PubMed2003
MOTIVATION: Sequence alignment methods that compare two sequences (pairwise methods) are important tools for the detection of biological sequence relationships. In genome annotation, multiple methods are often run and agreement between methods taken as confirmation. In this paper, we assess the advantages of combining search methods by comparing seven pairwise alignment methods, including three local dynamic programming algorithms (PRSS, SSEARCH and SCANPS), two global dynamic programming algorithms (GSRCH and AMPS) and two heuristic approximations (BLAST and FASTA), individually and by pairwise intersection and union of their result lists at equal p-value cut-offs. RESULTS: When applied singly, the dynamic programming methods SCANPS and SSEARCH gave significantly better coverage (p=0.01) compared to AMPS, GSRCH, PRSS, BLAST and FASTA. Results ranked by BLAST p-values gave significantly better coverage compared to ranking by BLAST e-values. Of 56 combinations of eight methods considered, 19 gave significant increases in coverage at low error compared to the parent methods at an equal p-value cutoff. The union of results by BLAST (p-value) and FASTA at an equal p-value cutoff gave significantly better coverage than either method individually. The best overall performance was obtained from the intersection of the results from SSEARCH and the GSRCH62 global alignment method. At an error level of five false positives, this combination found 444 true positives, a significant 12.4% increase over SSEARCH applied alone.