Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Endoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Endoscopic balloon dilatation is a safe method in the management of common bile duct stones.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a widely accepted treatment for patients with common bile duct stones. Despite improvement in this technique, endoscopic sphincterotomy is still associated with some biliary complications. Endoscopic balloon dilatation is a less traumatic and sphincter preserving method for removal of common bile duct stones. However, the results of controlled studies in comparison with these two methods are contradictory. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy in Chinese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients with common bile duct stones on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to endoscopic balloon dilatation or endoscopic sphincterotomy. Endoscopic balloon dilatation was performed by using a balloon dilator to dilate the sphincter for 5 min. The common bile duct stones were then removed by a Dormia basket after endoscopic balloon dilatation or endoscopic sphincterotomy. Mechanical lithotripsy was performed if the stones were difficult to remove by Dormia basket. After discharge, patients were regularly followed up for biliary complications. RESULTS: The successful bile duct stone clearance rate was 94.1% in endoscopic balloon dilatation group and 100% in endoscopic sphincterotomy group. Post-procedural significant haemorrhage was higher in endoscopic sphincterotomy group than in endoscopic balloon dilatation group (14/53 versus 1/48, P < 0.001). The bleeding patient from endoscopic balloon dilatation group was a case of uremia and bleeding occurred 48 h after endoscopic balloon dilatation. All the patients with post-procedural haemorrhage were controlled endoscopically. The post-procedural serum amylase level showed no significant difference in both groups and none of them developed clinical pancreatitis. After a mean 16 months follow-up, three patients (6.3%) in endoscopic balloon dilatation group and four patients (7.5%) in endoscopic sphincterotomy group developed recurrent common bile duct stones. The recurrent common bile duct stones were multiple and muddy in consistency. They were successfully removed endoscopically. CONCLUSION: Both endoscopic balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy are safe and effective techniques for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Endoscopic balloon dilatation can be safely applied in patients with coagulopathy and does not increase the incidence of pancreatitis or bleeding.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prospective randomized trial of endoscopic sclerotherapy versus variceal band ligation for esophageal varices: influence on gastropathy, gastric varices and variceal recurrence.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic sclerotherapy are both recommended for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. To compare their efficacy, their influence on gastric varices and the development of portal gastropathy, 95 patients with variceal bleeding were studied. METHODS: The patients were randomized to receive weekly endoscopic sclerotherapy using alcohol (n=48) or endoscopic variceal ligation (n=47). The endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal ligation groups were comparable in etiology, severity of liver disease and grade of varices. RESULTS: In the arrest of acute bleed, endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal ligation were comparable (86% vs. 80%, p=ns). Endoscopic variceal ligation as compared to endoscopic sclerotherapy, obliterated esophageal varices in fewer sessions (4.1+/-1.2 vs. 5.2+/-1.8, p<0.01) and a shorter time (4.4+/-1.3 vs. 6.9+/-3.4 wk, p<0.01). Three (6.4%) patients bled after endoscopic variceal ligation and 10 (20.8%) after endoscopic sclerotherapy (p<0.05). The actuarial percentage of variceal recurrence during a follow-up of 8.5+/-4.4 months, was higher after endoscopic variceal ligation than endoscopic sclerotherapy (28.7% vs 7.5%, p<0.05). Esophageal stricture formation after endoscopic sclerotherapy occurred in five (10.4%) patients, but in none after endoscopic variceal ligation. Significantly more patients developed gastropathy after endoscopic sclerotherapy than ligation (20.5% vs. 2.3%; p=0.02). Endoscopic sclerotherapy (52%) and endoscopic variceal ligation (59%) were equally effective in obliterating the lesser curve gastric varices. Six patients died: three in each group. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal ligation were equally effective in controlling acute bleed; (ii) endoscopic ligation achieved variceal obliteration faster and in fewer treatment sessions; (iii) endoscopic variceal ligation had a significantly lower rate of development of portal gastropathy and rebleeding, (iv) while both techniques influenced gastric varices equally, there was significantly higher esophageal variceal recurrence after endoscopic variceal ligation than sclerotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal treatment: Endoscopic sclerotherapy, band ligation and combined therapy--long-term results.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the long-term results of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation in secondary prophylaxis on variceal eradication and to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation combination in resistant cases. METHODS: The results of the patients who underwent endoscopic sclerotherapy (n=47 31M/16F, 49.9+/-16.1 years) and endoscopic band ligation (n=72 56M/16F, 46.6+/-14.1 years) were compared. The results of patients whose varices could not be eradicated who were treated with endoscopic band ligation and combined endoscopic sclerotherapy (combined group, n=62 49M/13F, 48.8+/-12.7 years) are also given. Patients were evaluated for portal hypertension etiology, Child score, fundal varices-portal hypertensive gastropathy presence according to first and last endoscopic findings, varices eradication, rebleeding, recurrence and complication rates. RESULTS: 181 patients were followed for 35.2+/- 25.6 (6-123) months. Varices eradication and recurrence rates were 93.6% and 44.7% for endoscopic sclerotherapy, and 90.3% and 47.2% for endoscopic band ligation (p>0.05). The number of sessions for eradication were 6.6+/-4.0 and 2.5+/-1.6 for endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation groups, respectively (p<0.05). Rebleeding rates were 16.3% for endoscopic sclerotherapy and 6.1% for endoscopic band ligation (p>0.05). In the combined group, although the rebleeding rate was 34.4%, which was as expected significantly higher than that of endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation, variceal eradication and the recurrence rates were 82.3% and 50.0%, similar to endoscopic sclerotherapy and endoscopic band ligation, and the number of sessions for eradication was 6.8+/-3.5. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic band ligation is the most suitable method for varices eradication, but there is a group of patients resistant to endoscopic band ligation. In this patient group, the addition of endoscopic sclerotherapy to endoscopic band ligation was a suitable and effective technique in order to achieve variceal eradication.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Echo-endoscopy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is highly accurate in diagnosing choledocholithiasis, but it is the most invasive of the available methods. Endoscopic ultrasonography is a very accurate test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis with a risk of complications similar to that of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. AIM: To compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to analyze endoscopic ultrasound results according to stone size and common bile duct diameter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen patients with symptomatic gallstones were admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sixty-eight of them (31.7%) had a dilated common bile duct and/or hepatic biochemical parameter abnormalities. They were submitted to endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Sphincterotomy and sweeping of the common bile duct were performed if endoscopic ultrasonography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were considered positive for choledocholithiasis. After sphincterotomy and common bile duct clearance the largest stone was retrieved for measurement. Endoscopic or surgical explorations of the common bile duct were considered the gold-standard methods for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. RESULTS: All 68 patients were submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography with confirmation of the presence of gallstones. Endoscopic ultrasonography was a more sensitivity test than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (97% vs. 67%) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. When stones >4.0 mm were analyzed, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography presented similar results (96% vs. 90%). Neither the size of the stone nor the common bile duct diameter had influence on endoscopic ultrasonographic performance. CONCLUSIONS: For a group of patients with an intermediate or moderate risk with respect to the likelihood of having common bile duct stones, endoscopic ultrasonography is a better test for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis when compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography mainly for small-sized calculi.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess the influence of the skill and experience of the endoscopist on the success and risk of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques. METHODS: The outcome of all endoscopic sphincterotomies (n = 1335) carried out between 1988 and 1995 were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the endoscopist performing the procedure. Endoscopists were differentiated according to whether they had previous experience with endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques (n > 100) and the frequency of endoscopic sphincterotomy during the study period (>40, 26 to 40, 10 to 25, <10 per year). RESULTS: Indications for endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques and technical execution had only a minor influence on the results of endoscopic sphincterotomy and were comparable for the individual endoscopists. The overall success rate of endoscopic sphincterotomy was 94.4% and did not significantly differ among the endoscopists. The overall complication rate of endoscopic sphincterotomy was 7.3%. Endoscopists learning endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques with a case frequency of less than 10 procedures per year had a consistently high complication rate (10.5%). Those learning endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques with a case frequency of more than 25 procedures per year had an above-average complication rate for their first 40 endoscopic sphincterotomy procedures and a significant decrease in complication rate as the number of procedures increased. The complication rate for experienced endoscopists was 7.7%. There were distinct and, in one case, significant differences in complication rates between individual endoscopists (11.5% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.01). However, when corrected for multiple testing, there were no significant differences at the p < 0. 05 level. The endoscopic sphincterotomy frequency of the endoscopist was the only significant risk factor for complications. Endoscopists with a frequency of more than 40 procedures per year had a significantly lower complication rate (5.6%) than endoscopists with a lower case frequency (9.3%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A low endoscopic sphincterotomy frequency is, even for endoscopists with previous experience with the procedure, a risk factor for complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy. The learning of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques requires a minimum of 40 procedures, but also after 100 procedures a further decrease of the complication rate can be expected.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Assessment of safety and feasibility of spinal endoscope in the thoracic and lumbar region: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscope has been used far less in the spinal region than in the intracranial cavity. One of the reasons is its safety and feasibility has not been established. To evaluate its safety and feasibility, we performed preliminary cadaveric study prior to clinical endoscopic intervention in the thoracic and lumbar spinal canal. METHODS: The endoscope that had a directable tip with external diameters of 2.2mm was used in this study. The endoscope was inserted percutaneously in the lumbar region (lumbar puncture method) in nine cadavers and was advanced rostrally under endoscopic monitoring. In advancing the endoscope to the upper thoracic region, dorsal, lateral and ventral route was applied. When the endoscope was advanced to the upper thoracic region, vertebral canal from Th 1 to L4 was opened to examine whether there were any injuries to spinal cord and nerves. RESULTS: The endoscope could be manipulated and advanced under endoscopic image in the lumbar region. However, the filum terminale could not be detected under endoscopic view. In the thoracic region, the endoscope could be advanced in dorsal and lateral route. However, in advancing the endoscope in ventral route, the endoscope could not be advanced more rostrally. In cadavers that the endoscope was advanced in dorsal and lateral route, macroscopic and microscopic investigation revealed no injuries including compression marks or trace of cord were observed on the surface of the spinal cord and nerves. CONCLUSIONS: From this preliminary cadaver study, the safe route to advance the endoscope from the lumbar to the thoracic region was established and possibilities of clinical interventions in safe methods could be suggested.

Cadaver↗
PubMed2000

[Inverted papilloma of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Long-term outcome of endoscopic endonasal resection].

There is still some skepticism about endoscopic endonasal resection of inverted papillomas. We conducted a long-term retrospective study and examined 104 patients (82 male, 22 female) with inverted papilloma who were operated at the ENT-Department of the University of Erlangen between 1974 and 1997. The endoscopic approach was chosen in each case, either alone or in combination with external approaches. In 64.4% (67 cases), tumors of all T-classes were resected by endoscopic approach alone (T1:17.9%, T2:23.9%, T3:41.8%, T4:16.4%). For the rest of the patients an additional transoral and transfacial approach was necessary due to difficult tumor localization (T2:24.3%, T3:29.7%, T4:45.9%). The mean age of the patients was 55 years. The recurrence rate after primary endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery was 22.4% (15/67) and after combined endoscopic and external surgery 16.2% (6/37). Second salvage surgery after endoscopic sinus surgery was performed again endonasally in 46% (7/15) and externally in 53.3% (8/15). The recurrence rate after the endonasal approach was now 57.1% (4/7) and 50% (4/8) after external surgery. Third salvage surgery was performed again endoscopically in four cases and externally in four cases. The recurrence rate in both groups was 50% each, so that up to six operations, either endoscopically or externally, were necessary for complete tumor resection. The longest period for a tumor recurrence was 3.4 years after endoscopic sinus surgery and 9 years after combined endoscopic and external surgery. A tumor recurrence after endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery that could not be managed endoscopically again occurred in 12%. Tumor localization is the limiting factor for endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery of inverted papilloma. However, in 64.4% of cases, endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery alone was performed successfully without any loss of one patient. Long-term follow-up is necessary since the recurrence of tumor can happen after a long time. Endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery of inverted papilloma is safe and should be preferred due to its minimal invasive character.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Factors associated with failure of endoscopic injection haemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of a submucosal injection of adrenaline solution in endoscopic haemostasis is well documented in patients suffering from peptic ulcer bleeding. After treatment, however, a significant number of patients continue to bleed or rebleed, and require emergency surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to define factors associated with the failure of endoscopic injection haemostatic therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding. METHODS: In the period 1992 to 1998, we prospectively studied all patients suffering from peptic ulcer bleeding and identified endoscopically as being either bleeding actively or carrying a visible vessel. A total of 427 patients (343 men and 84 women; mean age 58.6 +/- 16.6 years) were all subjected to endoscopic injection with adrenaline solution on an emergency basis. Patients who eventually required surgical intervention for permanent haemostasis were considered as endoscopic haemostasis failures, whereas those who did not were considered as endoscopic treatment successes. We evaluated all clinical and endoscopic parameters that might have been related to failure of endoscopic injection therapy. RESULTS: Endoscopic injection haemostasis was successful in 341 patients (79.9%) and a failure in 86 (20.1%) who finally underwent emergency surgical haemostasis. On analysing the examined parameters, failure was significantly related to shock on admission (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.33, 6.97), spurt bleeding at endoscopy (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.51, 3.98), posteriorly located duodenal ulcer (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.37, 7.01) and anastomotic ulcer (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.37, 7.29). Endoscopic injection haemostasis therapy was less effective in patients with chronic ulcers compared to those who had acute NSAID-related ulcers. A history of peptic ulcer (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.14, 3.05), previous peptic ulcer bleeding (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.51, 3.98) or non-use of NSAIDs (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.33, 4.62) were negative predictors for the outcome of endoscopic haemostasis. CONCLUSION: With the use of specific clinical and endoscopic characteristics it is possible to define a subgroup of high-risk patients for continued bleeding or rebleeding despite endoscopic injection therapy. These patients may be candidates for intensive monitoring, early surgical intervention or possibly complementary endoscopic haemostatic methods.

Epinephrine↗