Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “General Practitioners”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources

Attitudes to medical care, the organization of work, and stress among general practitioners.

Eighty five volunteer general practitioners in Lothian region recorded clinical and contextual information on 21,000 consultations during 1987-88. During their recording sessions they reported their perceived levels of stress using a previously validated scale. Subsequently, 80 of the doctors completed a previously validated multi-dimensional scale about their attitudes to patient care. Three attitude subscales (psychological orientation, appropriateness of consultations and responsibility for decisions) correlated with processes of care previously identified as indicators of good care. The 20 doctors who scored most highly on these patient-centred scales recorded self-perceived stress in 27% of their consultations compared with 11% of the consultations of the 33 doctors who scored lowest on these scales. Among the 20 most patient-centred doctors those booking patients at eight patients per hour or more reported stress at twice as many consultations as those with a longer booking interval; doctors whose preferred working styles conflicted with their booking patterns reported stress in up to 62% of consultations. Doctors with a higher patient-centred orientation find their work more stressful. Longer booking intervals remove much of that stress, particularly when doctors' preferred style of consulting requires them to spend more time at individual consultations. Previously described work stressors offer a theoretical explanation for a problem which is important for both doctors and patients.

Adult↗

[The practice guideline 'Rheumatoid arthritis' (first revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners: a response from the perspective of general practice].

In the revised guideline on rheumatoid arthritis of the Dutch College of General Practitioners, in contrast to the previous guideline, particular emphasis is given to an early diagnosis. Moreover, rapid and maximal suppression of the disease process is recommended to delay or prevent damage to the joints. This policy however does not take into account the lack of evidence with regard to improvement of prognostic disability parameters. A careful, individualized referral indication is necessary so as to reduce the chance that patients are referred and treated but later turn out not to have had rheumatoid arthritis.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

[The practice guideline 'Hypertension' (third revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

In the revised practice guideline on hypertension from the Dutch College of General Practitioners, some changes have been made in the areas of diagnosis and therapy in comparison to the previous edition. Finding people with hypertension is a major goal for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. A systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg (> 160 mmHg in patients > 60 years) necessitates non-pharmaceutical advice and antihypertensive therapy with diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium antagonists, either as monotherapy or in combination. In view of the ever-increasing importance of ACE inhibitors in antihypertensive therapy, we expect that the next revision of the practice guideline will soon be necessary.

Age Factors↗

[The practice guideline 'Depressive disorder' (first revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

The revised Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline 'Depressive disorder' no longer distinguishes between mild and severe depression because the management in both cases is identical. This guideline focuses much attention on diagnosis, support and information, all of this in dialogue with the patient. The choice between the antidepressants, a tricyclic antidepressant or a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor is based on the contraindications of these drugs.

Antidepressive Agents↗

[The practice guideline 'Lower urinary-tract symptoms in middle-aged and elderly men' (second revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

Recent research has shown that the simple pathophysiological concept which explains micturition complaints in elderly men as being caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia needs to be abandoned. It has been shown that there is no clear correlation between prostate volume and voiding problems and also that reductase blocker drugs which specifically decrease prostate volume do not lead to a clinically important reduction in symptoms. The internationally accepted new conceptual umbrella description of these micturition problems is 'lower urinary-tract symptoms', a term that is more suited to research this area where a good understanding of the fundamental underlying mechanisms is lacking. The Dutch general practitioners' guideline for micturition problems in elderly men addresses this paradigm change in a thorough and easily understandable way.

Aged↗

[The practice guideline 'CVA' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

The practice guideline from the Dutch College of General Practitioners regarding the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of a patient with a cerebrovascular accident recommends the patient's referral to a so-called 'stroke-unit'. Thrombolysis within 3 hours after the onset of a stroke should be reconsidered, although its effectiveness remains disputable. The guideline does not explicitly address the GP's responsibility for secondary prevention. The role of the GP in the process of rehabilitation and follow-up in the years after the CVA is described in detail. In so doing, this phase gets the attention it deserves.

Humans↗

[The practice guideline 'Headache' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice].

The practice guideline 'Headache' from the Dutch College of General Practitioners, which replaces the guideline 'Migraine', is an improvement in many respects: tension headache and substance-induced headache are discussed in detail, the headache diary is given due emphasis and the recommended treatment for migraine is well-balanced. The symptom-oriented approach is, however, not applied consistently in this guideline and too little attention is given, in particular, to the exclusion of serious causes that are less commonly encountered. The guidelines for performing physical examination provide insufficient footing. The exclusion of serious diseases should be based on a limited set of specific physical examinations to be carried out in all cases of new headache. Interrogating the patient about possible social or psychological aspects and the possibility of referral in this area deserve increased emphasis.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

Domiciliary hospice care: a survey of general practitioners.

A survey of general practitioners in two London health districts was undertaken to gauge their reaction to a domiciliary hospice team which had been available in those districts for two years. Seventy-two per cent of the 226 respondents had used the service, 23% more than four times, and 94% indicated satisfaction at having such a service available, with only 1% expressing dissatisfaction. Although the overall response to the questionnaire was positive, much constructive criticism was also received. Conducting the survey has encouraged more doctors to use the service.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

[Diagnosis and treatment of acute sinusitis by Danish general practitioners].

We studied Danish general practitioners' (GP) weighting of symptoms, clinical findings and use of paraclinical investigations when diagnosing acute sinusitis in adults. Questionnaires were sent to 300 representative GPs. Sixty-seven percent answered the questionnaire. The GPs weighted pain and tenderness on application of pressure over the sinuses as the most important symptom and finding. Only a few used paraclinical investigations. The GPs estimated their own diagnostic certainty as being 70%. Detumescent nose-drops were prescribed in 95% of the cases, and antibiotic treatment was given in 50%, most frequently as V-penicillin.

Acute Disease↗

The general practitioner as sports physician.

General practitioners must become more knowledgeable about sports medicine in order both to treat the injured athlete and to provide better rehabilitative treatment and advice on fitness and exercise to other patients. Close involvement with young amateur athletes also helps to keep the older physician "in tune" with the younger generation. Finances remain a major problem for amateur sporting events and sports medicine groups, as well as for the individual physician volunteering his time.

Canada↗

Attitudes of general practitioners in New Zealand to pharmaceutical representatives.

BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical representatives are a vital component of the marketing of pharmaceutical products and an important source of prescribing information for general practitioners. AIM: A study was undertaken to explore the attitudes of New Zealand general practitioners to pharmaceutical representatives. METHOD: A questionnaire survey of 100 general practitioners was undertaken to which 67 general practitioners responded. RESULTS: The provision of practical prescribing advice by representatives and gifts relevant to medicine were seen as desirable activities by many respondents. However, gifts of value considerably greater than suggested acceptable in recent guidelines for general practitioners were also highly favoured by some practitioners. CONCLUSION: Current ethical guidelines setting out the relationship between pharmaceutical representatives and medical practitioners are inadequate and should be based on the need for the general practitioner to become an unbiased promoter of patient health.

Adult↗

General practitioners and psychiatrists: comparison of attitudes to depression using the depression attitude questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Variation in the management of depression may be linked to doctors' attitudes to depression. AIM: A study was undertaken comparing the attitudes to depression between general practitioners and psychiatrists. METHOD: A sample of 74 general practitioners and 65 psychiatrists in Wales was surveyed by postal questionnaire. Attitudes were assessed by the depression attitude questionnaire and patient management was assessed by a questionnaire on prescribing practice. RESULTS: General practitioners differed significantly from psychiatrists in attitudes, particularly in areas covering professional ease in dealing with patients with depression and identification of depression. Those general practitioners who reported use of low antidepressant doses were significantly more likely than general practitioners prescribing standard doses to believe in psychotherapeutic treatments. Users of short-term continuation therapy expressed a lack of therapeutic optimism and comfort in dealing with depressed patients. CONCLUSION: General practitioners and psychiatrists differ significantly in their attitudes to depression. The attitudes which vary among general practitioners reflect practice. The depression attitude questionnaire may prove useful in indicating how educational initiatives to improve primary care detection and management should be directed.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Knowledge and perceptions of a domiciliary hospice service among general practitioners and community nurses.

Within a single district health authority all the general practitioners and community registered general nurses were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding awareness and perceptions of a domiciliary hospice service. Responses were received from 127 doctors (71%) and 58 nurses (80%). Awareness of resources offered by the domiciliary hospice service was high, especially among the 102 respondents with access to the service. Eighty per cent or more of general practitioners and community nurses were satisfied with the amount of information received concerning changes in the patient's condition and who was involved in the care process. However, 33% of nurses agreed that it was difficult to know who had overall responsibility for the patient's care and 28% of nurses felt that their own contribution was under-rated. These findings were reinforced by a number of written statements submitted by the nurses. There was a desire expressed by both general practitioners and community nurses for more educational input from the domiciliary service. Overall, assistance from the service was welcomed and its special skills acknowledged. In the future planning of a comprehensive hospice service the differing needs expressed by doctors and nurses should be taken into account.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Variations in the range of services provided by general practitioners.

The debate about the future role of the general practitioner includes discussion about the range of services which should be on offer in addition to general medical services. Drawing on evidence from a nationally representative sample of 1419 general practitioners this paper examines the reality of what is currently being provided in general practice in the UK. The analyses produce figures that are compatible with the hypothesis that there is a form of creeping specialization taking place with general practitioners tending to provide one type of service at the exclusion of the others. Doctors appeared to cluster into three distinct groups--opportunistic health educators, minor surgeons and those who provide services for women. The implications of these and other findings are discussed.

Family Practice↗

General practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes to the management of hypertension in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether the results from randomized controlled trials influence general practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes to clinical practice. AIM: This study set out to assess general practitioners' knowledge of and attitudes to the management of hypertension in patients aged 65 years and over after the publication of three randomized controlled trials. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey of principals in general practice was undertaken using a self-administrated questionnaire. The study was confined to 35 randomly selected general practices whose patient catchment area lay within the boundary of Northamptonshire Family Health Services Authority. A total of 92 general practitioners from 27 practices responded. The main outcome measures were: the reported use of a protocol to manage elderly patients with hypertension; method and frequency of blood pressure measurement; influence of patients' age on diagnosing and initiating treatment of hypertension; and use of non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapies. RESULTS: Eighty four per cent of the general practitioners reported starting treatment only after measuring blood pressure on three separate occasions; 99% measured blood pressure with the patient seated while 29% also measured blood pressure while the patient was standing. Half of the respondents reported treating patients with isolated systolic hypertension once systolic blood pressure exceeded 179 mmHg. All the general practitioners reported recommending non-pharmacological treatment prior to drug therapy; 83% would use a diuretic as their drug of first choice. CONCLUSION: It appears that despite the publication of several sets of guidelines for the management of hypertension in elderly people, based on randomized controlled trials, there is still considerable variation in the knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners. However, compared with a previous survey in Leicestershire in 1991, the general practitioners in this study reported a lower blood pressure threshold for initiating treatment of elevated blood pressure in elderly patients, including those with isolated systolic hypertension, which may in part be attributed to the introduction of the guidelines.

Aged↗

Use of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction by general practitioners.

The early administration of thrombolytic agents significantly reduces mortality following a myocardial infarct and ideally they could be given by general practitioners when the patient is first seen. However, the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the early stages can be very difficult especially if an electrocardiogram is not available. This may limit the use of thrombolytic drugs by general practitioners. We assessed the accuracy of diagnosis in general practice by asking general practitioners referring patients with chest pain, the likelihood that the event was due to a myocardial infarction and if they would use thrombolysis if it were available. Diagnostic accuracy and appropriate use of thrombolysis was analysed retrospectively, comparing the general practitioner with the admitting hospital doctor. One hundred consecutive patients were studied. The general practitioners accurately diagnosed myocardial infarctions in approximately 45% of cases and would have given thrombolysis inappropriately on 67% of occasions mainly because the final diagnosis in most of these patients was unstable angina rather than infarction. The hospital doctors administered streptokinase inappropriately to 33% of the patients and four had complications during treatment. Of those patients receiving thrombolysis, the average time delay from the general practitioner referring the patient to hospital to the patient being treated was 107 minutes. This study confirms that the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the early stages is difficult and that thrombolytic therapy may be given inappropriately (mainly to patients with unstable angina). We conclude that until the accuracy of diagnosis of myocardial infarction can be improved in general practice it would seem inappropriate for thrombolysis to be given in the community at the moment.

Adult↗

Profile of orthodontic services provided in private practice by general practitioners and specialist orthodontists for an insured population.

In Australia, the proportion, volume and type of orthodontic care provided by general practitioners and orthodontists are largely unknown. The overall objective of this study was to create a profile of orthodontic services provided by general practitioners and orthodontists for a cohort of insured patients using private practices in New South Wales, Australia, from 1st January 1992 to 31st December 1995. Data were derived from claims records submitted by members of a health insurance fund for rebates for fees paid to private practitioners for orthodontic services they received during the study period. Distribution of the volume and type of service provided by general practitioners and orthodontists was compared using the Chi-squared test. Statistical significance was taken at the 5 per cent level. Orthodontic services were provided predominantly by orthodontists (80%). Fixed orthodontic treatment was provided almost exclusively (91%) by orthodontists. The majority of removable appliance services was provided by general practitioners. Orthodontists provided more orthodontic services in the capital city and other metropolitan areas, whereas general practitioners provided more orthodontic services in rural areas. Orthodontists provided more services to members in the highest socio-economic group, whereas general practitioners provided more services to members in the lowest socio-economic group.

Age Factors↗

Consumer use of multiple general practitioners: an Australian epidemiological study.

The aim of this Australian study was to explore the reasons for peoples' choice of general practitioner (GP) in an environment where they have freedom of choice of doctor on every occasion of attendance. A questionnaire was administered by trained research assistants to 555 people during an hour-long interview. Utilization of more than one general practitioner was examined in terms of sociodemographic factors, health status and satisfaction with the last general practice visit. Respondents were more likely to see more than one general practitioner if they had more visits; were dissatisfied with their last consultation with a general practitioner; were younger; were female; and were highly qualified. Further, respondents who described good communication as the rationale for their satisfaction rating for their last general practitioner visit were less likely to have seen more than one general practitioner.

Adult↗