SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Recovery Room”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
[Nitrous oxide exposure to personnel in a recovery room with modern climate control].
Epidemiologic studies have shown that trace concentrations of inhalation anaesthetics polluting the air of operating theatres could have deleterious effects on the personnel's health. Nitrous oxide (N2O) oxidises vitamin B12 and thus decreases DNA production by inactivation of methionine synthase. Therefore, the United States and most European health authorities recommend threshold values to protect against potential health risks. These values range from 25 to 100 ppm, expressed as time-weighted averages (TWA). There is a lack of data concerning measurements of trace concentrations under defined conditions. The aim of this study was to quantify levels of N2O in a recovery room (RR) with an air conditioning system. METHODS. Trace concentrations of N2O were determined in the main RR of the University Hospital of Regensburg (Germany). Measurements were taken for 5 days from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Trace concentrations of N2O were measured directly by means of a highly sensitive photoacoustic infrared spectrometry analyser. The lower detection limit was 0.03 ppm. Samples of room air were taken continuously from six different places in the recovery room, five of which had a distance of 50 cm to the patients' heads. One point represented the nurses' desk 5 m away from the patients. TWAs were calculated for each day and location. RESULTS. All values were below 5 ppm TWA at each location. Typical TWA (range) values recorded at day 2 were for point 1:3.5 ppm (0.4-8.9), point 2:3.2 (0.5-7.3), point 3:3.0 (0.5-5.4), point 4:3.7 (0.5-21.2), point 5:3.2 (0.6-6.6), and at the nurses' desk 3.3 (0.5-6.3). Peak concentrations of nearly 25 ppm were reached for at least 10 min. Significant differences between the days and locations could not be found (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSION. Exposure to N2O in a climatised RR is determined by several factors: (1) efficacy of air conditioning, with 10.7 changes per hour without recirculation; (2) recovery room size; (3) transport of the patients takes about 15 min, during which some quantities of N2O leave the patient; and (4) high numbers of patients staying 2 and more hours in the recovery room and exhaling smaller concentrations of N2O into the room air. Because of these factors, all measured values are significantly below the standard international threshold values. Under other conditions of room design, such as ventilation and size, measured values may be higher.
[Treatment of postoperative pain in children in the recovery room. Use of morphine and propacetamol by the intravenous route].
The analgesic efficiency of morphine and propacetamol for postoperative pain, in the recovery room, was studied in two groups of children, who had undergone either orthopedic or visceral surgery. An injection of 50 mcg/kg of morphine chlorhydrate was given to the first group of 239 children ASA I, who were admitted to the recovery room and who presented signs of severe pain (agitation, crying, complaining). The analgesic efficiency of morphine was judged on physiological criteria (blood pressure, heart rate) and on behavioral criteria (calming of the child). No incidents were noticed. A second study was then performed on a second group of 100 children ASA I, who received 15 mg.kg-1 of propacetamol as an intravenous perfusion for 15 minutes. The analgesic efficiency of propacetamol was judged on behavioral criteria alone. In the morphine group, 67% of the children was calmed following one injection (94% after a second injection given 15 minutes after the first). In the propacetamol group, 77% of the children were calmed. Propacetamol was insufficient for the pain in 23% of the cases but one subsequent injection of morphine was always sufficient to calm the child. These two successive studies show the need for an analgesic protocol for children in the recovery room. Propacetamol should be administered first and then, if insufficient, followed by only one injection of morphine. This protocol of propacetamol and morphine seems to be satisfactory and thus avoids all pernicious side effects.
Routine recovery room radiographs after total hip arthroplasty: ineffective for screening and unsuitable as baseline for longitudinal follow-up evaluation.
To assess the usefulness of traditional recovery room check radiographs after total hip arthroplasty, we retrospectively analysed 2,065 consecutive hip arthroplasty patients. We found a 0.1% rate of radiologic diagnosis of dislocation in the population screened. In 100 patients randomly selected for comparison, the image quality in the recovery room radiographs was significantly inferior to standardized departmental radiographs (P<.001), with further significant differences between cup version (P<.001), and stem alignment assessments (P=.002). We found good agreement between the authors in the assessments of these radiographs with a weighted kappa statistic of 0.8653 (P<.0001). Seven recovery room radiographs needed repetition for poor quality versus none of the departmental films (P=.007). With such poor information and diagnostic yield for follow-up and screening, these investigations should only be performed when clinically indicated.
[A survey of operating and recovery room ventilators and monitoring equipment as well as their maintenance].
OBJECTIVE: To survey the monitoring and anaesthetic devices available in a sample of French hospitals and the modalities of their maintenance. STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD: Survey carried out in 21 private and public hospitals (including eight university hospitals), affilated to the French Association for Research in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ARAR). RESULTS: More than 84% of all operating theaters were equipped with at least an ECG, a SpO2, and a non invasive blood pressure monitor. The non equipped anaesthesia sites were mainly delivery rooms, plaster cast rooms and X-ray rooms. The figure of recovery room beds was, generally speaking in accordance with the French recommendations. Maintenance policy was not systematic and not budgeted in 72% of the surveyed centres. CONCLUSION: The equipment in most anesthetic sites has significantly increased, however maintenance policy remains still heterogenous.
The role of the recovery room for the safety of anesthesia.
Three groups of activities taking place in the recovery room are separately analyzed and compared with the same done on the wards. It is concluded that all three of them are preferably done in the recovery room. When these principles are followed, mortality in the direct postoperative period can be reduced to an absolute minimum. Data from 50,000 cases confirmed this statement.
Decreases in arterial oxygen saturation in paediatric outpatients during transfer to the postanaesthetic recovery room.
Arterial oxygen saturation was measured by pulse oximetry in two groups of paediatric outpatients breathing room air during transport from the operating room to the postanaesthetic recovery room. In Group I (n = 60) readiness for transfer from OR to PARR was decided clinically. In Group II (n = 50) additional criteria of oxygen saturation (SaOe) greater than or equal to 98 per cent with end-tidal gas N2O less than or equal to 10 per cent and CO2 less than or equal to 45 mmHg were met. A higher incidence of desaturation (SaO2 less than or equal to 90 per cent) occurred in Group I (27 per cent) than in Group II (eight per cent) (P less than 0.05). More children under 2 yr desaturated in Group I (50 per cent) than Group II (17 per cent) (P greater than 0.05 less than 0.10). Twenty-two patients in each group had a recent history of upper respiratory tract infections. In these patients, desaturation was more marked in those in Group I (32 per cent) than in Group II (five per cent) (P less than 0.05). Within each group, the incidence of desaturation during transport was similar in patients with or without a recent URI.
Does your hospital need a recovery room?
In a survey made to estimate the need for a special room in which patients could recover from anesthesia after operation, it was found that of 475 cases in which this service might have been used, it would have been desirable in 296; that recovery room care would probably have relieved ward nurses of the duty of special care during their busiest hours; that recovery room care was indicated in a high percentage of cases in which certain anesthetics were employed, and that the need for recovery room care appeared to increase in proportion to the amount of pre-sedation given.
[Excessive nitrous oxide exhalation by postoperative patients in the recovery room].
Expired nitrous oxide from patients in the recovery room is considered to be the major source of air pollution. We measured expired concentrations of nitrous oxide in three patients and three volunteers. After only 5 minute inhalation of 50% nitrous oxide, it took over 2 hours for exhaled N2O concentration to decrease to 25 ppm in volunteers and after 30 minute inhalation, it took over 4 hours. The patients inhaled 50% nitrous oxide for 60, 165, 150 minutes, respectively and all patients expired nitrous oxide, the concentrations of which exceed 100 ppm over 3 hours. As to the patient who inhaled nitrous oxide for 150 minutes, expired nitrous oxide over 25 ppm was detected 10 hours after the end of anesthesia, and it was 4 ppm even after 20 hours. Any personnel including anesthesiologists and nurses working in the operating room can be exposed to high concentrations of nitrous oxide exceeding the permissible limit of 25 ppm, whenever they take care closely of their patients. We do not have any effective measures to protect us from this kind of air pollution except employing total intravenous anesthesia.
Residual curarization in the recovery room after vecuronium.
We have investigated residual block after anaesthesia which included the use of the neuromuscular blocking agent vecuronium but no anticholinesterase, in 568 consecutive patients on admission to the recovery room. The ulnar nerve was stimulated submaximally using TOF stimulation (30 mA). Postoperative residual curarization was defined as a TOF ratio < 0.7. Of the 568 patients, 239 (42%) had a TOF < 0.7 in the recovery room. These patients had received a larger cumulative dose of vecuronium than patients who had full recovery (mean 7.7 (SD 3.6) mg vs 6.2 (2.7) mg; P < 0.05) and a shorter time had elapsed since the last vecuronium dose (117 (70) min vs 131 (80) min; P < 0.05). Of 435 patients whose trachea was extubated, 145 (33%) exhibited inadequate recovery from neuromuscular block. Six of these had one or no response to TOF stimulation and were reintubated. In the remaining 139 patients, neuromuscular block was successfully antagonized. Only 20 patients (3.5%) remembered TOF stimulation when questioned 2 h later in the recovery room, and discomfort associated with it was assessed using a visual analogue scale before discharge. We conclude that it is necessary to antagonize residual block produced by vecuronium.
Clinical indicators and other complications in the recovery room or postanaesthetic care unit.
Clinical indicators and complications occurring in the recovery room or post anaesthetic care unit were recorded for patients who had an anaesthetic procedure during 1995, 1996 and 1997 (n = 13 266). Clinical indicators measured were those developed by the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards in conjunction with the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, and three other indicators. All patients were assessed and positive data were collected by nursing staff on a standardised form which was checked and collated by the anaesthetist responsible for the recovery room (the author). The rates for some indicators were higher than the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards 1997 rates, but the overall rates of complications were comparable with, or lower than, those in published series. Clinical indicator data are seen as a valuable quantitative tool for quality assurance, particularly if collected as part of a more comprehensive programme.
Postoperative-postanesthetic recovery rooms; a report on three years of experience.
An analysis of the three-year experience of the recovery room at the Cedars of Lebanon Hospital emphasized the importance of this phase of postoperative care. Closer observation and supervision of the patient is provided during a critical period, and specialized nursing care is constantly available. Supportive and corrective therapy can be carried out immediately by the cooperative efforts of the anesthesiologist and surgeon, who are close by. The completely equipped and properly staffed recovery room is the best assurance for reducing postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Level of consciousness on arrival in the recovery room and the development of early respiratory morbidity.
An audit review of 16,065 patients undergoing operative procedures under general anaesthesia was carried out to examine the relationship between early postoperative respiratory complications and the level of consciousness of patients on arrival in the recovery room. In patients aged over ten years, the incidence of respiratory complications was significantly (P less than 0.005) related to the level of consciousness independent of ASA grade or age. Since the level of consciousness of patients arriving in the recovery room could be modified by changes to anaesthetic practice it is concluded that a significant reduction in respiratory complications might be possible if anaesthetists used general anaesthetic techniques which returned patients awake to the recovery room.
[A survey on recovery rooms of French university hospitals and Ile de France hospitals].
This study reports the results of a survey of post-anaesthesia recovery rooms (PARR) in French public University Hospitals (UH), and in those of the "Ile de France" (IdFH) area. The study, carried out between the 2nd and 8th of April 1990, aimed to identify the place where patients recovered from anaesthesia, and the personnel and monitoring equipment available in these places. 90% of 55 departments of anaesthesia and intensive care in University Hospitals and 94% of 34 departments in "Ile de France" Hospitals responded. A total number of 20,567 patients was collected, with 10,027 from University Hospitals. Of the latter, 31.4% recovered in the operating room or in the anaesthetic room itself; 7.5% were directly transferred to an intensive care unit (ICU), and 61.1% (10,397) were admitted to a PARR. However, 2,460 of those admitted to such a PARR were in fact admitted to a PARR without any permanent nursing staff. Overall, 45.8% of the patients were not admitted to a PARR where adequate care by nurses was available. Of the 3,540 patients anaesthetized in "Ile de France" Hospitals, 3.1% were transferred to an ICU, 25% were not admitted to a PARR, and the remaining 71.7% were. However, 35% of those admitted to a PARR were admitted to a PARR without any permanent nursing staff. Therefore 50.1% of patients anaesthetized in the "Ile de France" Hospitals did not benefit from adequate post-anaesthetic supervision. In 82% of the patients anaesthetized in University Hospitals, the lowest rates of admission to a PARR were found in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE), and ENT, ophthalmological or stomatological surgical procedures. After anaesthesia for GIE, 69% of patients recovered at the anaesthetic post and 12% were admitted to a PARR without any permanent nursing staff. In ENT-Ophthalmology-Stomatology, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Radiology departments, 56%, 69% and 69% of patients, respectively, recovered in the anaesthetic room or in a PARR without any permanent staff, or, for the Radiology and Obstetrics departments, sent straight back to their room. Similar results were obtained with the patients in the "Ile de France" Hospitals. Nurses were not always present in 37% and 24% of PARR in University and "Ile de France" Hospitals respectively. In the PARR, there were three ECG monitors for 4 beds, and one pulse oximeter for seven beds. It seems therefore that, despite several ministerial recommendations, not all anaesthetized patients are admitted to a recovery room after their anaesthetic.
Influence of motivation of care providers on the incidence of postoperative hypoxaemia in the recovery room.
We have studied the influence of motivation of care providers on the incidence and duration of postoperative hypoxaemia in the recovery room. In a prospective, switch-back designed cohort study, we have compared the incidence of low pulse oximeter saturation values (SpO2) during pre-intervention, intervention and post-intervention phases. Low SpO2 values were classified as either hypoxaemia (SpO2 < or = 90%, minimum duration 1 min) or artefact. Pulse oximetry trend data from 1350 patients, 450 in each group, were analysed. During the intervention phase, motivation was increased by adding an explicit instruction to prevent and treat low SpO2 values and making personnel aware that they were being studied (Hawthorne effect). The incidence of hypoxaemia decreased significantly from 17.8% during the pre-intervention phase to 11.6% during the intervention phase (relative risk (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.90; P < 0.01). The incidence of severe hypoxaemia (SpO2 < or = 85%, 1 min) decreased from 7.8% to 3.3% (RR 0.43, CI 0.24-0.76; P < 0.01). The number of patients who had severe hypoxaemia for more than 5 min decreased from 13 to 1 (RR 0.08, CI 0.02-0.36; P < 0.01). In the post-intervention period, the incidence of hypoxaemia returned to pre-intervention values. The results of this study suggest that motivation of care providers to prevent and treat low SpO2 is an important determinant of postoperative hypoxaemia in the recovery room.
Recovery room incidents: a review of 419 reports from the Anaesthetic Incident Monitoring Study (AIMS).
Four hundred and nineteen incidents that occurred in the recovery room were extracted from the Anaesthetic Incident Monitoring Study database, representing 5% of the total database of 8372 reports. Incidents were reported mainly in daylight hours, with over 50% occurring in ASA 1-2 patients. The most common presenting problems related to respiratory/airway issues (183; 43%), cardiovascular problems (99; 24%) and drug errors (44; 11%). One hundred and twenty-two events (29%) led to a major physiological disturbance and required management in the High Dependency Unit or Intensive Care Unit. Contributing factors cited included error of judgement (77; 18%), communication failure (57; 14%) and inadequate pre-operative preparation (29; 7%), whilst factors minimising the incident included previous experience (97; 23%), detection by monitoring (72; 17%) and skilled assistance (54; 13%). Staffing and infrastructure of the recovery room needs to be supported, with ongoing education and quality assurance programmes developed to ensure that such events can be reduced in the future.
[The recovery room - function and organization (author's transl)].
Postanaesthetic observation and control of the patient, independently of surgery, is an integral part of the anaesthetic course. The anaesthetic procedure is terminated in the recovery room only, where all negative effects of anaesthesia and surgery or their sequels can be properly assessed and eliminated. After restoration of vital functions and protective reflexes only the patient may be transferred to normal wards or intensive care units for further control of his postoperative condition. Following long-term surgery, and in any high-risk case in general, postoperative mechanical ventilation or application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can reduce the incidence of respiratory complications. The additional and extensive therapeutic and diagnostic tasks to be covered in the recovery room call for special consideratons in equipping and staffing. Adequately trained nurses in sufficient number, respiratory devices covering any mode of ventilation and an emergency laboratory are indispensable prerequisites for proper function. Only then the anaesthesiologist will be able to satisfactorily perform his comprehensive task of providing stable vital functions, preoperatively in establishing the state of operability, intraoperatively by corrective therapy and postoperatively until anaesthetic effects and surgical trauma have subsided.