SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Safety Management”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

777 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2·4 mg in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 12): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3b trial.

BACKGROUND: Semaglutide 2·4 mg is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that reduces bodyweight, and provides other cardiometabolic benefits, among people with a BMI at least 30 kg/m2 or at least 27 kg/m2 and with weight-related comorbidities. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of semaglutide 2·4 mg in adults from mainland China and Taiwan with overweight or obesity according to locally defined, BMI thresholds. METHODS: This completed randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group, phase 3b trial (STEP 12) was conducted at 19 sites across mainland China and Taiwan. Adults with a BMI of 24-<28 kg/m2 and at least one weight-related comorbidity, or a BMI of 28-<30 kg/m2, with or without type 2 diabetes, were randomly assigned (2:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg or placebo, plus lifestyle intervention, for 44 weeks. Randomisation was performed by the study sponsor using the Randomisation Trial Supplies Management System. Coprimary endpoints were percentage change in bodyweight and the proportion of participants achieving at least 5% bodyweight reduction. Safety was analysed descriptively in all participants who received the trial intervention. Missing data at week 44 were imputed with washout multiple imputation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06041217, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Sept 15, 2023, and May 7, 2025, of 254 screened participants, 161 (66·5%) of 242 participants were randomly assigned to semaglutide 2·4 mg and 81 (33·5%) to placebo; 121 (50·0%) participants were female, and 47 (19·4%) participants had type 2 diabetes. Bodyweight reduction was greater with semaglutide versus placebo (-12·1% [SE 0·6] vs -2·2% [0·8]; estimated treatment difference -9·9 percentage points [95% CI -11·8 to -8·0]; p<0·0001), with a greater proportion of participants achieving at least 5% bodyweight reduction (80·5% vs 24·4%; odds ratio [OR] 14·8 [95% CI 7·4 to 29·6]; p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 141 (87·6%) of 161 participants in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group and 61 (75·3%) of 81 participants in the placebo group, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common. INTERPRETATION: Semaglutide 2·4 mg provided a superior reduction in bodyweight versus placebo in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity. The safety profile was consistent with the known profile of semaglutide. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. TRANSLATION: For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressings in preventing central line-associated bloodstream infection in a paediatric intensive care unit: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and dermatological safety of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated dressings versus conventional transparent dressings in preventing central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in paediatric patients admitted to a PICU. METHODS: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio was conducted in a tertiary PICU. A total of 250 paediatric patients with a central venous catheter were included (125 per group). Patient characteristics, catheter-related variables, catheter dwell time and skin alterations were recorded. The primary outcome was CLABSI, defined according to CDC/NHSN criteria. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed, including clinically relevant covariates related to catheter exposure, dressing type, and vaccination status. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07175116). RESULTS: CLABSI incidence was significantly lower in the CHG group compared with the conventional dressing group (2.4% vs. 18.4%; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, CHG-impregnated dressings were independently associated with reduced CLABSI risk (OR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.04-0.58). Longer catheter dwell time (OR = 1.13 per day; 95% CI: 1.04-1.22) and absence of complete vaccination (OR = 8.68; 95% CI: 2.48-30.47) were also associated with increased infection risk. Incomplete vaccination showed a similar trend without reaching statistical significance (OR = 6.48; 95% CI: 0.95-44.20). Skin alterations were more frequent in the CHG group (16.8% vs. 11.2%), predominantly in younger infants. CONCLUSIONS: CHG-impregnated dressings were associated with a significant reduction in CLABSI incidence in critically ill paediatric patients, although their use was linked to a modest increase in mild skin reactions. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: CHG-impregnated dressings may be considered as part of a multifaceted infection prevention strategy, alongside appropriate catheter management, minimisation of catheter manipulation and proactive skin monitoring, with cautious and individualised use in infants.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin Reduces the Need for Platelet Transfusion in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Thrombocytopenia.

Chronic liver disease (CLD)-related thrombocytopenia can limit the feasibility of invasive procedures. Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) has demonstrated a favorable safety profile without hepatotoxicity. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rhTPO in patients with CLD-related thrombocytopenia who were undergoing elective invasive procedures. In this multicenter, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 120 adult Chinese patients with CLD-related thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 × 109/L) received rhTPO (n = 80) or placebo (n = 40) once daily for up to 5 or 7 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained platelet counts ≥ 50 × 109/L from 24 h before invasive procedure to 7 days post-procedure, without requiring emergency bleeding management. The primary endpoint was achieved by 85.0% of patients in the rhTPO group versus 12.5% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). Preoperatively, platelet counts ≥ 50 × 109/L were achieved in 92.5% and 20.0% of patients in the rhTPO and placebo groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Platelet transfusion was avoided in 92.5% of rhTPO-treated patients versus 25.0% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.0001). The median duration of platelet counts ≥ 50 × 109/L was significantly longer with rhTPO than with placebo (21.0 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.0007). Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 12.5% of patients in both the rhTPO and placebo groups. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Overall, rhTPO was effective and well tolerated in patients with CLD-related thrombocytopenia and may represent a viable therapeutic option for those undergoing elective invasive procedures. Trial Registration: www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn: number CTR20230919.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Topical Huzhang Sanhuang with Standard Nursing for Chemotherapy-Induced Phlebitis: Randomized Controlled Study.

Chemotherapy-induced phlebitis (CIP) is a common complication of peripheral intravenous chemotherapy that can cause pain, local inflammation, treatment interruption, and diminished quality of life. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the topical Huzhang Sanhuang (HZSH) formula, combined with standard nursing care, in managing CIP. Ninety-four hospitalized patients with CIP (grade I or higher) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either topical HZSH formula plus standard nursing care (experimental group, n = 47) or 50% magnesium sulfate wet dressing plus standard nursing care (control group, n = 47) for 14 days. Prespecified outcomes included phlebitis grade, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), symptom resolution time, and safety indicators. By Day 14, patients in the experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in phlebitis severity than those in the control group (risk ratio for grade ≥ II, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.87; P = 0.012). The experimental group also showed significantly larger reductions in VAS pain scores, hs-CRP levels, and IL-6 concentrations (all P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis further demonstrated faster resolution of multiple local symptoms in the experimental group. Treatment adherence was high in both groups, and no serious adverse events or major safety concerns were observed. These findings indicate that the topical HZSH formula, combined with standard nursing care, is a safe and effective integrative nursing intervention that accelerates clinical recovery, alleviates local symptoms, and reduces the inflammatory burden in patients with chemotherapy-induced phlebitis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Long-term safety of oral orforglipron in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (ACHIEVE-J): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Orforglipron, an oral GLP-1 receptor agonist, requires further evaluation in east Asian populations with type 2 diabetes, given this group's distinct pathophysiological characteristics. This study aimed to assess orforglipron as add-on treatment to diet and exercise alone or to oral antihyperglycaemic medications in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study was conducted in 40 medical research centres and hospitals in Japan. Adults with type 2 diabetes and elevated glucose levels managing their condition with diet and exercise alone or with one or two oral antihyperglycaemic medications were assigned (1:1:1) via computer-generated random sequence to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg). Randomisation was stratified by background therapy, baseline HbA1c (≤8·5% or >8·5%), and metformin use (yes vs no; applied only to α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinedione, and glinides). Investigators, participants, and site staff were not masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was safety for 52 weeks, assessed in all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of orforglipron. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06010004 (ACHIEVE-J). FINDINGS: Between Sept 28, 2023, and June 5, 2025, 450 participants were screened and 401 were randomly assigned to three groups (3 mg, n=132; 12 mg, n=135; and 36 mg, n=134). 352 (88%) completed study treatment. 339 participants (85%, 95% CI 80·7-87·8) had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), more frequently in the 36-mg group (118 [88%, 95% CI 81·5-92·5]) than in the 3-mg (107 [81%, 73·5-86·8]) and 12-mg (114 [84%, 77·4-89·6]) groups. Most TEAEs were of mild (267 [67%, 61·8-71·0]) or moderate (63 [16%, 12·5-19·6]) severity. Discontinuations due to an adverse event occurred in 19 of 134 participants (14%, 95% CI 9·3-21·1) in the 36-mg group compared with seven of 132 (5%, 2·6-10·5) in the 3-mg group and 11 of 135 (8%, 4·6-14·0) in the 12-mg group. Across treatment groups, gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common TEAEs leading to study treatment discontinuation (3 mg: 5 [3·8%, 1·6-8·6]; 12 mg: 8 [5·9%, 3·0-11·3]; and 36 mg: 11 [8·2%, 4·7-14·1]). Level 2 (blood glucose <54 mg/dL) hypoglycaemia events occurred in three of 135 participants in the 12-mg group (2%, 0·8-6·3) and in three of 134 in the 36-mg group (2%, 0·8-6·4) groups. No level 3 (severe) hypoglycaemia events occurred. Outcomes were generally similar across background therapies. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with orforglipron in combination with diet and exercise alone or one or two oral antihyperglycaemic medications for 52 weeks demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes. FUNDING: Eli Lilly. TRANSLATION: For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Adjuvant alectinib versus chemotherapy in resected ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALINA): health-related quality-of-life and safety outcomes from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with resected, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adjuvant alectinib significantly improved disease-free survival versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the global, phase 3, open-label, randomised ALINA trial. We report safety and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes from the ALINA trial. METHODS: Eligible patients aged 18 years or older with resected, ALK-positive, stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC (per the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were randomly assigned (1:1) via a block-stratified randomisation method to receive oral alectinib (600 mg twice daily) for 24 months or intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy for four 3-week cycles. Randomisation was stratified according to disease stage and race. The primary endpoint, previously reported, was disease-free survival. Safety was a secondary endpoint and HRQoL was an exploratory endpoint. Safety was assessed by the investigator as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5·0 until 28 days after the last alectinib dose or chemotherapy cycle. HRQoL was assessed via the Short-Form 36-item health survey version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire at baseline, every 3 weeks to week 12, then every 12 weeks until disease recurrence, consent withdrawal, death, or week 96. Norm-based scoring was applied; clinically meaningful changes were defined using the SF-36v2 manual. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population and HRQoL in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03456076) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2018, and Dec 8, 2021, 257 patients were assigned to receive alectinib (n=130) or chemotherapy (n=127). 123 (48%) patients were male and 134 (52%) were female; 143 (56%) were Asian. The safety-evaluable population comprised 128 patients who received alectinib and 120 patients who received chemotherapy; median duration of safety follow-up was 24·8 months (IQR 22·0-24·9) in the alectinib group and 3·7 months (IQR 3·7-3·8) in the chemotherapy group. The safety of adjuvant alectinib was generally consistent with its known profile. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were blood creatine phosphokinase increased (eight [6%] of 128), alanine aminotransferase increased (two [2%] of 128), and blood bilirubin increased (two [2%] of 128) in the alectinib group, and neutrophil count decreased (12 [10%] of 120), neutropenia (ten [8%] of 120), and nausea (five [4%] of 120) in the chemotherapy group. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (2%; one each with appendicitis and pneumonitis) of 128 patients in the alectinib group and eight (7%) of 120 patients in the chemotherapy group ( most common were gastrointestinal disorders in three [3%] patients). No deaths due to adverse events were reported in either group. There were fewer discontinuations due to adverse events with alectinib (seven [5%]) versus chemotherapy (15 [13%]). A clinically meaningful difference in improvement from baseline was seen at week 12 for bodily pain, role physical, mental health, social functioning, and vitality SF-36v2 domains with alectinib; improvements in physical and mental HRQoL were maintained over 2 years of active treatment (at week 96, mean Mental Component Summary score: 49·9 [SD 10·4]; mean Physical Component Summary score: 48·8 [SD 7·2]) and reached levels similar to the general population (population norm: 50). INTERPRETATION: For patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC, adjuvant alectinib had a manageable safety profile; HRQoL improved and was maintained over 2 years of active treatment. Together with the disease-free survival benefit seen in ALINA, these data support adjuvant alectinib as an important new standard-of-care for patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Intraocular Pressure Changes Following Intraluminal Stent Removal From the Paul Glaucoma Implant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically review and perform a single-arm meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effect of removal of intraluminal stent from the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) on intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and to summarize its long-term efficacy and safety. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Glaucoma remains one of the leading global causes of irreversible vision loss, necessitating effective surgical management for refractory cases. Glaucoma drainage devices are critical for these complex forms, and intraluminal stent removal from the PGI serves as a key strategy to titrate aqueous outflow and optimize long-term IOP control. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, Medline, and CENTRAL. The meta-analysis ultimately included 5 observational studies. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Continuous outcomes (eg, postremoval stent IOP reduction) were analyzed using the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); dichotomous outcomes (eg, hypotony incidence) were evaluated using pooled proportion with 95% CI. All meta-analyses employed a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 5 studies, involving a total of 283 eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that removal of the stent leads to a significant and immediate IOP reduction. The IOP reduction (immediate postremoval stent IOP minus preremoval stent IOP) was significant, with a pooled MD of -9.09 mm Hg IOP (MD = 9.09; 95% CI = [-11.77, -6.41]). In the preremoval stent high-IOP (>21 mm Hg) subgroup, the IOP reduction is -11.82 (95% CI = [-10.14, -13.51]). This reduction was significantly greater than the preremoval stent low-IOP (<21 mm Hg) subgroup, whose reduction is -6.66 mm Hg (95% CI = [-5.55, -7.77]). Regarding safety, the pooled proportion of clinically hypotony was low and highly consistent (I² = 0.00%) at only 0.03 (95% CI = [0.00, 0.15]). CONCLUSIONS: Intraluminal stent removal from the PGI is an effective and safe IOP-lowering intervention. Its IOP reduction effect is significantly more pronounced in patients with preremoval stent high IOP, providing crucial clinical guidance for managing persistently high IOP after PGI implantation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Once-weekly IcoSema versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes management (COMBINE 4): an open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, randomised, phase 3b trial.

BACKGROUND: Stepwise treatment intensification is recommended for managing type 2 diabetes, including insulin initiation when non-insulin glucose-lowering medications are insufficient. Guidelines recommend combining a GLP-1 receptor agonist with basal insulin to improve glycaemic efficacy while reducing weight gain and hypoglycaemia risk. COMBINE 4 evaluated the efficacy and safety of IcoSema, a once-weekly combination therapy of basal insulin icodec and semaglutide (a GLP-1-receptor agonist) versus insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) in people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering medications. METHODS: COMBINE 4 was a 40-week, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, phase 3b trial conducted across 97 sites in nine countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥8·0%) receiving oral glucose-lowering medications were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio without stratification to IcoSema or once-daily glargine U100. The titration target was 3·9-5·0 mmol/L (70-90 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c and the secondary confirmatory endpoint was change in bodyweight, both from baseline to week 40, evaluated in all randomly allocated participants. Adverse events were recorded during weeks 0-45. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06269107) and is complete. FINDINGS: Of 653 individuals screened between Feb 15 and Aug 6, 2024, 151 did not meet screening criteria and 17 withdrew before initiating treatment; 243 were randomised to IcoSema and 242 to glargine U100. Of the 485 randomly allocated participants, 286 (59%) were male and 199 (41%) were female, and median age was 58 years (range 26-82). For HbA1c, from baseline (9·57% for IcoSema and 9·50% for glargine U100), mean change to week 40 was greater with IcoSema versus glargine U100 (-3·32 vs -2·44 percentage points; estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0·88 percentage points [95% CI -1·12 to -0·63]), confirming superiority of IcoSema (p<0·001). From baseline to week 40, mean bodyweight decreased with IcoSema and increased with glargine U100 (-0·79 vs 3·81 kg; ETD -4·61 kg [95% CI -5·46 to -3·75]), confirming superiority of IcoSema (p<0·001). Rate of combined clinically significant (blood glucose <3·0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL], confirmed with a blood glucose meter) or severe hypoglycaemia (severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery) was statistically significantly lower with IcoSema versus glargine U100 (0·29 vs 0·59 episodes per person-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 0·56 [95% CI 0·32 to 0·97]; p=0·04). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported adverse events with IcoSema. INTERPRETATION: Once-weekly IcoSema demonstrated superior HbA1c reduction and bodyweight change, with lower rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia, versus glargine U100, suggesting that IcoSema might be an effective once-weekly treatment option for insulin-naive individuals with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral glucose-lowering medications. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Intimate Partner Violence Training Intervention on Healthcare Providers' Preparedness, Knowledge, and Experiences: A Mixed-Methods Study From Nepal.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) places a considerable burden on health systems globally due to its profound effects on women's health, and women who experience violence often seek care from healthcare providers (HCPs). However, HCPs often lack the preparedness and confidence to respond effectively, resulting in missed opportunities for support and care. This study, conducted in Nepal, evaluated the impact of structured training intervention on HCPs' perceived preparedness, knowledge, and attitudes toward managing IPV and its mental health consequences, including self-harm and suicidal tendencies. The study was nested within a larger cluster randomized trial. A convergent mixed-methods design with a comparison group was conducted among 46 female HCPs in all public hospitals (except one) and 17 primary healthcare centers in Madhesh Province, Nepal. The intervention group (n = 24) received a 10-day intensive IPV and mental health training, while the control group (n = 22) completed 3-day training. Quantitative data were collected using a validated self-administered Physician's Readiness to Manage IPV questionnaire and IPV consequences scale. Paired and independent t-tests were applied to assess changes. Insights from key informant interviews were thematically analyzed to explore participant experiences and perceived impacts. At baseline, over 80% of participants had not received IPV management training. Post-intervention, significant improvements were observed in HCPs perceived preparedness (median change 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1- 2.9), knowledge (median change 2.7; 95% CI: 2.0-3.1), and awareness of IPV consequences (mean difference 1.2; 95% CI: 0.5-2.0), with greater gains in the intervention group. Qualitative findings revealed enhanced confidence in identifying IPV, addressing psychological impacts, and supporting survivors through safety planning and referral. The training significantly improved HCPs' knowledge, preparedness, and confidence to manage IPV and related mental health issues, underscoring the need to scale similar programs to frontline providers, particularly in rural and underserved settings, to strengthen health system's response to IPV.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Suppression of AAV-Delivered Transgene Expression Using Artificial MicroRNAs Delivered by an Alternative AAV Serotype.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene transfer vectors mediate long-term expression in nondividing cells, an advantage for treating chronic disorders. However, current platforms lack a way to selectively shut down transgene expression if adverse effects arise. To create an "off switch," we hypothesized that incorporating unique artificial microRNA (amiRNA) target sequences into an AAV expression cassette would allow subsequent suppression of transgene expression using a second AAV vector encoding the cognate amiRNA. We introduced 22-nt sequences absent from human and mouse transcriptomes into the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of a therapeutic AAV cassette. To identify optimal amiRNAs, two tandem copies of each amiRNA were cloned into the 3'UTR of an mCherry reporter gene. In vitro assessment of six amiRNA/target pairs using a dual luciferase assay identified four amiRNAs that efficiently suppressed reporter expression. Cells cotransfected with target site 3 (TS3) and amiRNA-T3B showed the greatest reduction in luciferase activity (80%, p < 0.0001) and were selected for further study. The "off-switch" system was then evaluated using an AAV5 therapeutic vector expressing a recombinant humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody (AAV5-TBG-anti-IgE-TS3), designed for long-term suppression of allergen-induced reactions. Co-transfection of HEK293T cells with anti-IgE-TS3 and amiRNA-T3B significantly reduced anti-IgE mRNA and protein levels relative to a control amiRNA (p < 0.0001). In vivo testing in Balb/c mice (n = 5) involved intravenous administration of AAV5-anti-IgE-TS3 (3.2 × 1010 gc), followed 4 weeks later by an AAVrh.10 amiRNA vector (AAVrh.10-TBG-amiRNA-T3B; 1 × 1011 gc). Control mice receiving only the therapeutic vector expressed 18.4 ± 13.8 µg/mL serum anti-IgE at 10 weeks. In contrast, mice receiving the amiRNA "off" vector showed marked suppression of anti-IgE (0.3 ± 0.15 µg/mL, p < 0.0001). These findings provide proof-of-concept that AAV-delivered amiRNAs can selectively switch off transgene expression, offering a strategy to improve the safety of AAV-mediated gene therapies.

Dependovirus↗

PubMed2026

Dengue and chikungunya vaccines past, present and future: implications for travelers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Novel vaccines for dengue and chikungunya viruses offer new prevention options against two globally important arboviral diseases. This review summarizes recent developments in vaccine licensure, implementation, real-world experience and research priorities, with emphasis on implications for both endemic populations and travelers. RECENT FINDINGS: Of the three live-attenuated dengue vaccines licensed to date, TAK-003 is authorized in >40 countries and Butantan-DV in Brazil, while manufacturing of CYD-TDV is discontinued. Long-term and postmarketing data continue to refine understanding of serotype-specific protection, waning immunity, and rare adverse events.For chikungunya, two single-dose vaccines are licensed-a live-attenuated vaccine (VLA1553) and virus-like particle vaccine (PXVX0317). Uptake is guided by emerging safety and effectiveness data, with each platform offering potential advantages in different settings.Further data on long-term protection, safety, effectiveness, use in vulnerable populations and integration into outbreak management and immunization systems is anticipated. SUMMARY: Dengue and chikungunya vaccines are increasingly being used in immunization programs and pretravel consultations. Further real-world data are needed-particularly for seronegative dengue vaccine recipients and older, immunocompromised or medically at-risk adults. Research priorities include developing single-dose, nonlive dengue vaccines suitable for high-risk groups, understanding long-term chikungunya vaccine performance, and exploring broader flaviviral or pan-arboviral platforms.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Maternal disease control and pregnancy outcomes with anti-CD20 therapy versus natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Management of multiple sclerosis (MS) during pregnancy requires balancing maternal disease control with fetal safety. Among high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and natalizumab are commonly used in women with active disease, yet their comparative effectiveness and safety during pregnancy remain incompletely defined. This systematic review evaluated maternal disease activity and pregnancy-related outcomes associated with anti-CD20 exposure compared with natalizumab in pregnant women with MS. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through February 2026. Eligible studies included pregnant women with MS exposed to anti-CD20 before or during pregnancy and reporting maternal disease activity compared to natalizumab. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising six observational cohort studies and one pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis. Across studies, anti-CD20 exposure was consistently associated with lower relapse activity than natalizumab, particularly in the postpartum period. Anti-CD20 strategies were also associated with markedly lower postpartum MRI activity and more favorable disability-related outcomes where reported. Meta-analysis of three studies demonstrated a significant reduction in postpartum MRI activity with anti-CD20 therapy compared with natalizumab (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.24; I² = 0%). No clear increase in major congenital anomalies was identified, although some data suggested higher odds of small for gestational age and maternal antibiotic use with anti-CD20 exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-CD20 therapy was associated with lower maternal disease activity than natalizumab during pregnancy, especially for relapse prevention and postpartum MRI suppression. However, evidence regarding fetal and neonatal safety remains limited, warranting cautious individualized treatment decisions and further comparative research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Analgesic effect of premixed nitrous oxide in postoperative rehabilitation for ankle fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of ankle fractures is on the rise, effective postoperative rehabilitation is a crucial aspect of surgical management. However, the occurrence of severe pain during the rehabilitation continues to pose a substantial clinical challenge. METHODS: The study utilizes a dual-arm, single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial design. A total of 100 participants were enrolled. Participants included patients experiencing acute pain (self-reported pain score ≥4) who underwent postoperative rehabilitation for ankle fractures. Participants undergoing rehabilitation training were randomized to receive either 65% nitrous oxide or 100% oxygen. The primary outcome measured was the pain score, while secondary outcomes encompassed anxiety scores, physiological indices, side effects, patient and therapist satisfaction, acceptance, and residual pain. RESULTS: Pain scores were found to be significantly lower in the nitrous oxide group than in the oxygen group (T1: median difference -3.0, [95% CI -3.4 to -2.6]; p < 0.001; T2: median difference -2.0, [95% CI -2.8 to -1.2]; p < 0.001). Compared with the oxygen group, both therapists (p < 0.001) and participants (p < 0.001) in the nitrous oxide group reported significantly higher satisfaction levels. Acceptance rate showed significant intergroup differences (p < 0.001). No severe adverse effects were observed in either group. Anxiety scores between the two groups did not show a significant difference (p = 0.31, η2 = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The safety and analgesic profile of nitrous oxide renders it a suitable option for pain management in postoperative ankle fractures rehabilitation, thus providing a safe and easily manageable alternative to the current available strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn and the registration number is: ChiCTR2400089379.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Sutimlimab for cold agglutinin disease: an updated perspective from approval to real-world clinical treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Sutimlimab, a classical complement pathway (CP) inhibitor, was approved in 2022 in the US, EU, and Japan for the treatment of cold agglutinin disease (CAD), a rare form of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) characterized by CP‑mediated extravascular hemolysis and circulatory symptoms related to IgM‑mediated red blood cell (RBC) agglutination. This review reexamines the clinical trial data and compares those findings with published real‑world experience (RWE), providing clinicians with efficacy and safety data that extend beyond the clinical trial experience in this rare AIHA. AREAS COVERED: The first-in-human trials, the two seminal clinical trials (CARDINAL and CADENZA), and the published post‑marketing RWE are presented. Literature searches for CAD and sutimlimab were conducted in PubMed and in abstracts from ASH and EHA from 2016 to present. All articles and abstracts regarding sutimlimab and CAD were included. EXPERT OPINION: Long-term data from clinical trials and published RWE support the safety and efficacy of sutimlimab. Targeting the CP as primary therapy for CAD offers a unique, targeted management strategy that minimizes exposure to immunosuppressive regimens. The rapid onset of sutimlimab's activity provides a potentially lifesaving treatment option in situations where immediate control of hemolysis is critical. Opportunities remain to increase our understanding of the role of complement inhibition combined with immunosuppressive therapy in CAD. The impact of complement inhibition on morbidity and mortality in CAD remains to be determined.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Intismeran Autogene Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Pembrolizumab Alone in High-Risk Resected Melanoma: 5-Year Update of the Randomized Phase IIb KEYNOTE-942 Study.

Intismeran autogene (intismeran; formerly V940 or mRNA-4157) is an mRNA-based individualized neoantigen therapy. We report 5-year outcomes of intismeran plus pembrolizumab from the phase IIb KEYNOTE-942 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03897881). Eligible patients with resected stage IIIB to IV cutaneous melanoma were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive nine doses of intramuscular intismeran 1 mg once every 3 weeks plus 18 doses of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or 18 doses of intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS); secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and safety. Five-year analyses were descriptive. Among 157 randomly assigned patients (intismeran plus pembrolizumab, n = 107; pembrolizumab, n = 50), the median planned follow-up at data cutoff (December 15, 2025) was 60.3 (range, 50.5-76.4) months. Intismeran plus pembrolizumab continued to prolong RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.510 [95% CI, 0.294 to 0.887) and DMFS (HR, 0.411 [95% CI, 0.200 to 0.843]), with a favorable trend in overall survival (HR, 0.471 [95% CI, 0.165 to 1.345]) versus pembrolizumab. Safety profile continued to be manageable, with no new safety signals. Intismeran plus pembrolizumab was associated with increased T-cell receptor clonality and novel clonotypes versus pembrolizumab; greater novel clone expansion was observed in patients without versus with recurrence in the combination arm. After a 5-year follow-up, intismeran plus pembrolizumab demonstrated sustained, durable treatment benefits versus pembrolizumab alone in resected high-risk melanoma.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Moral of the Story-Perception of Leadership With Moral Distress in Registered Nurses: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

AIM: To understand how Registered Nurses perceive the impact of nursing leadership on managing moral distress and mitigating burnout. BACKGROUND: Moral distress and burnout are pervasive issues in nursing, compromising well-being, patient safety and workforce sustainability. Leadership is a critical factor in shaping workplace culture and mitigating these challenges, yet evidence remains limited. DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was conducted following JBI methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus identified 5927 articles, with two studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and synthesised via meta-aggregation. Confidence in findings was assessed using the ConQual approach. RESULTS: Four major themes emerged: (1) Behind the barriers, (2) Breaking point, (3) Weathering the storm and (4) Leadership for lasting change. Leadership influenced nurses' psychological safety, ethical decision-making and resilience. Inadequate support amplified moral distress, and effective strategies included authentic communication, team solidarity and systemic interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Leadership plays a pivotal role in mitigating moral distress and burnout. Evidence highlights the need for structural changes and support to sustain registered nurses' well-being and retention. RELATIVE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Findings offer direction for leadership strategies that promote ethical workplaces, shared decision-making and mental health supports to enhance resilience and patient care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Strengthening leadership capability is vital for workforce sustainability, care quality and nurse retention. REPORTING METHOD: Authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not involve patients or the public in its design, conduct or reporting.

Leadership↗

PubMed2026

Craniotomy versus Endoscopic Membranectomy in the Treatment of Non-Homogeneous Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Pilot Randomized Parallel-Group Active-Controlled Trial (EMiT CSDH 2).

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a prevalent neurosurgical condition with persistent challenges related to recurrence. Endoscopic membranectomy (EM) has shown promising results in managing symptomatic non-homogenous (SNH)-CSDH, but comparative evidence against craniotomy with membranectomy (CM) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of EM versus CM in managing SNH-CSDH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot randomized parallel-group active-controlled open- labeled superiority trial from September 2023 to November 2024 at Government Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai, India. Sixty patients with SNH-CSDH were randomized into EM and CM groups. Recurrence was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included operative time, complications, radiological indices, pain, hospital stay, and functional recovery. All patients were followed for six months. RESULTS: No recurrence was observed in either group at six months. Two CM patients required reoperation on postoperative day one ( P = 0.15). EM was associated with shorter operative time ( P = 0.02), lower incidence of post-operative subdural residual fluid ( P = 0.015), better early hematoma reduction/subdural space reduction index ( P = 0.008), midline shift/symmetry improvement index ( P = 0.001), and lesser surgical site swelling ( P < 0.001). All patients were ambulant and had a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) 15 at discharge and at six months (including reoperated patients). Pain scores and functional recovery were comparable. EM patients had shorter hospital stays ( P = 0.004) and no significant complications. CONCLUSION: EM demonstrated favorable early radiological outcomes, fewer complications, and comparable functional recovery and recurrence versus CM in SNH-CSDH. Independent reproduction and larger multicentric trials are needed for validity and generalizability.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Unacknowledged Burdens and Clinical Assets of BIPOC Genetic Counseling Students: Qualitative Evidence to Inform Supervision.

As the genetic counseling profession works to diversify its predominantly white workforce, understanding the experiences of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) students is central to equity efforts. While BIPOC students bring invaluable cultural and linguistic diversity that improves patient care, they often navigate clinical training environments that lack diversity and psychological safety. This article draws on data from a longitudinal constructivist qualitative study to examine how racial and ethnic concordance (or lack thereof) with patients and clinical supervisors influenced the clinical training, professional development, and well-being of BIPOC genetic counseling students. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 BIPOC genetic counseling students in the United States and Canada. Interviews were recorded using Zoom.us, transcribed using Rev.com, and analyzed in NVivo using reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis led to the construction of three themes: (1)Shared identity with patients is a clinical advantage: Participants leveraged their cultural and linguistic intuition to establish trust and rapport with patients; (2) Identity navigation involves cognitive and emotional labor: Participants shouldered an unacknowledged burden in managing stereotype threat, overcoming feelings of exclusion, and educating supervisors; and (3) Racial/ethnic identity shapes supervisory dynamics: Participants described BIPOC supervisors as providing identity-affirming support, while some white supervisors avoided discussions about identity or committed microaggressions. These results suggest that BIPOC genetic counseling students have clinical assets rooted in biculturalism, yet carry a burden that often goes unacknowledged of managing power imbalances and pressure to assimilate in predominantly white clinical supervision spaces. To promote equitable training, programs should implement supervisor training on culturally responsive identity broaching, establish independent, transparent mechanisms for students to report biases they encounter in clinic, and expand mentorship networks to provide additional support.

Humans↗