Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PANCREAS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Apoptosis in kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Apoptosis is a particular form of cell death involved in the elimination of somatic cells. In this study, the occurrence of apoptotic cells in kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies was analyzed and correlated with the number of infiltrating macrophages and lymphocytes and granzyme B expression. METHODS: Kidney and pancreas biopsies from patients submitted to simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation were classified into three groups: acute rejection, chronic rejection, and transplant cases without evidence of rejection. Formalin-fixed paraffin biopsies were used to identify apoptosis by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase [TdT]-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) method. RESULTS: In normal kidney, only few apoptotic cells were observed. In contrast, in kidney-allograft biopsies, the TUNEL signal was detected in the nuclei of tubular epithelial cells and also in mononuclear cells scattered in the interstitium. In pancreas biopsies, numerous apoptotic cells were detected in acinar cells, in ducts, and occasionally in islets. The number of apoptotic cells in acute pancreas rejection was significantly higher compared with acute rejection of kidney grafts (50+/-14 vs. 21+/-4 cells/mm2; P<0.05). In kidney biopsies, there was a positive correlation between apoptosis and macrophages (r=0.51; P<0.005), and apoptosis versus T lymphocytes (r=0.45; P<0.05). In pancreas biopsies, the number of apoptotic cells correlated only with the number of macrophages (r=0.41; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apoptosis occurs in kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies, markedly in acute rejection in pancreas biopsies. Although apoptosis may reflect a mechanism of down-regulation of the allograft immune response by eliminating infiltrating cells, the elimination of graft cells may result in graft damage, particularly in pancreas transplantation.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed1996

The non-human primate endocrine pancreas: development, regeneration potential and metaplasia.

An investigation into the development of the Vervet monkey endocrine pancreas revealed a sequence of occurrence of pancreatic peptides that differed from previous reports in mice, dog and human with PP and somatostatin occurring before glucagon and insulin. All four pancreatic peptides were identified, immunohistochemically, in only one of the pancreatic primordial buds, before fusion of the two buds to form the pancreas. This questions the hypothesis that the heterogeneous endocrine cell distribution seen in the adult pancreas is due to the contribution of only PP cells by the ventral bud and non-PP cells by the dorsal bud. Co-localization of glucagon and PP was observed extensively in the developing pancreas and the predominant expression of one over the other in an apparently organized non-random manner accounted for the glucagon- and PP-rich areas seen in the developing pancreas. A small number of cells immunoreactive to glucagon and PP were also observed in the adult. Reports of plasticity of differentiation of other pancreatic cells led us to investigate regeneration potential of the adult monkey pancreas. Partial obstruction of the Vervet monkey main pancreatic duct, by cellophane wrapping, resulted in duct cell proliferation and differentiation to form new endocrine tissue in a way that mimics normal organogenesis. Focal areas of hepatocytes were found in the regenerated pancreas of one monkey, illustrating further the latent developmental capabilities of adult pancreas cells. These findings could lead to interesting new therapies for pancreas and liver disease.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Neurofunctional imaging of the pancreas utilizing the cholinergic PET radioligand [18F]4-fluorobenzyltrozamicol.

The pancreas is one of the most heavily innervated peripheral organs in the body. Parasympathetic and sympathetic neurons terminate in the pancreas and provide tight control of endocrine and exocrine functions. The aim of this study was to determine whether the pancreas can be imaged with a radioligand that binds to specific neuroreceptors. Using fluorine-18 4-fluorobenzyltrozamicol (FBT), which binds to the presynaptic vesicular acetylcholine transporter, positron emission tomography scans were performed in four adult mice, two adult rhesus monkeys, and one adult human. In these mammals, the pancreas is intensely FBT avid, with uptake greater than in any other organ at 30, 60, and 90 min. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) ratios of pancreas to liver, for example, ranged from 1.4 to 1.7 in rhesus monkeys (mean 1.6; median 1.7) and from 1.9 to 4.7 (mean 3.24; median 3.02) in mice. The maximum SUV ratio of pancreas to liver in the human was 1.8. These data suggest that neuroreceptor imaging of the pancreas in vivo is feasible in animal models and humans. This imaging could allow researchers to interrogate functions under control of the autonomic nervous system in the pancreas, with applications possible in transplanted and native pancreata. Also, as beta cell function is intimately related to parasympathetic cholinergic input, FBT activity in the pancreas may correlate with insulin-producing beta cell mass. This could ultimately provide a method of in vivo imaging in animal models and humans for diabetes research.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Pancreas after kidney transplants.

BACKGROUND: For certain uremic diabetic patients, a sequential transplant of a kidney (usually from a living donor) followed by a cadaver pancreas has become an attractive alternative to a simultaneous transplant of both organs. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes with simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) versus pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants to determine advantages and disadvantages of the two procedures. METHODS: Between January 1, 1994, and June 30, 2000, we performed 398 cadaver pancreas transplants at our center. Of these, 193 were SPK transplants and 205 were PAK transplants. We compared these two groups with regard to several endpoints, including patient and graft survival rates, surgical complications, acute rejection rates, waiting times, length of hospital stay, and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, surgical complications were more common for SPK recipients. The total relaparotomy rate was 25.9% for SPK recipients versus 15.1% for PAK recipients (P = 0.006). Leaks, intraabdominal infections, and wound infections were all significantly more common in SPK recipients (P = 0.009, P = 0.05, and P = 0.01, respectively, versus PAK recipients). Short-term pancreas graft survival rates were similar between the two groups: at 1 year posttransplant, 78.0% for SPK recipients and 77.9% for PAK recipients (P = not significant). By 3 years, however, pancreas graft survival differed between the two groups (74.1% for SPK and 61.7% for PAK recipients), although this did not quite reach statistical significance (P = 0.15). This difference in graft survival seemed to be due to increased immunologic losses for PAK recipients: at 3 years posttransplant, the incidence of immunologic graft loss was 16.2% for PAK versus 5.2% for SPK recipients (P = 0.01). Kidney graft survival rates were, however, better for PAK recipients. At 3 years after their kidney transplant, kidney graft survival rates were 83.6% for SPK and 94.6% for PAK recipients (P = 0.001). The mean waiting time to receive the pancreas transplant was 244 days for SPK and 167 days for PAK recipients (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PAK transplants are a viable option for uremic diabetics. While long-term pancreas graft results are slightly inferior to SPK transplants, the advantages of PAK transplants include the possibility of a preemptive living donor kidney transplant, better long-term kidney graft survival, significantly decreased waiting times, and decreased surgical complication rates. Use of a living donor for the kidney transplant expands the donor pool. Improvements in immunosuppressive regimens will hopefully eliminate some of the difference in long-term pancreas graft survival between SPK and PAK transplants.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Comparative distribution of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in pancreas of the dog and rat: immunocytochemistry of neuronal type NOS and histochemistry of NADPH-diaphorase.

We investigated the localization of nitric oxide synthase in the pancreas of the dog in comparison to the rat by the methods of immunocytochemistry using antineuronal type nitric oxide synthase serum and histochemistry using NADPH-diaphorase activity. In both species, the most intense staining was observed in neuronal cell bodies and fibers in the pancreas and nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivity was completely colocalized with NADPH-diaphorase activity. However, there were differences of the distribution between the two species. In the dog pancreas, immuno- and NADPH-diaphorase-positive nerve fibers were numerous around pancreatic ducts and moderate around the arteries and the acini but few in the islets. In contrast, in the rat pancreas, immuno- and diaphorase-positive fibers were fewer around the pancreatic ducts and acini and more abundant in the islets. The expression ratio of NADPH-diaphorase in intrapancreatic ganglion cell bodies that were scattered in the interlobular connective tissue was low to moderate (28.1% in the right lobe, 49.5% in the left lobe) in the dog, while the ratio in rat pancreas was very high in both lobes of the pancreas (about 86%). Except for neuronal staining, weak NADPH-diaphorase-positive reactions were detected in the vascular endothelial cells of the pancreas in both species. In rat islet cells, weak neuronal type nitric oxide synthase immunoreactivity was observed; however, in dog islet cells, no immunoreactivity was detected. These results suggest that nitric oxide in the pancreas is derived from vascular endothelium and neuronal tissue in both species and that the neuronal nitrergic regulation of the exocrine and endocrine pancreas is different between the species.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects on endogenous acetaldehyde production by disulfiram and ethanol feeding on rat pancreas.

Exogenous acetaldehyde infusion can induce pancreatitis-like injury of the pancreas in some isolated pancreas models, whereas in vivo such treatment has failed to induce pancreatitis. In vivo exogenous acetaldehyde may not be effective because it is rapidly metabolized. The aim of this study was to investigate whether endogenous acetaldehyde accumulates in the pancreas after ethanol feeding when acetaldehyde metabolism is blocked by disulfiram, and whether this treatment can induce pancreatitis-like injury in the rat. The liver was studied for comparison. In part I of the experiment, adult male Wistar rats were given water (n = 24), ethanol (n = 24), disulfiram (n = 24), and ethanol plus disulfiram for 1 week (n = 24) or 3 weeks (n = 24) and for 3 weeks with (n = 6) and without (n = 6) hypovolemia. In part II of the experiment, rats were given water (n = 6), ethanol (n = 6), and high-dose disulfiram (n = 6) and ethanol plus high-dose disulfiram (n = 6). Ethanol and acetaldehyde concentrations in blood, liver, and pancreas were measured. Animal behavior was monitored, and weight changes, plasma amylase activity, water content, and histomorphology of the pancreas and liver were studied without knowing the group. No increases in plasma amylase activity and no histomorphologic changes in the pancreas were observed under light or electron microscopy in part I of the experiment. In part II, treatment with ethanol induced acetaldehyde accumulation in the liver (33.6 +/- 2.6 micromol/L), but to a lesser degree in the blood (9.6 +/- micromol/L) and pancreas (5.0 +/-.2 micromol/L). Ethanol plus disulfiram induced marked accumulation of acetaldehyde in the liver (83.2 +/- 15.9 micromol/L), blood (280.0 +/- 47.4 micromol/L), and pancreas (43.6 +/- 4.7 micromol/L). When tissue acetaldehyde levels reached 30 to 40 micromol/L, we found a decrease in zymogen granules along with formation of small intracytoplasmic vacuolizations in the acinar cells and accumulation of lipid droplets in the hepatocytes, whereas physiologic signs of pancreatitis (hyperamylasemia, edema) or increases in liver enzymes did not develop. High levels of acetaldehyde accumulate in the liver and pancreas with the treatment described. Although this was accompanied by lipid degeneration of the hepatocytes and some subcellular changes in the acinar cells, physiologic signs of pancreatitis did not develop. Thus acetaldehyde accumulation alone, or in combination with hypovolemia, is not responsible for the induction of acute pancreatitis.

Acetaldehyde↗
PubMed1999

Clostridium difficile colitis after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the timing and risk factors involved in the development of Clostridium difficile (CD) colitis in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence of CD colitis after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation has not been studied in detail. The question of whether the immunosuppressed transplant recipient is more prone to CD colitis and its complications (i.e., megacolon, perforations) and the risk factors involved have not been determined. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience in kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients who received transplants between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1994. We divided these recipients into three groups: pediatric kidney recipients, adult kidney recipients, and kidney-pancreas recipients. For each group, we assessed the timing of infection, primary disease, colitis treatment, and any concurrent complications or risk factors. RESULTS: Of 1932 transplants, 159 recipients developed post-transplant CD colitis. 132 charts were available for review. Forty-three pediatric kidney recipients developed CD colitis. Their mean age was 3.2 yr; 74% (n = 37) of them developed their colitis during their initial hospital stay, with the mean timing of infection being 33 d. Forty-one (95%) had undergone intra-abdominal placement of the graft, with renal artery anastomoses to the aorta. Fifty adult kidney recipients developed CD colitis. Thirteen (26%) developed colitis during their initial hospital stay, with the mean timing of infection (for all adult kidney recipients) being 15 months. Thirty-nine kidney-pancreas recipients developed CD colitis. Mean timing of infection was 6 months. The overall incidence of CD colitis was 8%, with 16% in the pediatric kidney group, 15.5% in the kidney-pancreas group, and 3.5% in the adult kidney group. The difference in mean timing of infection was significant between the three groups (p < 0.001 for pediatric versus adult kidney recipients, p = 0.002 for pediatric kidney versus kidney-pancreas recipients, and p = 0.2846 for adult kidney versus kidney-pancreas recipients). CONCLUSION: The incidence of CD colitis is increased in pediatric kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients. Young recipient age ( < 5 yr), female gender, treatment of rejection with monoclonal antibodies, antibiotic use, and intra-abdominal graft placement have been shown to increase the incidence of this disease. Further studies concerning prevention in the high-risk groups are needed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies of steroid withdrawal have been carried out in kidney and liver transplant recipients, but only a few in pancreas transplant recipients. Yet, pancreas transplant recipients could have significant long-term benefits from steroid withdrawal. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis to determine the feasibility of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients. RESULTS: Of 360 recipients who underwent a pancreas transplant between January 1, 1994 and June 30, 1998, 14 attempted steroid withdrawal (12 simultaneous pancreas-kidney [SPK]; 2 pancreas transplant alone [PTA]). Reasons for steroid withdrawal were bone fractures (n = 3), psychiatric disorders (n = 2), severe acne (n = 1), recurrent infections (n = 4), and problems with hypercholesterolemia or hypertension (n = 4). All 14 were maintained on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppression, except for 1 who was on tacrolimus and azathioprine (AZA). Of the 14 recipients, 11 had no episodes of acute rejection before steroid withdrawal. The remaining 3 had one or more acute rejection episodes. Of the 14 recipients, 10 (72%) currently remain off steroids (mean follow-up 18 months, range 5-51 months). However, 4 recipients have resumed steroids: 2 after an acute rejection episode (at 2 and 21 months post-withdrawal) and 2 because of leukopenia (WBC < 3000) and an inability to tolerate full-dose MMF. Steroid withdrawal was unsuccessful in both PTA recipients and in 2 of the 12 SPK recipients. All 14 recipients currently have a functioning pancreas graft. However, 1 of the SPK recipients, in whom steroid withdrawal failed, has developed chronic kidney rejection and is now back on hemodialysis awaiting a retransplant. CONCLUSION: Steroid withdrawal is possible in up to 70% of pancreas transplant recipients. Further studies are necessary to define ideal candidates for steroid withdrawal. Based on the results of this analysis, we have launched a prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in pancreas transplant recipients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Impact of hepatitis C virus status in pancreas transplantation: a case controlled study.

Available data suggest that hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+) renal transplant patients may be at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality compared with HCV- patients. Limited data are available regarding the impact of HCV status in pancreas transplant patients. We compared the outcomes of 10 HCV+ patients undergoing pancreas transplantation (seven simultaneous kidney-pancreas, one pancreas after kidney, two pancreas alone) between 1/96 and 10/99 with 20 HCV- recipients that were matched for age, race, gender, timing of transplant, type of pancreas transplant, and surgical technique. Length of follow-up was not significantly different between the HCV+ group compared with the HCV- group (24 +/- 14 vs. 20 +/- 13 months; p=0.45). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of all cause mortality in HCV+ recipients compared with HCV- recipients, 30 vs. 10%, respectively (p=0.17). Additionally, the HCV+ recipients had a trend toward a higher incidence of sepsis-related mortality compared with HCV- recipients, 20 vs. 5%, respectively (p=0.19). Renal allograft survival was 50% in the HCV+ group compared with 94% in the HCV- group (p=0.02). Pancreas allograft survival was not significantly different between the groups, 60 vs. 80%, respectively (p=0.24). At 3, 6, 12 months, and end of follow-up, there were no differences in serum creatinine, amylase, C-peptide, or fasting glucose levels. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of proteinuria at last follow-up in the HCV+ recipients with a renal allograft when compared with HCV- recipients, 50 vs. 12.5%, respectively (p=0.05). In order to maintain comparable glycemic control between the groups, there was a significant increase in oral hypoglycemic requirement in HCV+ recipients compared with HCV- recipients, 33 vs. 0%, respectively (p=0.01). These data suggest that HCV+ pancreas transplant patients may be at an increased risk of graft dysfunction and morbidity. Further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to fully define the impact of HCV status on pancreas graft survival and function.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2003

Pancreas transplantation in crossmatch-positive recipients.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged cold preservation time can unfavorably affect outcome in pancreas transplantation. To reduce this ischemic time, cadaver pancreas grafts, in selected cases, are sometimes transplanted before crossmatch results are known. We report our experience with pancreas transplants in recipients with either current or historically positive T- or B-cell crossmatches. METHODS: Crossmatch-positive pancreas transplants were identified using a computerized database. T-cell crossmatches were performed using an antihuman-globulin-augmented complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test; B-cell crossmatches were performed using an extended incubation CDC test. All patients received anti-T-cell induction therapy and either cyclosporine (1987-1993) or tacrolimus-based (1994-2001) immunosuppression. More recent recipients (2000-2001) also received intravenous gamma globulin and postoperative plasmapheresis. RESULTS: Between October 1, 1987 and March 31, 2001, of a total of 1076 pancreas transplants performed, 59 (5.48%) were crossmatch-positive. Of these, 8 had a current T-cell-positive crossmatch and 15 had a current B-cell-positive crossmatch. One recipient was both current B- and T-positive, and the rest were past B- and/or T-cell positive. One-year pancreas graft survival for current T- and B-cell crossmatch-positive transplants was 63% and 67%, respectively. T- or B-cell crossmatch-negative transplants had a 1-yr survival of 70%. In the T-cell crossmatch-positive group, four grafts are still functioning (follow-up range, 2-12 yr), one patient died with a functioning graft at 4 months, and four grafts failed (one each from pancreatitis, infection, primary nonfunction, and vascular thrombosis). No grafts were lost to rejection. In the B-cell crossmatch-positive group, six grafts are still functioning (follow-up range, 2-11 yr) and nine have failed (four from chronic rejection, three from vascular thromboses, and two from pancreatitis). Crossmatch-positive cases were significantly more likely to be retransplants (70.8%) than crossmatch-negative cases (14.8%, p < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, crossmatch positivity did not affect pancreas graft outcome, whereas retransplants had a significant impact on outcome (relative risk 1.84, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: (: i) Pancreas transplants performed in the setting of a positive current crossmatch may have long-term function. (ii) With current immunosuppressive protocols, graft loss from hyperacute and acute rejection may be prevented in current crossmatch-positive pancreas transplants. Chronic rejection was only seen in B-cell crossmatch-positive cases. (iii) High rates of technical graft loss in crossmatch-positive cases may reflect a high frequency of retransplants in this group.

B-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed2003

Impact of acute rejection episodes on long-term graft survival following simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Although it is well established that acute rejection is one of the major risk factors for chronic graft loss following kidney transplantation, its effect on long-term graft survival following simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants (SKPTs) is less well known. We analyzed a large cohort of SKPTs and cadaver kidney transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing database during 1988-97, to determine the impact of acute rejection episodes on long-term kidney and pancreas graft survival. Only patients whose kidney and pancreas grafts had survived for at least 1 year were included. Other potential risk factors influencing long-term graft survival were included in the analysis. Of the 4251 SKPTs, 45% had no acute rejection, 36% had kidney only rejection, 3% had pancreas only rejection, and 16% had both kidney and pancreas rejection within the 1st year post transplant. The 5-year kidney and pancreas graft survival rates adjusted for other risk factors were 91% and 85%, respectively; for those with no acute rejection episodes, 88% and 84%, respectively; for those with kidney only rejection, 94% and 83%, respectively; for those with pancreas only rejection; and 86% and 78%, respectively, for those with both kidney and pancreas rejection. The relative risk (RR) of kidney graft failure was 1.32 when acute rejection involved the kidney graft only, while the RR was 1.53 when the rejection involved both organs. We conclude that acute rejection episodes have a negative impact on the long-term kidney graft survival in the SKPT population similar to that in the cadaver kidney transplant population. Patients who had acute rejection episodes of both kidney and pancreas have the worst long-term graft survival.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed1999

Effect of subcutaneous pancreatic tissue transplants on streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. III. Distribution of neuropeptides in normal and diabetic (host) pancreas.

This study examines whether there is a change in the pattern of distribution of cholecystokinin-octapeptide (CCK-8), calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP), neuropeptide-Y (NPY), substance P (SP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the pancreas of streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic (host) rats after subcutaneous pancreatic transplantation. Varicose CCK-8-immunopositive nerve fibres were observed in the wall of blood vessels of both normal and diabetic host pancreata. The density of CCK-8-immunoreactive varicose nerve fibres appeared to have increased in host rat pancreas. CGRP was demonstrated in many nerve fibres located in the wall of blood vessels of both normal and host pancreas. CGRP, however, seemed to be better expressed in the nerves of host pancreas when compared to normal. The pancreata of both normal and diabetic (host) rats contained numerous NPY-immunopositive varicose nerve fibres located in the wall of blood vessels. SP was demonstrated in neurons located in the interlobular areas of normal tissue and in fine varicose nerve fibres of the interacinar region of the pancreas of STZ-induced diabetic rats with SPTG. In normal pancreatic tissue, VIP-immunopositive nerve fibres were observed in all areas of the pancreas. VIP-positive nerve fibres were still discernible especially in the interacinar regions of the pancreas of host rats. In conclusion, the pattern of distribution and density of NPY, SP and VIP in the pancreas of STZ-induced diabetic rats with SPTG is similar to that observed in normal pancreas, but the expression of CGRP and CCK-8 seemed to have increased as a result of transplantation and or diabetes.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Effect of electrical field stimulation on insulin and glucagon secretion from the pancreas of normal and diabetic rats.

The effect of electrical field stimulation (EFS) on insulin (INS) and glucagon (GLU) secretion from normal and diabetic rat pancreas is poorly understood. In our study, EFS (5-20Hz, 50 V amplitude and 1.0 ms pulse width), when applied alone, resulted in a significant (p<0.05) increase in INS secretion from the pancreas of both normal and diabetic rats. Atropine (10(-5) M) did not inhibit the EFS (5 Hz)-evoked INS secretion in normal pancreas and failed to alter the effect of EFS (10-20 Hz) on INS secretion from the pancreas of both normal and diabetic rats. Propranolol (Prop) inhibited INS secretion to below basal level in the presence of EFS (5 Hz) but not at EFS (10- 20 Hz). Tetrodotoxin (TTX) also significantly (p = 0.002) inhibited INS secretion from normal pancreas in the presence of EFS (5-20 Hz). The decrease in insulin secretion observed when pancreatic tissue fragments were incubated in Prop and TTX in the presence of EFS was reversed by yohimbine (10(-5) M). In contrast, TTX did not significantly modify INS secretion from diabetic pancreas in the presence of EFS. EFS (5-20 Hz) significantly (p<0.05) increased GLU release from normal and diabetic rat pancreas when applied alone. Neither atropine, Prop nor TTX significantly modified GLU release from the pancreas of either normal or diabetic rats. This suggests that GLU secretion may be controlled through a different pathway. The EFS-evoked INS and GLU secretion is probably executed via different mechanisms. These mechanisms include 1) activation of cholinergic nerves by EFS; 2) EFS of alpha- and beta-adrenergic nerves; 3) activation of non-adrenergic non-cholinergic pathway by EFS; 4) EFS-induced depolarization and subsequent action potential in pancreatic endocrine cells and 5) electroporosity caused by EFS-induced membrane permeability. All of these effects may be summative. In conclusion, EFS (5-20 Hz), when applied alone, can evoke significant increases in INS and GLU secretion from the pancreas of both normal and diabetic rats. Insulin secretion is controlled via alpha-2 adrenergic (inhibition) and beta-adrenergic (stimulation) receptors. Glucagon secretion is enhanced by alpha2 adrenergic stimulation.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Simultaneous administration of adjuvant donor bone marrow in pancreas transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of donor bone marrow was evaluated for its potentially favorable effect in the authors' simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant program. METHODS: From July 1994 to January 1999, 177 pancreas transplants were performed, 151 of which were simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants. All patients received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids for immunosuppression (azathioprine was used in the first year of the program). Fifty-three simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients received perioperative unmodified donor bone marrow, 3 to 6 x 10(8) cells/kg. RESULTS: Overall actuarial survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 98% and 95% (patient), 95% and 87% (kidney), and 86% and 80% (pancreas), respectively. In the adjuvant bone marrow group, 1- and 3-year survival rates were 96% and 91 % (patient), 95% and 87% (kidney), and 83% and 83% (pancreas), respectively. For 98 recipients who did not receive bone marrow, survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 100% and 98% (patient), 96% and 86% (kidney), and 87% and 79% (pancreas), respectively. No pancreas allografts were lost after 3 months in bone marrow recipients, and seven in the non-bone marrow recipients were lost to rejection at 0.7, 6.7, 8.8, 14.6, 24.1, 24.3, and 25.5 months. Twenty-two percent of bone marrow patients were steroid-free at 1 year, 45% at 2 years, and 67% at 3 years. Nineteen percent of the non-bone marrow recipients were steroid-free at 1 year, 38% at 2 years, and 45% (p = 0.02) at 3 years. The mean acute cellular rejection rate was 0.94+/-1.1 in the bone marrow group and 1.57+/-1.3 (p = 0.003) in the non-bone marrow group (includes borderline rejection and multiple rejections). The level of donor cell chimerism in the peripheral blood of bone marrow patients was at least two logs higher than in controls. CONCLUSION: In this series, which represents the largest experience with adjuvant bone marrow infusion in pancreas recipients, there was a higher steroid withdrawal rate (p = 0.02), fewer rejection episodes, and no pancreas graft loss after 3 months in bone marrow recipients compared with contemporaneous controls. All pancreas allografts lost to chronic rejection (n = 6) were in the non-bone marrow group. Donor bone marrow administered around the time of surgery may have a protective effect in pancreas transplantation.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Surgical management of recurrent pancreatitis in children with pancreas divisum.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze an institutional experience with pancreatitis in childhood to clarify the frequency of pancreas divisum in that patient population, the characteristics of pancreatitis in children with pancreas divisum, and the role of surgical management in their treatment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The role of pancreas divisum in causing acute and relapsing pancreatitis and chronic, recurring abdominal pain is controversial. Although the anatomical abnormality is present from birth, most investigators have reported cases with onset of symptoms in adulthood. The reported pediatric experience with this disorder is small, and the natural history of pancreatitis in children with pancreas divisum has not been well elucidated. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all children 18 years of age and younger with a discharge diagnosis of pancreatitis identified 135 patients treated in the authors' institution from 1978 to 1998. Ten patients were found to have anatomical variants of pancreas divisum associated with recurrent or chronic pancreatitis. The medical records of these patients were reviewed for data on the presentation, diagnostic findings, imaging studies, treatment, surgical findings, and pathologic findings in these children. Chart review and telephone calls were used to assess the current state of health in nine patients available for follow-up. RESULTS: Pancreas divisum was identified in 7.4% of all children with pancreatitis and 19.2% of children with relapsing or chronic pancreatitis. Patients had early onset of recurrent episodic epigastric pain and vomiting, at a mean age of 6 years. Three patients had a positive family history of pancreatitis and one was proven by DNA analysis to have hereditary pancreatitis. Pancreatitis was documented by elevated amylase or lipase levels, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was the method of diagnosis of pancreas divisum in all patients. Eight patients had complete pancreas divisum and two had incomplete variants. Eight patients underwent surgery to improve ductal drainage. Seven underwent transduodenal sphincteroplasty of the accessory papilla, along with sphincteroplasty of the major papilla in two (plus septoplasty in one). Three patients underwent longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy, as a primary procedure in one patient with midductal stenosis and in two because of recurring pancreatitis after sphincteroplasty. The surgical findings and histologic examination of five patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy revealed striking changes of advanced chronic pancreatitis. Patients responding to sphincteroplasty alone showed less severe histologic changes. Overall, three of seven patients had excellent results, three were improved, and one had continued disabling attacks of pancreatitis. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.3 years, and there were no deaths. No patients had endocrine or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and none required chronic analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas divisum is an important cause of recurrent pancreatitis in childhood and should be sought aggressively in children with more than one episode of pancreatitis or pancreatitis with a history of chronic recurrent abdominal pain. Surgical intervention is directed toward relief of ductal obstruction and may involve accessory duct sphincteroplasty alone or in combination with major sphincteroplasty and septoplasty. Patients with more distal ductal obstruction or ductal ectasia may benefit from pancreaticojejunostomy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Solitary pancreas transplantation for nonuremic patients with labile insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation has become a widely accepted treatment option for selected uremic patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Patient survival rates at 1 year exceed 90%, and rates of pancreas graft survival, 70%. However, solitary pancreas transplantation for nonuremic patients with IDDM has been controversial because of the less favorable outcome and the need for long-term immunosuppression with its associated morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We studied the outcome of 225 solitary pancreas transplants during three immunosuppressive eras: the precyclosporine (CsA) era (n=83), the CsA era (n=118), and the tacrolimus era (n=24). Only patients with labile IDDM (e.g., hypoglycemic unawareness, insulin reactions, > or = 2 failed attempts at intensified insulin therapy for metabolic control) underwent solitary pancreas transplantation. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we looked at patient and graft survival, the risk of surgical complications, and native kidney function during these three eras. RESULTS: Pancreas graft survival improved significantly over time: 34% at 1 year after transplantation in the pre-CsA era, 52% in the CsA era, and 80% in the tacrolimus era (P=0.002). Pancreas graft loss due to rejection decreased from 50% at 1 year in the pre-CsA era, to 34% in the CsA era, to 9% in the tacrolimus era (P=0.008). The rate of technical failures (i.e., the risk of surgical complications) decreased from 30% in the pre-CsA era, to 14% in the CsA era, to 0% in the tacrolimus era (P=0.001). Patient survival rates at 1 year have ranged between 88% and 95% in the three eras (P=NS). Matching for at least one antigen on each HLA locus and avoiding HLA-B mismatches significantly decreased the incidence of rejection. The incidence of native kidney failure due to drug-induced toxicity decreased significantly over time, in part because only recipients with pretransplant creatinine clearance > or = 80 ml/min received transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Solitary pancreas transplantation has become a viable alternative for nonuremic patients with labile IDDM. The risks of surgical complications and drug-induced nephrotoxicity have significantly decreased over time. Using tacrolimus as the mainstay immunosuppressant, patient and graft survival rates now no longer trail those of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Mycophenolate mofetil in pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to decrease the incidence of acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation. The use of MMF along with tacrolimus for > or =1 year after pancreas transplantation has not been studied in a large single-center analysis. METHODS: Between July 1, 1995 and June 30, 1997, both MMF and tacrolimus were given to 120 pancreas transplant recipients. By category, 61 underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK); 44 underwent pancreas transplantation after previous kidney transplantation (PAK); and 15 underwent pancreas transplantation alone (PTA). By donor source, 86% of the grafts were from a cadaver, and 14% were from a living-related donor. Induction therapy was with MMF, tacrolimus, prednisone, and antithymocyte globulin (n=109) or OKT3 (n=2). Until oral intake was resumed, recipients initially received intravenous azathioprine. Side effects were as follows: gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in 53% of recipients receiving combined MMF and tacrolimus therapy; bone marrow toxicity in 24% of recipients receiving MMF alone; nephrotoxicity in 18% and neurotoxicity in 11% of recipients receiving tacrolimus alone. We did a matched-pair analysis to compare outcome in MMF versus azathioprine recipients, using the database of the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Matching criteria included transplantation category, transplantation number, recipient and donor age, duct management, HLA typing, and transplantation year. RESULTS: One-year patient survival rates were 98% for SPK, 98% for PAK, and 100% for PTA (P=NS). For SPK recipients, 1-year pancreas graft survival rates were 86% with MMF versus 79% with azathioprine (P=NS); kidney graft survival rates were 96% with MMF versus 86% with azathioprine (P=NS). The incidence of first rejection episodes at 1 year was significantly lower for MMF recipients (15% with MMF versus 43% with azathioprine) (P = 0.0003). For recipients of solitary pancreas transplants (PTA and PAK), we found no difference in graft survival rates between MMF and azathioprine. The conversion rate from MMF to azathioprine at 1 year was 14% for SPK recipients, 26% for PAK, and 39% for PTA (P < 0.007). The most common reason for conversion was GI toxicity, in particular for nonuremic (PTA) or posturemic (PAK) recipients. The rates of posttransplant infection and lymphoproliferative disease were low for recipients on MMF and tacrolimus. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MMF and tacrolimus after pancreas transplantation is highly effective and safe. For SPK recipients, the incidence of acute reversible rejection episodes was significantly lower with MMF than with azathioprine. The conversion rate from MMF to azathioprine because of GI toxicity was lowest for SPK and highest for PTA recipients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation without antilymphocyte induction.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of potent new immunosuppressive agents may allow simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation to be performed without antilymphocyte induction. METHODS: We analyzed 30 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids without without antilymphocyte induction. Eighteen patients underwent pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric (P-E) drainage and the remaining 12 had systemic bladder (S-B) drainage. Target 12 hr trough tacrolimus levels for the first 3 months after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation were 15-20 ng/ml. The oral mycophenolate mofetil dose was 2-3 g/day begun immediately posttransplant in two to four divided doses. Steroids were tapered according to protocol. RESULTS: All patients experienced immediate function of both kidney and pancreas grafts. One-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates are 93, 93, and 90%, respectively. Nine patients (30%) had a total of 13 rejection episodes (12 biopsy proven) including 4 within 2 weeks, 6 between 2 weeks and 3 months, and 3 beyond 3 months after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Three rejection episodes were treated with steroids alone and 10 were treated with antilymphocyte therapy (5 OKT3 and 5 ATGAM). A total of seven patients (23%) received antilymphocyte therapy. Three patients (10%) had more than one rejection episode. Two pancreas grafts (7%) and one kidney graft (3%) were lost from rejection. Four patients (13%) developed cytomegalovirus infection, but none had tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus. At present, 22 surviving patients (81%) remain on triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone with excellent dual graft function. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone immunosuppression without without antilymphocyte induction is safe and effective after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Adult↗