Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources

Evaluation of cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists using the guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate binding assay in rat cerebellar membranes.

Cannabinoid receptors are members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. Their activation has previously been shown to stimulate guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding in a range of brain regions using both membrane preparations and autoradiography. This study evaluates the activities of structurally diverse cannabinoid receptor ligands in the GTP gamma S binding assay, comparing the relationship between receptor binding and activation and also examining efficacy differences between compounds. Using rat cerebellar membrane preparations, the effects of GDP concentration on GTP gamma S binding and the activities of a range of cannabinoid receptor ligands, including the CB1 selective antagonist SR141716A, were investigated. GDP concentration was found to have differing effects on cannabinoid-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding depending on the nature of the agonist used. The stimulation produced by high efficacy compounds, such as CP 55,940 and WIN 55212-2, was increased by raising the GDP concentration, but that of a low efficacy agonist, (-)-delta-tetrahydrocannabinol, was decreased. Of the cannabinoid compounds tested, a wide range of potencies (EC50) and levels of maximal stimulation (Emax) were observed. These ranged from CP 55,244 (Emax of 165, 148-183%, and an EC50 of 0.47, 0.22-0.96, nM) through (-)-delta-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabinol and anandamide, which produced no concentration-dependent stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding under the same conditions. SR141716A competitively antagonized all the agonists against which it was tested, providing equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd values) in the sub-nanomolar range (0.06-0.40 nM), implicating a CB1 receptor mediated response. These results provide a more detailed characterization of the cannabinoid-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding assay than has previously been reported.

Animals↗

Dual activation and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by cannabinoid receptor agonists: evidence for agonist-specific trafficking of intracellular responses.

Cannabinoid receptors couple to both Gs and Gi proteins and can consequently stimulate or inhibit the formation of cAMP. To test whether there is specificity among cannabinoid receptor agonists in activating Gs- or Gi-coupled pathways, the potency and intrinsic activity of various cannabinoid receptor ligands in stimulating or inhibiting cAMP accumulation were quantified. The rank order of potencies of cannabinoid receptor agonists in increasing or inhibiting forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation, in CHO cells expressing hCB1 receptors, was identical (HU-210 > CP-55,940 > THC > WIN-55212-2 > anandamide). However, the activities of these agonists were different in the two assays with anandamide and CP-55,940 being markedly less efficacious in stimulating the accumulation of cAMP than in inhibiting its formation. Studies examining the effects of forskolin on cannabinoid receptor mediated stimulation of adenyly cyclase also revealed differences among agonists in as much as forskolin enhanced the potency of HU-210 and CP-55,940 by approximately 100-fold but, by contrast, had no effect on the potency of WIN-55212-2 or anandamide. Taken together these findings demonstrate marked differences among cannabinoid receptor agonists in their activation of intracellular transduction pathways. This provides support for the emerging concept of agonist-specific trafficking of cellular responses and further suggests strategies for developing receptor agonists with increased therapeutic utility.

Adenylyl Cyclase Inhibitors↗

Inhibitory effects of cannabinoid receptor ligands on electrically-evoked responses in rat isolated tracheal ring segments.

We have examined the possible existence of cannabinoid receptors in the isolated rat tracheal ring segments by studying the effects of some cannabinoid receptor ligands on electrically-induced contractions. Anandamide (10(-8)-3 x 10(-5)m), an endogenous ligand for cannabinoid receptors, and WIN 55,212-2 (10(-9)-3 x 10(-5)m), a moderately selective CB(2)agonist, inhibited electrically evoked contractions of the rat tracheal ring segments in a concentration-related manner. Addition of phentolamine (10(-6)m) to Krebs Henseleit solution to block alpha(2)-adrenoceptors did not affect anandamide-induced inhibition of the electrically evoked contractions. The EC(25)(-log m) values were 5.25+/-0.2 and 5.8+/-0. 4 for anandamide and WIN 55,212-2, respectively. The maximal inhibition produced by the highest concentration of the agonists used was 51.4+/-5.8% for anandamide and 35.1+/-19.5% for WIN 55, 212-2. WIN 55,212-3 also produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the electrically evoked contractions. The maximal inhibition produced by WIN 55,212-3 was 15.8+/-2.4. The inhibitory effects of anandamide and WIN 55,212-2 were not attenuated by SR141716A (10(-6)m), a selective CB(1)receptor antagonist. Anandamide (10(-8)-3 x 10(-5)m) did not relax rat tracheal ring segments pre-contracted with carbachol (10(-6)m). These results suggest that anandamide and WIN 55,212-2 produce pre-junctional inhibitory effects in the rat trachea and that these effects were likely mediated through cannabinoid CB(2)receptors. These effects were probably non-cannabinoid receptor-mediated considering the high concentrations of the agents required to produce inhibitory responses and the effectiveness of WIN 55,212-3.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid tolerance and dependence.

The use of marijuana for recreational and medicinal purposes has resulted in a large prevalence of chronic marijuana users. Consequences of chronic cannabinoid administration include profound behavioral tolerance and withdrawal symptoms upon drug cessation. A marijuana withdrawal syndrome is only recently gaining acceptance as being clinically significant. Similarly, laboratory animals exhibit both tolerance and dependence following chronic administration of cannabinoids. These animal models are being used to evaluate the high degree of plasticity that occurs at the molecular level in various brain regions following chronic cannabinoid exposure. In this review, we describe recent advances that have increased our understanding of the impact of chronic cannabinoid administration on cannabinoid receptors and their signal transduction pathways. Additionally, we discuss several potential pharmacotherapies that have been examined to treat marijuana dependence.

Animals↗

[Cardiac and vascular effects of cannabinoids: toward a therapeutic use?].

Interest in cannabinoid pharmacology developed rapidly since the discovery of cannabinoids receptors and endocannabinoids. Modulation of this system is becoming a hot topic in cardiovascular pharmacology mainly at the light of recent findings. Among them, cardiac effects of cannabinoids were described with respect to their probable participation to the well-studied preconditioning phenomenon. Beneficial effects of post-infarction cannabinoids administration against ischemia-reperfusion injury were also reported. Concerning their vascular effects the situation is more complex some studies reporting pressor effects while others depressor ones. It was also proposed that the endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor released by various vasodilators may be an endocannabinoid an hypothesis still discussed. Finally, pathological situations concerning the cardiovascular system and including brain ischemia, hemorrhagic and endotoxic shocks were reported to be linked with endocannabinoids. However, the clinical use of cannabinoid receptors agonists or antagonists will depend on the development of non psychoactive compounds.

Animals↗

Role of cannabinoid receptors in Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol suppression of IL-12p40 in mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells infected with Legionella pneumophila.

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) injection suppresses serum interleukin-12 (IL-12) levels in Legionella pneumophila-infected mice. Dendritic cells are a major producer of IL-12 and mouse, bone marrow-derived dendritic cell cultures produced high levels of the IL-12p40 following L. pneumophila infection. Treatment with THC suppressed this cytokine response in a concentration-dependent manner and the endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoyolglycerol, less potently suppressed cytokine production. Dendritic cells expressed mRNA for cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)), cannabinoid CB(2) receptor, and vanilloid receptor 1 (TRPV1) and the addition of the G(i) inhibitor, pertussis toxin, completely attenuated suppression induced by 3 and 6 muM THC but not by 10 muM THC. Furthermore, THC suppression was partially attenuated in dendritic cells from cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and CB(2) receptor knockout mice and in dendritic cells co-treated with THC and cannabinoid receptor antagonists. Cytokine suppression was not attenuated by pretreatment with the TRPV1 antagonist, capsazepine. These results suggest that THC-induced suppression of serum IL-12 is partly due to a suppression of IL-12 production by dendritic cells and that G(i) signaling and cannabinoid receptors, but not TRPV1, are involved in this suppressive effect.

Animals↗

Inhibition of fatty-acid amide hydrolase enhances cannabinoid stress-induced analgesia: sites of action in the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray and rostral ventromedial medulla.

Recent research in our laboratory has demonstrated that stress activates an endogenous cannabinoid mechanism that suppresses sensitivity to pain [Nature 435 (2005) 1108]. In this work, CB(1) antagonists administered systemically blocked stress-induced analgesia induced by brief, continuous foot-shock. The present studies were conducted to examine the role of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in the brainstem rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) and midbrain dorsolateral periaqueductal gray (PAG) in cannabinoid stress-induced analgesia (SIA). Pharmacological blockade of vanilloid TRPV1 receptors with capsazepine, administered systemically, did not alter cannabinoid SIA, suggesting that cannabinoid SIA was not dependent upon TRPV1. Microinjection of the competitive CB(1) antagonist rimonabant (SR141716A) into either the RVM or dorsolateral PAG suppressed stress antinociception in this model. Rimonabant was maximally effective following microinjection into the dorsolateral PAG. The fatty-acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor arachidonoyl serotonin (AA-5-HT) was subsequently used to block hydrolysis of endocannabinoids and enhance SIA. Systemic and site-specific injections of AA-5-HT into either the dorsolateral PAG or RVM induced CB(1)-mediated enhancements of SIA. Palmitoyltrifluoromethylketone, a potent inhibitor of FAAH and phospholipase A2 activity, administered systemically, exerted similar effects. In all conditions, the antinociceptive effects of each FAAH inhibitor were completely blocked by coadministration of the CB(1) antagonist rimonabant. The present results provide evidence that a descending cannabinergic neural system is activated by environmental stressors to modulate pain sensitivity in a CB(1)-dependent manner.

Amidohydrolases↗

Inhibition of leukocyte function and interleukin-2 gene expression by 2-methylarachidonyl-(2'-fluoroethyl)amide, a stable congener of the endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand anandamide.

Arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide, AEA) has been identified as an endogenous ligand for cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2. Characterization of the direct cannabimimetic actions of anandamide has been hampered by its short duration of action and rapid degradation in in vivo and in vitro systems to arachidonic acid, a precursor in the biosynthesis of a broad range of biologically active molecules. In the present studies, we utilized 2-methylarachidonyl-(2'-fluoroethyl)amide (F-Me-AEA), an analog of anandamide resistant to enzymatic degradation, to determine whether F-Me-AEA modulated T cell function similar to that of plant-derived cannabinoids. Indeed, F-Me-AEA at low micromolar concentrations exhibited a marked inhibition of phorbol ester plus calcium ionophore (PMA/Io)-induced IL-2 protein secretion and steady state mRNA expression. Likewise, a modest suppression of the mixed lymphocyte response was observed in the presence of F-Me-AEA indicating an alteration in T cell responsiveness to allogeneic MHC class II antigens. F-Me-AEA was also found to modestly inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in thymocytes and splenocytes, a hallmark of cannabinoid receptor agonists. Further characterization of the influence of F-Me-AEA on the cAMP signaling cascade revealed an inhibition of CREB-1/ATF-1 phosphorylation and subsequently, an inhibition of CRE DNA binding activity. Characterization of nuclear binding proteins further revealed that NF-AT and, to a lesser extent, NF-kappaB DNA binding activities were also suppressed. These studies demonstrate that F-Me-AEA modulates T cell function in a similar manner to plant-derived and endogenous cannabinoids and therefore can be utilized as an amidase- and hydrolysis-resistant endogenous cannabinoid.

Animals↗

Role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in the formalin test of persistent pain in the rat.

It has been suggested that administration of a cannabinoid CB(1) (SR141716A ¿N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1-H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide) and CB(2) (SR144528 ¿N-[(1S)-endo-1, 3, 3-trimethyl bicyclo ¿2.2.1 heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyr azo le- 3-carboxamide¿) receptor antagonists to mice potentiates inflammatory hyperalgesia by removing an endogenous cannabinoid tone. We examined whether the behavioural response to s.c. formalin injection in rats is similarly enhanced. A total of 30 animals received SR141716A (0.5 or 5 mg/kg) or SR144528 (0.3 or 3 mg/kg) 30 min before 1% formalin. Pain behaviour was quantified using the composite weighted pain score technique (CPS-WST(0,1,2)). An overall CPS-WST(0,1,2) was calculated for each phase and groups were compared (analysis of variance). The results obtained in the control group confirmed the characteristic biphasic behavioural response to formalin injection. None of antagonist groups had a significant increase in overall CPS-WST(0,1,2) compared to the control. Indeed, a significant decrease in CPS-WST(0,1,2) scores for both phases was detected in most of all of the groups, except SR141716A at 5 mg/kg. Levels of endogenous cannabinoids (anandamide, palmitoylethanolamide, 2-arachidonylglycerol) were measured from rats hind-paw skin 1 h after s.c. injection of 0.9% saline (100 microl), 1% (50 microl), 2. 5% (50 microl) and 5% (100 microl) formalin. The concentration of endocannabinoids did not differ between control and formalin-induced inflammation groups. The activity of anandamide amidohydrolase in hind-paw skin also did not change after treatment with formalin. In conclusion, cannabinoid antagonists do not enhance formalin-evoked pain behaviour. These results suggest that, in this model, endogenous cannabinoids do not tonically attenuate inflammatory hyperalgesia.

Animals↗

The effect of cannabinoids on capsaicin-evoked calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) release from the isolated paw skin of diabetic and non-diabetic rats.

Sensory neural dysfunction is common in patients with peripheral neuropathy, a major complication of diabetes mellitus. In animal models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain cannabinoids potently attenuate pain behaviour, cannabinoid (CB) receptors located on nociceptive primary afferent neurones being important in their anti-hyperalgesic actions. A key measure of sensory neurone function is stimulus-evoked neuropeptide release. We investigated the effect of cannabinoid on capsaicin-evoked release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) from the rat paw skin in vitro, comparing non-diabetic and streptozotocin-induced diabetic animals. Diabetes caused a greater than two-fold increase in basal and capsaicin-evoked CGRP release. The synthetic CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist, CP55940 (100 nM), inhibited capsaicin-evoked CGRP release in both non-diabetic (30.92+/-7.69%, P<0.05) and diabetic animals (37.82+/-9.85%, P<0.05). The CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A (100 nM), but not the CB(2) receptor antagonist SR144528 (100 nM), significantly attenuated the inhibitory action of CP55940. The endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide (100 nM) inhibited capsaicin-evoked CGRP release in non-diabetic animals (28.88+/-7.12%, P<0.05) but neither the CB(1) nor the CB(2) receptor antagonist attenuated this action of anandamide. Anandamide (100 nM) did not significantly inhibit capsaicin-evoked CGRP release from the paw skin of diabetic animals, but it did produce a small stimulation of CGRP release at high concentrations (10 microM). These data suggest that peripheral CB(1) receptors mediate inhibition of capsaicin-evoked neuropeptide release from the paw skin of both non-diabetic and diabetic animals. However, pathological changes in the diabetic animals appear to preclude the non-CB(1) receptor mediated inhibitory action of the endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid analgesia.

During the last decade, rigorous scientific methods have been applied to determine the effects of cannabinoids on nociceptive neurotransmission. Cannabinoids have been observed to markedly decrease signalling in specific neural pathways that transmit messages about pain. These effects were found to be due to the suppression of spinal and thalamic nociceptive neurons, and independent of any actions on either the motor system or sensory neurons that transmit messages related to non-nociceptive stimulation. Spinal, supraspinal, and peripheral sites of cannabinoid analgesia have been identified. The discovery of endocannabinoids raised the question of their natural role in pain. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that endocannabinoids serve naturally to suppress pain. While it is now clear that cannabinoids suppress nociceptive neurotransmission, more work is needed to establish the clinical utility of these compounds. The few human studies conducted to date produced mixed results, with more promising findings coming from studies of clinical pain as compared with experimental pain. The therapeutic potential of cannabinoids remains an important topic for future investigations.

Analgesics↗

Cannabinoids in the treatment of glaucoma.

The leading cause of irreversible blindness is glaucoma, a disease normally characterized by the development of ocular hypertension and consequent damage to the optic nerve at its point of retinal attachment. This results in a narrowing of the visual field, and eventually results in blindness. A number of drugs are available to lower intraocular pressure (IOP), but, occasionally, they are ineffective or have intolerable side-effects for some patients and can lose efficacy with chronic administration. The smoking of marijuana has decreased IOP in glaucoma patients. Cannabinoid drugs, therefore, are thought to have significant potential for pharmaceutical development. However, as the mechanism surrounding their effect on IOP initially was thought to involve the CNS, issues of psychoactivity hindered progress. The discovery of ocular cannabinoid receptors implied an explanation for the induction of hypotension by topical cannabinoid applications, and has stimulated a new phase of ophthalmic cannabinoid research. Featured within these investigations is the possibility that at least some cannabinoids may ameliorate optic neuronal damage through suppression of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hyperexcitability, stimulation of neural microcirculation, and the suppression of both apoptosis and damaging free radical reactions, among other mechanisms. Separation of therapeutic actions from side-effects now seems possible through a diverse array of novel chemical, pharmacological, and formulation strategies.

Administration, Topical↗

In vivo and in vitro treatment with the synthetic cannabinoid CP55, 940 decreases the in vitro migration of macrophages in the rat: involvement of both CB1 and CB2 receptors.

Cannabinoids have been shown to affect immune responses, acting on different populations of immune cells. In the present paper we analyze the ability of in vivo and in vitro treatment with the potent synthetic cannabinoid CP55,940 to interfere with an important function of rat peritoneal macrophages, i.e. spontaneous migration and formyl-metionyl-leucine-phenylalanine (fMLP)-induced chemotaxis, that were assessed by the use of a Boyden-modified microchemotaxis chamber. When added in vitro, CP55,940 induced a significant and dose-dependent inhibition of both spontaneous migration and fMLP-induced chemotaxis. Both the Cannabinoid Receptor 1 (CB1) and the Cannabinoid Receptor 2 (CB2) antagonists were able to block the CP55,940-induced inhibition of spontaneous migration, although the CB2 antagonist was more potent and only the CB2 antagonist was able to reverse the effect of CP55,940 on fMLP-induced chemotaxis. Similarly, in the in vivo experiments, 1 h after the acute subcutaneous administration of 0.4 mg/kg of CP55,940, both spontaneous motility and chemotaxis were reduced. The pretreatment with the CB2 antagonist, but not with the CB1 antagonist, was able to prevent this effect. Our data confirm that cannabinoids can affect some macrophage functions, mainly throughout CB2 receptors, and suggest that the development of specific CB2 ligands may lead to an interesting new class of anti-inflammatory drugs.

Animals↗

Cannabinoids inhibit striatonigral GABAergic neurotransmission in the mouse.

The substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR) belongs to the brain regions with the highest density of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors. Anatomical studies indicate that the great majority of CB(1) receptors in the SNR are localized on terminals of GABAergic axons arriving from the caudate-putamen (striatonigral axons). The aim of the present experiments was to clarify the role of CB(1) receptors on terminals of striatonigral axons. Oblique sagittal slices, including the caudate-putamen and the substantia nigra, were prepared from brains of young mice. Electrical stimulation in the caudate-putamen elicited GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in the SNR, which were studied by patch-clamp techniques. The long latency of IPSCs (14+/-1 ms) suggests that striatonigral axons were indeed activated within the caudate-putamen. The synthetic CB(1)/CB(2) cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 (R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate; 10(-5) M) decreased the amplitude of IPSCs by 93+/-1%. CP55940 ((-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol; 10(-5) M), another CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist, also reduced IPSC amplitude, by 76+/-4%. The CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazole-carboxamide; 10(-6) M) prevented the inhibition produced by WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M). Depolarization of SNR neurons led to suppression of IPSCs; this suppression was prevented by SR141716A (10(-6) M). Three observations indicate that the agonists inhibited neurotransmission presynaptically. (1) CP55940 (10(-5) M) enhanced the ratio of amplitudes of two IPSCs which were elicited by two electrical stimuli 100 ms apart (paired pulses). (2) WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) did not change the amplitude of miniature IPSCs recorded in the presence of tetrodotoxin. (3) WIN55212-2 (10(-5) M) also had no effect on currents elicited in SNR neurons by ejection of the GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol from a pipet. In summary, we have established a method which allows selective examination of GABAergic neurotransmission between striatonigral axons and SNR neurons. Using this method, the function of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors on terminals of striatonigral axons was unequivocally clarified. Activation of these receptors causes strong presynaptic inhibition of GABAergic neurotransmission between striatonigral axons and SNR neurons. This effect may be one explanation of the catalepsy observed in animals after cannabinoid administration. Endocannabinoids released from SNR neurons can modulate striatonigral neurotransmission by inhibiting GABA release from terminals of striatonigral axons.

Animals↗

CB1 cannabinoid receptors in amphibian spinal cord: relationships with some nociception markers.

The role of cannabinoids in spinal analgesia has so far been investigated in mammals and the interactions between cannabinoid receptors and markers involved in nociception have been described in the rat spinal cord. An endocannabinoid system is well developed also in the amphibian brain. However, the anatomical substrates of pain modulation have been scarcely investigated in anamniotes, neither is there reference to such a role for cannabinoids in lower vertebrates. In the present paper we employed multiple cytochemical approaches to study the distribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors and their morphofunctional relationships with some nociception markers (i.e. Substance P, nitric oxide synthase, GABA and mu opioid receptors) in the spinal cord of the anuran amphibian Xenopus laevis. We found a co-distribution of CB1 receptors with the aforementioned signaling molecules, as well as a more limited cellular co-localization, in the dorsal and central fields of the spinal cord. These regions correspond to the mammalian laminae I-IV and X, respectively, areas strongly involved in spinal analgesia. Comparison of these results with those previously obtained in the mammalian spinal cord, reveals a number of similarities between the two systems and suggests that cannabinoids might participate in the control of pain sensitivity also in the amphibian spinal cord.

Animals↗

Presynaptic inhibition caused by retrograde signal from metabotropic glutamate to cannabinoid receptors.

We report a type of synaptic modulation that involves retrograde signaling from postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) to presynaptic cannabinoid receptors. Activation of mGluR subtype 1 (mGluR1) expressed in cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) reduced neurotransmitter release from excitatory climbing fibers. This required activation of G proteins but not Ca2+ elevation in postsynaptic PCs. This effect was occluded by a cannabinoid agonist and totally abolished by cannabinoid antagonists. Depolarization-induced Ca2+ transients in PCs also caused cannabinoid receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition. Thus, endocannabinoid production in PCs can be initiated by two distinct stimuli. Activation of mGluR1 by repetitive stimulation of parallel fibers, the other excitatory input to PCs, caused transient cannabinoid receptor-mediated depression of climbing fiber input. Our data highlight a signaling mechanism whereby activation of postsynaptic mGluR retrogradely influences presynaptic functions via endocannabinoid system.

Animals↗

O-1057, a potent water-soluble cannabinoid receptor agonist with antinociceptive properties.

Cannabinoids have low water solubility, necessitating the use of a solubilizing agent. In this paper we investigated whether a novel water-soluble cannabinoid, 3-(5'-cyano-1', 1'-dimethylpentyl)-1-(4-N-morpholinobutyryloxy)-Delta(8)- tetrahydroca nnabinol hydrochloride (O-1057), would interact with cannabinoid receptors when water or saline were used as the only vehicle. O-1057 displaced [(3)H]-CP55940 from specific binding sites on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell membranes expressing CB(1) or CB(2) cannabinoid receptors, with pK(i) values of 8.36 and 7.95 respectively. It also displaced [(3)H]-CP55940 from specific binding sites on rat brain membranes (pK(i) = 7.86). O-1057 inhibited forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP production by both CB(1)- and CB(2)-transfected CHO cells (pEC(50) = 9.16 and 9.72 respectively), its potency matching that of CP55940 and exceeding that of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol. In the mouse isolated vas deferens, O-1057 inhibited electrically-evoked contractions with pEC(50) and E(max) values of 9.73 and 76.84% respectively. It was antagonized by 100 nM SR141716A, the pK(B) of SR141716A against O-1057 (8.90) approximating to that against CP55940 (8.97). O-1057 also behaved as a CB(1) receptor agonist in vivo, reducing mouse spontaneous activity and rectal temperature when injected intravenously and inducing antinociception in the mouse tail flick test when given intravenously (ED(50) = 0.02 mg kg(-1)), intrathecally, intracerebroventricularly or by gavage. In all these assays, O-1057 was more potent than Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and, at 0.1 mg kg(-1) i.v., was antagonized by SR141716A (3 mg kg(-1) i.v.). These data demonstrate the ability of the water-soluble cannabinoid, O-1057, to act as a potent agonist at CB(1) and CB(2) receptors and warrant investigation of the clinical potential of O-1057 as an analgesic.

Analgesics↗

Cannabinoid CB1-receptor mediated regulation of gastrointestinal motility in mice in a model of intestinal inflammation.

1. We have studied the effect of cannabinoid agonists (CP 55,940 and cannabinol) on intestinal motility in a model of intestinal inflammation (induced by oral croton oil in mice) and measured cannabinoid receptor expression, endocannabinoids (anandamide and 2-arachidonylglycerol) and anandamide amidohydrolase activity both in physiological and pathophysiological states. 2. CP 55,940 (0.03 - 10 nmol mouse(-1)) and cannabinol (10 - 3000 nmol mouse(-1)) were more active in delaying intestinal motility in croton oil-treated mice than in control mice. These inhibitory effects were counteracted by the selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A (16 nmol mouse(-1)). SR141716A (1 - 300 nmol mouse(-1)), administered alone, increased intestinal motility to the same extent in both control and croton oil-treated mice. 3. Croton oil-induced intestinal inflammation was associated with an increased expression of CB(1) receptor, an unprecedented example of up-regulation of cannabinoid receptors during inflammation. 4. High levels of anandamide and 2-arachidonylglycerol were detected in the small intestine, although no differences were observed between control and croton oil-treated mice; by contrast anandamide amidohydrolase activity increased 2 fold in the inflamed small intestine. 5. It is concluded that inflammation of the gut increases the potency of cannabinoid agonists possibly by 'up-regulating' CB(1) receptor expression; in addition, endocannabinoids, whose turnover is increased in inflamed gut, might tonically inhibit intestinal motility.

Analgesics↗