Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RECTAL PROLAPSE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, severity, and associations between urinary incontinence and genital prolapse in females after surgery for fecal incontinence or rectal prolapse. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery for fecal incontinence (Group I) or rectal prolapse (Group II) were compared with a control group of females (Group III) by 43 questions regarding demographic data, past medical and surgical history, and diagnosis and treatment of anal and urinary incontinence and genital and rectal prolapse. The type (stress, urge, and total) of urinary incontinence was determined and graded using an incontinence severity questionnaire (Individual Incontinence Impact Questionnaire). RESULTS: Overall response rate in the three groups of patients was 40.1 percent. The questionnaire was sent to 240 patients operated on for fecal incontinence or rectal prolapse, and 83 of them responded (34.5 percent). The patients were distributed into three groups: Group I consisted of 51 patients (mean age 56.7 +/- 14); Group II consisted of 32 patients (69.7 +/- 11); and Group III consisted of 40 patients (60.5 +/- 16). The prevalence of urinary incontinence in Group I was 27 (54 percent), in Group II was 21 (65.6 percent), and Group III was 12 patients (30 percent; P = 0.003). Genital prolapse was present in 9 (17.6 percent), 11 (34.3 percent), and 5 patients (12.5 percent), respectively (P = 0.03). The prevalence of coexistent urinary incontinence and genital prolapse in both study groups was 22.8 percent (19 patients). There were no statistically significant differences between Groups I and II relative to prevalence, type, and severity of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse, but there were significant differences between the two study groups and the control group. Of the patients in the study group, 67 percent had urinary incontinence before or at the time of surgery. CONCLUSION: There is a higher prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females operated on for either fecal incontinence or rectal prolapse than in a control group. Therefore, female patients with fecal incontinence or rectal prolapse should be evaluated and treated by a multidisciplinary group of pelvic floor clinicians, including a gynecologist or urologist with special training in female pelvic floor dysfunction and a colorectal surgeon.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Management of rectal prolapse in children.

PURPOSE: Rectal prolapse in children is not uncommon and usually is a self-limiting condition in infancy. Most cases respond to conservative management; however, surgery is occasionally required in cases that are intractable to conservative treatment. This study was designed to analyze the outcomes of rectal prolapse in children and to propose a pathway for the management of these cases in children. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all cases of rectal prolapse referred to our surgical unit during a period of five years was performed. End point was recurrence of prolapse requiring manual reduction under sedation or an anesthetic. Results are presented as median (range) and statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test; P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 49 children (25 males) presented with symptoms of rectal prolapse at a median age of 2.6 years (range, 4 months -10.6 years). All children received an initial period of conservative treatment with watchful expectancy and/or laxatives. Twenty-five patients were managed conservatively without any additional procedures (Group A), and 24 patients had one or more interventions, such as injection sclerotherapy, Thiersch procedure, anal stretch, banding of prolapse, and rectopexy (Group B). Management of rectal prolapse was successful with no recurrences in 24 patients (96 percent) in Group A vs. 15 patients (63 percent) in Group B at a median follow-up period of 14 (range, 2-96) months. An underlying condition was found in 84 percent of patients in Group A vs. 54 percent in Group B (P = 0.024). The age at presentation was younger than four years in 88 percent of patients in Group A vs. 58 percent in Group B (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Rectal prolapse in children does respond to conservative management. A decision to operate is based on age of patient, duration of conservative management, and frequency of recurrent prolapse (>2 episodes requiring manual reduction) along with symptoms of pain, rectal bleeding, and perianal excoriation because of recurrent prolapse. Those cases presenting younger than four years of age and with an associated condition have a better prognosis. The authors propose an algorithm for the management of rectal prolapse in children.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1980

The occult rectal prolapse syndrome.

Occult rectal prolapse is a condition of young adults which causes problems in diagnosis. Symptoms consist of tenesmus and the passage of blood and mucus associated with constipation and straining at stool. The rectal prolapse often remains unrecognized for a long time because demonstration of the prolapse is difficult. There are characteristic changes in the rectum on clinical examination and these should alert the clinician to the diagnosis. Treatment of the prolapse relieves the symptoms.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Experience at a colon and rectal surgery service].

BACKGROUND: Rectal prolapse is as ancient humanity. Treatment must be surgical in adult patients. There is no gold standard procedure to date; thus, this has given rise to controversy. OBJECTIVE: One objective was to analyze our results, complications, mortality, and recurrence in a Colorectal Surgery Service for surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed records of all patients treated surgically with rectal prolapse at our Service from March 1995 to March 2001. RESULTS: 31 patients; 22 were female and nine male with age range of 24 to 89 years. Evolution time was 6 months to 40 years; 11 patients had preoperative incontinence. We carried our four procedures, abdominal procedure hospital stay was 4 to 7 days; we had 18% long-term complications with no mortality or recurrence. Hospital stay in perineal procedures was 1 to 2 days with one procedure associated with death due to AV blockade, with 14% recurrence for helicoidal suture procedure, and no complications. Altemeier procedure recurred at 1 month of surgery. Continence score of Miller improve postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal procedures have less recurrence than perineal procedures; abdominal procedures must be considered in young patients with low risk, and perineal procedures in older patients with high risk, that are coantraindications for a major surgical procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Prospective study of the effect of rectopexy on colonic motility in patients with rectal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rectal prolapse have abnormal hindgut motility. This study examined the effect of rectal prolapse surgery on colonic motility. METHODS: Twelve patients undergoing sutured rectopexy were studied before and 6 months after surgery by colonic manometry, colonic transit study and clinical assessment of bowel function. The results were compared with those from seven control subjects. RESULTS: Before surgery colonic pressure was greater in patients than controls (P < 0.050). Controls responded to a meal stimulus by increasing colonic pressure; this increase was absent in patients. After rectopexy, colonic pressure reduced towards control values and patients' colonic pressure response to a meal returned. High-amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs) were seen in all controls but in only three patients before and two patients after surgery. Three patients had prolonged colonic transit before and eight after rectopexy. CONCLUSION: Patients with rectal prolapse have abnormal colonic motility associated with reduced HAPC activity. Rectopexy reduces colonic pressure but fails to restore HAPCs, reduce constipation or improve colonic transit. These observations help explain the pathophysiology of constipation associated with rectal prolapse.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in women with surgically managed rectal prolapse: a population-based case-control study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of genital prolapse surgery and urinary incontinence in female patients operated on for rectal prolapse compared with a matched control group without rectal prolapse. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with a history of abdominal rectal prolapse surgery and 200 randomly selected age-matched and gender-matched control subjects without rectal prolapse received an extensive health care history survey. RESULTS: Response rate in the patient group was 48 of 52 (92 percent) and 165 of 200 (82 percent) in the control group. Rectal prolapse was associated with an increased risk of surgery for uterine prolapse (odds ratio = 3.1; 95 percent confidence interval = 1.4-6.9) and vaginal wall prolapse (odds ratio = 3.2; 95 percent confidence interval = 1.3-7.8). Mean age at hysterectomy because of uterine prolapse was 54.7 years in the patient group compared with 62.6 years in the control group (P < 0.01). Mean age at vaginal wall prolapse surgery was 60.2 years in the patient group compared with 66.6 years in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the cohorts regarding prevalence or age at debut of urinary incontinence. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a strong association between rectal and genital prolapse surgery suggesting that diagnosis of rectal prolapse necessitating surgical intervention should prompt a multidisciplinary pelvic floor assessment.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Rectal prolapse in autistic children.

Rectal prolapse in children is not uncommon, but surgery is rarely indicated. In mentally challenged adults and children, rectal prolapse occurs more frequently than in the general population and often requires surgical intervention in the second to third decade of life. The authors describe 3 children with autism and mental retardation who presented with rectal prolapse at an earlier age than would be anticipated with mental retardation alone. All 3 children required surgical intervention.

Age of Onset↗
PubMed2000

Schistosomal pelvic floor myopathy contributes to the pathogenesis of rectal prolapse in young males.

PURPOSE: Rectal prolapse is common in young males in Egypt. The role of schistosomiasis in the pathogenesis of rectal prolapse is not clearly defined. The purpose of this work is to study changes in the pelvic floor muscles in patients of rectal prolapse associated with schistosomiasis. METHODS: This study included 33 male patients with rectal prolapse of whom 27 patients with schistosomiasis and 6 patients free from schistosomiasis. Biopsies were taken from the pelvic floor muscle during surgery. The prepared sections were examined for histopathologic structural changes, for ultrastructural changes (by using electron microscopy) and after immunohistochemical staining by using anti-IgG and anti-IgM antibodies. RESULTS: The muscles from the patients without schistosomiasis had no histologic or EM changes and showed negative staining for IgG and IgM. Myopathic changes were found in the group of patients with schistosomiasis, including increased variation in the fiber diameter in 66.6 percent of patients, degenerative changes in 59.26 percent of patients, fiber splitting and fragmentation in 44.4 percent of patients, and endomysial fatty changes in 55.5 percent of patients. Ultrastructural study revealed starting loss of striation and margination of the nucleus in 70.37 percent of patients, distorted myofibrillar pattern in 51.85 percent of patients, disturbed endoplasmic reticulum and increased glycogen granules in all patients, the mitochondria are irregularly arranged with electron dense matrix in 40.74 percent of patients, and prominent nuclear sap in 13.72 percent of patients. The muscles of all the schistosomal patients showed a positive cytoplasmic staining for immunoglobulin G, of them only 12 patients showed positive staining for IgM. CONCLUSION: Patients with schistosomiasis suffer from pelvic floor myopathic changes that may contribute to the pathogenesis of rectal prolapse in young males. The immunohistochemical findings suggest immunologic mechanism for this myopathy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Prosthetic rectopexy to the pelvic floor and sigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Full thickness rectal prolapse in young adults with normal pelvic floor is a disease in which the rectum is exceedingly long and mobile. Surgical treatment should correct both anatomical defects by combined rectopexy and colonic resection, which is expected to be less constipating than rectopexy alone. The aim of this study was to describe an original procedure of rectopexy to the pelvic floor with prosthetic material combined with sigmoid resection, and to evaluate prospectively anatomical and functional results. METHODS: Thirty-five patients (30 women) of median age 44 years (range 18 to 74) were operated on for full thickness rectal prolapse with normal pelvic floor. The rectum was mobilized posteriorly without division of the lateral ligaments and attached to the pelvic floor previously repaired with a nonabsorbable mesh. The sigmoid colon was resected with hand-sewn anastomosis. Clinical results were assessed by a questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no deaths or any septic or anastomotic complications. Small bowel obstruction was corrected laparoscopically in 1 patient. Mean hospital stay was 8 days (range 6 to 14). Mean follow-up was 34 months (range 10 to 93). No recurrence was seen. Preoperatively, 33 patients (94%) complained of constipation mainly with emptying problems (21 patients) and 25 patients (71.5%) were incontinent. Postoperatively, no constipated or incontinent patient's condition worsened. Rectal emptying was restored in 17 patients (81%). Eighteen incontinent patients (72%) regained full continence. On the other hand, 2 patients with normal bowel function worsened and 1 patient with an altered rectal compliance after Delorme's operation became incontinent. CONCLUSIONS: In young adults with rectal prolapse and normal pelvic floor undergoing prosthetic rectopexy and sigmoid resection (a) morbidity was low, (b) anatomical control was obtained in all cases, (c) emptying problems were corrected, and (d) deleterious effects are likely to occur if they had no constipation before operation or if rectal compliance was previously altered.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults.

BACKGROUND: Complete rectal prolapse is a debilitating condition, which affects both the very young and the elderly and can cause faecal incontinence. The range of surgical methods available to correct the underlying anal sphincter or pelvic floor defects in complete rectal prolapse poses the question about the choice of the best operation. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of surgery on the treatment of rectal prolapse in adults. The following specific issues have been addressed: I. Whether surgical intervention is better than no treatment; II. Whether an abdominal approach to surgery is better then a perineal approach; III. Whether one method for performing rectopexy is better than another; IV. Whether laparoscopic access is better than open access for surgery; V. Whether resection should be included in the procedure. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group trials register, the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 2, 1999), Medline (up to March 1999), Embase (1998 up to January 1999), Sigle (1980 up to December 1996), Biosis (1998 up to March 1999), SCI (1998 up to March 1999), ISTP (1982 up to March 1999) and the reference lists of relevant articles. We hand searched the British Journal of Surgery 1995-8, and the Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 1995-8. We also searched the proceedings of the Association of Coloproctology, meeting 1999. Date of the most recent searches: March 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials of surgery in the management of rectal prolapse. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected studies from the literature, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials. The three primary outcome measures were number of patients with recurrent rectal prolapse, or residual mucosal prolapse or faecal incontinence. MAIN RESULTS: Eight trials were included with a total of 264 participants. No trial included a group receiving no treatment, or anal encirclement, or Delormes procedure, or laparoscopic suture rectopexy, or laparoscopic resection rectopexy. One trial (20 participants) compared both perineal and abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair; four trials (175 participants) compared different types of open rectopexy techniques; one trial (21 participants) compared laparoscopic with open mesh rectopexy; and two trials included comparisons between open resection rectopexy and rectopexy alone. In all comparisons data were few. There were no detectable differences in recurrent prolapse between abdominal and perineal approaches, although there was a suggestion that residual faecal incontinence was less common after abdominal surgery. There were no detectable differences between the methods used for fixation during rectopexy. Division, rather than preservation, of the lateral ligaments was associated with less recurrent prolapse but more post-operative constipation, although these findings were found in small numbers. There were too few data with which to compare laparoscopic with open surgery. Bowel resection during rectopexy was associated with lower rates of constipation, but again numbers were small. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The small number of relevant trials identified, and their small sample sizes together with other methodological weaknesses severely limit the usefulness of this review for guiding practice. It was impossible to identify or refute clinically important differences between the alternative surgical operations. Larger rigorous trials are needed to improve the evidence with which to define optimum surgical treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Rectal prolapse in children.

Rectal prolapse in children is nowadays a rare anomaly. Potty training in young children is the common cause and the resulting prolapse can be treated conservatively. In children with refractory prolapse, sclerosing injections may be used. Operative treatment by posterior rectopexy is only indicated in the very few cases of long-standing prolapse.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Rectal prolapse in children.

Rectal prolapse in children is an uncommon clinical entity in western countries. Treatment is generally supportive with surgery reserved for the intractable case. If operative intervention is advised, it should consist of one of several limited procedures that can be safely performed with low morbidity: anal encirclement, presacral packing, sclerosing injection, or linear rectal cauterization.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1982

Linear cauterization for the treatment of rectal prolapse in infants and children.

Rectal prolapse in pediatric patients has different anatomic causative and, hence, therapeutic significance from prolapse or procidentia encountered in adults. Medical management successfully relieves prolapse in a large percentage of pediatric patients. Seventy-three patients in whom the correction of rectal prolapse by medical management failed underwent linear cauterization of the anorectum. Seventy-one were treated successfully. Five children had an additional cauterization for the permanent relief of rectal prolapse. One patient required an additional extensive operation to prevent recurrence. This successful method of managing rectal prolapse has been associated with a low morbidity rate and should be considered before attempting more complex alternative surgical procedures.

Child↗
PubMed1996

Pathology of the rectal wall in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and complete rectal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: The aetiology and pathology of rectal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer are poorly understood. AIMS: To examine the full thickness rectal wall in these two conditions. METHODS: The pathological abnormalities in the surgically resected rectal wall were studied from nine patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, 11 complete rectal prolapse, and nine cancer controls. Routine haematoxylin and eosin and Van Gieson staining for collagen were performed. RESULTS: The rectal wall from solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens was thickened compared with complete rectal prolapse and controls. The major difference was in the muscularis propria (2.2 v 1.1 v 1.2 mm, medians, p < 0.005) and particularly the inner circular muscular layer, and to a lesser extent the submucosal and outer longitudinal muscular layers. Some solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens showed unique features such as decussation of the two muscular layers (four of nine), nodular induration of inner circular layer (four of nine) and grouping of outer longitudinal layer into bundles (three of nine); these were not seen in complete rectal prolapse or control specimens. CONCLUSIONS: These features, which resemble the features of high pressure sphincter tissue, may be of aetiological importance, and suggest a different pathogenesis for these two disorders. Excess collagen was seen in both disorders, was more severe in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens, and probably reflects a response to repeated trauma.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Rectal prolapse associated with bulimia nervosa: report of seven cases.

PURPOSE: Rectal prolapse is a condition in which, when complete, the full thickness of the rectal wall protrudes through the anus. Bulimia nervosa is an eating disorder characterized by periodic food binges, which are followed by purging. Purging usually takes the form of self-induced vomiting, laxative abuse, and/or diuretic abuse. We report seven cases of rectal prolapse associated with bulimia nervosa. METHODS: The case histories of seven women with rectal prolapse and bulimia nervosa, average age 29 (range 21-42) years, seen over a period of 11 years (1987-1997) were reviewed. An analysis of the clinical data, including history, presenting physical examination, surgical treatment, and outcome was performed. RESULTS: All seven patients had a diagnosis of bulimia nervosa, made either before or with a diagnosis of rectal prolapse. Rectal prolapse was confirmed in each patient at anorectal examination. Five patients underwent sigmoid resection with proctopexy, one died before operative therapy, and one awaits further treatment. One of the five surgical patients had a recurrence that was managed by a perineal rectosigmoidectomy. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, despite extensive review of both bulimia nervosa and rectal prolapse as seen in the medical literature, an association between the two has not been described previously. Several aspects of bulimia nervosa, including constipation, laxative use, overzealous exercise, and increased intra-abdominal pressure from forced vomiting are likely causes for the probable relationship with rectal prolapse. The possibility that an atypically young female presenting with rectal prolapse may also have bulimia nervosa should be taken into account by clinicians. This may assist the diagnosis of bulimia nervosa, a disease with multiple morbidities. Conversely, a patient being treated for bulimia nervosa who develops anorectal symptoms may come to earlier diagnosis and treatment for rectal prolapse.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Modified Thiersch operation for rectal prolapse. Technique and results.

Rectal prolapse is best treated by intra-abdominal or perineal procedures that either resect the redundant rectosigmoid colon or fix the rectum within the pelvis. We have found the Thiersch procedure to be adequate treatment in patients who are high risk or who have only mild to moderate prolapse of the rectum. Over the past 20 years, we have treated 15 patients with a modified Thiersch procedure, using a knitted Dacron vascular graft to encircle the anus. One patient required a second Thiersch procedure after failure of a Ripstein procedure that followed failure of a Thiersch procedure done with wire. A second Thiersch procedure was required in two patients after suture breakage, and in one patient after removal of an infected graft. Two other patients had graft infections necessitating removal of the Dacron graft; one patient had a perianal infection that was treated without removing the graft. Continence was achieved in six of nine patients previously incontinent, and maintained in the six patients who had been continent before operation. Prolapse was corrected in 13 of the 15 patients. Although the Thiersch procedure is not applicable to all patients with rectal prolapse, it can be used successfully when performed properly.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Rectal prolapse during pregnancy. A case report.

BACKGROUND: Rectal prolapse is a bothersome surgical problem that is relatively infrequent. It usually occurs in the fifth to seventh decades of life and is more common in women. CASE: A 33-year-old woman, gravida 3, para 2, was found to have a large rectal prolapse at 33 weeks' gestation. Manual reduction was successfully performed after injecting 2% lidocaine into and around the anal sphincter. Because she could not undergo definitive surgical repair during her pregnancy, the patient was managed with an aggressive stool softening regimen and self-reduction techniques. Labor was induced in the 40th gestational week. Epidural anesthesia was employed, and delivery was accomplished via low-outlet forceps application. The patient underwent definitive surgical repair of the rectal prolapse eight weeks postpartum. CONCLUSION: Rectal prolapse is a rare condition during the childbearing years. We found no prior case reports of rectal prolapse occurring during pregnancy. While childbirth itself is not considered a risk factor for rectal prolapse, a prior history of perineal lacerations may be a risk factor. To manage rectal prolapse that occurs during pregnancy, consideration should be given to passive forceps delivery under epidural anesthesia to avoid the possibility of worsening the prolapse.

Adult↗