Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Needlestick Injuries”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources

Prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among Makerere University medical students.

BACKGROUND: Medical students in the course of their clinical work are at risk of acquiring hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or transmitting it to their patients. HBV immunization for medical students in Uganda is recommended but not strictly enforced. It is important to assess the prevalence of HBV infection in medical students in order to improve on the interventions to control this infection among them. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess the seroprevalence rates of HBsAg and anti-HBc among clinical and preclinical medical students. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study done over three months from November 2000 to January 2001 among Makerere University Medical students. A random sample of medical students was recruited from both the pre-clinical and clinical years. Blood samples from each participant were tested for HBsAg and anti-HBc. RESULTS: The overall prevalence was 11.0% for HBsAg and 65.9% for anti HBc. Nine pre-clinical students (12.2%) were positive for HBsAg compared to 11 (10.2%) clinical students. This difference was not statistically significant. However, clinical students were more likely to have been exposed to HBV with 86 (79.6%) testing positive for anti-HBc compared to 34 (45.9%) among preclinical students (p-value <001). Risk factors associated HBV infection included having a sexual relationship, accidental needlestick injuries, and unprotected exposure to patients' body fluids. CONCLUSION: Medical students need to be offered more sensitization and support regarding prevention of HBV infection including vaccination and the use of universal precautions for infection control.

Adult↗

The long-term immunity among health care workers vaccinated against hepatitis B virus in a large referral hospital in southern Iran.

BACKGROUND: Health care workers are at increased risk of occupational exposure to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Reassessment for revaccination of such high-risk persons after 10 years may be appropriate if anti-HBs antibody titers declined below 10 mlU/mL. This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term efficacy of HBV vaccine in health care workers and the need for their reassessment for revaccination. METHODS: We interviewed 600 health care workers in a referral hospital in Shiraz, southern Iran. They were asked to complete a confidential questionnaire including information on their age, gender, vaccination date, number of doses of vaccine, their job description in hospital, previous history of needlestick injury, and educational level. Anti-HBs antibodies were determined by the ELISA method and titers of >10 mlU/mL were considered protective. Those with a positive HBsAg or anti-HBcAb were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Among 600 health care workers interviewed, 339 subjects who accepted to participate in the study, were vaccinated with three doses of HBV vaccine. Anti-HBsAb titers were >100 mlU/mL in 211 subjects (62.2%), 10 - 100 mlU/mL in 85 (25.1%), and <10 mlU/mL in 43 (12.7%) persons. Among 339 subjects who received three doses of vaccine, 273 were vaccinated less than 5 years, 47 cases between 5 - 10 years, and 19 cases were vaccinated more than 10 years before the study. The majority of them had an antibody concentration above the protective level (88.1%, 88.9%, and 60.9%, respectively, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reassessment for revaccination in health care workers should be considered according to their anti-HBsAb levels 10 years after vaccination. In our health care workers, we think that due to the existence of low immunity against HBV, reassessment for revaccination after 10 years is mandatory.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay↗

Oral trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole levels in stable HIV-infected children.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) requires therapeutic serum concentrations of 5-10 microg/ml trimethoprim (TMP); consequently intravenous trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) is recommended therapy. However, oral therapy is desirable as the intravenous route is costly, time-consuming, more difficult to administer and carries a risk of needlestick injury. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether therapeutic TMP levels for treatment of PCP can be attained with oral therapy in HIV-infected children. METHODS: A prospective dose-escalation study was undertaken of serum TMP levels attained following oral doses of TMP of 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg in stable HIV-infected children. Children who received a 20 mg/kg dose were randomised to get a second dose (5 or 10 mg/kg TMP) at 6 hours. TMP levels were measured at baseline, peak (3 hours), and trough (6 hours) using liquid chromatography. An additional TMP level was taken at 9 hours in those who received a second TMP dose. RESULTS: Median (25th-75th percentile) peak serum TMP levels following a 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg oral loading dose were 0.93 (0.5-1.5) microg/ml, 1.94 (1.4-2.2) microg/ml and 7.68 (6.1-7.8) microg/ml respectively. Peak TMP levels at 9 hours after a second TMP dose of 5 or 10 mg/kg were 6.98 (3.4-8.8) microg/ml and 9.25 (8.2-10.3) microg/ml respectively. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic concentrations of TMP for treatment of P. jiroveci can be attained with an oral loading dose of 20 mg/kg and sustained with a second dose at 6 hours of either 5 mg or 10 mg/kg in stable HIV-infected children.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Universal precautions to prevent HIV transmission to health care workers: an economic analysis.

The universal precautions recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Atlanta, for the prevention of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) transmission to health care workers are widely accepted, despite little documentation of their effectiveness and efficiency. We reviewed the evidence on the risk of HIV transmission to hospital workers and the effectiveness of the universal precautions. We also evaluated the costs of implementing the recommendations in a 450-bed acute care teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ont. On the basis of aggregated results from six prospective studies the risk of HIV seroconversion among hospital workers after a needlestick injury involving a patient known to have AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is 0.36% (upper 95% confidence limit 0.67%); the risk after skin and mucous membrane exposure to blood or other body fluids of AIDS patients is 0% (upper 95% confidence limit 0.38%). We estimated that 0.038 cases of HIV seroconversion would be prevented annually in the study hospital if the CDC recommendations were followed. The incremental cost of implementing the universal precautions was estimated to be about $315,000 per year, or over $8 million per case of HIV seroconversion prevented. If all HIV-infected workers were assumed to have AIDS within 10 years of infection the of the program would be about $565,000 per life-year saved. When less conservative, more probable assumptions were applied the best estimate of the implementation cost was $128,862,000 per case of HIV seroconversion prevented. The universal precautions implemented in the study hospital were not found to be efficacious or cost-effective. To minimize the already small risk of HIV transmission in hospitals the sources of risk of percutaneous injury should be better defined and the design of percutaneous lines, needles and surgical equipment as well as techniques improved. Preventive measures recommended on the basis of demonstrated efficacy and aimed at routes of exposure that represent true risk are needed.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

HIV infection risk to health-care workers.

The risk of occupationally acquired human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in exposed health-care workers has been estimated to be 0.5% after accidental needlestick with an HIV-contaminated needle. Needlestick injuries resulting in parenteral exposure to HIV-infected material are the most common reported cause of occupational HIV infection in health-care workers. With 60% of these exposures unpreventable even with strict adherence to current infection control procedures, it is necessary to develop technical changes in work protection in order to further reduce the risk.

Anxiety↗

AIDS and the minority health care worker.

1. Large groups of health care workers, many of whom are among ethnic minorities with potential for occupational exposure to HIV/HBV, are generally underserved in training on prevention of occupational transmission of the viruses. 2. The inadequacy of training for indirect client care personnel appears to be one of the primary reasons for high rates of needlestick injuries and exposure to blood. 3. Training in appropriate infection control techniques can help reduce the uneasiness and fear among health care workers over occupationally-related HIV/HBV transmission.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Therapeutic measures after hepatitis B virus infection: postexposure prophylaxis.

Hepatitis B postexposure prophylaxis is here reviewed. Every contact with hepatitis B virus can cause an infection which may be either acute, subclinical, or progressive, the latter potentially leading to chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Direct injection of large quantities of HBsAg-positive blood is almost invariably contagious. While casual person-to-person contact rarely causes disease, the multiplicity of exposure in the hospital environment or the home increases the risk for transmission. Several studies have shown that postexposure prophylaxis using passive immunization with specific hepatitis B antibodies is possible. Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) with a minimum titre of 100 IU/ml should be used. In practice, most preparations contain 500 IU/ml. The use of HBIG post-exposure prophylaxis should be limited to needlestick injury, sexual exposure, and perinatal contact of neonates with HBsAg-positive mothers. Routine vaccination as an adjunct to HBIG administration is recommended. HBIG does not decrease the immunogenic properties of the vaccine provided that the injection is not made at the same site. With increasing use of hepatitis B vaccines, the need for therapeutic intervention will hopefully be considerably diminished. Prevention rather than therapy should be stressed.

Body Fluids↗

Contamination of blood cultures by switch-needle and nonswitch-needle techniques in a paediatric ward.

To compare the contamination rates of blood culture between the conventional switching to a sterile needle before inoculation of blood culture bottles and the nonswitch-needle technique, we conducted a prospective crossover study in a pediatric infectious disease ward at Lampang Hospital, Thailand from November 1991 to December 1992. The total number of blood cultures was 764 in which 358 were in the switch-needle group and 406 in the nonswitch-needle group. The rates of contamination were almost identical among the two groups (6.15% v.s. 6.16%). It is concluded that careful skin preparation and good handwashing practices of the phlebotomists and assistant are more important factors than switching needles in reducing contamination during collection of blood for culture. Switching needle technique should be discontinued to reduce the risk of needlestick injury and the cost of blood culture.

Blood↗

Reducing risks through quality improvement, infection control, and risk management.

Health care organizations in America are undergoing major changes. As these changes are occurring, organizations are being asked to demonstrate how they monitor and improve their services to provide cost-effective, quality care. The integration of quality improvement methodologies, risk management programs, and infection-control systems provides the structure necessary for identifying organization risks and attempting to eliminate them. This integration is demonstrated by a case study for reducing needlestick injuries in the intensive care unit.

Critical Care↗

Geographic differences in the attitudes, knowledge and infection control practices of Ontario dentists.

Geographic differences in the HIV related attitudes, knowledge and behaviours of 5,997 dentists in Ontario were investigated using mailed questionnaires (response rate 70%). Proportionately more respondents from larger population centres reported that they knowingly treated HIV-infected patients (p < 0.00001), they were unwilling to treat HIV-infected patients (p < 0.05), they had an exaggerated perception of the risk of HIV infection after a needlestick injury (p < 0.01), they were concerned about personal risk (p < 0.01) and staff fears (p < 0.05) related to HIV/AIDS, and that patients with HIV or AIDS should be treated in hospitals/specialized practices (p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis controlling for age, sex, and specialty, showed that respondents who practised in smaller population centres were significantly more willing to treat HIV-infected patients ( < 10,000, odds ratio = 1.6; 10,000-49,999, odds ratio = 1.3). Significantly fewer respondents in the Central West, and Central East Health Planning Region, where AIDS is most prevalent, reported that they were willing to treat HIV patients.

Adult↗

Nurses' body fluid exposure reporting, HIV testing, and hepatitis B vaccination rates: before and after implementing universal precautions regulations.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether mandatory universal precautions changed nurses' body fluid exposure and reporting rates, hepatitis B vaccination rates, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing rates. Random cross-sectional surveys of nurses in Tennessee were conducted in 1991 and 1993 (n = 145 in 1991; n = 143 in 1993). The questionnaire in both surveys included frequency of body fluid exposures and reporting in the past year, and whether or not the respondent had received the hepatitis B vaccine or had been HIV tested. Findings indicated that self reported needlestick injuries decreased by 69%, and other sharps injuries decreased by 81%. Only 4.1% of all exposure incidents reported on this anonymous survey were reported to employee health officials, as required. Body fluid exposure incidents were the most common form of exposure (81%) and the most underreported. Hepatitis B vaccinations significantly increased (61.4% to 82.5%), with a nonsignificant increased in HIV testing (47.2% to 55.6%) from 1991 to 1993. Findings of this study suggest that the universal precautions regulatory mandate has been effective in increasing nurses' compliance to universal precautions. Body fluid contacts were significantly underreported and showed no decrease between 1991 and 1993.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗

Diagnosis and management of complications of self-injection injuries of the neck.

When IVDUs who lose peripheral access turn to their necks, they invite a spectrum of unique complications that require particular management and treatment. While many of these complications are infectious, other possibilities include vocal cord paralysis and needle fragment foreign bodies. Work-up of these patients must include a very thorough history and physical exam, particularly of the head and neck, complete with a laryngeal exam. All patients should undergo imaging studies, including plain films, CT or MRI of the neck, and other studies as appropriate. Laboratory studies should include HIV and hepatitis serologies. Because of the risks to the surgical team, neck explorations, when indicated, should be performed under general anesthesia with strict adherence to universal precautions. Further management includes early referrals to methadone clinics, although unfortunately poor patient compliance is usual. Public campaigns aimed at prevention are useful, although limited, and should be encouraged.

Adult↗

Intravenous cannulation: potential complications.

The procedure of establishing peripheral venous access carries the risk of potential complications to both the patient and the practitioner. Complications include infection, phlebitis and thrombophlebitis, emboli, pain, haematoma or haemorrhage, extravasation, arterial cannulation and needlestick injuries. Careful adherence to guidelines and procedures can minimise these risks.

Catheterization, Peripheral↗

[Screening for hepatitis C of hospital personnel at the Szent László Hospital of Budapest].

UNLABELLED: The health-care workers are known to be at risk of occupational transmission of blood-borne viruses. The goal of the investigation was to determine the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody and the occupational risk of HCV transmission among personnel at the Central. Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary. Serum samples of 409 health-care workers were tested for antibody to HCV with second and third generation ELISA-s and anti-HCV positive samples were confirmed with Western Blot Line EIA. A total of 10 (2.4%) of the health-care workers were confirmed to be anti-HCV positive. The prevalence of anti-HCV increased with advancing age: zero under 20 yr age group (N = 0/15), 0.9% in 21-30 yr age group (N = 1/112), 1.8% in 31-40 yr age group (N = 2/111), 3.1% in 41-50 yr age group (N = 3/96) and 4.0% in above 50 yr age group (N = 3/75). We found anti-HCV positive hospital worker in 9 out of 17 departments. The prevalence of hepatitis C antibody was 7.1-1.9% among the personnel of internal departments, pathology, intensive care unit and pediatric departments. No anti-HCV positive health-care worker was found in the surgery and laboratories. None of the physicians tested was seropositive for HCV. Eight of the nurses, one of the sanitary personnel and one pathological technician were seropositive for HCV. Two nurses developed a chronic C hepatitis after a needlestick accident. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The hospital personnel is at risk for HCV infection. 2. The occupational risk of HCV infection increases with age but the risk is considerable lower than that of hepatitis B infection. 3. The occupational risk is highest among the workers of the chronic internal department, pathology and intensive care unit. 4. The nurses are at higher risk of HCV infection than the physicians. 5. The needlestick injury is associated with an increased risk for acquiring HCV infection.

Adult↗

Needlestick and sharps injuries among health-care workers in Taiwan.

Sharps injuries are a major cause of transmission of hepatitis B and C viruses and human immunodeficiency virus in health-care workers. To determine the yearly incidence and causes of sharps injuries in health-care workers in Taiwan, we conducted a questionnaire survey in a total of 8645 health care workers, including physicians, nurses, laboratory technicians, and cleaners, from teaching hospitals of various sizes. The reported incidence of needlestick and other sharps injuries was 1.30 and 1.21 per person in the past 12 months, respectively. Of most recent episodes of needlestick/sharps injury, 52.0% were caused by ordinary syringe needles, usually in the patient units. The most frequently reported circumstances of needlestick were recapping of needles, and those of sharps injuries were opening of ampoules/vials. Of needles which stuck the health-care workers, 54.8% had been used in patients, 8.2% of whom were known to have hepatitis B or C, syphilis, or human immunodeficiency virus infection. Sharps injuries in health-care workers in Taiwan occur more frequently than generally thought and risks of contracting blood-borne infectious diseases as a result are very high.

Accidents, Occupational↗

Studies examine OR injuries from sharps.

Needlesticks and cuts are common during surgery, exposing the surgical team to patients' blood. In some of these cases, patients might also be exposed to the worker's blood. New studies are shedding light on the frequency and type of exposures.

Accidents, Occupational↗

Reported needlestick and sharp injuries among health care workers in a Greek general hospital.

Between July 1990 and June 1996, 284 exposures to infectious material were reported by 247 health care workers (HCWs) at AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece, representing an overall rate of 2.4% reported injuries per 100 HCWs/year. Nurses reported the highest rates of incidents (3.0%) and in all but one working group women exhibited higher injury rates per year than male HCWs. Young workers (21-30 years old) were primarily affected in incidents (P < 0.001). Needles were the most common implement causing injury (60.6%) and resheathing of used needles as well as garbage collection were common causes of injury. None of the HCWs seroconverted in exposures where immune status to blood-borne pathogens was estimated. Efforts by the infection control committee need to be more intense, in order to increase the rate of reported staff injuries. This will facilitate identification of unsafe practices and provide more adequate preventive measures.

Accidents, Occupational↗