Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GPCR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

A fluorescent reporter assay for the detection of ligands acting through Gi protein-coupled receptors.

Accompanying the advances in basic biology of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the practical need among biopharmaceutical companies for sensitive assays to assess GPCR function, particularly formats that are compatible with high-throughput drug screening. Here we describe a novel cell-based assay format for the high-throughput detection of ligands for Gi protein-coupled receptors. Two Gi-GPCRs, mu-opioid receptor (mu-OPR) and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor la (5HT1aR) are employed as model receptor targets. The key feature of this assay system is the isolation of stable, clonal Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines that carry three separate expression plasmids: (1) a chimeric Gq/i5 protein (which re-directs a negative Gi-type signal to a positive Gq-type response), (2) a given Gi-GPCR, and (3) a beta-lactamase (beta1a) reporter gene responsive to Gi-GPCR signaling. Cell-based assays built using this format show appropriate rank order of potency among a reference set of receptor agonist and antagonist compounds. Such assays are also robust, reliable, and can be used for industrial-scale applications such as high-throughput screening for drug leads.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Mechanisms of regulation and function of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases.

G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) interact with the agonist-activated form of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) to affect receptor phosphorylation and to initiate profound impairment of receptor signaling, or desensitization. GPCR forms the largest family of cell surface receptors, and defects in GRK function have the potential consequence to affect GPCR-stimulated biological responses in many pathological situations.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Many modulators of inflammation, including chemokines, neuropeptides, and neurotransmitters signal via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). GPCR kinases (GRK) can phosphorylate agonist-activated GPCR thereby promoting receptor desensitization. Here we describe that in leukocytes from patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) or with secondary progressive MS, GRK2 levels are significantly reduced. Unexpectedly, cells from patients during remission express even lower levels of GRK2. The level of GRK2 in leukocytes of patients after stroke, a neurological disorder with paralysis but without an autoimmune component, was similar to GRK2 levels in cells from healthy individuals. In addition, we demonstrate that the course of recombinant myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (1-125)-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model for MS, is markedly different in GRK2(+/-) mice that express 50% of the GRK2 protein in comparison with wild-type mice. Onset of EAE was significantly advanced by 5 days in GRK2(+/-) mice. The earlier onset of EAE was associated with increased early infiltration of the CNS by T cells and macrophages. Although disease scores in the first phase of EAE were similar in both groups, GRK2(+/-) animals did not develop relapses, whereas wild-type animals did. The absence of relapses in GRK2(+/-) mice was associated with a marked reduction in inflammatory infiltrates in the CNS. Recombinant myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced T cell proliferation and cytokine production were normal in GRK2(+/-) animals. We conclude that down-regulation of GRK2 expression may have important consequences for the onset and progression of MS.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

[Mechanism for activation of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor induced by stimuli].

Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor(HB-EGF), which belongs to the EGF family, is a critical growth factor for a number of physiological and pathological processes, such as wound healing and cardiac hypertrophy. HB-EGF is synthesized as a membrane-anchored form(pro-HB-EGF), and pro-HB-EGF is cleaved at the cell surface to yield soluble HB-EGF by a mechanism called "ectodomain shedding". Soluble HB-EGF has mitogenic activity. Ectodomain shedding of proHB-EGF is induced by stimuli, including 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate(TPA), a ligand for seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors(GPCR), stress and inflammatory cytokine. Lysophosphatidic acid(LPA), a ligand for GPCR, stimulates the shedding of proHB-EGF, which constitutes a GPCR-mediated transactivation of the EGF receptor. Ras-Raf-MEK signal and the small GTPase Rac are essential for the LPA-induced shedding. On the other hand, protein kinase C and ADAM 9 protease are essential for the TPA-induced shedding. Furthermore, p38 MAPK is essential for the stress- and IL-1 beta-induced shedding. Finally there is a mechanism for activation of HB-EGF regulated by the environment in the living body.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Selective regulation of Gq signaling by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2: direct interaction of kinase N terminus with activated galphaq.

In this study, we investigated the regulation of different G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-stimulated signaling pathways by GPCR kinase 2 (GRK2). We used thyrotropin receptor, which is coupled to different G proteins, to investigate the regulation of Galphas- and Galphaq-mediated signaling (assessed by cAMP and inositol phosphate production, respectively). In transfected cells, both pathways were desensitized by GRK2. However a kinase-dead GRK2 mutant (GRK2-K220R) only decreased inositol phosphate production, indicating that GRK2 could regulate Galphaq signaling through a phosphorylation-independent mechanism. Similar results were obtained with serotonin receptor 5-hydroxytryptamine(2C), which is coupled to Galphaq. This effect was mimicked by the N-terminal domain of GRK2 (GRK2-Nter), but not by the C-terminal domain. In cells transfected with Galphaq, direct activation of Galphaq signaling (by AlF(4)(-)) was desensitized by GRK2-Nter, indicating an effect at the Galpha-level. For comparison, in parallel samples we studied a protein regulator of G protein signaling RGS4 and we found a similar regulatory profile. We therefore hypothesized that the GRK2-Nter could directly interact with the Galphaq subunit to regulate its signaling, as demonstrated for several RGS proteins. This hypothesis is further supported by the presence, within the GRK2-Nter, of an RGS homology domain. In direct binding experiments, we found that GRK2-Nter interacts with Galphaq (only when activated) but not with Galphas and Galphao. We conclude that GRK2, besides desensitizing the GPCR by phosphorylation, is able to selectively bind to Galphaq and to regulate its signaling.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Neutral endopeptidase inhibits neuropeptide-mediated transactivation of the insulin-like growth factor receptor-Akt cell survival pathway.

G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists such as neuropeptides activate the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR) or the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt, suggesting that neuropeptides-GPCR signaling can cross-communicate with IGF-IR-Akt signaling pathways. Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP) is a cell-surface peptidase that cleaves and inactivates the neuropeptides endothelin-1 (ET-1) and bombesin, which are implicated in progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer (PC). We investigated the mechanisms of NEP regulation of neuropeptide-mediated cell survival in PC cells, including whether neuropeptide substrates of NEP induce phosphorylations of IGF-IR and Akt in PC cells. Western analyses revealed ET-1 and bombesin treatment induced phosphorylation of IGF-IRbeta and Akt independent of IGF-I in TSU-Pr1, DU145, and PC-3 PC cells, which lack NEP expression, but not in NEP-expressing LNCaP cells. Recombinant NEP and induced NEP expression in TSU-Pr1 cells using a tetracycline-repressive expression system inhibited ET-1-mediated phosphorylation of IGF-IRbeta and Akt, and blocked the protective effects of ET-1 against apoptosis induced by serum starvation. Incubation of TSU-Pr1 cells with specific kinase inhibitors together with ET-1 or bombesin showed that IGF-IR activation is required for neuropeptide-induced Akt phosphorylation, and that neuropeptide-induced Akt activation is predominantly mediated by Src and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase but not by mitogen-activated protein kinase or protein kinase C. These data show that the neuropeptides ET-1 and bombesin stimulate ligand-independent activation of the IGF-IR, which results in Akt activation, and that this cross-communication between GPCR and IGF-IR signaling is inhibited by NEP.

Bombesin↗
PubMed2002

Guanosine phosphate binding protein coupled receptors in prostate cancer: a review.

PURPOSE: Androgens are the primary growth promoters of the prostate gland and yet prostate tumors progress despite androgen ablation. This progression suggests a role for additional cellular factors in the progression to androgen independent disease. We examined the role of a family of extracellular signal regulators, namely the guanosine phosphate binding (G) protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family, in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed on GPCRs and prostate cancer, and supplemented with published and unpublished observations made at our laboratory. Emphasis was placed on the mechanistic aspects of mitogenic signaling pathways involved to identify potential targets for therapy. RESULTS: Expression of some GPCRs and GPCR ligands is elevated in prostate cancer cells and adjacent prostatic stromal tissue. In vitro studies demonstrate that activation of GPCRs confers a distinct growth and survival advantage on prostate cancer cells, including enhanced proliferation and decreased programmed cell death (apoptosis). Specifically stimulation of GPCRs for lysophosphatidic acid and bradykinin induces proliferation of androgen independent prostate cancer cells via the activation of the extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. Induction of ERK by the bradykinin and lysophosphatidic acid in prostate cells proceeds via distinct pathways and involves Galphaq and Gbetagamma subunits, respectively. The Gbetagamma dependent activation of ERK requires tyrosine kinases, including epidermal growth factor receptor and c-Src. Furthermore, stimulation with LPA enhances the survival of prostate cancer cells via activation of the inducible transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB. CONCLUSIONS: GPCR stimulation induces proliferation and prevents apoptosis of hormone independent prostate cancer cells, indicating their important role in the progression of prostate cancer. While further confirmatory studies are required to verify the role of GPCRs in disease progression, the therapeutic implications of these studies may enhance the armamentarium in the fight against prostate cancer.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2002

c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase pathway in growth-promoting effect of the G protein-coupled receptor cholecystokinin B receptor: a protein kinase C/Src-dependent-mechanism.

The proliferative effects of gastrin on normal and malignant gastrointestinal tissues have been shown to be mediated by a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), the cholecystokinin B receptor. The c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway has been implicated in the regulation of mitogenesis by growth factors or cytokines. However, the contribution of this signaling cascade to the proliferative effects of GPCR remains largely unknown. Here, we show that cholecystokinin B receptor occupancy by gastrin leads to the activation of the JNK pathway. The mechanism involves certain protein kinase C isoforms and Src family kinases other than p60Src. The complex p130Cas/CrkII, known to be involved in JNK activation, is also activated in response to gastrin by a protein kinase C- and Src-dependent mechanism. However, gastrin-induced CrkII and JNK pathways are independent. Using a dominant negative mutant of c-Jun, we blocked the ability of gastrin to induce DNA synthesis, demonstrating a major role of the JNK pathway in the growth-promoting effect of a GPCR agonist.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Lysophosphatidic acid-induced squamous cell carcinoma cell proliferation and motility involves epidermal growth factor receptor signal transactivation.

Transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represents the paradigm for cross-talk between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. In a variety of squamous cell carcinoma cell lines of the head and neck (HNSCCs), we found that treatment with the GPCR agonists lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), bradykinin, thrombin, and carbachol results in rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGFR. In these tumor cells, signal transactivation of the EGFR and the oncoprotein HER2/neu is critically dependent on metalloprotease activity. Using the metalloprotease inhibitor batimastat, the EGFR-specific tyrphostin AG1478, and a dominant-negative EGFR mutant, we show that in HNSCC cell lines, EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation, recruitment of the adaptor proteins SHC and Gab1, and activation of the ERK/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in response to LPA depend both on metalloprotease function and EGFR tyrosine kinase activity. Most importantly, critical characteristics of HNSCC cell lines such as DNA synthesis, cell cycle progression and tumor cell migration are stimulated by LPA and can be abrogated by interfering with EGFR signal transmission. Together, our results demonstrate the importance of a mechanism that promotes head and neck cancer cell proliferation and motility by GPCR ligands involving EGFR transactivation. Our findings suggest that highly abundant GPCR ligands such as LPA may function as tumor promoters and determinants of HNSCC progression.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2002

Rab11a and myosin Vb regulate recycling of the M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Agonist-induced internalization followed by subsequent return to the cell surface regulates G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activity. Because the cellular responsiveness to ligand depends on the balance between receptor degradation and recycling, it is crucial to identify the molecules involved in GPCR recovery to the cell surface. In this study, we identify mechanisms involved in the recycling of the M4 subtype of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. M4 is highly expressed in the CNS, plays a role in locomotor activity, and is a novel therapeutic target for neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Previous studies show that, after cholinergic stimulation, M4 internalizes from the cell surface to endosomes in cell culture and the rat brain. Here, we show that, after activation, M4 traffics to transferrin receptor- and Rab11a-positive perinuclear endosomes. Expression of the constitutively GDP-bound, inactive mutant Rab11aS25N inhibits M4 trafficking to recycling endosomes. Expression of the C-terminal tail of myosin Vb, a Rab11a effector, enhances M4 accumulation in perinuclear endosomes. Both Rab11aS25N and the myosin Vb tail impair M4 recycling. The results demonstrate that GPCR recycling is mediated through a discrete pathway using both Rab11a and myosin Vb.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Role and modulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling in inflammatory processes.

Many extracellular stimuli, such as neurotransmitters, hormones, chemokines, proteinases, inflammatory mediators, odorants, and light, are recognized by the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Immune cells express GPCRs for classical chemoattractants, chemokines, neuropeptides, and neurotransmitters. GPCRs transmit information by interacting with heterotrimeric G proteins, resulting in rapid and transient signaling. The signal given by GPCRs is terminated rapidly by the activity of regulators of G protein signaling (RGS). In addition, GPCR responsiveness diminishes after repeated or prolonged exposure to the agonist. This process of homologous desensitization of GPCRs is dependent on receptor phosphorylation by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). In this review, we describe the role of RGS and GRKs in the regulation of GPCR signaling in the immune system, with special emphasis on the role of changes in GRKs and RGS expression during (auto) immune processes. Since altered regulation of GPCR signaling can influence disease states, the molecules involved in this process can also represent attractive therapeutic targets.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Using in silico biology to facilitate drug development.

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) mediation of cardiac excitability is often overlooked in predicting the likelihood that a compound will alter repolarization. While the areas of GPCR signal transduction and electrophysiology are rich in data, experiments combining the two are difficult. In silico modelling facilitates the integration of all relevant data in both areas to explore the hypothesis that critical associations may exist between the different GPCR signalling mechanisms and cardiac excitability and repolarization. An example of this linkage is suggested by the observation that a mutation of the gene encoding HERG, the pore-forming subunit of the rapidly activating delayed rectifier K+ current (I(Kr)), leads to a form of long QT syndrome in which affected individuals are vulnerable to stress-induced arrhythmia following beta-adrenergic stimulation. Using Physiome's In Silico Cell, we constructed a model integrating the signalling mechanisms of second messengers cAMP and protein kinase A with I(Kr) in a cardiac myocyte. We analysed the model to identify the second messengers that most strongly influence I(Kr) behaviour. Our conclusions indicate that the dynamics of regulation are multifactorial, and that Physiome's approach to in silico modelling helps elucidate the subtle control mechanisms at play.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2004

Novel G protein-coupled receptors as pain targets.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their ligands play a number of important roles in the modulation of acute and chronic pain. Indeed, opioid and cannabinoid ligands are of established therapeutic value for pain management, and further exploitation of the specific GPCR subtypes (delta-opioid, CB1 and CB2) for these ligands may yield more selective, potent analgesics with favorable side effects. More recent identification of a number of other GPCRs involved in pain pathways (eg, sensory neuron specific receptors) and selective ligands that modulate pain transmission, has highlighted further therapeutic opportunities. A further challenge to understanding pain modulation and an additional dimension for targeting analgesia is the discovery of GPCR heteromerization and accessory and regulatory proteins, such as regulator of G protein-signaling proteins, involved in expression and regulation of GPCR.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2005

Gastric mucin secretion in response to beta-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor activation is mediated by SRC kinase-dependent epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation.

In many systems, the integration of converging regulatory signals that relay on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation into functional cellular pathways requires the involvement of receptor tyrosine kinase. In this report, we provide evidence that activation of GPCR by beta-adrenergic agonist leading to stimulation in gastric mucin secretion requires epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) participation. Using [(3)H]glucosamine-labeled gastric mucosal cells, we show that stimulatory effect of beta-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol, on mucin secretion was inhibited by EGFR kinase inhibitor, PD153035, as well as wortmannin, a specific inhibitor of PI3K. Both inhibitors, moreover, blunted the mucin secretory responses to beta-adrenergic agonist-generated second messenger, cAMP as well as adenylate cyclase activator, forskolin. The gastric mucin secretory responses to isoproterenol, furthermore, were inhibited by PP2, a selective inhibitor of tyrosine kinase Src responsible for ligand-independent EGFR autophosphorylation, but not by ERK inhibitor, PD98059. The inhibition of ERK, moreover, did not cause attenuation in mucin secretion in response to cAMP and forskolin. The findings underline the role of EGFR as a convergence point in gastric mucin secretion triggered by beta-adrenergic GPCR activation, and demonstrate the requirement for Src kinase in EGFR transactivation.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Gastrointestinal peptide signalling in health and disease.

Gastrointestinal peptides including mammalian bombesin-like peptides, cholecystokinin (CCK), gastrin, and neurotensin stimulate DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in cultured cells and are implicated as growth factors in a number of fundamental processes including development, inflammation, tissue regeneration, and neoplastic transformation. These agonists bind to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that promote Galpha q-mediated activation of beta isoforms of phospholipase C to produce two second messengers: Inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate {Ins (1, 4, 5) P3} that mobilises Ca2+ from internal stores, and diacylglycerol that activates the classic and new isoforms of the protein kinase C (PKC) family. PKCs play a critical part in transducing bombesin/gastrin releasing peptide (GRP) receptor signals into activation of protein kinase cascades. Protein kinase D (PKD), a serine/threonine protein kinase with distinct structural and enzymological properties, is activated by phosphorylation in living cells through a new PKC-dependent signal transduction pathway. GPCR agonists including bombesin/GRP induce a rapid and striking activation of PKD by PKC. These results indicate that PKD functions downstream from PKCs and identify a new phosphorylation cascade that is activated by gastrointestinal peptide agonists. The bombesin/GRP GPCR also promotes rapid Rho-dependent assembly of focal adhesions, formation of actin stress fibres and tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple cellular proteins. We identified p125 focal adhesion kinase (FAK), p130 Crk-associated substrate (CAS) and paxillin as prominent targets of gastrointestinal peptide-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation and developed a model that envisages a G12/Rho-dependent pathway connecting GPCR activation to the tyrosine phosphorylation of these focal adhesion proteins. Separate pathways mediate gastrointestinal peptide stimulation of additional tyrosine kinase pathways including transactivation of Src and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Tyrosine phosphorylation has a critical role in gastrointestinal peptide-induced cellular migration and cooperates with Gq-stimulated events to promote mitogenesis. The growth-promoting effects of neuropeptides and the elucidation of the signalling pathways that mediate their effects assume an added importance because these agonists and their receptors are increasingly implicated in sustaining the proliferation of clinically aggressive solid tumours including those from lung, pancreas, and colon.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Effect of uncoupling agents on AT1 receptor affinity for antagonist analogs of angiotensin II.

AT1 receptor is responsible for most of the physiological effects of Angiotensin II (Ang II). AT1 receptor belongs to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, and it mediates its actions through the coupling of the Gq/11 protein with phospholipase C beta. Classical pharmacology has used the sensitivity of GPCR ligands to uncoupling agents as a criteria to discriminate agonists (which are sensitive) from antagonists (which are insensitive). In this study, the uncoupling agents GTP gamma S and pentosan sulfate (PS) (a low molecular weight polyanion) were used to further characterize the molecular interactions between Ang II analogs and the AT1 receptor. We show that some Ang II antagonists are sensitive to the conformational change of the AT1 receptor induced by uncoupling agents. These results demonstrate that there is no direct relationship between the intrinsic activity of a ligand and its affinity for different conformations of the AT1 receptor and that the sensitivity of GPCR ligands to uncoupling agents can not be used as a criteria to discriminate agonists from antagonists.

Adrenal Cortex↗
PubMed1998

Signal transduction pathways in the mitogenic response to G protein-coupled neuropeptide receptor agonists.

Neuropeptides, including mammalian bombesin-like peptides, act as potent cellular growth factors and have been implicated in a variety of normal and abnormal processes, including development, inflammation, and malignant transformation. These signaling peptides exert their characteristic effects on cellular processes by binding to specific G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) on the surface of their target cells. Typically, the binding of a neuropeptide to its cognate GPCR triggers the activation of multiple signal transduction pathways that act in a synergistic and combinatorial fashion to relay the mitogenic signal to the nucleus and promote cell proliferation. A rapid increase in the synthesis of lipid-derived second messengers with subsequent activation of protein phosphorylation cascades is an important early response to neuropeptides. An emerging theme in signal transduction is that these agonists also induce rapid and coordinate tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins including the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase p125fak and the adaptor proteins p130cas and paxillin. This tyrosine phosphorylation pathway depends on the integrity of the actin cytoskeleton and requires functional Rho. The purpose of this article is to review recent advances in unraveling the pathways that play a role in transducing mitogenic and migratory responses induced by G protein-coupled neuropeptide receptor agonists.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Application of zwitterionic detergents to the solubilization of integral membrane proteins for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry.

Comparative analysis has long been utilized in biological research to interpret protein interactions in both drug naïve versus drug challenged and normal versus diseased tissues. The technology of proteomics today allows researchers to provide insight into old and still open questions related to biological mechanisms while offering the opportunity to discover novel details in cellular lifecycles. Perhaps the most powerful way to execute these differential displays is in the combination of two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. While these two techniques together are well suited for abundant and soluble proteins found in cells, rare proteins and integral membrane proteins are still problematic. Recently, a series of novel zwitterionic detergents has been reported in the literature that shows a substantial improvement in solubilizing integral membrane proteins. We show that the amidosulfobetaine, 4-octylbenzol amidosulfobetaine, is better than 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylamino]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) at solubilizing both an ion channel and a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), while another amidosulfobetaine, myristic amidosulfobetaine (ASB-14), was better than CHAPS at solubilizing a GPCR. Neither membrane protein was visible after staining with colloidal Coomassie blue, silver nor Sypro Ruby. However, a comparison against a duplicate immunoblot allowed for the localization and identification of the ion channel from a 2-D gel by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Amino Acid Sequence↗