Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “GLYCOSURIA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources

The limited clinical value of home urine testing by diabetic patients.

To investigate the value of home urine glucose testing in assessing chronic diabetic glucose control, the authors compared patients' glycosuria patterns with their mean blood glucose (MBG) levels calculated from glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb Alc). One hundred and twenty-one patients who regularly checked their urines reported on the frequencies of glycosuria over the preceding ten weeks. There was substantial overlap in the glycosuria patterns of patients at different levels of MBG. Glycosuria was not detectable in only 44% of patients with good control (MBG less than or equal to 150 mg/dl). The probability of such good control given no glycosuria was only 26%. Similarly, frequent glycosuria was reported by only 27% of patients with poor control (MGB greater than 250 mg/dl). The probability of such poor control given frequent glycosuria was only 34%. Because home urine testing cannot reliably identify good or poor control, it has a very limited role in assessing patients' chronic glucose control.

Adolescent↗

Screening for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM): how often should it be performed?

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether a screening programme for diabetes repeated after an interval of 30 months is worthwhile both in terms of yield of new cases and continued high response rate. METHODS: Self testing for postprandial glycosuria was used as it has been shown to have a good response rate, a good yield of cases of diabetes, and a sensitivity and specificity which compares favourably with more expensive and invasive screening methods. A total of 3231 subjects aged 45-70 years in one practice were screened on two occasions 30 months apart. Eighty seven subjects known to have diabetes were excluded. This number included five new patients who had presented since the initial screen; two of whom had moved into the practice, one who screened positive at the initial screen but failed to attend for the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and two subjects who had screened negative, the first presenting 24 months after screening. RESULTS: At repeat screening the return rate was lower than at the first screening (72.5% v 79.2%, P < 0.0001). Glycosuria was detected in 52 subjects (2.3%), at the repeat screening, similar to that at the initial screen. Attendance for the OGTT after a positive screening test was 93.2%. Only six subjects of the 24 with glycosuria but normal glucose tolerance at initial screen were found to have glycosuria again; repeat OGTTs were all normal. Of the remaining 46 subjects, 10 had non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and five impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). The number of subjects with diabetes was not significantly different from that at the initial screening (0.44% v 0.72%, P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat screening after 30 months has a high response rate, similar rate of detection of glycosuria, and a further yield of 0.44% of newly diagnosed cases of diabetes. A screening programme detecting postprandial glycosuria identifies additional diabetic subjects 30 months after a previous screening programme.

Age Factors↗

No need for glycosuria/proteinuria screen in pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: More than 22 million prenatal visits occur in the US each year. Each pregnant woman averages 7 visits. Most include urine testing for glucose and protein to screen for gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. Is there sufficient scientific evidence to support this routine practice? METHODS: We searched Medline (1966-2004), the Cochrane review, AHRQ National Guideline Clearinghouse, the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, and Google, searching for studies on proteinuria or glycosuria in pregnancy. The reference list of each article reviewed was examined for additional studies, but none were identified. We found 6 studies investigating glycosuria as a predictor for gestational diabetes mellitus, or proteinuria as a predictor for preeclampsia (1 examined both). Because every study used different dipstick methods of determining results, or definitions of abnormal, each was evaluated separately. RESULTS: Glycosuria is found at some point in about 50% of pregnant women; it is believed to be due to an increased glomerular filtration rate. The renal threshold for glucose is highly variable and may lead to a positive test result for glycosuria despite normal blood sugar. High intake of ascorbic acid or high urinary ketone levels may result in false-positive results. Four published studies assessed the value of glycosuria as a screen for gestational diabetes. All used urine dipsticks. Three of the 4 most likely overestimate the sensitivity of glycosuria for predicting gestational diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Routine dipstick screening for protein and glucose at each prenatal visit should be abandoned. Women who are known or perceived to be at high risk for gestational diabetes or preeclampsia should continue to be monitored closely at the discretion of their clinician.

Biomarkers↗

Delayed (>3 weeks) postnatal corticosteroids for chronic lung disease in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Many preterm babies who survive, having had respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) or not, go on to develop chronic lung disease (CLD). This is probably due to persistence of inflammation in the lung. Corticosteroids have powerful anti-inflammatory effects and have been used to treat established CLD. However it is unclear whether any beneficial effects outweigh the adverse effects of these drugs. OBJECTIVES: To determine if late (> 3 weeks) postnatal corticosteroid treatment vs control (placebo or nothing) is of benefit in the treatment of chronic lung disease (CLD) in the preterm infant. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials of postnatal corticosteroid therapy were sought from the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, the Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials, Medline, hand searching paediatric and perinatal journals, examining previous review articles and information received from practising neonatologists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of postnatal corticosteroid treatment initiated at > 3 weeks of age in preterm infants with CLD were selected for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality before discharge, failure to extubate, infection, hyperglycaemia, hypertension, severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), gastrointestinal bleeding, bowel perforation, echodensities on ultrasound scan of brain, need for home oxygen, glycosuria, need for late rescue with dexamethasone, cerebral palsy in survivors and blindness in survivors were abstracted and analysed using Revman 4.0.4. MAIN RESULTS: Delayed steroid treatment had no effect on mortality. The only beneficial effects were reductions in failure to extubate by 7 or 28 days, need for late rescue treatment with dexamethasone, chronic lung disease at 36 weeks, and discharge to home on oxygen therapy. There was no increase in risk of infection, necrotising enterocolitis, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Short-term adverse affects included hyperglycaemia, glycosuria and hypertension. There was an increase in severe retinopathy of prematurity, but no effect on blindness. There were increases in long-term neurologic sequelae including abnormal neurologic examination and cerebral palsy, the latter of borderline statistical significance. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of late corticosteroid therapy may not outweigh actual or potential adverse effects. There is a worrying increase in adverse neurological outcomes in infants treated with postnatal steroids (see also Review of Early Postnatal corticosteroids). Corticosteroids should be reserved for infants who cannot be weaned from mechanical ventilation. The dose of dexamethasone and the duration of any course of treatment should be minimised.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗