SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Wool fibres are hairs and the term 'wool' is usually restricted to describe the fine curly hairs that constitute the fleece produced by sheep. In a broader sense, it can be used to describe the fleeces produced by related species such as goat or yak. Research into the biology of wool growth and the structure of the wool fibre has been driven by the demands of the wool industry to improve both the efficiency of growing wool and the quality of the product. Well beyond this very applied perspective however, the wool follicle is a unique basic research model for the life sciences in general. These unique features include, to name just a few selected examples, accessibility for studying the molecular controls involved in branching of secondary epithelial-mesenchymal structures, the photoperiod-dependence of regenerating tissue interaction systems, the origin of fibre curliness and follicle wave pattern formation, and the effect of alterations in nutrient supply on epithelial growth and fibre structure. In this review, investigation of growth processes in the formation of the wool fibre is broadly surveyed. The relevance and potential for practical outcomes through characterization of wool follicle genes are discussed and particular features of the wool follicle contributing to our knowledge of the biology of hair growth are highlighted. The practical potential of gene discovery in wool research is the provision of molecular markers for selective breeding and for altering wool growth and wool structure by other biological pathways such as sheep transgenesis that could lead to novel wool properties. In this background, the current review attempts to revive general interest in the fascinating biology of the wool follicle which is not only of profound economic and practical importance but offers an exquisite, highly instructive research model for addressing key questions of modern biology.
Immunological status and respiratory function were studied in a group of 64 wool textile workers (52 women and 12 men). A group of 46 workers not exposed to wool dust served as a control for the respiratory symptoms and immunologic testing. Skin testing was performed with different wool allergens (domestic and Australian) as well as with common allergens. Ventilatory capacity was measured in wool workers on Mondays before and after the work shift. The prevalence of positive skin tests to all allergens was higher in wool than in control workers, although the difference was statistically significant only for washed domestic wool (wool workers: 42.2%; control workers: 19.6%; p < 0.05). Increased serum IgE levels were more frequent in wool (26.6%) than in control workers (3.1%) (p < 0.01). In wool textile workers there was a high prevalence of acute and chronic respiratory symptoms. Significant across-shift reductions in ventilatory capacity tests, as well as abnormal baseline lung function, were recorded in wool textile workers. Individual data demonstrated that many of the wool workers had FEF25 lower than 70% of predicted. In general, the prevalence of symptoms and the lung function abnormalities did not correlate with the results of specific (wool) skin tests. Our data indicate that exposure to wool dust in some workers may be associated with the development of acute and chronic respiratory symptoms and impairment of lung function. Immunologic abnormalities, although frequent in this group, do not appear to be associated with the severity of these changes.
Flumethasone was given to Merino wethers weighing 30-50 kg at rates of 0.62-1.35 mg/kg(0.75) by intravenous (experiments 1 and 2), intraruminal (experiment 4) and subcutaneous (experiment 5) routes over 8 days. In experiment 3, 1.2 mg flumethasone/kg(0.75) was given intravenously over 4, 5 or 6 days. The plasma concentration profiles showed concentrations in the order: intravenous greater than subcutaneous greater than intraruminal. Plasma concentration patterns usually were highest during the first 48 h of infusion followed by relatively stable values. This last feature was not evident in experiments when the rate of hormone infusion was increased. Estimates of the metabolic clearance rates for flumethasone in experiments 1, 2 and 5 were 200-700 ml/min during the equilibrium concentration periods. The effects of flumethasone on some aspects of wool growth revealed interactions between the routes of administration, the period of dosage and the rate of wool growth in the recipients. In experiments 1 and 2 intravenous infusion of 1.20-1.33 mg flumethasone/kg(0.75) caused the shedding of all wool fibres about 30 days after treatment. Some effects of dosing sheep with flumethasone at a time when wool growth was decreasing were also observed in experiment 2. Flumethasone given at a rate of 1.2 mg/kg(0.75) over 4, 5 or 6 days caused the shedding of only some wool fibres which were firmly retained on the sheep by the continuous fibres. Intraruminal and subcutaneous infusions of 0.62-1.35 mg flumethasone/kg(0.75) had similar results to the last in the majority of animals although in a few cases no discontinuity of wool fibres was observed. Recovery in wool growth was observed after treatment. Animals regained their pretreatment wool growth in experiments 1, 4 and 5 by 60 days after treatment and probably equalled at that time wool growth in controls. Recovery was retarded in some individuals in experiment 2 and in some groups in experiment 3. In experiment 1, 21 days wool growth was estimated to have been lost. Some aspects of complete versus partial shedding of wool fibres are discussed particularly with reference to wool harvesting. Some similarities in the appearance of fleeces of steroid-treated sheep and naturally shedding animals are also discussed. In some experiments, particularly when the infusion rate of flumethasone was increased (experiment 3), the sheep showed temporary but significant feed refusals during, but more commonly after, treatment. Speculative discussion as to the metabolic causes of this response is included.
In assessing the health evidence concerning man-made mineral fibers, the chemical composition, surface activity, durability, and size of fibers have to be taken into account. Special-purpose fine glass fibers need to be separated from the insulation wools (glass, rock, and slag wool). The epidemiological evidence is sufficient to conclude that there has been no mesothelioma risk to workers producing or using glass wool, rock wool, or slag wool. The epidemiological studies have been large and powerful, and they show no evidence of a cause-effect relationship between lung cancer and exposure to glass wool, rock wool, or slag wool fibers. There is some evidence of a small cancer hazard attached to the manufacturing process in slag wool plants 20 to 50 years ago, when asbestos was used in some products and other carcinogenic substances were present. However, this hazard is not associated with any index of exposure to slag wool itself. Animal inhalation studies of ordinary insulation wools also show that there is no evidence of hazard associated with exposure to these relatively coarse, soluble fibers. The evidence of carcinogenicity is limited to experiments with special-purpose fine durable glass fibers or experimental fibers, and only when these fibers are injected directly into the pleural or peritoneal cavity. Multiple chronic inhalation studies of these same special-purpose fine glass fibers have not produced evidence of carcinogenicity. It is suggested that the present IARC evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of insulation wools should be revised to Category 3: not classifiable as to carcinogenicity to humans.
Our study investigated a group of 216 wool textile workers (158 women and 58 men). Respiratory symptoms were assessed by questionnaire in wool textile workers and in 130 not exposed (control) workers. Ventilatory capacity was measured in wool workers by recording maximum expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curves on Monday before and after the work shift. Forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and flow rates at 50% and the last 25% of the vital capacity (FEF50, FEF25) were measured on the MEFV curves. Analysis of the data demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of all chronic respiratory symptoms in wool workers than in controls, being the highest in wool workers for nasal catarrh (M: 63.8%; F: 44.9%) and for sinusitis (M: 62.1%; F: 43.0%). A high prevalence of acute symptoms, associated with the work shift, was also noted in wool workers. Exposure to wool dust caused significant across-shift reductions of ventilatory capacity varying from 1.4% for FEV1 to 9.1% for FEF50. Textile workers exposed to wool for > 10 years in the workplace had similar across-shift reductions of ventilatory capacity tests as those with shorter exposures. In a large number of these wool workers, FEF50 and FEF25 were below 70% of predicted normal values. Smokers had acute and chronic lung function changes similar to those of nonsmokers, indicating that smoking did not account for all the respiratory effects seen in wool processing workers. Our data suggest that dust exposures in wool textile mills may be associated with the development of chronic respiratory symptoms and impaired lung function.
Administration of the methionine analogue methoxinine (O-methyl-DL-homoserine) to sheep substantially changed the composition of wool; in addition wool fibres were weakened and the staple crimp frequency was reduced for a prolonged period. The proportions of high-tyrosine proteins were reduced by 40-45% whereas the high-sulfur proteins were usually slightly increased. The content of high-tyrosine proteins in wool was still depressed in most sheep 70 days after dosing with methoxinine. These experiments supported a previous finding that the cystine content of wool and its crimp frequency are not causally related. Ethionine, another methionine analogue, did not consistently change the composition of wool. In some sheep there was no change in the proportions of high-tyrosine proteins following administration of ethionine, even though weak wool was produced. This result, together with the lack of association between the content of high-tyrosine proteins and the strength of wool fibres in a sheep given methoxinine plus methionine, indicates that a reduction of the high-tyrosine proteins is not a prerequisite for the production of weak wool. Neither a threefold increase in the phenylalanine intake by mice nor the administration of three analogues of phenylalanine (4-fluoro-DL-phenylalanine, 4-chloro-DL-phenylalanine and beta-(2-thienyl)-DL-alanine) to sheep altered the composition of hair or wool. Fluorophenylalanine was incorporated into all the constituent proteins of wool to the extent of c. 2% of phenylalanine residues. The other analogues studied could not be detected in wool.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the roles of shade, fleece length and wool type in the protection of sheep from Hypericum perforatum poisoning. ANIMALS: Adult Merino ewes of superfine, fine and medium wool type. DESIGN: Seventy sheep were divided into seven equal groups. During late spring and summer a series of successive, replicate experiments was conducted, each using one group and lasting 5 days. The sheep carried 14 to 24 weeks wool growth. In each experiment the treatments tested were Hypericum +, sunlight + (n = 7); Hypericum +, sun - (n = 1); Hypericum -, sun + (n = 1); Hypericum -, sun - (n = 1). Next, 24 sheep in two equal groups were used in experiments of similar design to the above. Each group consisted of nine recently (1 to 3 weeks previously) shorn and three wool covered (25 to 26 weeks growth) sheep. The treatments tested were Hypericum +, sunlight +, fleece - (n = 9); Hypericum +, sun -, fleece + (n = 1); Hypericum -, sun +, fleece + (n = 1); Hypericum -, sun -, fleece + (n = 1). PROCEDURES: Finely milled Hypericum was administered by gavage to provide 3 mg hypericin / kg body weight. Sheep were sheltered from direct sunlight or were exposed for 5 h per day for 4 successive post-treatment days. Rectal temperatures were measured immediately before and at the end of each sunlight exposure session. Rectal temperature above 40 degrees C was considered indicative of hypericin poisoning. RESULTS: After Hypericum treatment hypericin poisoning was displayed by 26.5% of woolled sheep that were exposed to sunlight, but by none of those that were fully shaded. In similarly treated but recently shorn sheep 94% displayed hypericin poisoning when exposed to sunlight. In the wool covered group the percentages of poisoned animals based on wool type were: superfine 14%, fine 28.5%, medium 33.3%. In the recently shorn group the percentage for all three approached 100%. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of Merinos with at least 14 weeks wool growth will not be poisoned by a single oral dose of 3 mg hypericin /kg, but because hypericin persists in the blood circulation for several days this safe dose will be lowered by continuous daily ingestion. Sheep with access to substantial areas of shade could safely ingest much greater amounts of hypericin. Wool removal greatly increases the risk of poisoning. Superfine Merinos with a wool cover should be able to ingest more hypericin than comparable, medium wool types, without any increased risk of poisoning. The ability of ruminant livestock to safely ingest Hypericum is probably determined more by the amount of skin protection they have against incident sunlight than by differences in hypericin metabolism and excretion capacity.
The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether differences in retention time (RT) of digesta in the rumen are associated with individual differences in wool growth rate between Merino rams. Fifty-eight rams were offered a pelleted diet at ad libitum and restricted levels. Digesta RT in the rumen was estimated from fecal excretion plots using 51Cr-mordanted feed as a marker. Wool growth rate during feeding for ad libitum intake was linearly correlated to DMI (r = .37; P < .01) and RT (r = -.32; P < .01). Multiple logistic regression analysis, used to overcome multicollinearity, showed that RT per se exerted a greater effect (P < .07) than DMI (P < .34) on wool growth rate at ad libitum feed intake. When data were blocked by wool growth rate keeping mean BW constant over all groups, high wool producers had shorter (P < .01) RT than low wool producers. Using the probability values of the multiple logistic regression analysis (CATMOD), the probability of obtaining a low wool growth rate with long RT was estimated to be .73, whereas that of obtaining a low wool growth rate with short RT approximated zero, in the ad libitum period. During the restricted feeding period, the probability of obtaining a low wool growth rate with long RT was estimated to be .46, whereas that of obtaining a low wool growth rate with short RT was estimated to be .17. Repeatability, the upper limit of heritability, was .45 (P < .01) and .6 (P < .01), using regression correlation and Spearman rank correlation coefficients, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
In most sheep breeds, wool growth varies seasonally and is correlated with changes in photoperiod, temperature, and nutrition. Wool growth regulation by these factors may result from systemic changes, or to a response localized at the wool follicle. Possible roles of systemic and local factors have been examined here by comparison of wool growth responses in vitro and in vitro. Wool follicles were isolated and maintained under conditions facilitating fibre growth for at least 4 days. The wool growth rate by follicles isolated regularly over a 10 month period was invariate (P > 0.10), in contrast to a seasonally varying wool growth rate by follicles from the same animals in vivo (P < 0.001). Although a high energy, high protein diet increased wool growth in vivo (P < 0.05), cultured follicles isolated from these animals showed no change in growth rate (P > 0.10). These observations suggest that the regulation of wool growth by environmental factors is extrafollicular and that there is no carryover of the in vivo growth rate when follicles are isolated and systemic signals are therefore removed. Additional work discussed here examined the regulation of pelage by prolactin and melatonin, potential endocrine mediators of photoperiod. The fibre production rate by isolated follicles maintained in control media was not different to that of prolactin or melatonin supplemented follicles (P > 0.10). It is concluded that selective breeding of domesticated sheep has suppressed the response of follicles to regulation by prolactin and melatonin. Studies currently underway using in situ RT-PCR will provide further characterization of this conclusion.
The project 'EXTRETEX' funded by the German Federal Foundation Environment (DBU, Osnabrück, Germany) aims at the improvement of wool properties dyeability, handle, felting behaviour and degree of whiteness by means of enzymes derived from extremophilic micro-organisms. In this paper the effects of a commercial thermo- and alkalistable protease on wool with regard to the degree of whiteness, the dyeability and the felting behaviour are presented. A method to treat wool top and wool fabric was developed on a laboratory scale in which the protease was integrated into the pre-washing step of a dyeing process. This treatment method was than scaled up and tested on an industrial winch beck for fabric. With this method-the addition of enzyme in the pre-washing step-the degree of whiteness is generally enhanced. Dyeing untreated and the enzyme-treated wool with Lanasol Blue 8G leads to an improved dyestuff uptake and a distinctive difference in the colour shade for the latter. Microscopy pictures of fibre cross-sections of these samples display a more even distribution of the dyestuff and a better penetration in the enzyme-treated wool fibres but the colour fastness of the enzyme-treated wool is decreased. Though the felting behaviour of the protease treated wool is significantly improved the felting tendency is still too high for an antifelting finish. An increased damage of the enzyme-treated wool in comparison with the untreated one was not observed.
Epidemiological studies of workers in wool textile mills have shown a direct relation between the concentration of wool dust in the air and respiratory symptoms. Injurious effects of wool dust on the bronchial epithelium could be important in causing inflammation and irritation. A pulmonary epithelial cell line in vitro was therefore used to study the toxic effects of wool dust. Cells of the A549 epithelial cell line were labelled with 51Cr and treated with whole wool dusts and extracts of wool, after which injury was assessed. Also, the effects of grain dust, which also causes a form of airway obstruction, were studied. The epithelial injury was assessed by measuring 51Cr release from cells as an indication of lysis, and by monitoring cells which had detached from the substratum. No significant injury to A549 cells was caused by culture with any of the dusts collected from the air but surface "ledge" dust caused significant lysis at some doses. Quartz, used as a toxic control dust, caused significant lysis at the highest concentration of 100 micrograms/well. To determine whether any injurious material was soluble the dusts were incubated in saline and extracts collected. No extracts caused significant injury to epithelial cells. A similar lack of toxicity was found when 51Cr labelled control alveolar macrophages were targets for injury. Significant release of radiolabel was evident when macrophages were exposed to quartz at concentrations of 10 and 20 micrograms/well, there being no significant injury with either wool or grain dusts. These data suggest that neither wool nor grain dust produce direct injury to epithelial cells, and further studies are necessary to explain inflammation leading to respiratory symptoms in wool and grain workers.
Global competition for selling lamb and wool requires sheep producers to effectively prioritize wool and lamb production. Both products are produced simultaneously, and this makes it difficult to differentially assess costs and net returns. This study addressed this issue by developing coefficients for use in financial analysis of lamb and wool profitability across and within five regions of the United States (Eastern, Midwestern, Intermountain West, Great Basin, and Texas). A procedure was developed using a sheep simulation model to partition the amount of nutrients used for lamb and wool production and then using the partitioning information to determine the proportion of costs to be assessed to lamb and wool production. Blackface breed types, when managed without nutritional limitations, had lamb and wool coefficients of .90 and .10, respectively. Wool breeds with unlimited and limited nutrition had lamb coefficients between .80 and .20 and .60 and .40, respectively. In-depth analysis of the Great Basin system indicated that wool and its improvement may contribute as much, if not more, under certain pricing conditions, as increased prolificacy to enterprise profitability. With low lamb prices ($1.32/kg) and moderate wool prices, the partial net returns for a Merino x Rambouillet were higher than the tested prolific breed type ($13.85 vs $11.27/ewe, respectively). This ranking was reversed under high ($2.31/kg) lamb prices ($47.90 vs $55.22, respectively). The derived method provides a basis for analyzing, comparing, and making management and breeding objective decisions.
OBJECTIVES: To determine frequency and type of respiratory and allergic symptoms in textile workers employed in early stages of wool processing. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in four wool textile mills. 202 subjects (n. 148 males, 54 females, mean age 38.9 yrs, SD 9.5) employed in early stages (combing, n. 138, carding, n. 64) of wool processing were examined and an environmental survey was carried out to determine the level of wool dust exposure. All subjects were submitted to clinical interview, spirometry and measurement of serum specific IgE (s-IgE) against extracts of two wool lots (Australia and New Zealand) by means of RAST. In the subjects with a positive questionnaire for allergic symptoms serum specific IgE for common pneumoallergens were measured (PHADIATOP test). RESULTS: We found higher air dust concentrations during carding operations (inspirable fraction-IF-: range 1.6-20 mg/m3; respirable fraction (RF): 0.5-6.9 mg/m3) and lower concentrations during combing (IF 0.3-0.7 mg/m3, RF 0.1-0.3 mg/m3). 70 out of 202 subjects (34.7%, n. 26 employed in carding and n. 44 in combing operations) reported work-related symptoms. Cutaneous itching was reported by 30 subjects, upper airway irritation by 24, ocular irritation by 17 and dyspnoea by 5. Globally 27 subjects (13.4%) had respiratory work-related symptoms. 12 subjects reported only seasonal respiratory symptoms not related to work. Within the group of 82 symptomatic subjects, 62 (75.6%) had serum specific IgE for common pneumoallergens. In the whole group (n. 202) mean basal FEV-1 was L 3.6, SD 0.9 (103.6% of predicted values). No significant difference was found in basal FEV-1 between carding and combing workers. No s-IgE against the two wool extracts was detectable in any of the 202 examined subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that in early stages of wool processing: 1) the overall frequency of respiratory work-related symptoms is low and does not seem to be related to the stages of processing, 2) symptoms are mainly nasal and/or ocular; 3) serum s-IgE against wool extracts are not detectable. We conclude that respiratory allergy risk in wool textile mills is low.
A stepwise approach was used to develop a supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) method for analysis of synthetic pyrethroids (SPs) on a wool matrix, commencing with a simple inert matrix to examine the solubility of the pyrethroids in the extraction fluid CO(2) and then extended to the real wool matrix. Chemometric approaches were used to determine the SFE optimum conditions. It was found that pyrethroids were readily extractable from an inert matrix over a wide range of pressure (170-350 atm) and at low temperature (<90 degrees C). Subambient hexane efficiently trapped the compounds from the depressurised fluid. Excessively high pressure and temperature resulted in poor trapping, isomerisation and possibly degradation of some components. With spiked wool samples method modifications focused on reducing the coextraction of grease, a bulk matrix component of raw wool. By using alumina (containing 8% moisture) and operating the extraction at 50 degrees C, 200 atm for 60 min, sufficiently clean extracts of pyrethroids suitable for gas chromatography-electron-capture detection analysis were obtained. The recoveries of all SPs were satisfactory (78-101%) over the range of 0.5-5 microg/g levels of these compounds. The precision of the entire analysis procedure was comparable to the conventional Soxhlet extraction method. Detection limits of some commonly used SPs for sheep treatment were also evaluated. Comparable results relative to those achieved by solvent extraction for incurred wool samples were obtained with a recovery of 81-85%. The results, however, suffered high uncertainties (R.S.D. approximately 19-24%) due to the small amount of wool sample taken in each extraction and the suspected inhomogeneity of the wool. Different persistences of cypermethrin isomers in wool were observed.