Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Bladder Exstrophy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources

Experience with demucosalized ileum for bladder augmentation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of demucosalized ileum for bladder augmentation, following the same principles previously used with the sigmoid colon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with bladder exstrophy or a neurogenic bladder had their bladders augmented with demucosalized ileum instead of the sigmoid colon, but following the same technique. The use of a Foley catheter with an inflated balloon greatly facilitated the dissection of the mucosa from the muscle. A silicone model, inserted in the bladder, was used to avoid shrinkage of the patch. An animal model was also used for total bladder replacement following the same principle. RESULTS: The mean (range) follow-up was 15.4 (2-25) months. There was a significant increase in bladder compliance in all patients. A bladder of good shape and compliance was obtained in the animal model, with epithelial growth detected in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Demucosalized ileum can be used safely for bladder augmentation in the same way as with the sigmoid colon. The distension of the isolated patch greatly facilitates dissection between the mucosa and muscle. The animal model supported this method of bladder replacement.

Adolescent↗

Urethral obstruction after primary exstrophy closure: what is the fate of the genitourinary tract?

PURPOSE: We assessed the impact of posterior urethral obstruction after primary bladder exstrophy closure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the records of patients with classic bladder exstrophy at our institution identified 29 boys and 12 girls with a mean age of 11.75 years who had had posterior urethral outlet obstruction after closure was done in the neonatal period. RESULTS: Of these 41 patients 75% underwent closure elsewhere. At closure osteotomies were done in 13 patients and 23 were younger than 72 hours. Paraexstrophy skin flaps were used at primary closure in 27 cases (66%). Obstruction presented as recurrent urinary tract infection, upper tract deterioration with or without renal failure, bladder stones, difficult catheterization, urethral stitch erosion, a full bladder on ultrasound, a prolonged dry interval, urinary retention, inability to catheterize, bladder rupture, rectal prolapse and epididymitis or prostatitis. Usually the initial obstructive episode developed within 60 days of closure and it was recurrent. Therapy included suprapubic catheter placement, vesicostomy, ureterostomy, nephrostomy and multiple urethral manipulations, such as dilation with or without steroid injection, internal urethrotomy, urethral stitch removal, clean intermittent catheterization or open urethroplasty. All 6 patients who underwent long-term diversion via vesicostomy, ureterostomy or a conduit for greater than 6 months required permanent bowel segments for reconstruction, while in 5 of the 6 who underwent short-term diversion via nephrostomy or suprapubic tube placement for less than 6 months reconstruction was bowel-free. Of the 36 children in whom functional reconstruction was performed 9 are undergoing staged reconstruction, reconstruction failed in 14, 4 are socially dry and 9 are continent. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior urethral obstruction after exstrophy closure markedly decreases the success of staged bladder reconstruction, presents a significant risk to the upper urinary tract and should be detected early.

Bladder Exstrophy↗