Response of seborrheic dermatitis, dandruff, and pyodermas to a form of sodium sulfacetamide.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The conventional treatment of Nocardia keratitis is with topical sulfonamides. Recently, topical trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim) has been suggested as treatment. This study compares the in vitro efficacy against Nocardia asteroides of Bactrim and various ratios of trimethoprim and a sulfonamide. METHODS: Antibiotic disks were soaked with various ratios of trimethoprim and sulfacetamide sodium. They contained trimethoprim alone, sulfacetamide sodium alone, and both trimethoprim and sulfacetamide sodium at ratios of 1:40, 1:20, and 1:5. Disks containing Bactrim were also prepared. Each disk was placed on blood agar plates streaked with N. asteroides. The plates were incubated at 37 degrees C for 72 hours and then examined. RESULTS: Trimethoprim alone showed minimal effect. Sulfacetamide sodium alone had a clearance zone of 12 mm. The plates of trimethoprim and sulfacetamide sodium at ratios of 1:40, 1:20, and 1:5 had clearance zones of 14 mm, 17 mm, and 27 mm, respectively. Bactrim had a clearance zone of 70 mm. CONCLUSION: Trimethoprim or sulfacetamide sodium alone is not as effective as both drugs together. As the ratio of the two drugs was changed, potency differed against Nocardia organisms. Bactrim was the most effective antibiotic against Nocardia organisms. It should be the recommended agent for the treatment of Nocardia keratitis.
The possibility of using a fluorescent probe technique for the study of drug-providone (I) interactions was investigated. 1-Anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonate (II) was used as the probe. Sulfanilamide, sulfacetamide, and sulfabenzamide were used as the binding competitors. Both sulfacetamide and sulfabenzamide decreased the fluorescence intensity of the I-II complex, while sulfanilamide increased the intensity. The fluorescence depression was greater with sulfabenzamide than with sulfacetamide, indicating that the former is more strongly bound to povidone. Since sulfabenzamide has a greater hydrophobic group (phenyl) than sulfacetamide (methyl), the binding of these sulfonamides to povidone is probably at least partially hydrophobic in nature. The enhanced fluorescence intensity of the I-II complex in the presence of sulfanilamide is believed to involve hydrogen bonding in which the sulfanilamide acts as an intermediary between I and II. Double reciprocal plots for the I-II and sulfonamide-I interactions were employed to obtain a binding constant of 3.2 X 10(4) M-1 for the I-II interaction. The association constants for sulfacetamide and sulfabenzamide were calculated by means of the Klotz equation to be 13.4 and 56.8 M-1, respectively. The povidone molecules appear to have 1.28 binding sites for these compounds under the experimental conditions.
We studied trimethoprim in combination with sulfacetamide and polymyxin B and also in combination with polymyxin B alone (without the sulfacetamide) to determine the efficacy and safety of these new antibiotic combinations in the eyes of patients with bacterial conjunctivitis or blepharitis. Patients were selected for the study if they showed at least three of the following criteria: (1) symptoms of a surface ocular infection; (2) a purulent discharge; (3) a polymorphonuclear neutrophilic response on Giemsa stain; (4) a history of recent exposure to an infected individual; (5) a history of an inadequately treated surface bacterial infection. Trimethoprim-sulfacetamide-polymyxin B and polymyxin B-neomycin-gramicidin (Neosporin, the control) eliminated bacteria from the eyes of patients with conjunctivitis or blepharitis with equal effectiveness. There was no loss of effectiveness when trimethoprim-polymyxin B was compared with trimethoprim-sulfacetamide-polymyxin B, suggesting that the sulfacetamide was not a necessary component. The combination antibiotic containing trimethoprim and polymyxin B appears to be an effective topical antibiotic solution for the treatment of ocular surface infections.