Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “practice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

[Effectiveness and efficiency of ambulatory diabetes education programs. A comparison of specialty practice and general practice].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The increasing incidence of NIDDM requires adequate proof of the effectiveness and efficiency of out-patient programmes for diabetics. This study aimed at examining which of the two methods may promise the better results under controlled expenses--modifications of the present standardized diabetes education program in the general practice or specifically developed diabetes education programme in specialist diabetes practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 75 diabetics took part in the different out-patient diabetes education programmes at one special practice for diabetology or one of seven general practitioner practices, respectively. The self-developed intensive diabetes education programme of the special practice led by two specialists in diabetology and a dietician was compared with the diabetes education programme of the general practices performed by a doctor's assistant. 38 diabetics in eight training groups at the specialist for diabetology and 37 patients in seven training groups at the general practices were instructed. 32 patients in total (18 patients at the specialist practice and 14 patients at the general practices) additionally received an evaluated support programme which addressed psychosocial impediments related to the topics of a structured diabetes therapy. All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire before, right after, 3 and 6 months after the programme. Weight and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured before, 3 and 6 months after the programme. RESULTS: The mean weight and glycosylated hemoglobin of all groups decreased as expected. However, the patients of the general practices achieved more lasting reduction of these objective parameters. All patients stated impairments of their quality of life, but the patients of the specialist practice felt more impaired. The motivational support programme achieved only few positive results. CONCLUSION: The standardized diabetes education programme of the general practices and the more intensive and expensive diabetes education programme achieved equally valuable results. Regarding time and expenses, the standardized diabetes education programme may be the more efficient method of NIDDM out-patient education.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Practice-based preceptoral residency training in family practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Highly specific accreditation requirements have led to a uniform approach in US family practice continuity training. In this paper, we describe an experiment in practice-based preceptoral continuity training. METHODS: We assessed the impact of assigning a resident to a private faculty practice for the second- and third-year levels of family practice continuity training. Data analysis included comparisons of practice demographics, clinical content, training costs, and resident assessment of training quality. RESULTS: The preceptoral resident practice better approximated community demographic patterns than did the established residency practice. However, the preceptoral resident practice had relatively fewer visits for hypertension and diabetes mellitus than did the established residency, preceptoral site faculty, and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey practices. Resident training at the preceptoral site resulted in a positive training expense differential of $69,300 calculated on an annual per third-year resident basis. The preceptoral resident expressed high levels of satisfaction with the quality of family practice center training. CONCLUSIONS: Practice-based preceptoral continuity training in family practice appears feasible in terms of clinical content exposure and may offer substantial financial advantages. Important questions remain, particularly about the quality of teaching and supervision in a preceptoral training model.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1997

Defining the practice population in fee-for-service practice.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a technique for defining a practice population of discrete individuals based on multiyear family practice fee-for-service billings data. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Nineteen family physicians in Ontario, Canada who converted from fee-for-service to capitation payment. Data sources were fee-for-service billings data for the three-year period prior to the conversion from fee-for-service to capitation payment and the rosters of enrolled patients for the first and third years after the change to capitation payment. STUDY DESIGN: The billings-based definition of the physician's practice population was compared against the Year 1 roster. We also compared the billings-based practice population and the Year 1 roster to the physician's Year 3 roster to identify patients who might have been missed during the roster development process. Our principal analyses were an assessment of the sensitivity of the billings-based definition of the practice population (EPP), the positive predictive value of EPP, and the agreement between EPP and the rostered patient population (RPP). We also examined the ratio between EPP and RPP to determine EPP's accuracy in estimating the practice denominator. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The practice population for each physician at the time of conversion from fee-for-service to capitation payment was defined as (a) all persons for whom the physician billed the provincial health insurance plan for at least one visit during the year immediately prior to joining the capitation-funded program; and (b) all additional patients for whom the physician billed the plan for at least one service in each of the two preceding years. Data extraction was carried out within the Ministry of Health in order to preserve the anonymity of patients and physicians. Data were provided to the investigators stripped of patient and physician identifiers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The mean sensitivity and positive predictive value of EPP were 95.3 percent and 87.4 percent, respectively. The level of agreement between EPP and RPP averaged 84.4 percent. The mean ratio of EPP to RPP was 1.21 (95 percent C.I. 1.030-1.213). Correction for roster false-negatives increased the sensitivity, positive predictive value, and agreement between EPP and the practice population, and reduced the mean ratio of EPP to the practice population to 1.068 (95 percent C.I. 1.010-1.127). CONCLUSIONS: The practice population can usefully be defined in fee-for-service family practice on the basis of multiyear fee-for-service billings data. Further research examining alternative encounter-based practice population definitions would be valuable.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1975

The orginization of medical practice and practice orientations among physicians in prepaid and nonprepaid primary care settings.

Data are presented on office-based general practitioners and pediatricians working in varying practice settings. Fee-for-service physicians spend more time in direct patient care activities than those in prepaid practice, and devote more time to each patient. The data suggest that the patient load characteristic of general practice in prepaid groups encourages a more assembly line practice which is less responsive to patients than the pattern characteristic of fee-for-service practice. Prepaid physicians work during scheduled hours and may deal with increased load by processing patients more rapidly. Fee-for-service physicians tend to respond to increased demand by working longer hours. The responsiveness of primary care physicians to patient problems seems to reflect primarily their social orientations to medical practice and the time pressures they face. Varying practice settings result in different techniques of coping with the pressures of practice. Data are also presented on sociodemographic and professional characteristics of primary care physicians in varying settings, workload, use of diagnostic and laboratory procedures, social orientations to medical practice, satisfactions and dissatisfactions, and attitudes toward sociopolitical aspects of medical care. Suggestions are offered for improving the responsiveness of prepaid practice.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

From good medical practice to best medical practice.

Medical and other professionals know what good practice is. It is in accordance with ideal procedures and standards of one's own practice. As actors we assess our practices from inside. If questions of quality assessment or quality assurance are raised at all, they are to be raised and answered by the professionals themselves. From that internal perspective, the idea of better or best medical practice is rejected as superfluous; or, perhaps, even nonsensical. This article suggests that concepts of best medical practice, as expressed from outside the profession e.g. economic efficiency, are not adequate in themselves if our interest lies in changing existing practice. Defined from outside, such concepts would be alien to the medical profession. Going from good practice to best practice, the article proposes, can be done on the basis of expanding the metaphor of self-transcendence. In self-transcendence the individual or profession changes or develops strategies and activities by adopting the standpoint of some perspective outside its own practice, and then integrating this perspective into practice. Self-transcendence by the medical profession can be carried out by their integrating a moral ideal from normal life into professional practice-essentially the notion of prescribing support of the weak. Such integration implies, inter alia, that the profession must take account of the scarcity of resources when assessing their practice.

Clinical Medicine↗
PubMed1994

Beyond reflection: practical wisdom and the practical syllogism.

The relationship between the way nurses think and the actions they perform is one of the key debates within the nursing profession. It has been assumed that the thinking that precedes and follows nursing actions has been described within the reflective practitioner doctrine. It is suggested that this is not so, as the reflective doctrine has not only failed to explicate the link between theory and practice but some reflective theorists have perpetuated the theory-practice gap by separating thought and action. Instead it is argued that Aristotle's conceptions of Practical Wisdom and the Practical Syllogism provide a framework in which the link between thinking and doing are described. Practical wisdom is a form of knowledge that can be claimed by those who purport to deal with human good. Unlike theoretical knowledge, practical wisdom ends not in an intellectual conclusion but in the actual performing of some action designed to produce good for fellow humans. These actions are taken only after the practically wise person decides, consciously or unconsciously, the most effective and morally right option. The practical syllogism is that particular feature of critical thinking that links theory and practice in practice professions. The practical syllogism describes the means-end considerations that underpin all actions undertaken by nurses. It is not suggested that all the deliberations of those with practical wisdom is syllogistic in nature but that this is a central feature of the way in which nurses approach the care they deliver.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Advanced practice nursing role delineation in acute and critical care: application of the strong model of advanced practice.

PURPOSE: This purpose of this study was to differentiate between the roles of clinical nurse specialists and acute care nurse practitioners. BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE: Hypothesized blending of the clinical nurse specialist and acute care nurse practitioner roles is thought to result in an acute care clinician who integrates the clinical skills of the nurse practitioner with the systems knowledge, educational commitment, and leadership ability of the clinical nurse specialist. Ideally, this role blending would facilitate excellence in both direct and indirect patient care. The Strong Model of Advanced Practice, which incorporates practice domains of direct comprehensive care, support of systems, education, research, and publication and professional leadership, was tested to search for practical evidence of role blending. METHODS: This descriptive, exploratory, pilot study included subjects (N = 18) solicited from an academic medical center and from an Internet advanced practice listserv. Questionnaires included self-ranking of expertise in practice domains, as well as valuing of role-related tasks. Content validity was judged by an expert panel of advanced practice nurses. RESULTS: Analyses of descriptive statistics revealed that clinical nurse specialists, who had more experience both as registered nurses and in the advanced practice nurse role, self-ranked their expertise higher in all practice domains. Acute care nurse practitioners placed higher importance on tasks related to direct comprehensive care, including conducting histories and physicals, diagnosing, and performing diagnostic procedures, whereas clinical nurse specialists assigned greater importance to tasks related to education, research, and leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of self-assessed clinical expertise as well as valuing of role-related tasks differed among this sample of clinical nurse specialists and acute care nurse practitioners. Groundwork has been laid for continuing exploration into differentiation in advanced practice nursing roles. IMPLICATIONS: As the clinical nurse specialist role changes and the acute care nurse practitioner role emerges, it is imperative that advanced practice nurses describe their contribution to health care. Associating advanced practice nursing activities with outcomes will help further characterize these 2 advanced practice roles.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Faculty practice: what do the data show? Findings from the NONPF Faculty Practice Survey. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties.

UNLABELLED: This article reports on the findings of the NONPF (National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties) Faculty Practice Survey regarding promotion and tenure. Relevant issues related to tenure for practicing faculty are identified and discussed. Faculty practice has become an increasingly important and complex issue for academic institutions in relation to promotion and tenure. The purpose of this article is to examine the role and patterns of practice among tenured and nontenured faculty in academic nursing institutions and the variables associated with faculty promotion and tenure in these institutions. METHOD: A survey was mailed to the membership of the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties to examine the differences between practicing faculty who were tenured and those who were nontenured and to identify predictors of tenure. A 50% response rate (N = 452) was obtained. Findings indicate that only 37% of the practicing faculty were tenured, and more than half (51%) reported that practice was not considered in promotion and tenure decisions at their institutions. The predictors of tenure included practice being considered in promotion and tenure and support for practice at the school of nursing level. Data on reasons faculty practice are also presented. Recommendations for including practice in promotion and tenure guidelines are discussed as well as the ramifications of administrative support for practice.

Career Mobility↗
PubMed2002

Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules.

The effects of practice schedule and amount of practice on the development of the generalized motor program (GMP) and on parameter estimation were investigated. Participants (N = 108) practiced the same relative timing but different absolute durations of a multisegment timing task. Practice schedules (constant, blocked, or serial) were crossed with amounts of practice (low and high). Inclusion of a constant practice condition allowed the authors to investigate the variability of practice prediction. Participants practiced the same proportional durations in a serial or a blocked schedule, which enabled the authors to examine contextual interference. A constant practice schedule enhanced GMP performance when task parameters remained the same, but varied practice schedules were beneficial when task parameters changed. A serial as opposed to a blocked practice schedule was superior when the performance of a task governed by a different GMP was required. Increased practice led to a consolidated task representation that was unavailable for updating.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Progress of pharmacist collaborative practice: status of state laws and regulations and perceived impact of collaborative practice.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the current status and features of states' laws on pharmacist collaborative practice, barriers and facilitators to the passage of such laws, pharmacists' satisfaction with present regulations, and pharmacy leaders' perceptions regarding the impact of collaborative practice on pharmacist-physician relationships and on patients' perceptions of pharmacists. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Executives of state pharmacy organizations and officers of state pharmacy boards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence and features of collaborative practice law, perceptions regarding effects of collaborative practice on pharmacist-physician relationships, and patients' perceptions of pharmacists. RESULTS: Of 48 states responding to the survey, 32 (66%) had existing pharmacist collaborative practice laws; 23 states (48%) allowed pharmacists to initiate and modify therapy, whereas 9 (19%) allowed only modification of therapy. Dependent collaborative practice was permitted in 31 states (65%). Most state laws applied to hospital, long-term care, and community settings. Five of the 32 states with pharmacist collaborative practice laws had made changes to broaden the provisions since the original laws were enacted. Nine states out of 16 that did not have collaborative practice laws indicated plans to pursue passage of such laws. Overall, collaborative practice was viewed as having a positive effect on pharmacist-physician relationships and a slightly positive effect on patients' perceptions of pharmacists. Respondents believed that pharmacists currently involved in collaborative practice were mostly satisfied with present laws, although some respondents mentioned the need for further revisions to the laws. CONCLUSION: Significant progress has been made in passing and implementing laws on pharmacist collaborative practice. As positive experience is gained, good opportunities exist to broaden current laws and increase pharmacists' involvement in collaborative practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2001

Practice autonomy among primary care physician assistants: the predictive abilities of selected practice attributes.

The practice autonomy of primary care physician assistants (PAs) is of interest to those organizing, financing, and delivering health services. This study examined the predictive abilities of practice attributes with respect to multidimensional aspects of practice autonomy (clinical decision making and prescriptive authority) in primary care PAs. A sample of 225 practicing PAs was used to construct the 16-item Physician Assistant Autonomy of Practice Instrument (PAAPI), which includes three subscales, routine prescriptive authority, advanced prescriptive authority, and clinical decision making. All were used as dependent variables in multiple regression analyses. The most significant correlates of practice autonomy included years in practice as a PA, years in practice with supervising physician, annual income from practice, recognition as the exclusive primary care provider for patients, primary practice in a rural county, and primary employment setting (single-specialty group practice). More primary care PAs continue to be used in under-served rural areas and in managed care. Organizational structure of the work setting may influence these PAs' practice autonomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Clinical practice: new challenges for the advanced practice nurse.

This report describes the challenges for advanced practice nurses (APNs) relative to supply and demand issues. The article also includes opportunities with the Balanced Budget Act, physician acceptance of Advanced Practice Nurses, and expanding practice opportunities. The challenges include the nursing shortage (both in nursing students and faculty), the aging of the nursing workforce, and a lag in nursing salaries; increased demand for nursing based on aging baby boomers, increasing patient acuity and technology, and new arenas for practice. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 provided new opportunities for advanced practice nurses, including enhanced autonomy to provide services and bill independently of physicians. With these changes come new opportunities for advanced practice nurse entrepreneurs in the areas of independent practice, including opportunities to positively impact the health of families and communities in alignment with the Federal government's vision for "Healthy People 2010." As physician acceptance of advanced practice nurses continues to grow and in light of the changes in medical practice and education (residency reduction), opportunities to expand collaborative practice arrangements also exist. APNs are best suited to make the most of these changes. One example of an opportunity for independent practice, a Community Wellness Center, is developed as an entrepreneurial venture benefiting both the APN and the health of a community. Who better than registered nurses (RNs), especially those practicing at the advanced level, can ensure that these opportunities and challenges are addressed in an ethical manner and focused on the needs and health of the community?

Government Programs↗
PubMed2001

The impact of practice setting on physician perceptions of the quality of practice and patient care in the managed care era.

BACKGROUND: Managed care is practiced in both traditional institutional health maintenance organization (HMO) settings and in a variety of complex and decentralized office-based arrangements. This study examines how practice setting affects physician perceptions of the quality of professional practice and patient care in a managed care environment. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted in 1998 of 1081 physicians in San Mateo County, California, who practice in either a traditional staff group model HMO (SGM-HMO) (n = 113) or office-based independent practice (OBIP) (n = 250). Respondents were surveyed about current and past practice characteristics, income changes, current satisfaction with professional and patient care matters, utility of treatment guidelines and formularies, and general perceptions of managed care. Responses were compared between practice settings using bivariate comparisons and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Physicians in the SGM-HMO and those in OBIP reported similar hours worked per week, time spent with patients during office visits, and total patient encounters per week. Declining income was more frequent in OBIP (61% vs 47%) and relatively more substantial (27% with income declines >25% vs 4% in SGM-HMO). Adjusting for income changes, practice setting, years in practice, and sex, SGM-HMO physicians were significantly more satisfied with a variety of professional and quality of care issues (P<.001), viewed more favorably the utility of treatment guidelines and drug formularies (P<.001), and held more positive general perceptions of managed care (P<.001) than OBIP physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In a managed care environment, SGM-HMO physicians are significantly more satisfied with the quality of practice and patient care than physicians in OBIP. This study suggests that the myriad managed care contracts, formularies, and guidelines received by physicians in OBIPs may lead to more negative perceptions of the quality of professional practice and patient care.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2001

Continuous quality improvement in small general medical practices: the attitudes of general practitioners and other practice staff.

OBJECTIVES: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) offers opportunities to improve care in small-scale office-based practice. Little is yet known about the implementation of CQI in small primary care practices. We studied the attitudes of physicians and staff in small family practices to a model of CQI tailored to office-based practice setting. PRACTICES AND DESIGN: An exploratory study in 20 family practices in The Netherlands. Practices were stimulated to adopt the model for continuous quality improvement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The use of the model at the end of the study period, the perception of the physicians and staff of their success with adopting the model, their view of its usefulness, their willingness to continue and personal and practical obstacles. Measurements were made using written questionnaires. RESULTS: The rate of implementation of the model varied between practices. Participants rated their success in performing improvement projects, holding regular quality meetings and setting targets and priorities. They were positive about the usefulness of the model and they were generally willing to continue to use it. Barriers included the size of workload and the tendency to postpone actions until external support by an outreach visitor was provided. Physician and staff attitudes were homogeneous at a practice level. CONCLUSION: Our findings stress the importance of starting CQI with small, easy-to-handle projects. Workload reduction might be an important issue to focus on. Personal obstacles should be addressed throughout the introduction. We found attitudes in small-scale practices to be homogeneous, so that it was important to pay explicit attention to commitment to CQI from the start of the introduction.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1994

Towards better practice management: a national survey of Scottish general practice management.

Surveys a 50 per cent sample of Scottish practices (stratified by health board area), concerning whether they had a practice manager and who had responsibility for practice management tasks. The overall response rate was 73 per cent, with 63 per cent of responding practices employed a practice manager. Reports the findings from practices employing a manager, and reveals marked variations in levels of managers pay and responsibility. The development of practice management structures varied with only 85 per cent of practices holding regular practice management meetings. The results suggest that practices which previously coped without a manager have recognized the need for one as the complexity of practice administration increases and that the traditional career path of managers involving internal promotion is changing.

Administrative Personnel↗
PubMed1996

Understanding practice management: a qualitative study in general practice.

Reports a qualitative study of practice managers' roles and responsibilities in eight practices in the Grampian region of Scotland. Observes wide variations in the roles and responsibilities of managers associated with the size and fundholding status of the practice. Notes that larger practices had better developed management structures allowing the managers to delegate tasks and undertake a more proactive planning and executive role, and that medium and smaller practices had less well developed management structures and managers were more likely to act as practice administrators with limited autonomy. Concludes that practice managers are playing an increasingly important role in general practice. Also that the influential role of the practice manager in the development of practice policies and the transfer of administrative responsibilities from the partners to the manager have all contributed to a change in general practitioners' perceptions of the practice manager.

Administrative Personnel↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of research general practices and their patients with other practices--a cross-sectional survey in Trent.

BACKGROUND: When interpreting results of studies undertaken by research networks we need to know how representative volunteer practices and their registered patients are of the total population of practices and patients in their locality. AIM: To compare the following in research and non-research general practices in one region: practice and population demography, morbidity and mortality, selected performance indicators, and health outcomes. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Sixty-six Trent Focus Collaborative Research Network general practices and 749 other general practices in Trent, United Kingdom. METHOD: Practice characteristics and GP contract data were obtained from the NHS Executive, Quarry House, Leeds. The Trent Regional NHS Hospital Admission Database was searched to identify all relevant admissions to hospital from all practices between 1 April 1993 and 31 March 1997. Ward-linked data on cancer were obtained from the Trent Cancer Registry. RESULTS: Of the 815 general practices in Trent Region in the study period, 66 (8%) were in the Trent Focus network. They were more likely to be involved in training GPs and to have a female partner. They tended to be larger, with fewer single-handed doctors and younger GPs. Network practices prescribed a higher proportion of generics (median % prescribed/practice = 70%, versus 51%, Mann-Whitney U = 1615, P<0.0001). There were no clinically important differences between hospital admission rates between the two groups or waiting times for surgical procedures. There was no difference in the incidence of cancer and standardised mortality ratios related to the electoral wards of the GP surgery. CONCLUSION: Although there were differences in practice structure and some aspects of performance, we found no important differences in the demography of registered patients, nor in morbidity, mortality, or access to or use of secondary care.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗
PubMed1996

Why don't all general practices offer structured diabetes care? A comparison of practices that do not with those that do.

The aim of the study was to examine whether the minority of practices not qualifying for payment for structured diabetes care programmes differ systematically from those that do. Information was collected for all Leicestershire general practices on practice size, population structure, deprivation indices, diabetes related admissions over two years and number of insulin treated patients on the district register. The 21 practices not offering structured diabetes care had a median list size of 3204, compared to 6340 for the other 124 practices (P < 0.001). Jarman and Townsend scores were higher for these practices and estimated prevalence of diabetes was 29% higher (95% CI: 26-32%). Crude admission rates were significantly higher in those practices not offering structured care. However rates adjusted for diabetes prevalence were similar (39.3 vs 39.2 per 100 insulin treated diabetics per year, P = 0.9). These results suggest that some practices face specific problems related both to small practice size and higher prevalence. If these issues are not addressed, inequalities in access to diabetes care between practice populations will persist. There is no evidence that the provision of structured care is associated with lower admission rates in this district. However more information, particularly in relation to prevalence of diabetes, is needed in order to accurately quantify this relationship. Variations in prevalence between practices should be adjusted for in any comparison of admission rates or spurious conclusions may be drawn.

Diabetes Mellitus↗