Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “INSECTS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources

Microflora of soils under pine forests area affected by gradation of leaf-eating insects.

Soils of pine forests in the Bytnica Forestry District, Poland, are poor in nutrients readily accessible to plants. The excessively acidic reaction of the soils, typical for soils under pine forests, unfavourably affects the growth of microorganisms whose numbers are lower than in soils under deciduous and mixed forests. In the pine forests of the studied forestry there were outbreaks of a defoliating insect - pine beauty moth (Panolis flammea L.), which resulted in over 60% defoliation of the trees. The studies were carried out on the area of tree stands subjected to gradation by leaf-eating insects (sprayed and not sprayed) and healthy stand of the same age class (age 60 to 70 years). The studies revealed increased number of soil microorganisms in samples taken from the area affected by pine beauty moth gradation in the case of both unsprayed areas and those sprayed with the pesticide. The occurrence in these soils of larger numbers of ammonifying and denitrifying bacteria points to the presence of conditions favouring the growth of heterotrophic organisms. Changes in the number of actinomycetes and fungi in soils under tree stands subjected to gradation by insects, compared to healthy stands, can be a consequence of a change of environmental conditions (e.g. % content of organic carbon). Soils under defoliated tree stands show higher biochemical activity related to nitrogen cycling in the pine forest ecosystem. This leads to higher availability of organic nitrogen for conversion to inorganic forms of nitrogen, which are utilised by trees. Further changes occurring in soils under forest stands affected by gradation by leaf-eating insects would allow to gain knowledge on the ecological consequences of the use of insecticides in the protection of pine stands against harmful insects, with particular stress on those situations in which pine stands not threatened by complete defoliation are sprayed.

Actinobacteria↗

Spinosad, a new tool for insect control in vegetables cultivated in greenhouses.

Spinosad is a biological insecticide derived as a fermentation product from the soil actinomycete Saccharopolyspora spinosa. The compound was tested for its possible use in northwestern Europe in vegetables cultivated in greenhouses. Spinosad is an insect control agent that has activity against a wide range of insect pests including caterpillars, leafminers and thrips. Because of its selectivity on a large number of beneficials used in greenhouses, spinosad is an interesting tool for insect control. A SC formulated product, containing 480 g a.i. litre-1, was tested in 1998, 1999 and 2000 in a range of trials at the research stations of Naaldwijk/Netherlands, and Gembloux/Belgium. This paper reviews and discusses the efficacy results on Trialeurodes vaporarium, Frankliniella occidentalis, Chrysodeixis Chalcites, Liriomyza Bryoniae. According the target insect rates from 4.8 till 36 g a.i./hl were tested. Consistent performance was recorded on F. occidentalis at rates of 9.6 g a.i./hl or above. Interesting efficacy results were recorded on the other above-mentioned insects.

Animals↗

Reactions to insect allergens. The incidence of response to testing among allergic and nonallergic persons.

Positive reactions to skin tests with extracts of various insects were found to be significantly higher in 200 patients with allergic disease than in 150 nonallergic controls.Forty-seven per cent of the allergic group had positive reaction to bee, 46 per cent to house fly, 39.5 per cent to moth, 29.5 to ant and 28.5 to aphid. Ant and house fly extract caused the greatest number of severe reactions (4+), with moth second and bee third. Because extracts of nonstinging insects caused reaction almost as often and as strong as stinging insects, it may be inferred that sensitization is due to inhaled insect particles. There appeared to be no necessary connection between a history of having been stung and a strong skin test reaction to bee protein. Testing for insect sensitivity appears a good way to get diagnostic information that can enhance the effectiveness of treatment.

Allergens↗

Insects as allergen injectants, severe reactions to bites and stings of arthropods.

Arthropods capable of penetrating human skin often cause severe local and systemic reactions. Local reactions suggest delayed hypersensitivity while systemic symptoms resemble more the anaphylactic shock in animals. The nature of the antigen remains obscure but predominant evidence suggests its presence throughout the entire organism. Positive history of hypersensitivity to insect injectants was obtained in approximately 20 per cent of persons in the course of routine interviews of 1,078 patients. Repeated bites and stings at long or irregular intervals often induce a state of hypersensitivity, while repeated regular injections of extracts of these insects at shorter intervals may greatly reduce the hypersensitivity. The clinical evidence of allergic sensitivity to insect bites and stings cannot be readily confirmed by skin testing or by other immunological procedures. The history and the character of the lesions as well as certain entomological knowledge of the habits of the insects offer a better basis for specific diagnosis. Treatment with extracts of the whole offending insect generally provides good results but the protection afforded by such treatment varies in degree and duration.

Allergens↗

Purification and characterization of P47gag-crk expressed in insect cells.

The crk oncogene product, P47gag-crk, was expressed and purified using a baculovirus expression system. Approximately 2-10 mg of P47gag-crk was produced in 10(9) insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus. Partially purified P47gag-crk was obtained by precipitation in a low salt buffer and gel filtration. A better purification of P47gag-crk was achieved by immunoaffinity chromatography, resulting in a single band by Coomassie Blue staining. The insect cells expressing P47gag-crk showed an increase in protein-phosphotyrosine content, which is a characteristic feature of crk-transformed cells. Moreover, like P47gag-crk produced in chicken or rat cells, P47gag-crk produced in insect cells associated in vitro with a tyrosine kinase and its substrates from Crk-3Y1 cells. Peptide mapping of P47gag-crk expressed in insect, rat, and chicken cells showed that similar sites were phosphorylated in these proteins. These data suggest that P47gag-crk expressed in insect cells is functional and will be useful for the further analysis of this protein.

Animals↗

Stinging insect allergy.

One to two million Americans have a history of systemic allergic reactions to stinging insects and must live with the knowledge that future stings could be catastrophic. Recent advances have been made in diagnosis and treatment of this problem. Pure venoms have been recognized to be superior to the whole body extract as diagnostic and treatment antigens. Use of pure venoms for immunotherapy gives far better protection than whole body extract for the allergic patient and represents a major advance in the field of allergy. The imported fire ant is very different from the other common stinging insects in its venom components, the type of local reactions caused by its sting, and the fact that whole body extract from this insect seems to be as good an antigen for diagnosis and treatment as pure venom. Although important discoveries about insect allergy have been made recently, some very important questions are yet to be answered. Among these are: (1) Can suppliers of venom provide us with enough venom to treat all patients with insect allergy? (2) How long should immunotherapy be continued? and (3) Would treatment with specific antigens from venom be superior to using whole venom? We all await the answer to these and other questions with hopeful anticipation.

Anaphylaxis↗

[Self-administration of adrenaline aerosol in anaphylactic reactions after insect stings].

A serious allergic reaction after an insect sting is wellknown source for concern and anxiety. Patients with known hypersensitivity to insect stings are usually equipped with an adrenaline self-injection kit by an allergologist. In Denmark a new device for self-medication of adrenaline was approved in 1994, the adrenaline aerosol spray, Adrenalin Medihaler. The article is based on former studies and experiences, related to the usage of an adrenaline aerosol spray for the treatment of anaphylactic reactions after an insect sting. We conclude that adrenaline aerosol treatment should play an important role as emergency treatment for anaphylactic reactions after insect stings, and in most cases can replace the use of adrenalin self-injection kits. Adrenaline aerosol self-treatment could have an important beneficial effect helping to avoid exacerbation of the initial symptoms after insect venom exposition, such as bronchial obstruction and laryngeal oedema.

Aerosols↗

Risk factors associated with the severity of systemic insect sting reactions.

To evaluate risk factors associated with the severity of systemic insect sting reaction and to determine the type of insect responsible for systemic anaphylaxis, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 498 patients undergoing venom immunotherapy for insect sting reaction in 13 allergy clinics in Israel. Data were collected by questionnaire and review of patient records. Eighty percent of the patients were treated with honeybee venom, which was used as a single therapy in 60% of the group. In a multivariate logistic model the major factors identified as significantly influencing the probability of a more severe systemic reaction were short time of onset of reaction after stinging (<30 min), high number of prior stings (> or = 4), and age (> or = 18 years). A total of 79.3% of the patients had been stung outdoors, and 50% had lived all their lives in rural areas as compared to 10% in the general Israeli population. This study reports clinically valuable risk factors for the severity of systemic sting reaction. A practical finding was that the honeybee is the insect mostly responsible for sting reactions in Israel, but the type of insect is not a significant predictor of the severity of the reaction.

Adolescent↗

[Preliminary evaluation of the incidence and control of insects--pest control in Polish hospitals].

The evaluation of the infestation and methods of insect disease vectors control in 748 hospitals in Poland in the period of 1990 to 1995 were done. The insect species, places of their occurrence and control agents were analysed. Blattella germanica L. occurred most frequently (71% hospitals). Blatta orientalis and Monomorium pharaonis were found in 40% and 17% hospitals respectively. Kitchens, laundries and baths were most infested. Sometimes insects were found also in central sterilization units and operating theaters. Controls of insects in hospitals were performed one to four times a year mostly by spraying with residual formulation. The control agents contained pyrethroids (mostly permethrin, but also deltamethrin and cypermethrin) and carbamates (bendiocarb, propoxur). Baits with hydramethylnon, boric acid, methoprene and chlorpyrifos were used not very often. The authors suggest reduction in using the spraying agents. The baits are recommended because they delay the development of the resistance to pesticides in controlling insect populations and are safer.

Animals↗

Common origin of arthropod tyrosinase, arthropod hemocyanin, insect hexamerin, and dipteran arylphorin receptor.

Dipteran arylphorin receptors, insect hexamerins, cheliceratan and crustacean hemocyanins, and crustacean and insect tyrosinases display significant sequence similarities. We have undertaken a systematic comparison of primary and secondary structures of these proteins. On the basis of multiple sequence alignments the phylogeny of these proteins was investigated. Hexamerin subunits, hemocyanin subunits, and tyrosinases share extensive similarities throughout the entire amino acid sequence. Our studies suggest the origin of arthropod hemocyanins from ancient tyrosinase-like proteins. Insect hexamerins likely evolved from hemocyanins of ancient crustaceans, supporting the proposed sister-group position of these subphyla. Arylphorin receptors, responsible for incorporation of hexamerins into the larval fat body of diptera, are related to hexamerins, hemocyanins, and tyrosinase. The receptor sequences display extensive similarities to the first and third domains of hemocyanins and hexamerins. In the middle region only limited amino acid conservation was observed. Elements important for hexamer formation are deleted in the receptors. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that dipteran arylphorin receptors diverged from ancient hexamerins, probably early in insect evolution.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

[Protection against insects].

Successful protection against haematophagous insects and ticks, especially in areas where transmission of diseases occurs, requires a consistent application of a combination of appropriate measures. However, this can never substitute a chemoprophylaxis. Which measures have to be used depends on the circumstances under which they have to work. Indoor, physical means such as mosquito-screens on doors and windows, air-conditioners, and bed nets can be used to keep the insects away. These measures can be supplemented or supported by insecticides used as knock-down sprays, by electrical evaporation or for the treatment of screens and bed nets. In the field, if it is not possible to avoid mosquito-areas during phases of activity, appropriate clothing and repellents must provide the protection. Bright, wide pants and shirts of dense weaving covering as much skin as bearable should be preferred. Repellents are sprays, lotions, milks or creams which are evenly applied to the skin to prevent insects from biting. They contain synthetic or natural active substances of substantially varying effectiveness. The gold standard since about 60 years is diethylbenzamine (DEET). There are a few other active substances with a lower risk of side effects, however, combined with a lower effectiveness mainly on people with a high attractiveness for mosquitoes. Products containing an extract of Eucalyptus citriodora provide the best protection amongst those with natural active substances. Wearing bracelets or necklaces treated with repellents, acoustic devices (buzzers), electrocuters, topical or systemic Vitamin B1 or eating garlic are useless measures to prevent insects from biting.

Animals↗

[Individual protection against insect vectors].

Many diseases for which no vaccine is available are transmitted by insect and arthropod vectors, the main exceptions being yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis B. Treatment is less and less effective due to the development of chemoresistance to therapeutic and prophylactic drugs as is well-illustrated by malaria. One of the best methods of preventing these diseases is personal protection against insect bites. Personal protection measures can be divided into three categories which can be used separately or in combination : application of repellents to the skin, wearing clothes impregnated with insecticides, and use of bed nets and other barriers impregnated with insecticides. The choice of method depends on the type of insect vector involved. For insects that are active during the day or at dusk, application of repellents to the skin gives good short-term protection and wearing impregnated clothes is useful. Bed nets that have been properly impregnated with pyrethroids are highly effective for night-time protection. Since personal protection methods are not 100% effective, they must be used in association with chemoprophylaxis according to medical guidelines. Medical advice should be sought if fever should occur especially after returning from a trip in the tropics.

Animals↗

Increases in cyclic 3', 5'-guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) occur at ecdysis in an evolutionarily conserved crustacean cardioactive peptide-immunoreactive insect neuronal network.

At the end of each instar, insects shed their old cuticle by performing the stereotyped ecdysis behavior. In the month, Manduca sexta, larval ecdysis is accompanied by increases in intracellular cyclic 3', 5'-guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in a small network of 50 peptidergic neurons within the ventral central nervous system (CNS). Studies on a variety of insects show that this cGMP response has been associated with ecdysis throughout most of insect evolution. In the mealbeetle (Tenebrio, Coleoptera) and the mosquito (Aedes, Diptera), all 50 neurons showed increases in cGMP immunoreactivity (-IR) at ecdysis, and all were immunopositive for crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP). Other insects varied with respect to their cGMP response at ecdysis and their CCAP-IR. In more primitive insects, such as the silverfish (Ctenolepisma, Zygentoma) and the grasshopper (Locusta, Orthoptera), an abdominal subset of these neurons did not show detectable cGMP-IR at ecdysis, although the neurons were CCAP-IR. Conversely, whereas CCAP-IR was severely reduced in the thoracic and subesophageal neurons of Lepidoptera larvae and may be absent in a subset of the corresponding abdominal neurons in crickets (Gryllus, Orthoptera), the ecdysial cGMP response occurred in all 50 neurons. The most extreme case was found in cyclorrhaphous flies, in which most of the 50 neurons were CCAP-IR, although none showed increases in cGMP at ecdysis. This situation in higher Diptera is discussed in terms of their highly modified ecdysis behaviors.

Animals↗

Neurobiology of the gustatory systems of Drosophila and some terrestrial insects.

Insects have been favorites for the study of taste perception in the last few decades. They have been used for anatomical, behavioral, developmental, genetic, and physiological studies related to gustation and feeding response. Several genes known to affect the formation of gustatory sensilla or alter the feeding behavior of insects such as Drosophila are known. Studies related to signal transduction, coding of gustatory information, and the nature and constitution of genes involved in taste perception have also been taken up with insects in recent years. The understanding of basic mechanisms of taste perception in insects is likely to lead to better management of useful as well as harmful insects.

Animals↗

Histamine in the brain of insects: a review.

Histamine is the neurotransmitter of photoreceptors in insects and other arthropods. As a photoreceptor transmitter, histamine acts on ligand-gated chloride channels. Another type of histamine receptor has been indicated in the insect central nervous system by binding pharmacology. This receptor is similar to the mammalian H1 receptors, which are G-protein coupled and thus utilize a second messenger system. The distribution of histamine-immunoreactive (HAIR) neurons has been studied in a few insect species: cockroaches, locust, crickets, honey bee, blowflies, and in Drosophila. In addition to its presence in photoreceptor cells, histamine is distributed in a rather small number of neurons in the insect brain. Many of these neurons have extensive bilateral arborizations that innervate several distinct neuropil regions, notably in the protocerebrum. Some patterns of histamine distribution are seen in all the species. On the other hand, the number and morphology of neurons differ between the studied species, and several major neuropils (central body, antennal lobes, mushroom bodies) are supplied by HAIR neurons in some species, but not in others. Thus it appears that there are some species-specific functions of histamine and on others that are preserved between species. Some of the histaminergic neurons may constitute wide field inhibitory systems with functions distinct from those of neurons containing gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA). Novel data are presented for Drosophila and the cockroach Leucophaea maderae and a comparison is made with published data on other insects.

Animals↗

Genetics and evolution of insect resistance in Arabidopsis.

The genetic and molecular tools available in Arabidopsis allow identification of insect resistance genes. Many functional aspects of pest recognition and signal transduction are conserved in the defensive physiology of a broad range of plant species. Therefore, studies of insect resistance in Arabidopsis may be extended to functional genomics studies in many plant species of agricultural and ecological importance. Because of public concerns for field release of genetically modified organisms, naturally occurring genetic variation for resistance to insect herbivores will be valuable in plant breeding. Combined studies employing QTL mapping and candidate resistance genes are necessary to find and understand the genes responsible for variation in resistance. We review experiments showing that plant populations contain high levels of genetic variation for defensive physiology and disease and insect resistance, and that this variation can be manipulated to alter resistance and its components in a predictable fashion. In Arabidopsis, we can map the genes controlling physiological variation, and estimate the importance of regulatory or enzyme-encoding loci. Finally, we review functional genomics approaches for identification of insect resistance genes in Arabidopsis.

Animals↗

Gonadotropins in insects: an overview.

Control of gonad development in insects requires juvenile hormone, ecdysteroids, and a peptidic brain gonadotropin(s). Compared to vertebrates, the situation in insects with respect to the molecular structure of gonadotropins is far less uniform. Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) of vertebrates are glycoproteins that are synthezised in the hypothalamus and released from the anterior pituitary. They stimulate gonad development, the production of progesterone or of sex steroids (estrogens, androgens). None of the known insect gonadotropins is a glycoprotein, neither can they be grouped into a single peptide family. In Drosophila, two G-protein coupled receptors, structurally related to the mammalian glycoprotein hormone receptors, have been identified. Nothing is known about their natural ligands. The sex-steroids of insects are likely to be ecdysteroids (20E in females, E in males of some species). Some of the identified gonadotropins speed up vitellogenesis (locust OMP and some -PF/-RFamide peptides) or stimulate ecdysteroid production by the ovaries (locust-OMP and Aedes- OEH) or testis (testis ecdysiotropin of Lymantria). In flies, the only as yet identified gonadotropin is the cAMP-generating peptide of Neobellieria. The seeming absence of uniformity in gonadotropins in insects might be due to a multitude of factors that can stimulate ecdysteroid production and/or to the use of different bioassays. Arch.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

An insect model for assessing oxidative stress related to arsenic toxicity.

The potential usefulness of an insect model to evaluate oxidative stress induced by environmental pollutants was examined with trivalent arsenic (As3+, NaAsO2) and pentavalent arsenic (As5+, Na2HAsO4) in adult female house flies, Musca domestica, and fourth-instar cabbage loopers, Trichoplusia ni. M. domestica was highly susceptible to both forms of arsenic following 48 h exposure in the drinking water with LC50s of 0.008 and 0.011% w/v for As3+ and As5+, respectively. T. ni larvae were susceptible to dietary As3+ with an LC50 of 0.032% w/w but seem to tolerate As5+ well with an LC50 of 0.794% concentration after 48 h exposure. The minimally acute LC5 dose of both As3+ and As5+ varied considerably but averaged 0.005% for both insects. The potential of both valencies of arsenic for inducing oxidative stress in the insects exposed ad libitum to approximately LC5 levels was assessed. The parameters examined were the alterations of the antioxidant enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione transferase (GST), the peroxidase activity of glutathione transferase (GSTPX), and glutathione reductase (GR), and increases in lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation. SOD (1.3-fold), GST (1.6-fold), and GR (1.5-fold) were induced by As3+ in M. domestica but CAT and GSTPX were not affected. As5+ had no effect on M. domestica. In T. ni, the antioxidant enzyme activities were not affected by As3+ except for SOD which was suppressed by 29.4% and GST which was induced by 1.4-fold. As5+ had no effect except the suppression of SOD by 41.2%. Lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation, which represent stronger indices of oxidative stress, were elevated in both insects by up to 2.9-fold. However, based on the antioxidant enzyme response to the arsenic anions, the mode of action of arsenic induced oxidative stress may differ between the two insects. Until this aspect is further clarified, evidence at this time favors the prospect of As3+ as a pro-oxidant, especially for M. domestica.

Animals↗