Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Physical loading and performance as predictors of back pain in healthy adults. A 5-year prospective study.

We investigated muscle strength, aerobic power, and occupational and leisure-time physical loading as predictors of back pain in a 5-year follow-up study. A cohort of 456 adults aged 25, 35, 45 and 55 years, free of back pain, participated in measurements of anthropometric characteristics, aerobic power and muscle strength characteristics at baseline. The subjects' levels and types of physical activity and occupational physical loading were also determined. At 5 years after the baseline examinations 356 of these subjects (78.1%) were reached by mail, and 262 of them (73.6%) properly completed and returned a questionnaire including a detailed back pain history for the 5 years following the baseline measurements. Of this number 56 subjects (21%) who reported back pain (> 30 on a scale from 0 to 100) and functional impairment during the 5-year follow-up composed the marked back pain group. Other subjects (n = 71, 27%) noting lesser symptoms were included in the mild back pain group; 135 subjects (52%) reported having had no back pain. The subjects with marked back pain were on average taller than the subjects without back pain, while no such difference was found in body mass. Heavy occupational musculoskeletal loading (P = 0.005) and high general occupational physical demands (P = 0.036) predicted future back pain. Leisure-time physical activity, aerobic power or muscle strength characteristics were not predictive of future back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Cross-validation of the Back Pain Classification Scale with chronic, intractable pain patients.

The current study investigated the utility of the Back Pain Classification Scale with chronic, intractable low back pain and headache patients. Subjects consisted of 50 chronic low back pain and 50 chronic headache patients referred to a university based Pain Center for evaluation. Data indicated that subjects were a representative sample of severely intractable chronic pain patients typically referred for Pain Center evaluation and treatment. Each was administered the Back Pain Classification Scale as part of a thorough physical and psychological/behavioral evaluation. All subjects were classified by blind review of medical records into one of two categories: (1) presence of psychopathologically based pain complaint with little or no pathophysiological findings and (2) presence of pathophysiologically based pain complaints with little or no psychopathological findings. Subjects were also independently classified from blind review of their scores on the Back Pain Classification Scale into one of these two categories. Findings revealed that the Back Pain Classification Scale accurately predicted the actual classification of 80% of the low back pain patients (i.e., 30% above baseline prediction rate) and only 60% of the chronic headache patients (i.e., only equal to the baseline prediction rate). Furthermore, the scale was found to be most accurate in predicting low back pain patients with primary psychopathologically based pain. It was concluded that the Back Pain Classification Scale was an empirically valid instrument to use with chronic low back pain patients, but not with chronic headache patients. This lack of utility with chronic headache patients was also viewed as support for the construct validity of the scale. Wider use of the scale with chronic low back pain patients was suggested.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The influence of intense exercise-based physical therapy program on back pain anticipated before and induced by physical activities.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pain anticipated before and induced by physical activities has been shown to influence the physical performance of patients with chronic back pain. Limited data exist as to the influence of treatment on this component of pain. PURPOSE: This study attempted to determine if pain anticipated before and induced by physical activities was altered during an exercise-oriented physical therapy program for chronic back pain. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Subjects were recruited from three physical therapy sites with similar spine rehabilitation programs that used intense exercise delivered in a group format. During the recruitment period, 70 subjects with chronic low back pain and disability agreed to participate and complied with recommended treatments. The primary outcome measures were anticipated and induced pain as assessed by visual analog scales (VAS) during six tests of back flexibility and strength. Additional outcome measures included the performance levels of these six tests (trunk flexion, extension, straight leg raising, back strength, lifting from floor to waist and waist to shoulder height), global back and leg VAS and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire scores. METHODS: At evaluation for the spine rehabilitation programs, we recorded the anticipated and induced pain levels associated with the six tests of back function, the performance levels on each test and global pain and disability scores. Subjects then participated in the spine rehabilitation program that consisted of intense exercise delivered up to three times per week, for 2 hours over a period of 6 weeks. All outcome measures were reassessed at discharge. Pre- and posttreatment outcome scores were statistically compared using paired sample t tests and chi-squared test. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to compare anticipated and induced pain results with global back and leg pain VAS scores, Oswestry scores and physical performance levels for each physical test. RESULTS: Most measures of anticipated and induced pain improved between evaluation and discharge. Improvements were noted for global back pain (p<.001), leg pain (p=.001), disability (p<.001) and performance on each physical testing (p<.001) after treatment. Performances on all physical testing correlated with anticipated and induced pain for all tests at evaluation but only for measures of flexibility at discharge. Improvements in global pain and disability correlated with improvements in anticipated and induced pain with physical testing. CONCLUSION: Anticipated and induced pain with physical activities was lessened after physical therapy using exercise. Anticipated and induced pain with physical activities related to physical performance levels, global pain and disability ratings. These findings may help explain how exercise exerts a positive influence on chronic back pain and disability.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Epidemiology of low back pain.

At present, although there have been many epidemiological studies of risk factors for low back pain, there are few risk factors established in prospective studies; and our understanding of them remains relatively crude. Individuals in jobs requiring manual materials handling, particularly repeated heavy lifting and lifting while twisting, are at increased risk of back pain leading to work absence. In addition, exposure to whole-body vibration and job requirements for static postures are associated with back pain. Individual trunk strength has not been consistently demonstrated as associated with back pain; although there is some suggestion that when work requirements for heavy lifting exceed individual capacities, back pain is more likely to occur. The pattern of peak age at onset in the 20's is consistent with back pain development early in working life. Among other individual characteristics, only cigarette smoking has consistently been associated with back pain; and the biological mechanism for this finding is not understood. Evidence with respect to spinal flexibility, aerobic capacity, educational attainment and other variables is suggestive but not consistent. There is some evidence that the individual's relation to work, expressed as job satisfaction or supervisor rating, is also related to work absence due to back pain. While it is possible to describe, however crudely, the characteristics placing people at risk for back pain leading to work absence and/or medical attention, the problem of predicting chronicity and thus identifying patients for more intensive clinical intervention remains unresolved. At this time, only age of the patient and certain clinical features of the back pain such as the presence of sciatic symptoms, duration of the current episode, and history of prior episodes are consistently demonstrated predictors. In chronic patients, there is suggestive evidence that spinal flexibility, trunk strength, and certain psychological characteristics such as coping skills, fear and avoidance of pain or movement, job satisfaction, attribution of fault and hysterical or hypochondriacal features are associated with treatment failure. In addition, there is suggestive evidence that the availability of alternative work placement may allow for earlier return to work than otherwise. While the availability of disability compensation in excess of usual wages may serve as a disincentive to return to work. The latter-cited remain to be verified, while findings in chronic patients remain to be tested in acute. Further, the role of physical demands of work in duration of back pain episodes has not been well studied.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

The prevalence of low back pain and associations with body fatness, fat distribution and height.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations of low back pain symptoms with waist circumference, height, waist to hip ratio and body mass index, and to test the interactions between (1) waist circumference and height, and (2) waist to hip ratio and body mass index. SETTING: Cross-sectional study set in The Netherlands of a random sample of 5887 men and 7018 women aged 20-60 y. RESULTS: The prevalences of low back pain in men and women in the past 12 months were 46% and 52%, of whom 17% and 21% had low back pain for a total of 12 or more weeks, and 13% and 18% had symptoms suggestive of intervertebral disc herniation. After adjustments for age, smoking and education, more women in the highest tertile of waist circumference reported low back pain in the past 12 months (odds ratio = 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.4), low back pain for a total of 12 or more weeks (odds ratio = 1.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-1.8), and intervertebral disc herniation symptoms (odds ratio = 1.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.6) than women in the lowest waist tertile. Corresponding values of low back pain symptoms for women with high body mass index or high waist to hip ratio were similar to those with high waist. There were no significant differences between men in different tertiles of waist, waist to hip ratio or body mass index reporting low back pain symptoms. Tallest subjects did not report low back pain symptoms more often than shortest subjects. There was no significant interactions between waist and height or between waist to hip ratio and body mass index on low back pain symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Women who are overweight or with a large waist have a significantly increased likelihood of low back pain. There are no significant interactions between waist and height, or waist to hip ratio and body mass index on low back pain symptoms.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2003

Function and back symptoms in older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between back symptoms and limitations in nine specific functional activities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: This study was conducted as part of the Framingham Heart Study, a population-based study performed on a representative sample of community-living residents of Framingham, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects consisted of 1,007 surviving members of the original cohort who participated in the 22nd Biennial Examination in 1992-93. Ages ranged from 70 to 100. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were asked whether they experienced pain, aching, or stiffness in their back on most days and whether they had difficulty performing nine specific functional skills. Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals are reported for the entire sample and within categories of sex. The proportion of functional limitations attributable to back symptoms and the proportion of limitations ascribed by subjects to back symptoms among subjects with these limitations are also reported. RESULTS: The results provide evidence of a relationship between back symptoms and functional limitations. ORs were highest for difficulty standing in one place for about 15 minutes, pushing or pulling a large object, and walking half a mile. Of those with back symptoms, 43% to 63% of limitations in activities were due to back symptoms. Among all subjects, back symptoms were so prevalent that 18% to 34% of all functional limitations were attributable to back symptoms. The association between back symptoms and functional limitations was especially strong in women. CONCLUSION: Back symptoms account for a large percentage of functional limitations in older adults, especially in women.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2003

Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. AIMS: To determine the prevalence of back pain during pregnancy and to delineate the factors associated with the development and persistence of such symptoms 2 years after delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational cohort. Consecutive patients in a low-risk obstetric population with singleton pregnancies were surveyed for back pain symptoms during pregnancy in the early postpartum period by a structured questionnaire. Data from this survey were then correlated with the details of labor and pregnancy outcome, as well as epidemiological, occupation and work data. A follow-up questionnaire survey was administered 24 months after delivery to the group who reported back pain symptoms in the first survey. The absence/presence of persistent symptoms at 24 months was correlated with the characteristics of their pregnancy, as well as their daily life activities at the time of the survey. RESULTS: A total 326 patients with complete data were recruited. Two hundred and fifty (76.6%) reported one or more significant episodes of back pain during their pregnancy. Significantly more patients with presence of pain in pregnancy had history of previous back pain episodes when not pregnant (48% vs. 19.7%, p < 0.001), as well as during previous pregnancies (66% vs. 40%, p < 0.025), or in the postpartum period (40% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between those with or without pain in their pregnancy outcome. Complete data on 189 of the 250 study patients (75.6%) were available for analysis at 24 months after delivery. The incidence of persistent back pain symptoms was 21.1% (n = 40). Those with persistent pain were older, had significantly earlier onset of pain symptoms in the index pregnancy compared with those without pain at 24 months, and they also had their worse symptoms at an earlier gestation during the index pregnancy. Moreover, those with persistent pain had a higher weight gain at 24 months compared with their preindex pregnancy weight (6.8 kg, SD3.0) compared with those without further pain (4.0 kg, SD2.8) (p < 0.01), as well as less weight loss compared with their early postpartum weight (8.1 kg, SD4.8 vs. 1.1.5 kg, SD5.6) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The main factors associated with development of back pain were previous episodes of back pain while non-pregnant or pregnant. The occurrence of back pain during pregnancy did not affect the pregnancy outcome. The main risk factors associated with persistent back pain at 24 months appeared to be the onset of severe pain at an early gestation in the index pregnancy, as well as the inability to reduce weight to their pre-pregnant level.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Chronic back pain in the general population in Germany 2002/2003: prevalence and highly affected population groups].

Back pain is one of the most common complaints in the general population and chronic back pain is a major Public Health burden. However, the prevalence of chronic back pain in Germany is not known. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of chronic back pain in the general adult population in Germany and to identify highly affected population groups. A nation-wide computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) survey was conducted with 8,318 men and women aged 18 years and older residing in German households. Participants were selected using the Gabler-Häder telephone sampling method and the next-birthday method. The one-year prevalence of chronic back pain defined as daily or almost daily back pain over a period of three months was 16 % in men and 22 % in women, the lifetime prevalence 24 % in men and 30 % in women. The 12-months prevalence of any back pain was 66 % in women and 58 % in men. Back pain on the day preceding the interview was reported by 18 % of men and 27 % of women and had a median intensity on a 1 - 10 point scale of 5 in women and 4 in men. Factors independently associated with chronic back pain in the past 12 months were age, female sex, a history of arthritis, self-reported depression, lower educational level, current unemployment, overweight or obesity, no sports, smoking and living with a partner. In conclusion, chronic back pain is a highly prevalent complaint in the general population in Germany. The association not only with bone and joint diseases but also with depression, a lower level of education and with certain lifestyle behaviours emphasises that back pain should not be viewed only in the context of the spine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of low back pain risks in a beef skinning operation.

The low back pain risks in a beef skinning operation at a high stand kill floor workstation was evaluated. The increases in compressive forces at lower back (L5/S1) between normal slump (back angle 25 degrees, measured in the sagittal plane) and severe (45 degrees ) and between normal slump and very severe (70 degrees ) bent back postures were 387 N or 28% and 616 N or 45%, respectively. The high spine load coupled with high level of repetition can have a high probability of fatigue failure in the spine structural members. Non-neutral back posture for a large portion of the total work time can be a low back pain risk factor. The videotape analysis showed that the times involved during the task performance for the bent back (more than 25 degrees ) and severe bent back (more than 45 degrees ) were 48.4 and 33.5% of the total cycle time, respectively. The upper limit from OWAS (Ovako Working Posture Analysis System) for bent back posture is 30% of the total cycle time. The bent and twisted back posture (both more than 25 degrees ) time was 10.4% compared to OWAS limit of 5%. This indicated that actions are needed in the near future to alleviate the risk of low back pain. Ergonomics redesign of the workstation was recommended for the operation.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Physical activity and four-year development of back strength in children.

Physical activity in children is important, both for its direct benefits and for establishing potentially lasting future behaviors. Understanding the development of back strength in children is also important, because decreased back strength is associated with low back pain in adults. We hypothesized the following: (1) a substantial percentage of children do not participate in adequate physical activity; (2) the development of back strength corresponds to the development of strength of appendicular muscles; (3) there is a positive relationship between physical activity and back strength. The study included 53 boys and 43 girls, aged 10 to 19 yr, who had undergone isometric strength testing 4 yr previously. From responses to a questionnaire, each child's level of physical and sedentary activity was calculated. Isometric back flexion and extension were measured with the same method used 4 yr previously. Statistical analyses were performed, including quadratic regressions to estimate the rate of increase in strength, height, and weight. The following results were found: (1) during the month before testing, 21 children participated in physical activity for less than 30 min/day; (2) the level of physical activity was significantly associated with back flexion and back extension (P = 0.03 for both); (3) the peak rate of increase in back strength occurred approximately 1 yr after the peak rate of increase in height. We conclude the following: (1) measures should be taken to increase the involvement of children in athletic activities; 2) physical activity may be important in the development of back strength; (3) the pattern of back strength development seems to be the same as that for development of muscles of the appendicular skeleton.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Regression of back and posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, consecutive cohort analysis of the regression of the incidence and intensity of back and posterior pelvic pain after delivery in pregnant women was done. OBJECTIVE: To identify back and posterior pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to 5 months after delivery and to illustrate differences between these two pain types. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic back pain may start during a pregnancy, and regression of unspecified back pain after delivery may be slow and incomplete. Few studies have distinguished back pain from posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy, and no study has presented follow-up data after delivery with respect to pain types. METHODS: One hundred and sixty four of 368 pregnant women studied had back or posterior pelvic pain and were offered individual group physiotherapy and training. The women were observed until 5 months after delivery. Standardized clinical examination protocols and questionnaires were used. RESULTS: Posterior pelvic pain was experienced by 124 women, and back pain was experienced by 40 women during pregnancy. After delivery, however, back pain was more common. Pain intensity was higher among women with posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy, whereas after delivery pain intensity was higher among women with back pain. A correlation was found between the presence of high pain intensity during pregnancy and little regression of pain after delivery. CONCLUSIONS: One of every three pregnant women studied experienced posterior pelvic pain, and one of every nine women experienced back pain. Posterior pelvic pain was more intense during pregnancy, and back pain was more intense and more common after delivery. High pain intensity in pregnancy indicated a bad prognosis.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed1996

Low back pain. A primary care challenge.

Back pain is an important problem for primary care physicians; it is common, costly, and controversial. Back pain is the second leading symptom prompting all physician visits in the United States. There are wide geographic variations in medical care for this problem, and surgical rates in the United States are twice those of most developed countries. The treatment of back pain has followed a series of fads and fashions, and work disability resulting from back pain continues to rise. For all these reasons, primary care clinicians have an important role in improving the care of patients with low back pain. Primary care clinicians face unique problems in treating these patients. First, in primary care, most patients have uncomplicated low back pain, and identifying the rare patient with an underlying malignancy or neurologic deficit is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Second, these practitioners face two populations with nonspecific back pain: one that is likely to improve no matter what (who mostly need reassurance), and a smaller group (about 20%) who are prone to development of chronic back pain and who present complex psychosocial and occupational problems. Third, these problems must be dealt with in the typical setting of a 15-minute patient visit. Finally, lifestyle changes in exercise, weight loss, and smoking cessation may be major parts of patient treatment, and improving compliance with such interventions always is a major challenge. Primary care investigators studying back pain face at least three important challenges. One is to identify more efficient diagnostic strategies that will alleviate doctors' and patients' anxieties. Second is to develop a better theory to explain the large majority of episodes of nonspecific low back pain. At present, competing theories generate competing and conflicting treatments, generating frustration among patients and loss of credibility for clinicians. Third, we need better science, with greater methodologic rigor in the evaluation of the many nonsurgical treatments used for back pain in the primary care setting.

Humans↗
PubMed1996

The course of back pain in primary care.

STUDY DESIGN: Review paper of outcome studies among primary care back pain patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the short-term and long-term pain and functional outcomes of patients with back pain who are seeking treatment in primary care settings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain has been viewed as running either an acute or a chronic course, but most patients experience recurrent back pain. This review summarizes outcome studies in light of the episodic course of back pain. METHODS: Studies reporting pain and functional outcome data for consecutive primary care patients with back pain were reviewed. RESULTS: Back pain among primary care patients typically is a recurrent condition for which definitions of acute and chronic pain based on a single episode are inadequate. Because a majority of patients experience recurrences, describing only the outcome of the initial back pain episode may convey a more favorable picture of long-term outcome than warranted. For the short-term follow-up evaluation, most patients improve considerably during the first 4 weeks after seeking treatment. Sixty-six percent to 75% continue to experience at least mild back pain 1 month after seeking care. At 1 month, approximately 33% report continuing pain of at least moderate intensity, whereas 20-25% report substantial activity limitations. For the long-term follow-up (1 year or more) period, approximately 33% report intermittent or persistent pain of at least moderate intensity, one in seven continue to report back pain of severe intensity, and one in five report substantial activity limitations. CONCLUSION: Results from existing studies suggest that back pain among primary care patients typically runs a recurrent course characterized by variation and change, rather than an acute, self-limiting course.

Back Pain↗
PubMed1997

The association between clinical findings on physical examination and self-reported severity in back pain. Results of a population-based study.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional population-based study of back pain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between clinical findings on physical examination and subjective severity in nonspecific back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Assessment of severity of back pain always has been controversial. Most studies evaluating the role of clinical findings in back pain have been hospital- or clinic-based, often representing a highly select population. This selection is avoided in the population-based approach of the present study. METHODS: Approximately 4,000 German inhabitants of Lubeck, aged 25-74, were selected randomly from the local population registry and received a postal questionnaire. Those who reported "back pain today" (n = 1200) or "back pain within the past 12 months but no back pain before" (n = 75) were invited to come in for a clinical examination. Thirty-four physical measurements were taken. They were divided into four groups: static measurements, dynamic measurements, neurologic findings, and non-organic physical signs. Self-reported severity of back pain was measured by a pain questionnaire and a 12-item activities of daily living list to assess functional disability. RESULTS: Within each of the four groups of physical measurements, those that corresponded best with the subjective severity of back pain could be identified (e.g., rotation, lateral flexion, and fingertip-floor distance, scoliosis, the position of the side plumb line, and pain on percussion of the spine pseudo-Lasegue and hand muscle-strength). Those that corresponded best could be differentiated statistically from less correlative measurements such as kyphosis and lordosis; flexion of the lumbar, thoracic, or cervical spine, abdominal muscle strength, and axial loading. The agreement between the classification of back pain severity based on clinical findings and the classification based on self-reports was moderate (kappa = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of severity in back pain can only partly be based on the clinical findings of a physical examination. There is a relatively weak agreement between the results of physical examination and the subjective reporting of pain and disability.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

Why has the search for causes of low back pain largely been nonconclusive?

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional data were collected in a postal questionnaire within the framework of a 5-year randomized, controlled, prospective, population-based study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate to what extent associations differ or concur when correlates of low back pain are rested against various subdefinitions of low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous factors have been suspected to cause low back pain, but findings have not been constantly reproduced in epidemiologic studies. METHODS: Data were collected on 748 people reporting nonspecific low back pain some time during the year preceding the survey. Six correlates of low back pain (age, sex, marital status, attitude to a healthy life-style, self-reported physical activity at work, and smoking) were cross-tabulated against nonspecific low back pain and against four subgroups of low back pain. RESULTS: There was only one statistically significant strong association between the potential risk indicators and the nonspecific definition of low back pain, but several emerged when the low back pain group was split into subgroups. Different subgroups of low back pain did, indeed, relate differently to the various correlates. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to define some clinically relevant subgroups of low back pain to accelerate the search for causal mechanisms.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Physical workload and ergonomic factors associated with prevalence of back and neck pain in urban transit operators.

STUDY DESIGN: Back and neck pain was studied cross-sectionally in 1,449 urban transit drivers by linking medical data, self-reported ergonomic factors, and company records on job history. OBJECTIVES: The goal was to examine the relation between physical workload, ergonomic factors, and the prevalence of back and neck pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Researchers, to date, have not found an independent effect of ergonomic factors on back and neck pain while accounting for the effects of past and current physical workload. METHODS: Self-reported ergonomic factors, vehicle type, physical workload (measured as duration of driving), height, weight, age, and gender were analyzed in relation to back and neck pain, using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Physical workload showed a positive dose-response relation with back and neck pain after controlling for vehicle type, height, weight, age, and gender. The odds ratio for 10 years of driving was 3.43. Additional adjustment for ergonomic factors decreased this odds ratio to 2.55. Six out of seven ergonomic factors were significantly related to the prevalence of back and neck pain after adjustment for age, gender, height, weight, and physical workload. Problems with adjusting the seat had the largest effect (odds ratio = 3.52). Women had back and neck pain twice as frequently as men. CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis of a causal role of physical workload for the development of back and neck pain. Ergonomic factors partially mediated the risk of back and neck pain associated with driving, suggesting a potential for prevention of back and neck pain by ergonomic redesign of transit vehicles. Elevated risks for back and neck pain for female drivers were not explained by anthropometric and ergonomic factors.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

The effects of comorbidity and other factors on medical versus chiropractic care for back problems.

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of adults in the United States who reported at least one back-related visit to a health care professional during a 2-week reference period. OBJECTIVES: To estimate and compare the effects of comorbidity and other factors on self-reported use of medical and chiropractic care for back problems in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although back pain is the second most frequent primary symptom reported by patients seeking medical care and the most frequent primary symptom among chiropractic patients, there is a dearth of research on the predictors of chiropractic and medical care among back pain patients. METHODS: Data from the 1989 National Health Interview Survey were used to perform a cross-sectional analysis of adults who sought care for a back-related condition. The primary predictor variables included comorbidity and associated disability, sociodemographic variables, and back-problem-related variables. Weighted logistic regression modeling was performed to estimate odds ratios adjusted for the effects of covariates. RESULTS: Of the 4790 adults with reported back problems, 931 sought health care for their back condition during the 2-week reference period. Adults with disabling comorbidities and back-related restricted-activity days were relatively less likely to use chiropractic care than primary medical care. Those who were male, high-school educated, single, employed, and with more than nine doctor visits during the previous 12 months were relatively more likely to use chiropractic care than primary medical care. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of comorbidity-related or back-related disability, as well as other factors, affect the type of care sought for back conditions among adults in the United States.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Natural history of low back pain. A longitudinal study in nurses.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal study. OBJECTIVES: To assess the natural history of low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most episodes of low back pain resolve or improve within a few weeks, but chronic or recurrent symptoms are common. Previous studies of natural history have usually relied on people's long-term recall of symptoms, or they have been limited to patients seeking clinical care. METHODS: Nurses (1,165 women) completed a baseline questionnaire and up to eight follow-up questionnaires 3 months apart. Each questionnaire asked whether they had experienced low back pain in the past month. One-month prevalences of pain at specified follow-ups were calculated according to histories of pain reported on earlier questionnaires. RESULTS: The 1-month prevalence of low back pain at individual follow-ups ranged from 16% to 19%. Of 906 women who completed the baseline questionnaire and at least three follow-up questionnaires, 38 (4.2%) reported pain every time they returned a questionnaire, and 190 (21.0%) reported pain on at least three occasions. The presence or absence of low back pain at baseline was highly predictive of future pain throughout follow-up. The longer that back pain was consistently reported, the more likely it was to be present at the next follow-up. Later risk was lowest in women who reported no back pain at baseline or either of the first two follow-ups. Back pain carried a worse prognosis if it was disabling or associated with sciatica. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the importance of back pain duration and the occurrence of associated disability and sciatica as predictors of future symptoms, and allow more reliable quantification of the natural history of back pain in women of working age. In the absence of other information, the differentials in risk associated with a person's history of back pain appear to remain constant for a period of at least 2 years.

Adult↗