Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fees”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Outcome and utilization differences for older persons with stroke in HMO and fee-for-service systems.

OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment and outcomes for older persons with stroke in Medicare health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and fee-for-service (FFS) systems. DESIGN: Inception cohort stratified by payer and followed for 1 year. SETTING: Six HMOs and five FFS systems with large Medicare populations in the West, Midwest, and Eastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 429 randomly selected stroke patients receiving rehabilitation in nursing homes or rehabilitation hospitals (RHs) from June 1993 to June 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Improvement in activities of daily living (ADLs) during rehabilitation, and ADL recovery, community residence, and utilization until 12 months after stroke. Outcomes were adjusted for premorbid function, marital status, comorbid illness, posthospital function, cognition, psychological problems, and stroke deficits. RESULTS: At baseline, HMO patients were more likely to be married, and less likely to be blind or have psychiatric diagnoses. HMO patients had shorter hospitalizations (P < .001), were less likely to be admitted to RHs (13% vs 85%, P < .001), and received fewer therapy and physician specialist visits (P < .001) but more home health visits (P < .001). During rehabilitation, FFS patients made greater improvement in ADLs (difference, 0.73 ADLs; 95% CI, .37-1.09). At 1 year, there was no difference in ADL recovery (difference, -0.24 ADL; 95% CI, -0.64-0.16), but FFS patients were more likely to reside in the community (adjusted OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), and HMO patients were more likely to reside in nursing homes (adjusted OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.5). CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that short-term functional outcomes and eventual community residence rates are poorer for Medicare HMO patients with stroke than for stroke patients receiving FFS care, consistent with the lower intensity of rehabilitation (in nursing homes vs RHs) and less specialty physician care.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Assessment of suitability for low-fee control psychoanalysis: some theoretical and technical considerations.

In the assessment of suitability for low-fee control analysis, various factors may interfere with successful referral, evaluation, and disposition. Variables within the referring analyst, patient, candidate, and supervisor are examined in their interaction with the circumstances of the assessment enterprise. Issues of competence, self-esteem, and oedipal rivalry, as well as guilt feelings, concerns about rejection, and other conflicts may be mobilized and may prevent a successful outcome. Clinical data from three assessments are presented and discussed. The concept of an assessment process, analogous to the psychoanalytic process, is proposed. In this process, manifestations of the patient's intrapsychic life and indicators of potential transferences emerge in the context of the analysis of the patient's reactions to the assessment. Potential sources of interference with the assessment process are identified, and measures to avoid them are suggested.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Satisfaction with medical care among elderly people in fee-for-service care and an HMO.

This study investigates satisfaction with care among elderly Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO) and beneficiaries in fee-for-service (FFS) care in the same geographic area. Satisfaction with two dimensions of care, access/quality and costs, are examined, to investigate differences in enrollee/FFS evaluation of these dimensions of care as well as predictors of satisfaction with care. In addition, satisfaction among healthy and chronically ill elderly people in these two care settings is explored. Results indicate higher satisfaction with access/quality of care among those in FFS and higher satisfaction with costs among HMO enrollees. These relationships hold controlling for other variables and among the chronically ill elderly. Sources of variation in satisfaction are somewhat different among the HMO and FFS elderly. Satisfaction with paperwork and ease of getting to care, however, influences satisfaction with other aspects of care in both populations.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction among Medicare beneficiaries in different models of health maintenance organizations and fee-for-service care.

Based on a randomly selected nationwide sample of Medicare beneficiaries, this study analyzes changes in patient satisfaction over a one year period for beneficiaries receiving care in a variety of delivery settings: fee for service, group model HMO, staff model HMO, and Independent Practice Association model HMO. The findings reveal the patient satisfaction changes significantly over a one year period, from lower levels of satisfaction to higher levels of satisfaction. The primary explanation for this change in satisfaction is a decline in health status over the same one year period. Additional differences in satisfaction with care were observed for Medicare beneficiaries served by different types of delivery settings with varying degrees of utilization controls.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Survival and treatment for colorectal cancer Medicare patients in two group/staff health maintenance organizations and the fee-for-service setting.

The current study compares treatment use and long-term survival in colorectal cancer patients between Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in two large prepaid group/staff health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and the fee-for-service (FFS) setting. The study is based on 15,352 colorectal cancer cases diagnosed between 1985 and 1992 and followed through 1995. Survival differences between the HMO and FFS cases were assessed using Cox regression. Treatment differences were evaluated using logistic regression. HMO cases had a lower overall mortality than did FFS cases but not a significantly lower colorectal cancer-specific mortality. Use of surgical resection was similar between HMO and FFS cases. However, rectal cancer cases in the HMOs were more likely to receive postsurgical radiation therapy than FFS cases. Superior overall survival in the HMOs may be the result of increased colorectal cancer screening, greater use of adjuvant therapies, and selection of healthier individuals.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Measuring access to effective care among elderly medicare enrollees in managed and Fee-for-Service care: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare access to effective care among elderly Medicare patients in a Staff Model and Group Model HMO and in Fee-for-Service (FFS) care. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort study design, using claims and automated medical record data to compare achievement on quality indicators for elderly Medicare recipients. Secondary data were collected from 1) HMO data sets and 2) Medicare claims files for the time period 1994-95. All subjects were Medicare enrollees in a defined area of New England: those enrolled in two divisions of a managed care plan with different physician payment arrangements: a staff model, and a group model; and the Medicare FFS population. We abstracted information on indicators covering several domains: preventive, diagnosis-specific, and chronic disease care. RESULTS: On the indicators we created and tested, access in the single managed care plan under study was comparable to or better than FFS care in the same geographic region. Percent of Medicare recipients with breast cancer screening was 36 percentage points higher in the staff model versus FFS (95% confidence interval 34-38 percentage points). Follow up after hospitalization for myocardial infarction was 20 percentage points higher in the group model than in FFS (95% confidence interval 14-26 percentage points). CONCLUSION: According to indicators developed for use in both claims and automated medical record data, access to care for elderly Medicare beneficiaries in one large managed care organization was as good as or better than that in FFS care in the same geographic area.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Management of multiple sclerosis across managed care and fee-for-service systems.

OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare care for adults with MS across managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) health systems. METHODS: The authors sampled adults with MS having physician visits over a 2-year period from a group model health maintenance organization (HMO) in southern California, from a midwestern independent practice association (IPA) model managed care plan, and from the FFS portion of the practices of a random sample of southern California neurologists. The authors mailed surveys to subjects in mid-1996; 930 of 1,164 (80%) of those eligible responded. The authors measured sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, management of recent changes in mobility, bladder control, and fatigue, use of a disease-modifying agent, assessment of general health symptoms and issues, and unmet information needs. The authors adjusted comparisons between systems for comorbidity, disease severity, and disease type. RESULTS: The groups differed on most sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. There were few differences in symptom management; differences that did exist tended toward more referrals or treatment for the FFS group. Access to the disease-modifying agent available at the time of the survey did not differ across systems, although patients' perceptions of the rationale for not using the drug did vary. General health issues and symptoms were more often assessed in the FFS and IPA systems than in the HMO, but improvement was needed across all three systems of care. There were substantial unmet information needs in all groups and especially high ones in the FFS and HMO samples. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to improve care for people with MS should be developed and evaluated, particularly in areas like symptom assessment and meeting patient information needs. Where variations in service delivery exist, longitudinal studies are also needed to evaluate the potential impact on outcomes and to evaluate reasons for variation.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1992

Japan: maintaining equity through regulated fees.

Japan was the first non-Western country to introduce social insurance and the first to achieve universal coverage. It has been very successful in helping to bring about high health levels among its citizens at reasonable cost. Consequently, it provides a unique model for the newly industrialized countries of how to adapt modern technologies in structuring their own health care systems. Japan's financing system is organized by the government. Coverage is mandated for all citizens and is supplied by a number of insurance plans, whose variety reflects the differences in their development. The country relies mainly on the private provision of health care, delivered from physician-owned clinics and hospitals. The most prestigious facilities, however, are the public hospitals. Services are fragmented between clinics and hospitals, which compete for a share of the patients in their area. Patients can choose where to seek medical services. Providers are paid by a nationally uniform method and rate, which are decided by one central agency. Increases in payment rates are tied to the ceiling set by the government's general expenditure limitations. A uniform fee schedule has helped to control costs and to ensure equitable access. Challenges remaining for Japan's health care system are caring for an increasingly elderly population and ensuring quality of care.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed1982

Some pitfalls in creating competition between HMOs and fee-for-service delivery.

This paper examines four propositions inherent in competitive approaches to containing the growth of health care expenditures: (1) that health maintenance organizations can deliver health care less expensively than the fee-for-service system; (2) that under certain competitive conditions, HMOs would prosper; (3) that HMO successes would force FFS insurers and providers to become more efficient; and (4) that creating the competitive conditions would be politically feasible. Reasons for doubting the latter three propositions are plentiful, and the strategy is therefore judged unlikely to succeed.

Economic Competition↗
PubMed1976

Social work fees in medical care: a review of the literature and report of a survey.

This paper is based on a study undertaken to determine the advisability of establishing fees for social work service in a Family Practice Residency Program as a way of providing a funding base to assure continuing this professional service in the model Family Practice Unit at the University of Washington; and as a way of providing social worker services in other medical clinics.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1998

Medicaid beneficiaries' experiences in HMO and fee-for-service health care.

How do HMO-enrolled Medicaid beneficiaries' ratings of access to, and satisfaction with, their health care compare with the ratings of those beneficiaries receiving care in fee-for-service settings? Do poor single mothers report differences in access to, and satisfaction with, their HMO health care compared with those living in other family structures? These questions were examined with survey data from 961 California Medicaid recipients in 1991. Medicaid recipients enrolled in HMOs reported more difficulty gaining access to, and less satisfaction with, various aspects of the health care system. HMO-enrolled single mothers reported particularly negative experiences with their health care. The findings suggest a potential lack of fit between the health needs of the poor and the aims of managed health care.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of preventive care in Medicaid managed care and Medicaid fee for service in institutions and private practices.

OBJECTIVE: To compare preventive screening for children in Medicaid managed care (MMC) with children in Medicaid fee for service (M-FFS) in private and institutional settings. METHODS: The sample included randomly selected institutions and private practice physicians in New York City. Within setting, children in MMC and M-FFS were sampled randomly and charts reviewed for immunizations and lead and anemia screening. RESULTS: In both institutions and private practices, children enrolled in MMC appeared more likely to be up-to-date than their M-FFS counterparts for immunizations (institution, P <.01; private practice, P <.05), lead screening (institution, P <.01; private practice, P <.01), and anemia screening (institution, P <.01; private practice, P <.01). However, children in MMC had more visits (P <.01) and were followed up for a longer time (P <.01). After controlling for these variables, effects of MMC diminished and only remained significant for screening among private physicians. When considering 10 different attributes of managed care plans, no clear pattern of association with better preventive care services was observed. CONCLUSION: The positive effect of managed care on preventive care services was largely explained by more visits and longer follow-up time; however, there were differences between institutions and private practices, with enrollment in MMC associated with some positive effect on screenings in private practices.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed1995

Fee-for-data: a strategy to open the HMO black box.

This paper outlines a simple proposal to maintain utilization data in the face of managed care growth. Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) would be required to submit claims (encounter-level data) and in return would be paid a percentage of what Medicare would pay fee-for-service providers. The capitation payment rate would be lowered to maintain budget-neutrality. This proposal would enable the collection of key data that might not otherwise be captured in a Medicare program dominated by HMOs and other forms of managed care. The data are necessary to drive Medicare policies and to gauge the impact of changes to the program. The program would be well advised to make the small additional investment to make the data system complete. The key issue in implementing such a proposal will be HMOs' ability to generate those data at reasonable cost.

Capitation Fee↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Defining a future for fee-for-service Medicare.

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) provides economic incentives that favor health plans over traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. This reflects an ideological preference for private plans rather than government-administered pricing and recognition that private plans can use tools effectively to improve quality. However, enrollment projections indicate that FFS will continue to attract the majority of beneficiaries for years to come. We argue that MMA's contractor reform provisions create the opportunity to build critical FFS infrastructure, and contractors have the potential to encourage quality and manage utilization to compete with private plans in a modernized Medicare.

Advisory Committees↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Population-based disease management under fee-for-service Medicare.

Medicare policymakers are considering testing population-based disease management (PDM) programs under fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare as a way to improve health and cost outcomes for selected subgroups of chronically ill beneficiaries. This paper provides a brief overview of how PDM programs are evolving in the private sector and describes how they differ from other approaches already being tested in Medicare disease management demonstrations. It also discusses some key opportunities and issues to be considered in adapting PDM programs for testing in the FFS Medicare context.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1983

Mental health treatment and medical care utilization in a fee-for-service system: outpatient mental health treatment following the onset of a chronic disease.

Charges for medical services of persons covered by the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Federal Employees Program from 1974 through 1978 who were first diagnosed as having one of four chronic diseases in 1975 and within one year began mental health treatment (MHT) were compared with persons who also were first diagnosed as having one of these diseases in 1975 but had no subsequent MHT. In the third year following the diagnosis, those having seven to 20 MHT visits had medical charges $309 lower and those having over 21 MHT visits had medical charges $284 lower than the comparison group. The savings in medical charges over three years of the group having seven to 20 MHT visits were a function of lower use of inpatient services and roughly equaled the cost of 20 MHT visits. Outpatient mental health treatment can be included in a fee-for-service medical care system to improve the quality and appropriateness of care and, if not extensive, may also serve to lower medical care costs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

HMO vs fee-for-service care of older persons with acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) continue to grow in number and in their enrollment of Medicare recipients. They are also increasingly viewed as organizational structures that might contribute to control of health care costs. Yet little is known about the quality of care that elderly HMO enrollees receive. METHODS: We compared patients from three HMOs to a fee-for-service (FFS) sample that was national in scope. Sickness at admission, the quality of process of care, and mortality were assessed for patients aged 65 years and older who had been hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: After adjustment for sickness at admission, there were no significant mortality differences between the HMO and FFS groups at either 30 (23.2% vs 23.5%) or 180 days (34.4% vs 34.5%) after admission. Compliance with process criteria was higher for the HMO group as a whole (P < .05). The HMOs had greater compliance with three of five scales measuring different aspects of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that older patients from our participating HMOs who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction received hospital care that was generally better in terms of process than that received by patients in a national FFS sample.

Age Factors↗