Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “p16”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Abnormalities of tumor suppressor gene p16 in pancreatic carcinoma: immunohistochemical and genetic findings compared with clinicopathological parameters.

BACKGROUND: Abnormalities of the tumor suppressor gene p16 have been reported in a variety of human tumors but are rare in pancreatic carcinoma except for cancer cell lines and xenografts. Their clinicopathological significance remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine immunohistochemical and genetic alterations of p16 in primary pancreatic carcinoma tissues and to investigate the relation between abnormalities of p16 and clinicopathological parameters to elucidate their clinicopathological significance. METHODS: We investigated p16 expression in 60 pancreatic carcinoma cases by immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal antibody clone G175-405. In addition, we analyzed genetic alterations of the p16 gene using DNA extracted from microdissected tissue of pancreatic carcinoma, by polymerase chain reaction, nonradioisotopic single-strand conformation polymorphism (non-RI-SSCP), DNA sequencing, and hypermethylation analyses using restriction enzymes. We compared the abnormalities of p16 alterations with clinicopathological parameters to elucidate their significance. RESULTS: On immunohistochemical study, staining for p16 protein was strongly positive in 22 (37%) of 60 pancreatic carcinoma cases, weakly positive in 24 (40%), and negative in 14 (23%). In contrast, p16 mutations were recognized in 9 (15%) of the 60 pancreatic carcinoma cases. The incidence of p16 mutations was 2 (9%) in 22 cases of pancreatic carcinoma with strongly positive staining, 4 (17%) in 24 with weakly positive staining, and 3 (21%) in 14 with negative staining. Hypermethylation of p16 was detected in the two pancreatic carcinoma cases with weakly positive staining, although homozygous deletions were not found in any case. There was no significant correlation between the expression of p16 protein and any of the clinicopathological parameters. However, there was a tendency for the tumor to be larger in patients with decreased expression of p16 protein than in those with normal expression levels. In contrast, the tumor was significantly larger and the survival period significantly shorter for patients with pancreatic carcinoma with p16 mutation or hypermethylation than for those with pancreatic carcinoma with an intact p16 gene (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that p16 alterations may participate in the aggressiveness of pancreatic carcinoma.

Adult↗

Aberrant expression of pRb and p16(INK4), alone or in combination, indicates poor outcome after resection in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

This study aimed to identify potential abnormalities of retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and p16(INK4a) (p16) expression in resectable colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) and to assess the prognostic significance of pRb and p16 levels in patients with CRC. From July 1990 through December 1993, 117 consecutive patients with CRC underwent curative resection with radical lymphadenectomy. The resected specimens were examined immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies to identify abnormalities of pRb and p16 expression. The association of pRb and p16 expression status with clinicopathologic features was analyzed retrospectively. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors independently affecting survival after resection. The median follow-up period was 62 months. Aberrant expression of pRb and p16 was identified in 82 (70%) and 87 (74%) patients, respectively. Coincident abnormalities of these proteins occurred in 61 (52%) patients. Loss of pRb expression correlated with tumor site (P = 0.0119), whereas p16 overexpression correlated with tumor size (P = 0.0034). Coincident abnormalities of pRb and p16 were associated with TNM tumor stage (P = 0.011). The outcome after resection was worse in patients with aberrant expression of pRb and/or p16 than in patients with normally expressed pRb and p16 (for pRb, P = 0.0151; for p16, P = 0.0247). Coincident abnormalities of pRb and p16 indicated the worst patient survival (P = 0.0310). Aberrant expression of pRb and p16 independently affected postresection survival (relative risk = 6.312, P <0.0001; relative risk = 5.994, P <0.0001, respectively). Most CRCs demonstrate aberrant expression of pRb and/or p16 at resectable stages. Aberrant expression of pRb and p16, alone and in combination, heralds poor prognosis in patients with CRC.

Adult↗

p16 expression in the female genital tract and its value in diagnosis.

p16 is a cyclin-dependent kinase-4 inhibitor that is expressed in a limited range of normal tissues and tumors. In recent years, immunohistochemistry with p16 antibodies has been used as a diagnostic aid in various scenarios in gynecologic pathology. Diffuse (as opposed to focal) positivity with p16 in the cervix can be regarded as a surrogate marker of the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). In cervical squamous lesions, p16 is positive in most high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and in some cases of low-grade CIN, usually those associated with high-risk HPV. p16 may be useful to identify small focal high-grade CIN lesions, to distinguish some cases of CIN involving immature metaplastic squamous epithelium from immature metaplastic squamous epithelium not involved by CIN and to distinguish high-grade CIN from benign mimics. Most cervical carcinomas of squamous, glandular, and small cell type are p16-positive. In cervical glandular lesions, p16 is useful, as part of a panel, in the distinction between adenocarcinoma in situ (diffusely positive) and benign mimics, including tuboendometrial metaplasia and endometriosis, which are usually p16-negative or focally positive. p16 may be used, in combination with other markers, to distinguish between a cervical adenocarcinoma (diffuse positivity) and an endometrioid-type endometrial adenocarcinoma (negative or focally positive). Some uterine serous carcinomas are diffusely positive. In the vulva, p16 is positive in HPV-associated vulval intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) but negative in VIN not associated with HPV. Similarly, HPV-associated invasive squamous carcinomas are p16-positive, whereas the more common non-HPV-associated neoplasms are largely negative or focally positive. In the uterus, p16 positivity is more common and widespread in leiomyosarcomas than leiomyomas, and this may be a useful aid to diagnosis, although problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms have not been extensively studied. Metastatic cervical adenocarcinomas in the ovary are usually diffusely p16-positive, and because these may closely mimic a primary ovarian endometrioid or mucinous adenocarcinoma, this may be a valuable diagnostic aid, although p16 expression in primary ovarian adenocarcinomas of these morphologic subtypes has not been widely investigated. Some ovarian serous carcinomas, similar to their uterine counterparts, are p16-positive.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[A study of p16 gene and its protein expression in rhabdomyosarcoma].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between alteration of p16 gene, its protein expression and the pathogenesis and development of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: 44 cases of RMS were examined for alteration of p16 gene with PCR-SSCP and 47 cases of RMS were examined for p16 protein expression with immunohistochemical method. RESULTS: The homozygous deletion of p16 gene was observed in 2 cases and mutations in 6 cases. Of these 8 cases with altered p16 gene, 6 had extensive invasion, recurrence or metastasis. The total negative rate of p16 protein expression in RMS was 38.3% (18/47 cases). Of these 8 cases with alterations of p16 gene, negative expression for p16 protein was observed in 7 cases and positive in only 1 cases. In contrast, no structural abnormalities of the p16 gene were detected in another 11 cases with negative expression of p16 protein. Higher rates of p16 gene abnormality and loss of p16 protein were observed in ARMS than in ERMS. Higher rate of extensive invasion, recurrence or metastasis was also found in the group negative for p16 protein. CONCLUSION: The abnormalities of p16 gene and loss of p16 protein expression may be related to the pathogenesis and development of some RMS.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16↗

[Influence of p16 gene on the biological behavior of human hepatocellular carcinoma].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene p16INK4a is one of the most common genetic alterations in human hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), making it an ideal target gene for treatment of HCC. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of wild p16 gene on the biological behavior of HCC. METHODS: HCC cell strains SNU-449 (loss of p16 protein expression) and HepG2.2. 15 (positive p16 protein expression) were respectively infected by a retrovirus expression vector of p16 gene (pcLXSN-p16). The stable p16 protein expression cell strains were selected. The biological behaviors of the p16 gene transfected HCC cells were observed. RESULTS: SNU-449 with negative p16 protein expression demonstrated that pcLXSN-p16 treatment significantly inhibited cell growth (the amount of cells at G0-G1 phase increased). However, there was no treatment effect when pcLXSN-p16 was transfected in HepG2.2. 15 which has positive p16 protein expression. Subsequent study in a nude mouse model demonstrated that the p16 gene transfected SNU-449 had a lower succeeding rate of first time establishment of tumors and grew more slowly in the nude mice as compared with non-transfected SNU-449. Moreover, the nude mice inoculated with transfected SNU-449 had a longer survival time than those inoculated with non-transfected SNU-449. CONCLUSION: The transfer of wild p16 gene can inhibit the proliferation and reduce the invasion ability of HCC cells with p16 negative expression, but can not affect the HCC cells with p16 positive expression.

Animals↗

Growth suppression of human ovarian cancer cell lines by the introduction of a p16 gene via a recombinant adenovirus.

OBJECTIVE: The cell cycle regulatory protein p16 (CDKN2/cyclin dependent kinase 4 inhibitor/multiple tumor suppressor-1) causes cell cycle arrest at the G1 checkpoint by inhibiting activity of cyclin D-CDK4 complexes. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of introduction of the p16 gene into two ovarian cancer cell lines via a recombinant adenoviral vector (Ad5CMV-p16). METHODS: Cells lines used were SKOV3, which has a p16 deletion, and OVCA420, which has normal p16. Transduction efficiency was established by infecting cells with an adenovirus containing the Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase gene (Ad5CMV-beta-gal) at multiplicity of infection from 0 to 1000 and staining for X-gal. Cells were infected with Ad5CMV-p16 and cell growth was assessed by counting cells every other day for up to 7 days. Western blotting was done to assess for p16 expression after infection. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting after staining with propidium iodide was done to assess the effect of p16 on the cell cycle. RESULTS: The SKOV3 cell line was transduced with the adenovirus at a slightly lower MOI than the OVCA420 cell line. Growth of the Ad5CMV-p16-infected cells was suppressed 75-80% by cell count in both cell lines and caused morphologic changes of the cells consistent with apoptosis. The p16 protein expression was seen to increase within 24 h after introduction of the p16 gene. G1 arrest of cells occurred beginning 24 h after introduction of the p16 gene. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that Ad5CMV-p16 may be further studied as a potential therapeutic agent for ovarian cancer as introduction of the p16 gene into ovarian cancer cell lines causes a G1 arrest and attenuation of growth, regardless of the endogenous p16 status of the cells.

Adenoviruses, Human↗

[Expression of p15 and p16 proteins in tongue squamous cell carcinoma and their significances].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Abnormal expression of p15 and p16 were commonly found in many kinds of primary tumors, but the possible correlation between p15 and p16 abnormalities and tongue neoplasms is still unknown. This study was designed to investigate the expression of p15 and p16 proteins and their possible correlation with clinicopathology and prognosis of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC). METHODS: The expression of p15 and p16 were detected by immunohistochemistry (ultra-sensitive SP method) and the results were analyzed quantitatively by imagine cytometry in 45 cases of TSCC and 10 cases of normal tongue tissues, thereafter, the results were analyzed with clinicopathological parameters and survival time. RESULTS: Both p15 and p16 proteins were expressed in squamous epithelia of the normal tongue tissues. The negative expression rates of p15 and p16 protein in TSCC were 46.7%(21/45) and 66.7%(30/45), respectively. 80%(12/15) of the p16 positive cases accompanied with p15 positive staining. However, 85.7%(18/21) of the cases with p15 deletion exhibited p16 negative expression. Most of the cases with both p15 and p16 co-deletion were found in stage III and IV (16/18). The expression rates of p15 and/or p16 in stage I, II were significantly higher than those in stage III, IV (P< 0.05), while p15 and/or p16 expression rates in node-positive groups were much lower than those in node-negative groups (P< 0.01). p15 deletion, or both p15 and p16 co-deletion group, also had a decreased 3-year survival rate (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION: The expression of p15 and p16 protein are closely associated with clinical stages and cervical lymph node metastasis of TSCC. p15 deletion, or both p15 and p16 co-deletion in TSCC can also predict a poor prognosis. p15 and p16 expression can be used as parameters for evaluating clinical stages and metastatic potential as well as prognosis of TSCC.

Adult↗

p16 is a major inactivation target in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The p16(INK4A) gene encodes 2 cell cycle regulator proteins, p16 and p14(ARF), by alternative splicing. This genetic locus also contains another cell cycle regulator gene, p15(INK4B), which encodes p15. The inactivation of the p16 protein has been demonstrated in some hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs); however, the inactivation of the other 2 cell regulator proteins and their inactivation patterns are not well characterized. METHODS: To characterize the role of the above 3 cell cycle regulator proteins in HCCs, the authors examined the genomic status of the p16(INK4A) and p15(INK4B) genes and their RNA products in 20 HCC tissues and 7 human HCC cell lines. Homozygous deletions in each exon of p16(INK4A) and p15(INK4B) were evaluated by comparative multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the methylation status of the p16(INK4A) and p15(INK4B) promoter region was analyzed by methylation specific PCR. RESULTS: Homozygous deletions were found in 6 of 20 HCCs (30%) and 2 of 7 HCC cell lines (29%). In 20 HCCs, the frequency of homozygous deletions was 20% in exon 1 of p15(INK4B), 20% in exon 2 of p15(INK4B), 10% in exon 1beta of p16(INK4A), 25% in exon 1alpha of p16(INK4A), 15% in exon 2 of p16(INK4A), and 15% in exon 3 of p16(INK4A). The authors found hypermethylation of the p16(INK4A) promoter region in 7 HCCs (35%) and 3 HCC cell lines (43%). The overall frequency of p16 alterations in HCCs, including hypermethylation and homozygous deletions, was 60% (12 of 20 cases). According to reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis, the absence of RNA expression was most frequent in p16 (11 of 20 cases, 55%) and less frequent in p15 (7 of 20 cases, 35%) and p14(ARF) (5 of 20 cases, 25%). CONCLUSIONS: Among the 3 cell cycle regulator proteins encoded at the 9p21 genetic locus, inactivation of p16 is the most frequent event in HCCs in which promoter hypermethylation and homozygous deletions are the common mechanisms.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

Promoter hypermethylation and protein expression of the p16 gene: analysis of 43 cases of B-cell primary gastric lymphomas from China.

The p16 (CDKN2a/INK4a) gene is an important tumor-suppressor gene, involved in the p16/cyclin-dependent kinase/retinoblastoma gene pathway of cell cycle control. The p16 protein is considered to be a negative regulator of the pathway. Promoter hypermethylation resulting in inactivation of the p16 gene has been found in various hematopoietic malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and may play a role in transformation/clinical aggressiveness of those tumors. However, the p16 protein expression in primary gastric lymphoma has not been studied. In this study, we characterize protein expression and promoter hypermethylation of the p16 gene in B-cell primary gastric lymphomas from China. In all, 43 cases of B-cell primary gastric lymphoma were investigated. They consisted of 24 (56%) cases of diffuse large-cell lymphoma, 12 (28%) cases of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma, six (14%) cases of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma with large-cell transformation and one (2%) case of follicular lymphoma. Loss of p16 protein expression was found in 34 (79%) out of 43 cases, while the remaining nine (21%) cases showed positivities for the p16 protein. All 43 cases were further characterized by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to analyze p16 promoter hypermethylation status. In total, 11 (26%) of 43 cases were positive for p16 promoter hypermethylation. Among those, 10 (30%) out of the 33 cases negative for the p16 immunostaining showed promoter hypermethylation, whereas only one (10%) out of the 10 cases that were positive for the p16 immunostaining displayed promoter hypermethylation. Of the 43 cases, 30 had limited pathologic data at the time of resection. Primary gastric lymphoma involved extragastric sites (lymph node or liver) in 17 (57%) of 30 cases, while the remaining 13 (43%) cases were only limited to the stomach. Loss of p16 protein expression was found in 14 (82%) of 17 cases with extragastric involvement and in 11 (85%) of 13 cases without such involvement. In conclusion, loss of p16 protein expression is frequent in those B-cell primary gastric lymphomas and approximately one-third of such loss correlated with promoter hypermethylation. Despite limited pathologic data, loss of p16 protein expression appears not to be correlated with extragastric involvements.

Adolescent↗

[Biallelic inactivation of the p16-Gen in a metachronous triple carcinoma in the oropharyngeal region].

AIMS: Recent studies have shown that most Dutch families with atypical multiple-mole melanoma (FAMMM) have a 19-bp deletion (p16-Leiden) in exon 2 of the p16 gene. Apart from reports on metachronous pancreatic tumors, other cancer types have never been described in such families. Due to heterozygous p16-Leiden constitution, our proband with multiple head and neck carcinomas was a suitable model for studying the type of p16 inactivation according to the Knudson-two-hit model. METHODS: p16 mutations in exons 1 and 2 were determined using PCR-SSCP-Sequencing analysis. p16 methylation was assessed by methylation-specific PCR. RESULTS: All three metachronous (larynx, pharynx, oral cavity) tumors had a methylated p16 promotor. The p16 protein loss detected by immunohistochemistry clearly confirmed a complete loss of p16 tumor suppressor function. Thus, all three tumors exhibited biallelic inactivation of p16, caused by aberrant methylation of the p16 promotor. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on p16-Leiden mutation in head and neck cancer. We provide evidence that the somatic methylation of p16 promotor is associated with the germline transmission of p16-Leiden mutation. This is an example for the rare event of in which aberrant methylation acting as the 'second hit' in a familial cancer syndrome. Our results show that this epigenetic event is equivalent to genetic alterations (mutation/LOH) confirming the Knudson's hypothesis for tumor suppressor gene inactivation.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

Promoter hypermethylation of the p16 gene and loss of its protein expression is correlated with tumor progression in extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas.

CONTEXT: The p16 gene is one of the tumor suppressor genes, and its inactivation results in abnormal regulation of the cell cycle in human neoplasms. Promoter hypermethylation, a mechanism of p16 gene inactivation, has been reported to play an important role in tumorigenesis and to be related to patient prognosis in several carcinomas. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of the p16 gene in extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) carcinomas. DESIGN: We examined promoter hypermethylation of the p16 gene using a methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and the expression of the p16 protein using an immunohistochemical staining method in 90 cases of EBD carcinomas. We then compared the data with various clinicopathologic parameters, including survival rate. RESULTS: Promoter hypermethylation was observed in 69 (77%) of the 90 cases. Of 69 hypermethylated cases, 32 (46%) demonstrated loss of p16 expression. Promoter hypermethylation of the p16 gene was more commonly observed in tumors with vascular invasion (22 [92%] of 24 cases) than without vascular invasion (71%, P = .03). Furthermore, p16 promoter hypermethylation with loss of p16 expression was more frequently observed in cases with lymph node metastasis (P = .006) and higher tumor stage group (P = .04). However, there was no significant difference in survival rate according to the status of p16 promoter methylation and/or p16 expression. CONCLUSION: Promoter hypermethylation is an important mechanism in the inactivation of the p16 gene in EBD carcinogenesis. Furthermore, the loss of p16 expression, with or without p16 gene promoter hypermethylation, is closely related to the tumor progression in EBD carcinomas.

Adenocarcinoma↗

In vitro growth suppression by adenoviral transduction of p21 and p16 in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a research model for combination gene therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the duration of expression of the cell cycle regulators p21 and p16 and the effect of these 2 genes both alone and in combination on the growth of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck cell lines in vitro. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS AND DESIGN: Cells were transduced via an adenoviral vector with p21 (Ad5CMV-p21), p16 (Ad5CMV-p16), or both. Western blotting was performed to determine duration of expression of the protein products of the transduced p21 and p16 genes. In vitro growth assays and cell cycle analyses were performed on transduced cells. RESULTS: Transduced gene products were detected up to day 12 after infection. Western blotting showed high levels of p21 and p16 in transduced cells. Growth suppression was observed in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck cell lines transduced with Ad5CMV-p21, Ad5CMV-p16, or both, but the combination of p21 and p16 did not achieve significantly greater growth suppression than that seen in cells transduced with Ad5CMV-p16 alone. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated that the percentage of cells arrested at G1 stage in the cells transduced with Ad5CMV-p16 was similar to that in the cells transduced with both Ad5CMV-p21 and Ad5CMV-p16. No significant in vivo growth suppression was observed in tumor nodules treated with Ad5CMV-p16. CONCLUSIONS: Although p21 and p16 are believed to function as cell cycle regulators of cyclin-dependent kinases, we observed no additive or synergistic effect when using them in combination. The expression of transduced p21 and p16 gene products up to days 9 and 12, respectively, was consistent with the growth suppression and cell cycle arrest observed. This work provides information on the previously uncharacterized duration of p21 and p16 transgene product expression and also lends insight into the interaction of these 2 cell cycle regulators in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Adenoviruses, Human↗

Short hairpin RNA system to inhibit human p16 in squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To develop short hairpin RNA (shRNA) vectors and virions to trigger RNA interference against human p16. DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS: A modular vector-based shRNA system was used to construct multiple distinct shRNA vectors against the unique exon 1alphaof p16. Target sequences were designed using rigid criteria for length and GC content, along with basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) evaluation to ensure targeting specificity. Individual shRNA-p16 cassettes were then cotransfected with a p16 expression vector and evaluated by Western blot. Cassettes showing a high level of p16 repression were used to construct shRNA-p16 expressing adenoviral and retroviral vectors and tested in a human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma line expressing endogenous and exogenous p16. RESULTS: Adenoviral and retroviral transfer of shRNA-p16 significantly reduced p16 protein levels, while control constructs left p16 expression unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Although p16 is a common target of inactivation in head and neck cancer, its biological role remains ill defined. RNA interference is rapidly becoming the standard to target selected genes of interest for inactivation. We have successfully inhibited p16 expression using shRNA cassettes with strong activity against human p16 and integrated these constructs into adenoviral and retroviral vectors for transient and integrated expression in human cells. Application of this novel modular system to primary human cells will allow the biological consequences of p16 loss to be examined both in vitro and in vivo.

Adenoviridae↗

In vitro and in vivo tumor growth inhibition by a p16-mimicking peptide in p16INK4A-defective, pRb-positive human melanoma cells.

The cell cycle regulatory pathway responsible for the control of the late-G1 checkpoint is found recurrently altered in human malignant melanoma, often due to lack of functional p16 or pRb (pRb-1) proteins. Here we examined the ability of p16-derived peptides to mimic p16 function in two exemplary human melanoma cell lines: the p16-defective, pRb-positive A375M cells and p16-positive, pRb-defective A2058 cells. The synthetic p16-mimicking peptides strongly induced apoptosis in p16-, pRb+ A375M cells in vitro, while they had significantly less activity on p16+, pRb- A2058 cells. The most active p16-mimicking peptide, p16-AP9, also potently inhibited in vivo growth of the A375M melanoma. Treated tumors showed a threefold smaller volume (P < 0.025) and a significant reduction of the mitotic index and of PCNA expression. Growth of A2058 cells in vivo was not affected by treatment with the p16-mimicking peptide. Our results demonstrate that p16-mimicking peptides can induce apoptosis in vitro and that can inhibit tumor growth in vivo in p16-defective, pRb-expressing human melanoma cells, suggesting that p16-mimicking peptides can represent a promising tool for targeted therapy in selected cancer phenotypes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

p16 expression in sentinel nodes with metastatic breast carcinoma: evaluation of its role in developing triaging strategies for axillary node dissection and a marker of poor prognosis.

Not all patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) in a sentinel lymph node (SLN) have metastasis in additional axillary nodes (ANs). A biological marker that can predict this occurrence may be beneficial in triaging only appropriate patients for AN dissection (AND). Our aim was to study p16 expression in SLNs and to determine whether it is a predictor of metastases to additional ANs and a marker of poor prognosis. We correlated p16 expression in SLNs and ANs of 54 patients with MBC with clinicopathologic features and the nodal proliferative index (PI). We sequenced p16 from DNA in 7 cases. We found that 35 of 54 cases (65%) had p16-positive tumor cells. Nine of 17 (53%) cases in which both SLN and AND were done had MBC in additional ANs. The SLNs of 8 of 9 cases (89%) were p16 positive (73% positive predictive value). Eight of 17 (47%) cases had no metastases in ANs even though their SLNs had metastases. The SLNs of 5 of 8 (62.5%) of these cases were p16 negative (83% negative predictive value). Ductal MBCs were p16 positive in 27 of 37 cases (73%). Carcinomas with a lobular component were p16 negative in 9 of 11 cases (82%). Nine of 12 (75%) p16-negative ductal carcinomas were estrogen receptor (ER) positive. Some 75% of T2 and T3 tumors were p16 positive, compared with 50% of T1 tumors. The highest PI (defined as > or =50%) was seen in p16-positive SLNs (5 of 6 cases). The p16 DNA sequence was normal, and no mutations were found. Our findings indicate that p16 expression in SLNs with MBC predicts (1) increased likelihood of metastasis in additional ANS, and its expression along with other markers and clinicopathologic parameters may serve as an indicator for proceeding to a formal AND; (2) poor prognosis and is associated with larger primary tumors with a high nodal PI and ER-negative status; and (3) histological subtypes. Gene mutations were not responsible for the expression of p16 in our cases.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Association of K-ras mutations with p16 methylation in human colon cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: K-ras mutations are early genetic changes in colon cancer. p16, a tumor-suppressor gene, is inactivated in neoplasms by mutation, deletion, or methylation. The aims of this study were to determine p16 methylation status and its possible association with K-ras mutations in human colon cancer. METHODS: DNA isolated from 8 colon cancer cell lines and 41 microdissected human colon tissue samples was analyzed. p16 methylation status was determined using two analytical methods. The level of p16 expression was determined by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and Northern blot. K-ras mutations were determined by DNA sequence analysis. The DNA methyltransferase activity was determined by microassay. Parental and K-ras-transformed IEC-18 cells were used to determine the potential association between K-ras mutations and p16 methylation. RESULTS: Methylated p16 was found in 100% of colon cancer cell lines, 55% of colon cancers, 54% of adenomas, and 25% of transitional mucosa but not in normal colonic epithelium. Forty-five percent of cancers and 38% of adenomas showed both K-ras mutations and p16 methylation. Of 11 cancers and adenomas with K-ras mutation, 10 specimens showed methylated p16. In contrast, of 13 adenomas and cancers with wild-type K-ras, only 3 specimens showed methylated p16 (P = 0.001). Stable transformation of IEC-18 cells with K-ras increased the DNA methyltransferase activity, methylated the p16 gene, and suppressed the expression of p16. Treatment with a DNA methylation inhibitor (azadeoxycytidine) resulted in reexpression of p16 in K-ras-transformed IEC-18 cells, suggesting that the expression of p16 was suppressed by DNA methylation. CONCLUSIONS: p16 methylation occurs frequently in human colonic adenomas and cancers and is closely associated with K-ras mutations.

Azacitidine↗

Alteration of p16 (CDKN2) gene is associated with interleukin-2-induced tumor cell growth in adult T-cell leukemia.

Because tumorigenesis frequently involves the dysfunction of cell cycle-related proteins, we examined the effect of mutations in CDK inhibitor p16 and its linked genomic loci p15, cl.B, and 1063.7 on the growth of primary adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) cells. Southern blot analysis of primary ATL cells showed a significantly higher incidence of p16 gene alteration in acute ATL than in chronic ATL [67.7% (23/34) vs. 26.1% (6/23), respectively; p<0.003]. Similarly, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of p16 exon 2 revealed a higher incidence of alteration in acute ATL than in chronic ATL [52.9% (18/34) vs. 26.1% (6/23), respectively; p<0.05]. PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism analysis of exons 1 and 2 of p16 showed no mutations in the patients, with normal pattern by Southern blotting or PCR analysis. Notably five of six chronic ATL patients with abnormal p16 genes progressed to acute crisis within 4 months. PCR analysis of the p16 linked loci 1063.7, p15 exon 2, and cl.B found homozygous deletion in 55.9%, 20.6%, and 2.9% of acute ATL cells and 39.1%, 13.0%, and 0% of chronic ATL cells, respectively, showing no relationship of homozygous deletion in either loci with disease subtypes. In most cases, deletions were seen in multiple genes, including p16. Acute ATL cells had a higher frequency of multigene deletions than chronic ATL cells [44.1% vs. 17.4%; p<0.05]. When leukemic cells were analyzed for interleukin 2 (IL-2) responsive growth, only p16 gene alteration was directly associated with leukemic cell growth activity. Among leukemic cells showing high IL-2 responsiveness, 73.1% (19/26) had p16 gene alteration vs. 27.8% (5/18) of leukemic cells that showed low IL-2 responsiveness (p<0.005). p16 gene alteration was found in 73.3% (14/19) of leukemic cells showing high autonomous growth rates but in only 40.0% (10/25) of those leukemic cells showing low autonomous growth (p<0.03). These results suggest the following: alteration of p16-related genomic regions in ATL is usually a wide rearrangement including the p16 gene; within this region, only p16 gene alteration is associated with disease aggressiveness; and p16 gene deletion may be a proximate event in leukemogenesis.

Blotting, Southern↗

Conditional expression of the tumor suppressor p16 in a heterotopic glioblastoma model results in loss of pRB expression.

We have expressed the tumor suppressor p16 under the control of a tetracycline-sensitive promoter in two human glioblastoma cell lines which do not contain endogenous p16. Ectopic p16 expression led to a stable but reversible G1 phase cell cycle arrest, reduced the growth of both cell lines in cell culture, and almost abolished their in vitro tumorigenicity. U-87MG-tTA-p16 glioblastoma cells consistently formed tumors after subcutaneous injection into the flanks of nude mice. p16 expression in these tumors was strictly dependent on the presence or absence of tetracycline in the drinking water. Ectopic p16 reduced the tumor take rate (in vivo tumorigenicity) of U-87MG-tTA-p16 cells from 18/20 (90%) to 5 tumors/12 (42%) tumor cell injections. p16 positive and negative tumors differed with respect to their Ki67 labeling indices (34 +/- 4% vs. 52 +/- 6% , P < 0.001, student's t-test). These data are consistent with an in vitro and in vivo glioma suppressor role for p16. Interestingly, we observed a secondary reduction of pRB expression in tumors (and cell cultures) exposed to p16 for > or = 10 (6) days. pRB is p16's major downstream target. Hence, this finding might explain, why p16 expression neither significantly affected the morphology nor led to a reduction of size or growth rate of the tumors. Loss of pRB following p16 expression might severely limit the potential benefit of p16 gene therapy for glioblastoma.

Animals↗