Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Laparoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly become the prime modality for removal of the gallbladder. However, as laparoscopic techniques for treating choledocholithiasis are evolving, we reviewed our experience with acute gallstone pancreatitis since the inception of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Between November 1989 and March 1993, we treated 57 patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy was performed during the initial admission in 46 patients (81%, group I), while 11 (19%) underwent delayed cholecystectomy at a second admission 2 to 9 weeks later (group II). Within group I, eight patients (17%) were thought to have contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underwent open cholecystectomy. In the remaining 38 patients of group I, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed successfully. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 23 of these patients (61%) and endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 6 patients (26%). In four other patients, the intraoperative cholangiogram revealed common bile duct stones that were removed using laparoscopic techniques. The 11 patients in group II were all treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy; of these patients, 3 underwent preoperative endoscopic stone removal and 1 had choledocholithiasis managed laparoscopically. Postoperative hospitalization averaged 4 +/- 1 days (mean +/- SEM), and there was no major morbidity or 30-day mortality. This is the first large series of acute gallstone pancreatitis in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our experience suggests that laparoscopic cholecystectomy with or without ERCP should be the primary approach for treating acute gallstone pancreatitis in the 1990s.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future.

Since its first described case in 1991, laparoscopic colon surgery has lagged behind minimally invasive surgical methods for solid intra-abdominal organs in terms of acceptability, dissemination, and ease of learning. In colon cancer, initial concerns over port site metastases and adequacy of oncologic resection have considerably dampened early enthusiasm for this procedure. Only recently, with the publication of several large, randomized controlled trials, has the incidence of port site metastases been shown to be equivalent to that of open resection. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has also been demonstrated to be at least equivalent to traditional laparotomy in terms of adequacy of oncologic resection, disease recurrence, and long-term survival. In addition, numerous reports have validated short-term benefits following laparoscopic resection for cancer, including shorter hospital stay, shorter time to recovery of bowel function, and decreased analgesic requirements, as well as other postoperative variables. In benign colonic disease, much less high-quality literature exists supporting the use of laparoscopic methods. Two recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated some short-term benefits to laparoscopic ileocolic resection for CD, in addition to evident cosmetic advantages. On the other hand, the current evidence on laparoscopic surgery for UC does not support its routine use among nonexpert surgeons outside of specialized centers. Laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease appears to provide several short-term benefits, although these advantages may not translate to cases of complicated diverticulitis. Despite the increasing acceptability of minimally invasive methods for the management of benign and malignant colonic pathologies, laparoscopic colon resection remains a prohibitively difficult technique to master. Numerous technological innovations have been introduced onto the market in an effort to decrease the steep learning curve associated with laparoscopic colon surgery. Good evidence exists supporting the use of second-generation, sleeveless, hand-assist devices in this context. Similarly, new hemostatic devices such as the ultrasonic scalpel and the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer may be particularly helpful for extensive colonic mobilizations, in which several vascular pedicles must be taken. The precise role of these hemostatic technologies has yet to be established, particularly in comparison with stapling devices and significantly cheaper laparoscopic clips. Finally, recent advances in camera systems are promising to improve the ease with which difficult colonic dissections can be performed.

Colon↗
PubMed2003

[Severe acute pancreatitis: role for laparoscopic surgery].

UNLABELLED: Minimally invasive surgery is a new and promising treatment modality in the management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Aim of our study was the evaluation of our first experiences with laparoscopic surgery in the management of patients with SAP. METHODS: A total of 65 patients complied with Atlanta recommendations for SAP and were included into this retrospective study. Indications for laparoscopic surgery were SAP presented with intraabdominal or retroperitoneal exudates and detected by ultrasound (US) and/or contrast enhanced computer tomography (CT) scan, and the presence of acute calculous cholecystitis when 3 to 5 days of conservative treatment did not show clinical improvement and surgical treatment was considered. Patients with improvement after initial therapy received conservative therapy only. Bacteriological cultures were done for abdominal exudates and necrotic tissue obtained during surgery. RESULTS: Totally, 39 patients were operated and 26 were treated conservatively only. Laparoscopic surgery was started in 31 patients and completed in 26 patients. The overall conversion rate was 16.1 %. Laparoscopic drainage of the intraabdominal exudate was done in 26 patients including drainage of the lesser sac in five of them. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 25 cases and laparoscopically assisted jejunostomy in 6 cases were performed as a part of the procedure. Conventional surgery was the primary procedure in 8 patients. Peripancreatic abscess formation was observed in one case one month after laparoscopic procedure and was cured with conventional surgical drainage. Bile leakage from the cystic stump was successfully treated with endoscopic papillotomy in one case. All patients survived after laparoscopic procedures. Overall complication rate was 7.7 % and mortality reached 3.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic drainage of the abdominal cavity, drainage of the lesser sac and revision of the retroperitoneal compartment can be safely carried out as an alternative to the conventional surgical approach. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and/or jejunostomy may be additionally performed if indicated.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Growing use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the national Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study: effects on volume, patient selection, and selected outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To study the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the 43 tertiary-care university-affiliated Veterans Administration medical centers (VAMCs) participating in the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study from October 1991 through December 1993. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies in the private sector have documented growth in the number of cholecystectomies and falling clinical thresholds for cholecystectomy with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: The following were analyzed for changes over time: measures of patient preoperative risk, complexity of surgery, severity of biliary disease, numbers of procedures, postoperative length of stay, and 30-day postoperative mortality and general complication rates. RESULTS: The number of cholecystectomies performed laparoscopically increased, but the total number of cholecystectomies performed remained stable over time. The proportion of patients with acute cholecystitis, emergent cholecystectomies, and technically complex cholecystectomies did not change or increased slightly over time. Adjusted odds for postoperative general complications were lower for laparoscopic than for open cholecystectomy, but 30-day postoperative mortality and general complication rates for all cholecystectomies remained constant over time. Postoperative length of stay for all cholecystectomies fell significantly. Implementation rates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy varied widely between hospitals. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was adopted more slowly and used in a lower percentage of cholecystectomies than in non-VA settings. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to non-VA studies showing increases in overall cholecystectomy volume since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, these VAMCs implemented laparoscopic cholecystectomy without growth in cholecystectomies or a change in the clinical threshold for cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with better outcomes, but its introduction in the setting of stable cholecystectomy volume and biliary disease case mix did not change postoperative mortality and complication rates. The stable cholecystectomy volume and biliary disease case mix, slower adoption, and lower use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy contrast with previous reports and may result from differences in patients and organization and financing of VA versus non-VA settings.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Retrospective comparison of outcome of 100 consecutive open cholecystectomies and 100 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

If laparoscopic cholecystectomy is to be a viable option for community surgeons and their patients, it should have a safety profile similar to or better than that of open cholecystectomy. Morbidity and mortality from 100 consecutive open cholecystectomies were compared to morbidity and mortality from 100 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies. All procedures were done at Davis Community Hospital (Statesville, NC, population 25,000). Open cholecystectomies were done by seven staff surgeons from July 1987 to March 1990. Laparoscopic cholecystectomies were done by three staff surgeons from February 1990 to August 1990. Cholangiography during open cholecystectomy was selective. After an initial learning experience of 11 cases, cholangiography was routine during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients having cholecystectomy coincidental to a planned common duct exploration for stones or neoplasia were excluded. For open cholecystectomy, morbidity was 13% and mortality, 2%. For laparoscopic cholecystectomy, morbidity was 9% and mortality, 1%. One death after open cholecystectomy was due to pulmonary embolus. The other two deaths in the series were due to underlying severe cardiopulmonary disease. Complications related directly to cholecystectomy were bleeding requiring transfusion (open 2, laparoscopic 1), bile leak (open 1, laparoscopic 1), wound infection (open 1), and prolonged back pain (laparoscopic 2). In two patients, the laparoscopic procedure was converted to open cholecystectomy. There were no common bile duct injuries in either group of patients. Results of this study suggest that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be done as safely as open cholecystectomy, even in smaller community hospitals.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

The plasma ACTH, AVP, CRH and catecholamine responses to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the responses of the stress hormones, cortisol, ACTH, vasopressin (AVP), corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) and catecholamines to elective conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: A right upper quadrant transverse incision was used for conventional cholecystectomy, and four 1-2-cm incisions for the laparoscopic procedure (for insertion of surgical instruments, diathermy, fibreoptic telescope and light source, and carbon dioxide insufflation). Blood was sampled immediately prior to premedication (temazepam), after induction of anaesthesia (fentanyl and thiopentone) and at 10-minute intervals until the end of the procedure (N2O maintenance, vecuronium relaxation). A blood sample was taken after reversal, and then at 10-minute intervals for 50 minutes. Plasma sodium and blood pressure were measured at similar intervals. Results are expressed as mean +/- standard error. PATIENTS: Twelve patients were studied (six in each group). MEASUREMENTS: Peptide hormones were measured by radioimmunoassay, cortisol by ELISA and catecholamines by HPLC. RESULTS: The mean premedication hormone values for the conventional and laparoscopic procedures did not increase significantly after induction of anaesthesia. Within 10 minutes of the first incision, however, there was a marked concordant rise in mean plasma ACTH and AVP levels for both procedures (conventional: ACTH, from a premedication value of 10.2 +/- 1.7 to 80.1 +/- 14.3 pmol/l, AVP from 1.2 +/- 0.4 to 117 +/- 24 pmol/l, P < 0.01 for both hormones; laparoscopic: ACTH from 5.8 +/- 2.6 to 55.1 +/- 26.0 pmol/l, AVP from 1.6 +/- 0.11 to 49.2 +/- 27.09 pmol/l). At the end of both types of operation mean levels of ACTH and AVP were still elevated, although the ACTH: AVP ratio had increased. Greater variability in ACTH and AVP responses was seen in the laparoscopic than in the conventional procedure, three patients showing a relatively small response to surgery. Total secretion of ACTH during both types of surgery was not significantly less both during (P < 0.05), and after (P < 0.01) laparoscopic surgery. For both procedures, the timing of AVP and ACTH peaks was significantly related (P < 0.002). A small but significant rise in CRH was observed 30 minutes after the start of surgery for both procedures P < 0.05). The timing of CRH and ACTH peaks was unrelated. The maximum mean plasma cortisol level for the conventional procedure (1268 +/- 147 nmol/l) was reached 20 minutes after reversal of anaesthesia and remained at this level until the end of sampling. The cortisol response was comparable during the laparoscopic procedure but was beginning to fall at 60 minutes post-operatively. Plasma adrenaline responses to the two types of surgery were not significantly different, but the plasma total noradrenaline response to laparoscopic surgery as indicated by the response area during the first 20 minutes was significantly increased (P < 0.02). Plasma sodium, renin activity and initial systolic blood pressure fall were not significantly different during the two procedures. CONCLUSIONS: For both procedures, the peak of ACTH secretion after incision is likely to be AVP dependent, and the timing of peak levels of these two hormones was significantly related. Subsequent ACTH secretion may be the result of an interaction between AVP and CRH. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in a smaller AVP rise than does the conventional procedure, and plasma AVP falls more rapidly post-operatively. During the period of observation, ACTH, CRH, cortisol and adrenaline responses were not significantly lessened by the laparoscopic approach, but there was a significant increase in the noradrenaline response. Stress hormone monitoring may assist further improvements in surgical technique.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1993

Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective analysis.

The potential advantages of laparoscopic surgery for a number of abdominal operations including appendicectomy have been heralded. In this study the aims were to assess prospectively the role of routine diagnostic laparoscopy in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and determine the efficacy of laparoscopic appendicectomy. Patients with suspected acute appendicitis had diagnostic laparoscopy. When the diagnosis was confirmed laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed. Where an alternative diagnosis was made the appropriate treatment was instituted. If no diagnosis could be made the macroscopically normal appendix was removed by laparoscopic appendicectomy. Eighty-one patients (50 female, 31 male) had an initial diagnostic laparoscopy; 53 had appendicitis and proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy. A diagnosis could not be established at diagnostic laparoscopy in six patients and they also proceeded to laparoscopic appendicectomy. An alternative diagnosis was made in the remaining 22 patients (19 female and 3 male), with five proceeding to laparotomy and one patient with mesenteric adenitis having laparoscopic appendicectomy. Seven patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy required conversion to an open operation due to a retrocaecal or perforated appendix. The median operating time for successful laparoscopic appendicectomy was 55 min (range 30-95). Morbidity occurred in five of 53 patients having a successful laparoscopic appendicectomy. The median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The median time before return to normal activities was 8 days. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a useful diagnostic technique in women with suspected acute appendicitis, as it improves diagnostic accuracy, reduces the negative appendicectomy rate and avoids unnecessary laparotomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred method of treatment for symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Since its introduction there has been an increase in postoperative diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to assess the indications and results of ERCP following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-one patients had an ERCP following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Two broad groups were identified: Group 1 (35 patients) had filling defects (consistent with stones) noted on operative cholangiography, which were not successfully flushed or extracted at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Group 2 consisted of patients who developed problems following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Nine patients had post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain with abnormal liver function tests (LFT), four of whom had common bile duct (CBD) injuries and three had CBD stones. Eleven patients had post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain with a normal diameter common bile duct on ultrasound and normal LFT; only one had a CBD stone. Five patients with a persisting bile leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy had an ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. In three the leak ceased, while two required subsequent open surgery to drain bile collections and ligate the cystic duct. One patient presented with an episode of transient jaundice but had a normal ERCP. There were six post-ERCP complications; three patients had mild pancreatitis, two had a minor haemorrhage and one an asymptomatic duodenal perforation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy was most valuable for the management of retained stones and the diagnosis and management of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain in association with abnormal LFT. The diagnostic yield was low (9%) when the LFT were normal.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Two uterine arterial management methods in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic separation with coagulation of the uterine arteries and uterosacral ligaments can be used in an attempt to improve the operative procedure when hysterectomy is carried out by laparoscopic and vaginal method. METHOD: A prospective study was carried out in 70 women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy excluding total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Laparoscopic uterine arterial separation with coagulation (include laparoscopic reperitonization) was performed after laparoscopic detachment of the bladder and resection of the broad ligament (or adnexa) in 39 cases (Group 1). Uterine artery was coagulated by bipolar electrocoagulator and separated from the uterine side wall by scissors. Endoloop tie was applied to the arterial pedicle, if bleeding occurred. Uterine arterial management was performed through the vaginal route (include vaginal reperitonization) after laparoscopic procedure which was finished at the lower part of broad ligament with bladder detachment in 31 cases (Group 2). RESULTS: The average duration of operation was 84.0 min and 101.8 min in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.05). The average amount of bleeding was 154.8 ml and 298.4 ml in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.05). Hemoglobin decreased in average by 0.9 g/100 ml and 1.6 g/100 ml in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that laparoscopic management of uterine arterial pedicles after bladder detachment could reduce the duration of operation time and amount of bleeding in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Laparoscopic gastrointestinal and gallbladder surgery: will the promise be fulfilled?

The results of the first 181 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 12 patients who underwent laparoscopic colon resection in our hospital are described. Our results show that laparoscopic cholecystectomy has proved to be the standard surgical procedure for treating gallbladder disease. The place of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of other abdominal diseases is less clear. Our results in laparoscopic colon surgery indicate that a laparoscopic approach in segmental colon resection is feasible. The operation time is long, however, expressing the long learning curve for the operating team, as well as the technical difficulties encountered with this minimal invasive method. On the other hand, it has been proved that large abdominal operations can be performed via the laparoscope. By improving the laparoscopic instruments and increasing the laparoscopic surgeon's experience, further application of this method in gastrointestinal surgery may be expected. Surgeons should, however, be aware of the long learning curve involved in advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in New York State: mortality, complications, and choice of procedure.

BACKGROUND: With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patient outcomes and choice of procedure (laparoscopic vs open) are of vital interest. The purpose of this study was to examine the mortality and complication rates for patients undergoing laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in New York State and to test for differences among hospital peer groups and regions of the state in the tendency to use the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy was conducted in which data were analyzed on all 30,968 patients who underwent cholecystectomy as a principal procedure in New York State in 1996. RESULTS: A total of 78.7% of the 30,968 patients who underwent cholecystectomy as a principal procedure in New York State in 1996 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The mortality rate was lower for laparoscopic cholecystectomy than for the open procedure (0.23% vs 1.90%, P < .0001) and remained significantly lower after patient characteristics related to patient survival (odds ratio 0.34, P < .0001) were controlled for. The prevalence rate of the 8 most common complications among cholecystectomy patients was also much lower among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy in public hospitals, Bronx County, and Kings County were found to be significantly less likely to have laparoscopic procedures, and patients undergoing cholecystectomy on Long Island were found to be significantly more likely to have laparoscopic procedures than were other patients in the state. CONCLUSIONS: There are reasonably large differences among hospitals, hospital groups, and regions of the state in the type of cholecystectomy used, even after adjustment for differences in patient comorbidities and indications for type of procedure.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Initial experience with day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a tertiary care hospital in India.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is one of the commonest general surgical operations. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently the most favoured approach. As it is associated with less postoperative pain and ileus, it allows early discharge of patients from the hospital. Studies from the West have reported that 'day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy' is feasible and safe. In India, the current practice is to admit patients for laparoscopic cholecystectomy 24-48 hours prior to surgery and to discharge most patients within one to two days of surgery. There is no report from any Indian centre describing 'day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy'. We conducted a prospective study to assess the feasibility, safety and patients' acceptance of 'day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy' in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, aged less than 65 years with ASA grade I and II, were offered day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Seventy-four patients consented to be included in the study. The nature of operation and likely postoperative course were explained in detail to the patients. Conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in all patients. The main outcome measures assessed were successful management of patients on day case basis and its acceptance by the patients. RESULTS: Sixty-eight (92%) patients underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Fifty-five of these (81%) were successfully managed as day case procedures. There were no major complications. Three of the 55 patients (5.4%) needed re-admission and could be managed conservatively. Fifty-three (96%) patients described their experience as 'pleasant'. None of them described their experience to be 'unpleasant' or 'bad'. Fifty-four (98%) patients stated that they would recommend day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy to close friends and relatives. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible in a developing country.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Veterans Affairs health care system, 1991-1995.

CONTEXT: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the most widely used treatment for gallbladder disease. In HMO, Medicare, and fee-for-service settings, cholecystectomy rates increased 28% to 59% after introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on cholecystectomy rates and the operative mortality rate in Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. DESIGN: Sequential cross-sectional study. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent cholecystectomy from 1991 (before introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy) to 1995. SETTING: 133 VA hospitals. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cholecystectomy rates, use of laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy, and operative mortality rate. RESULTS: The annual number of cholecystectomies in the VA system increased by 10% from 1991 to 1995; the laparoscopic procedure accounted for 25% of the caseload in 1992 and 52% in 1995. Compared with patients having laparoscopic cholecystectomy, those having open cholecystectomy were more likely to be older, be male, and have acute cholecystitis or comorbid illnesses (P < 0.001). The operative mortality rate of open cholecystectomy increased by 46% during this 4-year period (from 2.4% to 3.4%) and was constant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (about 0.5%). Given the increasing use of the laparoscopic procedure, however, the overall mortality rate of cholecystectomy during surgery decreased by 22% (from 2.4% to 1.8%). Despite increased use of the surgery, the absolute number of deaths decreased by 9%. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the VA system was not accompanied by a large increase in cholecystectomy rates, as it was in fee-for-service, Medicare, and HMO systems. Because the rate of operations has changed only slightly, the total number of cholecystectomy-related deaths has decreased.

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Guidelines to laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis.

OBJECTIVE: The present work aims at identifying preoperative variables that may help the surgeon choosing the most appropriate operative approach in various clinical presentation of acute cholecystitis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Conversion rates up to 60% have been reported for laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Previous works indicate that the severity of the gallbladder inflammatory process represents the main cause of laparoscopic conversion. The influence of converting a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis to open surgery on the post-operative course remains questionable. Objective preoperative variables correlated to the severity of cholecystitis and predictive of laparoscopic cholecystectomy failure remain to be identified. METHODS: Seven preoperative and five post-operative variables were compared among a continuous series of 62 patients operated for acute cholecystitis either by a successful laparoscopic procedure (37 patients) or by a laparoscopic procedure converted to open surgery (14 patients) or directly by open surgery (11 patients). The post-operative outcome of patients in the 3 groups were compared. Determinant preoperative factors correlated with the need to convert a laparoscopic procedure were searched by the CHI square test for independance and by a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Converting a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis to open surgery does not worsen the patients early post-operative course as long as conversion is decided rapidly and before peroperative complications arise. Three preoperative independent variables predictive of the need to convert a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were identified: The thickness of the gallbladder wall, preoperative C reactive protein seric levels and finally the delay between the start of acute symptoms of cholecystitis and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The post-operative outcome of patients operated for acute cholecystitis depends more on the severity of the disease than on the type of the surgical procedure. Patients with a perforated cholecystitis (grade III) should better be handled immediately by open surgery. Patients with acute edematous cholecystitis (grade I) or with empyema or gangrenous cholecystitis (grade II) coming early to surgery (within 72 hrs) and having seric preoperative CRP levels less than 10 mg/% represent the best candidates to laparoscopic surgery.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: evaluation of different techniques.

Patients and surgeons frequently opt for laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. Clinical studies have shown this approach to be a reasonable alternative to open appendectomy. The objective of the current study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy using three different techniques. The study sample consisted of 150 children with acute appendicitis who underwent surgery at Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt, and at Al Mishary Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between October 1997 and October 1999. The patients were allocated to undergo extracorporeal laparoscopic appendectomy, Endoloop laparoscopic appendectomy, or EndoGIA (Ethicon Endo-surgery, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) laparoscopic appendectomy. All patients were assessed for the severity of the disease at baseline using clinical and hematologic indicators. The ages of the children ranged from 7 to 14 years, with a mean of 10 years (SD, 2.14 years). Of the children, 55.3% were female. The results showed that children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy using the EndoGIA had statistically significant shorter operating times, did not have complications, and had the shortest duration of hospital stay (although duration of hospital stay did not reach the statistically significant level of P > 0.05). Therefore, the study showed that laparoscopic appendectomy using the EndoGIA is the procedure that is most recommended, except for the relatively high cost of the disposable materials. Endoloop laparoscopic technique was the second most preferable procedure, and the least preferred procedure was extracorporeal laparoscopically assisted appendectomy. The major drawback of the last technique is the high frequency of complications. Endoloop laparoscopic appendectomy with a purse-string suture can be performed safely if the EndoGIA is not available.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

The introduction of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has occurred in several surgical specialties. It allows the laparoscopic surgeon to insert a hand into the peritoneal cavity, through a small incision, while maintaining pneumoperitoneum. This technique has been made possible through the engineering of several unique devices. By returning the hand to the peritoneal cavity, the surgeon is allowed the return of tactile sensation, atraumatic retraction, blunt dissection, and digital vascular control. Proper device placement is mandatory. The principles include port-site triangulation, conversion to a convenient open incision if necessary, location away from bony prominences, and placement to minimize hand fatigue. Application and advantages of HALS can be shown in several procedures; specifically, laparoscopic splenectomy in cases of splenomegaly, laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy, and laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. Its use in these procedures does not appear to be detrimental to the benefits associated with a completely laparoscopic technique, and may offer advantages. It may alter the learning curve regarding advanced laparoscopic procedures for the neophyte laparoscopic surgeon, and allow them to perform operations they otherwise would not attempt. For the experienced laparoscopic surgeon, it may allow them to complete operations laparoscopically they might otherwise have to convert. In time, HALS may have a larger role in many advanced surgical procedures.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2004

Endoscopic transaxillary thyroid lobectomy: flexible vs rigid laparoscope.

BACKGROUND: The use of the endoscopic procedure for thyroid lobectomy in benign solitary thyroid nodule has been developed rapidly and increasingly refined in recent years. The early results are technically feasible, safe and mainly provide promising cosmetic results, some show a quicker recovery. The authors wanted to know if this procedure can be performed via rigid laparoscope which is simple, less expensive and widely available in many surgical centers. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate operative time, blood loss, complication of flexible compared to 30 degrees rigid laparoscope in endoscopic transaxillary thyroid lobectomy for solitary thyroid nodule. METHOD: From February 2004 to June 2004, 13 cases of benign solitary thyroid nodule underwent the endoscopic transaxillary thyroid lobectomy. Flexible laparoscope techniques were performed in 9 cases and 30 degrees rigid laparoscope in the other 4 cases. Port site, number of ports and dissected method were the same in both procedures by the same surgeon. Operative time, blood loss, post-operative results were measured for evaluation. RESULTS: From 13 cases, 9 in the flexible laparoscope group and 4 in the rigid laparoscope group. All but one in the flexible group with torn internal jugular vein were successful. The mean operation time was 165.42 +/- 35.06 minutes, which was 175.63 +/- 35.70 minutes for flexible laparoscope group and 145 +/- 26.45 minutes for rigid laparoscope group. There was no recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and no subcutaneous emphysema. The patients were satisfied with the cosmetic results. CONCLUSION: On the basis of early experience with these 13 patients, the authors believe that endoscopic thyroidectomy using the rigid laparoscope has proved to be no different in the intra-operative results, so the authors do aimed to show that with the rigid laparoscope which is available in many surgical centers, less expensive and easy in maintenance will provide another surgical option for treatment of thyroid nodule, with maximized cosmetic effect.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

[Laparoscopic ultrasonography. A review and authors' own experiences].

Laparoscopic ultrasound scanning has long been available, but interest in and reports of the technique have until the last few years been sporadic. The rapid development and growing interest in laparoscopic surgery as well as the advent of commercially available systems designed for laparoscopic ultrasound have resulted in renewed interest in the technique. The available published reports lack prospective, controlled clinical studies with respect to where and when laparoscopic ultrasound would be indicated. A favourable picture is given as concerns the use of laparoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and evaluation of primary liver and pancreas tumours as well as liver metastases. Laparoscopic ultrasound is also mentioned as a reliable alternative to cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our own preliminary experiences with two laparoscopic ultrasound systems and a simple system using an ultrasound finger-probe are described. A laparoscopic ultrasound scanning system consisting of a stiff instrument with a convex (linear) transducer mounted on a flexible support and with the possibility of ultrasound-guided biopsy and colour-Doppler seems optimal. Prospective studies are being carried out to identify areas of utilization and limitations of laparoscopic ultrasound.

Biliary Tract Neoplasms↗