Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Notch”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources

Neurogenic phenotypes and altered Notch processing in Drosophila Presenilin mutants.

Presenilin proteins have been implicated both in developmental signalling by the cell-surface protein Notch and in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Loss of presenilin function leads to Notch/lin-12-like mutant phenotypes in Caenorhabditis elegans and to reduced Notch1 expression in the mouse paraxial mesoderm. In humans, presenilins that are associated with Alzheimer's disease stimulate overproduction of the neurotoxic 42-amino-acid beta-amyloid derivative (Abeta42) of the amyloid-precursor protein APP. Here we describe loss-of-function mutations in the Drosophila Presenilin gene that cause lethal Notch-like phenotypes such as maternal neurogenic effects during embryogenesis, loss of lateral inhibition within proneural cell clusters, and absence of wing margin formation. We show that presenilin is required for the normal proteolytic production of carboxy-terminal Notch fragments that are needed for receptor maturation and signalling, and that genetically it acts upstream of both the membrane-bound form and the activated nuclear form of Notch. Our findings provide evidence for the existence of distinct processing sites or modifications in the extracellular domain of Notch. They also link the role of presenilin in Notch signalling to its effect on amyloid production in Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer Disease↗

t(11;19)(q21;p13) translocation in mucoepidermoid carcinoma creates a novel fusion product that disrupts a Notch signaling pathway.

Truncation of Notch1 has been shown to cause a subtype of acute leukemia, and activation of Notch4 has been associated with mammary and salivary gland carcinomas of mice. Here we identify a new mechanism for disrupting Notch signaling in human tumorigenesis, characterized by altered function of a new ortholog of the Drosophila melanogaster Notch co-activator molecule Mastermind. We cloned the t(11;19) translocation that underlies the most common type of human malignant salivary gland tumor. This rearrangement fuses exon 1 from a novel gene of unknown function at 19p13, termed mucoepidermoid carcinoma translocated 1 (MECT1), with exons 2-5 of a novel member of the Mastermind-like gene family (MAML2) at 11q21 (ref. 3). Similar to D. melanogaster Mastermind and MAML1 (refs. 4,5), full-length MAML2 functioned as a CSL (CBF-1, suppressor of hairless and Lag-1)-dependent transcriptional co-activator for ligand-stimulated Notch. In contrast, MECT1-MAML2 activated transcription of the Notch target gene HES1 independently of both Notch ligand and CSL binding sites. MECT1-MAML2 induced foci formation in RK3E epithelial cells, confirming a biological effect for the fusion product. These data suggest a new mechanism to disrupt the function of a Notch co-activator in a common type of malignant salivary gland tumor.

Animals↗

Integration of Notch and Wnt signaling in hematopoietic stem cell maintenance.

A fundamental question in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) biology is how self-renewal is controlled. Here we show that the molecular regulation of two critical elements of self-renewal, inhibition of differentiation and induction of proliferation, can be uncoupled, and we identify Notch signaling as a key factor in inhibiting differentiation. Using transgenic Notch reporter mice, we found that Notch signaling was active in HSCs in vivo and downregulated as HSCs differentiated. Inhibition of Notch signaling led to accelerated differentiation of HSCs in vitro and depletion of HSCs in vivo. Finally, intact Notch signaling was required for Wnt-mediated maintenance of undifferentiated HSCs but not for survival or entry into the cell cycle in vitro. These data suggest that Notch signaling has a dominant function in inhibiting differentiation and provide a model for how HSCs may integrate multiple signals to maintain the stem cell state.

Animals↗

Notch signaling controls the generation and differentiation of early T lineage progenitors.

Signaling by the transmembrane receptor Notch is critical for T lineage development, but progenitor subsets that first receive Notch signals have not been defined. Here we identify an immature subset of early T lineage progenitors (ETPs) in the thymus that expressed the tyrosine kinase receptor Flt3 and had preserved B lineage potential at low progenitor frequency. Notch signaling was active in ETPs and was required for generation of the ETP population. Additionally, Notch signals contributed to the subsequent differentiation of ETPs. In contrast, multipotent hematopoietic progenitors circulated in the blood even in the absence of Notch signaling, suggesting that critical Notch signals during early T lineage development are delivered early after thymic entry.

Animals↗

The Notch-Hes pathway in mammalian neural development.

A wide variety of neurons and glial cells differentiate from common precursor cells in the developing nervous system. During this process, Notch-mediated cell-cell interaction is essential for maintenance of dividing cells and subsequent generation of cell type diversity. Activation of Notch inhibits cellular differentiation, and abnormality of the Notch pathway leads to premature neuronal differentiation, the lack of some cell types, and severe defects of tissue morphogenesis. Recent data demonstrate that Notch fails to inhibit cellular differentiation in the absence of the bHLH genes Hes1 and Hes5, which functionally antagonize the neuronal bHLH genes such as Mash1. These results indicate that the two Hes genes are essential effectors for the Notch pathway and that neuronal differentiation is controlled by the pathway "Notch-Hes1/Hes5-|Mash1".

Animals↗

Notch targets the Cdk inhibitor Xic1 to regulate differentiation but not the cell cycle in neurons.

The proneural protein neurogenin (XNGNR1) drives differentiation of primary neurons in combination with the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor Xic1. Differentiation is inhibited by Notch signalling, resulting in a scattered neuronal distribution. Here we show that Notch signalling regulates the level of Xic1 transcription, yet this does not correlate with Notch's ability to perturb the cell cycle. Instead, Notch may regulate Xic1 levels to control its differentiation function directly, which is required in parallel with XNGNR1 to promote primary neurogenesis. Indeed, Notch-mediated repression of both XNGNR1 and Xic1 must be relieved for neuronal differentiation to occur. Interestingly, although Xic1 is required for XNGNR1-mediated neurogenesis, it is not required for XNGNR1-mediated upregulation of Delta, allowing establishment of the negative feedback loop involved in lateral inhibition. Therefore, Notch targets Cdk inhibitor expression to regulate differentiation of primary neurons, and its effects on the cell cycle may be of secondary importance.

Animals↗

Ras pathway signals are required for notch-mediated oncogenesis.

The Notch genes of C. elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and vertebrates encode receptors responsible for cell fate decisions during development. These Notch receptors and their ligands, Delta and Jagged, have been implicated in several human diseases. Truncated, constitutively active mutant forms of the Notch receptor appear to be involved in human T-cell leukemia, mammary carcinomas in mice, and a tumorous germline phenotype in C. elegans. Since activated Notch induces solitary tumors in transgenic mice, it is highly likely that collaborating genetic events are required for tumor formation. We have assessed four signal transduction pathways to determine which might play additional roles in malignant transformation in concert with activated Notch4. Our results suggest that transformation by Notch does not, as might have been expected, depend on the Src-like kinases Lck and Fyn, nor upon signals from protein kinase A and C (PKA, PKC). Rather, transformation by Notch requires active signals from the Erk/MAP kinase and PI-3 kinase pathways downstream of Ras. Oncogene (2000) 19, 4191 - 4198

Animals↗

Distinct transcriptional programs in thymocytes responding to T cell receptor, Notch, and positive selection signals.

T cell antigen receptor (TCR) signaling is necessary but not sufficient to promote the positive selection of CD4+CD8+ thymocytes into CD4+ or CD8+ mature T cells. Notch signaling has also been implicated as a potential regulator of both CD4/CD8 T cell development and TCR signaling. However, the relationship between positive selection, TCR signaling, and Notch remains unclear. Here we use DNA microarray analysis to compare gene expression changes in CD4+CD8+ double-positive thymocytes undergoing positive selection, TCR stimulation, and Notch activation. We find that the genes induced during positive selection can be resolved into two distinct sets. One set, which we term "TCR-induced," is also induced by in vitro TCR stimulation and contains a large proportion of transcription factors. A second set, which we term "positive-selection-induced," is not induced by in vitro TCR simulation and contains a large proportion of genes involved in signal transduction pathways. Genes induced by Notch activity overlap substantially with genes induced during positive selection. We also find that Notch activity potentiates the effects of TCR stimulation on gene expression. These results help to identify TCR- and positive-selection-specific transcriptional events and help to clarify the relationship between positive selection and Notch.

Animals↗

Notch receptor cleavage depends on but is not directly executed by presenilins.

Notch receptors undergo three distinct proteolytic cleavages during maturation and activation. The third cleavage occurs within the plasma membrane and results in the release and translocation of the intracellular domain into the nucleus to execute Notch signaling. This so-called gamma-secretase cleavage is under the control of presenilins, but it is not known whether presenilins themselves carry out the cleavage or whether they act by means of yet-unidentified gamma-secretase(s). In this article, we show that Notch intracellular cleavage in intact cells completely depends on presenilins. In contrast, partial purification of the Notch cleavage activity reveals an activity, which is present only in protein extracts from presenilin-containing cells, and which does not comigrate with presenilin. This finding provides evidence for the existence of a specific Notch-processing activity, which is physically distinct from presenilins. We conclude from these experiments that presenilins are critically required for Notch intracellular cleavage but are not themselves directly mediating the cleavage.

Acetylcysteine↗

Fringe modulation of Jagged1-induced Notch signaling requires the action of beta 4galactosyltransferase-1.

Fringe modulates Notch signaling resulting in the establishment of compartmental boundaries in developing organisms. Fringe is a beta 3N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (beta 3GlcNAcT) that transfers GlcNAc to O-fucose in epidermal growth factor-like repeats of Notch. Here we use five different Chinese hamster ovary cell glycosylation mutants to identify a key aspect of the mechanism of fringe action. Although the beta 3GlcNAcT activity of manic or lunatic fringe is shown to be necessary for inhibition of Jagged1-induced Notch signaling in a coculture assay, it is not sufficient. Fringe fails to inhibit Notch signaling if the disaccharide generated by fringe action, GlcNAc beta 3Fuc, is not elongated. The trisaccharide, Gal beta 4GlcNAc beta 3Fuc, is the minimal O-fucose glycan to support fringe modulation of Notch signaling. Of six beta 4galactosyltransferases (beta 4GalT) in Chinese hamster ovary cells, only beta 4GalT-1 is required to add Gal to GlcNAc beta 3Fuc, identifying beta 4GalT-1 as a new modulator of Notch signaling.

Animals↗

Members of the HRT family of basic helix-loop-helix proteins act as transcriptional repressors downstream of Notch signaling.

The Hairy-related transcription-factor (HRT) genes encode three related basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that show sequence similarity to the Hairy and Enhancer of split family of transcriptional repressors. HRT proteins are expressed in specific regions of the developing heart, vasculature, pharyngeal arches and somites, and the periodicity of their expression in somitic precursors mirrors that of Notch signaling-related molecules. In the present study, we show that the intracellular domain of the Notch1 receptor (Notch1 IC), which is constitutively active, up-regulates HRT2 expression in 10T(1/2) fibroblasts. Luciferase reporter assays using the regulatory regions of the mouse HRT genes revealed that transcription of all three genes is stimulated by Notch1 IC. The promoters of the HRT genes share homology in a binding site for Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], a transcriptional mediator of Notch signaling. A dominant-negative Su(H) mutant abolished Notch-activated HRT2 expression, and mutation of the conserved Su(H) consensus site in the HRT2 promoter attenuated transcriptional activation by Notch. Ectopic expression of HRT proteins also blocked activation of HRT2 expression by Notch1 IC through a mechanism requiring the basic region, but not the conserved carboxyl-terminal YQPW-TEVGAF motif of HRT2. These findings identify HRT genes as downstream targets for Notch signaling and reveal a negative autoregulatory loop whereby HRT proteins repress their own expression through interference with Notch signaling.

Animals↗

Notch signaling in the development of the inner ear: lessons from Drosophila.

The sensory patches in the ear of a vertebrate can be compared with the mechanosensory bristles of a fly. This comparison has led to the discovery that lateral inhibition mediated by the Notch cell-cell signaling pathway, first characterized in Drosophila and crucial for bristle development, also has a key role in controlling the pattern of sensory hair cells and supporting cells in the ear. We review the arguments for considering the sensory patches of the vertebrate ear and bristles of the insect to be homologous structures, evolved from a common ancestral mechanosensory organ, and we examine more closely the role of Notch signaling in each system. Using viral vectors to misexpress components of the Notch pathway in the chick ear, we show that a simple lateral-inhibition model based on feedback regulation of the Notch ligand Delta is inadequate for the ear just as it is for the fly bristle. The Notch ligand Serrate1, expressed in supporting cells in the ear, is regulated by lateral induction, not lateral inhibition; commitment to become a hair cell is not simply controlled by levels of expression of the Notch ligands Delta1, Serrate1, and Serrate2 in the neighbors of the nascent hair cell; and at least one factor, Numb, capable of blocking reception of lateral inhibition is concentrated in hair cells. These findings reinforce the parallels between the vertebrate ear and the fly bristle and show how study of the insect system can help us understand the vertebrate.

Animals↗

Role of Deltex-1 as a transcriptional regulator downstream of the Notch receptor.

Intercellular signaling through the cell-surface receptor Notch plays important roles in a variety of developmental processes as well as in pathogenesis of some human cancers and genetic disorders. However, the mechanisms by which Notch signals are transduced into cells still remain elusive. Here we investigated the signaling mechanisms for Notch in the cell fate control of neural progenitor cells. We show that Deltex-1 (DTX1), a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Deltex, mediates a Notch signal to block differentiation of neural progenitor cells. We found that a significant fraction of DTX1 proteins were localized in the nucleus and physically interacted with the transcriptional coactivator p300. Through its binding to p300, DTX1 inhibited transcriptional activation by the neural-specific helix-loop-helix-type transcription factor MASH1, and this mechanism is likely responsible for the differentiation inhibition of neural progenitor cells. Our results further suggest that DTX1 regulates transcription independently of the previously characterized Notch signaling pathway involving RBP-J and HES1/HES5. Thus, DTX1 serves as an important signaling component downstream of Notch that regulates transcription in the nucleus.

Animals↗

Proteolysis of chimeric beta-amyloid precursor proteins containing the Notch transmembrane domain yields amyloid beta-like peptides.

gamma-Secretase is an unusual intramembranous protease that has been reported to cleave the beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP) near the middle of its transmembrane domain (TMD) but cleave Notch near the cytoplasmic end of its TMD. To ascertain whether the TMD sequence of the substrate determines where gamma-secretase cleaves and whether the region just before the TMD participates in recognition by the enzyme, we expressed chimeric human APP molecules containing either the TMD or pre-TMD regions of Notch or other transmembrane proteins. APP chimeras bearing either the Notch or the amyloid precursor-like protein-2 TMD released similar amounts of approximately 4-kDa amyloid beta-peptide (Abeta)-like peptides as did intact APP. Mass spectrometry revealed that the principal Abeta-like peptide ended at residue 40, indicating cleavage at the middle of the Notch TMD in the chimera. Generation of Abeta-like peptides was significantly decreased when the APP TMD was replaced by those of SREBP-1 or human epithelial growth factor receptor 3. Replacement of the APP pre-TMD region (Abeta 10-28) with that of SREBP-1 increased generation of Abeta-like peptides, while those of human epithelial growth factor receptor 3 or amyloid precursor-like protein-2 decreased it. We conclude that gamma-secretase can cleave near the middle of the Notch TMD, that Abeta-like peptides may arise during Notch processing, and that the pre-TMD sequence of the substrate influences recognition or binding by the enzyme.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Notch activation suppresses fibroblast growth factor-dependent cellular transformation.

Aberrant activations of the Notch and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathways have been correlated with neoplastic growth in humans and other mammals. Here we report that the suppression of Notch signaling in NIH 3T3 cells by the expression of either the extracellular domain of the Notch ligand Jagged1 or dominant-negative forms of Notch1 and Notch2 results in the appearance of an exaggerated fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-dependent transformed phenotype characterized by anchorage-independent growth in soft agar. Anchorage-independent growth exhibited by Notch-repressed NIH 3T3 cells may result from prolonged FGFR stimulation caused by both an increase in the expression of prototypic and oncogenic FGF gene family members and the nonclassical export of FGF1 into the extracellular compartment. Interestingly, FGF exerts a negative effect on Notch by suppressing CSL (CBF-1/RBP-Jk/KBF2 in mammals, Su(H) in Drosophila and Xenopus, and Lag-2 in Caenorhabditis elegans)-dependent transcription, and the ectopic expression of constitutively active forms of Notch1 or Notch2 abrogates FGF1 release and the phenotypic effects of FGFR stimulation. These data suggest that communication between the Notch and FGFR pathways may represent an important reciprocal autoregulatory mechanism for the regulation of normal cell growth.

3T3 Cells↗

Notch signaling and ERK activation are important for the osteomimetic properties of prostate cancer bone metastatic cell lines.

Prostate cancer bone metastases are characterized by their ability to induce osteoblastic lesions and local bone formation. It has been suggested that bone metastatic prostate cancer cells are osteomimetic and capable of expressing genes and proteins typically expressed by osteoblasts. The ability of preosteoblasts to differentiate and express osteoblastic genes depends on several pathways, including Notch and MAPK. Here we show that notch1 expression is increased 4-5 times in C4-2B and MDA PCa 2b cells (osteoblastic skeletal prostate metastatic cancer cell lines) when compared with nonskeletal metastatic cell lines (LNCaP and DU145). Notch1 ligand, dll1, is expressed only in C4-2B cells. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrate that Notch1 is present in both human clinical samples from prostate cancer bone metastases and the C4-2B cell line. To determine whether prostate cancer bone metastases respond to osteogenic induction similar to osteoblasts, C4-2B cells were cultured in osteogenic medium that promotes mineralization. C4-2B cells mineralize and express HES-1 (a downstream target of Notch), an effect that is completely inhibited by L-685,458, a Notch activity inhibitor. Furthermore, osteogenic induction increases ERK activation, runx2 expression, and nuclear localization, independent of Notch signaling. Finally, we show that Notch and ERK activation are essential for Runx2 DNA binding activity and osteocalcin gene expression in C4-2B cells in response to osteogenic induction. These studies demonstrate that prostate cancer bone metastatic cell lines acquire osteoblastic properties through independent activation of ERK and Notch signaling; presumably, both pathways are activated in the bone microenvironment.

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins↗

Notch oncoproteins depend on gamma-secretase/presenilin activity for processing and function.

During normal development Notch receptor signaling is important in regulating numerous cell fate decisions. Mutations that truncate the extracellular domain of Notch receptors can cause aberrant signaling and promote unregulated cell growth. We have examined two types of truncated Notch oncoproteins that arise from proviral insertion into the Notch4 gene (Notch4/int-3) or a chromosomal translocation involving the Notch1 gene (TAN-1). Both Notch4/int-3 and TAN-1 oncoproteins lack most or all of their ectodomain. Normal Notch signaling requires gamma-secretase/presenilin-mediated proteolytic processing, but whether Notch oncoproteins are also dependent on gamma-secretase/presenilin activity is not known. We demonstrate that Notch4/int-3-induced activation of the downstream transcription factor, CSL, is abrogated in cells deficient in presenilins or treated with a pharmacological inhibitor of gamma-secretase/presenilins. Furthermore, we find that both Notch4/int-3 and TAN-1 accumulate at the cell surface, where presenilin-dependent cleavage occurs, when gamma-secretase/presenilin activity is inhibited. gamma-Secretase/presenilin inhibition effectively blocks cellular responses to Notch4/int-3, but not TAN-1, apparently because some TAN-1 polypeptides lack transmembrane domains and do not require gamma-secretase/presenilin activity for nuclear access. These studies highlight potential uses and limitations of gamma-secretase/presenilin inhibitors in targeted therapy of Notch-related neoplasms.

Adenoviridae↗

The Lin12-notch repeats of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A bind calcium and determine its proteolytic specificity.

The Lin12-Notch repeat (LNR) module of about 35 residues is a hallmark of the Notch receptor family. Three copies, arranged in tandem, are invariably present in the extracellular portion of the Notch receptors. Although their function is unknown, genetic and biochemical data indicate that the LNR modules participate in the regulation of ligand-induced proteolytic cleavage of the Notch receptor, a prerequisite to intramembrane cleavage and Notch signaling. Outside the Notch receptor family, the LNR module is present only in the metalloproteinase pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and its homologue PAPP-A2, which also contain three copies. Curiously, LNR modules 1 and 2 are present within the proteolytic domain of PAPP-A/A2, but LNR3 is separated from LNR2 by more than 1000 amino acids. The growth factor antagonists insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-4 and -5 are both substrates of PAPP-A. We provide here evidence that the PAPP-A LNR modules function together to determine the proteolytic specificity of PAPP-A. Analysis of C-terminally truncated PAPP-A mutants followed by the analysis of LNR deletion mutants demonstrated that each of the three PAPP-A LNR modules is strictly required for proteolytic activity against IGFBP-4 but not for proteolytic activity against IGFBP-5. Individual substitution of conserved LNR residues predicted to participate in calcium coordination caused elimination (D341A, D356A, D389A, D1484A, D1499A, and D1502A) or a significant reduction (D359A and E392A) of IGFBP-4 proteolysis, whereas IGFBP-5 proteolysis was unaffected. The activity of the latter mutants against IGFBP-4 could be partially rescued by calcium, and the addition of the calcium-binding protein calbindin D9k to wild-type PAPP-A eliminated activity against IGFBP-4 but not against IGFBP-5, demonstrating that the PAPP-A LNR modules bind calcium ions. We propose a model in which LNR3 is spatially localized in proximity to LNR1 and -2, forming a single functional unit.

Amino Acid Sequence↗