Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Anesthesia”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32Linked to original sources

[Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol vs. propofol/N2O anesthesia].

The authors have compared two groups of 31 patients each, undergone an anaesthesia with propofol-O2/N2O (group I) and propofol-O2/air (group II). The average anaesthetic dosage and the neuromuscular recovery time have been valued, keeping constant the dose of analgesic. The average consumption of propofol (except the inductive dose of 2 mg/kg) was 7.41 +/- 1.71 mg/kg/h in group I, and 7.47 +/- 1.76 in group II (p = 0.88; not significant) and the neuromuscular recovery time 56.12 +/- 34.55 m' and 49.48 +/- 40.50 m' respectively (p = 0.53; not significant). The cardiocirculatory parameters have been compared at the time of induction, surgical incision and for all the operation time, reporting every undesired effect. The awakening has been monitored until 15 m' from the interruption of propofol infusion. The data obtained don't permit to observe significant differences with regard to analgesia, neuromuscular block and awakening time. Therefore the authors put the question of the real necessity to use nitrous oxide, when it has utilized an efficient intravenous anaesthetic as the propofol has proved to be.

Adult↗

[The recovery period following total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and alfentanil versus inhalation anesthesia using nitrous oxide and enflurane at 1.3 MAC].

Recovery of motor and mental functions were investigated in two groups with 20 young patients each. One group received total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and alfentanil for urological surgery and the other group received nitrous oxide-oxygen anaesthesia in combination with 1.3 MAC of enflurane for lumbar nucleotomy. The following parameters were investigated before and up to 100 minutes after extubation: simple and discriminating motor activities, vigilance and short and long term memory. --Simple and in discriminating motor actions show a significantly faster recovery was seen in the TIVA group during the first 20 minutes after extubation compared to the enflurane-treated patients. Speech-related functions were particularly inhibited in the inhalational anaesthesia group. After 30 to 40 minutes the propofol-alfentanil group was able to meet all requirements while patients with inhalational anaesthesia needed 80 minutes to reach the same level. Recovery of short and long-term memory was also significantly shorter in the TIVA group. This clearly indicates a faster return of mental and motor functions following total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. However the large dosages of alfentanil may be a problem with regard to post-anaesthetic respiratory depression. Further studies with larger numbers of patients will be necessary to evaluate the potential side effects of continuous propofol/alfentanil infusion. Presently, safety demands require, at least a sixty-minute post anaesthesia monitoring for patients receiving this new anaesthesia method.

Adult↗

[Epidural conduction anesthesia versus general anesthesia. A critical evaluation of outcome studies using as examples cesarean section and patients with hip fractures].

In the field of anaesthesiology, outcome studies are undertaken to investigate the influence of different anaesthetic techniques on the intra- and postoperative course of patients in special clinical situations. The design of these studies should follow high methodological standards. In the past, most studies were undertaken in patients during Caesarean section and in the treatment of hip fractures in the elderly. Up to now, results do not clearly indicate the use of certain techniques in concrete clinical situations. Decisions must be made in accordance with clinical aspects, individual experience and in cooperation with the patient and the surgeon.

Adult↗