Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DBP”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources

Long-term cost and life-expectancy consequences of hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate hypertension's long-term cost and impact on life expectancy. DESIGN: A 19-year individual follow-up study. Subjects were categorized according to their baseline (1972) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) level into three groups: normotensive (DBP < 95 mmHg), mildly hypertensive (DBP 95-104 mmHg), and severely hypertensive (DBP > 104 mmHg). By using their social security identification numbers, we linked the subjects to a set of national registers covering hospital admissions, use of major drugs, absence due to sickness, disability pensions, and deaths. SUBJECTS: A random population sample of 10 284 men and women aged 25-59 years from the provinces of Kuopio and North Karelia in eastern Finland. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The numbers of years of life and years of work lost, the cost of drugs and hospitalization, and the value of productivity lost due to disability and premature mortality. RESULTS: The difference in life expectancy between normotensive and severely hypertensive men was 2.7 years, of which 2.0 years was due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Among women the corresponding differences were 2.0 and 1.5 years. Severely hypertensive men lost 2.6 years of work more than did normotensive men, of which 1.7 years was due to CVD. Among women the differences were 2.2 and 1.3 years. The mean undiscounted total costs (USA dollars at 1992 prices) were $132 500 among normotensive, $146 500 among mildly hypertensive, and $219 300 among severely hypertensive men, of which CVD accounted for 28, 39, and 43%, respectively. More than 90% of the total costs were indirect productivity losses. Among women the total costs were lower for all DBP categories, as were the shares of CVD-related costs. The proportional increase in costs on going from the lowest to the highest DBP category was, however, somewhat larger among women. CONCLUSIONS: On the population level, severe hypertension leads to considerable losses in terms of years of life lost, years of work lost, and costs. However, the overall impact of mild hypertension is much more limited.

Adult↗

Pilot study of combined blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in essential hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: Additive hemodynamic effects of combined blockade of the renin-angiotensin system by an angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II antagonist have been observed in sodium-depleted normotensive volunteers and in patients with congestive heart failure. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the same additive hemodynamic effects occur in patients with hypertension and to verify the safety of such an approach. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, pilot study. PATIENTS: 177 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension [diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 95-115 mmHg after a 4-week placebo run-in period] were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Combination therapy consisting of 50 mg losartan daily and 10 mg enalapril daily was administered for 6 weeks. The effects of this therapeutic regimen was compared with similar groups of patients who received either 50 mg losartan daily or 10 mg enalapril daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 24-hour ambulatory mean DBP and clinic DBP measured at trough after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: 24-hour ambulatory mean DBP did not significantly differ between treatment groups although the combination tended to lower BP more. The combination therapy was more effective on clinic DBP measured at trough than was losartan by 3.2 mmHg [confidence interval (95%, CI) 0.7-5.7 mmHg, P = 0.012], and more effective than enalapril by 4.0 mmHg (95% CI, 1.5-6.4 mmHg, P = 0.002). In a subgroup of 28 patients, higher plasma active renin and angiotensin I levels during blockade by the combination therapy were observed. This finding confirmed that the combination of the two agents inhibited the renin-angiotensin system to a greater extent than did either agent alone. CONCLUSION: A combination of 10 mg enalapril daily and 50 mg losartan daily safely induces a supplementary, although modest, fall in clinic DBP in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

Adolescent↗

A new approach to assessing antihypertensive therapy: effect of treatment on pulse pressure. Candesartan cilexetil in Hypertension Ambulatory Measurement of Blood Pressure (CHAMP) Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: A high pulse pressure is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. It has therefore been suggested that antihypertensive treatment should not only reduce systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), but should also decrease pulse pressure (SBP minus DBP). In a previous analysis, we showed that two angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)-receptor blockers, candesartan cilexetil and losartan, differed in their effects in reducing SBP and DBP. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of candesartan cilexetil and losartan according to a new approach--their effect on pulse pressure--and to describe the dose-effect relationship for SBP, DBP and pulse pressure, in a placebo-controlled study. METHODS: After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 268 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were allocated randomly to groups to receive placebo, candesartan cilexetil (8 mg once daily) or losartan (50 mg once daily), for 4 weeks. The doses were then doubled to 16 and 100 mg, respectively, for the final 4 weeks of the study. Clinic blood pressure was measured 24 and 48 h after each dose of drug or placebo, and ambulatory blood pressure was monitored from 0 to 36 h after each dose, at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Candesartan cilexetil decreased ambulatory pulse pressure significantly (P < 0.05) more than did losartan during both daytime and night-time, and over the 24 h period after the previous dose. A different dose-effect relationship on SBP, DBP and pulse pressure was observed. The duration of action of candesartan cilexetil was greater than that of losartan. After a missed dose (i.e. approximately 24-36 h after the previous dose), mean ambulatory pulse pressure values after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment with candesartan cilexetil were lower than those observed with losartan (P < 0.005). Clinic pulse pressure measurements were consistent with these ambulatory measurements. CONCLUSIONS: AT1 -receptor blockers differ both in their ability to reduce pulse pressure and in their duration of effect, candesartan cilexetil having a greater and more sustained effect than losartan. Different dose-effect relationships on SBP, DBP or pulse pressure were observed. Further prospective studies based on pulse pressure are needed to analyse the mechanism of reduction of pulse pressure and to determine its prognostic value.

Adult↗

Blood pressure response, but not adverse event incidence, correlates with dose of angiotensin II antagonist.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of the novel angiotensin II antagonist olmesartan medoxomil in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, using a meta-analysis of the combined database from seven US and European clinical trials. DESIGN: Studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and dose-finding (2.5-80 mg), with treatment duration of 6-52 weeks. SETTING: Hospital outpatient clinics. PATIENT POPULATION: A total of 3,095 patients in the safety population and 3,055 patients in the intent-to-treat (efficacy) population. METHODS: All studies used conventional sphygmomanometry for blood pressure measurements at trough (end of the dosing interval). Three studies also used 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the principal efficacy evaluations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of patients achieving diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < or = 90 mmHg or decrease > or = 10 mmHg (responder rate), percentage of patients achieving a target DBP < or = 90 mmHg or target systolic blood pressure (SBP) < or = 140 mmHg (normalization rate), and mean decrease in DBP from baseline to last visit. RESULTS: Efficacy variables tended to be dose related up to the 40 mg dose level. All olmesartan medoxomil doses were statistically significantly more effective than placebo for responder rate, DBP and SBP normalization rates, and mean decrease in DBP. A clinically relevant decrease of > or = 5 mmHg from baseline in sitting DBP was also observed at doses of 20 mg and above after correction for placebo effect The safety profile of olmesartan medoxomil was similar to that of placebo and was not dose related. CONCLUSIONS: Olmesartan medoxomil was safe and highly effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension in these studies.

Angiotensin II↗

Inhibition of facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission and angiotensin II-induced pressor effects in the pithed rat: comparison between valsartan, candesartan, eprosartan and embusartan.

BACKGROUND: In the pithed rat model, endogenously generated angiotensin (Ang) II can enhance sympathetic neurotransmission by acting on Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptors that are located on sympathetic nerve terminals. OBJECTIVE: To compare the inhibitory potency of candesartan, valsartan, eprosartan and embusartan in blocking presynaptically and postsynaptically located AT1 receptors. DESIGN: To investigate blockade of presynaptic AT1 receptors, we studied the effect of AT1 receptor blockade on the sequelae of electrical stimulation of the thoracolumbar sympathetic outflow (0.25-8 Hz). To investigate the interaction between postsynaptic AT1 blockers and alpha-adrenoceptors, the effects of these compounds on pressor responses to exogenous noradrenaline were determined. To investigate blockade of postsynaptic AT1 receptors, we studied the effect of the AT1 antagonists on dose-response curves elicited by exogenous Ang II. RESULTS: The stimulation-induced increase in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and the Ang II-elicited DBP response were dose-dependently reduced by all AT1 receptor blockers. Interestingly, the greatest doses of the AT1 antagonists caused less than maximal reduction in the stimulation-induced increase in DBP, resulting in a U-shaped dose-response relationship. To compare sympathoinhibitory potencies, the doses that, at 2 Hz, reduced the change in DBP by 20 mmHg (ED20 values, expressed as -log mol/kg) were calculated; they were 5.50 +/- 0.12, 5.77 +/- 0.10, 6.32 +/- 0.12 and 5.62 +/- 0.13 for valsartan, candesartan, eprosartan and embusartan, respectively. The order of potency, therefore, was eprosartan> valsartan = candesartan = embusartan (where > signifies P < 0.05). To compare the order of potency for inhibition of the Ang II-induced increase in DBP, we calculated pA2 values (the X intercept in Schild regression). They were 7.20 +/- 0.17, 8.01 +/- 0.01, 7.20 +/- 0.03 and 7.25 +/- 0.16, for valsartan, candesartan, eprosartan and embusartan, respectively. Accordingly, the order of potency for inhibition of the direct pressor effects of Ang II was candesartan> valsartan = eprosartan = embusartan (where > signifies P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the pithed rat, the effects on DBP of stimulation of the thoracolumbar spinal cord are partly dependent on endogenously formed Ang II. These effects can be counteracted by blockade of presynaptically located AT1 receptors. No interaction was found between postsynaptically located AT1 receptors and alpha-adrenoceptors. The order of potency of the agents tested for sympathoinhibition clearly differed from that for inhibition of the direct pressor effects of Ang II. These findings suggest considerable differences in affinity of the various AT1 blockers for pre- and postsynaptic AT1 receptors.

Acrylates↗

Hypertension and changes of cognitive function in 81-year-old men: a 13-year follow-up of the population study "Men born in 1914", Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between blood pressure levels and decline of cognition has been discussed previously, but little is known about the confounding effect of lifestyle factors, antihypertensive treatment and disease in the elderly. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, changes of DBP and SBP and hypertension (HT) on cognitive function, while controlling for confounding factors. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study of men born in 1914 and residing in the municipality of Malmö studied at age 68 and 81 years. SETTING: Probands invited to a university clinic. SUBJECTS: One hundred and eighty-six out of 281 invited men still alive in 1995/6 participated in the most recent follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME: Change of the cognitive performance in the verbal (Paired Associates and Synonyms), spatial (Block Design and Benton Visual Retention test) and speed (Digit Symbol Substitution) functions. RESULTS: DBP by tertiles at 68 years, but not HT, was inversely related to verbal, spatial and speed performance at 81 years. Only spatial function was related to SBP at 68 years. The association between DBP and SBP by tertiles, and spatial functions (Block Design and Benton Visual Retention test) remained after controlling for education, marital status, smoking, alcohol and physical activity, and intermediates such as arteriosclerotic manifestations (block design, beta = 0.17; = 0.029) in multiple regression models. A decrease in DBP was likewise related to spatial (beta = 0.16; = 0.049) and speed performance (beta = 0.17; = 0.039) in the same regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is found to support the hypothesis that hypertension, especially high DBP in late midlife, is associated with a decline in spatial performance of cognitive functions in elderly men.

Aged↗

Age-dependent associations between blood pressure and coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic adults.

OBJECTIVE: The age-dependent roles of the components of blood pressure (BP) in the development of coronary artery calcification (CAC) are poorly understood. DESIGN: We examined systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP) as predictors of CAC in 830 asymptomatic, non-diabetic participants in a community-based study who were aged > or = 30 years and free of antihypertensive therapy or known cardiovascular disease. METHODS: CAC was measured with electron beam computed tomography. Tobit regression was used in two age groups (< 50 years and > or = 50 years) to evaluate the relationship of BP components with presence and quantity of CAC, adjusting for traditional coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors. RESULTS: Among those aged < 50 years, CAC was positively associated with SBP, DBP and MAP, considering each pressure individually and DBP was the strongest predictor (P = 0.0088). Among those aged > or = 50 years, CAC was positively associated with SBP (P = 0.0257) and PP (P = 0.0028), considered individually. When SBP and DBP were in the same model, presence and CAC quantity were positively associated with SBP (P = 0.0024) and negatively with DBP (P = 0.0401), favoring PP as the best predictor of CAC. CONCLUSIONS: SBP, DBP and PP have age-dependent roles in the prediction of CAC similar to their roles in prediction of future CAD events. These observations provide new evidence supporting the measurement of CAC as a surrogate of target organ disease and subsequently, as a predictor of increased risk of future CAD events.

Adolescent↗

A dose-finding, placebo-controlled study on extended-release felodipine once daily in treatment of hypertension.

Hypertensive patients received a beta-blocker plus placebo once daily for 4 weeks. If their diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was then 95-115 mm Hg, they were randomized to receive, in addition to the beta-blocker, placebo (n = 36), felodipine-extended release (ER) 10 mg (n = 36), or felodipine-ER 20 mg (n = 37) in a 4-week double-blind parallel-group trial. All medication was administered once daily and, when BP was measured 24 h after the last dose, felodipine-ER 10 mg reduced DBP by 14 +/- 9 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) from a mean of 103 mm Hg and felodipine-ER 20 mg reduced DBP by 18 +/- 9 mm Gg from 101 mm Hg. The reductions in DBP with both doses of felodipine were greater than reductions with placebo (5 +/- 8 mm Hg, from 102 mm Hg--both p less than 0.001). At the end of the study, 21% of patients receiving placebo had a DBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. In contrast, 69% of patients receiving felodipine-ER 10 mg and 82% receiving 20 mg attained this level. More than 90% of patients receiving 10 mg felodipine-ER once daily had a reduction in DBP greater than 5 mm Hg 24 h postdose. Felodipine-ER was well tolerated. Felodipine-ER once daily is an effective antihypertensive drug for patients who require therapy in addition to a beta-blocker; the tolerability in this study was good, and a starting dose greater than 10 mg once daily is not indicated.

Adult↗

Felodipine-ER once daily as monotherapy in hypertension.

One hundred and one hypertensive patients [diastolic pressure (dBP) 95-110 mm Hg after greater than or equal to 6 weeks with no antihypertensive therapy] were randomized to receive, double-blind, felodipine-ER 5 mg once daily (n = 49) or placebo (n = 52) for 2 weeks. Twenty-four hours post-dose, felodipine-ER 5 mg o.m. reduced dBP by a mean of 11 mm Hg; in contrast, dBP fell in the placebo group by 3 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). If the target dBP of less than or equal to 90 mm Hg was not attained at 2 weeks, the dose of felodipine-ER (or placebo) was doubled; if the target was not attained after a further 2 weeks, the doses were doubled again, to 20 mg felodipine-ER or placebo. If the target was achieved after 2 or 4 weeks, patients remained on that dose; the double-blind period for all patients was 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, the mean reduction in dBP in the felodipine-ER group was 14 mm Hg, significantly (p less than 0.001) greater than in the placebo group (8 mm Hg). Blood pressure "control" was defined prospectively as a seated dBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg: after 6 weeks, 67% of patients receiving felodipine-ER compared with 27% on placebo had a controlled blood pressure (p less than 0.001). The figures after 2 weeks were 45% on 5 mg felodipine-ER and 21% on placebo (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

Cross-desensitization between angiotensin II and endothelin-1 in the pithed rat.

It has been shown that in vitro angiotensin II (Ang II) potently downregulates endothelin-1 (ET-1) binding sites. In this study, we investigated in vivo the interactions between the renin-angiotensin system and ET-1. Sprague-Dawley rats were pithed, ventilated, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was recorded. ET-1 (1 nmol/kg) induced a biphasic response: a transient hypotension followed by a sustained increase of DBP. Captopril (5 mg/kg, i.v.) or Sar1-Ile8-Ang II (10 ng/kg/min) did not affect ET-1 responses. In other experiments, DBP was increased by infusion of methoxamine (MTX: 10, 20, 25, 32.5 micrograms/kg/min) or Ang II (50, 100, 150, 200 ng/kg/min). ET-1-induced hypotension correlated with the level of DBP (r = 0.94) for both agonists. The elevation of DBP in response to ET-1 was also related to the vascular tone but was dose-dependently attenuated by Ang II infusion when compared with MTX. Conversely, infusion of ET-1 (0.1 nmol/kg/min) blunted the pressor response to Ang II (0.1 micrograms/kg) but not to MTX (50 micrograms/kg). These doses induced the same increase of DBP in pithed control rats. Similarly, increased plasma renin activity induced by chronic salt depletion (0% NaCl) in pithed rats provoked a shift to the right of the dose-response curves to Ang II and ET-1 but not to MTX. These results suggest an in vivo cross-desensitization between ET-1 and Ang II.

1-Sarcosine-8-Isoleucine Angiotensin II↗

Does isradipine modified release 5 mg once daily reduce blood pressure for 24 hours?

Twelve patients with essential hypertension were randomized in a double-blind cross-over study to investigate the blood pressure BP-lowering activity of isradipine regular formulation (RF) 2.5 mg twice daily (between 7 and 8 a.m. and at approximately 6 p.m.), and isradipine modified release (MR), 5 mg once daily (between 7 and 8 a.m.). The two randomized treatment periods were separated by a placebo period. Patient compliance was similar between placebo and isradipine RF and MR treatment. As compared with placebo, isradipine RF decreased daytime BP by 10 mm Hg systolic (SBP, p < 0.001) and by 6 mm Hg diastolic (DBP, p < 0.01), and night SBP and DBP by 7 (p < 0.05) and 3 mm Hg (P = NS), respectively. Isradipine MR reduced the daytime SBP 8 mm Hg (p < 0.05) and DBP by 3 mm Hg (p = NS), and the night SBP by 1 mm Hg (p = NS) and DBP by < 1 mm Hg (P = NS). Analysis of variance showed that the interaction terms between the effects of treatment and time of day were not significant for SBP (F = 1.56, p = 0.24) or DBP (F = 1.40, p = 0.26) with isradipine RF treatment, but they were significant for SBP (F = 6.33, p = 0.03) and DBP (F = 5.12, p = 0.04) with isradipine MR treatment. Therefore, the BP-lowering effect of isradipine MR 5 mg once daily appears to weaken as the day progresses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

The aftereffects of dynamic exercise on ambulatory blood pressure.

PURPOSE: Despite the widespread belief that endurance exercise lowers blood pressure (BP), reports of the lack of such an effect are common when using ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring. This review examined the influence of dynamic exercise on ABP to elucidate possible reasons for conflicting reports. METHODS: Criteria for inclusion were dynamic exercise studies that involved ABP determinations after exercise. A total of 23 studies containing 34 groups of which 12 were normotensive and 22 hypertensive met these criteria. The groups primarily consisted of unmedicated, sedentary, overweight, non-Hispanic white men and women with a mean +/- SEM age of 43.9 +/- 1.5 yr. RESULTS: Baseline mean day systolic BP (SBP) was 137.3 +/- 2.1 mm Hg (95% confidence limits) (133.0, 141.5) and diastolic BP (DBP) was 86.7 +/- 1.5 mm Hg (83.7, 89.7). After exercise, day SBP (N = 34) was reduced an average of 3.2 +/- 1.0 (-5.2, -1.2) (P = 0.003) and DBP by 1.6 +/- 0.6 mm Hg (-2.9, -0.4) (P = 0.013); night SBP (N = 20) by 3.4 +/- 1.0 (-5.6, -1.2) (P = 0.005) and DBP by 3.0 +/- 1.4 mm Hg (-5.6, -0.4) (P = 0.025); and 24-h SBP (N = 17) by 3.2 +/- 0.8 (-4.9, -1.6) (P = 0.001) and DBP by 1.8 +/- 0.5 mm Hg (-2.9, -0.7) (P = 0.003). After detection of outlying cases using regression diagnostics, initial SBP accounted for 30% (P = 0.001) and 26% (P = 0.018) of the variance in the change in day and night SBP after exercise, respectively. Similarly, initial DBP explained 37% (P = 0.000) and 33% (P = 0.005) of the difference in day and night DBP after exercise. CONCLUSION: The ABP difference after exercise is a function of initial values such that groups with the highest baseline BP experience the greatest postexercise ABP reductions. The ABP dynamic exercise studies raise important methodological considerations that should be attended to in future work.

Adult↗

Comparison between casual blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring parameters in healthy and hypertensive adolescents.

Casual blood pressure measurements were compared with mean ambulatory blood pressure values during wakefulness and sleep in 45 normotensive and 30 hypertensive adolescents of both sexes aged 10-18 years. Two sets of auscultatory casual blood pressure were obtained, one in a pediatric office setting (office blood pressure), performed by the physician, and one in the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) unit, performed by a trained nurse, prior to the initiation of ABPM (pre-ABPM blood pressure). In normotensive and hypertensive subjects of both sexes, the mean office systolic blood pressure (SBP) was lower than the mean pre-ABPM SBP, and the mean office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was lower than the mean pre-ABPM DBP. In normotensive participants, the mean pre-ABPM SBP/DBP was lower than the mean ABPM SBP/DBP while awake, the mean ABPM SBP/DBP during sleep being lower than the mean ABPM SBP/DBP values while awake and the mean pre-ABPM SBP/DBP. No statistical difference was demonstrated between the mean office SBP and the mean ABPM SBP during sleep, the mean ABPM DBP during sleep being lower than the mean office DBP. The hypertensive adolescents presented a blood pressure profile similar to that of the normotensive group, albeit shifted upwards, with no significant difference between the mean pre-ABPM SBP and the mean ABPM SBP while awake but a higher mean pre-ABPM DBP than mean ABPM DBP while awake. This study suggests that, by evaluating the casual blood pressure in different environment/observer situations, the power of casual blood pressure to predict inadequate blood pressure control, manifested as abnormal ABPM parameters, can be enhanced. Our data indicate ABPM to be the method of choice for the early diagnosis and adequate follow-up of adolescent hypertension.

Adolescent↗

Analysis of blood pressure in children and adolescents reporting siesta during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

BACKGROUND: In adults, a siesta yields a blood pressure profile similar to that seen in nocturnal sleep. It is therefore stressed that siestas should not be included in daytime blood pressure measurement. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate blood pressure profiles in pediatric and adolescent patients who reported a siesta during 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). METHODS: Patients' diaries of actual sleep times were used to determine the periods of sleep (night-time and siesta) and daytime wakefulness. Ambulatory systolic and/or diastolic daytime and/or night-time hypertension was determined by comparing patients' measurements with normal values taken from published standards for healthy children and adolescents. Data obtained from 12 patients with ambulatory normotension and 12 patients with ambulatory hypertension, who were referred for an evaluation of hypertension or management of known hypertension, were analysed separately. RESULTS: Mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure values during the daytime awake period were significantly higher than the mean values for the period of daytime, including the siesta, both in patients with ambulatory normotension and in those with ambulatory hypertension (P<0.001 and P<0.01 for SBP and DBP, and P<0.001 and P<0.001 for SBP and DBP, respectively). The percentage night-time falls in SBP and DBP were 12.9+/-0.5 and 19.1+/-1.4 in patients with ambulatory normotension, and 7.1+/-1.5 and 12.9+/-2.2 in patients with ambulatory hypertension. These values were significantly higher when the siesta was excluded from the analysis in both groups (13.9+/-0.5% and 20.7+/-1.5%, P<0.001 and P<0.01 for SBP and DBP in patients with ambulatory normotension; 8+/-1.6% and 14.8+/-2.4%, P<0.001 and P<0.001 for SBP and DBP in patients with ambulatory hypertension, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: By ignoring the effect of the siesta, both the calculation of daytime blood pressure values and the analysis of day-night variability in children and adolescents undergoing ABPM may be erroneously interpreted.

Adolescent↗

Age-specific effects of systolic and diastolic blood pressures on mortality due to cardiovascular diseases among Japanese men (NIPPON DATA80).

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the relationship between mortality due to cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in young and elderly Japanese men in the absence of antihypertensive treatments. DESIGN: A 19-year cohort study using the 1980 National Survey of Cardiovascular Diseases and the identification of the underlying causes of death using national vital statistics data. METHODS: In 1999, a 19-year follow-up study was conducted among participants randomly selected from the Japanese population for the 1980 National Survey of Cardiovascular Diseases. Among the male participants that were not receiving antihypertensive treatment, information was obtained for about 91.3% of the subjects (n = 3779). Age-adjusted mortality rates using the person-year method were calculated to compare the relationships of SBP and DBP levels with CVD mortality for different age groups (aged 30-64, 65-74, and 75 years or more). RESULTS: The total number of observed person-years was 64 598 and the number of CVD-related deaths after 19 years was 253. Both SBP and DBP levels were significantly and linearly related to CVD mortality in the age groups 30-64 years (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively) and 65-74 years (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). In the group of participants that were at least 75 years old, however, no significant increase in the relative risk of CVD was observed with increasing DBP levels (P = 0.156), whereas the relative risk of CVD increased significantly with increasing SBP levels (P = 0.038). Multivariate analysis adjusting for major risk factors confirmed these relationships. Standardized hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of SBP were 1.53 (1.19-1.96) for 30-64 year olds, 1.70 (1.31-2.20) for 64-74 year olds, and 1.23 (1.03-1.47) for participants 75 years old or more, whereas those of DBP were 1.52 (1.12-2.06), 1.60 (1.21-2.10), and 1.10 (0.94-1.28), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that elevated SBP is an independent risk factor for CVD mortality for Japanese men of all ages, whereas elevated DBP is not an independent risk factor for CVD mortality for elderly men.

Adult↗

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in obese children: role of insulin resistance.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) parameters and insulin resistance in obese children. METHODS: A population of 56 obese prepubertal children was recruited for the study. They underwent ABPM, an oral glucose tolerance test and complete physical examination, including adiposity indexes such as body mass index (BMI), skinfolds, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and fat mass. RESULTS: The standard deviation score for BMI was significantly correlated with 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) (r = 0.30; P = 0.02) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (r = 0.29; P = 0.03), daytime SBP and DBP (r = 0.28; P = 0.04 and r = 0.32; P = 0.02), night-time SBP and DBP (r = 0.32; P = 0.01 and r = 0.27; P = 0.04). Fat mass was correlated with 24-h SBP (r = 0.46; P = 0.005), daytime SBP (r = 0.40; P = 0.01) and night-time SBP (r = 0.49; P = 0.03). No correlations were found between ABPM parameters and WHR. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between insulin resistance indexes, such as the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index, and 24-h DBP (r = 0.34; P = 0.01 and r = -0.29; P = 0.03), daytime DBP (r = 0.35; P = 0.009 and r = -0.34; P = 0.01) and daytime SBP (r = 0.32; P = 0.02 and r = -0.27; P = 0.04). Only 24-h and daytime DBP remained correlated with insulin resistance after adjustment for obesity. The analysis of the circadian rhythm of blood pressure revealed that 24 out the 56 children were non-dippers. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that adiposity and insulin resistance have an important role in influencing blood pressure in obese children, and also show a high prevalence of non-dipping phenomenon. This is of particular relevance because blood pressure tracks from childhood into adulthood and an already early-life high blood pressure is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk.

Blood Pressure↗

Phosphorylation of adenovirus DNA-binding protein.

Evidence is presented here which indicates that the adenovirus DNA-binding protein (DBP) is phosphorylated at a tyrosine residue early in infection. This was suggested by the discovery that a proportion of the label in 32P-labelled DBP was resistant to alkali, and was substantiated by acid hydrolysis of DBP immunoprecipitates and by immunoblotting with a monoclonal antibody against phosphotyrosine. Treatment of [35S]methionine-labelled DBPs with chymotrypsin produced fragments of apparent Mr 45K and 39K whereas digestion of 32P-labelled DBP resulted in fragments of 45K and 26K. Consideration of the distribution of 32P label and its alkali stability in these fragments suggested that chymotrypsin cleaved populations of DBP at different sites depending on their phosphorylation states. The conservation, in all of the seven adenovirus serotypes sequenced, of a tyrosine residue (at amino acid 195 in adenovirus type 2) together with its surrounding residues, suggests that phosphorylation/dephosphorylation at this tyrosine residue may be important in various functions ascribed to the DBP.

Adenoviruses, Human↗

Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein in elderly people. Effects of institutionalization, protein-energy malnutrition and inflammation.

Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-D) and vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) were measured in institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly people. The institutionalized subjects were found to have low serum 25-OH-D in confirmation of other studies, but their serum DBP levels were similar to those found in non-institutionalized elderly subjects. Serum DBP concentrations were slightly higher in elderly females than in males, while no age dependence was found for DBP. Elderly people with protein-energy malnutrition who lived in their own homes had slightly reduced serum DBP and 25-OH-D levels. Elderly subjects with infections or other diseases causing acute inflammation, as indicated by an elevated serum haptoglobin and C-reactive protein, had normal levels of DBP.

Adult↗