Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “APPENDICITIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Diagnosis of appendicitis in the ED: comparison of surgical and nonsurgical residents.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a surgery-based (SB) versus nonsurgery-based (NSB) training background of residents on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the emergency department (ED). The medical records of 641 adult patients who had undergone an appendectomy during a 3-year period (July 1996 to June 1999) were reviewed. All the patients were divided into NSB-in charge (n = 367) and SB-in charge (n = 274) groups, and demographic and clinical data recorded. Both groups' patients showed no differences in either negative appendectomy or perforation rates. However, NSB group patients had longer in-hospital delays in comparison with SB group patients (12.0 +/- 0.7 versus 9.6 +/- 0.4 hours, P <.05). This longer stay time mainly occurred in the patients with negative exploration and uncomplicated appendicitis P <.05). In both groups, patients with complicated appendicitis had longer prehospital delay of presentation than those with uncomplicated appendicitis. (2.0 +/- 0.2 versus 1.2 +/- 0.1 days in NSB group; 2.5 +/- 0.5 versus 1.3 +/- 0.2 days in SB group, P <.01). The NSB residents tended to order more computed tomography (CT) scans than SB residents (12% versus 5.1%, P <.05). With the application of a CT scan, the negative appendectomy rate was reduced significantly from 23% to 12%. We concluded that under the supervision of board-certified emergency physicians, the NSB residents had capabilities similar to SB residents in making correct diagnoses of acute appendicitis. In addition, close observation of equivocal cases in the ED did not necessarily increase the perforation rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Specialty versus generalist care of children with appendicitis: an outcome comparison.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Some Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO) limit access of their members to specialists to lower costs. The purpose of this study is to determine whether this policy affects the outcome of children with appendicitis. METHODS: At a large academic medical center, children 17 years or younger with appendicitis were treated either by an HMO Adult General Surgical Service (group A) or a Pediatric Surgical Service (group B). Board certified pediatric surgeons were not available on the HMO surgical service. Anesthesia, surgical residents, nursing, and ancillary support services were identical in both groups. Study parameters included imaging tests performed, operation type, complications, readmissions, and length of stay. Results were analyzed using chi(2) and Fischer's Exact tests. RESULTS: One-hundred seventy-five consecutive children underwent appendectomy, 96 in group A and 79 in group B. In patients with simple acute appendicitis, there was no significant difference between group A and group B for complications, readmissions, second operation, or length of stay. In patients with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis there was a significant difference between group A and group B for type of operation (laparoscopic appendectomy, group A, 4 of 27 v. group B, 0 of 34; P =.04); complications (group A, 9 of 27 v. group B, 3 of 34; P =.025); readmissions (group A, 6 of 27 v. group B, 0 of 34; P =.001); second operation (group A, 6 of 27 v. group B, 2 of 34; P =.001); and mean total length of stay in days (group A, 8.6 of 27 v. group B, 5.4 of 34; P =.05). CONCLUSIONS: Children with significantly perforated appendicitis have lower complication rates and shorter lengths of hospital stay when treated by pediatric surgeons as compared with HMO adult general surgeons.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Advancements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children and adolescents.

The aim of our study was to further improve the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children and adolescents. All diagnostic parameters from the patients' medical history (duration and quality of abdominal pain, stool behaviour), the laboratory (leukocytes, C-reactive protein), the clinic (defense, tenderness on percussion, nausea, vomiting, dry tongue) and repeated ultrasound investigations (visualisation of the appendix, indirect signs of an inflammatory process in the appendix region) were documented prospectively and were re-assessed with regard to their diagnostic value. As an additional parameter, procalcitonin was determined. 1156 patients (593 male/563 female) with a mean age of 9.51 years (+/- 1.2 yrs) (max. 15 yrs/min. 2.3 yrs), referred to the department with acute abdominal pain, were examined. 233 (141 male/92 female; 20.1 %) of these patients with a mean age of 10.47 years (+/- 1.1 yr) had appendicitis. Based on the patients' medical history, laboratory findings, the initial clinical investigation and the initial ultrasound investigation, 173 patients (74.3 % of the later operated 233 children with appendicitis) were diagnosed with certainty. The diagnosis of 60 patients (25.7 %) of this group remained uncertain. These patients received a saline enema (Clysmol, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company) and were subjected to a second clinical and sonographic investigation after approximately four hours of parenteral fluid substitution (Ringer's lactate, Mayrhofer Pharmazeutika Company, 4 ml/kg/h). The other 923 patients (79.83 %) were discharged and were followed up as outpatients in the following days. Based on this stepwise procedure, the percentage of correctly diagnosed appendicitis could be increased to 97.4 %. The measurement of procalcitonin proved to be of no value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. It may be concluded that in children with abdominal pain, high diagnostic accuracy can only be achieved by a carefully combined evaluation of all individual diagnostic parameters and repeated investigations.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1986

Graded compression sonography in acute appendicitis.

Acute appendicitis never was a radiologically established diagnosis. A study on sonography in acute appendicitis was published recently in which in 89% of cases the inflamed appendix could be demonstrated by ultrasound, utilising 5 and 7.5 MHz intraoperative linear array transducers. Our study was started to evaluate the possibilities of a standard 7.5 MHz sector transducer in detecting acute appendicitis. In our study sonography was correctly diagnosed in 72% of cases, but it became apparent that with the larger format transducer used in our study the retrocaecal appendix could not be demonstrated in the majority of cases. The reliability of sonography in detecting acute appendicitis is not high enough to be used on a large scale but sonography can play a role in doubtful cases of suspected acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Germany. SUBJECTS: 120 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis as a differential diagnosis, whose clinical findings were not enough to make operation essential, but were too severe to send home. INTERVENTIONS: CT and US of the appendix. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value. RESULTS: The results were correlated with surgical and histopathological findings at appendicectomy or clinical follow-up. 93 patients had acute appendicitis, 27 patients did not. The sensitivity of CT was 95% and of US 87%. The corresponding specificities were 89% and 74%, positive predictive values 97% and 92%, negative predictive values 83% and 63%. In the 27 patients who did not have acute appendicitis, the correct diagnosis was established with CT in 14 patients and with US in eight. CONCLUSION: CT is more sensitive and specific than US in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis, but in whom the presentation is equivocal. The use of unenhanced spiral CT led to a significant improvement in the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis and a lower negative appendicectomy rate.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of ultrasound (US) as part of an algorithm to establish the indication for laparotomy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. DESIGN: Prospective investigation. SETTING: University department of surgery, Germany. SUBJECTS: 669 unselected patients admitted with suspected acute appendicitis. INTERVENTIONS: Clinicopathological and procedural diagnoses of the algorithm were evaluated by correlating clinical and US findings with the results of laparotomy in 171 patients of whom 143 had acute appendicitis (prevalence 21%), and clinical as well as follow up data in the remainder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The major clinicopathological variables were accuracy and positive predictive value; the rate of negative laparotomies and that of bad diagnostic errors served as the main procedural variables. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the clinical diagnosis were 0.503, 0.950, and 0.855, respectively (positive predictive value: PPV 0.734, negative predictive value: NPV 0.875), those of ultrasound: 0.797, 0.967, and 0.931 (PPV 0.870, NPV 0.946); and 0.853, 0.927, and 0.940 at the end of the algorithm (PPV 0.762, NPV 0.958). However, the algorithm would have resulted in a significant increase in the rate of unnecessary laparotomies (from 13% to 16%). A revised clinical algorithm gave an overall diagnostic accuracy of 0.940 (p < 0.001) together with a low rate of negative laparotomies (11%, p < 0.01) and a significantly reduced number of diagnostic errors (from 71 to 21, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography enabled us to diagnose acute appendicitis in more patients more often and more quickly than clinical evaluation alone, suggesting that US may produce a better outcome. The revised clinical algorithm may be helpful in the study of US in patients with suspected acute appendicitis in prospective randomised controlled clinical trials.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has been used more frequently to diagnose acute appendicitis in children. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of CT has any influence on negative appendectomy or perforation rates. METHODS: Review of a prospective database of children having appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. Negative appendectomy and perforation rates were determined by correlation with final pathology reports. RESULTS: Eighty-five consecutive patients underwent appendectomy for the suspicion of acute appendicitis. The overall negative appendectomy rate was 17.6%, being 19.4% in females and 16.6% in males (p = 0.75). The overall accuracy, sensitivity and positive predictive value of CT were 75%, 91%, and 81%, respectively. Patients that had CT did not have a significantly lower rate of negative appendectomy (17.9% vs. 19.3%, p > 0.99) or perforation (26% vs. 17%; p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children does not change the negative appendectomy rate. Results of studies performed in adults may not be extrapolated to the evaluation of children with suspected acute appendicitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis.

PURPOSE: There is persistent controversy regarding the optimal surgical therapy for children with appendicitis. We have recently adopted laparoscopic appendectomy in lieu of the open technique for children with perforated appendicitis. We hypothesized that laparoscopic appendectomy would be as effective as open appendectomy in preventing postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of children admitted to our hospital over a 5-year period with the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the operative approach: laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy. Demographic data, duration of presenting symptoms, initial white blood cell (WBC) count, length of stay, and complications were abstracted. Data were compared using appropriate statistical analyses. RESULTS: There was no difference between the laparoscopic (n = 43) and open (n = 77) groups with respect to gender, duration of presenting symptoms, initial WBC, or length of stay. However, patients in the laparoscopic group had a significantly lower complication rate than those in the open group (6/43 vs. 23/77, P = 0.05). Infectious complications were no different between groups. Patients in the laparoscopic group tended to be older than patients in the open group (10.6 +/- 3.3 years vs. 8.5 +/- 4.1 years, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis has the same infectious complication rate and a lower overall complication rate than open appendectomy. A prospective study with standardized postoperative care would be needed to determine whether laparoscopic appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis is the treatment of choice, but until then it remains an attractive alternative.

Appendectomy↗
PubMed2004

Predictors of outcome for children with perforated appendicitis initially treated with non-operative management.

BACKGROUND: Initial non-operative therapy for children with perforated appendicitis has become increasingly popular with the advent of powerful broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, there is no consensus regarding which patients may be managed effectively with this strategy. We reviewed all children with perforated appendicitis who were treated initially with non-operative therapy to determine those characteristics that may predict a successful outcome. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of children admitted to our hospital between January 1, 2000 and May 1, 2003 with the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Only those who were treated initially with a single broad-spectrum antibiotic (piperacillin-tazobactam), with the intention of performing an interval appendectomy, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they were managed successfully with non-operative therapy: Responders and non-responders. Non-responders were defined as patients who either did not improve with antibiotic therapy or who required appendectomy prior to their electively scheduled time (six weeks). Demographic data, duration and type of presenting symptoms, initial white blood cell count (WBC), percent bands, percent neutrophils (PMNs), computed tomography (CT) interpretation, and interventions/operations were abstracted. Categorical data were compared using Chi-square analysis or the Fisher exact test; continuous variables were compared using the Student t-test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Overall, 26% (19/73) of patients treated initially non-operatively required appendectomy prior to the electively scheduled date. There was no difference between responders (n = 54) and non-responders (n = 19) with respect to age, gender, initial WBC, percent bands, percent PMNs, or duration and type of presenting symptoms. However, responders were more likely to have a phlegmon on CT scan compared to non-responders (11/54 vs. 0/19, p = 0.03). Non-responders were twice as likely to undergo drainage of an abscess by interventional radiology (10/19 vs. 13/54, p = 0.02) compared to responders. Among all patients who required percutaneous drainage, the failure rate of non-operative management was 43% (10/23). CONCLUSIONS: Children with perforated appendicitis can be managed effectively with nonoperative therapy, even in the presence of intra-abdominal abscesses. However, the need for abscess drainage increases the failure rate, perhaps due to inadequate source control. Those patients with a phlegmon on CT scan as opposed to an abscess, are most likely to respond to non-operative management. Initial non-operative therapy of perforated appendicitis in children is appropriate under certain clinical circumstances, especially when the body itself or interventional radiology can achieve adequate source control.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed1983

The assessment of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

A comparison of laboratory tests was undertaken in 106 patients admitted to the emergency room with the tentative diagnosis of acute appendicitis and who subsequently underwent appendectomy. The tests examined included the total white blood cell count, manual differential count, cytochemical differential count, and C-reactive protein. The sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and predictive value of these tests in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were calculated. The cytochemically determined neutrophil count, when greater than the upper limit of the reference interval of either 75% or 7.88 X 10(9)/L, and the total white blood count greater than the upper limit of the reference interval of 10.5 X 10(9)/L were the single best tests for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with the highest sensitivities of all tests examined (81-84%). The manual differential count and C-reactive protein showed significantly lower sensitivities. Test combinations also were examined. The combinations consisted of two or more tests joined by an "or" rule, i.e., if any one of the individually linked tests of the combination is above the reference interval, the combination is considered as indicating acute appendicitis. When either of the following test combinations were utilized--(1) total white count greater than 10.5 X 10(9)/L or cytochemical neutrophils greater than either 75% or 7.88 X 10(9)/L or CRP greater than 1.2 mg/dL; (2) total white count greater than 10.5 X 10(9)/L or manual bands greater than either 11% or 1.15 X 10(9)/L or CRP greater than 1.2 mg/dL--the sensitivity of the combination in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis approached 100% with a specificity in the range of 50%. We suggest that these test combinations may be useful in deciding which patients need further observation and reexamination prior to surgery. We also suggest the need for further studies to assess the usefulness of these tests in other types of acute inflammation and infection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Acute appendicitis complicating infectious mononucleosis: case report and review.

Acute appendicitis is an uncommon complication of infectious mononucleosis (IM) and can readily be misdiagnosed because of the acute abdominal pain with which patients with IM occasionally present. A case report is presented of a patient with IM who developed acute appendicitis during the acute phase of the illness. The appendicitis progressed to the formation of an abscess, which was evacuated at surgery. Histologic examination of the appendix showed absence of lymphoid follicles in the mucosal layer and intense lymphoid infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa by a mixed diffuse proliferation of lymphoid cells with groups of immunoblasts scattered among them. The lymphoid infiltrate was mainly composed of T lymphocytes; the anticomplementary immunofluorescent staining of the appendix for EBNA (Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen) was negative. Three cases of appendicitis complicating IM published in the literature are reviewed. All had clinical and histopathologic features similar to those of our patient and were cured after surgery. Our case report together with the literature review confirms that appendicitis in the acute phase of IM has distinct clinical and histopathologic features and thus has to be considered a true complication of IM rather than merely a simultaneous disease.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1992

A microbiological comparison between acute and complicated appendicitis.

Bacteria recovered from appendiceal specimens from 20 patients with acute appendicitis were compared with those recovered from 19 patients with complicated (gangrenous or perforative) appendicitis. Specimens of both peritoneal fluid and appendiceal tissue from patients with acute appendicitis yielded smaller numbers and fewer species of bacteria in culture than did specimens from patients with more complicated disease (2.3 strains per specimen for the former; 9.9 strains per specimen for the latter). Bacteria were recovered from all 13 cultures of specimens of appendiceal tissue and from 13 of 18 cultures of specimens of peritoneal fluid obtained from patients with gangrenous and perforative appendicitis; however, only eight of 17 cultures of appendiceal specimens and seven of 18 cultures of peritoneal fluid specimens from patients with acute appendicitis yielded bacteria. These findings suggest that some bacteria traverse the intact appendiceal wall prior to perforation and that progressive infection and subsequent tissue damage and necrosis allow larger numbers and varieties of bacteria to move through appendiceal wall tissue and into the peritoneal cavity.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

Clusters of acute appendicitis: further evidence for an infectious aetiology.

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of appendicitis, the commonest cause of acute abdomen, is unknown. Infection has been proposed but the evidence has been unconvincing. The purpose of the present study was to investigate if temporo-spatial clustering and outbreaks, characteristics of infectious diseases, could be found in appendicitis cases in a defined Swedish population. METHODS: Temporo-spatial clustering among 1155 cases from three districts of Jönköping County in 1984-1990 was identified by Knox space-time cluster analysis. Outbreaks were identified by retrospective study of temporal variations in 3590 consecutive cases of acute appendicitis from the city of Jönköping in 1969-1990. RESULTS: Space-time clustering was found among patients with operations less than 60 days apart (observed/expected [O/E]-ratio 1.46, P = 0.016). Subset analysis revealed clustering to be commonest among patients from the same households (O/E-ratio 6.52, P = 0.012), among patients younger than 15 years (O/E-ratio 3.61, P = 0.004) and among females (O/E-ratio 2.28, P = 0.004). Three outbreaks with a significantly increased number of cases were observed during the 22-year study period (O/E-ratio 1.6-2.2, P = 0.001-0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The finding of temporo-spatial interaction and outbreaks among appendicitis cases supports the concept that appendicitis may be caused by infectious agents.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The aetiology and pathogenesis of appendicitis remains unknown. A relation with female sex hormones has been proposed because of a lower incidence among women and incidence variations during the menstrual cycle, but studies have given inconsistent results. Pregnancy constitutes a period of dramatic increases in levels of female sex hormones, but the incidence of appendicitis during childbearing is not known. METHODS: Case-control study of pregnancy status at the time of appendectomy of 53 058 women and of 53 058 population-based age-matched controls. Cases and controls were identified by linkage of the Swedish Inpatient Register and the nation-wide census. Pregnancy status at the time of operation was obtained by linkage with the Swedish Fertility Register. Differences in pregnancy status were analysed using conditional logistic regression and expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Fewer patients than expected with appendicitis were pregnant compared with the controls, especially in the third trimester (OR = 0.49, 95% CI : 0.30-0.79 for perforated and OR = 0.33, 95% CI : 0.28-0.39 for non-perforated appendicitis). CONCLUSIONS: The reduced incidence of appendicitis suggests a protective effect of pregnancy, especially in the third trimester.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The role of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in granulomatous appendicitis: a histologic and molecular study.

Granulomatous appendicitis is an enigmatic entity. Purported causes include Crohn's disease, foreign body reactions, sarcoidosis, and infectious agents; however, most cases remain idiopathic. Yersinia enterocolitica (YE) and Y. pseudotuberculosis (YP) have been implicated as causes of appendicitis, ileocolitis, and mesenteric adenitis. The authors examined the potential role of YE and YP in granulomatous appendicitis using histologic and molecular methods. Forty cases of granulomatous appendicitis were evaluated for histologic features including transmural inflammation, number and character of granulomas, and mucosal changes. Twort Gram, Grocott methenamine-silver (GMS), and Ziehl-Neelsen stains were evaluated, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was performed to identify pathogenic YP and YE. Twenty-five percent (10 of 40) of the cases were positive for pathogenic Yersinia by PCR (four YE, four YP, and two with both species). Prominent histologic features included epithelioid granulomas with lymphoid cuffing, transmural inflammation with lymphoid aggregates, mucosal ulceration, and cryptitis. One Yersinia-positive case contained mural Gram-negative bacilli; fungal and acid-fast bacilli stains were all negative. Except for one culture-negative case, serologies and cultures were not done or results were unavailable. Two Yersinia-positive patients were diagnosed subsequently with Crohn's disease, suggesting a possible relationship between the two entities. No other patients developed significant sequelae. YE and YP are important causes of granulomatous appendicitis, and Yersinia infection may mimic Crohn's disease. No histologic features distinguish reliably between Yersinia species, or between Yersinia-positive and Yersinia-negative cases. Because special stains and cultures are often not diagnostic, PCR analysis is an excellent technique for the diagnosis of Yersinia.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Patient gender-related performance of nonfocused helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of patient gender on the performance of helical computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2000, 650 consecutive nonfocused helical abdominal CT scans were performed in adult patients presenting with acute lower abdominal pain. In general, most patients received both intravenous and oral contrast with 5-mm scan collimation through the lower abdomen and pelvis; details regarding technique and overall accuracy have been published previously. We subanalyzed results with respect to patient gender-related differences, especially in false-positive and false-negative cases. A chi2 analysis was performed to determine if significant gender-related differences were present in major or minor CT diagnostic criteria for acute appendicitis, extra-appendiceal findings, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: Of the 650 patients, 552 had adequate clinical follow-up. The sensitivity for diagnosing acute appendicitis was 100% (65/65) in men and 93.6% (74/79) in women (P < 0.05); specificity was 96.2% (130/135) in men and 98.9% (272/275) in women (P > 0.05); and accuracy was 97.5% (193/198) in men and 97.6% in women (346/354) (P > 0.05). A thickened appendix and periappendiceal stranding were seen in 92.1% of men and 84.5% of women (P = 0.15) All 5 false-negative results were in thin women. In patients without acute appendicitis, CT was able to provide a relevant alternative diagnosis in 183 of 272 women (67.3%) and 81 of 130 men (62.3%) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Nonfocused helical CT was highly accurate for diagnosing acute appendicitis in both men and women, although there was a slight but significant decrease in sensitivity in thin women.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1995

Failure of technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime leukocyte scintigraphy in the evaluation of children with suspected appendicitis.

To determine the accuracy and reliability of a labeled leukocyte imaging technique in the early diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis, we prospectively studied patients presenting to the pediatric emergency department with abdominal pain suggestive of appendicitis. Patients scheduled for urgent laparotomy were excluded, as were postmenarchal females. Blinded interpretations by two independent radiologists were compared with surgical findings, if managed operatively, or with discharge diagnoses and three week follow-up, if managed medically. Twenty-three children underwent technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (HMPAO) leukocyte scintigraphy. Seven had pathologically proven appendicitis, with false negative interpretations made in three and five cases by the two radiologists. Sixteen patients had prompt resolution of symptoms; however, scintigraphic abnormalities were identified in 10 and seven cases by the two radiologists. Resulting sensitivity, depending on the individual reader, ranged from 29 to 57%, with specificity 38 to 56%, positive predictive value 22 to 29%, negative predictive value 64 to 67%, and accuracy 43 to 48%. Interrater reliability for agreement on the scintigraphic diagnosis of appendicitis was poor (kappa = 0.38). Technetium-99m HMPAO leukocyte scintigraphy was neither accurate nor reliable as a diagnostic tool in a subgroup of pediatric patients with an initial clinical presentation equivocal for appendicitis. This finding contradicts previously published experience using similar scintigraphic techniques.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2001

Pediatric appendicitis in "real-time": the value of sonography in diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of sonography in the diagnosis of clinically equivocal appendicitis, and to identify the factors leading to an inaccurate ultrasound diagnosis. The impact of sonographic findings on clinical management and outcome of children with appendicitis is examined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 317 children who attended the emergency department (ED) of a children's hospital for acute abdominal pain for which acute appendicitis was the main differential diagnosis. They had ultrasound because the diagnosis was uncertain clinically. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of ultrasound for appendicitis was 0.92, and the negative predictive value was 0.88. The sensitivity and specificity could not be determined because there were 43 patients with equivocal ultrasound results. The pitfalls hindering the accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis included a high incidence of perforated appendicitis at presentation, the retrocecal appendix, and other technical factors such as abdominal guarding, excessive bowel gas, obesity, inadequate bladder filling, and the uncooperative patient. When ultrasound findings were combined with clinical judgment in clinical management, there were only five cases of non-therapeutic laparotomy and eight cases of delayed surgery due to missed diagnosis in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is a useful for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in children. However, in the setting of a pediatric hospital ED, the accuracy of ultrasound and its ability to improve early hospital triage may be reduced. Repeated clinical review is still essential and in selected cases, appendiceal CT scan may be required to guide therapeutic decision making.

Abdomen, Acute↗