Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “State Government”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Fiscal outcomes of the closing of Central State Hospital: an analysis of the costs to state government.

This study reports estimates of the preclosure and postclosure costs of mental health services for patients directly affected by the closing of Central State Hospital. The data come from state budget documents and from the billing records of the community mental health centers serving the discharged clients. On average, it cost Indiana approximately $68,347 (in 1995 dollars) to provide 12 months of state hospital care for this client cohort in fiscal year 1993. In contrast, during the first year following the closure, the average per patient cost to the state was $55,417. When clients were served exclusively in community care settings, the average annual per patient cost was $40,618. The analyses suggest that the closing reduced the costs of caring for this cohort of patients by approximately 18.9%. A significant portion of the cost savings to the state mental health budget was achieved by shifting some of the direct patient care costs to Medicaid/Medicare.

Cost of Illness↗
PubMed2006

Reframing the racial disparities issue for state governments.

Although racial and ethnic disparities in health have been on the federal government's agenda since 1985, no policy reforms have significantly reduced disparities. The question arises whether states can effectively address this issue without waiting for solutions from the national government. The purpose of this article is to propose ways of reframing the disparities issue that might give state policy makers more leverage and might strengthen political will to address the issue. I suggest a moral frame based on a concept of distributive justice in which medical care must be distributed according to need. I explain the rationales for such a frame and consider its strategic advantages and disadvantages. In the last section, I suggest some policies based on this framing that are within the power of state legislatures.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed2006

Predictors of support for environmental tobacco smoke bans in state government.

BACKGROUND: Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is a major threat to public health, associated with a number of serious diseases, and a leading cause of death. Previous research demonstrates that enactment of government policies mandating clean indoor air is effective in creating more smoke-free public places and decreasing the incidence of smoking. Both researchers and community activists have an interest in understanding the factors that predict support for the regulation of ETS. METHODS: This study examined predictors of support for regulating ETS by surveying 684 city and county public officials in Colorado who were interviewed by phone and mail (response rate 61%). RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of public officials reported that it is a "serious" or "very serious" problem that nonsmokers breathe in other people's cigarette smoke, 21% were "neutral," and 42% said that it was "not serious" or "not serious at all." Results indicated that support for policies to control ETS and promote clean indoor air is significantly more prevalent among public officials who: (1) believe that tobacco use is a serious problem in their community, (2) believe that breathing environmental tobacco smoke is a serious problem for nonsmokers, (3) believe that city and county government should get involved with people's decisions about smoking, (4) support smoking-cessation programs for public employees, and (5) have smoked less than 100 cigarettes during their lifetime. CONCLUSIONS: Both the harms of ETS and legislation to create smoke-free environments remain controversial among local officials. Smoke-free advocates should support officials who believe that ETS is a problem and persuade officials on the harms of ETS and the need for government intervention.

Attitude↗