Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ENDOSCOPY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Standardization of the endoscopic report is a key issue for future research in the field of digestive endoscopy. The Minimal Standard Terminology (MST) has been proposed by the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) as a structured language for production of computerized endoscopic reports. The aim of this study was to validate version 1.0 of this terminology prospectively, by collecting cases in a multicenter, multilingual trial. METHODS: Endoscopic cases (esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD], colonoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]) were prospectively collected in nine university hospitals in Europe, using the same software. Reports were produced in the local language, but the software allowed comparison of reports between languages, and global analysis of the database. Outcome measures were the adequacy of terms proposed in the MST to describe "reasons for performing an endoscopy", "findings", and "endoscopic diagnoses", frequency of use and content of free-text fields, and types of lesions described. RESULTS: A total of 6,232 reports were analyzed, including 3,447 gastroscopies, 1,743 colonoscopies, and 1,042 ERCPs. Overall, terms originally contained in the MST were adequate to describe fully 91.0% of all examinations where "reasons for endoscopy" were described, 99.5 % of examinations where "findings" were described, 95.8% of all examinations containing descriptions of "endoscopic diagnosis", 98.9% of examinations containing descriptions of "additional diagnostic procedures", and 94.8 % of examinations containing descriptions of "additional therapeutic procedures". Free-text fields were only used in the other cases (less than 5% of cases in average). CONCLUSIONS: The MST appeared adequate to cover a large part of routine endoscopy reports, and could thus be used as a tool for standardization of endoscopic reports in clinical practice. The latter could be significantly improved by the use of a structured and standardized terminology for the production of endoscopic reports.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2002

Differences in the diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in dyspeptic patients receiving proton-pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients attending for diagnostic oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) for dyspeptic symptoms are often receiving acid-suppression therapy that has not been discontinued prior to endoscopy, and this may reduce the diagnostic yield of endoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of OGD in uncomplicated dyspepsia in patients receiving no medication, those receiving acid-suppression therapy, and those receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the time of endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 6825 diagnostic OGDs performed in our unit between 1993 and 2001 were analysed. Patients were excluded if they had sinister symptoms, were receiving NSAIDs, or were undergoing repeat or surveillance endoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 4233 OGDs (62 %) fulfilled the criteria for uncomplicated dyspepsia. Of the patients examined in these procedures, 1367 (32 %) were receiving acid-suppression therapy. A total of 724 patients (53 % of those on therapy) were receiving proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), 393 of whom (54 %) had positive endoscopic findings (oesophagitis 31 %, gastritis 16 %, duodenal ulcer/duodenitis 16 %). A total of 643 (47 % of the patients on therapy) were receiving H 2 -receptor antagonists, 443 of whom (69 % of this group) had positive endoscopic findings (oesophagitis 30 %, gastritis 21 %, duodenal ulcer/duodenitis 31 %). A total of 2866 patients were not receiving acid-suppression therapy, 1805 of whom (63 %) had endoscopic findings (oesophagitis 37 %, gastritis 14 %, duodenal ulcer/duodenitis 24 %). The endoscopic yield was significantly lowest in the PPI group, except for the diagnosis of oesophagitis. Overall, 17 carcinomas were detected in patients referred with simple dyspepsia, and in five of these cases the patients were receiving acid suppression. CONCLUSIONS: The widespread use of acid suppression in the treatment of simple dyspepsia prior to endoscopy leads to a reduction in the endoscopic recognition of mucosal lesions caused by acid-peptic disease, but not to a high healing rate for these lesions, and it may mask malignancy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Locally advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma missed primarily by capsule endoscopy but diagnosed by push enteroscopy.

Wireless-capsule-endoscopy is a new painless method that is able both to visualize the entire small bowel and to detect even small lesions. We report here the case of a patient in whom a locally advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma was initially missed on capsule endoscopy, but was diagnosed by subsequent push enteroscopy. Capsule endoscopy was carried out in a 47-year-old patient with a history of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, iron-deficiency anemia, and a lack of symptoms suggestive of stenosis. The capsule imaging revealed angiodysplasias in the jejunum, but no other abnormalities. Push enteroscopy was carried out to allow argon plasma coagulation treatment of the angiodysplasias that had been detected; it revealed a polypoid tumor 20 mm in diameter at 150 cm from the incisors, with the capsule endoscope still located proximal to the tumor and with its optical dome turned towards the push enteroscope. Clinical staging and subsequent surgical resection showed a locally advanced adenocarcinoma (pT4, pN0 (0/7), pMx, G3).[nl]Small-bowel tumors within the reach of push enteroscopy may be missed by capsule endoscopy. Although wireless capsule endoscopy is a major advance in the investigation of the small bowel, well-designed clinical studies still need to define the precise algorithm for diagnostic work-up of suspected small-bowel diseases.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Small bowel endoscopy.

Video capsule endoscopy continues to be the major focus in papers dealing with diagnostic small-bowel endoscopy. Although capsule endoscopy is used for a variety of indications, its major field of application is still obscure bleeding from the small intestine, where it can be regarded as a first-line test. There is increasing evidence that capsule endoscopy for suspected Crohn's disease may be diagnostic in individual cases after inconclusive conventional tests. Push enteroscopy is the clinical reality for biopsy and treatment in the proximal small bowel, whereas intraoperative enteroscopy is used for distal or diffuse small-intestinal disorders. Further reports on double-balloon enteroscopy suggest that this method may be able to replace at least intraoperative enteroscopy in many circumstances. The availability of specific antibody tests for celiac disease is leading to recurrent interest in endoscopy and histology, showing that villous atrophy and lymphocytic infiltrates are typical, but not specific, findings.

Capsules↗
PubMed2005

Video capsule endoscopy for investigation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: feasibility, results, and interobserver agreement.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility, diagnostic yield, and interobserver agreement of capsule endoscopy in the investigation of patients with obscure or occult gastrointestinal bleeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 64 consecutive patients with occult bleeding (31 %) or overt bleeding (69 %) were assessed using capsule endoscopy after negative upper and lower endoscopy and small-bowel radiology. The quality of visualization of the small-bowel mucosa was scored from 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Thirty video capsule recordings with normal or abnormal findings were blindly assessed by four independent endoscopists. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using the kappa index. RESULTS: The small bowel was completely visualized in 57/64 patients (89 %). Incomplete small-bowel transit was most commonly due to prolonged gastric retention (five patients). The mucosa visualization scores (means) for the proximal, middle, and distal thirds of the small bowel were 3.7, 3.3, and 2.2 respectively. Visualization of the distal ileum was good (> or = 3) in 38 % and a bleeding site was found in 45 % of patients. Push-enteroscopy was also performed in 56 patients. The results of the two techniques were similar in 37 patients, capsule endoscopy was superior in 12 patients, and push-enteroscopy was superior in seven patients. Interobserver agreement was good for bleeding and for angiodysplasia, but poor for ulcers and tumors. Mean interobserver agreement was better among experienced endoscopists than among junior endoscopists. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy allowed the whole small intestine to be explored in 89 % of patients, with good visualization of the mucosa, except distally. Interobserver agreement was better among the experienced endoscopists and was better for red-colored abnormalities (bleeding and angiodysplasia) than for ulcers and tumors.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Effects of capsule endoscopy on cardiac pacemakers.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Capsule endoscopy is a new, noninvasive diagnostic technique which enables visualization of the mucosa of the small intestine in physiological conditions and without the need to subject the patient to external radiation. Wireless capsule video endoscopy is contraindicated in patients with a cardiac pacemaker. However, on the basis of the characteristics of the radiofrequency band used by the endoscopic capsule, together with a series of other factors, it is possible that the patient's use of a pacemaker should not be a contraindication to capsule endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This work had two phases: an in vitro study, using an interference detector, and an in vivo study involving 20 patients with cardiac pacemakers who showed symptoms or signs that justified a capsule endoscopy investigation. RESULTS: No interference was observed during the first, in vitro, phase of the study. In the second phase, patients wore a Holter recorder for a mean time of 10 hours, during which the average number of recorded QRS complexes exceeded 30,000. All the pacemakers functioned normally. Interference due only to myopotentials was detected in a single patient in whom modification of the pacemaker programming was necessary. In the other 19 patients, neither sensing nor stimulation failures were observed. CONCLUSIONS: No interference between the pacemaker and the endoscopic capsule was observed. All the pacemakers functioned normally, and no increased incidence of adverse effects was observed. Neither was any pacemaker-induced interference observed on the capsule endoscopy images.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Esophageal capsule endoscopy versus esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating portal hypertension: a prospective comparative study of performance and tolerance.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the most effective method for examining the upper gastrointestinal tract, and particularly for evaluating portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients, especially for screening purposes. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, accuracy, and tolerance of PillCam ESO capsule endoscopy for this indication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, unsedated EGD and capsule endoscopy examinations were conducted on the same day in cirrhotic patients at the time of diagnosis. The patients quantified the tolerability (relative to pain, nausea, choking sensations, etc.) of the two procedures using a 100-mm visual analogue scale. The time required for the recording and for diagnosis with the capsule examination were documented, as were the patients' preferences in comparison with EGD. Two independent endoscopists blinded to the EGD diagnoses assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the images obtained. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included in the study (mean age 62, mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score 10.5, mean Child-Pugh score 7.3). The procedure was safe. One patient was unable to swallow the capsule. The mean recording time was 213 s (range 6 - 1200 s); the procedure accurately assessed the presence or absence of esophageal varices in 16 of 19 patients (84.2 %); and it correctly indicated a need for primary prophylaxis (esophageal varices of grade 2 or more and/or red signs) in 100 % of cases. The tolerability of the capsule endoscopy examination was significantly better, and all of the patients preferred capsule endoscopy to EGD (which was transnasal in 11 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy was feasible, safe, accurate, highly acceptable, and preferred by cirrhotic patients undergoing screening for portal hypertension. This new technique requires further and more extensive evaluation, as well as assessment of its cost-effectiveness.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Accuracy of laryngeal examination during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for premalignancy screening: prospective study in patients with and without reflux symptoms.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease may be associated with laryngeal damage caused by reflux material. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of laryngeal examinations during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as a method of screening for major laryngeal injury in a series of patients with reflux symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients with reflux symptoms and 100 control individuals underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with standard or high-resolution magnifying video endoscopes. Any laryngeal abnormalities were initially identified by the gastroenterologist before the scope was inserted into the esophagus. All of the examinations were recorded on video and subsequently reevaluated by an otorhinolaryngologist. All of the patients underwent standard laryngoscopy as a reference procedure. RESULTS: All of the patients completed the study. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the preliminary laryngeal exploration for detecting laryngeal abnormalities (such as laryngitis and vocal leukoplakia) were 90%, 90%, 92%, and 89%, respectively. High-resolution magnifying endoscopy had a higher sensitivity and specificity than standard endoscopy for detecting laryngeal pathology. Two patients were found to have laryngeal leukoplakia. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that preliminary diagnosis of laryngeal disorders can be accurately carried out by the gastroenterologist when patients are undergoing upper endoscopy for reflux symptoms. This approach could also be helpful for the timely diagnosis of major reflux-related laryngeal disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The yield of capsule endoscopy in patients with abdominal pain or diarrhea.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Capsule endoscopy, proven effective for evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected Crohn's disease, is increasingly used to investigate other small-intestine disorders, but its yield for other indications is not well known. We sought to evaluate its yield and findings for abdominal pain or diarrhea. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients with abdominal pain or diarrhea (> 6 weeks' duration) who underwent capsule endoscopy between August 2001 and June 2004 were retrospectively reviewed for demographic data, indications, findings, diagnoses, complications, and radiologic studies. All patients had previous endoscopic or radiologic examinations (colonoscopy, enteroscopy, upper endoscopy, small-bowel series, computed tomography enterography, or computed tomography) demonstrating no abnormalities sufficient for diagnosis. RESULTS: 64 patients (26 men; 38 women; mean age, 43 years; age range, 19 - 83 years) who met study criteria had 68 capsule endoscopy studies. Indications were abdominal pain (35 patients), diarrhea (14), or both (15). Complete small-bowel visualization with identification of the cecum was achieved in 81 %; yield of positive findings was 9 % (6 patients). By indications, the yield was 6 % for abdominal pain, 14 % for diarrhea, and 13 % for both. Diagnoses included Crohn's disease (3), enteropathy induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (2), and submucosal tumor (1). Capsule retention occurred in two patients, requiring surgical removal. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy had a low yield for evaluation of abdominal pain or diarrhea and cannot be recommended as a first-line test without further study. Nonetheless, it facilitated diagnosis in 9 % of patients with negative endoscopic and radiologic examinations.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1996

Pulse oximetry and supplemental oxygen during gastrointestinal endoscopy: a critical review.

A high proportion of the mortality and morbidity associated with endoscopic procedures may be of cardiopulmonary origin. For this reason, the appropriate degree of monitoring and prophylactic measures to be used in the sedated patient undergoing endoscopy has become a topic of discussion during recent years. The development of myocardial ischaemia during gastrointestinal endoscopy has traditionally been considered to be due to the simultaneous arterial hypoxaemia; however, recent investigations have suggested that tachycardia may be a more important pathogenic factor. No study has ever shown that pulse oximetry monitoring or supplemental oxygen will reduce the morbidity or mortality during gastrointestinal endoscopy. The current guidelines for monitoring and oxygen therapy are therefore not supported by scientific data. There is a need for further studies on the pathogenic mechanisms in myocardial ischaemia during endoscopy, and the influence of hypoxaemia on the outcome after upper and lower endoscopy should be clarified.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1995

Topical pharyngeal anesthesia improves tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized double-blind study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The usefulness of topical pharyngeal anesthesia is not well established. The aim of the present study was to determine its benefits in relation to patient tolerance and facilitation of the procedure in unsedated patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized double-blind study comparing Topicaina spray - a mixture of benzocaine butyl aminobenzoate (butoforme), amethocaine, and butacaine - and a placebo was carried out on 256 outpatients referred for diagnostic endoscopy. No additional premedication was used. After the examination, both the tolerance to and difficulty of the intubation and examination were evaluated by patients and endoscopists respectively, using visual analogue scales and a questionnaire. RESULTS: Three patients (1.2%) did not tolerate the endoscopy. One patient was excluded for unexpected therapeutic endoscopy. One hundred twenty-five patients received the active spray and 127 received the placebo. The two groups were similar with respect to patient characteristics. Both intubation and examination, assessed with visual analogue scales, were better tolerated (both p = 0.0001) and more easily performed (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0001 respectively) in the active treatment group. Patients receiving the active spray had a better tolerance for the procedure, according to questionnaire replies. CONCLUSIONS: Topical pharyngeal anesthesia in unsedated patients undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy improves tolerance and makes examination easier.

4-Aminobenzoic Acid↗
PubMed1994

Oxygen supplementation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparison of two methods.

The optimal method of oxygen supplementation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to compare oxygen supplementation via nasal prongs with that via a catheter passed into the low oropharynx to eliminate the effect of mouth breathing. Patients were stratified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of physical status into lower-risk (ASA 1 and 2) and higher-risk (ASA 3) groups. The lower-risk group received intranasal, intrapharyngeal, or no oxygen supplementation, and higher-risk patients received either intranasal or intrapharyngeal oxygen. Continuous arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) was recorded, using a pulse oximeter, before and during endoscopy. Critical desaturations (SpO2 < or = 90%), minimum SpO2 during endoscopy, and maximum desaturation from the baseline oxygen on air, were evaluated. There was no significant difference in the number of patients desaturating, minimum SpO2, or in the maximum desaturation from the baseline between the groups receiving intranasal or intrapharyngeal oxygen supplementation. In lower-risk patients receiving no supplementary oxygen (n = 27), ten patients (37%) desaturated, compared with one of 52 patients (2%) receiving supplementary oxygen (p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference between these groups in the minimum SpO2 (91% vs 97%, p < 0.001) and the maximum desaturation from the baseline (-5.2% vs +0.7%, p < 0.001) during endoscopy. We conclude that the intranasal and intrapharyngeal methods of oxygen supplementation are of similar efficacy, and that supplementary oxygen significantly decreases the incidence of critical arterial oxygen desaturation that occurs even in healthy patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1992

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate topical anaesthesia of the pharynx in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Reduction of discomfort during diagnostic upper endoscopy may not be desired by patients if the medication has long-lasting and severe after-effects. The present study was designed to examine whether topical anaesthesia of the pharynx without concomitant sedation is of overall benefit to patients undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy. Two hundred out-patients were randomized to receive in the form of a pharyngeal spray either 80-120 mg lidocaine or placebo. Patients assessed discomfort on a 100 mm visual analogue scale the day after examination. Patients undergoing endoscopy who received lidocaine spray experienced significantly less discomfort from the intubation (p = 0.0001), and discomfort induced by the rest of the examination was also reduced (p = 0.003). The outcome of the endoscopists' assessment was also in favour of lidocaine spray for intubation (p = 0.157) and ease of examination (p = 0.0014). The assessment of throat discomfort suffered by patients after endoscopy did not differ between the groups. A majority of patients, the same proportion in each group, stated they would prefer their next endoscopy to be performed with topical anaesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Operative endoscopy today.

Operative endoscopy permits therapeutic measures to be carried out that spare the patient major surgery. In its narrower sense, operative endoscopy was "inaugurated" with total biopsy of polyps. A complication occasionally seen with polyp-ectomies, namely haemorrhage, provided the impetus for developing endoscopic haemostasis using the laser beam and the electro-hydro probe. The possibility of cannulating the papilla of Vater and carrying out ERCP permitted the endoscopist not only to visualize concrements in the common bile duct, presenting as filling defects in the contrast material column-but also, when in a prepapillary location, to feel them with the tip of the catheter. The prepapillary concrement was, as it were, a sort of provocation for the diagnostic endoscopist. His response was to construct a simple papillotome, with the aid of which the roof of the papilla of Vater could be slit. In general, after papillotomy bile duct stones pass spontaneously, or can be extracted. In principle it is possible to destroy stones which cannot pass by employing pressure waves in the common bile duct induced by spark discharge in a liquid medium, or to reduce them in size by means of locally introduced dissolving agents. A relatively new branch of operative endoscopy involves interventions that might be described as prosthetic endoscopy. This includes the passing of plastic tubes down an oesophagus constricted by tumor growth, and the introduction of drainage tubes into the biliary system. Foreign body extraction, concerned primarily with swallowed objects located in the stomach, is an older but still very useful possibility of operative endoscopy.

Ampulla of Vater↗
PubMed1981

Early post-operative endoscopy of the operated intestine.

Endoscopy in the early post-operative stage after an intestinal operation is seldom indicated, in contrast to control endoscopy carried out at a later stage. Experiments with animals show that endoscopy of intestinal anastomoses may be performed as early as 24 hours after an operation, if carried out carefully by an experienced endoscopist. During this early post-operative period, endoscopy is indicated only when complications arise. The most important application is the endoscopic insertion of an intestinal tube in cases of post-operative ileus. However, coloscopic suction in meteorism of the colon, and the introduction of tubes through swollen anastomoses are also possible. Bleeding of an anastomosis in the early post-operative stage is rare, whereas bleeding due to teleangiectatic granulomas in the later post-operative stage is more common. Both cases are indications for endoscopic hemostasis. Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that intestinal endoscopy in the early post-operative stage should be carried out only in exceptional cases, and then only by an experienced surgical endoscopist.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

[Anxiety before gastrointestinal endoscopy--a significant problem?].

98 consecutive patients (40 men, 58 women; mean age 49 [17-83] years) who had been referred for outpatient gastroscopy or colonoscopy were questioned beforehand regarding their anxiety about the procedure, its causes and how it could be dispelled. Two thirds of them (67%) stated that they felt anxiety about the investigation; almost half of them (46%) felt very great or "terrible" anxiety. 55% of the patients had been fully informed about the nature of the procedure. 69% of the women and 48% of the men had previously experienced gastroscopy or colonoscopy. The reasons for their anxiety were varied. One quarter of those questioned (24%) had had unpleasant experiences during previous endoscopies; others had been alarmed by rumours about endoscopy (22%), and some were less worried about the procedure itself than about what it might reveal (24%). Almost two thirds (63%) wanted a tranquilizing injection. Other methods for dispelling anxiety, such as detailed information about the procedure (21%), a calm, relaxed atmosphere (19%) or the presence of a relative at the endoscopy (7%) were claimed for in a limited way. However, 37% very much wanted to watch the endoscopy on the television monitor. The findings show that the number of patients who experience anxiety before undergoing endoscopy is alarmingly great, and that more energetic measures are necessary to relieve their fears and worries.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

Routine early endoscopy in upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding: a randomized, controlled trial.

To determine whether routine early endoscopy is beneficial to patients with upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding that ceases during hospitalization, we randomly assigned 206 patients to routine endoscopy (100 patients) or no routine endoscopy (106). Patients in the latter group underwent endoscopy only if recurrent bleeding occurred during hospitalization or if x-ray films disclosed gastric ulcer or suggested neoplasia. All patients were initially treated with an empiric antacid regimen. When the two groups were compared (experimental versus control), there were no significant differences in overall hospital deaths (11 versus eight), recurrence of bleeding (33 versus 32), number of transfusions required to treat recurrent bleeding (mean +/- S.E.M., 7.4 +/- 1.2 versus 6.3 +/- 0.7 units), deaths after recurrent bleeding (eight versus five), or duration of hospital stay. During the 12 months after discharge, there were also no significant differences in frequency of readmission to the hospital, incidence of further gastrointestinal bleeding, number of hemorrhage-related deaths, or frequency of gastrointestinal surgery. We conclude that endoscopy should not be a routine procedure in patients with upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding that ceases during treatment.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2001

Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: A modified Group Health Association of America-9 survey (mGHAA-9) was recently proposed for measurement of patient satisfaction with endoscopy. It is unknown whether the mGHAA-9 addresses the issues most important to this outcome. METHODS: A 15-item survey of factors potentially important to patient satisfaction with endoscopy was developed, including the 6 core mGHAA-9 items. Respondents were asked to rank the factors from 1 to 15 (1 = most important to l5 = least important to satisfaction). Two groups were surveyed: (1) patients with prior endoscopy experience and (2) physician endoscopists. Item rank distributions overall and by patient age, gender, and procedure experience were examined. RESULTS: Of 559 outpatients surveyed, 437 (78%) provided complete responses. The mean patient age was 59 years (48.7% female, 45.3% male, 6% not stated). The number 1 ranked factor was the endoscopist's technical skills (median ranking (mr) = 1), an item included in the mGHAA-9. Pain control, a factor not assessed by the mGHAA-9, was second (mr = 4), and ranked number 1 by 16% of patients. Item rankings were consistent across patient subgroups. Relative to patients, endoscopists underprioritized preprocedure and postprocedure communication. CONCLUSIONS: The mGHAA-9 has inadequate content validity for measurement of patient satisfaction with endoscopy because it does not assess pain control. However, endoscopy satisfaction measurement with a single, universally applied instrument appears feasible.

Adult↗