Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promotion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1983

The tac promoter: a functional hybrid derived from the trp and lac promoters.

Two hybrid promoters that are functional in Escherichia coli have been constructed. These hybrid promoters, tacI and tacII, were derived from sequences of the trp and the lac UV5 promoters. In the first hybrid promoter (tacI), the DNA upstream of position -20 with respect to the transcriptional start site was derived from the trp promoter. The DNA downstream of position -20 was derived from the lac UV5 promoter. In the second hybrid promoter (tacII), the DNA upstream of position -11 at the Hpa I site within the Pribnow box was derived from the trp promoter. The DNA downstream of position -11 is a 46-base-pair synthetic DNA fragment that specifies part of the hybrid Pribnow box and the entire lac operator. It also specifies a Shine-Dalgarno sequence flanked by two unique restriction sites (portable Shine-Dalgarno sequence). The tacI and the tacII promoters respectively direct transcription approximately 11 and 7 times more efficiently than the derepressed parental lac UV5 promoter and approximately 3 and 2 times more efficiently than the trp promoter in the absence of the trp repressor. Both hybrid promoters can be repressed by the lac repressor and both can be derepressed with isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactoside. Consequently, these hybrid promoters are useful for the controlled expression of foreign genes at high levels in E. coli. In contrast to the trp and the lac UV5 promoters, the tacI promoter has not only a consensus -35 sequence but also a consensus Pribnow box sequence. This may explain the higher efficiency of this hybrid promoter with respect to either one of the parental promoters.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1988

Development of a trpE promoter-strength measuring system and its use in comparison of the trpEDCBA, trpR and aroH promoters.

An expression system was developed for measuring in vivo promoter strength at the single copy level and this system was used to compare the trp, aroH and trpR promoters. This system employs trpE enzyme activity as a measure of promoter strength and lacZ expression for internal copy number reference. Promoter-containing fragments are inserted into a cloning vector and subsequently recombined on to phage lambda by genetic exchange. Single lysogens are then prepared and used in promoter-strength analyses. The strength of several promoters was determined using this system. Among the promoters tested, the Escherichia coli trpEDCBA promoter was the strongest; it was four times more active than the lacUV5 promoter and about ten times stronger than the trpR and aroH promoters. To validate measurement of trpE enzyme activity as an indicator of promoter strength, trpE enzyme activity was compared with the level of trpE mRNA. There was excellent correspondence between the two, suggesting that with this system trpE enzyme activity accurately reflects promoter strength. We also examined a homologous promoter-strength measuring system in which the promoter-cloning plasmid lacked a 104 base-pair DNA spacer that was present immediately downstream from the promoter-cloning site in our preferred system. We found that the spacer was essential; the transcribed region accompanying a cloned promoter apparently affected trpE translational efficiency and/or trpE mRNA stability.

Anthranilate Synthase↗
PubMed1988

Promoter-promoter interactions influencing transcription of the yeast mitochondrial gene, Oli 1, coding for ATPase subunit 9. Cis and trans effects.

The gene for ATPase subunit 9 of yeast mitochondria (Oli 1) contains two promoter sequences (Op1 and Op2) separated by 78 nucleotides. Both promoters are transcribed in vivo and in vitro though with different efficiency. The upstream promoter (Op1) is 12-15 times stronger than the downstream promoter (Op2), and this difference in promoter activity is partly attributable to the influence of the +2 nucleotide (Biswas, T. K., and Getz, G. S. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 270-274). In addition, the presence of the strong promoter (Op1) in close proximity to the weak promoter (Op2) partially inhibits the expression of the latter (Op2). The relative orientation of the two promoters has no influence on these inhibitory effects. When both promoters are present in the same reaction mixture, the strong promoter always competes effectively with the weak promoter for limited RNA polymerase (trans or competition effect). When the two promoters are present in the same plasmid, there is an inhibitory interaction between them that decreases as the distance between the two promoters increases (cis or position effect). Thus, the difference between the activities of a strong and a weak mitochondrial promoter in tandem is a function of two effects, the trans or competition effect and the cis or position-related effect. A model for promoter-promoter interactions is proposed.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2001

The lung tumor promoter, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), causes chronic inflammation in promotion-sensitive BALB/cByJ mice but not in promotion-resistant CXB4 mice.

An inflammatory response accompanies the reversible pneumotoxicity caused by butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) administration to mice. Lung tumor formation is promoted by BHT administration following an initiating agent in BALB/cByJ mice, but not in CXB4 mice. To assess the contribution of inflammation to this differential susceptibility, we quantitatively characterized inflammation after one 150 mg/kg body weight, followed by three weekly 200 mg/kg ip injections of BHT into male mice of both strains. This examination included inflammatory cell infiltrate and protein contents in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 expression in lung extracts, and PGE(2) and PGI(2) production by isolated bronchiolar Clara cells. BAL macrophage and lymphocyte numbers increased in BALB mice (P<0.0007 and 0.02, respectively), as did BAL protein content (P<0.05), COX-1 and COX-2 expression (P<0.05 for each), and PGI(2) production (P<0.05); conversely, these indices were not perturbed by BHT in CXB4 mice. BALB mice fed aspirin (400 mg/kg of chow) for two weeks prior to BHT treatment had reduced inflammatory cell infiltration. Our results support a hypothesis that resistance to BHT-induced inflammation in CXB4 mice accounts, at least in part, for the lack of effect of BHT on lung tumor multiplicity in this strain.

6-Ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha↗
PubMed1998

Comparative sequence analysis of the mouse and human transferrin promoters: hormonal regulation of the transferrin promoter in Sertoli cells.

Cell-specific expression of the iron-binding protein transferrin is in part mediated through the regulation of its promoter. Although all cells require iron from serum transferrin produced by hepatocytes, cells that create a blood barrier such as Sertoli cells in the testis and choroid plexus epithelium in the brain also express the transferrin gene to provide iron to cells sequestered within the serum-free environment. The current study provides a complete sequence of the 3-kb mouse transferrin promoter and makes a comparison with the sequence available for the human transferrin promoter. Conserved regulatory elements between these two species are identified and speculated to be potentially important response elements for the regulation of the transferrin gene. The proximal 90 bp of the mouse and human transferrin promoter was found to be 80% homologous. The previously identified protected regions in the proximal human promoter also were conserved in the mouse transferrin promoter. Our sequence analysis data revealed that an E-box response element is also conserved between mouse and human promoters. Deletion mutants of the mouse transferrin promoter were generated in CAT reporter constructs to study the regulation of the transferrin promoter in Sertoli cells. As in the case of the human transferrin promoter, the mouse 581-bp proximal transferrin promoter was sufficient to obtain basal expression. A putative cyclic AMP response element (CRE) in the minimal promoter may be needed for follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) actions mediated via cyclic AMP. Interestingly, other regulatory agents such as the testicular paracrine factor PModS used elements in the upstream region. A repressor was identified 2.5 kb upstream from the start site of translation. Combined observations suggest for the first time that a minimal promoter is sufficient for basal transcription, but the upstream regions of the promoter are needed for the hormonal regulation of the transferrin gene in Sertoli cells. Conserved response elements between the mouse and human sequences identify potentially important regulatory elements of the promoter and are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

In vivo studies on the interaction of RNA polymerase-sigma 54 with the Klebsiella pneumoniae and Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoters. The role of NifA in the formation of an open promoter complex.

Transcription from the Klebsiella pneumoniae and Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoters requires the positive control protein NifA and the alternative sigma factor sigma 54, encoded by the rpoN gene. Transcription from the K. pneumoniae nifH promoter is fully dependent upon NifA bound at the upstream activator sequence (UAS) whereas the R. meliloti nifH promoter can be efficiently activated in the absence of this sequence and can also be activated by a mutant form of NifA unable to bind the UAS. The in vivo interaction of RNA polymerase-sigma 54 with these promoters was examined using dimethyl sulphate footprinting. The R. meliloti nifH promoter but not the K. pneumoniae nifH promoter showed sigma 54-dependent methylation protection of guanine residues at -14, -25 and -26, the most conserved nucleotides characteristic of sigma 54-dependent promoters. A mutant derivative of the K. pneumoniae nifH promoter bearing transitions at positions from -15 to -17 showed sigma 54-dependent methylation protection of guanines -13, -24 and -25. The enhanced interaction of the RNA polymerase-sigma 54 with this mutant promoter correlates with its increased level of activation by a form of NifA unable to bind the UAS. Use of in vivo KMnO4 footprinting to detect single-stranded pyrimidine residues and in vivo methylation protection demonstrated that the sigma 54-dependent protection observed in the R. meliloti and mutant K. pneumoniae nifH promoter results from the formation of a closed promoter complex. The isomerization of the pre-existing closed complex to an open promoter form, as judged by the local denaturation of promoter DNA which rendered sequences from +5 to -10 reactive towards KMnO4, was shown to be fully dependent on NifA. We propose a model in which the fidelity of activation of sigma 54-dependent promoters relies on a weak activator-independent interaction of RNA polymerase-sigma 54 with the promoter. A specific interaction of the appropriate activator with its respective UAS is then required for the positive control protein to facilitate open complex formation.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2000

Thyroid hormone, glucagon, and medium-chain fatty acids regulate transcription initiated from promoter 1 and promoter 2 of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase-alpha gene in chick embryo hepatocytes.

High-carbohydrate feeding and triiodothyronine (T3) increase the abundance of acetyl-CoA carboxylase-alpha (ACC alpha) mRNA in avian hepatocytes, whereas starvation, glucagon, and medium-chain fatty acids decrease the abundance of ACC alpha mRNA. These changes in ACC alpha mRNA levels are mediated by alterations in the rate of transcription of the ACC alpha gene. In liver, ACC alpha transcription is initiated from two promoters, promoter 1 and promoter 2, resulting in transcripts that contain heterogeneity in their 5'-untranslated regions. Here, we investigated the role of promoter 1 and promoter 2 in mediating nutrient- and hormone-induced changes in ACC alpha mRNA abundance by measuring the level of transcripts expressed from promoter 1 and promoter 2 using a ribonuclease protection assay. The results indicated that both promoter 1 and promoter 2 were regulated by starvation/refeeding in livers of intact chicks and by T3, glucagon, and medium-chain fatty acids in chick embryo hepatocyte cultures and that alterations in the activity of promoter 2 accounted for a greater proportion of the changes in total ACC alpha mRNA abundance caused by nutrient and hormone treatment. Five DNase-hypersensitive sites were also identified between -500 and +1 bp relative to the transcription start site of promoter 2 in livers of intact chicks and in chick embryo hepatocyte cultures. In transient transfection analyses, this region of DNase hypersensitivity conferred regulation of transcription by T3, glucagon, and medium-chain fatty acids in chick embryo hepatocytes. Data from this study demonstrate that diet-induced changes in the activities of promoter 1 and promoter 2 in livers of intact chicks are mimicked in chick embryo hepatocyte cultures by manipulating the concentrations of T3, glucagon and medium-chain fatty acids in the culture medium and that cis-acting sequences mediating the effects of nutrients and hormones on promoter 2 activity are located immediately upstream of the transcription start site of this promoter.

Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase↗
PubMed2001

CBF/NF-Y functions both in nucleosomal disruption and transcription activation of the chromatin-assembled topoisomerase IIalpha promoter. Transcription activation by CBF/NF-Y in chromatin is dependent on the promoter structure.

To understand the role of CCAAT-binding factor (CBF) in transcription in the context of chromatin-assembled DNA, we used regularly spaced nucleosomal DNA using topoisomerase IIalpha (topo IIalpha) and alpha2(1) collagen promoter templates, which were subsequently reconstituted in an in vitro transcription reaction. Binding of CBF to the nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter containing four CBF-binding sites disrupted the regular nucleosomal structure not only in the promoter region containing the CBF-binding sites but also in the downstream region over the transcription start site. In contrast, no nucleosome disruption was observed in a mutant topo IIalpha promoter containing mutations in all CBF-binding sites. Interestingly, CBF also activated transcription from nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter. In this experiment, a promoter containing one wild-type CBF-binding site was activated very weakly, whereas the promoter containing mutations in all sites was not activated by CBF. A truncated CBF that lacked the glutamine-rich domains did not activate transcription from nucleosomal wild-type topo IIalpha promoter but disrupted the nucleosomal structure about as much as did the binding of full-length CBF. Two nucleosomal mouse alpha2(1) collagen promoter DNAs, one containing a single and the other containing four CBF- binding sites, were also reconstituted in an in vitro transcription reaction. None of the nucleosomal collagen promoters was activated by CBF. However, both of these collagen promoters were activated by CBF when the transcription reaction was performed using naked DNA templates. Binding of CBF to the nucleosomal collagen promoter containing four binding sites disrupted the nucleosomal structure, similarly as observed in the topo IIalpha promoter. Altogether this study indicates that CBF-mediated nucleosomal disruption occurred independently of transcription activation. It also suggests that specific promoter structure may play a role in the CBF-mediated transcription activation of nucleosomal topo IIalpha promoter template.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1995

Stimulation of the mouse rRNA gene promoter by a distal spacer promoter.

We show that the mouse ribosomal DNA (rDNA) spacer promoter acts in vivo to stimulate transcription from a downstream rRNA gene promoter. This augmentation of mammalian RNA polymerase I transcription is observed in transient-transfection experiments with three different rodent cell lines, under noncompetitive as well as competitive transcription conditions, over a wide range of template concentrations, whether or not the enhancer repeats alone stimulate or repress expression from the downstream gene promoter. Stimulation of gene promoter transcription by the spacer promoter requires the rDNA enhancer sequences to be present between the spacer promoter and gene promoter and to be oriented as in native rDNA. Stimulation also requires that the spacer promoter be oriented toward the enhancer and gene promoter. However, stimulation does not correlate with transcription from the spacer promoter because the level of stimulation is not altered by either insertion of a functional mouse RNA polymerase I transcriptional terminator between the spacer promoter and enhancer or replacement with a much more active heterologous polymerase I promoter. Further analysis with a series of mutated spacer promoters indicates that the stimulatory activity does not reside in the major promoter domains but requires the central region of the promoter that has been correlated with enhancer responsiveness in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Light chain promoter regions in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss: function of a classical and an atypical Ig promoter.

Three rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) light chain isotypes (L1, L2 and L3) have been identified at the cDNA level. Genomic clones have previously been obtained for L1 and L2, revealing different structures of the V/J/C clusters and divergent putative promoter regions. While the L1 putative promoter has a classical Ig promoter structure with TATA, E-box, and octamer, the L2 putative promoter lacks typical features of the Ig promoter. The L2 putative promoter region contains a kappa-Y motif, an E-box and two putative non-consensus TATA boxes. In this study the isolation of a genomic clone that encompassed a VJC cluster of the recently described L3 isotype is described. The structure of the L3 putative promoter region is very similar to that of the L1 promoter. The transcriptional activities of the promoters of the trout L1 and L2 isotypes were compared. The promoter region of the L1 isotype showed a strong and predictable B cell-specific activity. Despite the unusual structure of the L2 V gene promoter, the transcriptional activity of it was much stronger in B-cells as compared to non B-cells. Deletion analyses of L2 promoter constructs showed that the region containing the kappa-Y element is critical for the transcriptional activity of the L2 promoter. Both L1 and L2 promoters can cooperate with a B cell-specific enhancer from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Characterization of human TCR Vbeta gene promoter. Role of the dodecamer motif in promoter activity.

During T-lymphocyte development, the T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) gene expression is controlled by its promoter and enhancer elements and regulated in tissue- and development stage-specific manner. To uncover the promoter function and to define positive and negative regulatory elements in TCR gene promoters, the promoter activities from 13 human TCR Vbeta genes were determined by the transient transfection system and luciferase reporter assay. Although most of the TCR Vbeta gene promoters that we tested are inactive by themselves, some promoters were found to be constitutively strong. Among them, Vbeta6.7 is the strongest. 5'-Deletion and fragmentation experiments have narrowed the full promoter activity of Vbeta6.7 to a fragment of 147 base pairs immediately 5' to the transcription initiation site. A decanucleotide motif with the consensus sequence AGTGAYRTCA has been found to be conserved in most TCR Vbeta gene promoters. There are three such decamer motifs in the promoter region of Vbeta6.7, and the contribution of each such motif to the promoter activity has been examined. Further site-directed mutagenesis analyses showed that: 1) when two Ts in the decamer were mutated, the promoter activity was totally abolished; 2) when two additional nucleotides 3' to the end of decamer were mutated, the promoter activity was decreased to two-thirds of the full level; and 3) when the element with the sequence AGTGATGTCACT was inserted into other promoters, the original weak promoters become very strong. Taken together, our data suggest that the positive regulatory element in Vbeta6.7 should be considered a dodecamer rather than a decamer and that it confers strong basal transcriptional activity on TCR Vbeta genes.

Alleles↗
PubMed2000

Transcriptional regulation of the yeast PHO8 promoter in comparison to the coregulated PHO5 promoter.

Expression of the PHO8 and PHO5 genes that encode a nonspecific alkaline and acid phosphatase, respectively, is regulated in response to the P(i) concentration in the medium by the same transcription factors. Upon induction by phosphate starvation, both promoters undergo characteristic chromatin remodeling, yet the extent of remodeling at the PHO8 promoter is significantly lower than at PHO5. Despite the coordinate regulation of the two promoters, the PHO8 promoter is almost 10 times weaker than PHO5. Here we show that of two Pho4 binding sites that had been previously mapped at the PHO8 promoter in vitro, only the high affinity one, UASp2, is functional in vivo. Activation of the PHO8 promoter is partially Pho2-dependent. However, unlike at PHO5, Pho4 can bind strongly to its binding site in the absence of Pho2 and remodel chromatin in a Pho2-independent manner. Replacement of the inactive UASp1 element by the UASp1 element from the PHO5 promoter results in more extensive chromatin remodeling and a concomitant 2-fold increase in promoter activity. In contrast, replacement of the high affinity UASp2 site with the corresponding site from PHO5 precludes chromatin remodeling completely and as a consequence promoter activation, despite efficient binding of Pho4 to this site. Deletion of the promoter region normally covered by nucleosomes -3 and -2 results in a 2-fold increase in promoter activity, further supporting a repressive role of these nucleosomes. These data show that there can be strong binding of Pho4 to a UAS element without any chromatin remodeling and promoter activation. The close correlation between promoter activity and the extent of chromatin disruption strongly suggests that the low level of PHO8 induction in comparison with PHO5 is partly due to the inability of Pho4 to achieve complete chromatin remodeling at this promoter.

Acid Phosphatase↗
PubMed1997

Striking conformational similarities between the transcription promoters of Thogoto and influenza A viruses: evidence for intrastrand base pairing in the 5' promoter arm.

In the accompanying report, we describe an in vitro polymerase assay based on reconstituted Thogoto virus (THOV) cores which provided evidence of a double-stranded vRNA promoter consisting of both the 3' and 5' sequences of vRNA (M. B. Leahy, J. T. Dessens, and P. A. Nuttall, J. Virol. 71:8347-8351, 1997). This system was used to investigate further the THOV vRNA promoter structure by using short, synthetic vRNA promoters. The results obtained show that interstrand base pairing between residues 10 and 11 of the 3' promoter arm with residues 11 and 12 of the 5' promoter arm, respectively, is important for promoter activity. In addition, intrastrand base pairing between residues 2 and 3 with residues 9 and 8 of the 5' promoter arm, respectively, was shown to be involved in promoter activity, while no evidence of intrastrand base pairing between residues 2 and 9 of the 3' promoter arm was obtained. These observations are consistent with a hook-like structure in the 5' promoter arm of the THOV promoter. The THOV cores were able to transcribe an influenza A virus (FLUA) vRNA-like promoter, as well as hybrid THOV-FLUA promoters. Hence, the THOV and FLUA vRNA promoters appear to be both structurally and functionally similar.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Differential promoter usage in prolactin receptor gene expression: hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 binds to and activates the promoter preferentially active in the liver.

Characterization of the rat PRL receptor (PRLR) gene has revealed three separate untranslated exon 1 sequences, each associated with a different transcription start site and 5'-flanking sequence. We show by RT-PCR that exon 1A is expressed primarily in liver but is also detectable in ovary and mammary gland. Exon 1B expression is observed exclusively in the ovary, whereas exon 1C is expressed in all three tissues. Transient transfection of luciferase reporter constructs containing parts of the 5'-flanking regions (0.3-1.1 kb) of exon 1A, 1B, and 1C, respectively, showed activity of the 1A promoter in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, the human hepatoma cell line, HepG2, and the rat hepatoma cell line, H4II, which was 10- to 14-fold increased compared with the activity of the promoter-less luciferase vector. No activity of the 1A promoter was detected in the human mammary cell line, T-47D. Relative to a vector containing the Simian virus 40 (SV40) promoter, the 1A promoter had 20% activity in H4II cells and 1-3% activity in CHO and HepG2 cells. The 1B promoter produced a 6.1-fold increase of luciferase activity in CHO cells (approximately 2% of the SV40 promoter), whereas no significant activity was detected in HepG2, H4II, and T-47D cells. The 1C promoter was strongly active in T-47D cells (approximately 64-fold over control) and moderately active in the other cell lines tested (9- to 13-fold over control). 5'-Deletion analysis of the 1A promoter revealed that a fragment containing -83/ +81 bp, relative to the transcription start site, was sufficient to drive transcription in hepatoma cells, whereas this construct was inactive in CHO cells. Cotransfection of CHO cells with the -83/+81 construct and an expression vector encoding the liver-enriched transcription factor, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF4), revealed a dose-dependent transactivation of the proximal 1A promoter with a maximal stimulation of approximately 10-fold. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed binding of HNF4 to the sequence -14/+24 of the 1A promoter, and mutational analysis revealed that the sequence GGGCAAAGTCA at position +11/+21 is required for this binding. We conclude that the 1A, 1B, and 1C promoters of the PRLR gene are used in a cell type- dependent way that may play a role in differential hormonal regulation of the gene. In particular, we have shown that HNF4 operates on the proximal 1A promoter and may be responsible, in combination with other factors, for the increased activity of this promoter in adult female liver.

Animals↗
PubMed1982

Responses of preneoplastic epidermal cells to tumor promoters and growth factors: use of promoter-resistant variants for mechanism studies.

The JB6 mouse epidermal cell model system is being used to study the mechanism of promotion of transformation. Promotion of anchorage independence in JB6 cells occurs in response to second-stage but not first-stage promoters, and is inhibited by inhibitors of second-stage not first-stage promotion. A number of variants that are resistant to the phorbol diester TPA have been derived. Some are resistant to plateau density mitogenic stimulation by TPA; others are resistant to promotion of anchorage independence by TPA. Some of the mitogen-resistant variants were promotable by TPA, thus ruling out a requirement for TPA mitogenesis in promotion of transformation in JB6 cells. TPA promotable clones were also sensitive to mezerein and EGF while the TPA nonpromotable variants were also resistant to mezerein and EGF, suggesting that sensitivity to promoters in these JB6 cells is determined at a level distal to receptor binding. Promotion sensitivity did not require available EGF receptors since two TPA promotable variants were EGF receptorless. The mitogenic response of JB6 cells to TPA may however be mediated by EGF since four of four mitogen-resistant variants showed low to zero levels of EGF binding. Tumor promoting phorbol esters produce specific changes in cellular gangliosides. Certain of these changes occur in promotable but not nonpromotable variants of JB6 cells, suggesting that ganglioside changes may be involved in the process of promotion of transformation.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Biological assays for irritant, tumor-initiating and tumor-promoting activities. II. Standardized initiation/promotion protocol and semiquantitative estimation of promoting (or initiating) potencies in skin of NMRI mice.

A versatile standardized protocol of initiation/promotion of skin is described using 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene as initiator and diterpene esters as promoters in 28 female NMRI mice per promoter (or initiator) dose group including appropriate positive and negative controls ("standardized initiation/promotion protocol 28" or "protocol 28"). To monitor the weekly tumor responses, the tumor rate Tr and the tumor yield Ty were recorded per dose group collectively as a measure of the tumor-promoting (or initiating) activity of individual compounds; similarly the general health status of the group was controlled twice weekly by collective weighing of the dose group and recorded daily by the survival rate Sr. Synoptic consideration of Tr, Ty and the promoter dose (or initiator dose) at a set time period of exposure was used for the semiquantitative estimation of the relative tumor-promoting (or initiating) potency, referring to a high-potency promoter (or initiator) as standard. The full scope of utilization of "protocol 28" to determine comparable individual promoting activities and -at 24 weeks of exposure--relative tumor-promoting potencies (rtpp24) is demonstrated in typical examples with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA) as well as various other phorbol esters as promoters. For estimation of promoting potencies TPA is rated a rtpp24 of + + + +. The other phorbol derivatives exhibit rtpp24 between 0 and + + + +. In this manner, "protocol 28" was verified in 1000 promoter dose groups (i.e. 28,000 mice) to determine tumor-promoting activities of individual diterpene esters and partly also their rtpp24. Grading of tumor-promoting potencies of diterpene esters in skin by rtpp24 proved useful for evaluating the relative environmental risk involved in exposure to various diterpene esters as well as in comparative mechanistic investigations including structure/activity relationships. As an example, the correlation of irritancy and tumor-promoting potency of certain diterpene esters in epithelial tissue, postulated previously from essentially qualitative data, is verified in semiquantitative terms by comparison--as a typical example--of the irritancy of phorbol esters on the ear and of the corresponding rtpp24 on the back skin of NMRI mice.

9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene↗
PubMed1994

Synergistic interaction between the non-phorbol ester-type promoter mirex and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate in mouse skin tumor promotion.

Mirex, an organochlorine pesticide and non-genotoxic rodent hepatocarcinogen, is also a potent non-phorbol ester-type promoter of mouse skin tumors. Mirex, unlike most other skin tumor promoters, is not a significant epidermal hyperplasiogen even at a maximally promoting dose (200 nmol). Experiments described here examined whether tumor promotion by mirex and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) are mediated through different mechanisms as indicated by their additivity when co-applied to 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene (DMBA, 200 nmol)-initiated female CD-1 mouse skin. Instead of the additive response of 14 plus 5 tumors/mouse predicted from mice promoted for 20 weeks (2x/week) with either mirex (200 nmol) or TPA (2 nmol) respectively, their co-application yielded 35 tumors/mouse. This synergy with TPA was specific to mirex since a structurally related compound, chlordecone (Kepone) was inactive. Mirex plus TPA-promoted papillomas contained a c-Ha-ras A182-->T mutation as frequently (13/14) as those promoted by mirex or TPA alone, suggesting that these DMBA-initiated/co-promoted papillomas were not atypical in this genotypic marker. Promotional synergy with mirex was only observed with a submaximal promoting dose of 2 nmol TPA; 5 or 8 nmol TPA plus mirex gave additive or less tumor multiplicities. This synergistic multiplicity with mirex plus 2 nmol TPA (35 tumors/mouse) approximated the sum of individual responses to 200 nmol mirex (14 tumors/mouse) and the maximally promoting dose of TPA (12 nmol), 24 tumors/mouse, suggesting that mirex potentiated the promotional activity of TPA, as well as promoted through a mirex-specific mechanism. Epidermal DNA synthesis induced by 2 nmol TPA was potentiated by mirex, further supporting a role for mirex in potentiation of epidermal TPA activity. Collectively, these studies suggest that mirex affects two possibly related responses: (i) promotion through a distinct mirex-specific mechanism, and (ii) potentiation of a mechanism mediating the promotional activity of TPA.

Adenine↗
PubMed1987

Kinetic analysis of T7 RNA polymerase-promoter interactions with small synthetic promoters.

Specific interactions between T7 RNA polymerase and its promoter have been studied by a simple steady-state kinetic assay using synthetic oligonucleotide promoters that produce a short five-base message. A series of promoters with upstream lengths extending to promoter positions -19, -17, -14, and -12 show that promoters extending to -19 and -17 produce very specific transcripts with initiation rate constant Kcat = 50 min-1 and a Michaelis constant Km = 0.02 microM, indicating that the consensus sequence to position -17 is sufficient for maximum promoter usage. Shortening the upstream region of the promoter to -14 substantially increases Km (0.3 microM) but does not significantly reduce the maximum velocity (kcat = 30 min-1). Finally, truncation of the promoter at position -12 results in extremely low levels of specific transcription. The coding and noncoding strands appear to make different contributions to promoter recognition. Although the double-stranded promoter of upstream length -12 is very poor as a transcription template, extension of only the noncoding strand to -17 very significantly improves both Kcat and Km. In contrast, extension of only the coding strand results in no significant improvement. Substitution of an AT base pair at position -10 by CG (as found in T3 RNA polymerase promoters) produces a 10-fold increase in Km, with little effect on Kcat. Comparison of two promoters containing a base pair mismatch at this site (AG or CT) demonstrates that promoter recognition is very sensitive to the nature of the base on the noncoding strand and is only slightly affected by the presence of a mismatch created by a wrong base in the coding strands.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Base Sequence↗