Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Validity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires: the LVQOL and VCM1.

The Low Vision Quality of Life (LVQOL) questionnaire and the Vision-related Quality of Life Core Measure (VCM1) are two of the many vision-related quality of life (QOL) questionnaires that have been developed in recent years. Although psychometric properties of the LVQOL and VCM1 compare well with other vision-related QOL questionnaires, construct and longitudinal validity have not been assessed (adequately). The purpose of this study was to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of these questionnaires by testing specific pre-specified hypotheses about the relations of these questionnaires with other measures. The percentage of hypotheses regarding the cross-sectional construct validity that were refuted for the LVQOL was 22% for the basic aspects of vision subscale, 50% for the mobility subscale, 39% for the adjustment subscale and 17% for the reading and fine work subscale. For the VCM1 this percentage was 57%. For the longitudinal construct validity the percentage of hypotheses that were refuted ranged from 33 to 75% for the LVQOL subscales and was 50% for the VCM1. In conclusion, cross-sectional construct validity was satisfactory for the LVQOL subscales, but seemed poor for the VCM1. In addition, the longitudinal validity of these scales was poor to moderate.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

A Chinese Mandarin translation and validation of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS).

AIMS: To evaluate the validity, reliability, and cultural relevance of the Chinese Mandarin version of Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) as a disease-specific quality of life measure. METHODS: The cultural relevance and content validity of the Chinese Mandarin version of the MIDAS (CM-MIDAS) was evaluated by an expert panel. Measurement performance was tested on 180 randomly selected Chinese MI patents. Thirty participants from the primary group completed the CM-MIDAS for test-retest reliability after 2 weeks. Reliability, validity and discriminatory power of the CM-MIDAS were calculated. RESULTS: Two items were modified as suggested by the expert panel. The overall CM-MIDAS had acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.93 for the scale and 0.71-0.94 for the seven domains. Test-retest reliability by intraclass correlations was 0.85 for the overall scale and 0.74-0.94 for the seven domains. There was acceptable concurrent validity with significant (p < 0.05) correlations between the CM-MDAS and the Chinese Version of the Short Form 36. The principal components analysis extracted seven factors that explained 67.18% of the variance with high factor loading indicating good construct validity. CONCLUSION: Empirical data support CM-MIDAS as a valid and reliable disease-specific quality of life measure for Chinese Mandarin speaking patients with myocardial infarction.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Validation of the asthma impact survey, a brief asthma-specific quality of life tool.

BACKGROUND: The Asthma Impact Survey (AIS-6) is a new six question asthma outcome tool for which information on validity has not been published. OBJECTIVE: To provide validation for the AIS-6 as a brief asthma-specific quality of life tool. METHODS: Surveys were sent to a random sample of members of a large managed care organization who were at least 35 years of age and in the two-year period preceding the survey had either (1) at least one documented asthma-related medical encounter, or (2) at least a 6 months supply of asthma medication dispensed. In addition to the AIS-6, the survey included a validated quality of life tool [the mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)]; a validated asthma control questionnaire [the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ)]; a validated symptom severity scale (AOMS); and information regarding demographics, co-morbidities, asthma severity, and asthma management. The results of the AIS-6 were compared to the results of the other tools by means of correlation and factor analysis. Independent predictors of AIS-6 and AQLQ scores were determined by multiple stepwise linear regression analyses. RESULTS: AIS-6 scores were significantly related to female sex, educational level, income, smoking, body mass index (BMI), COPD, steroid use, and hospitalization history in bivariate analyses. The AIS-6 score significantly correlated (r = - 0.84, p < 0.0001) with the AQLQ total score and loaded on the three factors (activity, symptoms, and concern/bother) reflected by the survey information and on which the AQLQ also loaded. Significant but somewhat smaller correlations were found between the AIS-6 and the ATAQ (r = 0.70, p < 0.0001) and the AOMS (r = 0.55, p < 0.0001). Independent predictors were the same for the AIS-6 and AQLQ and included oral steroid use, COPD history, BMI, female sex, educational level, and hospitalization in the past year. CONCLUSION: These data support the validity of the short six-question AIS-6 as an asthma-specific quality of life tool.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Development and validation of a kinetic assay for analysis of anti-human interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody (SCH 55700) and human interleukin-5 interactions using surface plasmon resonance.

A method to assess the kinetic interactions of a humanized anti-human interleukin-5 (IL-5) monoclonal antibody (SCH 55700) with native human IL-5 using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) has been developed and validated. Since there are no clearly defined validation requirements for a SPR-based binding kinetic assay, the validation strategy was based on the guidelines stipulated by the International Conference on Harmonization for Analytical Method Validation. Due to the uniqueness of the method, however, proper interpretation of the guidance was critical for establishing a validation plan. Validation was designed to assess repeatability, intermediate precision, specificity, linearity, and robustness which included analysis of baseline stability and reproducibility of ligand immobilization. Additionally, system suitability criteria were established to assure that the assay consistently performs as it was intended. The experimental artifacts that can complicate kinetic analysis using biosensor technology, such as heterogeneity of the ligand, mass transport, and nonspecific binding, were considered during the development of this assay. For each run, replicate concentrations of SCH 55700 were injected randomly over the immobilized surfaces to acquire association- and dissociation-phase data. The data were transformed and double referenced to remove systematic deviations seen in the binding responses. Association and dissociation rates were determined using a bivalent analyte model for curve fitting.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Validity of the Medication Administration Test among older adults with and without dementia.

BACKGROUND: Impairments in everyday activities (ie, using the telephone, driving, managing medication) have been associated with increasing age as well as dementia severity. One of the initial functional losses among older adults both with and without dementia is impaired medication self-management skills. In fact, reduced ability to self administer medication has been identified as a significant predictor of an assisted living (AL) placement (vs an independent living [IL] placement) among older adults. We recently developed a Medication Administration Test (MAT) to aid in placement decisions regarding level of care (eg, IL, AL). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the construct and concurrent validity of the MAT in a sample of older adults residing in a continuing care retirement facility. METHODS: IL and AL participants were administered the MAT along with a brief neuropsychological battery that included the Naturalistic Action Test, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale. The construct validity of the MAT was assessed by correlating MAT scores with the other neuropsychological instruments of cognition and function. With respect to the MAT's concurrent validity, a discriminant function analysis was run to determine the classification accuracy (IL vs AL) of the newly developed MAT. RESULTS: Sixty-two white participants were included in the study (mean age, 85.56 years); 34 participants were residing in an AL setting and 28 were residing in an IL setting. Evidence for construct validity was relatively robust, as performance on the MAT was moderately correlated with scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Naturalistic Action Test, and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale. When MAT scores were subjected to a discriminant function analysis to assess concurrent validity, MAT performance accurately classified 79.03% of the participants into the appropriate level of care (IL or AL). CONCLUSION: This project provides preliminary evidence for the validity of the MAT when used for placement decisions within continuing care retirement communities. Given the current need for objective measures to aid in level of care decision making, the MAT may be useful in both clinical and research arenas.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2004

[Validation of the motor capacities scale: a specific evaluation of manual abilities in tetraplegics who undergo functional surgery of the upper limbs].

OBJECTIVE: Metrological investigation to develop a motor capacities scale (MCS) specifically designed for tetraplegics who undergo a functional surgery of upper limbs. METHODS: From diverse sources-review of literature, discussion with patients and therapists-, 328 daily life activities were compiled. Eighty of them were identified as motor capacities and correspond to basic and functional tasks performed by tetraplegics independently of contextual and environmental factors. Because of the absence of a reference test, a process of validation was required. In the preliminary study, patients and occupational therapists were asked to criticize the pertinence of the study. In the pilot study, patients were assessed on the basis of a protocol. Feasibility of the evaluation was also studied. The intermediate study was focused on the interrater reproducibility. The prefinal study aimed at assessing construct validity. In the final study, the external structure of the scale and responsiveness to change provided by functional surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: The preliminary and pilot studies revealed the good acceptability of the scale by both the patients and the therapists. Face and content validity were enhanced by the multidisciplinary and multicenter approach. Global reproducibility was found to be excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). MCS was correlated with the Sollerman test, the functional independence measure (FIM), the ASIA motor score, dynamometric scores of Jamar and Preston. No correlation was found with the interval since the onset of the tetraplegia, the educational level and the age at the time of the evaluation. A factorial analysis was performed in 125 patients (146 observations) and revealed one main dimension that appears to reflect manual abilities. Responsiveness to change was important regarding the short time following surgery. The final version of the MCS comprises 31 items classified in six functional categories: transfers, positioning on a Bobath's couch, positioning in a wheelchair, locomotion, motor capacities of spatial exploration and motor capacities for grasping and gripping. CONCLUSION: The MCS displays satisfactory metrological properties: a good apparent and content validity, an excellent reproducibility and a good construct validity. The data showed that sensitivity to change was good enough to consider the MCS as a valid means of assessment of the effectiveness of upper limb functional surgery in tetraplegics.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2004

Assessing pain in patients with severe cerebral palsy: development, reliability, and validity of a pain assessment instrument for cerebral palsy.

OBJECTIVES: To develop the Pain Assessment Instrument for Cerebral Palsy (PAICP) and to study its test-retest reproducibility and construct validity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. SETTING: Homes for severely handicapped. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 164 adults with severe cerebral palsy (CP), caregivers, and physiotherapists, and 9 healthy children. INTERVENTIONS: The PAICP contains drawings of situations, some situations of which usually produce pain. Patients rate the pain associated with each activity using a Faces Pain Scale. Reproducibility and construct validity was assessed in a pilot study with CP patients and healthy children. Construct validity and agreement between the pain scores of the patients and proxies was assessed in 160 patients with severe CP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pain score on the PAICP. RESULTS: The measure showed adequate test-retest reproducibility. A significant difference was found between the mean scores for "painful" and "not painful" situations. We also found moderate agreement between the scores of the patients and proxies for daily activities but only for those activities in which the proxies were personally involved. CONCLUSIONS: The PAICP has adequate test-retest reproducibility and construct validity. It provides an indication of the pain experienced by patients in situations in which proxies are not personally involved and may also be more valid than proxy measures for other situations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Validation of a new lower-extremity motor coordination test.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a new lower-extremity motor coordination test, the Lower Extremity MOtor COordination Test (LEMOCOT). DESIGN: To test reliability, subjects with impairments in at least 1 lower extremity were evaluated twice by the same evaluator. To test construct validity, the LEMOCOT scores obtained from subjects who had had a stroke were correlated with physical, functional, cognitive, and perceptual tests. SETTING: Geriatric day hospital and functional intensive rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: In the reliability test, 29 people (mean age, 69.6y; range, 28-87y); in the construct validity, 144 people who recently had had a stroke. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In addition to the LEMOCOT, the following measures were used for construct validity: the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (motor function), Berg Balance Scale, 5-m walking test, 2-minute walking test, Functional Autonomy Measurement System, Modified Mini-Mental State Examination, and Motor-Free Visual Perceptual Test. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated that test-retest reliability is good (right-side ICC=.88; left-side ICC=.83). The construct validity of the LEMOCOT was demonstrated by obtaining high correlations with physical and functional tests ( r range, .62-.79; P <.001) and no correlations with cognitive ( r =.11, P =.20) or visual perceptual tests ( r =.15, P =.08) and by discriminating between subjects discharged to long-term care versus other living environments ( P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The LEMOCOT is a simple lower-extremity motor coordination test that showed good test-retest reliability and construct validity. It can be used in clinical and research settings, specifically with people who have had a stroke. Other studies should be carried out to confirm its psychometric properties.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The development, validity, and reliability of a manual muscle testing device with integrated limb position sensors.

OBJECTIVE: To report the development and validation of a new hand-held muscle strength-testing device that is integrated with orientation sensors and designed to test the strength of major muscle groups at a given limb or joint position. DESIGN: Design description and validation study. SETTING: University-based human movement facility. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight able-bodied, healthy subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A device was developed based on a hand-held force dynamometer with integrated orientation sensors. The validity and reliability (interrater, intertrial) of 5 maximum isometric contractions of hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion were assessed. The results were compared with those from an isokinetic dynamometer (KinCom). RESULTS: The new manual muscle tester was highly reliable and valid in estimating muscle strength of the lower limbs. The coefficient of variation between trials of all movements was low, with a mean less than 10% (range, 3.7%-8.9%). The only significant difference in muscle strength between the new device and the isokinetic dynamometer was found for hip flexion. CONCLUSIONS: The new hand-held muscle strength tester appears to be a reliable and valid clinical assessment tool that can be used to objectively assess muscle strength at particular limb positions and/or joint angles. This feature appears to represent a technical advance in portable muscle strength devices, providing comparable information to those obtained by isokinetic dynamometers at a fraction of the cost and size. However, the device needs to be validated in clinical populations, such as patients with spinal cord injury and stroke, in order to demonstrate its general clinical utility.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Italian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

PURPOSE: Patient-oriented measures, represented by self-administered questionnaires, have become an important aspect of clinical outcome assessment. To be used with different language groups and in different countries, questionnaires must be translated and adapted to new cultural characteristics, and then validated by a widely accepted process to evaluate reliability and validity, fundamental characteristics for each measure. The aim of the study was to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and to assess the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. TYPE OF STUDY: A cross-cultural adaptation and cross-sectional study of a sample of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a subsample followed up prospectively for retest reliability. METHODS: The IKDC Subjective Knee Form was culturally adapted for Italian-speaking people, following the simplified Guillemin criteria. Reliability and validity were assessed in a cross-sectional study of 50 consecutive patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. A subsample of 20 patients was followed up prospectively for retest reliability. RESULTS: The results were compared with other validated patient-oriented measures. The principal IKDC scale showed a high correlation with other patient-oriented measures as hypothesized, and it also showed good values with regard to reproducibility, consistency, and validity, compared with the versions of IKDC published in other languages. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the evaluation capacities of the IKDC Italian version are equivalent to those of other language versions of the IKDC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair: a validation study of 2 scoring systems.

PURPOSE: This study tested the validity and reliability of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) cartilage repair assessment and the Oswestry Arthroscopy Score (OAS), which have been designed to assess repair of articular cartilage. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective validation study of arthroscopic cartilage repair scores. METHODS: Arthroscopic videos were assessed by a panel of orthopaedic surgeons specializing in cartilage repair. Scoring was repeated after a 2-month interval. Scorers also answered a questionnaire to assess the face and content validity of the scoring systems. Validity of the 2 systems was compared and reliability and repeatability were measured. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to measure equivalence reliability. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the repeatability and inter-rater reliability of each score, and internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: Face and content validity are acceptable for both scores. There is good agreement (equivalence reliability) between the scores (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = .88; P < .001). Stability (interobserver reliability) and repeatability (test-retest reliability) are satisfactory for both scores with an ICC >0.7 for each score. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 for ICRS and 0.82 for OAS, indicating better internal consistency for the ICRS score. CONCLUSIONS: The ICRS and OAS arthroscopic scores have been validated for the assessment of cartilage repair and both have been found to be statistically reliable and repeatable. The ICRS score does not allow for graft hypertrophy and may overscore in this situation, whereas the OAS includes assessment of graft stiffness. Both scores show satisfactory stability and repeatability. Internal consistency is adequate for both scores, although it is higher for the ICRS score. Both the ICRS and OAS arthroscopic scores are effective tools in the evaluation of cartilage repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study of nonconsecutive patients (no consistently applied reference gold standard).

Arthroscopy↗
PubMed2005

The validity of a diagnosis of heart failure in a hospital discharge register.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The accuracy of a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) in hospital discharge registers is largely unknown. We aimed to determine the validity of such a diagnosis in the Swedish hospital discharge register. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a population-based study of 2322 middle-aged men (the ULSAM study), 321 participants were diagnosed with HF according to the Swedish hospital discharge register, during a median follow-up time of 29 years. A review board examined the validity of the diagnosis according to the European Society of Cardiology definition of HF. Eighty-two percent of the possible cases were classified as having definite HF. An echocardiographic examination increased the validity to 88%. For patients treated at an internal medicine or cardiology clinic the validity was 86% and 91%, respectively. If HF was the primary diagnosis, the validity was 95%, irrespective of clinic type. CONCLUSION: The HF diagnosis in the Swedish hospital discharge register appears slightly less precise than for acute myocardial infarction and stroke. For population-based research, only those with a primary diagnosis of HF in the hospital discharge register should be regarded as definite HF cases, or alternatively the cases should be validated individually.

Forms and Records Control↗
PubMed2006

Cognitive assessment of musculoskeletal pain with a newly validated Greek version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ).

Fear of pain and avoidance are psychological factors of primary importance when assessing chronic musculoskeletal pain, which are often measured with the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Both two- and three-subscale versions have been described. The aims of this study were: to assess the cognitive traits of musculoskeletal pain patients using a newly validated Greek version of the FABQ, and to further examine the construct validity and responsiveness of the measure. Factor analysis yielded three factors that accounted for 65% of the total variance. Physical activity explained 12.3% of the variance and was identical to the original version, unlike the work subscale which split into two: the FABQ work1 related to "work as cause" (15.2% of the variance) and the FABQ work2 related to "work as prognosis" (37.5% of the variance). Internal consistency was good (0.72-0.90). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory and close to the original version both for individual items and the subscales. Responsiveness of the 3-factor model was satisfactorily assessed as the ability to detect: (A) change in general - (paired t test, effect size); (B) clinically important change (paired t test, standardised effect size), and (C) real change in the concept being measured (ROC analysis). Construct validity of the FABQ was shown through the interaction with anxiety and depression, pain control and responsibility, psychological distress and pain intensity, and criterion-related validity through the association with another fear-avoidance measure (TSK). New aspects of responsiveness and construct validity were demonstrated for the FABQ, using a three-subscale validated Greek version.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Development and external validation of an extended 10-core biopsy nomogram.

OBJECTIVES: To test the accuracy of a previously externally validated sextant biopsy nomogram in referred men exposed to > or =10 or more biopsy cores. Moreover, we explored the hypothesis that a more accurate predictive tool could be developed. METHODS: Previous nomogram predictors (age, digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen, and percent free PSA) were used to assess the accuracy of our previous nomogram in a cohort consisting of 2900 men referred for prostatic evaluation. Moreover, these variables were complemented with sampling density (SD) (i.e., ratio of gland volume and the number of planned biopsy cores) within multivariable logistic regression models (LRM) predicting presence of prostate cancer (pCA) on the initial 10 or more core biopsy. The LRMs were used to develop and internally validate (200 bootstrap resamples) a new nomogram in 1162 men from Hamburg, Germany. The LRMs' external validity was tested in three separate cohorts (Hamburg, n=582; Milan, n=961; Seattle, n=195). RESULTS: The contemporary external validation of the previously validated sextant nomogram demonstrated 70% accuracy. Internal validation of the new nomogram demonstrated 77% accuracy, and external cohorts demonstrated 73-76% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of extended biopsy schemes, previously developed predictive models are less accurate in predicting the probability of pCA on initial biopsy. We developed a new tool that allows obtaining more accurate predictions. Moreover, before biopsy, it also allows defining the ideal ratio between gland volume and the number of planned biopsy cores that would yield the ideal biopsy rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Validation of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (QoL-AGHDA).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Quality of Life-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (QoL-AGHDA). DESIGN: Observational study; cross-sectional, longitudinal. METHODS: Seventy-five adults with growth hormone deficiency completed the SF-36 (a generic health-related QOL scale) and the QoL-AGHDA before growth hormone replacement therapy and approximately 3 weeks later (when the therapy began). A sample (n=1000) of controls from the general population was also studied. We computed rates of missing data, measured reproducibility and internal consistency reliability, and tested for known-groups validity, concurrent validity, unidimensionality (by principle component analysis), and content validity. RESULTS: Rates of missing data were low (0-1.4%). The mean of QoL-AGHDA scores in the patients was 8.2 (SD, 6.4). The scores were reproducible (k=0.41-0.78), and internally consistent (alpha=0.91) and the scale was unidimensional. QoL-AGHDA scores were associated with SF-36 scores as hypothesized. Scores were significantly higher in the patients than in controls (8.1+/-0.7, and 5.6+/-0.2, P<0.001). Discrimination between patients and controls was slightly better using scores on the "General Health" and "Role Physical" subscale of the SF-36 as explanatory variables than using QoL-AGHDA scores. CONCLUSIONS: The QoL-AGHDA's reliability, validity, and rates of missing data were satisfactory, and the scale was confirmed to be unidimensional. However, because some subscales of the SF-36 were better for discriminating patients from controls, the content validity of the QoL-AGHDA may need to be re-evaluated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to translate the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES) into Chinese and test the validity and reliability of the instrument within a Taiwanese population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A two-stage design was used for this study. Stage I consisted of a multi-stepped process of forward and backward translation, using focus groups and consensus meetings to translate the 20-item Australia/English version DMSES to Chinese and test content validity. Stage II established the psychometric properties of the Chinese version DMSES (C-DMSES) by examining the criterion, convergent and construct validity, internal consistency and stability testing. The sample for Stage II comprised 230 patients with type 2 diabetes aged 30 years or more from a diabetes outpatient clinic in Taiwan. RESULTS: Three items were modified to better reflect Chinese practice. The C-DMSES obtained a total average CVI score of .86. The convergent validity of the C-DMSES correlated well with the validated measure of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in measuring self-efficacy (r=.55; p<.01). Criterion-related validity showed that the C-DMSES was a significant predictor of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities scores (Beta=.58; t=10.75, p<.01). Factor analysis supported the C-DMSES being composed of four subscales. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=.77 to .93) and test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation coefficient r=.86, p<.01) were found. CONCLUSIONS: The C-DMSES is a brief and psychometrically sound measure for evaluation of self-efficacy towards management of diabetes by persons with type 2 diabetes in Chinese populations.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2004

The youth/adolescent questionnaire has low validity and modest reliability among low-income African-American and Hispanic seventh- and eighth-grade youth.

The Youth/Adolescent Questionnaire is a food frequency questionnaire developed for youth aged 9 to 19 years that attempts to assess diet during the past 12 months. It was developed and previously validated with white youth; however, a validation study with fourth- to seventh-grade African-American youth revealed lower validation coefficients. This study validated the Youth/Adolescent Questionnaire with 89 low-income seventh- and eighth-grade Hispanic and African-American youth. The youth completed the Youth/Adolescent Questionnaire on two occasions 3 weeks apart, and completed up to six food records in between. Most of the reliability coefficients were adequate, except for percent of energy from fat and high-fat vegetables for Hispanic students. Validity coefficients were low, even after correcting for error. The ability of seventh- and eighth-grade low-income African-American and Hispanic youth to report usual intake over a period of time appears to be limited and may not provide a valid measure of consumption.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The SCOPA-Motor Scale for assessment of Parkinson's disease is a consistent and valid measure.

OBJECTIVE: The SCOPA-Motor Scale (S-MS) for assessment of Parkinson's disease (PD), contains 21 items in three domains: Motor examination, Disability, and Complications. Our objective was to validate the S-MS Spanish version. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This validation study was based on a multicenter, cross-sectional, one-point-in-time evaluation design. The applied measures were: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-3.0 (UPDRS); S-MS; PD Global Evaluation (PDGE); and Clinical Global Impression of severity (CGI). Completeness of data collection, floor and ceiling effect, internal consistency, precision, and construct and discriminative validity were analyzed in 151 PD patients. RESULTS: Scores from S-MS were fully computable. Floor effect was high for Complications (43.7%). Cronbach's alpha was > 0.90 for every domain, and item-total correlation was > 0.70 except for Examination. Standard error of measurement (SEM) ranged from 0.40 to 2.4. Convergent validity with corresponding UPDRS sections yielded coefficients > 0.90. Discriminative validity across Hoehn and Yahr (HY) and CGI stages was significant (Kruskal-Wallis, P < .0001). Insofar as internal consistency was concerned, alpha-values of the Examination sections were marginally higher for the UPDRS than for the S-MS (a finding perhaps accounted for by redundancy in this part of the UPDRS). CONCLUSION: The S-MS is a consistent and valid scale, shorter by almost half than the UPDRS.

Aged↗