Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Rapid Genetic Testing”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Genetic testing and the clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988: present and future.

CLIA '88 superseded CLIA '67. CLIA '88 set standards designed to improve quality and expanded federal oversight to virtually all clinical laboratories in the United States. Presumably because genetics testing was then in its infancy, CLIA '88 did not devote a special section to genetics testing. Biochemical and immunochemical tests used to evaluate inborn errors of metabolism and other genetic entities were categorized as analytes in the Clinical Chemistry section, and DNA probes used primarily in infectious disease were included in Microbiology. The legal, social, economic, and ethical implications of genetic testing and the rapid commercialization of these tests led to recommendations that genetic testing be defined as a laboratory specialty with a subsection in CLIA. The advisory committee created under CLIA was assigned to review these recommendations. The committee agreed that genetics testing was sufficiently different from other areas already included in CLIA to warrant a separate section. Two definitions were adopted. The more clear-cut one is for molecular genetic and cytogenic tests. This includes the analysis of human DNA/RNA in evaluating genetic diseases. The second definition is not as clear-cut and is for the analysis of proteins and metabolites used predominantly to detect inborn errors of metabolism. Many of these analytes already are categorized according to their uses for other purposes. The recommendations for genetic testing include detailed and specific proposals concerning personnel, confidentiality and informed consent, quality control, contamination, proficiency testing, validation of tests, special reporting, retention of records, and reuse of tested specimens.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗
PubMed2002

Advise or consent? Issues in genetic testing of adolescents.

Medical genetics is a rapidly advancing field, and genetic testing is becoming readily accessible as well as more sophisticated. Genetic testing has the potential to be both harmful and beneficial in terms of physical, psychosocial, and reproductive health. Ethical and legal implications of genetic testing are profound and particularly confounding in children and adolescents. This chapter discusses points to consider in evaluating the potential benefit and harm of the decision to undergo testing in adolescence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

[Transcriptional abnormalities and genetic testing].

There is a rapidly growing literature on transcription abnormalities, e.g. differential expression of alleles and the role of some single nucleotide polymorphisms in altering splicing patterns. An average 10% of splicing mutations is reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database but this figure could climb to 50% for some genes such as NF1 or ATM. This paper therefore aims at clarifying some important aspects of transcriptional abnormalities in genetic testing. The main types of alterations are presented, i.e. exonic, intronic and promoter modifications that could modify or create consensus motif and/or secondary structures. DNA, RNA based-diagnostic strategies and in silico tools are then presented and their performances and limitations outlined to build up a picture of the current state of the art.

DNA↗
PubMed2004

The role of genetics in pediatric endocrinology.

Information on the genetics of endocrine disorders and genetic testing is increasing rapidly. This makes it important for endocrinologists to be able to efficiently search for clinically relevant information and to access specialized laboratory testing and genetics professionals to assist with diagnosis, education, counseling and management of patients and families. Because new findings are reported in many different publications, current comprehensive information on clinical and laboratory findings of and genetic testing for endocrine disorders cannot be found in any single journal or text. Electronic databases provide rapid access to such information. Endocrinologists need to develop a working understanding of these databases. This review examines principles of inheritance, types of genetic variation and the genetic aspects of selected endocrine disorders. It demonstrates how information on genetics and genetic testing can be obtained and discusses how endocrinologists and geneticists can work together to strengthen the clinical applications of genetics to pediatric endocrinology.

Child↗
PubMed2002

[Predictive genetic testing - change in paradigms for prevention and health care?].

The post-genomic era promises to offer new insights into the nature of disease, its prevention, and treatment. But now that there is a draft code of the human genome, what does this knowledge mean and how might it be applied? How to use genetic information to promote health and prevent disease - the fundamental mission of public health - will be one of the most challenging tasks in future. Assessing the benefits and risks of predictive genetic testing and the efficacy of early interventions as well as exploring complex issues that have emerged (e. g., rapid commercialization of genetic tests, availability of and access to interventions, and potencial discrimination) call for public health leadership.

Forecasting↗
PubMed2000

Interlaboratory comparison of the CB6F1-Tg rasH2 rapid carcinogenicity testing model.

Several genetically engineered mouse models are currently being examined for potential use in cancer hazard identification. We have undertaken an interlaboratory comparison of the performance of the CB6F1-Tg rasH2 transgenic mouse in cancer bioassays concurrently conducted in the United States and Japan. Chemicals selected for study included known human carcinogens (melphalan and cyclosporin A) and known rodent carcinogens (p-cresidine and vinyl carbamate) tested at carcinogenic doses, and non-carcinogens (p-anisidine and resorcinol) tested at appropriate high doses. Because of abdominal adhesions caused by the intraperitoneal dosing vehicle, melphalan was excluded from the study results. The remaining five studies showed similar results between the two laboratories conducting each study. Vinyl carbamate gave the strongest positive response inducing lung adenomas and carcinomas and splenic hemangiosarcomas. p-Cresidine was considered positive for urinary bladder transitional neoplasia. Cyclosporin A, p-anisidine, and resorcinol were negative in all studies. Although only five chemicals were successfully tested in this interlaboratory comparison, there was good concordance in outcome for the strong carcinogens and for the non-carcinogens. Successful testing of chemicals with less carcinogenic potential may require modifications in study design to include more animals and longer study duration.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2002

What does my doctor think? Preferences for knowing the doctor's opinion among women considering clinical testing for BRCA1/2 mutations.

The traditional emphasis on nondirectiveness in genetic counseling has become increasingly controversial with the rapid expansion of genetic testing in clinical medicine. This study was done to determine whether women considering clinical testing for BRCA1/2 mutations want to know their health care providers' opinions about whether or not they should undergo testing. Participating in the study was a retrospective cohort of 335 women who participated in a university-based clinic offering breast cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling, and BRCA1/2 testing between January, 1996, and April, 1998. A total of 242 women (77%) wanted to know if the doctors at the Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Evaluation Program (BCREP) thought they should be tested, 28 women (9%) were unsure, and 46 women (14%) did not want a BCREP doctor's opinion on testing. A total of 158 women (49%) wanted to know if their primary doctor thought they should be tested, 31 women (10%) were unsure, and 130 women (41%) did not want to know. Desire to know the opinion of the BCREP doctors was inversely associated with having undergone BRCA1/2 testing (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95) and having a breast cancer diagnosis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99). Desire to know their primary doctor's opinion was inversely associated with having undergone BRCA1/2 testing (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.92). Our study suggests that over three-quarters of women who considered clinical testing for BRCA1/2 mutations wanted to know the opinions of the cancer genetics doctors and almost half wanted to know their primary doctor's opinion about whether or not they should undergo testing. These results support the use of models of genetic counseling that allow for sharing the health care providers' opinions when desired by the patient.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1998

[Clinics for counseling on cancer genetics. Experiences with genetic studies and counseling on familial breast cancer and colorectal cancer].

Five to ten percent of cases of breast cancer and colorectal cancer are familial. These families can be divided into high-risk families and moderate-risk families. Cancer in high-risk families can often be explained by dominant inheritance of a gene causing increased susceptibility to cancer. There is a great demand for genetic counseling in these families, and the structure of and experiences from a familial cancer clinic at Odense University Hospital is described. The establishment of a familial cancer clinic involves three steps: 1) Identification of families with increased cancer susceptibility; 2) Molecular tests to identify gene carriers; 3) Clinical examinations for early detection of tumors. Achievement of these three steps requires the involvement of several medical specialties to ensure patient care. Experience with familial cancer clinics is still limited and the involvement of genetic testing and clinical examination programs at risk individuals are insufficiently examined. The rapidly improving techniques for genetic testing make it urgent that it is implemented as part of already established clinical programs.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Developing a sustainable process to provide quality control materials for genetic testing.

PURPOSE: To provide a summary of the outcomes of two working conferences organized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to develop recommendations for practical, sustainable mechanisms to make quality control (QC) materials available to the genetic testing community. METHODS: Participants were selected to include experts in genetic testing and molecular diagnostics from professional organizations, government agencies, industry, laboratories, academic institutions, cell repositories, and proficiency testing (PT)/external Quality Assessment (EQA) programs. Current efforts to develop QC materials for genetic tests were reviewed; key issues and areas of need were identified; and workgroups were formed to address each area of need and to formulate recommendations and next steps. RESULTS: Recommendations were developed toward establishing a sustainable process to improve the availability of appropriate QC materials for genetic testing, with an emphasis on molecular genetic testing as an initial step. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the availability of appropriate QC materials is of critical importance for assuring the quality of genetic testing, enhancing performance evaluation and PT/EQA programs, and facilitating new test development. To meet the needs of the rapidly expanding capacity of genetic testing in clinical and public health settings, a comprehensive, coordinated program should be developed. A Genetic Testing Quality Control Materials Program has therefore been established by CDC in March 2005 to serve these needs.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗
PubMed2026

Genetic testing practices across European epilepsy centers: An ERN EpiCARE survey.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic testing plays an increasing role in the diagnostic pathway for rare and complex epilepsies. However, significant heterogeneity persists in access, implementation, and interpretation across Europe. This study aimed to assess genetic testing practices, accessibility, and challenges across expert epilepsy centers within the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (ERN EpiCARE) and to identify key challenges and areas for harmonization. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was developed by the ERN EpiCARE Clinical Genetics Working Group and distributed to 50 EpiCARE member centers across 27 European countries. The questionnaire collected quantitative and qualitative information on available genetic testing modalities, turnaround times, use of rapid testing, multidisciplinary team (MDT) organization, genetic counseling practices, and perceived challenges. Survey findings were complemented by a structured discussion held during the ERN EpiCARE General Assembly. RESULTS: Responses were received from 46 centers (51 responses). Most centers reported access to genetic testing, predominantly through in-house facilities. Whole-exome sequencing was available in 85% of centers, and gene panels were available in 78%. Whole-genome sequencing was available in 59% of centers, frequently restricted to research or performed externally. Turnaround times for standard genetic testing were most commonly between 1 and 6 months. Genetic testing strategies varied by epilepsy subtype, with gene panels most frequently used as first-tier testing, and exome sequencing preferentially applied in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in MDT organization, access to genetic counseling, reimbursement, data-sharing and registry infrastructures. SIGNIFICANCE: Although genetic testing is widely available across ERN EpiCARE centers, substantial disparities persist in its organization, accessibility, and implementation. Addressing these gaps through strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration, harmonized diagnostic strategies, and enhanced European-level coordination will be essential to ensure equitable access to high-quality genetic care for individuals with epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Genetic testing is increasingly integrated in the diagnostic pathway for rare and complex epilepsies and treatment decisions. An ERN EpiCARE survey assessed how genetic testing is implemented across specialist epilepsy centers in Europe and identified persistent organizational, financial, and clinical barriers. Although most centers had access to advanced genomic testing, important differences were identified in access, reimbursement, turnaround times, and multidisciplinary expertise. European collaboration and harmonized practices are needed to support equitable access to high-quality genetic care for people living with epilepsy.

European reference networks↗
PubMed1987

Two complementation groups of Fanconi's anemia differ in their phenotypic response to a DNA-crosslinking treatment.

The two genetic complementation groups reported for Fanconi's anemia (FA) correspond to two phenotypic classes as characterized by measurements of the rate of DNA semiconservative synthesis after 8-methoxypsoralen photoaddition. This test allows a rapid genetic classification of FA patients which appears to be a prerequisite for investigations of the biochemical defect(s) in FA.

Anemia, Aplastic↗
PubMed2006

Phage library screening for the rapid identification and in vivo testing of candidate genes for a DNA vaccine against Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides small colony biotype.

A new strategy for rapidly selecting and testing genetic vaccines has been developed, in which a whole genome library is cloned into a bacteriophage lambda ZAP Express vector which contains both prokaryotic (P(lac)) and eukaryotic (P(CMV)) promoters upstream of the insertion site. The phage library is plated on Escherichia coli cells, immunoblotted, and probed with hyperimmune and/or convalescent-phase antiserum to rapidly identify vaccine candidates. These are then plaque purified and grown as liquid lysates, and whole bacteriophage particles are then used directly to immunize the host, following which P(CMV)-driven expression of the candidate vaccine gene occurs. In the example given here, a semirandom genome library of the bovine pathogen Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides small colony (SC) biotype was cloned into lambda ZAP Express, and two strongly immunodominant clones, lambda-A8 and lambda-B1, were identified and subsequently tested for vaccine potential against M. mycoides subsp. mycoides SC biotype-induced mycoplasmemia. Sequencing and immunoblotting indicated that clone lambda-A8 expressed an isopropyl-beta-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible M. mycoides subsp. mycoides SC biotype protein with a 28-kDa apparent molecular mass, identified as a previously uncharacterized putative lipoprotein (MSC_0397). Clone lambda-B1 contained several full-length genes from the M. mycoides subsp. mycoides SC biotype pyruvate dehydrogenase region, and two IPTG-independent polypeptides, of 29 kDa and 57 kDa, were identified on immunoblots. Following vaccination, significant anti-M. mycoides subsp. mycoides SC biotype responses were observed in mice vaccinated with clones lambda-A8 and lambda-B1. A significant stimulation index was observed following incubation of splenocytes from mice vaccinated with clone lambda-A8 with whole live M. mycoides subsp. mycoides SC biotype cells, indicating cellular proliferation. After challenge, mice vaccinated with clone lambda-A8 also exhibited a reduced level of mycoplasmemia compared to controls, suggesting that the MSC_0397 lipoprotein has a protective effect in the mouse model when delivered as a bacteriophage DNA vaccine. Bacteriophage-mediated immunoscreening using an appropriate vector system offers a rapid and simple technique for the identification and immediate testing of putative candidate vaccines from a variety of pathogens.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Type 2N von Willebrand disease: rapid genetic diagnosis of G2811A (R854Q), C2696T (R816W), T2701A (H817Q) and G2823T (C858F)--detection of a novel candidate type 2N mutation: C2810T (R854W).

The majority of patients with type 2N von Willebrand disease (VWD type 2N) have mutations in the region of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene encoding the factor VIII binding domain of VWF. Two mutations predominate among VWD type 2N patients: G2811A and C2696T, which respectively bring about the amino acid substitutions R854Q and R816W in VWF. Several other mutations have been found in VWD type 2N, including T2701A (H817Q) and G2823T (C858F). We have developed a genetic test which permits rapid screening for these four mutations in a single polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The test employs induced heteroduplex formation using two universal heteroduplex generators, one of which detects G2811A (R854Q) and G2823T (C858F), the other detects C2696T (R816W) and T2701A (H817Q). The allele frequency of the common G2811A (R854Q) mutation was investigated in the local (S. Wales) population by examination of 216 VWF genes (108 individuals) and was found to be 0.01. The heteroduplex-based test additionally detected a novel candidate type 2N mutation, C2810T (R854W) and a previously described polymorphism, G2805A (R852Q). The polymorphism showed allele frequencies of 0.92 (G nucleotide) and 0.08 (A nucleotide) in the population study.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Genetic testing and insurance. The Ad Hoc Committee on Genetic Testing/Insurance Issues.

The rapid expansion of opportunities for genetic testing has been accompanied by complex questions about the appropriate relationships between providers, patients, and insurers. Some of these questions involve large public-policy decisions, such as whether the government should guarantee access to health care for all citizens. Universal access to health care, without regard to past, present, or future risk of disease, could eliminate risk-oriented underwriting in health-care coverage. A positive response to that question will ameliorate other problems. Until universal access is reality, genetic testing and genetic diagnosis will raise important issues for the practicing geneticist. How much does a client need to know about insurance implications before consenting to a genetic test? Should patients be counseled to purchase insurance before being tested? Should genetic information be excluded from medical records before their release to insurance companies for routine reimbursements or underwriting? What are the ethical and legal responsibilities of the geneticist?

Confidentiality↗
PubMed1990

Aneuploidy in Drosophila, I. Genetic test systems in the female Drosophila melanogaster for the rapid detection of chemically induced chromosome gain and chromosome loss.

An account is provided of two genetic schemes in the Drosophila melanogaster female designed as rapid detectors of chemically induced aneuploidy, including both chromosome gain and chromosome loss. One scheme is referred to as FIX, in which the female carried free (heterozygously) inverted X (chromosomes) and the other, ZESTE, where females do not carry inversions and the X-linked sexually dimorphic zeste mutation plays the key role in the detection of aneuploid offspring. The principle attribute of the FIX system is that all euploid offspring are wild-type for body and eye color whereas aneuploid females have a yellow body and aneuploid males white eyes; int he ZESTE system all euploid individuals are wild-type for eye color, aneuploid females possess zeste-colored eyes and aneuploid males white eyes. In addition induced polyploidies (2X:2A gametes) appear as yellow and zeste male intersexes in the FIX and ZESTE systems, respectively. In this way all aneuploids are recognized immediately. Consequently, detection of compounds with weak effects requiring large sample sizes may be made in a fraction of the time associated with more traditional schemes for aneuploidy detection in Drosophila.

Aneuploidy↗
PubMed2001

Postgenomic medicine. Presymptomatic testing for prediction and prevention.

Significant changes are occurring in genetic screening paradigms. Genetic screening is moving from traditional analytes, such as small molecules and proteins, to molecular genetic testing involving DNA and RNA. There are significant consequences to these changes, involving issues for the family unit, such as misattribution of parentage, and concerns regarding discrimination, confidentiality, and privacy. Although these latter issues have broader concerns for medicine and medical information, in the context of genetic testing, information derived from one individual can have a significant impact on others within their family. Screening is also changing from mendelian disease ascertainment to predictive testing. Issues that arise involve appropriate age at testing for adult-onset disorders, the clinical validity and clinical use of genetic testing for complex diseases, and the efficacy of interventions following genetic testing. We are also learning that the phenotypes of even simple mendelian disorders are influenced by complex genetic and environmental factors. The observations that genotypes rarely predict phenotypes absolutely have significant ramifications for counseling based on mutation analysis, for example in neonates who have not yet manifested symptoms and in older children and in adults undergoing predictive testing. Molecular genetic testing often proceeds rapidly from the research laboratory to the clinical setting. We must recognize that for single-gene disorders with high penetrance, the information derived from such testing may be relatively easy to interpret and apply. For complex diseases, however, the populations studied and their demographic characteristics are extremely important for extrapolation to counseling of individual patients. The value of population-based predictive testing is exemplified by newborn screening. It is clear that the Human Genome Project, and the information and technologies from it, will have a much broader impact on public health by presymptomatic prediction and prevention of disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

A sensitive and rapid alternative to HLA typing as a genetic screening test for abacavir hypersensitivity syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Abacavir hypersensitivity reaction (ABC HSR) is a potentially life-threatening adverse reaction that affects approximately 8% of patients that initiate this antiretroviral drug. Independent groups have shown a strong predictive association between ABC HSR and HLA-B*5701, indicating that exclusion of HLA-B*5701 positive individuals from abacavir treatment would largely prevent ABC HSR. However, the limited availability and relatively high cost of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing represent barriers to the widespread implementation of this pharmacogenetic approach to abacavir prescribing. To facilitate routine screening, we have developed a rapid flow cytometry method for HLA-B57 phenotyping using commercially available B17 monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: Whole blood samples from 84 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients were examined by standard flow cytometry methods, using a two-colour B17-specific immunofluorescence assay in the CD45 lymphocyte population. RESULTS: All eight HLA-B57 individuals examined tested positive, while HLA-B57/58 negative individuals (n=74) tested negative for this flow cytometry test. Two non-HLA-B57 individuals showed weak cross-reactivity. CONCLUSION: In our predominantly Caucasian population, B17/CD45 dual staining was sufficient to identify individuals carrying B17 cell surface antigens. This approach, utilizing flow cytometry methods that are widely available in HIV laboratories, therefore offers a sensitive, rapid and cost-effective screening assay prior to abacavir prescription. Following risk stratification with this assay, it would be anticipated that identification of HLA-B*5701 using molecular HLA typing methods would be required in <10% of the screened population.

Alleles↗