Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Estramustine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources

Multidrug chemotherapy in the treatment of non-elderly patients with hormone-refractory prostatic carcinoma. A phase II study. North-Eastern Italian Oncology Group (GOCCNE).

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of a chemotherapy regimen including cisplatin, epirubicin, and estramustine phosphate was evaluated in a series of young patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: 28 patients with a histological diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma, age < 70 years, performance status (PS) < 2, hormone-refractory status, life expectancy > 3 months, were treated with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 i.v. and epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks for six cycles. Estramustine phosphate was administered at a dosage of 10 mg/kg p.o. in two divided daily doses during intravenous chemotherapy and until progression thereafter. The response was assessed after three cycles of chemotherapy, evaluating again the disease parameters. In case of partial remission or stable disease, treatment was continued for three additional cycles. The median age was 61.5 years, the median PS was 70. RESULTS: 11 partial remissions, 13 patients with stable disease, and 4 progressions were noted. The response rate (only partial remissions) was 39% (95% confidence limits 21-57%). The median duration of the partial remissions) was 11 (range 6-25) months. A subjective improvement of symptoms was observed in 17 of 19 patients. Toxicity was acceptable with no deaths. The median overall survival was 15 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination studied had activity in young prostate cancer patients, and our results suggest that this subset of patients needs specifically devised chemotherapy regimens.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

Estrogen mustard induces cell cycle arrest of human epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacologic disruption of microtubule function may provide effective therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, as has been observed in clinical trials using taxol. However, the limited availability of taxol and taxol's side effects emphasize a need to develop alternative antimicrotubule agents. Estramustine (EM) inhibits binding of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) to microtubules, promotes microtubule disassembly, disrupts spindle formation, and induces metaphase arrest in human prostate carcinoma and glioma cells in culture. We studied the effect of EM on DNA synthesis and on the cell cycle in four human ovarian carcinoma cell lines and examined the cell lines for evidence of MAP-like immunoreactivity. METHODS: The effect of EM on DNA synthesis and on the cell cycle was determined using [3H]thymidine incorporation assays and flow cytometry, respectively. Microtubule-associated protein-like immunoreactivity was determined using monoclonal antibodies directed against MAP 1A, MAP 1B, and MAP 2(2A + 2B) for Western analysis after sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: We demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibitory response to EM in BIXLER, DK2NMA, and SKOV3. BIX3 showed a dose-dependent inhibitory response to EM concentrations from 25 micrograms/mL to 100 micrograms/mL, but a stimulatory response at 10 micrograms/mL. Estramustine inhibited exponentially growing cells by causing mitotic arrest with subsequent accumulation of cells in G2/M phase of the cell cycle in all four cell lines. We found MAP 1A, MAP 1B, and MAP 2-like immunoreactivity in all four cells lines studied. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with a MAP-microtubule mechanism of action for EM in ovarian carcinoma cells and provide reason to conduct further study of EM for potential use in the treatment of human epithelial ovarian cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Which drug combination for hormone-refractory prostate cancer?

Patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer have a progressive disease with a median survival of approximately 11 months, and currently no treatment offers a survival advantage. The standard drug treatment is a corticosteroid and chemotherapy with mitoxantrone. In a comparison of docetaxel every 3 weeks and prednisone, versus mitoxantrone and prednisone, with a follow-up of approximately 21 months, there were less deaths in the docetaxel group than in the mitoxantrone group (166 of 335 patients and 201 of 337 patients, respectively). Docetaxel also prolonged the duration of survival compared with mitoxantrone (18.9 and 16.5 months, respectively). When given with prednisone, docetaxel was also shown to reduce pain and serum prostate specific antigen levels and improve quality of life compared with mitoxantrone/prednisone. In another trial in hormone-resistant prostate cancer patients, which compared docetaxel and estramustine with mitoxantrone and prednisone during a median follow-up of 32 months, there were fewer deaths with docetaxel/estramustine than with mitoxantrone/prednisone, which were 217 of 338 and 235 of 336 patients, respectively. Median survival was also longer in the docetaxel and estramustine group than in the mitoxantrone/prednisone group (17.5 and 15.6 months, respectively). In conclusion, two combinations (docetaxel/prednisone and docetaxel/estramustine) have been shown to be superior to mitoxantrone/prednisone in hormone-refractory prostate cancer and both should be considered for use. With the present information, there is little to distinguish between these combinations.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Intracavitary irradiation of prostatic carcinoma by a high dose-rate afterloading technique.

A high dose-rate (60Co) afterloading technique was evaluated in a series of 73 patients with prostatic carcinoma stages I-IV. The intraurethral irradiation was combined with external pelvic radiotherapy. A minimum total dose of 78 Gy was delivered to the target volume. In a subgroup of patients estramustine (Estracyt) was given as adjuvant chemohormonal therapy during irradiation. The median follow-up for the whole group was 63 months. The crude 5-year survival rate was 60% and the corrected survival rate 90%. Survival was related to the tumor grade. Local pelvic recurrences were recorded in 17.8%. 'Viable cells' in posttherapy aspiration biopsy were not associated with tumor recurrences or survival. Four patients (5%) had grade 3 late radiation reactions with urethral stricture or bladder fibrosis. Urinary tract infections and prior transurethral resections were not associated with a higher frequency of reactions. Concurrent estramustine therapy seemed to increase the frequency of both acute and chronic radiation reactions. Local control, recurrence, and survival were not affected by chemohormonal therapy. The use of tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound as aids to computerized dosimetry may improve local dose distribution and reduce the irradiated volume.

Brachytherapy↗

Thalidomide/estramustine/paclitaxel in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This is a phase I/II trial of thalidomide with estramustine and paclitaxel in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) who underwent previous chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with progressive AIPC were treated with oral thalidomide (200 mg, 400 mg, or 600 mg daily), intravenous paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 over 3 hours on days 3 and 10), and oral estramustine (140 mg 3 times daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12) every 21 days. RESULTS: Phase I: first cycle dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 0 of 3 patients at 200 mg thalidomide daily, 0 of 3 at 400 mg daily, and 1 of 3 at 600 mg daily (the designated maximum tolerated dose). Phase II: twenty-nine of 38 evaluable patients (76%; 95% confidence interval, 67%-87%) experienced a 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen level. Five of 18 patients (28%) with measurable disease exhibited an objective response. Nine of 14 patients (64%) with disease refractory to previous taxane therapy had 50% decreases in prostate-specific antigen level. Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (9 of 39 [23%]), fatigue (9 of 39 [23%]), dyspnea (8 of 39 [21%]), and thromboembolic events (7 of 39 [18%]). Cumulative dose-limiting toxicity rates were minimal (13%) with thalidomide at 200 mg daily. CONCLUSION: The profile of activity of thalidomide/paclitaxel/estramustine in taxane-refractory AIPC warrants further investigation.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Comparative antitumor effects of hormonal ablation, estrogen agonist, estrogen cytotoxic derivative, and antiestrogen in the PAIII rat prostatic adenocarcinoma.

The effects of hormonal ablation, estrogen, estrogen-derived cytotoxic agent, and estrogen antagonist therapies used clinically were evaluated on in vitro colony formation, in vivo growth, and lymphatic and pulmonary metastasis of the PAIII tumor. Ventral prostatic and seminal vesicle weights were evaluated in the same animals to assess androgen-related responses. Estradiol, estramustine phosphate, and testosterone had no effects on PAIII colony formation in vitro. Castration, hypophysectomy, estradiol benzoate, and estramustine phosphate treatment of PAIII-bearing Lobund Wistar rats produced significant (P less than 0.05) regression of male accessory sex organs. Of these treatments, only hypophysectomy had significant (P less than 0.05) inhibitory effects on primary PAIII growth and lymphatic and pulmonary metastasis. LY117018 [6-hydroxy-2-(p-hydroxyphenyl)benzo(b)thien-3-yl-p-2-(l-pyrrolidin yl)ethoxy phenyl ketone] has antiestrogenic activity but produces no significant agonist responses. LY117018 had no effect upon PAIII colony formation in vitro. Following s.c. implantation of PAIII cells, LY117018 (2.0, 10.0, or 20.0 mg/kg s.c.) had no effect on primary tumor growth in the tail. In vitro LY117018 administration produced marked antimetastatic effects. In a dose-dependent manner, LY117018 inhibited PAIII metastasis to the gluteal (97%) and iliac lymph nodes (88%) (P less than 0.05 for both). LY117018 also maximally inhibited pulmonary metastasis by 86% (P less than 0.05). Maximal regression of 42% for ventral prostatic and 35% for seminal vesicle weights were also seen after LY117018 administration (P less than 0.05 for both). Co-administration of estradiol benzoate had no antagonistic effect upon the antitumor responses produced by LY117018. The mechanism of action of LY117018 is not known. The failure of estradiol benzoate to affect PAIII growth and metastasis supports the contention that the responses to LY117018 are not attributable to simple antagonism of estrogen action. LY117018 may be exerting its antitumor effects through autocrine, paracrine, or endocrine mechanisms. LY117018 represents a class of agents with potential utility in treating metastatic cancer of the prostate.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Doxetaxel: new indication. Prostate cancer: a few more weeks.

(1) The standard treatment for metastatic prostate cancer is hormone therapy, based on medical castration (with an LH-RH agonist) or surgical castration (pulpectomy), possibly combined with an androgen antagonist. For patients with hormone-resistant disease the only cytotoxic agents approved in France, estramustine and mitoxantrone, have no proven impact on survival. (2) Docetaxel is now approved in Europe for the treatment of hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer, in combination with a steroid. (3) In an open-label comparative trial involving 1006 patients, docetaxel infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, in combination with prednisone (or prednisolone), significantly extended the median survival time by about 2.5 months as compared with a mitoxantrone-prednisone combination (18.9 versus 16.5 months). In another open-label comparative trial involving 674 patients, a combination of docetaxel + estramustine was significantly more effective than a mitoxantrone + prednisone combination in extending median survival time (17.5 versus 15.6 months). (4) The adverse effects of docetaxel + prednisone were the same as those seen with other indications (hair loss, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, neutropenia, nail disorders, neuropathies), and were severe in 25% of patients. (5) In France the cost of docetaxel therapy for hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer is more than 1000 euros every three weeks. (6) In practice, docetaxel is the first cytotoxic agent shown to prolong survival in men with hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. The benefit is limited, however, especially given the potentially severe adverse effects of docetaxel, which must be disclosed to patients.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

[Prostate-specific antigen as an evaluation method in the treatment of hormone-refractory cancer of the prostate].

Out of 62 patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer, 34 received rescue treatment with estramustine phosphate and 28 received non-steroidal symptomatic treatment. All patients undergoing symptomatic treatment experienced increased PSA levels while in 16 (47%) patients treated with estramustine phosphate, PSA decreased between 13-96%. In 11 cases (32.3%) the decline in PSA was higher than 50%. In 5 (14.7%) the decline was lower than 50% and in 18 cases (53%) PSA levels were increased. SCR rate was 82%, 60% and 6% respectively while OCR were 36.4%., 0% and 0% respectively. No clinical response was seen in patients undergoing symptomatic treatment. A decline in PSA levels higher than 50% 12 weeks after treatment appears to be a "good prognosis" factor related to the best clinical response rates and survival.

Estramustine↗

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced hormone-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate after hormonal manipulation has been noted to be a relatively chemotherapeutic nonresponsive tumor. Earlier reviews have reported objective responses, that is, complete and partial remissions in 6.5% of 3184 patients, and the current review examines the efficacy of new agents. METHODS: The current review consists of 26 new drug trials culled from papers and abstracts published between 1987-1991. RESULTS: Results of these 26 drug trials found a similar trend, 8.7% (95% confidence interval, 6.4-9.0%), indicating that hormone-resistant adenocarcinoma of the prostate still fails to respond to most cytotoxic agents. The most interesting of the new therapeutic agents is the combination of vinblastine plus estramustine. Only six agents had an objective response rate greater than 10%, such as vinblastine by continuous infusion, trimetrexate, mitoguazone, and estramustine. The recent introduction of radioactive-labeled monoclonal antibodies is intriguing and these will undoubtably be used as carriers for radiotherapeutic and cytotoxic compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Although multidrug resistance may explain the marginal efficacy of cytotoxic drugs, methods to overcome such resistance and, more importantly, new classes of agents must be developed. In addition, reliable disease markers must be found for osseous and visceral metastases to avoid the prevailing confusion in evaluating more precisely the destruction of prostate cancer cells.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer mainly affects elderly men, and its incidence has steadily increased over the last decade. The management of this disease is replete with controversy. In men with advanced, metastatic prostate cancer, hormone therapy is almost universally accepted as the initial treatment of choice and produces good responses in most patients. However, many patients will relapse and become resistant to further hormone manipulation; the outlook for these patients is poor. Many have disease extending to the skeleton, which is associated with severe pain. Therapies for these men include chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, palliative radiotherapy, and radioisotopes. Systemic chemotherapy has been evaluated in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) for many years, with disappointing results. However, more recent studies with newer agents have shown encouraging results. There is therefore a need to explore the value of chemotherapy in this disease. OBJECTIVES: The present review aims to assess the role of chemotherapy in men with metastatic HRPC. The major outcome was overall survival. Secondary objectives include the effect of chemotherapy on pain relief, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, quality of life, and treatment-related toxicity. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified by searching electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, and handsearching of relevant journals and conference proceedings. There was no restriction of language or location. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only published randomised trials of chemotherapy in HRPC patients were eligible for inclusion in this review. Randomised comparisons of different chemotherapeutic regimens, chemotherapy versus best standard of care or placebo, were relevant to this review. Randomised, dose-escalation studies were not included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction tables were designed specifically for this review to aid data collection. Data from relevant studies were extracted and included information on trial design, participants, and outcomes. Trial quality was also assessed using a scoring system for randomisation, blinding, and description of patient withdrawal. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 107 randomised trials of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer identified by the search strategy, 47 were included in this review and represented 6929 patients with HRPC. Only two trials compared the same chemotherapeutic interventions and therefore a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate. The quality of some trials was poor because of poor reporting, low-patient recruitment, or poor trial design. For clarity, trials were categorised according to the major drug used, but this was not a definitive grouping, since many trials used several agents and would be eligible for inclusion in a number of categories. Drug categories included estramustine, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, and docetaxel. Only studies using docetaxel reported a significant improvement in overall survival compared to best standard of care, although the increase was small (< 2.5 months). The mean percentage of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in PSA compared to baseline was as follows: estramustine 48%; 5-fluorouracil 20%; doxorubicin 50% (one study only); mitoxantrone 33%; and docetaxel 52%. Pain relief was reported in 35% to 76% of patients receiving either single agents or combination regimens. A three weekly regime of docetaxel significantly improved pain relief compared to mitoxantrone plus prednisone (the latter regimen approved as standard therapy for HRPC in the USA). All chemotherapeutics, either as single agents or in combination, were associated with toxicity; the major ones being myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, cardiac toxicity, neuropathy, and alopecia. Quality of life was significantly improved with docetaxel compared to mitoxantrone plus prednisone. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HRPC have not traditionally been offered chemotherapy as a routine treatment because of treatment-related toxicity and poor responses. Recent data from randomised studies, in particular those using docetaxel, have provided encouraging improvements in overall survival, palliation of symptoms, and improvements in quality of life. Chemotherapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with HRPC. However, patients should make an informed decision based on the risks and benefits of chemotherapy.

Aged↗

Phase II trial evaluating a docetaxel-capecitabine combination as treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is a well-recognized drug in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), either alone or combined with estramustine. In this indication, a Phase II trial was conducted investigating a docetaxel-capecitabine combination. METHODS: Forty-six patients presenting with documented HRPC were enrolled in the study. The treatment regimen consisted of docetaxel (D) at a dose of 35 mg /m2/week (intravenously, 3 consecutive weeks) plus oral capecitabine (C) at a dose of 625 mg/m2 twice daily (Days 5-18) every 28 days for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was the biological response defined as a reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level > or =50%. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty of 44 assessable patients (68.2%) achieved a biological response, 14 of whom (31.8%) normalized their PSA value. The median overall survival time was 17.7 months (95% confidence interval, 15.8 to not reached). Four treatment cycles were completed by 87% of the patients. Hematologic toxicity was mild. The main Grade 3-4 toxicities were cutaneous toxicity (13.1%) and changes in nails (6.5%). Physical functioning and role scales were higher before treatment (P = .02 and P = .003, respectively), fatigue and diarrhea were more frequent during and after treatment (P = .0003 and P = .03, respectively), and pain was lower during and after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrated the high efficacy of the DC combination in patients with HRPC, and the associated good tolerability. This combination offers a new alternative to the docetaxel-estramustine combination. Further randomized trials are warranted.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Is there a role for platinum chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer?

Docetaxel chemotherapy is the current standard of care for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Platinum chemotherapy drugs, such as cisplatin and carboplatin, have moderate single-agent activity in HRPC. Next-generation platinum drugs, including satraplatin and oxaliplatin, may have additional activity in the management of HRPC. Furthermore, neuroendocrine differentiation may play a role in disease progression, providing a rationale for platinum-based chemotherapy in the management of HRPC. The authors reviewed the MEDLINE database for reports related to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer and evaluated studies that reviewed the role of neuroendocrine differentiation in the progression of HRPC. Older studies from the 1970s and 1980s suggested a lack of activity of cisplatin and carboplatin; however, those studies were flawed at least in part by their methods of response assessment. More recent Phase II studies of carboplatin suggested a moderate level of clinical and palliative activity when it was used as a single agent. However, when carboplatin was combined with a taxane and estramustine, high response rates were observed in several recent clinical trials. In addition, a randomized trial suggested that satraplatin plus prednisone improved progression-free survival compared with prednisone alone. For patients who progressed after docetaxel, no standard options existed in the literature that was reviewed. Several preliminary reports suggested that carboplatin and oxaliplatin may have activity as second-line chemotherapy. Platinum chemotherapy drugs historically have been considered inactive in HRPC, although a review of the data suggested otherwise. Carboplatin, in particular, induced very high response rates when it was combined with estramustine and a taxane, but it also appeared to have activity in patients who progressed after docetaxel. Satraplatin plus prednisone is being investigated in a large Phase III trial as second-line chemotherapy for HRPC. Targeting neuroendocrine cells may provide a new therapeutic approach to HRPC.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Experiences with doxo/epirubicin and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in prostatic cancer.

Maximal androgen blockade (MAB) has been reported to prolong the time to progression and the duration of survival in metastatic prostatic cancer. The addition of epirubicin to MAB in such patients seems to improve the therapeutic results further. The beneficial effect of combining castration with epirubicin in metastatic cases appears questionable. In comparing the time to progression in patients treated with MAB +/- epirubicin versus castration +/- epirubicin or estramustine, many studies reveal similar figures. Whether the results after treatment are actually improved remains controversial. In hormone-refractory cases, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) alone seems superior to estramustine or prednisolone treatment. Combining MPA and epirubicin improves the results, but even if the improvement is of clinical value, it is nonetheless of limited magnitude.

Administration, Oral↗

Recent strategies for the use of paclitaxel in the treatment of urological malignancies.

Paclitaxel, a natural anticancer drug, has gained widespread acceptance as an active broad-spectrum antitumor agent, including its use in urological malignancies, particularly urothelial tract cancer and testicular cancer. The mechanism of action, based on the premature stabilization of the microtubule assembly with disruption of the cytoskeletal framework, is completely different from those of DNA-damaging agents, e.g., cisplatin and ifosfamide. As a single agent, paclitaxel is one of the most active drugs in metastatic bladder cancer, with an overall response rate of 40-50% being obtained in previously untreated patients. These promising single-agent results have prompted the use of combination regimens including, in particular, cisplatin and paclitaxel. A high degree of activity for the cisplatin-paclitaxel combination as reflected by responses in 50-80% of patients, including a substantial number of complete responses (> 30%), has been identified. The role of other agents such as vinorelbine, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, or ifosfamide as additions to this two-drug combination currently remains open. The combination of paclitaxel plus ifosfamide or vinorelbine in the absence of a platinum derivative has yielded rather disappointing results. Of particular interest may be the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin. Both drugs can be given to patients with impaired renal function. Overall response rates of 45-60% have been reported in phase II studies. The so-called platelet-sparing effect of paclitaxel given in combination with carboplatin has resulted in a surprisingly low frequency of myelotoxicity, particularly thrombocytopenia. The combination of paclitaxel with carboplatin is being compared in an ongoing trial against the current standard MVAC regimen (methotrexate/vinblastine/Adriamycin/cisplatin) in patients with metastatic disease. Furthermore, the activity of paclitaxel-based combinations is currently being explored in the neoadjuvant setting in phase II studies, and the potential for the combination with the other new promising agent--gemcitabine--will be evaluated in a phase I setting. In prostate cancer, estramustine phosphate is widely used as palliative treatment for patients with hormone-refractory disease. In vitro synergistic activity has been observed between estramustine and paclitaxel in prostate-cancer cell lines, although paclitaxel has not demonstrated single-agent activity in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. In clinical trials the combination of the two agents was associated with increased gastrointestinal toxicity. The addition of etoposide as a third drug has yielded prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-response rates of > 50%, but data on quality of life and survival time have not been reported for these combinations. A true clinical role for paclitaxel in prostate cancer has therefore not been established. Paclitaxel has finally demonstrated single-agent activity in relapsed and/or cisplatin-refractory testicular cancer in recent phase II trials, indicating different mechanisms of resistance to cisplatin and paclitaxel. These results have formed the rationale for the introduction of paclitaxel as part of combination chemotherapy regimens in patients with relapsed but chemosensitive testicular cancer. Preliminary results demonstrate that paclitaxel can be safely included into these conventional-dose combination regimens. When it is used prior to high-dose chemotherapy, sufficient numbers of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for high-dose therapy can be collected. The final role of paclitaxel in risk-adapted chemotherapeutic strategies in testicular cancer is not defined, but it appears that paclitaxel-based combinations can achieve a substantial response rate in patients with relapsed disease.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer: results of new clinical trials and future studies.

Our understanding of the role of chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer has improved considerably in 2004 with the publication of two large randomized phase III trials and the approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of docetaxel and prednisone for metastatic hormone-refractory disease. Although treatment is still considered palliative in nature, studies of chemotherapy for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) have demonstrated improved overall survival compared with older regimens as well as clinically significant improvements in important endpoints, such as quality of life and time to progression. In particular, docetaxel has emerged as first-line therapy on an every-3-week schedule for metastatic HRPC, replacing mitoxantrone, as recently reported in the TAX327 trial. Docetaxel and estramustine combinations have the disadvantage of significant cardiovascular and gastrointestinal toxicity, and further use of estramustine is likely unwarranted as first-line therapy. Future trials examining novel biologic agents and combination therapies should use single-agent docetaxel as the reference standard. The role of chemotherapy for advanced disease in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, in biochemically (PSA) relapsed patients, and as second-line therapy for relapsed disease, remains a subject of active clinical investigation.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Recent advances in chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer.

Recently, several important studies have validated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a reliable measure of response to chemotherapeutic treatment in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Furthermore, although chemotherapy in this setting has always been considered palliative, several analyses of recent clinical trials have demonstrated a significant association between declines in PSA values of 50% or more and prolonged survival. Mitoxantrone, in combination with prednisone, has been shown to provide significant palliation and improved quality of life. The use of combinations of chemotheraputic agents also seems to provide significantly superior objective and subjective responses compared with single-agent regimens. In particular, estramustine has been shown to synergize many of the agents used in prostate cancer treatment and has been demonstrated to provide significant palliation and decline in PSA levels in combination with vinblastine, vinorelbine, etoposide, paclitaxel, and docetaxel. The results of several important trials of the taxanes both as single agents and in combination with estramustine have been completed in the past year and have demonstrated that these agents are very effective in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Chemotherapy agents and timing of chemotherapy in prostate cancer management.

In 2005, it is estimated that more than 30,000 men will die from metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. For decades, no chemotherapeutic agent demonstrated a survival benefit in these patients, although two randomized clinical trials demonstrated a clear palliative benefit using mitoxantrone combined with a corticosteroid. However, beginning in 1999, a series of phase-2 trials were performed using docetaxel, either as a single agent or in combination with estramustine. Preliminary data implied a survival improvement, with median survivals reported to be 14 to 23 months. Prostate-specific antigen levels dropped by more than 50% in 38% to 48% of patients treated with docetaxel. These findings were confirmed in two phase-3 randomized trials in which docetaxel with and without estramustine have demonstrated a survival benefit using chemotherapy in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Chemotherapy for advanced hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Men with metastatic prostate cancer treated with androgen ablation respond rapidly and often dramatically to therapy, with improvement of bone pain, regression of soft tissue metastases, and declines in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Unfortunately, few treatment options are available to men who progress after hormone therapy. Recent studies in the mechanism of anticancer drug action have focused on the proteins that regulate apoptosis or programmed cell death as a target for the treatment of hormone-resistant prostate cancer. New treatments are now being designed with both resistance and apoptotic pathways in mind. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the combination of mitoxantrone and prednisone for the palliation of bone pain in men with hormone refractory prostate cancer demonstrates that chemotherapy can be effective. Two randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of mitoxantrone combined with a corticosteroid over corticosteroid therapy in alleviating bone pain. The combination of estramustine with vinblastine, or VP-16, is commonly used in clinical practice with both regimens demonstrating significant PSA declines. When estramustine is combined with either paclitaxel or docetaxel in vitro, greater than additive in vitro cytotoxicity is noted. Phase I and II studies of taxane-based therapy in hormone refractory prostate cancer demonstrate improved survival when compared with historical controls, but phase III studies are necessary to confirm these preliminary observations.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗