6-month cumulative occurrence of a combined clinical end point (cardiac death, recurrent nonfatal AMI, and medically refractory ischemia).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Dietary trial in prostate cancer: Early experience and implications for clinical trial design.

Much epidemiologic and case-controlled evidence suggests that diet may be a modifier of prostate cancer risk. However, the role of dietary modification in men known to have prostate cancer is a matter of some debate. To elucidate the effect of diet and comprehensive lifestyle changes on cancer risk, we are conducting a randomized, prospective clinical trial on men with clinically localized prostate cancer who have selected "watchful waiting" as primary therapy. Since its inception in April 1997, 93 men have been randomized to control (n = 47) or dietary and lifestyle intervention (n = 46). Patients in the intervention group are asked to eat a low-fat, soy-supplemented vegan diet and take part in stress management, psychosocial group support, and exercise programs. After 1 year, adherence to all four interventions was greater than 80%, and no deaths or adverse outcomes have occurred. To date, we have collected prostate-specific antigen and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy data on 63 patients (34 control and 29 intervention). This study demonstrates that a randomized, prospective dietary trial for men with localized prostate cancer is safe and feasible. The methodologies used provide insights into practical aspects of diet design and compliance assessment that may be useful templates for future dietary trials.

Diet, Vegetarian↗
PubMed2000

Diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Incomplete Infarction Trial of European Research Collaborators Evaluating Prognosis post-Thrombolysis (INTERCEPT)

BACKGROUND: Diltiazem reduces non-fatal reinfarction and refractory ischaemia after non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, an acute coronary syndrome similar to the incomplete infarction that occurs after successful reperfusion. We postulated that this agent would reduce cardiac events in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated initially with thrombolytic agents-a clinical application previously unexplored with heart-rate-lowering calcium antagonists. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, double-blind, sequential trial was done in 874 patients with acute myocardial infarction, but without congestive heart failure, who first received thrombolytic agents. Patients received either 300 mg oral diltiazem once daily, or placebo, initiated within 36-96 h of infarct onset, and given for up to 6 months. The trial primary endpoint was the cumulative first event rate of cardiac death, non-fatal reinfarction, or refractory ischaemia. Additional prespecified endpoints included several composites of non-fatal cardiac events (non-fatal reinfarction combined with refractory ischaemia, all recurrent ischaemia, or the need for myocardial revascularisation). The diagnosis of ischaemia, whether refractory or recurrent, and the need for myocardial revascularisation, was always based on objective electrocardiographical evidence of ischaemia, either at rest or on exertion. RESULTS: For the trial primary endpoint, 131 events occurred in the 444 placebo patients and 97 events in the 430 diltiazem patients (hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.02; p=0.07). For non-fatal cardiac events, diltiazem treatment was associated with a relative decrease (0.76; 0.58-1.00) in the combined event rate of non-fatal reinfarction and refractory ischaemia. There was a similar decrease in the composite non-fatal endpoints of non-fatal reinfarction combined with all recurrent ischaemia (0.80; 0.64-1.00) and non-fatal reinfarction combined with the need for myocardial revascularisation (0.67; 0.46-0.96). The need for myocardial revascularisation alone was significantly reduced by 42% (0.61; 0.39-0.96). No major safety issues were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Diltiazem did not reduce the cumulative occurrence of cardiac death, non-fatal reinfarction, or refractory ischaemia during a 6-month follow-up, but did reduce all composite endpoints of non-fatal cardiac events, especially the need for myocardial revascularisation.

Calcium Channel Blockers↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although delivery is widely used for preterm babies failing to thrive in utero, the effect of altering delivery timing has never been assessed in a randomised controlled trial. We aimed to compare the effect of delivering early with delaying birth for as long as possible. METHODS: 548 pregnant women were recruited by 69 hospitals in 13 European countries. Participants had fetal compromise between 24 and 36 weeks, an umbilical-artery doppler waveform recorded, and clinical uncertainty about whether immediate delivery was indicated. Before birth, 588 babies were randomly assigned to immediate delivery (n=296) or delayed delivery until the obstetrician was no longer uncertain (n=292). The main outcome was death or disability at or beyond 2 years of age. Disability was defined as a Griffiths developmental quotient of 70 or less or the presence of motor or perceptual severe disability. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial has been assigned the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN41358726. FINDINGS: Primary outcomes were available on 290 (98%) immediate and 283 (97%) deferred deliveries. Overall rate of death or severe disability at 2 years was 55 (19%) of 290 immediate births, and 44 (16%) of 283 delayed births. With adjustment for gestational age and umbilical-artery doppler category, the odds ratio (95% CrI) was 1.1 (0.7-1.8). Most of the observed difference was in disability in babies younger than 31 weeks of gestation at randomisation: 14 (13%) immediate versus five (5%) delayed deliveries. No important differences in the median Griffiths developmental quotient in survivors was seen. INTERPRETATION: The lack of difference in mortality suggests that obstetricians are delivering sick preterm babies at about the correct moment to minimise mortality. However, they could be delivering too early to minimise brain damage. These results do not lend support to the idea that obstetricians can deliver before terminal hypoxaemia to improve brain development.

Cerebral Palsy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The apparent shortfall in prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) noted in early hypertension trials has been attributed to disadvantages of the diuretics and beta blockers used. For a given reduction in blood pressure, some suggested that newer agents would confer advantages over diuretics and beta blockers. Our aim, therefore, was to compare the effect on non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal CHD of combinations of atenolol with a thiazide versus amlodipine with perindopril. METHODS: We did a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial in 19 257 patients with hypertension who were aged 40-79 years and had at least three other cardiovascular risk factors. Patients were assigned either amlodipine 5-10 mg adding perindopril 4-8 mg as required (amlodipine-based regimen; n=9639) or atenolol 50-100 mg adding bendroflumethiazide 1.25-2.5 mg and potassium as required (atenolol-based regimen; n=9618). Our primary endpoint was non-fatal myocardial infarction (including silent myocardial infarction) and fatal CHD. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The study was stopped prematurely after 5.5 years' median follow-up and accumulated in total 106 153 patient-years of observation. Though not significant, compared with the atenolol-based regimen, fewer individuals on the amlodipine-based regimen had a primary endpoint (429 vs 474; unadjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.02, p=0.1052), fatal and non-fatal stroke (327 vs 422; 0.77, 0.66-0.89, p=0.0003), total cardiovascular events and procedures (1362 vs 1602; 0.84, 0.78-0.90, p<0.0001), and all-cause mortality (738 vs 820; 0.89, 0.81-0.99, p=0.025). The incidence of developing diabetes was less on the amlodipine-based regimen (567 vs 799; 0.70, 0.63-0.78, p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: The amlodipine-based regimen prevented more major cardiovascular events and induced less diabetes than the atenolol-based regimen. On the basis of previous trial evidence, these effects might not be entirely explained by better control of blood pressure, and this issue is addressed in the accompanying article. Nevertheless, the results have implications with respect to optimum combinations of antihypertensive agents.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of SPf66 malaria vaccine in children in northwestern Thailand. Shoklo SPf66 Malaria Vaccine Trial Group.

BACKGROUND: Previous efficacy trials of SPf66 malaria vaccine have produced conflicting results in different populations. We report a randomised double-blind trial of the SPf66 vaccine conducted in Karen children aged 2-15 living in a malarious region of northwestern Thailand. Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine was used as a comparator. METHODS: The study had a power of 90% to detect an efficacy of 30%, defined as a reduction in the incidence of first cases of symptomatic falciparum malaria after three doses of vaccine. 1221 children received three immunisations and were eligible for the primary efficacy analysis. Intense active and passive case detection continued over 15 months of follow-up. FINDINGS: The SPf66 vaccine was well tolerated, although 26 children had mild or moderately severe local or systemic allergic reactions, compared with none in the comparator group. The vaccine was immunogenic; after three doses, 73% of recipients had seroconverted. There were no deaths due to malaria during the study. During the 15-month period of evaluation there were 379 first cases of symptomatic falciparum malaria (195 in the SPf66 recipients, 184 in the comparator group); an SPf66 efficacy of -9% (95% CI -33 to 14, p = 0.41). No significant differences between the two study groups in parasite density or any other measure of malaria-related morbidity were detected. INTERPRETATION: These findings are consistent with a recent study showing lack of efficacy of SPf66 among Gambian infants and differ from earlier positive reports from South America and evidence of borderline efficacy from Tanzania. We conclude that SPf66 does not protect against clinical falciparum malaria and that further efficacy trials are not warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Systemic Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations (SCCOPE): rationale and design of an equivalence trial. Veterans Administration Cooperative Trials SCCOPE Study Group.

The Systemic Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations Trial (SCCOPE) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial sponsored by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program. Its principal purpose was to determine whether withholding systemic corticosteroids in patients hospitalized for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who were treated with other usual therapy resulted in a clinically significant increase in the rate of treatment failure. Because placebo was compared to a standard therapy, the study was designed as an equivalence trial. If corticosteroids proved effective, the study would also determine whether a short course was as effective as a long one. SCCOPE was to enroll up to 1100 subjects from more than 20 Veterans Administration Medical Centers over 3 years. Patients were screened shortly after hospital admission for acute exacerbation of COPD. Principal criteria for eligibility were age of 50 years or older, smoking history of 30 pack-years or more, clinical diagnosis of COPD as opposed to asthma, nonuse of systemic corticosteroids in the previous 30 days, and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of 1500 ml or less. Eligible subjects were randomized to one of three treatment arms: (1) short course (2 weeks) of systemic corticosteroids, (2) long course (8 weeks) of systemic corticosteroids, or (3) placebo. We standardized most other aspects of care. We followed patients for 6 months. The primary endpoint of the study was treatment failure, defined as death, intubation with mechanical ventilation, hospital readmission for COPD, or intensification of pharmacologic therapy. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, changes in FEV1, and changes in dyspnea score. We also evaluated possible adverse effects from systemic corticosteroids.

Double-Blind Method↗
PubMed1998

Design and baseline characteristics of the Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies In-Hospital (VANQWISH) trial. VANQWISH Trial Research Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: The Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies In-Hospital (VANQWISH) trial was designed to compare outcomes of patients with a non-Q wave myocardial infarction (NQMI) who were randomized prospectively to an early "invasive" strategy versus an early "conservative" strategy. The primary objective was to compare early and late outcomes between the two strategies using a combined trial end point (all-cause mortality or nonfatal infarction) during at least 1 year of follow-up. BACKGROUND: Because of the widely held view that survivors of NQMI are at high risk for subsequent cardiac events, management of these patients has become more aggressive during the last decade. There is a paucity of data from controlled trials to support such an approach, however. METHODS: Appropriate patients with a new NQMI were randomized to an early "invasive" strategy (routine coronary angiography followed by myocardial revascularization, if feasible) versus an early "conservative" strategy (noninvasive, predischarge stress testing with planar thallium scintigraphy and radionuclide ventriculography), where the use of coronary angiography and myocardial revascularization was guided by the development of ischemia (clinical course or results of noninvasive tests, or both). RESULTS: A total of 920 patients were randomized (mean follow-up 23 months, range 12 to 44). The mean patient age was 61 +/- 10 years; 97% were male; 38% had ST segment depression at study entry; 30% had an anterior NQMI; 54% were hypertensive; 26% had diabetes requiring insulin; 43% were current smokers; 43% had a previous acute myocardial infarction; and 45% had antecedent angina within 3 weeks of the index NQMI. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline characteristics were compatible with a moderate to high risk group of patients with an NQMI.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy and safety of a once-daily morphine formulation in chronic, moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis pain: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial and an open-label extension trial.

A randomized, 4-week, double-blind trial followed by an open-label extension trial assessed the efficacy and safety of a once-daily, extended-release morphine formulation (Avinza (previously referred to as Morphelan)) in 295 patients with chronic, moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis pain who had failed to obtain adequate pain relief with NSAIDs and acetaminophen. Participants received one of four treatments: Avinza 30 mg once daily (QAM or QPM), MS Contin(R) 15 mg twice daily, or placebo twice daily. Patients (n =181) received Avinza QAM or QPM during the 26-week open-label extension trial and could increase their dose to optimize pain control. Avinza and MS Contin reduced pain and improved several sleep measures versus placebo. Analgesic efficacy was comparable between Avinza and MS Contin; however, Avinza QAM demonstrated greater improvements in overall quality of sleep. The most common adverse events were constipation and nausea. The majority of AEs occurred at a similar incidence among the active treatment groups.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Racial differences in response to therapy for heart failure: analysis of the vasodilator-heart failure trials. Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure in blacks has been associated with a poorer prognosis than in whites. In such diseases as hypertension, blacks show pathophysiological differences and respond differently to some therapies than whites. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics and response to therapy of black compared with white patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the first Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial (V-HeFT I), 180 black male patients were compared with 450 white male patients for baseline characteristics, prognosis, and response to therapy. In V-HeFT II, the same comparisons were made for 215 black and 574 white male patients, including an analysis stratified by the presence or absence of a history of hypertension. In both trials, black patients had a lower incidence of coronary artery disease, greater incidence of previous hypertension, and a greater cardiothoracic ratio (P < .05) than white patients. In V-HeFT II, plasma norepinephrine levels were significantly less in blacks; plasma renin activity was less only in blacks with a history of hypertension. Overall mortality or hospitalization for congestive heart failure did not differ between blacks and whites in the placebo group in V-HeFT I. However, the mortality of black patients receiving hydralazine plus isosorbide dinitrate (H-I) was reduced (P = .04) in V-HeFT I, whereas white patients showed no difference from placebo. In V-HeFT II, only white patients showed a mortality reduction from enalapril therapy compared with H-I therapy (P = .02). Whites also showed evidence of greater blood pressure reduction and enhanced regression of cardiac size in response to enalapril. When stratified by history of hypertension in V-HeFT II, only whites with a history of hypertension, who had greater renin levels, showed significant mortality reduction with enalapril compared with H-I therapy. Hospitalization rates did not differ between treatment groups in either study. CONCLUSION: Whites and blacks showed differences in cause, neurohormonal stimulation, and pharmacological response in heart failure. This retrospective analysis suggests angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are particularly effective in whites, and the H-I combination can be equally effective in blacks. Prospective trials involving large numbers of black patients are needed to further clarify their response to therapy.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intracoronary radiation for patients with refractory in-stent restenosis: an analysis from the WRIST-Crossover Trial. Washington Radiation for In-stent Restenosis Trial.

BACKGROUND: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a limitation of intracoronary stent implantation. In animal models and clinical trials, ionizing radiation has been shown to decrease in-stent neointimal formation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the Washington Radiation for In-stent Restenosis Trial (WRIST), patients with in-stent restenosis were first treated with conventional catheter-based techniques and then randomized to gamma irradiation (l92Ir, 15 Gy at 2 mm from the source) or placebo. Patients randomized to placebo that developed recurrent ISR and presented with anginal symptoms were crossed-over to active therapy. We compared the clinical and angiographic outcomes of 39 patients in the crossover group with 65 patients treated primarily with radiation. The primary clinical endpoints were mortality, morbidity, and repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months. RESULTS: Procedural success was 100%. In-hospital and 30-day complications were minimal. At 6 months, the rate for any multiple adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, MI, or TLR) was 25.6% in the crossover group vs. 29.2% in the primary treatment group (p = 0.86). Three patients in the crossover group and four in the primary treatment group died (p = NS). There were no Q-wave myocardial infarction. Ten (9.6%) of the patients presented with late thrombosis and total occlusion: 6.2% (4/65) in the primary treatment group vs. 15.4% (6/39) in the crossover group (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who fail conventional catheter-based intervention without radiation can be treated with 192Ir with results similar to those who initially receive brachytherapy. This is of specific importance with respect to patients initially assigned to the placebo arm of randomized clinical trials.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed1996

A randomised trial of low-dose/high-frequency chemotherapy as palliative treatment of poor-prognosis small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer research Campaign trial.

We report the results of a randomised trial in extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) of a novel approach to palliative chemotherapy. A widely used 3 weekly regimen was compared with the same drugs given at half the dose but twice the frequency with the same intended overall dose intensity (DI). A total of 167 patients defined as having extensive SCLC with adverse prognostic features were randomised to receive either a 3 weekly regimen of cisplatin 60 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and 100 mg b.d. orally on days 2 and 3 alternating with cyclophosphamide 600 mg m-2 i.v., doxorubicin 50 mg m-2 i.v. and vincristine 2 mg i.v. all on day 1 for a maximum of six courses (3 weekly); or treatment with the same drugs but with each course consisting of half the 3 weekly dose given every 10 or 11 days for a maximum of 12 courses. In the 10/11 day regimen overall response rate was 58.9% (95% CI, 47.9-69.2%) with 12.8% complete responses (CR). For the 3 weekly treatment the overall response rate was 44.9% (95% CI, 35.0-55.5%) with 10.1% CR. Median survival was similar in the two arms at 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.9-7.3 months) and 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.0-6.6 months) respectively. Survival at 1 year was 9.9% (95% CI, 5.0-18.5%) and 8.9% (95% CI, 4.6-16.6%). The 95% CI for the difference in survival at 1 year is -7.09% to +9.09%. Haematological toxicity and treatment delays owing to infection were more frequent with the 10/11 day regimen but other toxicities were equal in both arms. Other aspects of quality of life were measured in a small representative cohort of patients using a daily diary card (DDC). There was a trend of improved quality of life on the 10/11 day arm, but there was little difference between the two treatments. The trial shows that a low-dose/high-frequency regimen with the same DI as conventionally scheduled chemotherapy gives similar response rates and survival. This and other modifications of the schedule may offer new approaches to palliative treatment of advanced cancer. However, in this trial there was no significant benefit in toxicity or other aspects of quality of life.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Surgery for persistent otitis media with effusion: generalizability of results from the UK trial (TARGET). Trial of Alternative Regimens in Glue Ear Treatment.

TARGET (Trial of Alternative Regimens in Glue Ear Treatment) is a multicentre UK randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing bilateral ventilation tubes with and without adjuvant adenoidectomy against non-surgical management in children with bilateral, persistent otitis media with effusion (OME). This paper compares the recruited and randomized children with those that, although eligible, were not included in the RCT for various reasons. This is necessary to identify any potential bias in the overall estimate of treatment effectiveness. At the first visit, 1315 children with OME satisfied the criteria of age (3 years 3 months-6 years 9 months), no previous ear or adenoid surgery, tympanometric evidence of fluid (bilateral B or B + C2) and a hearing loss (conductive loss in both ears of > or =20 dBHL). Of these children, 151 (11%) were not followed up because of overriding concern and 70 (5%) because of parental refusal. Of the 506 children eligible for randomization, because of persistence over 12 weeks of watchful waiting of bilateral OME with the same criteria, 20 (4%) were not randomized because of overriding concern and 75 (15%) because of parental refusal. The distribution of the potential effect modifiers was determined for each group. At the first visit, the only significant differences (P < 0.05), comparing those not recruited because of overriding concern with those recruited, were in respect of sex (61% girls compared with 52% boys) and hearing level (34.6 compared with 33.0 dBHL). At the second visit, the only significant difference involved less frequent upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in children whose parents refused to allow randomization (8% compared with 18% had had episodic URTI more often than once every 3 months). It is probable that the findings from the TARGET trial will translate to the entire clinic population in this age group as long as they meet the same audiometric and tympanometric criteria. The differences found can be handled by presentation of disaggregated results.

Adenoidectomy↗
PubMed2000

Heparin infusion prior to stenting (HIPS) trial: final results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the effects of local vascular delivery on intimal hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Local delivery of pharmacologic agents or genes at the site of angioplasty is a promising approach to reduce restenosis. However, there are unresolved questions concerning the safety and feasibility of local vascular delivery in clinical practice as well as the efficacy of delivered drug. To this end, the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of local delivery of heparin were evaluated in the Heparin Infusion Prior to Stenting (HIPS) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, prospective, core laboratory-evaluated trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 5000 U heparin either administered to the coronary artery lumen or infused into the arterial wall immediately after angioplasty and before stent placement. End points included procedural events and clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound events at 6 months. Patient groups were evenly matched. There was no difference in the incidence of arterial injury, defined as an increase in arterial dissection, acute closure, or decrease in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade blood flow in the group receiving local delivery. At follow-up there was no difference in the major adverse event rate between intraluminal (22.7%) and local groups (24.7%). There was no difference between intraluminal and local therapy in the angiographic in-stent restenosis rate (12.5%, 12.7%) or the in-stent volumetric analysis by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (37.19 +/- 20. 86 mm(3) vs 43.79 +/- 25.52 mm(3)). CONCLUSIONS: Local delivery of 5000 U heparin into the arterial wall before stent implantation is safe and feasible. There was not a favorable effect of locally delivered heparin on clinical, angiographic, or IVUS end points of restenosis. The use of IVUS to measure volume of intimal hyperplasia in a multicenter, core laboratory-controlled trial is feasible.

Blood Flow Velocity↗
PubMed2002

An N-of-1 randomized controlled trial ('N-of-1 trial') of donepezil in the treatment of non-progressive amnestic syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: a professional man sustained a residual, persisting, isolated impairment of short-term memory secondary to severe carbon monoxide poisoning. Informal, open trial of the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil resulted in uncertain benefit. PROTOCOL: an N-of-1 randomized, double-blind controlled trial of donepezil against placebo. Placebo-induced headache permitted evaluation of donepezil at only the 5 mg dose. RESULTS: there was no improvement in short-term memory. CONCLUSION: the trial excluded significant benefit of donepezil 5 mg in this patient, preventing long-term unnecessary prescription. Beneficial effects in other similar patients or at higher dosage cannot be excluded.

Cholinesterase Inhibitors↗
PubMed2005

Use of a Bayesian approach to decide when to stop a therapeutic trial: the case of a chemoprophylaxis trial in human immunodeficiency virus infection.

From 1996 to 1998, a phase III, placebo-controlled, therapeutic trial was conducted in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, to assess the efficacy of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in reducing severe morbidity in adults at early stages of human immunodeficiency virus infection. The authors used the real data from this trial to simulate three Bayesian interim analyses. Three prior distributions were considered: a noninformative one, a skeptical one, and one based on external information. The posterior distribution was calculated by using directed acyclic graphs and Gibbs sampling. This Bayesian approach showed different results according to the prior distribution chosen. Although use of the noninformative prior would have led to stopping the trial at the same time that the frequentist approach would have, the skeptical prior would have led to continuing it, and the prior based on external data would have led to stopping it 1 year earlier.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed2005

A randomised trial in malignant mesothelioma (M) of early (E) versus delayed (D) chemotherapy in symptomatically stable patients: the MED trial.

BACKGROUND: Prior phase II trials have demonstrated the therapeutic activity of cytotoxic chemotherapy in mesothelioma. Currently there are few randomised data assessing the role of chemotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC) in the management of patients with stable symptoms after control of any pleural effusion. A policy of observation is often adopted over initial use of chemotherapy. In this prospective randomised trial we assess the use of early versus delayed cytotoxic therapy. The study opened in 1998, and closed in view of a competing national study (MSO 1) in 2003. METHODS: Eligible patients had a performance status 3 months and had stable symptoms for at least 4 weeks prior to randomisation. Patients were randomised to receive immediate chemotherapy or initial BSC with the addition of chemotherapy at time of symptomatic progression. All patients received the same platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, MVP [mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, maximum 10 mg, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (or carboplatin AUC 5)], every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were recruited, of which 21 were randomised to the early treatment group and 22 to the delayed treatment group. The median ages were 59 years (range 50-78) and 67 years (range 48-75), respectively (P=0.1); other baseline parameters were well matched between the two groups. All 21 patients in the early group received chemotherapy versus 17 patients in the delayed group. Median time to symptomatic progression was 25 weeks in the early group compared with 11 weeks for the delayed group (P=0.1). Median survival was 14 months (1-year survival 66%) for the early group compared with 10 months (1-year survival 36%) for the delayed group (P=0.1). Quality of life was in general better maintained for early treatment and the health resources use was similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this patient group, presenting with stable symptoms after control of pleural effusion, the early use of chemotherapy provided an extended period of symptom control, and in this small trial a trend to survival advantage.

Aged↗