Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Public Health Infrastructure”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Information and surveillance systems and community health: building the public health information infrastructure.

The scope and purpose of public health injury and disease surveillance systems will expand in response to the increasing information needs of communities and health organizations. Public health leaders must focus on the entire information infrastructure. Surveillance and information systems need to evolve to include targeting and evaluating community-wide prevention programs. Standards governing exchange as well as data content will become central to these new systems and the emerging health information infrastructure. Future surveillance systems will face challenges in forming partnerships with managed care organizations, in developing new information tools, and in training the public health workforce.

Humans↗

Public health, data standards, and vocabulary: crucial infrastructure for reliable public health surveillance.

The present, rapid adoption of electronic records in clinical care is likely to shift public health surveillance from passive, human-mediated abstraction to active, computer-generated reports. However, the accuracy and efficiency of this process depends upon the adoption of consistent information standards from beside to population and the relevance of these data to public health. This article outlines the current status of data standards of relevance to public health and expands upon the ideal goal state in which health information would be collected once and then reused for multiple health-related purposes, including public health surveillance.

Computer Communication Networks↗

The role of public health nurses in bioterrorism preparedness.

BACKGROUND: Public health nurses have a central function in the public health system. Nurses conduct disease surveillance, which is an important first step in recognizing diseases caused by bioterrorist agents. Unfortunately, the current public health infrastructure and expectations for public health nurses are not clearly defined and therefore pose serious difficulties for conducting disease surveillance. Increased surveillance activities for bioterrorism preparedness add more responsibilities to the work of public health nurses. METHODS: A qualitative study on disease surveillance was conducted with public health officials at regional and local levels, working in a variety of urban and rural settings in one large public health region in Texas. Data analysis was supported by qualitative research software, The Ethnograph. RESULTS: The study found that the nurses working at the local level were extremely dedicated to serving their communities, had formed informal partnerships that are essential for disease surveillance, and effectively used informal communication channels to obtain critical surveillance information. The study revealed that nurses had unmet needs and experienced multiple barriers to conducting disease surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The study's findings could have implications for public policy and nursing leadership. Defining the structure of the public health system and the scope of public health nurses' responsibilities will serve as the cornerstone for improvement of bioterrorism preparedness.

Bioterrorism↗

National health policies: sub-Saharan African case studies (1980-1990).

Four countries, Botswana, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana and Zimbabwe, were chosen as cases to study the impact of national health policies on national health status in sub-Saharan Africa. Through a conceptual framework that covers health problem identification, policy formulation and implementation procedures, the study examined national translations of Primary Health Care (PHC) and Health for All by the Year 2000 (HFA/2000) strategies. A series of government measures, taken between 1980-1986 for health policy development and implementation in these countries, were treated as policy determinants of national health outcomes for the period ending 1990. The impact of these determinants on national health status was then analyzed through a comparative description and documentation of observable patterns and trends in infant mortality rates (IMR), under-5 mortality rates (U5MR) and life expectancy. Policy guidelines from PHC and HFA/2000 were used in conjunction with the respective per capita Gross National Products to categorize the four cases. Based on these guidelines, Botswana was ranked high, both in terms of policy development and the level of economic development, while Zimbabwe ranked high in terms of policy development but relatively low in economic terms. Cote d'Ivoire ranked high on economic development but low with regard to its policy framework. Ghana was at the other end of the spectrum, ranking low both in terms of its policy development and its economic performance. The comparative analysis revealed that Botswana and Zimbabwe performed better than Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana on the three outcome indicators. Despite Cote d'Ivoire's superior level of economic development, its health status fell behind that of Zimbabwe and even Ghana. The study concluded that policies formulated and implemented in accordance with key PHC principles could account for improvements in national health status. Since the end of the study period (1990), there have been significant political changes in the sub-Saharan African region as a whole and in some of the case countries in particular. Political leadership has changed in Ghana and Cote d'Ivoire with some course corrections in Ghana's health plans. Health sector financing in the region has become more dependent on external donors. The World Bank leads the external donor community in promoting policy-based lending. The complexity of a number of health problems has changed while the problems themselves remain the same as before. Essentially, building viable public health infrastructures to address basic public health needs must still be high on the agenda of action for most governments in the region. Thus, notwithstanding some course corrections and reasonable shifts in priorities, all the PHC principles are still applicable, indeed, much needed in the sub-Saharan African region. This study's findings, underscoring the fact that significant improvements in health are possible even where financial resources are limited, still hold true.

Africa South of the Sahara↗

A systems approach to public health workforce development.

During the 1990s, several distinct but interrelated efforts to strengthen the public health infrastructure were launched. Defining public health work in terms of core functions and essential services, these efforts focused on the competence of the workforce and the performance of public health agencies. The systems approach offered here highlights the relationships and interdependencies among these three components of public health practice: (1) the work, (2) the worker, and (3) the work setting. The model suggests that advances in public health workforce development may require major public health organizational development efforts.

Competency-Based Education↗

[Relationship between water supply, sanitation, public health, and environment: elements for the formulation of a sanitary infrastructure planning model].

The understanding of sanitation infrastructure, public health, and environmental relations is a fundamental assumption for planning sanitation infrastructure in urban areas. This article thus suggests elements for developing a planning model for sanitation infrastructure. The authors performed a historical survey of environmental and public health issues related to the sector, an analysis of the conceptual frameworks involving public health and sanitation systems, and a systematization of the various effects that water supply and sanitation have on public health and the environment. Evaluation of these effects should guarantee the correct analysis of possible alternatives, deal with environmental and public health objectives (the main purpose of sanitation infrastructure), and provide the most reasonable indication of actions. The suggested systematization of the sanitation systems effects in each step of their implementation is an advance considering the association between the fundamental elements for formulating a planning model for sanitation infrastructure.

Environmental Health↗

Strengthening the public health system for a healthier future.

On November 6, 2002, Grantmakers In Health (GIH) convened a group of experts from the fields of philanthropy, research, government, and policy to examine the nation's public health infrastructure and explore opportunities for grantmakers to strengthen and sustain this fragile and troubled system. During the course of this meeting, representatives from the Institute of Medicine, which recently released a report on this topic, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discussed the role of the national public health system and reviewed weaknesses in its infrastructure. Elaborating on these points, local public health leaders offered an on-the-ground perspective of the challenges they face as they struggle to maintain and improve the health of the public at the same time as they prepare for the possibility of bioterrorism. Finally, several foundations with experience in this area shared their strategies for helping to buttress the infrastructure so vital to the health of the nation. This Issue Brief builds on a paper prepared in advance of the meeting by incorporating the highlights from presentations and discussions that took place at GIH's Issue Dialogue. It also incorporates comments and discussion from GIH's 2002 Fall Forum intensive breakout session Worst Case Public Health Scenario: Can Philanthropy Respond? Following a brief introduction to the public health system and its evolution over the past several decades, the Issue Brief discusses essential elements of the public health infrastructure, reviews the issues confronting each of these elements, and profiles various philanthropic initiatives aimed at repairing and improving the public health infrastructure. It concludes with an in-depth look at the infrastructure issues involved in emergency preparedness.

Community Health Planning↗

Public health and national security: the critical role of increased federal support.

Protecting the public's health historically has been a state and local responsibility. However, the growing threat of bioterrorism has highlighted the importance of a strong public health infrastructure to the nation's homeland security and has focused increased attention on the preparedness of the public health system. As a result, federal public health funding has increased exponentially since the anthrax attacks of late 2001, and Congress has passed sweeping new federal legislation intended to strengthen the nation's public health system. This heightened level of federal interest and support should yield important public health benefits. Most recognize that after years of neglect the public health infrastructure cannot be rebuilt overnight. As we implement a comprehensive strategy to increase the capabilities and capacity of our nation's public health system, it is essential to address a series of important policy questions, including the appropriate level of ongoing public health investments from local, state, and federal sources.

Bioterrorism↗

Taking care of the sick and scared: a local response in pandemic preparedness.

Virtually all health care operations, including public health, are undertaken only at a local or regional level. Large-scale infectious disease emergencies, such as SARS or pandemic influenza, will be recognized and managed at a local level. The creation of the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) was an important step in strengthening public health capacity. However, we need adequate operational capacity in local public health departments to have a strong public health system. Local public health takes an integral role in the preparation for and management of infectious disease emergencies. Local public health departments and regional public health infrastructures must be positioned to both maintain core functions and to lead and support health sector response to emergencies. The local establishment of a flexible and sustainable emergency management system must address the need to: integrate health care and first responders; provide all-hazards tools for managing a crisis at the frontline; rank service priorities and provide surge resources; and provide accurate information on a timely basis. Only the leaders within the local or regional health care facilities and organizations can develop workable plans to deliver health care. PHAC must ensure and support the local public health infrastructure and local emergency preparedness. Without this support, there will be consequences for local response to major public health emergencies.

Canada↗

A regional integrated information system to assure maternal-child health services: a progress report.

Priorities for improving the health of our nation include rebuilding the public health infrastructure through increasing assessment, policy development, and assurance capacities in our communities. Capacity building necessitates formalizing and strengthening public health practice linkages to achieve Year 2000 objectives. Determining progress in achieving objectives requires development of public health infrastructure surveillance and data system capabilities. The Tracking Center of Tracking and Outreach Program for St. Louis (TOPS), through unique collaboration among academic and practice partners, laid the foundation for a Regional Integrated Information System (RIIS) by developing a centralized maternal-child health data base for prenatal and pediatric care providers. The RIIS model provides an example of a capacity building system designed to provide public health surveillance, assessment, planning, and evaluation capabilities. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): health information systems, prenatal care, immunization, maternal-child health care, public health surveillance.

Child↗

Federal block grants and public health: a call for physician partnership and leadership. AMA Council on Scientific Affairs.

Current transitions in health care financing and delivery systems have significant implications for public hospitals, community clinics, and health agencies, which provide important outreach and preventive services and rely heavily on federal and state funds. Strong concerns are being raised about the consequences of abrupt and drastic changes in funding of community health institutions and the continuing deterioration of rural and urban public health infrastructures. The viability of public hospitals, clinics, and local health agencies is threatened as government officials consider proposals for defunding, restructuring, or eliminating these entities. In 1996, Congress, the Clinton administration, and state and local government officials considered federal grant proposals and reforms that had potentially far-reaching implications for medical and public health professionals, expressing strong interest in consolidating various specific and narrowly defined categorical grant programs into broader block grant programs. Although no legislation was enacted, deliberations about federal block grant proposals provided important opportunities for physicians and medical societies to support public health activities and guard against further funding reductions that could weaken community health programs and diminish existing levels of quality and access. Ultimately, such deliberations provided a stimulus for medical associations and physicians to strengthen or renew partnerships with public health agencies and officials and provide necessary leadership to ensure that public health and preventive medicine become more integral components of the nation's health system.

American Medical Association↗

Beyond informatics: an electronic community infrastructure for public health.

Public health agencies are in the early stages of building an electronic infrastructure that will link them to each other and eventually to the "information superhighway." Emphasis in planning and development is on data systems and the information and training services that can enhance essential public health services. This article argues for a larger vision of the potential of electronic networks for public health. It discusses the health and other challenges facing public health, the limitations of conventional efforts, and the emerging consensus on public health core functions. Finally, it examines current and potential uses of information technology. The article concludes by proposing that the public health community should develop a collaborative and inclusive vision of public health in an electronic world and provide guidance and support for agency implementation to ensure a stronger system that can meet the health and health equity challenges ahead.

Community Networks↗

Wisconsin Emergency Assistance Volunteer Registry (WEAVR): how physicians can help and why they are needed.

The Wisconsin Division of Public Health (DPH) and its partners have developed the necessary public health infrastructure and core expertise to prepare for, and respond to, public health threats and emergencies. The infrastructure includes 12 public health preparedness consortia that have been established across the state. An important part of the response plan is to assure that the responder workforce is adequate to meet the need at the local, regional, and statewide levels. The responder workforce includes health professional volunteers who, if called on, will take on a variety of assigned roles relevant to a defined incident. In order to facilitate an organized system for volunteers to indicate their skills and availability, DPH has developed a secure and confidential database--the Wisconsin Emergency Assistance Volunteer Registry (WEAVR)--to collect and organize contact information on health professional volunteers and to make contact with volunteers when needed. Physicians, as well as other health professional volunteers, are critical to protect the health and safety of the community, especially if the need to dispense prophylactic medications or to vaccinate the entire population of Wisconsin arises. At the time of an event, volunteers will receive "just-in-time" training after reporting to their assigned location. In other states, physicians have found this emergency training to be of value to their overall practice of medicine. Information about how to sign on to WEAVR is provided.

Emergencies↗

Assessment of epidemiologic capacity in state and territorial health departments--United States, 2004.

In November 2001, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) conducted a survey of state and territorial health departments to assess their core epidemiologic capacity. The survey was completed just before distribution of approximately $1 billion in terrorism preparedness and emergency response funds in fiscal year 2002, intended to improve the U.S. public health infrastructure. Results of the 2001 survey, published in 2003, indicated inadequate capacity in six of eight key epidemiology program areas (all except infectious disease and chronic disease) to fully perform the essential public health services most dependent on epidemiology. In 2004, CSTE conducted a follow-up survey that assessed epidemiologic capacity in the United States and its territories in the same eight program areas, estimated the number of additional epidemiologists needed for full performance, and identified education and training needs. This report summarizes the results of that 2004 follow-up survey, which indicated a 26.9% increase from 2001 in the overall number of epidemiologists working in state and territorial health departments, increased capacity in two program areas (i.e., terrorism preparedness and emergency response; maternal and child health) and decreased capacity in six other program areas (i.e., infectious disease, chronic disease, environmental health, injury, occupational health, and oral health). Results also revealed that 28.5% of epidemiologists lacked any formal training or academic coursework in epidemiology. Creation of a strong public health infrastructure fully capable of performing essential services will require additional trained epidemiologists in state and territorial health departments.

Epidemiology↗

Emerging infections: getting ahead of the curve.

The early history of infectious diseases was characterized by sudden, unpredictable outbreaks, frequently of epidemic proportion. Scientific advances in the late 19th and early 20th centuries resulted in the prevention and control of many infectious diseases, particularly in industrialized nations. Despite these improvements in health, outbreaks of infectious disease continue to occur, and new infections emerge. Since 1987, the National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine (IOM) has published three reports that have identified erosion of the public health infrastructure among the factors contributing to new and reemerging infectious diseases. In partnership with many public and private organizations in the United States and abroad, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed a strategic plan that addresses the priorities set forth in the IOM reports and serves as a guide for CDC and its partners to combat emerging microbial threats to health. Laboratory-based surveillance, better communication networks, and improvements in the public health infrastructure are the cornerstones of the strategy. Emerging Infectious Diseases, a new periodical produced by CDC, will serve as a forum for exchange of information about incipient trends in infectious diseases, analysis of factors contributing to disease emergence, and development and implementation of prevention measures.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗

What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections?

Even in an era in which access to personal "cleanliness" and a public health infrastructure are readily available in developed countries, illnesses associated with day care centres and homes continue to be a problem. The inhabitants of less developed countries, on the other hand, must contend with an inadequate public health infrastructure, lack of education programmes, and economic limitations in obtaining hygiene products. Therefore, less developed countries carry a greater burden of morbidity and mortality from infectious illnesses. The objective of this review is to examine and assess the epidemiological evidence for a causal relation between hygiene practices and infections. The Medline database was searched from January 1980 to June 2001 and studies were included if the outcome(s) was infection or symptoms of infection, and if the independent variable(s) was one or more hygiene measures. The strength of the association as measured by the relative reduction in risk of illness was appreciable and generally greater than 20%. Despite methodological strengths and limitations of the studies assessed, the weight of evidence collectively suggests that personal and environmental hygiene reduces the spread of infection. The results from this review demonstrate that there is a continued, measurable, positive effect of personal and community hygiene on infections.

Communicable Disease Control↗

The public health information infrastructure. A national review of the law on health information privacy.

Our objectives were to review and analyze the laws in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico that regulate the acquisition, storage, and use of public health data and to offer proposals for reform of the laws on public health information privacy. Virtually all states reported some statutory protection for governmentally maintained health data for public health information in general (49 states), communicable diseases (42 states), and sexually transmitted diseases (43 states). State statutes permitted disclosure of data for statistical purposes (42 states), contact tracing (39 states), epidemiologic investigations (22 states), and subpoena or court order (14 states). The survey revealed significant problems that affect both the development of fair and effective public health information systems and the protection of privacy. Statutes may be silent about the degree of privacy protection afforded, confer weaker privacy protection to certain kinds of information, or grant health officials broad discretion to disseminate personal information. Our proposals for law reform are based on a meeting of experts at the Carter Presidential Center under the auspices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists: (1) an independent data protection commission should be established, (2) health authorities should justify the collection of personally identifiable information, (3) subjects should be given basic information about data practices, (4) data should be held and used in accordance with fair information practices, (5) legally binding privacy and security assurances should attach to identifiable health information with significant penalties for breach of these assurances, (6) disclosure of data should be made only for purposes consistent with the original collection, and (7) secondary uses beyond those originally intended by the data collector should be permitted only with informed consent.

Computer Security↗