SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Filgrastim”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: clinical and economic benefits.

Neutropenia is the primary dose-limiting toxicity in patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy, leading in some cases to substantial morbidity and early mortality, and disrupting treatment with potentially curative regimens. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) such as filgrastim (Neupogen) and pegfilgrastim (Neulasta), as primary prophylaxis starting in the first cycle of chemotherapy, has been shown to reduce the rates of febrile neutropenia (FN) and of FN-related hospitalization, as well as the use of intravenous anti-infectives. A recent meta-analysis has shown significantly lower infection-related mortality with the first-cycle use of G-CSFs. Both filgrastim and pegfilgrastim were originally approved on the basis of their effectiveness in patients treated with chemotherapy regimens that are associated with a 40% or greater risk of FN. Pegfilgrastim, which is given once per cycle, has been shown to reduce the risk of FN by 94% in breast cancer patients treated with docetaxel (Taxotere). In addition, a recent cost-minimization analysis has shown that first-cycle use of pegfilgrastim may be cost-neutral in patients in whom the predicted risk of FN is less than 20%. These findings have important implications for clinical guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and FN.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2006

[Hematopoietic growth factors and autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation].

Hematopoietic growth factors are usually administered in autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. RhuG-CSF and rhuEPO are the most frequently used, either for mobilization of peripheral stem cells or after transplantation for the improvement of hematologic recovery. G-CSF (filgrastim or lenograstim) can be administered alone or in combination with stem cell factor to enhance stem cells mobilization. IL-3 and sargramostim are not used anymore. The protocol of administration of rhuG-CSF is well established. Furthermore, stem cell transplantation with peripheral cells is less expensive than with bone marrow. RhuEPO (erythropoietin) is not effective in mobilization. After transplantation, filgrastim or lenograstim can shorten the neutropenic period and decrease infectious complications. The potential effect of these growth factors on the incidence and the severity of GvHD is still unknown and under debate. The use of rhuEPO after transplantation might be of interest to reduce the need of red blood cell transfusion. Some studies suggest that the administration of rhuEPO should start before delivering the conditioning regimen. The new long acting growth factors such as pegfilgrastim are still under evaluation and their use in mobilization seems promising.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1994

Patient characteristics associated with successful mobilizing and autografting of peripheral blood progenitor cells in malignant lymphoma.

For patients with advanced-stage or poor-prognosis malignant lymphoma, high-dose therapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support may become a first-line treatment. The duration of severe cytopenia in this setting is inversely related to the number of PBPCs autografted. In a retrospective analysis, we therefore looked for factors influencing the yield of PBPCs in 61 patients (16 with high-grade and 29 with low-/intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL], and 16 with Hodgkin's disease) who received cytotoxic chemotherapy and filgrastim (R-metHuG-CSF, 300 micrograms/d; median, 4.2 micrograms/kg/d; range, 2.7 to 6.6 micrograms/kg/d; subcutaneously). Sixteen patients had active disease, while 45 were in partial remission (PR) or complete remission (CR) after conventional therapy. A median of three leukaphereses (range, one to 10) resulted in a median of 5.7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 0.03 to 31.1 x 10(6)). Previous cytotoxic chemotherapy and irradiation adversely affected the yield of CD34+ cells. Each cycle of chemotherapy is associated with an average decrease of 0.2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg per leukapheresis in nonirradiated patients, while large-field radiotherapy reduces the collection efficiency by an average of 1.8 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells. The collection efficiency was also significantly lower in patients with Hodgkin's disease. However, except for one, all had been previously irradiated. In contrast, age, sex, disease status, bone marrow involvement during mobilization, and the time since the last chemotherapy or radiotherapy were not significantly related to the collection efficiency. Following high-dose conditioning therapy, 42 patients were autografted with filgrastim-mobilized PBPCs. Hematological recovery (neutrophils > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L and an unsupported platelet count > or = 20 x 10(9)/L) within 2 weeks was observed in patients autografted with > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. In seven patients, the quantity of CD34+ cells reinfused was below this threshold. They required a median of 17 days (range, 11 to 34) and 31 days (range, 13 to 141) for neutrophil and platelet recovery, respectively. If autografting with PBPCs in malignant lymphoma with poor prognosis is being considered, mobilization and harvesting should be planned early after initial diagnosis to avoid exhaustion of hematopoiesis by cumulative toxicity.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of glycosylated and non-glycosylated G-CSFs, alone and in combination with other cytokines, on the growth of human progenitor cells.

Two recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (rHu G-CSF) are clinically available, a glycosylated (lenograstim) and a nonglycosylated from (filgrastim). Since there is accumulating evidence that glycosylation plays a role in the in vitro activity of the G-CSF molecule, we compared the biological potency of lenograstim and filgrastim on human hematopoietic progenitor cells by colony assay in semisolid medium and ex vivo expansion experiments. Leukapheretic products without further processing and CD34-positive purified cells were used as source of human progenitors. Lenograstim demonstrated greater capacity, to stimulate the colony growth of both, purified and CD34+ peripheral blood cells. This effect, which is evident especially at low doses of growth factor, seems not to be mediated by accessory cells. Whether these observations may have clinical relevance is still to be clearly assessed and further investigations are needed.

Antigens, CD↗

PubMed1996

A dose-finding study of epirubicin in combination with paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

We performed a dose escalation study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given over 3 hours plus bolus epirubicin 90 mg/m2. The starting dose of paclitaxel, 135 mg/m2, was escalated by 20-mg/m2 increments in cohorts of three to six patients. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/d) was administered to shorten the duration of grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than 72 hours. Twenty-nine patients have been treated, 86% of whom had failed adjuvant chemotherapy (with anthracyclines in 14 cases). One hundred forty-eight courses have been administered, and the paclitaxel dose has been escalated to 225 mg/m2 without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. The most frequent dose-related toxicity has been grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 59% of courses. The median duration of grade 4 neutropenia was 4 days, which was shortened with filgrastim only in patients treated with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2. Eleven episodes of febrile neutropenia (7% of courses) have been observed. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild or moderate: grade 1 or 2 peripheral neuropathy was reported by 41% and 10% of patients, respectively. The cardiac toxicities of this regimen were surprisingly low: median left ventricular ejection fraction was 57% at study entry and 56% after six courses. Only two patients showed a decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% after six courses, and no signs of anthracycline-induced congestive heart failure were noted. The activity of this novel combination is encouraging: the overall response rate is 80%, with 16% complete responses. We have demonstrated that the combination of epirubicin plus paclitaxel given over 3 hours is feasible with acceptable toxicities, does not appear to be associated with clinically relevant cardiotoxicity, and is active in a population of patients who have failed adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Management of chemotherapy in a pregnancy complicated by a large neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: The English literature contains infrequent reports of neuroendocrine carcinoma during pregnancy. The chemotherapy for this type of malignancy can cause severe nausea and neutropenia. We used recently developed modalities to ameliorate these side effects. CASE: A 22-year-old woman, gravida 4, para 2-0-1-2, presented at 24 weeks' gestation with a complaint of massive lower-extremity edema. Computed tomography scan delineated a large retroperitoneal mass. Biopsy of a small neck mass revealed a poorly differentiated neuroblastoma. A multidisciplinary approach to therapy was undertaken. The patient received cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Complications of the first course included severe neutropenia and nausea with vomiting. Filgrastim and ondansetron were used to treat these complications. She delivered an 1825-g healthy male by cesarean for fetal distress at 35 weeks. No anomalies were noted at birth. Neonatal hematologic indices were normal CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach to rare malignancies is warranted in pregnancy. Filgrastim and ondansetron are effective agents in the treatment of chemotherapy-associated complications. Their use in pregnancy warrants further investigations.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

High-dose therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. The combination of more active agents like vinorelbine and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) with cisplatin has led to improved survival for patients with advanced metastatic disease. The ability to escalate the dose of cisplatin-based regimens is limited by nonhematologic toxicities and is especially difficult in the population of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, the development of new agents with significant activity against NSCLC as well as new strategies for high-dose therapy have made it possible to examine the potential of dose-intense therapy in this population. A phase I trial performed at the University of North Carolina was designed to evaluate paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 given over 24 hours plus escalating doses of carboplatin starting at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) dose of 8 supported by peripheral blood stem cells and filgrastim in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The AUC dose of carboplatin was escalated in increments of 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin combined with paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours was defined at an AUC of 18. In this study, six of seven patients with advanced NSCLC had major responses. This regimen is currently being tested in patients with locally advanced NSCLC by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B: patients receive two cycles of induction therapy with paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 over 3 hours followed by carboplatin at an AUC of 18 supported by peripheral blood stem cells and filgrastim. Depending on response to induction therapy, patients then receive surgical resection, thoracic radiation therapy, or both. This phase II trial will examine clinical and pathologic responses and the toxicity of this high-dose regimen in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Ultimately, phase III trials will be needed to establish the role of this approach in NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2004

Sweet's syndrome associated with sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) treatment.

Sweet's syndrome is an acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis that is a known complication of the administration of filgrastim, a drug that causes increased neutrophil proliferation and differentiation. This complication has not previously been reported during treatment with sargramostim, a hematopoietic cytokine with activity that overlaps filgrastim. We report a case of Sweet's syndrome in association with sargramostim treatment following chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia. A suspected second episode occurred after subsequent chemotherapy and sargramostim treatment. Physicians should be aware of this possible association because the signs and symptoms of Sweet's syndrome are easily mistaken as being due to infection.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1998

Saquinavir enhances the mucosal toxicity of infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Protease inhibitors are an important new class of agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The purpose of our trial was to determine the feasibility of combining the protease inhibitor saquinavir with a 96-hour continuous intravenous infusion of cyclophosphamide (800 mg/M2), doxorubicin (50 mg/M2, and etoposide (240 mg/M2) (CDE) plus filgrastim in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma associated with HIV infection. The effect of saquinavir on CDE-induced myelosuppression, CD4 lymphopenia, and non-hematologic toxicity was also sought. Twelve patients with HIV-related lymphoma received CDE every 28 or more days. All patients received saquinavir (600mg PO TID), filgrastim and Pneumocystis carinii and fungal prophylaxis. Patients also received either stavudine (n = 2) or both stavudine and didanosine (n = 10). Toxicity was analyzed using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for each cycle and the data were compared with the data from our prior study of CDE plus didanosine. An interim analysis was performed after accrual of the first 12 patients in order to assess toxicity. Severe (grade 3 or 4) mucositis occurred in eight of 12 patients (67%) treated with CDE plus saquinavir compared with three of 25 patients (12%) in our prior study treated with CDE without saquinavir (P < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, saquinavir use was the only factor associated with a significantly greater risk of severe mucositis (relative risk 7.9; P = 0.03). Saquinavir use was not associated with a significant difference in the incidence of febrile neutropenia, prolonged neutropenia, chemotherapy dose reduction, or in the degree of myelosuppression. The decrease in CD4 lymphocytes for patients treated with saquinavir (absolute decrease of 23/microL, or a 26% decrease from baseline) was significantly less than for patients treated without saquinavir in the prior study (absolute decrease of 91/microL, or 42% decrease from baseline; P = 0.05). Four of 10 patients (40%) treated with saquinavir had an increase in CD4 lymphocytes of > or = 10/microL compared with none of 25 patients (0%) treated without saquinavir (P < 0.001). Combination of the protease inhibitor saquinavir with infusional CDE in patients with HIV-associated lymphoma was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of severe mucositis. This finding suggests that saquinavir may alter the metabolism of one of more of the cytotoxic agents in the CDE regimen, and underscores the need for careful investigation regarding the use of the protease inhibitors in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Optimising management of neutropenia and anaemia in cancer chemotherapy-advances in cytokine therapy.

Neutropenia and anaemia are serious complications of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. They have a negative impact on patient quality of life and may reduce response to treatment. Febrile neutropenia, a potentially life-threatening complication of neutropenia, frequently requires hospital admission, while fatigue and weakness from anaemia reduce patient's capacity for activity. Pegfilgrastim and darbepoetin alfa, were designed to simplify and optimise treatment for patients with cancer. Once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim is as effective as daily filgrastim with respect to duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) and may have a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia than filgrastim. Darbepoetin alfa has enhanced biological activity and a serum terminal half-life three-fold longer than that of erythropoietin (EPO), which translates into rapid and sustained correction of anaemia with less frequent dosing. These novel cytokines have the potential to simplify the management of neutropenia and anaemia with fewer injections and less disruption to patients daily lives.

Anemia↗

PubMed2005

Cancer in the older person.

Cancer in the older person is an increasingly common problem, due to the progressive prolongation of the life-expectancy of the Western population. This article reviews the mechanisms associating aging and cancer, age-related changes in cancer biology, assessment of the older person to estimate life-expectancy, treatment tolerance, and medical and social conditions that may interfere with cancer treatment, effectiveness of cancer prevention and cancer treatment in older individuals. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is commonly used to predict life-expectancy and functional reserve and to unearth conditions that may jeopardize cancer prevention and treatment. In the interest of cost and time, shortened forms of CGA are being explored. Chemoprevention of cancer is a promising form of prevention that at present has no conclusive clinical indications. Early diagnosis of breast and colon cancer through screening of asymptomatic patients at risk may be beneficial for individuals with a life-expectancy of 5 years or longer. Early detection of lung cancer in ex-smokers is undergoing clinical trials, as this disease is becoming more and more common. Age should not prevent appropriate treatment of cancer in older individuals, especially in those with adequate life-expectancy and functional reserve. The National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) has issued a series of guidelines to minimize the toxicity and promote the effectiveness of cancer in older patients. Important interventions include prevention of neutropaenic infections with filgrastim and peg-filgrastim, prevention of anaemia with epoietin or darbepoietin, and prevention and early management of mucositis.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is not only a major risk factor for infection-related morbidity and mortality, but is also a significant dose-limiting toxicity in cancer treatment. Patients developing severe (grade 3/4) or febrile neutropenia (FN) during chemotherapy frequently receive dose reductions and/or delays to their chemotherapy. This may impact on the success of treatment, particularly when treatment intent is either curative or to prolong survival. The incidence of severe or FN can be reduced by prophylactic treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs), such as filgrastim, lenograstim or pegfilgrastim. However, the use of G-CSF prophylactic treatment varies widely in clinical practice, both in the timing of therapy and in the patients to whom it is offered. While several academic groups have produced evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in an effort to standardise and optimise the management of FN, there remains a need for generally applicable, European-focused guidelines. To this end, we undertook a systematic literature review and formulated recommendations for the use of G-CSF in adult cancer patients at risk of chemotherapy-induced FN. We recommend that patient-related adverse risk factors such as elderly age (>or=65 years), be evaluated in the overall assessment of FN risk prior to administering each cycle of chemotherapy. In addition, when using a chemotherapy regimen associated with FN in >20% patients, prophylactic G-CSF is recommended. When using a chemotherapy regimen associated with FN in 10-20% patients, particular attention should be given to patient-related risk factors that may increase the overall risk of FN. In situations where dose-dense or dose-intense chemotherapy strategies have survival benefits, prophylactic G-CSF support is recommended. Similarly, if reductions in chemotherapy dose intensity or density are known to be associated with a poor prognosis, primary G-CSF prophylaxis may be used to maintain chemotherapy. Finally, studies have shown that filgrastim, lenograstim and pegfilgrastim have clinical efficacy and we recommend the use of any of these agents to prevent FN and FN-related complications, where indicated.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2006

Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequential topotecan-carboplatin-etoposide in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

The inhibition of topoisomerase I by topotecan results in a compensatory increase in topoisomerase II associated with increased in vitro sensitivity of tumors to etoposide. Maximal synergy has been observed for the sequence of topotecan followed by etoposide. Carboplatin has clinical activity when combined with either of these two agents. These interactions were the pharmacologic rationale for topotecan p.o. days 1-5, carboplatin i.v. day 6, and etoposide p.o. days 6-10. Three successive dose levels were explored: (1) topotecan 2mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 150 mg/day; (2) topotecan 3mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 150 mg/day; and (3) topotecan 3mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 200mg/day. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day was injected s.c. days 11-18. Up to 6 cycles were administered every 21 days. Eligible patients had measurable or evaluable, extensive disease, small lung cell lung cancer, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG performance status 0-2, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. Follow-up was weekly for CBC. Tumor response was assessed after 2 and 6 cycles. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any of the following in cycle 1: grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity other than nausea and vomiting, grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 3 days, neutropenic fever or sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, or failure to recover neutrophils >or=1500/microl or platelets >or=100,000/microl by day 28. Ten patients were enrolled: median age 62 (range, 50-79); female/male 4/6; and performance status 0/1/2 in 2/7/1. Three patients each were treated on dose levels 1 and 2 without DLT. The first 2 patients entered on dose level 3 had no DLT. The third patient on dose level 3 developed grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 3 days, neutropenic fever, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia on day 15 of cycle 1. The fourth patient on dose level 3 developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia on day 18 of cycle 1. One patient received only 1 cycle and was not evaluable for response. Seven patients completed 6 cycles: 1 had a complete response and 6 achieved a partial response. The third patient on dose level 3 received 2 cycles and had stable disease, but had to be removed from protocol treatment because of grade 4 neutropenia despite dose reduction in cycle 2. The fourth patient on dose level 3 achieved a partial response, but had to be removed from protocol therapy after cycle 5 because of recurrent grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is topotecan 3mg/day p.o. days 1-5, carboplatin AUC 5i.v. day 6, and etoposide 150 mg/day p.o. days 6-10 with filgrastim.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer: pathologic complete response and longitudinal assessment of impact on cognitive functioning.

BACKGROUND: To determine the pathologic complete response rate of advanced ovarian cancer to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin with filgrastim, and assess the longitudinal impact of this regimen on quality-of-life and cognitive functioning. METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer were treated in the phase I portion of the study. Initial doses were paclitaxel: 60 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, and 15; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: area under the curve (AUC) 5 day 1, every 21 days for 6 cycles with filgrastim. Twenty-seven patients were treated at the phase II dose. Pathologic response was assessed by second-look laparoscopy in patients with complete response. Patients completed longitudinal assessments of quality-of-life and cognitive functioning. RESULTS: Maximally tolerated doses were paclitaxel: 80 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: AUC 5 day 1, every 21 days. Forty-eight percent of patients (13/27) experienced at least 1 grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Fifty percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-69%) of assessable patients achieved pathologic complete response. Median progression-free survival was 27.3 months (95% CI, 17.7 months to not reached), and overall survival 43.6 months (95% CI, 42 months to not reached). Cognitive functioning did not decline during or after chemotherapy. More highly educated women reported a perceived decline in concentration and memory while on chemotherapy. Quality-of-life scores were maintained during therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer achieved pathologic complete response to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin. Cognitive functioning did not decline by objective measures, although highly educated women reported subjective impairment.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel weekly administration in advanced breast cancer: a phase I study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Both cisplatin and epirubicin have been shown to enhance the antitumor activity of paclitaxel in vitro. Weekly administration could result in a substantial improvement in the therapeutic index of cisplatin and paclitaxel. This study was aimed at determining the MTDs of epirubicin and paclitaxel given weekly with a fixed dose of cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three breast cancer patients with advanced disease (24 locally advanced and 39 metastatic), who had not received prior chemotherapy (except adjuvant), received weekly cisplatin (CDDP) doses of 30 mg/m2 together with escalating doses of paclitaxel (PTX) and epirubicin (EPI) for a minimum of six cycles. The dose escalation was stopped if DLT occurred during the first six treatment cycles in > 33% of patients of a given cohort. RESULTS: Nine different dose levels were tested, for a total of 506 weekly cycles delivered. G-CSF support on days 3-5 of each week was also given in the last four cohorts (24 patients). An overall 11 patients showed DLT in the first six cycles. EPI and PTX doses up to 40 and 85 mg/m2/week, respectively, were safely delivered without G-CSF support. However, the actually delivered mean dose intensity was only 64% in this cohort. Therefore, the dose escalation continued with the addition of filgrastim from day 3 to day 5 each week. Doses of EPI and PTX up to 50 and 120 mg/m2/week were administered without observing DLT in the first six cycles in more than one third of the patients enrolled. No toxic deaths were observed. Only two patients had to be hospitalized because of sepsis. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 25, 9, and 16 patients, respectively. Alopecia was almost universal. Other nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild, being of grade 3-4 in only eight patients (fatigue and loss of appetite in two cases, diarrhoea in four cases, peripheral neuropathy and mucositis in one case). Fifteen complete and 37 partial responses have been registered for an 82% (95% CI = 71-91) overall clinical response rate (ORR). Eight complete and 14 partial responses occurred in the 24 patients with locally advanced disease, for a 92% (95% CI = 73-99) ORR, as compared to seven complete and 23 partial responses in the 39 women with metastatic disease, 77% (95% CI = 61-89). A clear dose-response relationship was not observed, since an overall response rate of at least 70% was achieved at all dose levels. However, the ORR increased to 92% in the last four cohorts which included patients who received higher doses of EPI and PTX with G-CSF support. All of the 24 patients with locally advanced disease underwent modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection. Three of them showed no invasive cancer on pathologic examination, and in another five patients a tumor smaller than 1 cm was found in the surgical specimen of the breast. At a nine-month median follow-up (range 2-14), 11 patients have progressed and three have died. Twenty-three out of 24 patients who underwent surgery are still free from progression. The one-year projected progression-free survival is 77% for the whole population. CONCLUSIONS: The CDDP/EPI/PTX weekly administration is a well tolerated and very effective approach in advanced breast cancer patients. Full doses of all the three drugs can be delivered even in absence of G-CSF support. A very impressive increment of the dose-intensity can be obtained, however, by adding filgrastim. A phase II study is under way to better define the therapeutic efficacy of this regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Cisplatin-topotecan-paclitaxel weekly administration with G-CSF support for ovarian and small-cell lung cancer patients: a dose-finding study.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel (PTX) and topotecan (TPT) have shown promising antitumor activity in both ovarian cancer (OC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. This phase I study was aimed at determining the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of TPT given weekly over 30 min in combination with fixed doses of cisplatin (CDDP) and (PTX), and with G-CSF support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with OC (19) or SCLC (25), either chemo-naïve (20) or pretreated (24) received CDDP 40 mg/m2, PTX 85 mg/m2 (one-hour infusion) and escalating TPT doses (starting from 0.75 mg/m2) in a 30-min infusion in weekly administration. Filgrastim 5 mg/kg was administered on days 3 to 5 of each week. RESULTS: Eight different dose levels were tested for a total of 295 delivered cycles. The dose escalation was interrupted at the TPT dose of 2.50 mg/m2. No toxic deaths occurred in this study. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 15 patients (36 cycles), seven patients (15 cycles), and four patients (five cycles), respectively. Severe vomiting and diarrhoea occurred in seven and four patients. Peripheral neuropathy was recorded in 11 patients (42 cycles), but it was never severe. An overall 11 of 19 (58%) OC and 11 of 25 (44%) SCLC patients obtained objective responses. Eight patients showed complete responses (three OC and three SCLC). Among the 20 chemo-naïve patients, 9 of 11 (82%) OC and seven of nine (78%) SCLC responded. CONCLUSIONS: The CDDP/TPT/PTX weekly administration with filgrastim support represents a well-tolerated and active therapeutic approach in both chemo-naïve and pretreated OC and SCLC patients. A weekly dose of TPT of 2.25 mg/m2 is recommended for the phase II study.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Daily times four vinorelbine plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of a novel schedule.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel multiday schedule of vinorelbine and displatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled, including 27 patients with stage IV disease, and 11 patients with performance status of 2. They received a maximum of four chemotherapy cycles with cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2/day intravenously (i.v.) for four consecutive days, every three weeks, with prophylactic filgrastim. RESULTS: Sixteen patients responded (53%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 34%-72%), including two complete and fourteen partial confirmed responses. Median survival for all patients was 8.1 months, with actuarial one-year and two-year survival rates of 40% and 15%. Despite prophylactic filgrastim, the delivered vinorelbine dose intensity of 16.8 mg/m2/week caused febrile neutropenia in 48% of patients (16% of cycles), resulting in one treatment-related death. Common nonhematologic toxicities included delayed emesis, asthenia, and constipation. CONCLUSIONS: This multiday vinorelbine-cisplatin schedule is highly active against advanced NSCLC but results in frequent neutropenic complications. The myelotoxicity and antitumor efficacy of vinorelbine in NSCLC patients may be schedule-dependent.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Intensification of chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumours: feasibility of a 3-fold increase in dose intensity with peripheral blood progenitor cells and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Dose intensity may be an important determinant of the outcome in cancer chemotherapy, but is often limited by cumulative haematological toxicity. The availability of haematopoietic growth factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation has allowed the development of a new treatment strategy in which several courses of high-dose combination chemotherapy are administered for the treatment of solid tumours. PBPCs were mobilised before chemotherapy using 12 or 30 micrograms kg-1 day-1 G-CSF (Filgrastim) for 10 days, and were collected by 2-5 leucaphereses. The yields of mononuclear cells, colony-forming units and CD34-positive cells were similar at the two dose levels of Filgrastim, and the numbers of PBPCs were sufficient for rescue following multiple cycles of chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 2.5 g m-2 for 2 days, etoposide 300 mg m-2 for 3 days and cisplatin 50 mg m-2 for 3 days) was administered sequentially for a median of three cycles (range 1-4) to ten patients. Following the 30 evaluable cycles, the median duration of leucopenia < or = 0.5 x 10(9) l-1 and < or = 1.0 x 10(9) l-1 was 7 and 8 days respectively. The median time of thrombopenia < or = 20 x 10(9) l-1 was 6 days. There was no cumulative haematological toxicity. The duration of leucopenia, but not of thrombopenia, was inversely related to the number of reinfused CFU-GM (granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units). In the majority of patients, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity became dose limiting after three cycles of therapy. However, the average dose intensity delivered was about three times higher than in a standard regimen. The complete response rate in patients with small-cell lung cancers was 66% (95% CI 30-92%) and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13 months and 17 months respectively. These results are encouraging and should be compared, in a randomised fashion, with standard dose chemotherapy.

Adult↗