Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “AFTERIMAGE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Visual aftereffects of sequential perception: dynamic adaptation to changes in texture density and contrast.

Two new aftereffects are described in which the comparison of successively presented textures can be affected by prior exposure (adaptation) to biased sequences. A dynamic aftereffect of texture density can be produced using changes in non-Fourier texture density (using balanced-dot textures). An analogous dynamic aftereffect is demonstrated for texture contrast. These two effects are dissociated experimentally by the near absence of cross-adaptation. Evidence is also presented that the density effect is not one of texture motion (e.g. expansion/contraction of texture).

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

Texture contrast aftereffects are monocular; texture density aftereffects are binocular.

Two experiments examined interocular transfer for simple and dynamic aftereffects of density and contrast. Simple aftereffects of texture contrast were shown to be primarily monocular. Texture density aftereffects were shown to be primarily binocular. Similarly, dynamic aftereffects to repeated changes in contrast were found to be completely monocular; those to repeated changes in density were found to be entirely binocular. Since contrast and density aftereffects differ in their sensitivity to eye-of-origin, they likely depend on different neural loci, and are not manifestations of the same underlying adaptation. Consistent with this conclusion, it is proposed that, whereas contrast normalization (and perhaps contrast aftereffects) may be localized to simple cells in V1, density coding and normalization require computations only available in complex cells and beyond.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

Spatial aspects of object formation revealed by a new illusion, shine-through.

When a vernier stimulus is presented for a short time and followed by a grating comprising five straight lines, the vernier remains invisible but may bequeath its offset to the grating (feature inheritance). For more than seven grating elements, the vernier is rendered visible as a shine-through element. However, shine-through depends strongly on the spatio-temporal layout of the grating. Here, we show that spatially inhomogeneous gratings diminish shine-through and vernier discrimination. Even subtle deviations, in the range of a few minutes of arc, matter. However, longer presentation times of the vernier regenerate shine-through. Feature inheritance and shine-through may become a useful tool in investigating such different topics as time course of information processing, feature binding, attention, and masking.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Shine-through: temporal aspects.

If a vernier stimulus precedes a grating for a very short time, the vernier either remains invisible, but may bequeath some of its properties to the grating (feature inheritance), or might shine through keeping its features - depending on the number of grating elements [Herzog, M. H. & Koch, C., 2001. Seeing properties of an invisible element: feature inheritance and shine-through. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 98, 4271-4275]. Feature inheritance and shine-through represent two different states of feature binding [Herzog, M. H., Koch, C., & Fahle, M., Switching binding states. Visual Cognition (in press)], whereas shine-through depends in subtle ways on the spatial layout of the grating [Herzog, M. H., Fahle, M., & Koch, C., (2001). Spatial aspects of object formation revealed by a new illusion, shine-through Vision Research]. Here, we show that also temporal parameters of the grating influence shine-through. For example, a delayed presentation of certain grating elements can deteriorate performance dramatically.

Afterimage↗
PubMed2001

3D after-effects are due to shape and not disparity adaptation.

There are a variety of stereoscopic after-effects in which exposure to a stimulus with a particular slant or curvature affects the perceived slant or curvature of a subsequently presented stimulus. These after-effects have been explained as a consequence of fatigue (a decrease in responsiveness) among neural mechanisms that are tuned to particular disparities or patterns of disparity. In fact, a given disparity pattern is consistent with numerous slants or curvatures; to determine slant or curvature, the visual system must take the viewing distance into account. We took advantage of this property to examine whether the mechanisms underlying the stereoscopic curvature after-effect are tuned to particular disparity patterns or to some other property such as surface curvature. The results clearly support the second hypothesis. Thus, 3D after-effects appear to be caused by adaptation among mechanisms specifying surface shape rather than among mechanisms signaling the disparity pattern.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect.

Recently, Webster and MacLin demonstrated a face-distortion after-effect (FDAE) for both upright and inverted faces: adaptation to a distorted face makes a normal face appear distorted in the direction opposite to the adapting direction. Neurophysiological studies (e.g. Experimental Brain Research 65 (1986) 38) show that face-selective neurons in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) are remarkably size-invariant in their responses. If the site of adaptation underlying the FDAE is the homologous neuron population in human vision, then the FDAE should also be highly tolerant to changes in size between adapting and test faces. Here, we test this prediction. Observers were adapted to distorted upright/inverted faces of three different sizes (3.3 degrees x 3.7 degrees, 6.6 degrees x 7.5 degrees, and 13.1 degrees x 14.8 degrees ). For adapting faces of all three sizes, observers adjusted test faces of all three sizes until they appeared normal. Significant FDAEs were observed in all conditions. For both upright and inverted faces, FDAEs were approximately twice as strong when adapting and test faces were the same size than when they differed by even a single octave in size. The magnitudes of FDAEs were comparable for upright and inverted faces. The larger FDAEs for same-size adapting and test faces suggest that part of the FDAE derives from a neuron population with narrow size-tuning. However, the significant FDAEs obtained for adapting and test images differing by two octaves implicate a different neuron population with broad size-tuning, possibly the human homolog of the face-selective neuron population in monkey STS.

Afterimage↗
PubMed2002

Masking, persistence, and transfer in rotating arcs.

We demonstrate that the apparent length of a thin white arc on a black disk, rotating concentrically at 2.5 rps, varies with angular length and exposure duration. While short arcs (9-18 degrees ) gradually expand, long arcs (36-72 degrees ) first undergo a brief contraction, before they also expand. On average, perceived elongation asymptotes after 15 s equivalent to visual persistencies ranging from 68 to 170 ms. Using bi- and tri-colored arcs, we find that the apparent increase in length derives from the rear end of the rotating stimulus, while the initial shrinkage derives from contraction of the middle. After 15 s of adaptation, perceived length of the arc decays to actual stimulus length within an average of 6 s and, upon re-exposure of the arc, reaches its former value after only 5 s (priming). When the rotating arc is presented first to one eye and then to the other, apparent elongation transfers partially (46%), suggesting a contribution by the binocular cells in the visual cortex. A partial transfer (26%) also occurs from clockwise to counterclockwise rotation. When tested interocularly, the directional transfer is more pronounced (47%) and equals the interocular transfer under equidirectional conditions, suggesting that the directional transfer (cw versus ccw) might derive from non-directional cortical units. Whereas the initial contraction may be attributable to backward masking, the observed elongation likely reflects a cumulative build-up of after-discharge in cortical neurons over time.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Timing of contextual modulation in the shine-through effect.

Contextual elements can fundamentally change the perception of an embedded target. A recently discovered masking effect, shine-through, allows one to investigate the precise dynamics of contextual modulation of the human visual system. In this shine-through effect, a vernier precedes a grating comprising more than seven elements for display times as short as 10 ms. The vernier appears as a "shine-through" element superimposed on the grating. However, if additional single lines are presented above and below the grating, visibility of the shine-through element dramatically diminishes. Recent publications focused mainly on the spatial aspects of this contextual modulation. Here, we investigate its temporal characteristics. We show that contextual suppression can occur for context durations of 5-10 ms, even if contextual elements appear 100 ms before target onset. This contextual suppression is not due to the presentation of the contextual elements themselves since without the grating contextual elements exert only weak masking power. Only the combination of contextual elements and grating causes the contextual suppression.

Afterimage↗
PubMed2003

Extending the shine-through effect to classical masking paradigms.

A vernier, presented for a short time, shines through a following grating if the grating contains nine and more elements but remains largely invisible for smaller gratings. Therefore, extended grating masks yield, surprisingly, less masking than smaller ones. Here, we show that this mask size effect is not unique to grating masks. Masking diminishes if the size of classical pattern-, noise-, light-, and metacontrast masks increases and if these masks are regular, i.e. highly ordered.

Afterimage↗
PubMed2003

Effects of stimulus size and luminance on oscillopsia in congenital nystagmus.

Although the absence of oscillopsia is a common feature of congenital nystagmus (CN), it is occasionally noted by patients under poor viewing conditions and has been provoked in laboratory settings with stabilised images. In the present study, the effects of reductions in background stimulus size and luminance on perceptual stability in CN were examined. Sixteen CN subjects were first interviewed using a structured questionnaire about whether they ever experienced oscillopsia and, if so, under what circumstances and with what perceptions. They next fixated an LED centred in projected images of three sizes (21x14 degrees, 10x6 degrees and 7x4 degrees) and four luminance levels (115.5, 24.5, 2.7 and 0.1 cd/m2, with contrasts from 96 down to 20%). Eye movements were recorded with a limbal tracker. They were asked after viewing each image "whether anything happened to the image while they watched it." Occasional oscillopsia was reported by 12/16 of the CN subjects on the questionnaire. In the laboratory, 13/16 subjects experienced oscillopsia in some manner for at least one of the stimuli. 8/13 CN subjects experienced it for the dimmest and smallest slides. 11/13 perceived certain parts (either the LED or background) of the visual stimuli as moving, with the perception of LED movement most pronounced at low background luminance. Foveation did not differ when trials with and without reported oscillopsia were compared (independent samples t-test, p>0.05). Oscillopsia may occur in CN with normal viewing of bright fixation targets against dim backgrounds. Under these conditions, the oscillopsia may be spatially inhomogeneous. Luminance differences between the fixation point and surround may have caused transmission time differences as the image moved across the retina, therefore leading to the perception of motion in one portion of the scene and not the other.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

A reduced motion aftereffect in strabismic amblyopia.

The motion aftereffect was measured using both static and dynamic test stimuli in a group of normal observers and a group of strabismic amblyopes. Amblyopes exhibited a reduced direct aftereffect for both static and dynamic stimuli and only two of the eight amblyopes exhibited any measurable interocular transfer for either test stimulus. It is hard to explain these results in terms of either the known spatial (contrast sensitivity and positional sensitivity) or motion deficits previously reported in amblyopia. These results suggest a primary motion deficit in amblyopia affecting both the static and dynamic motion aftereffects.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1997

Linking lower and higher stages of motion processing?

The spatial frequency selectivity of motion detection mechanisms can be measured by comparing the magnitude of motion aftereffects (MAEs) as a function of the spatial frequency of the adapting and test gratings. For static test gratings, narrow spatial frequency tuning has been reported in a number of studies. However, for dynamic test patterns, reports have been conflicting. Ashida & Osaka [(1994). Perception, 23, 1313-1320] found no tuning whereas Bex et al. [(1996) Vision Research, 36, 2721-2727] reported a narrow tuning. The main difference between the two studies was the temporal frequency of the test pattern. In this study we measured the spatial frequency tuning of the MAE using test patterns for a range of temporal frequencies. The results confirmed that there was narrow spatial frequency tuning when the test pattern was counterphasing at a low temporal frequency. However, the spatial frequency selectivity broadened as the temporal frequency of the test pattern was increased.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1997

The influence of adaptation on perceived visual location.

We demonstrate a marked effect of prior adaptation upon the perceived position of subsequently presented stimuli using both first-order (luminance-defined) and second-order (texture-defined) stimuli. The effect of varying the contrast of the adapting and test stimuli depends only upon the ratio of adapting/test contrast. Adaptation effects for the two types of stimuli differ in terms of interocular transfer and rate of decay. Whilst adapting and testing with the same type of stimulus (first- or second-order) produces large shifts in perceived position, little or no crossover effect was found. The data are accounted for by a model in which the centroid of the linear combination of after-image and test stimulus is extracted.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1998

Visual motion aftereffects: differential adaptation and test stimulation.

The local motion adaptation at the basis of the motion aftereffect (MAE) can be expressed in a variety of ways, depending upon the structure of the test display [Wade et al. (1996). Vision Research, 36, 2167-2175]. Three experiments are reported, which examined the characteristics of the test display and of the local adaptation process. In Experiment 1, MAEs were recorded in the central of three test gratings but their directions depended on the location of the centre relative to the adapting gratings. The effects of adapting motions in different directions were examined in Experiments 2 and 3, in which one or two adapting gratings were presented above or above and below a fixation cross. The upper grating always received the same (leftward) direction of motion during adaptation, and the lower grating was: moving in the opposite direction, stationary, moving in the same direction, or absent. The results indicate that no MAE is visible in the upper grating when a single test grating is observed experiment 2) and only occurs with two test gratings following differential adaptation between the upper and lower gratings (Experiment 3). Thus, the MAE occurs as a consequence of adapting restricted retinal regions to motion but it can only be expressed when differentially adapted regions are also tested.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1998

Differences in the luminance of the first and second displays affects visible persistence in opposite ways.

Visible persistence was measured using a two-frame temporal integration paradigm. Most such studies match the brightness of the two frames, and find that equal increases in the brightness of the frames impairs performance on the task. This suggests that increases in frame brightness decrease the duration of visible persistence. Little is known about what happens when the frames differ in brightness. In this study, the luminance intensities of the first and second frames were set at five different intensity levels in a factorial arrangement. Increasing the intensity of the first frame improved performance, whereas increasing the intensity of the second frame impaired performance. These results suggest, contrary to the findings with brightness-matched frames, that increasing the intensity of one frame increases the duration of visible persistence of that frame. A mathematical model supports this conclusion.

Afterimage↗
PubMed1998

A rotational stereoscopic 3-dimensional movement aftereffect.

A stereoscopic rotational movement aftereffect (MAE) and a stereoscopic bi-directional MAE were generated by rotation of a cyclopean random dot cylinder in depth and by movement of two cyclopean random dot planes in opposite directions, respectively. Cross-adaptational MAEs were also generated on each other, but not with stimuli lacking any disparity. Cross-adaptation MAEs were generated between stereoscopic and non-stereoscopic random dot stimuli moving in the one X/Y plane. Spontaneous reversals in direction of movement were observed with bistable stimuli lacking disparity. Two models of the middle temporal area were considered which might explain both the stereoscopic MAEs and the spontaneous reversals.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1998

Directions of motion after-effects induced by gratings and plaids.

In three experiments the direction of motion after-effect (MAE) is measured following adaptation to two gratings moving in different directions presented in alternation (component-induced MAEs: CMAEs), and to moving plaid patterns composed of superimposed pairs of these gratings (plaid-induced MAEs; PMAEs). These MAEs are compared to: (i) the vector sum direction of the component gratings; (ii) the IOC-predicted direction of the plaids; and (iii) the perceived direction of the plaids as reported by observers. Contrary to previous findings (Burke D, Wenderoth P. Vis Res 1993;33:351-9), directions of PMAEs are shown to approximate the vector sum direction of the components, whereas directions of CMAEs are shown to approximate the mean (unweighted) direction of the components. This difference is attributed to the activity, and adaptation, of an additional population of neurones whose stimulus), or a counterphase moving plaid (a combined Fourier and non-Fourier stimulus), rules out the possibility that the discrepancy between PMAE direction and actual plaid direction is due to the use of test stimuli that do not adequately reflect adaptation by the Fourier and non-Fourier components of the adapting plaids (HR, Ferrera VP, Yo C. Vis Neurosci 1992;9:79-97). Various explanations of this paradoxical result are discussed, including: (i) that MAEs produced by Fourier components out-weigh (and possibly even mask) MAEs produced by non-Fourier plaid components; (ii) PMAEs are influenced by adaptation of a population of component-selective neurones that do not contribute to plaid perception; and, (iii) PMAEs are influenced by component-specific adaptation effects that are weighted according to relative component sensitivity, rather than relative component speed (Pantle A. Vis Res 14;1974:1229-36). We review psychophysical and neurophysiological evidence consistent with these explanations.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1998

Motion after-effects and word contingency.

Stimulus-selectivity in phenomena such as the McCollough effect and other contingent after effects are controversial. Word specific McCollough effects have been reported (Allan et al., Percept Psychophys 1989;45:104-113) that suggest an associative model rather then a neural one. However, failures to replicate make this finding controversial (Humphrey et al., J Exp Psychol: Gen 123:86-90). We applied the same contingency to the motion after-effect. Moving words, words paired with sine wave gratings and words composed of sine wave gratings failed to generate text contingent after-effects in stimulus situations that normally evoke motion after-effects. Thus, there was little evidence that motion adaptation can be made textually contingent.

Adaptation, Ocular↗