Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clarithromycin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

In vitro susceptibilities of 180 clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.

One hundred eighty consecutive, unduplicate isolates of Haemophilus influenzae from clinical specimens collected from November 1994 through February 1995 in nine general hospitals throughout Belgium were examined for beta-lactamase production using a nitrocefin-based test, and for their in vitro susceptibilities to ampicillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, clarithromycin and azithromycin by means of the NCCLS agar dilution test. The isolates were all from respiratory tract specimens. The prevalence of capsular type b was 1.1%, and the overall rate of beta-lactamase production 16.7%. Rates of beta-lactamase production were higher in isolates from children (22.0%) than in those from adults (15.3%), and in isolates from upper respiratory tract specimens (22.0%) than in those from the lower respiratory tract (15.1%). Beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin resistance amounted to 1.1%. Cefotaxime had the highest activity on a weight basis [MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) for 50% of the isolates tested (MIC50) < or = 0.06 microgram/ml], followed by ampicillin (MIC50 of 0.25 microgram/ml), amoxycillin/clavulanate and cefuroxime (MIC50 of 0.5 microgram/ml), azithromycin (MIC50 of 2 micrograms/ml), cefaclor (MIC50 of 4 micrograms/ml), and clarithromycin (MIC50 of 8 micrograms/ml). Cefotaxime was also the most active drug in terms of susceptibility rates of the isolates (100.0%), followed by amoxycillin/clavulanate and azithromycin (98.9%), cefuroxime (97.2%), cefaclor (89.4%), clarithromycin (82.8%), and ampicillin (82.2%). In conclusion, amoxycillin/clavulanate and cefuroxime retain an excellent activity against H. influenzae, while cefaclor lost some of its activity. The rate of susceptibility to azithromycin was markedly higher than that to clarithromycin; however, its ability to accumulate intracellularly while concentrations in serum and interstitial fluid remain low, should be considered, as it may represent a major drawback to its use in H. influenzae infections.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Early results (at 6 months) with intermittent clarithromycin-including regimens for lung disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex.

We initiated a prospective noncomparative trial of treatment for lung disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients, with a regimen of clarithromycin (1000 mg), rifabutin (300-600 mg), and ethambutol (25 mg/kg) administered 3 times per week. Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. Twelve (20%) were lost to follow-up, and 6 (10%) developed clarithromycin intolerance. The remaining 41 patients (69%) completed the initial 6 months of therapy. The sputum of 32 of these patients (78%) converted to negative. When results were compared with the sputum response rates at 6 months in previous studies with a regimen including daily clarithromycin and regimens including intermittent (3 times per week) azithromycin with the same companion drugs, no differences in treatment responses were evident. Adverse reactions related to rifabutin were a major problem, and for 24 (41%) of 59 patients the dosage was decreased or the drug was withdrawn. Intermittent (3 times per week) administration of clarithromycin appears to be as effective as daily administration in effecting sputum conversion in pulmonary MAC disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A randomized, double-blind trial comparing azithromycin and clarithromycin in the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.

Two hundred and forty-six patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who also had disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex received either azithromycin 250 mg every day, azithromycin 600 mg every day, or clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day, each combined with ethambutol, for 24 weeks. Samples drawn from patients were cultured and clinically assessed every 3 weeks up to week 12, then monthly thereafter through week 24 of double-blind therapy and every 3 months while on open-label therapy through the conclusion of the trial. The azithromycin 250 mg arm of the study was dropped after an interim analysis showed a lower rate of clearance of bacteremia. At 24 weeks of therapy, the likelihood of patients' developing 2 consecutive negative cultures (46% vs. 56%, P=.24) or 1 negative culture (59% vs. 61%, P=.80) was similar for azithromycin 600 mg (n=68) and clarithromycin (n=57), respectively. The likelihood of relapse was 39% versus 27% (P=.21) on azithromycin compared with clarithromycin, respectively. Of the 6 patients who experienced relapse, none of those randomized to receive azithromycin developed isolates resistant to macrolides, compared with 2 of 3 patients randomized to receive clarithromycin [corrected]. Mortality was similar in patients comprising each arm of the study (69% vs. 63%; hazard, 95.1% confidence interval, 1.1 [0.7, 1.7]). Azithromycin 600 mg, when given in combination with ethambutol, is an effective agent for the treatment of disseminated M. avium disease in patients infected with HIV.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2001

Macrolide therapy of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: 10 days of macrolide therapy (clarithromycin) is more effective in streptococcal eradication than 5 days (azithromycin).

We compared recommended doses of 2 oral macrolide antibiotics (10 days of clarithromycin, 5 days of azithromycin) for eradicating group A streptococci from the throats of individuals aged > or = 12 years with symptomatic pharyngitis and a positive throat culture. Patients received either clarithromycin (250 mg b.i.d. for 10 days [n=260]) or azythromycin (500 mg on day 1, followed by 250 mg q.d. for 4 days [n=265]). Follow-up throat cultures were obtained both at 13--19 days and at 28--38 days. We evaluated 392 patients (median age, 26 years; clarithromycin, 194 patients; azyithromycin, 198 patients). Ten days of clarithromycin therapy was more effective than 5 days of azithromycin therapy in eradicating the organism (91% [176/194] vs. 82% [162/198]; P=.012). More than 97% of all streptococcal isolates were macrolide-sensitive. Whether these bacteriologic eradication rates were the result of the 2 macrolides compared or were due to differences in duration of therapy could not be determined, but the statistically significant difference in eradication of group A streptococci does raise additional questions about shortened courses of macrolide therapy for this common infection.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Failure of treatment for chronic Mycobacterium abscessus meningitis despite adequate clarithromycin levels in cerebrospinal fluid.

We report a case of posttraumatic meningitis due to Mycobacterium abscessus, treated initially with oral clarithromycin and intravenous amikacin plus intrathecal amikacin. Despite cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of clarithromycin and amikacin in excess of their in vitro minimum inhibitory concentrations for the organism, the CSF cultures remained continuously positive for M. abscessus. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of M. abscessus meningitis and the first report of measured CSF levels of clarithromycin in a patient with meningitis, showing that even therapeutic CSF levels of clarithromycin and amikacin might not be successful in eradicating M. abscessus meningitis.

Amikacin↗
PubMed2005

Fatal interaction between clarithromycin and colchicine in patients with renal insufficiency: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin is frequently used to treat community-acquired pneumonia in elderly persons. Like erythromycin, it may interact with other drugs by interfering with metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes and with the P-glycoprotein transporter system. Colchicine, used for treatment of acute gout and for prophylaxis, may cause bone marrow toxicity. It is metabolized by CYP3A4 and is transported by P-glycoprotein. Initial case reports suggested potentially fatal interactions between clarithromycin and colchicine. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with 116 patients who were prescribed clarithromycin and colchicine during the same clinical admission. Case-control comparisons were made between patients who received concomitant therapy with the 2 drugs and patients who received sequential therapy. We assessed the clinical presentations and outcomes of the 2 patient groups and analyzed the risk factors associated with fatal outcomes. RESULTS: Nine (10.2%) of the 88 patients who received the 2 drugs concomitantly died. Only 1 (3.6%) of the 28 patients who received the drugs sequentially died. Multivariate analysis of the 88 patients who received concomitant therapy showed that longer overlapped therapy (relative risk [RR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-3.31; P< or =.01), the presence of baseline renal impairment (RR, 9.1; 95% CI, 1.75-47.06; P<.001), and the development of pancytopenia (RR, 23.4; 95% CI, 4.48-122.7; P<.001) were independently associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin increases the risk of fatal colchicine toxicity, especially for patients with renal insufficiency. Since there are other drugs for treatment of pneumonia and gout, these 2 drugs should not be coprescribed, because of the risk of fatality.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of rifabutin added to a regimen of clarithromycin and ethambutol for treatment of disseminated infection with Mycobacterium avium complex.

Current guidelines suggest that disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection be treated with a macrolide plus ethambutol or rifabutin or both. From 1993 to 1996, 198 AIDS patients with MAC bacteremia participated in a prospective, placebo-controlled trial of clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) plus ethambutol (1,200 mg/d), with or without rifabutin (300 mg/d). At 16 weeks, 63% of patients in the rifabutin group and 61% in the placebo group (P = .81) had responded bacteriologically. Changes in clinical symptoms and time to survival were similar in both groups. Development of clarithromycin resistance during therapy was similar in the two groups; of patients who had a bacteriologic response, however, only 1 of 44 (2%) receiving rifabutin developed clarithromycin resistance, vs. 6 of 42 (14%) in the placebo group (P = .055). Thus, rifabutin had no impact on bacteriologic response or survival but may protect against development of clarithromycin resistance in those who respond to therapy.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1998

Does in vitro susceptibility to rifabutin and ethambutol predict the response to treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia with rifabutin, ethambutol, and clarithromycin? Canadian HIV Trials Network Protocol 010 Study Group.

The in vitro susceptibilities of baseline Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) blood isolates from 86 patients with AIDS who were treated with clarithromycin, ethambutol, and rifabutin were determined to examine whether these results predict bacteriologic response to treatment. No patient received prior prophylaxis with clarithromycin or azithromycin. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of clarithromycin for all isolates were < or = 2 micrograms/mL. The median MIC of rifabutin was between 0.25 and 0.5 microgram/mL, and all isolates were susceptible to < or = 2 micrograms of rifabutin/mL. The median MIC of ethambutol was 4 micrograms/mL, and the MIC90 was 8 micrograms/mL. There was no correlation between ethambutol susceptibility and subsequent bacteriologic clearance. At all time points through week 12, bacteriologic clearance occurred more frequently in patients with isolates for which MICs of rifabutin were lower, but this difference was statistically significant only at week 2. Susceptibility testing for baseline MAC isolates from AIDS patients not previously treated with clarithromycin or azithromycin does not appear to be useful in guiding therapy.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2005

Posttranslational control of a cardiac ion channel transgene in vivo: clarithromycin-hMiRP1-Q9E interactions.

The present study investigates a novel gene therapy approach for atrial arrhythmias, using a clarithromycin-responsive ion channel subunit mutation, hMiRP1-Q9E, cloned into an expression plasmid; wild-type expression plasmids encoding human minK-related protein 1 (hMiRP1) were also used as controls. In a series of pig studies, right atrial myocardium was injected at one site with hMiRP1-Q9E plasmid DNA; a separate site in the same right atrium was injected with wild-type plasmid or was sham injected. Two weeks after transfection intravenous clarithromycin administration resulted in a site-specific, dose-dependent prolongation of the repolarization phase of the right atrial epicardial monophasic action potential (MAP) only at the hMiRPQ9E sites, but not at sham or wild-type sites. MAP recordings before clarithromycin administration did not differ between hMiRP1-Q9E and control sites. These studies show that regional control of atrial myocardial repolarization by site-specific transfection with plasmid DNA encoding an antibiotic-responsive ion channel subunit is feasible and, because hMiRP1-Q9E-transfected sites were affected only if clarithromycin was given, provide proof of concept for a posttranslational, controllable gene therapy strategy for atrial arrhythmias.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1995

Activities of clarithromycin, azithromycin, and ofloxacin in combination with liposomal or unencapsulated granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor against intramacrophage Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare.

The effects of ofloxacin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) against Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare (MAI) were evaluated in an in vitro human macrophage infection model. Treatment of MAI-infected macrophages with GM-CSF alone induced a maximal killing effect at 1000 U/mL, and the potency was increased 100-fold by encapsulating the cytokine within liposomes. Antibiotics were applied at concentrations close to their clinically achievable serum trough and peak levels. Addition of GM-CSF to azithromycin and therapeutic trough concentrations of ofloxacin and clarithromycin was associated with significant (P < .01) augmentation of antimycobacterial activity compared with the effects of the agents alone. However, the enhancement effect by GM-CSF was not seen with therapeutic peak concentrations of ofloxacin and clarithromycin. Thus, GM-CSF may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of MAI infections with azithromycin, clarithromycin, and ofloxacin.

Azithromycin↗
PubMed1991

Efficacy of clarithromycin against Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

The in-vitro susceptibility of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to clarithromycin, a new macrolide, was compared with that to erythromycin. A broth microdilution assay was used to evaluate 30 clinical isolates collected over a 15 year period from four countries (United States, Australia, Denmark and Japan). Clarithromycin inhibited the growth of all M. pneumoniae strains at low concentrations (less than or equal to 0.008 mg/l) similarly to erythromycin (less than or equal to 0.008 mg/l). In 120 outpatients with radiographically confirmed community acquired pneumonia (mean age 46.2 years), M. pneumoniae was detected culturally and/or serologically by ELISA and immunoblotting in 13% of patients, thus confirming the continued importance of this organism as a respiratory pathogen. M. pneumoniae isolates from these patients were shown to be equally susceptible to clarithromycin (less than or equal to 0.008 mg/l) and erythromycin (less than or equal to 0.008 mg/l). Both clarithromycin and erythromycin were effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. There were no statistically significant or clinically important differences between the two treatment groups with respect to clinical or radiographic resolution of disease or improvement in signs and symptoms. While the number of clinically evaluable patients with M. pneumoniae infections was small, both macrolides seemed equally effective.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Activity of rifabutin, clarithromycin, ethambutol, sparfloxacin and amikacin, alone and in combination, against Mycobacterium avium complex in human macrophages.

Disseminated infection with Microbacterium avium complex (MAC) in patients with AIDS is currently treated with a combination of antimycobacterial agents in order to prevent the selection of resistant mutant strains. Although clinical and microbiological responses can generally be achieved within a few weeks, relapses are common and require modification of the combination regimen or identification of effective alternate therapies. In this study we investigated the activities of rifabutin 0.5 mg/L, sparfloxacin 1 mg/L, clarithromycin 4 mg/L, amikacin 16 mg/L and ethambutol 2 mg/L, alone and in combination, against nine strains of M. avium isolated from the blood of patients with AIDS in order to identify regimens with the greatest therapeutic potential. Macrophages derived from human monocytes were infected with M. avium and inoculated with a single drug or a combination of drugs; cfu counts were performed at 0, 4 and 7 days after infection. At day 4 and at day 7, the combination of rifabutin, clarithromycin, amikacin and sparfloxacin displayed the highest degree of activity. However, the activity did not differ significantly from that of the combination of rifabutin, clarithromycin and ethambutol. The results of this study confirm the activity of combinations including rifabutin and clarithromycin (+/- ethambutol) in human monocyte-derived macrophages and suggest potentially useful associations in incorporating sparfloxacin and amikacin.

Amikacin↗
PubMed1997

Multicentre in-vitro evaluation of the susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis to ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, co-amoxiclav and sparfloxacin.

Seven laboratories, including a reference laboratory, tested the susceptibility of Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae strains to ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, co-amoxiclav and sparfloxacin with the Etest. A total of 976 strains were collected. The results with ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin were consistent for all laboratories, while those with clarithromycin and co-amoxiclav were not. The agreement between Etest MICs and broth microdilution was: ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin, >95%; clarithromycin for all species, 71-85%; co-amoxiclav for H. influenzae, 31%. MIC90 values (broth dilution, mg/L) for M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were: sparfloxacin, 0.06, 0.5, 0.03; ciprofloxacin, 0.12, 2.0, 0.03; co-amoxiclav, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25; clarithromycin 0.25, 0.25 and 16.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

In an open, randomized, parallel group study, the efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin 300 mg po od was compared with clarithromycin 500 mg po bd in the treatment of 60 patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). The two groups were well-matched demographically. Fifty patients (25 per group) were clinically evaluable at the end of the study and a satisfactory response was found in 88% of those given roxithromycin and 80% of those given clarithromycin. All had received treatment for a minimum of 3 days. Only one (3.3%) of 30 patients in the roxithromycin group reported adverse events compared with seven (23.3%) of 30 in the clarithromycin group. Thus both roxithromycin and clarithromycin are effective in the treatment of LRTI but roxithromycin is better tolerated (P < 0.05) with the advantage of a once-daily dose.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Concurrent clarithromycin and cyclosporin A treatment.

Although macrolides have been associated with significant pharmacokinetic interactions, clarithromycin is considered to have a low interaction capacity. In this study, six transplant recipients treated with cyclosporin A also received clarithromycin. In all patients, the dose of cyclosporin A had to be reduced by a mean of 33% per day depending on the macrolide dose. Normalization of the dosage parameters began on the fourth day after stopping clarithromycin treatment. Co-administration of cyclosporin A and clarithromycin may lead to increases in whole blood cyclosporin levels, and appropriate dose reductions should be considered.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2002

A prospective study of the clarithromycin-digoxin interaction in elderly patients.

The study was a prospective observational trial carried out to assess the clarithromycin-digoxin interaction in elderly patients chronically taking digoxin. Digoxin concentrations were determined before and after concomitant treatment with clarithromycin. A Bayesian approach was used to calculate digoxin pharmacokinetics. In the seven patients who were studied there was a significant increase in digoxin concentration after 4-7 days of clarithromycin treatment; digoxin clearance and elimination rate constant were 56-60% lower and elimination half-life was 82% longer. The pharmacokinetic clarithromycin-digoxin interaction in the elderly may be much more frequent than has been assumed up to now.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Activity of clarithromycin alone and in combination in a murine model of Mycobacterium kansasii infection.

Activities of clarithromycin alone and in combination with rifampicin, gatifloxacin or linezolid were evaluated against Mycobacterium kansasii in a murine infection model. Clarithromycin was the most active single agent. Rifampicin and gatifloxacin had similar activities, but were less active than clarithromycin. Clarithromycin in combination with rifampicin was the most active combination therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Clarithromycin is an effective immunomodulator in experimental pyelonephritis caused by pan-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: To apply clarithromycin as an immunomodulatory treatment in experimental infection caused by pan-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. METHODS: Acute pyelonephritis was induced in 80 rabbits after inoculation of the test isolate in the renal pelvis. Rabbits were divided into eight groups, with 10 animals in each group. In groups A-D, therapy was administered simultaneously with bacterial challenge as follows: A, controls; B, intravenous clarithromycin; C, amikacin; and D, both agents. In groups E-H, therapy was administered 24 h after bacterial challenge as follows: E, controls; F, intravenous clarithromycin; G, amikacin; and H, both agents. Blood was sampled for estimation of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and malondialdehyde (MDA); monocytes were isolated for determination of intracellular activity of caspase-3 and ex vivo TNF-alpha secretion. Four days after bacterial challenge, animals were sacrificed for quantitative cultures and biopsies of organs. RESULTS: Serum TNF-alpha at 48 h was lower in groups B, C and D compared with group A. Activity of caspase-3 of monocytes was lower at 48 h in group D compared with group A. Bacterial loads of liver and spleen were decreased in group D compared with those of group A. The numbers of inflammatory cells of spleen of group B were lower compared with those of group A; those of kidney and mesenteric lymph nodes of group D were lower than those of group A. Serum MDA of group H was lower than that of group E and serum TNF-alpha of group F was lower compared with that of group E. TNF-alpha of monocyte supernatants and activity of caspase-3 of monocytes of group F were lower than those of group E. Bacterial tissue loads did not differ among groups E, F, G and H. The numbers of inflammatory cells of liver of groups F and H were lower compared with those of group E; those of kidney of groups F, G and H were lower compared with those of group E. CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin administered intravenously in experimental infection caused by pan-resistant K. pneumoniae attenuated systemic inflammatory response and local tissue damage. This effect is probably attributed to immunomodulatory intervention on blood monocytes.

Acute Disease↗