Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vision Disparity”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Binocular eye movements caused by the perception of three-dimensional structure from motion.

We report that the perception of three-dimensional structure from monocular two-dimensional images changing over time--the kinetic depth effect (KDE)--can evoke binocular eye movements consistent with a three-dimensional percept. We used a monocular KDE stimulus that induced a vivid perception of a rigid three-dimensional sphere rotating in space. The gaze directions of both eyes were measured while observers pursued the motion of a patch on the surface of the perceived sphere as it went through a complete revolution. We found that the eyes converged when the patch was perceived on the front surface of the KDE sphere and diverged when the patch was perceived in the back. The pattern, magnitude and dynamics of binocular eye movements observed in the KDE experiment resembled those obtained when subjects viewed binocularly a light-emitting diode (LED) rotating in space and to the responses obtained with a dynamic stereogram simulating a rotating random dot sphere. Thus, the perception of three-dimensional structure from motion, stereopsis, or motion and stereopsis combined, were effective in guiding binocular eye movements.

Convergence, Ocular↗
PubMed2006

Individual differences in the asymmetry of binocular saccades, analysed with mixed-effects models.

We analysed the reliability of individual differences in parameters of binocular saccadic eye movements. During saccades between isovergent targets, the movement of the right and left eye are not exactly symmetrical (conjugate). Typically, the abducting eye has a shorter latency and reaches a higher velocity, so that a transient divergence occurs during the saccade. For the asymmetry in latency and for the maximum of transient divergence, we applied statistical mixed-effects models in a repeated-measures design with 39 subjects and found that the variability between subjects was much larger than the variability from Sessions 1 to 2 (about 8 days later). The retest correlations were 0.54 for the latency difference, and 0.82 for the transient divergence maximum. We conclude that significant individual differences exist in the asymmetry of binocular saccades and that these can be observed with about 20 saccadic trials per subject.

Attention↗
PubMed2004

Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry.

Investigation of perceptual rivalry between conflicting stimuli presented one to each eye can further understanding of the neural underpinnings of conscious visual perception. During rivalry, visual awareness fluctuates between perceptions of the two stimuli. Here, we demonstrate that high-level perceptual grouping can promote rivalry between stimulus pairs that would otherwise be perceived as nonrivalrous. Perceptual grouping was generated with point-light walker stimuli that simulate human motion, visible only as lights placed on the joints. Although such walking figures are unrecognizable when stationary, recognition judgments as complex as gender and identity can accurately be made from animated displays, demonstrating the efficiency with which our visual system can group dynamic local signals into a globally coherent walking figure. We find that point-light walker stimuli presented one to each eye and in different colors and configurations results in strong rivalry. However, rivalry is minimal when the two walkers are split between the eyes or both presented to one eye. This pattern of results suggests that processing animated walker figures promotes rivalry between signals from the two eyes rather than between higher-level representations of the walkers. This leads us to hypothesize that awareness during binocular rivalry involves the integrated activity of high-level perceptual mechanisms in conjunction with lower-level ocular suppression modulated via cortical feedback.

Dominance, Ocular↗
PubMed2005

The interaction between binocular rivalry and negative afterimages.

Afterimage formation, historically attributed to retinal mechanisms, may also involve postretinal process. Consistent with this notion are results from experiments, reported here, investigating the interaction between binocular rivalry and negative afterimages (AIs). In Experiment 1, one eye was exposed to a grating never consciously experienced by the observer because this grating remained suppressed in rivalry throughout induction (the exclusively dominant stimulus was designed to preclude formation of an AI). As expected, the suppressed grating generated a vivid AI whose orientation could be accurately identified; not surprisingly, the strength of this AI varied with induction contrast. Experiment 2 revealed, however, that the strength of this AI produced during suppression was significantly weaker than the AI produced by that same stimulus when it was visible throughout the entire induction period, implying that some component of AI induction is susceptible to interocular suppression. In Experiment 3, AIs of dichoptic, orthogonally oriented gratings were induced in a way ensuring that one of the two gratings was exclusively dominant during the induction period. Dissimilar monocular AIs engaged in rivalry, as expected, but, surprisingly, the AI induced by the suppressed grating initially dominated. We offer two alternative accounts of this counterintuitive finding, both based on differential neural adaptation.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2005

Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry.

Binocular rivalry occurs when incongruent patterns are presented to corresponding regions of the retinas, leading to fluctuations of awareness between the patterns . One attribute of a stimulus may rival whereas another may combine between the eyes , but it is typically assumed that the dominant features are perceived veridically. Here, we show this is not necessarily the case and that a suppressed visual feature can alter dominant perception. The cortical representations of oriented gratings can interact even when one of them is perceptually suppressed, such that the perceived orientation of the dominant grating is systematically biased depending on the orientation of the suppressed grating. A suppressed inducing pattern has the same qualitative effect as a visible one, but suppression reduces effective contrast by a factor of around six. A simple neural model quantifies and helps explain these illusions. These results demonstrate that binocular rivalry suppression operates in a graded fashion across multiple sites in the visual hierarchy rather than truncating processing at a single site and that suppressed visual information can alter dominant vision in real-time.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Medial rectus pulley posterior fixation: a novel technique to augment recession.

PURPOSE: Medial rectus (MR) pulley posterior fixation, a technique of suturing the pulley to its muscle without scleral sutures, may be as effective as traditional scleral posterior fixation in primary treatment of acquired esotropia (ET) with a high AC/A ratio. This study examines the effectiveness of MR pulley posterior fixation for other variants of ET. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the pre- and postoperative alignment of 16 patients: 9 previously operated patients with excess near ET, 4 patients with sensory ET with excess near ET, and 3 patients with large-angle infantile ET. Surgeries involved extraocular muscle recessions and resections in standard doses combined with MR pulley posterior fixation. RESULTS: All 9 reoperated patients were between 0 and 10 prism diopters of distance ET postoperatively. The excess near ET decreased from an average of 12.1 prism diopters preoperatively (range 6-20) to 1.3 prism diopters postoperatively (range, 0-4). Two of the 4 patients with sensory ET were overcorrected at distance (exotropia of 10 and 15 prism diopters, respectively). The excess near ET of these 4 patients decreased from an average of 13.5 prism diopters preoperatively (range, 10-20) to 2.5 prism diopters postoperatively (range, 0-8). In patients with large-angle infantile ET, the addition of pulley posterior fixation resulted in a greater effect than would be predicted for standard MR recessions, particularly at near. Pooling data for all groups, pulley posterior fixation was associated with a highly significant reduction of excess near esotropia postoperatively (P < 0.00001). DISCUSSION: MR pulley posterior fixation augments MR recession with relatively greater effect at near. Surgical dosage for unilateral recessions and resections combined with MR pulley posterior fixation should be reduced in patients with poor potential for postoperative fusion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Effects of ocular dominance on binocular summation after monocular reading adds.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between ocular dominance and binocular summation with monocular reading adds. SETTING: Department of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan. METHODS: Contrast sensitivities were measured by having subjects view contrast charts at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree after the addition of positive spherical lenses that ranged from +1.0 to +3.0 diopters (D). Through the use of a balance technique, the test group was quantitatively divided into 12 weak and 8 strong ocular dominance subjects on the basis of binocular rivalry. In study 1, binocular contrast sensitivity was measured in the weak and strong ocular dominances by adding a positive spherical lens in front of 1 eye, whereas the other eye was fixed at a corrected distance. RESULTS: In study 1, the binocular summation was observed only after adding positive spherical lenses in the nondominant eye. The differences in binocular contrast sensitivity that occurred after adding a positive spherical lens in the dominant eye versus that seen in the nondominant eye were statistically significant in the strong ocular dominance subjects who had +1.5 D and +2.0 D defocuses (P<.05; analysis of variance). CONCLUSIONS: Binocular summation was effectively maintained with reading adds in the nondominant eye and was significantly influenced by the magnitude of ocular dominance. Evaluating binocular summation after monocular reading adds seems to be a good method to evaluate adaptability to monovision.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Quantitative measurement of ocular dominance using binocular rivalry induced by retinometers.

PURPOSE: To develop a new method using binocular rivalry and retinometers to quantitatively examine ocular dominance and to investigate the magnitude of ocular dominance in cataract patients preoperatively and postoperatively. SETTING: Eye Clinic, Kitasato University School of Medicine Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan. METHODS: The duration of exclusive visibility of the dominant and nondominant eye target in binocular rivalry were measured in 60 healthy volunteers (study 1) and preoperatively and postoperatively in 10 cataract patients (study 2). Rivalry targets were presented directly to the retina of each eye using 2 retinometers. Subjects reported the exclusive visibility of 1 eye target, and the total duration of exclusive visibility for each eye in dominant and nondominant eye trials was evaluated. RESULTS: In study 1, the magnitude of ocular dominance was quantitatively assessed with 4 grades based on differences in total duration of exclusive visibility between dominant and nondominant eyes. In study 2, magnitude of ocular dominance could be evaluated in all cataract patients regardless of refractive and cataract conditions. Magnitude of ocular dominance displayed significant correlations between preoperative and postoperative conditions (simple regression, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ocular dominance can be quantitatively evaluated using this new method based on binocular rivalry and retinometers, particularly in cataract patients. Magnitude of ocular dominance may indicate preoperatively whether a patient with cataracts will have sufficient ocular dominance to adjust to monovision correction.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Spatio-temporal dynamics of the visual system revealed in binocular rivalry.

From the evolutionary viewpoint, animals need to monitor the surrounding environment and capture salient features, such as motion, for survival. The visual system is highly developed for monitoring a wide area of visual field and capturing such salient features. In humans and primates, there is a wide binocular field, suggesting a necessity of integrating the images from the two eyes. Binocular rivalry [R. Blake, A neural theory of binocular rivalry, Psychol. Rev. 96 (1989) 145-167; R. Blake, N.K. Logothetis, Visual competition, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 (2002) 13-21], where incompatible inputs from the two eyes compete to emerge in the subject's visual percept, has been shown to exhibit highly adaptive behavior [I. Kovacs, T.V. Parathomas, M. Yang, A. Feher, When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1996) 15508-15511; N.K. Logothetis, Single units and conscious vision, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 353 (1998) 1801-1818]. Here we investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of the ocular dominance pattern in binocular rivalry under conditions where conflicting salient features were presented in a temporally varying manner. We found a striking example of the detailed structure of the dominance wave propagation, by using a spatio-temporal sampling method. The data show in detail the ability of the visual system to dynamically adapt to the changing stimuli in the context of the massively parallel visual field. We show by model prediction that the globally coherent dominance change in the presence of multiple stimuli can be explained by a mechanism based on local saliency comparison.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2004

Grouping and segmentation in binocular rivalry.

Dichoptic presentation of dot arrays produces binocular rivalry if the arrays are of opposite contrast relative to background. Rivalry can occur even if individual dots in one eye's array do not overlap with the dots in the contralateral eye's array. The amount of unitary perception of only one array is a measure of the probability that the stimuli rival as textured surfaces rather than as portions of arrays or as individual dot elements. In accordance with Gestalt grouping principles, arrays of uniform brightness or color produced more unitary perception than mixed arrays. However, experiments with parametric variation of dot motion coherence suggested that segmentation mechanisms based on detection of collinearity can also influence perceptual selection and suppression in binocular rivalry.

Color Perception↗
PubMed2004

Center-surround interactions in visual motion processing during binocular rivalry.

When each eye is confronted with a dissimilar stimulus, the percept will generally alternate between the two. This phenomenon is known as binocular rivalry. Although binocular rivalry occurs at locations where targets overlap spatially, the area surrounding rivalrous targets can modulate their dominance. Here we show that during binocular rivalry of oppositely moving gratings, a surrounding grating moving in the same direction as one of the two leads to increased dominance of the opposite direction of motion in the center. This increased dominance of the opposite direction in the center was observed irrespective of the eye to which the surround was presented. Inspection of the results for different conditions reveals that the preference for the opposite direction of motion cannot be explained by a single mechanism operating beyond binocular fusion. We therefore suggest that this phenomenon is the outcome of center-surround interactions at multiple levels along the pathway of visual motion processing.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2004

Human observers are biased in judging the angular approach of a projectile.

How do we decide whether an object approaching us will hit us? The optic array provides information sufficient for us to determine the approaching trajectory of a projectile. However, when using binocular information, observers report that trajectories near the mid-sagittal plane are wider than they actually are. Here we extend this work to consider stimuli containing additional depth cues. We measure observers' estimates of trajectory direction first for computer rendered, stereoscopically presented, rich-cue objects, and then for real objects moving in the world. We find that, under both rich cue conditions and with real moving objects, observers show positive bias, overestimating the angle of approach when movement is near the mid-sagittal plane. The findings question whether the visual system, using both binocular and monocular cues to depth, can make explicit estimates of the 3-D location and movement of objects in depth.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

3D flash lag illusion.

Objective of this research is to study the presence of 3D flash lag illusion created by a moving object that has a motion-in-depth and a flash object. An object consisting of two thin sticks was simulated to approach the subject who observed it with a stereoscope. In the process of approaching, another stick was briefly presented in the middle of the moving sticks. Five human subjects took part in our experiments and all perceived 3D flash lag illusion. The perceived depth created by 3D flash lag illusion was measured by two different psychophysical experiments, by use of a vernier caliper and by a method of nulling with another depth cue. We studied relation between the perceived depth and the presentation distance. The experimental results indicate that the perceived gap by 3D flash lag illusion is independent from the presentation distance.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression.

Binocular rivalry elevates contrast increment thresholds for the detection of a transient stimulus presented to the suppressed eye, while thresholds measured during dominance are identical to those during monocular viewing (e.g. [Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 90-94]). It is well established that contrast increment thresholds depend on reference (pedestal) contrast. With high contrasts, increment thresholds increase with pedestal contrast, reflecting a gain control with sigmoidal non-linearity. We examined how this gain control mechanism operates during binocular rivalry (i.e., with and without perception of a pedestal mask). Subjects viewed a horizontal sine-wave grating (steady pedestal) and a radial checkerboard dichoptically. When the grating achieved a pre-specified phenomenal state (dominance or suppressed), subjects initiated the transient presentation (500-ms Gaussian pulse) of a contrast increment of the same spatial frequency. The pulse appeared in either the upper or lower half of the pedestal. Subjects indicated which half of the pedestal contained the pulse. Contrast increment thresholds were measured using a staircase method with various pedestal contrasts, which yielded threshold versus contrast (TvC) functions during dominance and suppression. The measured thresholds were reliably higher during suppression, but the rising slopes of TvC functions did not differ significantly between dominance and suppression (i.e., constant upward shift of TvC function). A control experiment demonstrated that the TvC function during dominance was identical to that during non-rivalry, monocular viewing. Evidently, the contrast gain control for transient luminance increment does not require the perception of pedestal contrast.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2005

A psychoanatomical investigation of the blanking phenomenon.

One cannot detect a white disk located at least 15 degrees from fixation in an intersection of gray alleys that define a grid of black squares. A psychophysical examination of the anatomical locus of this "blanking phenomenon" is reported here. Stimuli were presented dichoptically; disk threshold was measured with fixed-step staircases. Three dichoptic experiments were developed employing different stimuli. Simple dichoptic presentations implied both pre- and post-fusion contributions. One follow-up experiment verified pre-fusion contributions, while another implicated post-fusion mechanisms. These results indicate that the blanking phenomenon has contributions from multiple sites in the visual system.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Visual grouping on binocular rivalry in a split-brain observer.

We studied the effects of visual grouping on binocular rivalry in the left and right hemispheres of a split-brain observer, JW. In Experiments 1 and 2, we compared responses to traditional rivalry stimuli (e.g., a red vertical grating presented to the left eye and a green horizontal grating presented to the right eye) with responses to Diaz-Caneja stimuli (i.e., half of each grating was presented to one eye and the other half to the other eye). As found for intact-brain observers, JW reported episodes of exclusive visibility of coherent stimuli (e.g., of a red vertical grating alternating with a green horizontal grating) with Diaz-Caneja stimuli that were fewer and briefer than with traditional stimuli. This occurred in both hemispheres, demonstrating that during binocular rivalry, contours from one eye can be grouped with those of the opposite eye to create a coherent percept, even in the isolated hemispheres of the split-brain observer. In Experiment 3, we studied the tendency of rivalry in adjacent patches to synchronize. When both patches were in one of JW's hemifields, rivalry synchronized for similarly oriented stimuli, the same as happened for intact-brain observers. When the patches were in JW's opposite hemifields, there was no synchronizing of rivalry, unlike what happened for intact-brain observers. This suggests that rivalry processed in JW's two hemispheres is independent. We conclude that rivalry is processed fully within each hemisphere.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects and ocular prevalence.

QUESTION: How precisely can objects, located in different depth planes, be aligned to the same visual direction? METHODS: Twenty normal observers were presented with vertical Vernier lines at various stereodisparities. They had to judge whether the lower, anterior line was located on the right- or left-hand side of the upper, posterior line. RESULTS: Over a stereodisparity range from zero to 62'', the threshold for detecting a lateral offset between the Vernier lines remained at the "hyperacuity" level of about 7''. With larger stereodisparities, the threshold increased about fourfold, probably due to a mutual, partial suppression of the position signals from the right and left eyes. The reference point from which the observers judged the relative visual directions between stereodisparate objects was not located midway between the eyes; rather, it was often decentred towards the right or the left eye, meaning that the observers had an "ocular prevalence". Their ocular prevalence was, however, not strong enough to have an effect on the Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects. (Under pathological conditions like strabismic amblyopia, one should expect a 100% prevalence of the good eye, implying that the Vernier acuity reaches the monocular level, irrespective of any depth difference between objects.) CONCLUSION: Vernier acuity decreases with increasing stereodisparity. Ocular prevalence, occurring frequently among persons with normal eyes, has no effect on Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects. For a typical everyday viewing condition, the reduced Vernier acuity beyond a stereodisparity of 62'' means that, from a viewing distance of 40 cm, precision mechanics have to guide their instrument as close as 0.4mm to a workpiece, until they can utilise their best position acuity.

Adult↗