Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Program Evaluation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

GFPE: gene-finding program evaluation.

Gene-finding program evaluation (GFPE) is a set of Java classes for evaluating gene-finding programs. A command-line interface is also provided. Inputs to the program include the sequence data (in FASTA format), annotations of "actual" sequence features, and annotations of "predicted" sequence features. Annotation files are in the General Feature Format promoted by the Sanger center. GFPE calculates a number of metrics of accuracy of predictions at three levels:the coding level, the exon level, and the protein level.

Computational Biology↗
PubMed1999

A method to obtain a randomized control group where it seems impossible. A case study in program evaluation.

Randomization of program participants into control and experimental groups is often not feasible in field settings. The researcher's desire to evaluate a program with a rigorous experimental design is often incompatible with the objective of serving the expressed needs of the program participants. However, opportunities do arise when a randomized control group can be constructed without disregarding the participants' wish to be included in the treatment group. This article describes a method that uses the participants' compliance to program instructions as a means of classifying participants and, thereby, obtains a randomized control group for a subset of participants. A large smoking intervention project is used to illustrate two variations of this method.

Algorithms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Program evaluation. Part 1: Four generations of theory.

Program evaluation is necessary for understanding and improving educational programs in nursing, but it is frequently surrounded by a climate of unease and perplexity. This first article in a two-part series reviews and evaluates extant models of program evaluation using Guba and Lincoln's four generations of evaluation as a theoretical framework. The second article (November/December 1990) examines the state-of-the-art of program evaluation in nursing education and proposes implementation of a responsive model of program evaluation in schools of nursing. The series aims to foster more dynamic, efficient program analysis, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of nursing's educational programs.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Developing and implementing an ongoing competency evaluation program for rehabilitation nurses.

Ongoing competency evaluation of all nursing staff in rehabilitation settings is mandated by regulatory bodies. Rehabilitation nurse educators are challenged to design competency evaluation programs that meet regulatory standards, promote the professional development of rehabilitation nurses, and are cost-effective. The competence of rehabilitation nurses is maintained through a combination of ongoing assessment and education activities. Key components of program development include identifying critical nursing and rehabilitation nursing skills; developing an efficient documentation system; designing the evaluation, program promotion, and implementation activities; and evaluating the program. The strategies described meet administrative and educational needs.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A program evaluation instrument.

The evaluation of education programs provides valuable information for the program coordinator or instructor. The Program Evaluation Instrument (PEI) was developed with the use of various educational settings and subjects. The PEI provides a valid, reliable instrument that is generalizable to a variety of programs.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2003

Ethical review of health promotion program evaluation proposals.

Some policies state that program evaluation falls within the domain of administrative research that does not require review by an ethics review board. We propose that some health promotion program evaluations include at least one element of research and can be distinguished from quality assurance. Although American and Canadian evaluation societies provide important guidelines and standards for evaluation practitioners, processes for accountability to the public are provided by research ethics boards. The field of health promotion is, by its nature, replete with challenges to existing research ethics boards. Given the dearth of published literature on the ethics of health promotion evaluation or practice, the field could benefit from the open debate that reviews of proposals would encourage.

Canada↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Program evaluation within a health promotion framework.

Program evaluation can assist in assessing the conceptualization, design, implementation and utility of health promotion action. Evaluation of health promotion, with multiple strategies combining individual, social and policy action, lends itself to an evaluation-as-politics paradigm. Consideration of the interests of all major stakeholders, use of a series of related studies, and a commitment to multiple methods and multiple perspectives characterize this paradigm. Simple, practical research that is adequate for answering relevant questions is required. The program evaluator is not a neutral, scientific observer--he/she is a participant in the political arena along with other stakeholder groups. A model of the areas of interest in evaluation of health promotion, some potential evaluation questions, and a health promotion impact evaluation model are presented to emphasize unique aspects involved in evaluation of health promotion action. The evaluator can take a proactive role and challenge problems in conception and implementation of health promotion action. He/she can advocate for health promotion.

Health Policy↗
PubMed1996

Program evaluation findings of an intensive early intervention program.

An intensive early intervention program was evaluated through determining child gains made by 44 children with special needs in cognition, gross-motor, fine-motor, receptive language, and expressive language domains. Gains were examined for the total group and two subgroups based upon their delays at pretesting. Analyses comparing actual to predicted posttest scores for the total group did not reveal statistically significant gains in any domains. Findings by subgroup revealed that in cognition, gross-motor, and fine-motor domains, the group with less severe impairments made more progress. Results were interpreted in light of constraints imposed by the measurement tools and discussed in terms of policy implications and the limitations involved in conducting quality program evaluation in early intervention.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Program evaluation: an ongoing systematic process.

The time immediately following an accreditation visit is ideal to reevaluate and update the plan for ongoing systematic program evaluation. This article demonstrates how use of an evaluation framework, existing nursing program resources, data, and a timeline can be integral to an ongoing program evaluation plan. Guidelines provided by the accrediting body can be the template for the evaluation plan, with tables or templates from a self-study providing an efficient summary of each outcome measure and a plan for action. Committees vital to evaluation are curriculum, policy and by-laws, program evaluation, and administration. With commitment and involvement from all faculty, program evaluation can result in maintenance and refinement of a quality nursing program.

Accreditation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Quality outcomes and program evaluation in nursing education: an overview of the journey.

Program evaluation, accreditation, and ongoing quality improvement are complex, interrelated processes in nursing education. The purpose of this article is to provide a general overview of the process of evaluation and accreditation with continuous quality improvement that is required for formal nursing education programs in the United States. This article discusses core components of nursing program evaluation, regional and national accreditation, state boards of nursing and licensure, and the role of specialty certification in nursing. A case study of a private college of nursing illustrates the role of program evaluation and quality improvement in nursing education.

Education, Nursing↗
PubMed1995

Program evaluation. Key to success.

In searching for the ideal model to deliver quality patient care in a cost-effective manner, nursing has developed many patient care delivery models. These models, often lacking an evaluation component, were not optimally implemented. The authors present evaluation as a dynamic process resulting in ongoing changes, which strengthen a system. Focusing on alternative approaches, roles of key players, and evaluation procedures, specific guidelines for effectively evaluating a program are presented.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Use of program logic models in the Southern Rural Access Program evaluation.

The Southern Rural Access Program (SRAP) evaluation team used program logic models to clarify grantees' activities, objectives, and timelines. This information was used to benchmark data from grantees' progress reports to assess the program's successes. This article presents a brief background on the use of program logic models--essentially charts or diagrams specifying a program's planned activities, objectives, and goals--for evaluating and managing a program. It discusses the structure of the logic models chosen for the SRAP and how the model concept was introduced to the grantees to promote acceptance and use of the models. The article describes how the models helped clarify the program's objectives and helped lead agencies plan and manage the many program initiatives and subcontractors in their states. Models also provided a framework for grantees to report their progress to the National Program Office and evaluators and promoted the evaluators' visibility and acceptance by the grantees. Program logics, however, increased grantees' reporting requirements and demanded substantial time of the evaluators. Program logic models, on balance, proved their merit in the SRAP through their contributions to its management and evaluation and by providing a better understanding of the program's initiatives, successes, and potential impact.

Benchmarking↗
PubMed1996

Obstacles to conducting program evaluations: implications for public health evaluators.

This article presents a number of obstacles to conducting program evaluations which include: the "word" evaluation itself, the politics of evaluation, inadequate resources, the tendency of organizations to resist change, and a lack of understanding of the context of program evaluations. Underpinning these obstacles is the longstanding definitional dilemma between program evaluation and social science research. Although the article's implications are directed toward public health evaluators, they are generalizable to other evaluators in other disciplines. These obstacles highlight the fact that a major role of any evaluator is to confront and negotiate successfully around them.

Health Services Research↗