Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PHARMACOLOGY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources

In-vivo metabolism of 4-substituted arylpiperazines to pharmacologically active 1-arylpiperazines.

A common metabolic process of 4-substituted arylpiperazine pharmacological agents is cleavage of the side-chain to yield 1-arylpiperazines. These metabolites are a well-known class of centrally active compounds and their formation may therefore be a pharmacologically significant pathway, at least in certain species, for derivates that undergo extensive cleavage of the arylpiperazine side-chain. Of pharmacological relevance is the observation that they may have a spectrum of pharmacological actions different from the parent compound(s). As illustrated by the anxiolytic agent buspirone, its derivates gepirone and isapirone and their common metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (PmP), parents drug(s) and metabolite may have quite different mechanism of action. In other cases, the 1-arylpiperazine metabolite and its parent drug(s) may act antagonistically (i.e. 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-piperazine, mCIPP, and its parent drugs trazodone and etoperidone). The kinetic properties of 1-arylpiperazine metabolites may differ from those of the parent compound, particularly in relation to the extent to which they enter the brain, the site of action of most of these compounds. The examples given although limited, provide evidence that kinetics and pharmacological studies on 1-arylpiperazine metabolites are important in seeking to understand the mechanism of action of the 4-substituted derivatives and in extrapolating pharmacological finding from animals to man.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid pharmacology.

The pharmacology of the cannabinoids is characterized by at least two very provocative phenomena. First, the multiplicity of effects. As I have mentioned throughout this review, most of these effects are due to actions on the central nervous system. The major problem in the search for a therapeutic agent in this series has been due to the inability to find a cannabinoid with the therapeutic action at doses below those that produce side effects. The high lipid solubility of the cannabinoids allows them to be distributed throughout the brain at reasonable doses. The second aspect of their pharmacology worthy of special mention is their low toxicity. Throughout this review, I have indicated that the minimal effective dose of delta 9-THC for a particular pharmacological effect in animals was higher than that usually consumed by man. Yet, in almost all cases, it was much lower than the dose which produced toxic effects in the same species. These two characteristics of the animal pharmacology of cannabinoids carry over to humans. For instance, each of the cannabinoids tested in man causes many side effects at active doses and lethal effects of overdose by humans are nonexistent or rare. Toxicity following chronic use may be a different issue. A great deal of work has been carried out in an attempt to characterize the pharmacological effects of cannabinoids. It is clear from the material reviewed in this article that most if not all of the predominant effects of cannabinoids in whole animals are due to the direct effects of these compounds on the central nervous system. Our state of knowledge is too limited to rule out the possibility that they also produce effects on certain peripheral organs. It is expected that the majority of these effects will be shown to be due to the interaction of the cannabinoids with the neuronal innervation of the organ rather than directly with the organ tissue itself. Very high doses of cannabinoids just like all active drugs have an effect on many organ systems. These are toxicologic not pharmacologic and are nonspecific. The effects of cannabinoids at the molecular level have been reviewed by Martin (182a) in this series. This type of research is expected to elucidate the mechanism of action of cannabinoids at the cellular level. It is clear that the cannabinoids produce a unique behavioral syndrome in laboratory animals and in man.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aggression↗

1994 John J. Bonica Lecture. The clinical effects of morphine pharmacology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The literature is replete with studies of morphine. It is not surprising that some viewpoints expressed tend to be often repeated without critical analysis. The goal of this lecture is to probe some commonly held viewpoints about the pharmacology of morphine. This involves retracing some of its history, re-examining its physicochemical nature, re-evaluating its physiologic disposition and the pharmacologic activity of its metabolites. METHODS: The background material selected for inclusion consists of historic pharmacologic secondary sources, selections from the recent primary literature on morphine pharmacokinetics and metabolism, and vignettes from the author's personal research in progress with colleagues in Australia. RESULTS: The author's perspective is that of a chemical pharmacologist with more than a passing interest in pharmacokinetics. The synthesis evaluates the therapeutic consequences of the pharmacologic aspects chosen. CONCLUSIONS: Morphine in various forms has been used successfully in the alleviation of pain for at least several millenia but it is only relatively recently that a rationale for its action has been found. Morphine is a relatively poorly lipophilic opioid but equilibrates with tissue of the brain relatively easily. While the metabolism of morphine occurs in the liver, it is metabolized in the kidneys and brain as well. The clearance of morphine is not notably decreased by renal dysfunction, but clearance of its glucuronide metabolites is decreased markedly. While the metabolites produced may be shown to be pharmacologically active in particular experimental preparations, it is not yet certain that they contribute pharmacologically after systemic administration of morphine in experimental animals or humans with generally normal physiology.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Carbon-11-cocaine binding compared at subpharmacological and pharmacological doses: a PET study.

UNLABELLED: We have characterized cocaine binding in the brain to a high-affinity site on the dopamine transporter using PET and tracer doses of [11C]cocaine in the baboon in vivo. The binding pattern, however, of cocaine at tracer (subpharmacological) doses may differ from that observed when the drug is taken in behaviorally active doses particularly since in vitro studies have shown that cocaine also binds to low affinity binding sites. METHODS: PET was used to compare and characterize [11C]cocaine binding in the baboon brain at low subpharmacological (18 micrograms average dose) and at pharmacological (8000 micrograms) doses. Serial studies on the same day in the same baboon were used to assess the reproducibility of repeated measures and to assess the effects of drugs which inhibit the dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin transporters. Time-activity curves from brain and the arterial plasma input function were used to calculate the steady-state distribution volume (DV). RESULTS: At subpharmacological doses, [11C]cocaine had a higher binding and slower clearance in striatum than in other brain regions. At pharmacological doses, [11C]cocaine had a more homogeneous distribution. Bmax/Kd for sub-pharmacological [11C]cocaine corresponded to 0.5-0.6 and for pharmacological [11C]cocaine it corresponded to 0.1-0.2. Two-point Scatchard analysis gave Bmax = 2300 pmole/g and Kd' = 3600 nM. Bmax/Kd for sub-pharmacological doses of [11C]cocaine was decreased by cocaine and drugs that inhibit the dopamine transporter, to 0.1-0.2, but not by drugs that inhibit the serotonin or the norepinephrine transporter. None of these drugs changed Bmax/Kd for a pharmacological dose of [11C]cocaine. CONCLUSION: At subpharmacological doses, [11C]cocaine binds predominantly to a high-affinity site on the dopamine transporter.

Animals↗

Species orthologs of the alpha-2A adrenergic receptor: the pharmacological properties of the bovine and rat receptors differ from the human and porcine receptors.

Four pharmacological subtypes of the alpha-2 adrenergic receptor have been identified; however, only three subtypes exist in any given species. Although the alpha-2A adrenergic receptor, as defined by the human platelet, and the alpha-2D receptor, as defined in the bovine pineal, have very different pharmacological characteristics, they are more similar to each other than either is to the alpha-2B or alpha-2C subtype. The human alpha-2-C10 clone (alpha-2A) and the rat RG20 clone have an 89% identity in their predicted amino acid sequence and are considered to be species orthologs. Although the expressed RG20 clone appears to have alpha-2D pharmacology, a careful comparison of its pharmacological characteristics with the bovine pineal has not been reported previously. Based on the pKi values of a panel of 13 alpha-2 adrenergic agents that have been used previously to compare the alpha-2A, alpha-2B and alpha-2C subtypes, the pharmacological characteristics of the bovine pineal alpha-2D receptor appear to be very similar to the rat RG20 clone (correlation coefficient, r, of 0.93). The porcine ortholog of the human alpha-2-C10 receptor has pharmacological characteristics identical to the human alpha-2A receptor (r = 0.99). Because of its higher affinity for the alpha-2D receptor, [3H]RX821002 is a better radioligand than [3H]rauwolscine for studying this receptor subtype.

Animals↗

Pharmacologic stress testing: experience with dipyridamole, adenosine, and dobutamine.

The use of pharmacologic stress testing for detecting and assessing ischemic heart disease (IHD) is reviewed. Methods of diagnosing IHD are designed to emulate conditions that increase myocardial oxygen demand in order to identify areas of ischemia and atherosclerotic lesions and to evaluate their functional or anatomical importance. Diagnostic methods can be divided into functional assessment with stress testing and anatomical assessment with coronary angiography. Physical stressors, such as exercise or atrial pacing, or pharmacologic stressors, such as vasodilators or beta-adrenergic-receptor agonists, can be used in stress testing. Electrocardiography, thallium planar scintigraphy, echocardiography, and other techniques are used to evaluate the response to stress testing. Unlike exercise stress testing, pharmacologic testing does not require physical exertion. Adenosine, dipyridamole, and dobutamine are the principal agents used in pharmacologic stress testing. Adenosine and dipyridamole mediate coronary artery vasodilation. Adenosine, a direct agonist, has a rapid onset and short duration of action. Dipyridamole, the only agent with approved labeling for use in stress testing, inhibits adenosine indirectly. Dobutamine increases cardiac output and heart rate as well as promoting coronary artery vasodilation. Clinical trials show that all three drugs can be used safely and effectively in patients after acute myocardial infarction or before vascular surgery and in individuals with risk factors for or symptoms of IHD. The sensitivity and specificity of pharmacologic stress testing for detecting IHD are at least as high as those of exercise testing. Minor adverse effects, including chest pain, headache, and facial flushing, are common, but major adverse effects are rare. Pharmacologic stress testing can be used in patients who cannot undergo exercise testing and offers a noninvasive alternative to coronary angiography.

Adenosine↗

Differential pharmacology of cloned human and mouse B2 bradykinin receptors.

The pharmacology of cloned B2 bradykinin receptors heterologously expressed in cell lines lacking any endogenous bradykinin receptors was analyzed. The possibility of B2 bradykinin receptor heterogeneity had been proposed on the basis of numerous studies in various tissue preparations. The results reported here permit a direct evaluation of some of these hypotheses by examining the pharmacological properties of cloned bradykinin receptors. A cloned human B2 bradykinin receptor was stably transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells. The data suggest that in response to bradykinin (BK), the cloned receptor activates both phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and arachidonic acid release by independent pathways. Thus, the activation of these two second messenger pathways does not require the existence of two B2 bradykinin receptor subtypes. A mouse gene encoding the B2 bradykinin receptor was isolated, and the coding region was expressed in COS-7 cells. This murine receptor exhibited the pharmacological properties of a "classical" B2 bradykinin receptor. A comparison of the pharmacological profiles of cloned human and murine homologs of the B2 bradykinin receptor indicates that both receptors bind agonists with similar properties. However, the two receptors differ dramatically in their affinity for some peptide antagonists. The mouse receptor has a 60- to 80-fold higher affinity for [D-Arg0Hyp3, Thi5,8,D-Phe7]BK and [D-Arg0,Hyp3,D-Phe7]BK than its human homolog. Thus, the species of a bradykinin receptor can have a significant effect on its pharmacology. The cloning, expression, and pharmacological comparison of human and mouse B2 bradykinin receptor genes indicate that some of the previous reports of B2 receptor subtypes can be explained by species differences in a single B2 bradykinin receptor gene.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Does pharmacologic coronary flow reserve reflect vasodilator responsiveness to increased myocardial demand in humans?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between maximal pharmacologic coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in nonstenotic coronary arteries. BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the coronary microcirculation in humans during cardiac catheterization is commonly performed by assessment of coronary hemodynamics during administration of potent coronary vasodilators. However, the relationship between maximal pharmacologic vasodilation and flow increases occurring in response to increased myocardial demand has not been evaluated. METHODS: The coronary blood flow responses to a maximally dilating dose of intracoronary adenosine or papaverine and to a standardized atrial pacing stress were assessed in 49 patients using intracoronary Doppler velocimetry. The blood flow responses to a maximally dilating dose of intracoronary adenosine and to intravenous infusion of dobutamine were determined in 13 patients. RESULTS: The maximal pharmacologic coronary flow reserve averaged 3.2 +/- 0.1 (mean +/- SEM). The coronary blood flow velocity increased by 32 +/- 3% during atrial pacing, and the change in coronary flow velocity was correlated with the change in the mean arterial pressure x heart rate product during pacing. Regression analysis revealed no relationship between the pharmacologic coronary flow reserve and the change in coronary flow velocity during atrial pacing or the response of the flow to pacing normalized with respect to the magnitude of stress reflected by the change in rate x pressure product. The coronary blood flow velocity increased by 135 +/- 16% during dobutamine infusion. Regression analysis revealed no relationship between the pharmacologic coronary flow reserve and the change in coronary flow velocity during dobutamine infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the maximal pharmacologic coronary flow reserve is an inadequate surrogate for assessment of coronary vasodilation in response to increases in myocardial metabolic demand in nonstenotic arteries.

Adenosine↗

[Pharmacology, an innovative factor in therapeutic research].

As members of the pharmacology training group set up by the committee of pharmacological science of the French Academy of Pharmacy, we examine the situation of pharmacology in drug discovery. Today, it is obvious that by integrating genome sequencing, cellular and molecular biology, and bioinformatics, pharmacology has become a cross-disciplinary science. Pharmacologists must become knowledgeable in a wide range of domains, using the major points in each to direct them towards the discovery and development of new therapeutic agents. It is also clear that pharmacology remains a major factor in the different steps of drug discovery, from the molecular and cellular stages, to clinical and pharmaceutical developments.

Drug Therapy↗

[Integration of training in pharmacology and pharmacotherapy in the medical curriculum in Leiden, the Netherlands].

In the new medical curriculum at Leiden University Medical Centre, the Netherlands, two aspects of the training in pharmacology and pharmacotherapy--the acquisition of knowledge and its application--have been integrated. On the basis of the approved subject matter and goals, four computer programmes were developed: the Teaching Resource Centre (TRC) Pharmacology database, the interactive TRC teaching programme, the Individual Therapy: Evaluation and Plan (ITEP), and the relational curriculum database. Together, these programmes provide the necessary knowledge in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, pharmacotherapy and the mechanisms of drug action, as well as possibilities for monitoring the educational process. The figures are created with the aid of a symbolic language, assuring a uniform presentation of all the information throughout the curriculum. Attention is also paid to the integration of these aspects with other subjects in the medical curriculum. Implementation of the teaching system in pharmacology was started at the beginning of 2001. Currently, the TRC database contains almost all the subject matter that is planned to be included. The next step in the process will be the assessment of both the knowledge and its application. TRC Pharmacology is a new method of integrating basic knowledge of pharmacology and pharmacotherapy in a medical school curriculum.

Clinical Competence↗

Development of PharmTest: a unique personal computer-mediated tool for assessment of pharmacology.

This report concerns the development of an assessment* model (PharmTest) for further evaluation by academic pharmacologists. The content area chosen for this model is the pharmacology of affective disorders. The components of the PharmTest system are: 1) a cognitive map of the content area used to develop the learning objectives (Figure): 2) both lower- and higher-level objectives developed jointly by basic and clinical faculty; 3) a bank of multiple choice questions (MCQ) judged to be congruent to the objectives by an expert panel; 4) a software program (SP) to manage the testing process; and 5) an annotated self-study document to aid students in their review after computer self-testing. PharmTest is designed to assist faculty in producing tests, making possible student self-testing and study. PharmTest was developed during a 6-month cooperative project between a faculty member from the University of North Carolina (HJB) and faculty of the University of Dundee. This report presents the learning objectives and cognitive map developed for the model content topic of "Pharmacology of Affective Disorders." Also it suggests a recipe for development of other content areas of pharmacology based on this project. Also, it presents the development process for PharmTest. Finally a plan for collecting evaluation data from academic pharmacology faculty is presented. Implications of the increased efficiency to faculty in linking learning objectives and testing are discussed, and a suggestion is made for national evaluation of learning in pharmacology.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗

Inadequate reporting of analytical quality control in the clinical pharmacological literature.

Quality control parameters were surveyed in the clinical pharmacological literature of 1984 and 1985, as published by the European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, and Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Papers which included newly developed methods gave details about precision and sensitivity in more than 60% and about accuracy and specificity in nearly 30%. Fewer than one-third of all articles containing analytical methods, described by citation only, gave information about precision and sensitivity in the originating laboratory, and accuracy and specificity were reported by less than 10% of them. These data represent an important deficiency in laboratory information in the clinical pharmacological literature.

Periodicals as Topic↗

Model-based drug development: the road to quantitative pharmacology.

High development costs and low success rates in bringing new medicines to the market demand more efficient and effective approaches. Identified by the FDA as a valuable prognostic tool for fulfilling such a demand, model-based drug development is a mathematical and statistical approach that constructs, validates, and utilizes disease models, drug exposure-response models, and pharmacometric models to facilitate drug development. Quantitative pharmacology is a discipline that learns and confirms the key characteristics of new molecular entities in a quantitative manner, with goal of providing explicit, reproducible, and predictive evidence for optimizing drug development plans and enabling critical decision making. Model-based drug development serves as an integral part of quantitative pharmacology. This work reviews the general concept, basic elements, and evolving role of model-based drug development in quantitative pharmacology. Two case studies are presented to illustrate how the model-based drug development approach can facilitate knowledge management and decision making during drug development. The case studies also highlight the organizational learning that comes through implementation of quantitative pharmacology as a discipline. Finally, the prospects of quantitative pharmacology as an emerging discipline are discussed. Advances in this discipline will require continued collaboration between academia, industry and regulatory agencies.

Adult↗

The teaching of clinical pharmacology in Europe and North America.

A recent survey conducted under the auspices of the WHO shows that on average in European medical schools only 28 hours of teaching are devoted to clinical pharmacology, whereas over 100 hours are devoted to pharmacology. In many schools no clinical pharmacology is taught, and there is a lack of trained individuals and posts in clinical pharmacology. In North America there is a similar lack of clinical pharmacology teaching.

Europe↗

Defining the true therapeutics and clinical pharmacology curriculum in a Canadian medical school: implications for change.

Concern over rational drug therapy has led to the close scrutiny of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics teaching. Course syllabuses and timetables portray the official curriculum but rarely reflect true pharmacology and content. The teaching of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics can be uniquely and comprehensively analyzed with a computer-based curriculum data base that has the capacity to identify overlap, integration, omissions, and correlations. We have developed such a system and applied it to the analysis of one medical school curriculum. Pharmacology and therapeutics teaching represents 22% of the curriculum; however, the majority occurs outside the pharmacology-controlled courses. Overlap is extensive and unplanned. Our data indicate that the true curriculum differs greatly from that in curriculum schedules and probably from that in the minds of most curriculum planners and teachers. Collaboration among pharmacologists and clinical pharmacologists and many other curriculum officers and teachers is essential if education in this area is to be improved.

Canada↗

Safety pharmacology in the nonclinical assessment of new medicinal products: definition, place, interest and difficulties.

Until the year 2000 there was no internationally-accepted definition for the terms used in nonclinical pharmacology (primary, secondary pharmacodynamics, discovery, safety pharmacology, etc). Now, after ICH5 (San Diego, November 2000), a harmonisation of the nomenclature is adopted: safety pharmacology is defined as the studies that investigate the potential undesirable pharmacodynamic effects of a medicinal product on physiological functions in relationship to exposure. Consequently, safety pharmacology studies are a part of the safety assessment for a new product, in the same way than toxicological studies, and a basic battery of tests (core battery) has to be conducted prior to the first administration to humans. Safety pharmacology studies are of peculiar interest: they show a good predictive potential for humans, they do not require a large number of laboratory animals, long-term studies, large amount of products and they are more dynamic and more flexible than toxicological studies. Nevertheless, many difficulties occur for the implementation in industry, related to practical and/or scientific problems: location of the studies, routine activity for the pharmacologists, sometimes difficulties in the relationship between toxicologists and pharmacologists, adaptation to the GLP requirements, elaboration of an early relevant scientific programme, necessity to go to contract-labs or to academic research for unusual or for up to date methods, etc. To conclude, a retrospective timetable of the regulatory evolution for the last 10 years will be provided, as an illustration of the worldwide progress in the concept of 'harmonisation' for the assessment of new medicinal products.

Drug Evaluation, Preclinical↗

[Contribution of pharmacology for new drug application in Japan].

The Organization for Pharmaceutical Safety and Research (OPSR), Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Evaluation Center (PMDEC), National Institute of Health Sciences and Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW) are working together on the new pharmaceutical approval process in Japan for appropriate scientific approaches. The Consultation Division of OPSR helps the pharmaceutical companies to answer find solutions to their concerns about non-clinical and clinical trials in the new pharmaceutical development process. After a new pharmaceutical application, PMDEC evaluates the quality, efficacy, and safety of each pharmaceutical compound in the review process. Final judgment for approval is made by MHLW. Pharmacological mechanisms examined in non-clinical trials would be useful for selection of the appropriate end-point in the clinical trials. For safety assessment, International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) Guideline on Safety Pharmacology Studies was officially notified. According to pharmacological data on safety, clinical investigators can better design clinical trials to prevent patients from suffering serious adverse events. To development new epoch pharmaceuticals, continuous progress on pharmacological research will be indispensable. Further discussion among all interested parties such as pharmacological researchers, medical doctors, companies, and regulatory sites will be necessary and useful to develop more appropriate approaches in the pharmaceutical development process.

Animals↗

Tutorial reduces protocol deviations in multicenter ACTG trials with pharmacology endpoints.

PURPOSE: The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) pharmacology quality assurance program requires clinical research staff to demonstrate minimum competencies in clinical pharmacology research. To achieve this goal, a tutorial was designed to improve the accuracy and completeness of data collected in ACTG pharmacology protocols. METHOD: Clinical research staff at AIDS Clinical Trials Units (ACTUs) access the tutorial through the network's Website. The tutorial presents pharmacokinetic study concepts by contrasting poor with perfect study conduct to illustrate the influence of data quality on conclusions. Case report forms and laboratory data were audited retrospectively to examine the pre- and posttutorial incidence of targeted errors. RESULTS: During a 2-year period, 236 study nurses at 64 main and subunit ACTUs completed the tutorial. The percentage of visits with dosing and/or sampling errors dropped from 13% to 4%. The percentage of samples with errors decreased from 6% to 3%. Sample-time errors (blood drawn outside of the 15-minute target time) decreased slightly, from 2.9% to 2.4%, but the discrepancies found in the recording of sample times decreased from 3% to <1%. CONCLUSION: The ACTG clinical pharmacology tutorial program improved accuracy of both protocol conduct and data collection for pharmacology objectives.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗