Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Simvastatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Effects of simvastatin on walking performance and symptoms of intermittent claudication in hypercholesterolemic patients with peripheral vascular disease.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effects of short-term therapy with simvastatin on walking performance in hypercholesterolemic patients with peripheral vascular disease. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with peripheral arterial disease (Fontaine stage II), intermittent claudication, and total cholesterol levels >220 mg/dL were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Forty-three patients were assigned to simvastatin (40 mg/d); the remaining 43 patients were assigned to placebo treatment. All patients underwent an exercise test and clinical examination, and completed a self-assessment questionnaire at 0, 3, and 6 months. Pain-free and total walking distance, resting and postexercise ankle-brachial indexes, and questionnaire scores were determined at each follow-up. RESULTS: At 6 months, the mean pain-free walking distance had increased 90 meters (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64 to 116 meters; P <0.005) more in the simvastatin group than in the placebo group. Similar results were seen for the total walking distance (mean between-group difference in the change, 126 meters; 95% CI: 101 to 151 meters; P <0.001), and for the ankle-brachial index at rest (mean, 0.09; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.12; P <0.01) and after exercise (mean, 0.19; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.24; P <0.005). There was also a greater improvement in claudication symptoms among patients treated with simvastatin. The effects on walking performance, ankle-brachial indexes, and questionnaire scores had also been significant at 3 months. CONCLUSION: High-dose short-term therapy with simvastatin may improve walking performance, ankle-brachial pressure indexes, and symptoms of claudication in hypercholesterolemic patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Simvastatin improves arterial compliance in the lower limb but not in the aorta.

UNLABELLED: Several cardiovascular risk factors adversely affect arterial compliance or the distensibility of large arteries. The role of raised low-density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol is uncertain, most studies having shown little effect. We, therefore, investigated whether lowering LDL would improve arterial compliance. Twenty hypercholesterolemic subjects (LDL cholesterol 4.95+/-1.11 mmol/l) were randomized to simvastatin (20 or 40 mg daily) or placebo, each for 4 weeks. Arterial function was assessed at the end of the placebo and simvastatin periods, systemic arterial compliance (SAC) and pulse wave velocities (PWV) centrally (aorto-femoral) and peripherally (femoral-posterior tibial). RESULTS: Lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol was reduced similarly with 20 and 40 mg simvastatin (ten subjects each dose) and data were pooled. Lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol fell 39%, plasma triglyceride fell 18% and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol rose 12%, all significant. Systemic arterial compliance (SAC) and central PWV did not change significantly but peripheral PWV showed evidence of greater compliance after simvastatin (10.1+/-1.3 vs. 9.4+/-1.3 m/s with placebo and simvastatin, P<0.03), distensibility being inversely related to PWV. Improvement in PWV was greatest in those with poorest baseline values, r=0.50; P<0.02. CONCLUSION: Peripheral PWV was alone improved with LDL lowering probably because of the muscularity of that arterial bed; central PWV and SAC (in the elastic aorta) were not influenced.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Anti-atherosclerotic effect of simvastatin depends on the presence of apolipoprotein E.

Low density lipoprotein receptor deficient (LDLR-KO) and apolipoprotein E deficient (apo E-KO) mice both develop hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis by different mechanisms. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of simvastatin on cholesterol levels, endothelial dysfunction, and aortic lesions in these two models of experimental atherosclerosis. Male LDLR-KO mice fed a high cholesterol (HC; 1%) diet developed atherosclerosis at 8 months of age with hypercholesterolemia. The addition of simvastatin (300 mg/kg daily) to the HC diet for 2 more months lowered total cholesterol levels by approximately 57% and reduced aortic plaque area by approximately 15% compared with the LDLR-KO mice continued on HC diet alone, P<0.05. Simvastatin treatment also improved acetylcholine (ACh)-induced endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in isolated aortic rings, which was associated with an increase in NOS-3 expression by approximately 88% in the aorta measured by real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), P<0.05. In contrast, in age-matched male apo E-KO mice fed a normal diet, the same treatment of simvastatin elevated serum total cholesterol by approximately 35%, increased aortic plaque area by approximately 15%, and had no effect on endothelial function. These results suggest that the therapeutic effects of simvastatin may depend on the presence of a functional apolipoprotein E.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed1997

Expanded-dose simvastatin is effective in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HFH) have abnormalities in both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor alleles, resulting in severe hypercholesterolaemia and premature coronary heart disease. Limited treatment options are available and the response to drug therapy has been poor. In the present paper, we have evaluated the efficacy and safety of simvastatin at doses beyond the current maximal dose of 40 mg/day in patients with HFH. After a 4 week placebo diet run-in period, 12 patients with well-characterized HFH were randomized to simvastatin 80 mg/day administered in three divided doses (n = 8; group 1) or 40 mg once daily (n = 4; group 2). After 9 weeks, the dose in group 1 was increased to 160 mg/day while the dose in group 2 was kept at 40 mg/day, but with the drug given in three divided doses and treatment continued for an additional 9 weeks. All 12 patients completed the study and there were no serious or unexpected adverse effects. LDL-cholesterol concentrations fell by 14% at the 40 mg/day dose, but were reduced further at the higher doses (25% at the 80 mg/day and by 31% at the 160 mg/day dosage, P < 0.0001). Excretion of urinary mevalonic acid, as an index of in vivo cholesterol biosynthesis, was reduced but did not correlate with reduction in LDL-cholesterol in the individual patients. The magnitude of response to therapy was not predicted by the LDL-receptor gene defect as patients with the same LDL-receptor mutations responded differently to the same dose of simvastatin therapy. The ability of expanded doses of simvastatin (80 or 160 mg/day) to reduce LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with HFH, even if receptor negative, suggests that at these doses, the drug reduces LDL production. Simvastatin therapy, at doses of 80 or 160 mg/day, should therefore be considered in all patients with HFH, either as an adjunct to apheresis, or as monotherapy for those patients who do not have access to apheresis or other such treatment modalities.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Similar response to simvastatin in patients heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia with mRNA negative and mRNA positive mutations.

In patients heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia, the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering effect of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors may depend on the nature of the mutation in the LDL receptor gene. To test this hypothesis, we compared the response to simvastatin, 20 mg daily for 9 weeks, between heterozygous carriers of functionally different classes of mutations, i.e. mRNA negative or mRNA positive mutations. Out of 116 consecutive, unrelated patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, 27 patients were selected for molecular analyses: 14 patients with mRNA negative and 13 with mRNA positive mutations. Before simvastatin treatment, patients with mRNA negative mutations had higher levels of LDL cholesterol, lower levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and significantly more often tendon xanthomas, compared to patients with mRNA positive mutations. Simvastatin reduced the mean fasting LDL cholesterol levels to a similar percentage in the mRNA negative and mRNA positive patients (37, 36%, respectively, 95% CI of difference--8 to 5%, P = 0.2). This effect was similar to the 37% decrease observed in our total series of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 116). The increase in mean concentration of HDL cholesterol was greater in the mRNA negative group than in the mRNA positive group (16, 0%, respectively, 95%, CI of difference 8-25%, P = 0.002) independent of the response of total triglycerides to simvastatin. The percentage LDL cholesterol lowering response varied among multiple carriers of the same mutation, even in the case of mRNA negative mutations. We conclude that the percentage LDL lowering response to simvastatin treatment was similar in patients with mRNA negative and mRNA positive mutations. Moreover, variation of this response within multiple carriers of the same mutation suggests an influence of additional factors.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on gonadal function in male hypercholesterolemic patients.

Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis by hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors could, in theory, adversely affect male gonadal function because cholesterol is a precursor of steroid hormones. The objective of this randomized double-blind trial was to compare the effects of simvastatin, pravastatin, and placebo on gonadal testosterone production and spermatogenesis. After a 6-week placebo and lipid-lowering diet run-in period, 159 male patients aged 21 to 55 years with type IIa or IIb hypercholesterolemia, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol between 145 and 240 mg/dL, and normal basal levels of testosterone were randomly assigned to treatment with simvastatin 20 mg (n = 40), simvastatin 40 mg (n = 41), pravastatin 40 mg (n = 39), or placebo (n = 39) once daily. After 24 weeks of treatment, mean total cholesterol levels were decreased 24% to 27% and mean LDL cholesterol was decreased 30% to 34% in the 3 active-treatment groups (P < .001 for all comparisons to placebo). At 24 weeks, there were no statistically significant differences between the placebo group and any of the active-treatment groups for the change from baseline in testosterone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)stimulated testosterone, free testosterone index, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), or sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences at week 12 or week 24 for the change from baseline in sperm concentration, ejaculate volume, or sperm motility for any active treatment relative to placebo. Both simvastatin and pravastatin were well tolerated. In summary, we found no evidence for clinically meaningful effects of simvastatin or pravastatin on gonadal testosterone production, testosterone reserve, or multiple parameters of semen quality.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Effect of estrogen and simvastatin on low-density lipoprotein subclasses in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the effects of estrogen and simvastatin, individually and in combination, on the levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subclasses in postmenopausal women with type IIa hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Fifty-five postmenopausal women with type IIa hypercholesterolemia were assigned randomly to 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen (n = 20), 5 mg of simvastatin (n = 18), or both (n = 17) daily for 3 months. Cholesterol, triglyceride, and apolipoprotein B levels in the plasma and in the LDL1 (density 1.019-1.045 g/mL) and LDL2 (density 1.045-1.063 g/mL) fractions were measured before and after treatment. RESULTS: Estrogen treatment significantly reduced LDL1 cholesterol and LDL1 apolipoprotein B levels by 18.4% and 20.8%, respectively; simvastatin treatment by 21.9% and 29.2%, respectively; and combination therapy by 38.5% and 34.4%, respectively. In contrast to estrogen or simvastatin treatment, the combination therapy also significantly lowered the levels of LDL2 cholesterol by 19.5% and LDL2 apolipoprotein B by 30.5%. Posttreatment levels of total cholesterol, LDL1 cholesterol, and LDL1 apolipoprotein B were significantly lower after combination treatment than after estrogen treatment. Estrogen treatment, but not combination therapy, significantly increased total plasma triglyceride levels (103.1+/-26.0 mg/dL to 138.8+/-75.6 mg/dL, P < .01). Significantly more patients receiving combination therapy than those receiving estrogen had total and LDL cholesterol concentrations reduced to target levels. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with estrogen and simvastatin favorably affected lipid metabolism by reducing large and small LDL particles and prevented the estrogen-induced increase in plasma triglyceride levels.

Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)↗
PubMed2003

MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with diabetes are at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, although typically their plasma concentrations of LDL cholesterol are similar to those in the general population. Previous evidence about the effects of lowering cholesterol in people with diabetes has been limited, and most diabetic patients do not currently receive cholesterol-lowering therapy despite their increased risk. METHODS: 5963 UK adults (aged 40-80 years) known to have diabetes, and an additional 14573 with occlusive arterial disease (but no diagnosed diabetes), were randomly allocated to receive 40 mg simvastatin daily or matching placebo. Prespecified analyses in these prior disease subcategories, and other relevant subcategories, were of first major coronary event (ie, non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death) and of first major vascular event (ie, major coronary event, stroke or revascularisation). Analyses were also conducted of subsequent vascular events during the scheduled treatment period. Comparisons are of all simvastatin-allocated versus all placebo-allocated participants (ie, intention to treat), which yielded an average difference in LDL cholesterol of 1.0 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) during the 5-year treatment period. FINDINGS: Both among the participants who presented with diabetes and among those who did not, there were highly significant reductions of about a quarter in the first event rate for major coronary events, for strokes, and for revascularisations. For the first occurrence of any of these major vascular events among participants with diabetes, there was a definite 22% (95% CI 13-30) reduction in the event rate (601 [20.2%] simvastatin-allocated vs 748 [25.1%] placebo-allocated, p<0.0001), which was similar to that among the other high-risk individuals studied. There were also highly significant reductions of 33% (95% CI 17-46, p=0.0003) among the 2912 diabetic participants who did not have any diagnosed occlusive arterial disease at entry, and of 27% (95% CI 13-40, p=0.0007) among the 2426 diabetic participants whose pretreatment LDL cholesterol concentration was below 3.0 mmol/L (116 mg/dL). The proportional reduction in risk was also about a quarter among various other subcategories of diabetic patient studied, including: those with different duration, type, or control of diabetes; those aged over 65 years at entry or with hypertension; and those with total cholesterol below 5.0 mmol/L (193 mg/dL). In addition, among participants who had a first major vascular event following randomisation, allocation to simvastatin reduced the rate of subsequent events during the scheduled treatment period. INTERPRETATION: The present study provides direct evidence that cholesterol-lowering therapy is beneficial for people with diabetes even if they do not already have manifest coronary disease or high cholesterol concentrations. Allocation to 40 mg simvastatin daily reduced the rate of first major vascular events by about a quarter in a wide range of diabetic patients studied. After making allowance for non-compliance, actual use of this statin regimen would probably reduce these rates by about a third. For example, among the type of diabetic patient studied without occlusive arterial disease, 5 years of treatment would be expected to prevent about 45 people per 1000 from having at least one major vascular event (and, among these 45 people, to prevent about 70 first or subsequent events during this treatment period). Statin therapy should now be considered routinely for all diabetic patients at sufficiently high risk of major vascular events, irrespective of their initial cholesterol concentrations.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Effects of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin on stroke and other major vascular events in 20536 people with cerebrovascular disease or other high-risk conditions.

BACKGROUND: Lower blood cholesterol concentrations have consistently been found to be strongly associated with lower risks of coronary disease but not with lower risks of stroke. Despite this observation, previous randomised trials had indicated that cholesterol-lowering statin therapy reduces the risk of stroke, but large-scale prospective confirmation has been needed. METHODS: 3280 adults with cerebrovascular disease, and an additional 17256 with other occlusive arterial disease or diabetes, were randomly allocated 40 mg simvastatin daily or matching placebo. Subgroup analyses were prespecified of first "major vascular event" (ie, non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death, stroke of any type, or any revascularisation procedure) in prior disease subcategories. Subsidiary outcomes included any stroke, and stroke sub-type. Comparisons are of all simvastatin-allocated versus all placebo-allocated participants (ie, "intention-to-treat"), which yielded an average difference in LDL cholesterol of 1.0 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) during the 5-year treatment period. FINDINGS: Overall, there was a highly significant 25% (95% CI 15-34) proportional reduction in the first event rate for stroke (444 [4.3%] simvastatin vs 585 [5.7%] placebo; p<0.0001), reflecting a definite 28% (19-37) reduction in presumed ischaemic strokes (p<0.0001) and no apparent difference in strokes attributed to haemorrhage (51 [0.5%] vs 53 [0.5%]; rate ratio 0.95 [0.65-1.40]; p=0.8). In addition, simvastatin reduced the numbers having transient cerebral ischaemic attacks alone (2.0% vs 2.4%; p=0.02) or requiring carotid endarterectomy or angioplasty (0.4% vs 0.8%; p=0.0003). The reduction in stroke was not significant during the first year, but was already significant (p=0.0004) by the end of the second year. Among patients with pre-existing cerebrovascular disease there was no apparent reduction in the stroke rate, but there was a highly significant 20% (8-29) reduction in the rate of any major vascular event (406 [24.7%] vs 488 [29.8%]; p=0.001). The proportional reductions in stroke were about one-quarter in each of the other subcategories of participant studied, including: those with coronary disease or diabetes; those aged under or over 70 years at entry; and those presenting with different levels of blood pressure or lipids (even when the pretreatment LDL cholesterol was below 3.0 mmol/L [116 mg/dL]). INTERPRETATION: Much larger numbers of people in the present study suffered a stroke than in any previous cholesterol-lowering trial. The results demonstrate that statin therapy rapidly reduces the incidence not only of coronary events but also of ischaemic strokes, with no apparent effect on cerebral haemorrhage, even among individuals who do not have high cholesterol concentrations. Allocation to 40 mg simvastatin daily reduced the rate of ischaemic strokes by about one-quarter and so, after making allowance for non-compliance in the trial, actual use of this regimen would probably reduce the stroke rate by about a third. HPS also provides definitive evidence that statin therapy is beneficial for people with pre-existing cerebrovascular disease, even if they do not already have manifest coronary disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The influence of treatment of hypercholesterolemic patients with simvastatin on plasma chemotactic activity and adherence of neutrophils.

BACKGROUND: there is some evidence to indicate that statins may affect the function of immune and inflammatory cells. This study investigates the influence of short term treatment with simvastatin on plasma chemotactic activity and adherence of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in hypercholesterolemic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: 20 hypercholesterolemic patients (250-400 mg/dl) were given simvastatin (20 mg daily for 12 weeks). Peripheral blood samples were taken before and after 4 and 12 weeks of the therapy. The percentage of neutrophils adhering to plastic surface coated with albumin was significantly higher when cells were incubated with plasma obtained after 12 weeks of treatment with simvastatin in comparison with plasma collected before the therapy (unstimulated neutrophils: 5.945+/-0.475% vs. 8.155+/-0.96%, P=0.0477, stimulated neutrophils: 39.09+/-4.540% vs. 29.18+/-3.702%, P=0.032). There was a significant negative correlation between adherence of stimulated neutrophils and total cholesterol levels ((r)=-0.2796, 95% CI -0. 4999 to -0.02526, r(2)=0.07817, P=0.032). Migration of neutrophils towards plasma obtained after 12 weeks of treatment with simvastatin was significantly higher than towards plasma collected before the therapy (7.038+/-1.127 vs. 4.505+/-0 618 P=0.0475). CONCLUSION: treatment of hypercholesterolemic patients with simvastatin increases the chemotactic activity of plasma and augments the adherence of human neutrophils.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy and safety of a new cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, atorvastatin, in comparison with simvastatin and pravastatin, in subjects with hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: High levels of total and LDL-cholesterol are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Lowering of serum cholesterol levels by pharmacologic intervention with inhibitors of cholesterol synthesis, the so-called statins, reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events in subjects with and without atherosclerotic manifestations. In a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label cross-over study we compared the efficacy and safety of the new compound atorvastatin for reducing LDL-cholesterol with simvastatin or pravastatin. METHODS: Following a 4-week placebo-controlled baseline period patients with LDL-cholesterol between 4.1 and 6.2 mmol/l and serum triglycerides below 3.4 mmol/l were randomly assigned to treatment either with 5 or 20 mg atorvastatin, or with 10 mg simvastatin or 20 mg pravastatin once daily for 4 weeks. After a placebo-washout period of 4-6 weeks, patients switched to the alternate treatment. At the end of weeks 3 and 4 of each study phase the serum concentrations of lipid parameters and apolipoproteins as well as safety parameters were determined. RESULTS: A total of 78 subjects entered the study. Treatment with 5 mg atorvastatin reduced total and LDL-cholesterol by 21 and 27%, respectively, which was similar to 10 mg simvastatin (total cholesterol -20%, LDL-cholesterol -28%) and 20 mg pravastatin (-18 and -24%, respectively). The effects of this low dose of atorvastatin on triglyceride levels (-16%) was not different from that of simvastatin and pravastatin (-8 and -11%, respectively). Treatment with 20 mg atorvastatin caused significantly larger reductions in total cholesterol (-33%) and LDL-cholesterol (-44%), serum triglycerides (-23%), and apo B (-40%) compared to simvastatin and pravastatin. Atorvastatin was well-tolerated, and no serious or medically important adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that atorvastatin is a safe and very efficacious cholesterol-lowering agent, which also possesses significant triglyceride-lowering properties.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Simvastatin inhibits the division and induces neurite-like outgrowth in PC12 cells.

Simvastatin, a potent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor. inhibited cell division in a dose dependent fashion and induced neurite-like outgrowth in PC12 cells. The neurite-like outgrowth was detectable at 0.5 microg/ml of simvastatin 24 h after the treatment. The responses to simvastatin were completely prevented by incubating the cells with mevalonate. In contrast to simvastatin, pravastatin, a similar HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor but lipophobic, had no effect on the cells. The results provide new possibilities for the central nervous system (CNS) side effects of simvastatin therapy.

Acyl Coenzyme A↗
PubMed1998

NO is not involved in the simvastatin induced cell division and differentiation in PC12 cells.

Simvastatin, a potent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor has been reported to inhibit cell division and induce neurite-like outgrowth in PC12 cells [Sato-Suzuki, I. and Murota, S., Neurosci. Lett., 220 (1996) 21-24]. In the present paper, we examined whether the induced nitric oxide (NO) in the simvastatin-treated PC12 cells is involved in the growth arrest and differentiation as reported in nerve growth factor (NGF) treated PC12 cells. Treatment of PC12 cells with simvastatin caused peripherin formation and enhanced NO production just like NGF-treated PC12 cells. Different from NGF, however, NO synthase inhibitors could not affect the growth arrest and differentiation in simvastatin-treated PC12 cells. In conclusion, NO had nothing to do with cell division and differentiation in simvastatin-treated PC12 cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Effects of bezafibrate and simvastatin on plasma lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia resistant to hormone replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Estrogen replacement therapy has favorable effects on serum lipoprotein levels in postmenopausal women with hypercholesterolemia. However, there are some patients who fail to respond to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to lower the serum cholesterol level. In these cases, a conventional lipid-lowering therapy will be applied in addition to HRT, while the effects of these drugs are not well understood. In this study, we studied the effects of simvastatin and bezafibrate administered in addition to HRT. METHODS: Patients who were hypercholesterolemic even after HRT were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: HRT only (control group, n=10), HRT+simvastatin (10 mg/day, n=10), or HRT+bezafibrate (400 mg/day, n=10). Serum lipids and lipoprotein levels were measured throughout 12 weeks. RESULTS: The serum triglyceride levels were decreased by 24+/-28 and 38+/-13% in the HRT+simvastatin and HRT+bezafibrate groups, respectively. HRT+simvastatin decreased the total cholesterol (21+/-10%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (28+/-12%) levels without affecting the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level, while HRT+bezafibrate increased the HDL-C level (12+/-11%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with simvastatin or bezafibrate in addition to HRT should be considered in cases of postmenopausal hypercholesterolemia in which HRT alone fails to lower the serum lipoprotein levels.

Bezafibrate↗
PubMed2001

Simvastatin treatment is associated with improvement in coronary endothelial function and decreased cytokine activation in patients after heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the association between 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibition, coronary endothelial function and cytokine activation in heart transplant recipients without angiographically detectable disease. BACKGROUND: Coronary endothelial dysfunction contributes to cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The vasoprotective effects of statins in heart transplant recipients may include restoration of endothelial function and suppression of allograft inflammatory activity. METHODS: Heart transplant recipients (one to three years after heart transplant) were divided into three groups based on the total cholesterol levels: group 1 (n = 21), patients with a history of hypercholesterolemia adequately controlled with simvastatin; group 2 (n = 19), patients with hypercholesterolemia not adequately treated with simvastatin; and group 3 (n = 40), patients without hypercholesterolemia. Coronary vasomotor function and intimal thickness as well as coronary sinus and aortic cytokine concentrations (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, interleukin [IL]-6 and soluble IL-2 receptor) were investigated. In a prospective one-year follow-up study, changes in coronary endothelial function and cytokine levels were compared between 11 hypercholesterolemic patients treated with simvastatin and 9 controls. RESULTS: Epicardial and microvascular endothelial functions were better in groups 1 and 3 than they were in group 2 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). Transcardiac IL-6 and TNF-alpha gradients were significantly increased in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 (IL-6: p < 0.05; TNF-alpha: p < 0.01). Plaque areas were significantly increased in groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05 vs. group 3), whereas lumen area was increased in group 2 compared with group 1 (p < 0.05), demonstrating adaptive vascular remodeling. In patients treated with simvastatin, coronary endothelial function and cardiac cytokine activity significantly improved during the one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of allograft inflammatory activity and attenuation of the coronary endothelial dysfunction observed in cardiac transplant recipients during treatment with simvastatin may represent an important mechanism by which HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors protect against the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Coronary Angiography↗
PubMed2003

Effect of simvastatin on the uptake and metabolic conversion of palmitic, dihomo-gamma-linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids in A549 cells.

It is well known that simvastatin affects cholesterol synthesis. Furthermore it inhibits growth and proliferation and perturbs fatty acid metabolism in some cell lines. We have studied the effects of simvastatin on the uptake and metabolism of exogenous fatty acid in the human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. Simvastatin inhibited the proliferation of A549, and caused an increment in phospholipid/cholesterol ratio due to an increment in phospholipid content without affecting cholesterol content. All the fatty acids were uptaken and metabolized in both control and treated cells. The conversion of palmitic, linoleic and dihomo-gamma-linoleic acids to their metabolites and products/precursor ratios for the desaturation and elongation reactions showed that simvastatin enhanced the Delta5 desaturation step and altered some elongating steps. The machinery for unsaturated fatty acid synthesis in A549 is quite sensitive to simvastatin and its effects could have important implication taking into account that highly unsaturated fatty acids are involved in the regulation of diverse cellular functions by themselves or through their metabolites.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Simvastatin reduces plasma concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in type 2 diabetic patients with hyperlipidemia.

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is positively associated with the prevalence of coronary artery disease by epidemiologic data. Prospective studies indicate that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors reduced the plasma hs-CRP concentration and the risk of recurrent coronary events after myocardial infarction. Type 2 diabetes is associated with high mortality risk of coronary heart disease and this high risk may be involved in the inflammatory factors. We have therefore conducted a prospective study to assess whether simvastatin can rapidly reduce the plasma hs-CRP concentration in type 2 diabetic patients with hyperlipidemia. Seventeen type 2 diabetic patients with hyperlipidemia were enrolled in the study after 6 weeks on a lipid-lowering diet. Fourteen patients completed the study, taking simvastatin 20 mg daily for 8 weeks. Fasting blood samples were collected from each patient before and after 8-week administration of simvastatin. In response to 8-week administration of simvastatin, hs-CRP levels significantly decreased from 0.312+/-0.057 to 0.193+/-0.045 mg/dl (P<.01). Plasma LDL cholesterol also decreased significantly from 130+/-9 to 74+/-3 mg/dl (P=.001). This study shows that plasma hs-CRP concentration can be reduced by 8-week administration of simvastatin in type 2 diabetic patients with hyperlipidemia.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed2003

Effect of simvastatin treatment on bone mineral density and bone turnover in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women: a 1-year longitudinal study.

Although several studies have reported a lower risk of osteoporotic fracture in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, so far longitudinal studies on the effects of statins on bone are lacking. The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover changes induced by 1-year simvastatin treatment on postmenopausal women. Thirty consecutive postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women (61.2 +/- 4.9 years) were treated for 12 months with 40 mg/day simvastatin and 30 normocholesterolemic age-matched postmenopausal women provided control data. In all subjects, at baseline and at 3-month intervals, serum lipids, calcium, phosphate, total and bone alkaline phosphatase (Bone-ALP), and carboxy-terminal fragment of type I collagen (CTx) were measured in a fasting blood sample. At baseline and after 6 and 12 months BMD was measured at lumbar spine (BMD-LS) and at femur (BMD-Ftot) and at femoral neck (BMD-Fn) by DXA. In the simvastatin-treated group Bone-ALP showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) with respect to baseline from the sixth month, whereas serum CTx showed a weak and nonsignificant increase over the study period. In treated women BMD-LS, BMD-Fn, and BMD-Ftot increased respectively by 1.1, 0.9, and 0.4% at Month 6; and by 2.8, 1.0, and 0.8% at Month 12. In controls BMD-LS, BMD-Fn, and BMD-Ftot at the end of the study period decreased by 1.6, 1.4, and 1.2%, respectively. The difference between controls and simvastatin-treated patients was significant (P < 0.05) for both BMD-LS and BMD-Fn only at Month 12. In conclusion our results, although obtained from a small sample of postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women, suggest a probable positive effect of simvastatin on bone formation and BMD.

Aged↗