Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “VENTILATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1982

Mechanical ventilation in fiberoptic-bronchoscopy: comparison between high frequency positive pressure ventilation and normal frequency positive pressure ventilation.

High frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) was compared with normal frequency positive pressure ventilation (NFPPV) during diagnostic fiberoptic-bronchoscopy. HFPPV was achieved by a simple modification of the Minivent, and gave satisfactory alveolar ventilation and oxygenation. In all 11 patients and over periods of at least 40 min, HFPPV gave normal PaCO2 and high levels of PAO2. Arterial blood pressures were higher and the airway pressures were lower than during NFPPV.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Intermittent self-ventilation in neuromuscular diseases. Comparison of lung function parameters in ventilated and non-ventilated patients].

BACKGROUND: Based on neuromuscular-disease patients in our case, we investigate the possibility of elaborating criteria by which to judge when home intermittent mechanical ventilation should be commenced and to access its consequences over an extended period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out of 24 patients with neuromuscular diseases (6 female, 18 male, mean age 32 years), 14 were treated with IPPV. They were suffering from hypercapnic respiratory failure with heavy sleep disruption and corresponding daily symptoms. RESULTS: The aim was to calculate significant examination parameters to facilitate indication for IPPV. The clinical situation of patients dependent on respiratory support improved under IPPV. We witnessed a "ventilation-saving effect" and--despite progression of the basic disease within the monitoring period--no deterioration of the blood-gas situation. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to elaborate criteria for the indication of IPPV based on our group of neuromuscular-disease patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants.

BACKGROUND: During synchronous ventilation, positive pressure ventilation and spontaneous inspiration coincide. Thus, if synchronous ventilation is provoked, it is likely that adequate gas exchange should be achieved at lower peak pressures, reducing barotrauma and hence airleak and chronic lung disease. Synchronous ventilation can be achieved by manipulation of rate and inspiratory time during conventional ventilation and employment of patient assisted ventilation. OBJECTIVES: To compare (i) the efficacy of synchronized mechanical ventilation, delivered as high frequency positive pressure ventilation or triggered ventilation (patient triggered ventilation (PTV) or synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV)) with conventional ventilation (ii) different types of triggered ventilation SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MESH terms: mechanical ventilation; triggered ventilation; newborn infant); previous reviews, abstracts, symposia proceedings, hand searching of journals in the English language and contacting expert informants. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi randomized clinical trials comparing synchronized ventilation delivered as high frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) or triggered ventilation (PTV/SIMV) to conventional ventilation (CMV) in neonates. Randomized trials comparing different triggered ventilation modes (PTV and SIMV) in neonates. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, airleaks (pneumothorax or pulmonary interstitial emphysema (PIE)), severe intracerebral haemorrhage (grades 3 and 4), chronic lung disease (oxygen dependency beyond 28 days) and duration of weaning/ventilation. Data subdivided into three groups: (i) HFPPV vs CMV; (ii) PTV/SIMV vs CMV; (iii) PTV vs SIMV. Data analysis was conducted according to the standards of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group. MAIN RESULTS: The meta-analysis demonstrates that HFPPV compared to CMV was associated with a reduction in the risk of airleak (typical relative risk 0.68, 95% CI 0.55, 0.68). PTV/SIMV compared to CMV was associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (Weighted mean difference -45.2 hours, 95% CI -78.3, -12.1). PTV compared to SIMV was associated with a trend to a shorter duration of weaning (Weighted mean difference 42.4 hours, 95% CI -9.6,94.4). No disadvantage to HFPPV or triggered ventilation was noted regarding other outcomes. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional ventilation, benefit is demonstrated for both HFPPV and triggered ventilation with regard to a reduction in airleak and a shorter duration of ventilation respectively. In none of the trials was complex respiratory monitoring undertaken and thus it is not possible to conclude that the mechanism of producing those benefits is by provocation of synchronized ventilation. Further trials are needed to determine whether synchronized ventilation is associated with a reduction in chronic oxygen dependency.

Humans↗
PubMed1997

[Cardiopulmonary effects of two modes of mechanical ventilation in dogs with and without acute lung injury-comparison of pressure regulated biphasic airway presure ventilation and intermittent positive pressure ventilation].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cardiopulmonary effect of pressure regulated biphasic airway pressure (BiPAP) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV). METHOD: Airway pressure, hemodynamics and blood gases were measured during the two ventilatory modalities with 0, 0.5, 1 kPa external end-expiratory pressure (EEP) in dogs with and without oleic acid-induced lung injury. RESULTS: No matter whether there is lung injury, airway pressure during BiPAP is lower compared with IPPV, but there is no difference in cardiac output. In dogs with lung injury, PaO2 during BiPAP is higher than that during IPPV. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IPPV, BiPAP effected a decrease in airway pressure, and PaO2 was improved in dogs with lung injury, although the cardiac output was not increased.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Pressure-controlled ventilation versus controlled mechanical ventilation with decelerating inspiratory flow.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether pressure-controlled ventilation offers any advantage with respect to conventional controlled mechanical ventilation with decelerating flow. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study. SETTING: Intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Eleven consecutive critically ill adult patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Study of respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases after 30 mins of pressure-controlled ventilation. Repetition of the same measurements after 30 mins of controlled mechanical ventilation with decelerating flow waveform, with equal tidal volumes, using a commercially available mechanical ventilator. Student's t-test for paired comparisons. A lesser maximum inspiratory flow rate was required for pressure-controlled ventilation (55.7 +/- 16 L/sec) than for controlled mechanical ventilation (72 +/- 2 L/sec) (p < .001). Nevertheless, the peak pressures measured in the orotracheal tubes of the patients were higher in pressure-controlled ventilation (20.4 +/- 3.5 cm H2O) than in controlled mechanical ventilation (18.4 +/- 4.8 cm H2O) (p < .05). This model measured pressure in the inspiratory line, providing erroneous information regarding the behavior of pressures in the airway. The peak pressure measured by the ventilator was significantly higher in controlled mechanical ventilation than in pressure-controlled ventilation and was, in addition, reached at initiation of inspiration in ten of 11 patients with controlled mechanical ventilation, while peak pressure measured in the orotracheal tube was invariably reached at the end of the inspiration, both in pressure-controlled ventilation and controlled mechanical ventilation. The rest of the parameters analyzed, including end-inspiratory pressure, mean pressure, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, and arterial blood gases, showed no differences. The difference between quasi-static compliances almost reached statistical significance (72 +/- 25.4 mL/cm H2O in pressure-controlled ventilation vs. 68.8 +/- 24.3 mL/cm H2O in controlled mechanical ventilation; p = .052). CONCLUSIONS: Our study failed to demonstrate any important difference between pressure-controlled ventilation and controlled mechanical ventilation with decelerating inspiratory flow waveform. The differences in the airway pressures detected by the ventilator are spurious and are due to the place (inspiratory line) where these pressures were measured. The difference between the peak pressure measured in the orotracheal tube has statistical, but not clinical, value and is lower in controlled mechanical ventilation. Based on the limited number of variables we studied and unless the tendency indicated in the quasi-static compliance is demonstrated in the future, we do not believe that pressure-controlled ventilation contributes any uniqueness to the theory or practice of mechanical ventilation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

An evaluation of ventilator reliability: a multivariate, failure time analysis of 5 common ventilator brands.

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical ventilator failures expose patients to unacceptable risks and are expensive. By identifying factors that correlate with the amount of time between consecutive ventilator failures, we might reduce patient risk, save money, and shed light on a number of important questions concerning whether reliability changes as a function of time. OBJECTIVE: Investigate the correlation between several explanatory variables and the time between consecutive ventilator failures and address the following questions: (1) Are ventilators as safe and reliable following repairs as they were before failing? (2) Does reliability change significantly as a ventilator is used or ages? (3) Does a hospital's particular operating environment play a role in ventilator reliability? (4) Are ventilator service contracts worth the money? METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using repair and maintenance records from 2 hospitals: a 570-bed teaching hospital and a 410-bed local community hospital. Records were examined from a total of 66 individual ventilators, of 5 different brands, used between July 1, 1991, and January 3, 2001. The ventilators included 13 Tyco-Mallinckrodt Infant Star, 10 Bird VIP, 11 Bird 6400ST, 16 Bird 8400STi, and 16 Tyco-Mallinckrodt 7200ae. The dependent variable was the operating time between or before unexpected mechanical failures; this was determined by the difference between hours logged on the ventilator hour meter at the time of failure and that recorded when the study began, or when the ventilator was new. Thereafter (when applicable), the time before failure was the difference in hours at consecutive failures. Seven independent explanatory covariates were selected and analyzed as potential correlates with time between failures. Another independent variable, the site of ventilator use (community or teaching hospital), was also tested for significance. Data were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model, the multiple-groups survival statistic, and the Cox-Mantel test. RESULTS: In 2,567,365 hours of ventilator operation, 290 observations were recorded (226 failures and 64 censored observations). Two of the 7 covariates were judged time-dependent, excluded from the Cox model, and evaluated using other techniques. Of the 5 remaining covariates, 2 were significantly related to reliability, both indirectly. There was no difference in reliability, regardless of how many times a ventilator had been previously repaired, but hospital environment did significantly affect reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Ventilator reliability depends on a number of factors. This study indicates that, on average, ventilator reliability improves the more a ventilator is used and the longer the brand has been commercially available. The number of previous ventilator repairs did not affect reliability, but the hospital environment did. These data, if validated, should help to enhance our understanding of ventilator reliability and could eventually have profound economic and safety implications as well.

Contract Services↗
PubMed1996

Effect of conventional mechanical ventilation and jet ventilation on airway pressure in dogs and plastic models with tracheal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of jet ventilation on tracheal stenosis in dogs and plastic models. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial in dogs, and multitrial tests in tracheal stenosis models. SETTING: Animal laboratory in a university setting. INTERVENTIONS: Tracheal stenosis was surgically created around the middle of the trachea. Conventional mechanical ventilation and jet ventilation were compared at the same value of Paco2 in dogs and at the same tidal volume in tracheal stenosis models. SUBJECTS: Twelve mongrel dogs and four types of plastic models with combinations of short or long stenosis and fluid or nonfluid stenosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Canine Studies. Mean peak peak airway pressure values at the distal and proximal portion of the stenosis, and the end-expiratory pressure at the distal portion of the stenosis, were significantly higher during conventional mechanical ventilation than during jet ventilation. The mean values of arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous pressure, and cardiac output did not change significantly between conventional mechanical ventilation and jet ventilation, except for the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure valve. Plastic Mold Studies. peak airway pressure and end-expiratory airway pressure at the poststenotic trachea during jet ventilation with the model lung were significantly lower than during conventional mechanical ventilation. The difference in peak airway pressure, and end-expiratory airway pressure values between jet ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation increased more in short stenosis and nonfluid stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The jet flow that struck the portion of the stenosed wall reversed direction, even during early expiration. Therefore, the expiration during jet ventilation was facilitated more by the reversed flow than by the expiration during conventional mechanical ventilation. This reversed flow may provide lower end-expiratory airway pressure at the poststenotic portion with jet ventilation than with conventional mechanical ventilation. We conclude that jet ventilation was a useful method of ventilation in cases with tracheal stenosis, especially nonfluid and short stenosis.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Sustained inflations improve respiratory compliance during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation but not during large tidal volume positive-pressure ventilation in rabbits.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether volume recruitment maneuvers that induce significant lung reexpansion during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation are also of value during conventional positive-pressure ventilation. DESIGN: Crossover comparison of volume recruitment maneuvers administered during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and positive-pressure ventilation in normal and surfactant-deficient adult rabbits. SETTING: Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Nineteen adult New Zealand white rabbits (weight 2.3 to 3.3 kg). METHODS: Respiratory system compliance was measured plethysmographically before and after sustained inflations in six normal and five saline-lavaged anesthetized rabbits, using both ventilators over a range of mean and end-expiratory pressures. RESULTS: Under conditions where sustained inflations during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation at 15 Hz increased respiratory system compliance 50 +/- 28%, sustained inflations during conventional positive-pressure ventilation at a rate of 30 to 40 breaths/min and tidal volumes of 14 to 17 mL/kg did not change respiratory system compliance (mean change 3 +/- 9%). Sustained inflations during conventional positive-pressure ventilation could not be made effective by increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure level to equal the mean pressure during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Sustained inflations on conventional positive-pressure ventilation remained ineffective up to positive end-expiratory pressure levels of 17.5 cm H2O. In lavaged rabbits, sustained inflations increased respiratory system compliance 49 +/- 14% during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and 0 +/- 3% during conventional positive-pressure ventilation. Sustained inflations increased compliance significantly during conventional positive-pressure ventilation only when ventilating with tidal volumes of 7 mL/kg and low end-expiratory pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Active recruitment of lung volume during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation appears necessary, because small pressure/volume cycles adequate to support high-frequency gas transport are not able to reexpand atelectatic lung units without the aid of a sustained inflation. We conclude that volume recruitment maneuvers improve respiratory system compliance substantially during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation at 15 Hz, but these maneuvers offer potential risk and no benefit during conventional positive-pressure ventilation with large tidal volumes or when using smaller tidal volumes and high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure.

Airway Resistance↗
PubMed1996

Theoretical interactions between ventilator settings and proximal deadspace ventilation during tracheal gas insufflation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the theoretical interactions between ventilator settings, tracheal gas insufflation (TGI), and alveolar ventilation. DESIGN: We derived differential equations governing compartmental volume changes in a one-compartment model of TGI-assisted ventilation and equations governing gas dilution in the airway proximal to the TGI catheter and the additional CO2 clearing ventilation arising from this dilution. This additional ventilation was called proximal ventilation. Validation was conducted in a mechanical lung analog. Model predictions for proximal ventilation were then generated over wide ranges of frequency, duty cycle, and tidal volume. RESULTS: Significant interactions were identified between ventilator settings and proximal ventilation. The persistence of end-expiratory flow from the lung decreased proximal dilution by fresh gas and thereby reduced TGI-aided proximal ventilation. Changes in end-expiratory lung flow resulting from alterations in ventilator settings were correlated inversely with proximal ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: During TGI with constant catheter flow, ventilator settings that promote end-expiratory flow of gas from the lung diminish proximal ventilation. When frequency increases, the decrease in dilution efficiency of the individual breath is partially offset by the increase in cycle number, an effect which is magnified by any concomitant decrease in inspired tidal volume. Prolongation of the duty cycle tends to decrease proximal ventilation. Increases in expiratory resistance, including those arising from the external ventilator circuit or the endotracheal tube, also impair proximal ventilation.

Carbon Dioxide↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The role of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation delivered through a face mask in patients with acute respiratory failure is uncertain. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as compared with endotracheal intubation with conventional mechanical ventilation in 64 patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure who required mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Within the first hour of ventilation, 20 of 32 patients (62 percent) in the noninvasive-ventilation group and 15 of 32 (47 percent) in the conventional-ventilation group had an improved ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2:FiO2) (P=0.21). Ten patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group subsequently required endotracheal intubation. Seventeen patients in the conventional-ventilation group (53 percent) and 23 in the noninvasive-ventilation group (72 percent) survived their stay in the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 1.4; P=0.19); 16 patients in the conventional-ventilation group and 22 patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group were discharged from the hospital. More patients in the conventional-ventilation group had serious complications (66 percent vs. 38 percent, P=0.02) and had pneumonia or sinusitis related to the endotracheal tube (31 percent vs. 3 percent, P=0.003). Among the survivors, patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group had shorter periods of ventilation (P=0.006) and shorter stays in the intensive care unit (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute respiratory failure, noninvasive ventilation was as effective as conventional ventilation in improving gas exchange and was associated with fewer serious complications and shorter stays in the intensive care unit.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

Timing of pressure release affects power of breathing and minute ventilation during airway pressure release ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of interference between spontaneous and mechanical breaths on the power of breathing (rate at which work is done) and ventilatory support during airway pressure release ventilation. DESIGN: Multitrial tests under simulated clinical conditions using a mechanical respiratory system model. SETTING: A research laboratory at a university medical center. INTERVENTIONS: Simulated spontaneous breathing augmented with continuous positive airway pressure and airway pressure release ventilation. Variation in synchrony between spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation was accomplished by adjusting the time lag between detection of the spontaneous inspiration and the airway pressure release from 0 to 3 secs in increments of 0.25 secs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pressures and volumes were measured at the inlet of the lung and chest wall compartment of the respiratory system model. Pressure and volume changes measured at the inlet of the chest wall compartment were used to generate pressure/volume loops and to calculate the power of the spontaneous breathing. Minute ventilation was greater (p < .01) during all airway pressure release ventilation settings compared with those values of continuous positive airway pressure. Nonconflicting airway pressure release ventilation was associated with a higher minute ventilation (p < .001) than asynchronous airway pressure release ventilation. When spontaneous inspiration was synchronous with restoration of continuous positive airway pressure, minute ventilation was lower (p < .001) than during nonconflicting airway pressure release ventilation settings. Power of spontaneous breathing was highest when airway pressure release and spontaneous inspiration coincided, and lowest when spontaneous inspiration and restoration of continuous positive airway pressure were synchronized. Power of breathing was significantly lower during nonconflicting than during asynchronous airway pressure release ventilation (p < .01). No difference was observed between the power of spontaneous breathing and airway pressure release ventilation either with spontaneous expiration synchronized with airway pressure release or with nonconflicting airway pressure release ventilation. When calculated per liter of ventilation, power of spontaneous breathing was significantly lower (p < .01) during all airway pressure release ventilation settings compared with continuous positive airway pressure. CONCLUSION: Asynchronous airway pressure release may increase the power of spontaneous breathing and reduce effective mechanical ventilatory support during airway pressure release ventilation. A clinical study is required to assess the effect of synchronous and asynchronous interference between spontaneous and mechanical breaths during airway pressure release ventilation.

Airway Resistance↗
PubMed1999

Evaluation of a new operating room ventilator with volume-controlled ventilation: the Ohmeda 7900.

UNLABELLED: Changes in fresh gas flow (FGF) during volume-controlled ventilation with the circle system have clinically important effects on the ventilatory variables of children. Current operating room ventilators allow a portion of the FGF to be added to the delivered tidal volume. The Ohmeda 7900 (Madison, WI) ventilator was designed to compensate for changes in FGF. We compared this ventilator with a standard ventilator, the Ohmeda 7000. Twenty patients (13-56 kg) undergoing dental or lower extremity surgery were studied. A side-by-side comparison of the two ventilators was performed using each patient as his or her own control. Beginning with the 7900 ventilator, FGF was set at 3.0 L/min, and the inspiratory to expiratory ratio was set at 1:2. Respiratory rate and tidal volume were adjusted to achieve an ETCO2 of 30-40 mm Hg. After a 10-min period of stabilization, inspired minute ventilation (VI), expired minute ventilation (VE), and ETCO2 were measured. FGF was then increased to 6.0 L/min, and the measurements were repeated after 10 min; FGF was then decreased to 1.5 L/min, and measurements were repeated after 10 min. The patient was then ventilated with an Ohmeda 7000 ventilator, and the sequence was repeated. The Ohmeda 7000 ventilator demonstrated significant changes in VI, VE, plateau pressure, and ETCO2, with changes in FGF (P = 0.0039-0.0001). The Ohmeda 7900 ventilator demonstrated compensation for changes in FGF; there were no significant changes in VI, VE, and ETCO2. We conclude that the Ohmeda 7900 ventilator provides stable ventilatory variables regardless of alterations in FGF (1.5-6.0 L/min). IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we compared the effects of changing fresh gas flow on volume-controlled ventilation using two operating room ventilators (Ohmeda 7000 and Ohmeda 7900). The Ohmeda 7900, but not the Ohmeda 7000, provided stable ventilatory variables with fresh gas flows between 1.5 and 6.0 L/min.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[A study of the parameters of the delivered tidal volume. Ventilation on a lung model using the CICERO anesthetic ventilator].

In many anaesthesia ventilators in common use, the tidal volume delivered is different from the tidal volume preset on the respirator. Tidal volume delivered by mechanical ventilation during anaesthesia may be influenced by fresh gas flow (FGF), the respiratory rate (RR) or the inspiratory: expiratory ratio (I:E). This may cause inadequate hypo- or hyperventilation in small children, especially in newborns and neonates. Using small tidal volumes from 20 to 100 ml preset on the respirator, we investigated in a lung model the tidal volumes delivered by the anaesthesia ventilator CICERO (Dräger, FRG) with variations of FGF, RR and I:E. MATERIAL AND METHODS. The anaesthesia ventilator CICERO (software version 4.16) was equipped with the low-compliance tubes of the "Ulmer Kinder-Set" (Rüsch Co.) and the regular CO2 canister (1500 ml) of the machine. The circuit was connected to a lung model consisting of a glass clyinder filled with copper wool with a compliance of 3.3 ml/mbar. To create a pressure-volume correlation of the entire system, i.e. the lung model, the anaesthesia circuit and the ventilator, calibrated glass syringes were used and the pressure increase in the test lung was measured. This pressure-volume correlation was linear. The pressure increase in the lung model caused by the tidal volume during ventilation therefore reflected the actual tidal volume delivered. The study was performed with small tidal volumes from 20 to 100 ml that could be adjusted exactly on the ventilator. Delivered tidal volumes were studied by varying the FGF from 1 to 6 l/min and the RR from 20 to 60/min (with I:E = 1:1.5) and by varying the RR from 20 to 60/min and the I:E from 2:1 to 1:3 (with FGF = 21/min). RESULTS. By varying FGF, RR and I:E no changes in delivered tidal volumes were noted. In all settings of the ventilator studied, the delivered tidal volume was similar to the desired tidal volume preset on the ventilator. The highest deviation from the delivered tidal volume to the tidal volume preset was 17.5% with a tidal volume of 20 ml. In preset tidal volumes 30-100 ml this deviation was lower than 10%. An intermittent "auto-PEEP" up to 5 mbar was noted during high respiratory rates (50 and 60/min) combined with an I:E at 2:1 and 1:1 or with a FGF at 4 or 6 l/min. The compliance of the ventilator equipped with the circuit was 4.2 ml/mbar. CONCLUSION. The findings in this study prove that with tidal volumes ranging from 20 to 100 ml the actual tidal volume delivered by the anaesthesia ventilator CICERO is equivalent to the tidal volume set on the machine regardless of the variation of FGF, RR and I:E. These findings are mainly based on two circumstances. Firstly, fresh gas flow is fed into a reservoir and not added to the volume delivered by the bellow during inspiration as in many other respirators. Secondly, the CICERO works with a compliance correction function integrated into the machine. Computed compressible volume from the circuit and the ventilator is added to the tidal volume preset on the ventilator; therefore, the volume delivered by the bellow consists of the volume set on the ventilator plus the compressible volume. With these characteristics the anaesthesia ventilator CICERO meets important requirements for a ventilator in paediatric anaesthesia. However, for final assessment further clinical studies are required.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed1994

Automatic selection of tidal volume, respiratory frequency and minute ventilation in intubated ICU patients as start up procedure for closed-loop controlled ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: Before a patient can be connected to a mechanical ventilator, the controls of the apparatus need to be set up appropriately. Today, this is done by the intensive care professional. With the advent of closed loop controlled mechanical ventilation, methods will be needed to select appropriate start up settings automatically. The objective of our study was to test such a computerized method which could eventually be used as a start-up procedure (first 5-10 minutes of ventilation) for closed-loop controlled ventilation. DESIGN: Prospective Study. SETTINGS: ICU's in two adult and one children's hospital. PATIENTS: 25 critically ill adult patients (age > or = 15 y) and 17 critically ill children selected at random were studied. INTERVENTIONS: To stimulate 'initial connection', the patients were disconnected from their ventilator and transiently connected to a modified Hamilton AMADEUS ventilator for maximally one minute. During that time they were ventilated with a fixed and standardized breath pattern (Test Breaths) based on pressure controlled synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (PCSIMV). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements of airway flow, airway pressure and instantaneous CO2 concentration using a mainstream CO2 analyzer were made at the mouth during application of the Test-Breaths. Test-Breaths were analyzed in terms of tidal volume, expiratory time constant and series dead space. Using this data an initial ventilation pattern consisting of respiratory frequency and tidal volume was calculated. This ventilation pattern was compared to the one measured prior to the onset of the study using a two-tailed paired t-test. Additionally, it was compared to a conventional method for setting up ventilators. The computer-proposed ventilation pattern did not differ significantly from the actual pattern (p > 0.05), while the conventional method did. However the scatter was large and in 6 cases deviations in the minute ventilation of more than 50% were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of standardized Test Breaths allows automatic determination of an initial ventilation pattern for intubated ICU patients. While this pattern does not seem to be superior to the one chosen by the conventional method, it is derived fully automatically and without need for manual patient data entry such as weight or height. This makes the method potentially useful as a start up procedure for closed-loop controlled ventilation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants.

We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of high-frequency ventilation with that of conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants. Of 673 preterm infants weighing between 750 and 2000 g, 346 were assigned to receive conventional mechanical ventilation and 327 to receive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was similar in the two groups (high-frequency ventilation, 40 percent; conventional mechanical ventilation, 41 percent; P = 0.79). High-frequency ventilation did not reduce mortality (18 percent, vs. 17 percent with conventional ventilation; P = 0.73) or the level of ventilatory support during the first 28 days. The crossover rate from high-frequency ventilation to conventional mechanical ventilation was greater than the crossover rate from mechanical to high-frequency ventilation (26 vs. 17 percent; P = 0.01). High-frequency ventilation, as compared with conventional mechanical ventilation, was associated with an increased incidence of pneumoperitoneum of pulmonary origin (3 vs. 1 percent; P = 0.05), grades 3 and 4 intracranial hemorrhage (26 vs. 18 percent; P = 0.02), and periventricular leukomalacia (12 vs. 7 percent; P = 0.05). These results suggest that high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, as used in this trial, does not offer any advantage over conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of respiratory failure in preterm infants, and it may be associated with undesirable side effects.

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia↗
PubMed2000

Supraglottic combined frequency jet ventilation versus subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery.

UNLABELLED: We compared the efficacy of gas exchange during supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope and during monofrequent jet ventilation via the Mon-Jet catheter (Xomed, Jacksonville, FL). Twenty-three anesthetized (propofol, fentanyl, vecuronium) patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery were prospectively studied and randomly assigned to one of two groups. The patients' lungs were ventilated with combined-frequency jet ventilation (10 min, 15 and 600 breaths/min, inspiration/expiration time ratio = 1, driving pressure 750-1500 mm Hg), monofrequent (low-frequency group: 15 breaths/min; high-frequency group: 600 breaths/min) jet ventilation (20 min), and again combined-frequency jet ventilation (15 min). PaO(2), PaCO(2), and the inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO(2)) were measured. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was applied. During monofrequent jet ventilation, PaCO(2) increased and the PaO(2)/FIO(2) decreased significantly (P < 0.05) as compared with combined-frequency jet ventilation (low-frequency group: PaCO(2) from 39.4 +/- 3.3 to 50. 8 +/- 8.0 mm Hg, PaO(2)/FIO(2) from 306 +/- 100 to 225 +/- 94 mm Hg; high-frequency group: PaCO(2) from 36.7 +/- 7.2 to 60.3 +/- 6.1 mm Hg, PaO(2)/FIO(2) from 429 +/- 87 to 190 +/- 51 mm Hg; mean +/- SD). After switching back to combined-frequency jet ventilation, PaCO(2) decreased and PaO(2)/FIO(2) increased to baseline levels. We conclude that gas exchange during microlaryngeal surgery can be more easily maintained with supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation than with subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation via the Mon-Jet catheter. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates that the combination of high- and low-frequency supraglottic jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope provides a better pulmonary gas exchange and allows more accurate airway pressure monitoring during microlaryngeal surgery than subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation via an endotracheal catheter.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The effect of helium on ventilator performance: study of five ventilators and a bedside Pitot tube spirometer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess in vitro the performance of five mechanical ventilators-Siemens 300 and 900C (Siemens-Elma; Solna, Sweden), Puritan Bennett 7200 (Nellcor Puritan Bennett; Pleasanton, CA), Evita 4 (Dragerwerk; Lubeck, Germany), and Bear 1000 (Bear Medical Systems; Riverside CA)-and a bedside sidestream spirometer (Datex CS3 Respiratory Module; Datex-Ohmeda; Helsinki, Finland) during ventilation with helium-oxygen mixtures. DESIGN: In vitro study. SETTING: ICUs of two university-affiliated hospitals. METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Each ventilator was connected to 100% helium through compressed air inlets and then tested at three to six different tidal volume (VT) settings using various helium-oxygen concentrations (fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO(2)] of 0.2 to 1.0). FIO(2) and VT were measured with the Datex CS3 spirometer, and VT was validated with a water-displacement spirometer. MAIN RESULTS: The Puritan Bennett 7200 ventilator did not function with helium. With the other four ventilators, delivered FIO(2) was lower than the set FIO(2). For the Siemens 300 and 900C ventilators, this difference could be explained by the lack of 21% oxygen when helium was connected to the air supply port, while for the other two ventilators, a nonlinear relation was found. The VT of the Siemens 300 ventilator was independent of helium concentration, while for the other three ventilators, delivered VT was greater than the set VT and was dependent on helium concentration. During ventilation with 80% helium and 20% oxygen, VT increased to 125% of set VT for the Siemens 900C ventilator, and more than doubled for the Evita 4 and Bear 1000 ventilators. Under the same conditions, the Datex CS3 spirometer underestimated the delivered VT by about 33%. CONCLUSIONS: At present, no mechanical ventilator is calibrated for use with helium. This investigation offers correction factors for four ventilators for ventilation with helium.

Helium↗