Ashes to ashes: the significance of preventing lung cancer through primary prevention and health promotion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Canada↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Primary Prevention”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Joint occupational and environmental pollution prevention strategies: a model for primary prevention.
Occupational and environmental health issues are not always considered simultaneously when attempting to reduce or eliminate hazardous materials from our environment. Methods used to decrease exposure to hazardous chemicals in the workplace often lead to increased exposure in the environment and to the community outside the workplace. Conversely, efforts to control emissions of hazardous chemicals into the environment often lead to increased exposure to the workers inside the plant. There are government regulations in place that ensure a safe work environment or a safe outside environment; however, there is little integration of both approaches when considering the public's health as a whole. This article examines some of the reasons behind this dichotomy, focusing on the regulatory and policy frameworks with respect to workplace and environment that have resulted in the inability of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to coordinate their efforts to protect public health. The components of the Pollution Prevention Act and its potential to serve as a model for integrating occupational and environmental health are discussed. Limitations regarding enforcement of pollution prevention, as well as its disconnection from the work environment are equally highlighted. The article finishes by examining the barriers to integrating the occupational and environmental health paradigms and the promotion of primary prevention in public health.
Journal Article↗
Etiologic evidence and primary prevention of cancer.
For many decades, primary prevention of cancer was implemented on the basis of evidence for a causal relationship between exposure and human cancer that took into consideration biological plausibility, but did not depend on the degree of understanding of the underlying mechanisms. One of the credos of public health is that primary prevention can be implemented before reaching a complete understanding of mechanisms that could confirm/explain causality. Measures of primary prevention are taken on the basis of what is recognized as causative factors of human cancer. The most authoritative lists of recognized human carcinogens are those compiled from the evaluations of carcinogenic risk carried out by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the evaluations that the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) publishes in its periodical Report on Carcinogens. Knowledge of mechanisms is accumulating at a fast pace, and although it has not yet led to the definition of an efficient strategy for primary prevention for the majority of cancer cases, it may drive the scientific establishment toward a high-risk approach to prevention. The most reasonable and socially acceptable development of primary prevention should be the blending of a population approach; that is, the shifting of the distribution of risk factors across an entire population in a favorable direction (e.g., a general decrease of the levels of exposure to environmental carcinogens) with the high-risk approach that will concern individuals with extreme values of genetically determined weaknesses in the interactions with the environment.
Carcinogens↗
Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This guideline provides an overview of the evidence on various established and potential stroke risk factors and provides recommendations for the reduction of stroke risk. METHODS: Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of each writer's previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee. The writers used systematic literature reviews (covering the time period since the last review published in 2001 up to January 2005), reference to previously published guidelines, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulate recommendations based on standard American Heart Association criteria. All members of the writing group had numerous opportunities to comment in writing on the recommendations and approved the final version of this document. The guideline underwent extensive peer review before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. RESULTS: Schemes for assessing a person's risk of a first stroke were evaluated. Risk factors or risk markers for a first stroke were classified according to their potential for modification (nonmodifiable, modifiable, or potentially modifiable) and strength of evidence (well documented or less well documented). Nonmodifiable risk factors include age, sex, low birth weight, race/ethnicity, and genetic factors. Well-documented and modifiable risk factors include hypertension, exposure to cigarette smoke, diabetes, atrial fibrillation and certain other cardiac conditions, dyslipidemia, carotid artery stenosis, sickle cell disease, postmenopausal hormone therapy, poor diet, physical inactivity, and obesity and body fat distribution. Less well-documented or potentially modifiable risk factors include the metabolic syndrome, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, oral contraceptive use, sleep-disordered breathing, migraine headache, hyperhomocysteinemia, elevated lipoprotein(a), elevated lipoprotein-associated phospholipase, hypercoagulability, inflammation, and infection. Data on the use of aspirin for primary stroke prevention are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive evidence is available identifying a variety of specific factors that increase the risk of a first stroke and providing strategies for reducing that risk.
Brain Ischemia↗
[Randomised clinical trial of an intensive intervention into life-styles of patients with hyperfibrinogenaemia in primary prevention of cardiovascular pathology in primary health care].
OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of an intensive programme to modify life-style on levels of plasma fibrinogen in patients without cardiovascular pathology, with high fibrinogen and normal cholesterol levels. To analyse whether the effect on fibrinogen is independent, or otherwise, of the effect on lipids. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial with a control. SETTING: 11 health districts in L'Hospitalet de Llobregat and Barcelona. PARTICIPANTS: 436 patients will be included, 218 individuals between 35 and 75 years old in each group, and without cardiovascular pathology (ischaemic cardiopathy, cerebral vascular accident or peripheral arteriopathy), with hyperfibrinogenaemia (fibrinogen > 300 mg/dL) and with plasma control < 250 mg/dL. INTERVENTIONS: One group of patients will receive an intensive intervention (in frequency and intensity of counselling and treatment) for life-style changes, i.e. stopping smoking, low-calorie diet in case of overweight or obesity, and physical exercise. The follow-up of the intervention group will be every 2 months. The control group will follow customary treatments. MEASUREMENTS: Levels of plasma fibrinogen. In addition, other relevant events will be recorded over a 2-year monitoring period: modification of risk factors, changes in quality of life, cardiovascular events or death. DISCUSSION: The introduction of an intensive primary prevention intervention (life-style changes) in patients with hyperfibrinogenaemia could be a more effective measure than the habitual intervention for reducing plasma fibrinogen figures. In addition, these measures could be translated into a reduction of cardiovascular risk and an improvement in the patient s quality of life.
Adult↗
Kuopio Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (KAPS). A population-based primary preventive trial of the effect of LDL lowering on atherosclerotic progression in carotid and femoral arteries.
BACKGROUND: The atherosclerotic progression-reducing effect of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering has been established in subjects with severe atherosclerotic disease but not in persons with elevated LDL cholesterols without severe atherosclerosis. KAPS (Kuopio Atherosclerosis Prevention Study) is the first population-based trial in the primary prevention of carotid and femoral atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The eligibility requirements were serum LDL-C > or = 4.0 mmol/L and total cholesterol < 7.5 mmol/L. Out of a geographically defined population, 447 men aged 44 to 65 years (mean, 57) were randomized to pravastatin (40 mg/d) or placebo for 3 years. Less than 10% of the subjects had prior myocardial infarction. Thirty-nine men discontinued study medication; however, efficacy data were available for 424 men. The primary outcome was the rate of carotid atherosclerotic progression, measured as the linear slope over annual ultrasound examinations in the average of the maximum carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) of the far wall of up to four arterial segments (the right and left distal common carotid artery and the right and left carotid bulb). For the carotid arteries, at the overall mean baseline IMT of 1.66 mm, the rate of progression of carotid atherosclerosis was 45% (95% CI, 16 to 69%) less in the pravastatin (0.017 mm/y) than the placebo (0.031 mm/y) group (P = .005). In the common carotid artery there was a treatment effect of 66% (95% CI, 30 to 95%; pravastatin 0.010 mm/y; placebo 0.029 mm/y; P < .002) at the overall mean baseline IMT of 1.35 mm. A treatment effect of 30% (95% CI, -1% to 54%) was found for the carotid bulb (pravastatin, 0.028; placebo, 0.040; P = .056) at the overall mean baseline IMT of 2.0 mm. The treatment effect was larger in subjects with higher baseline IMT values, in smokers and in those with low plasma vitamin E levels. There was no significant treatment effect on atherosclerotic progression in the femoral arteries. CONCLUSIONS: These data establish the antiatherogenic effect of LDL-C lowering by pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic men in a primary prevention setting and suggest a greater effect in smokers than in nonsmokers.
Anticholesteremic Agents↗
Preventing heart disease and cancer. What randomized, primary-prevention studies show.
Several chemical agents appear to be useful in primary prevention of CAD and cancer. Randomized trials have found that in specific patient subgroups, tamoxifen and raloxifene decreased the occurrence of breast cancer, and lovastatin and aspirin decreased the frequency of CAD events. Secondary analysis of randomized primary-prevention studies has supported the use of vitamin E and selenium in cancer prevention.
Aged↗
ADCS Prevention Instrument Project: behavioral measures in primary prevention trials.
BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for the development of inexpensive, reliable, and valid instruments that can be used in large-scale primary prevention trials of compounds aimed at ameliorating progression from normal aging to mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study launched a Prevention Instrument Project to develop such methodologies. Behavioral changes are common in diseases causing dementia and may occur prior to a point when cognitive changes are sufficiently severe to allow diagnosis of a dementia syndrome. Experimental behavioral measures were included in the protocol to examine this hypothesis. METHODS: Six hundred forty-four individuals with CDR 0 or 0.5 were randomly assigned to receive a brief in-clinic behavioral assessment or telephonic administration of the same assessment. The questions were asked to the individual and their research partner. The Prevention Instrument Project included behavioral measures of depression, anxiety, irritability, and apathy. RESULTS: All measures demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability at 3-month intervals except for the single-item depression screen by the subjects' research partner. Behavioral changes are significantly more common among patients with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores of 0.5 compared with CDR scores of 0. Behavioral alterations including irritability, anxiety, and apathy are more common among ethnic minorities than among the White population. Depression, irritability, anxiety, and apathy are significantly correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral changes are common among those with mild degrees of cognitive compromise (CDR 0.5). Telephonic assessment of behavioral changes is feasible. The predictive value of these alterations for progression to Alzheimer disease or other dementias will be assessed longitudinally.
Activities of Daily Living↗
Social workers in primary prevention: action and ideology in mental health.
Primary prevention and a public health model have been among the distinguishing innovations of the community mental health movement. Social work practice, however, has historically been involved in community intervention and environmental manipulation to offset social and psychological jeopardy. Given a long tradition of commitment to activity and techniques which are now hailed as mental health's "third revolution," this study explores the role of social work in primary prevention. Data are from a survey of three community mental health centers in which professional staff completed the Gottesfeld Critical Issues of Community Mental Health questionnaire, a time-distribution form, and a prevention questionnaire. In addition, all staff working in primary prevention were interviewed in depth. The total sample of this study of mental health professionals was 84. This study points to some interesting contradictions found between social work action and ideology in primary prevention. Also, social workers are compared with other professionals in order to isolate some primary prevention tasks and attitudes that appear unique to each.
Community Mental Health Services↗
[Primary prevention of atherosclerosis].
Primary prevention consists of acts that decrease the level of risk factors in order to avoid the occurrence of atherosclerosis or to limit its consequences. Even incomplete control of risk factors leads to substantial decrease in the overall risk. Such results should encourage individuals and physicians to continue their efforts. First, the absolute risk for an individual should be evaluated on a risk scale. Then, the various factors to be targeted are smoking, hypertension, plasma lipid anomalies, lack of balanced diet, overweight, sedentary life style and diabetes. Compliance to recommended changes in life style varies greatly, which probably explains why the observed benefit is less than expected. Prevention should be an integral part of daily practice, and the motivation of both physicians and individuals must be constantly supported.
Arteriosclerosis↗
Primary prevention research on incontinence in older adults.
Primary prevention research on urinary incontinence in older adults is in its nascent phase. Most clinical research has focused on secondary or tertiary prevention, that is, testing interventions to cure, improve, or manage incontinence. When urinary incontinence is recognized as a public health issue, resources become available to reduce the risk of incontinence and prevent its occurrence. Methodological issues that face nurse researchers desiring to conduct primary prevention research include inadequate theory and outcome development, need for gender and culturally sensitive measurement instruments, and sampling and design issues. Rather than viewing primary prevention as a futile endeavor, nurse researchers must combine the roles of researcher and advocate, articulating the vision for primary prevention, and developing sound clinical studies to prevent urinary incontinence in the older adult population.
Aged↗
Exploring the possibility of sexual-behavioural primary prevention interventions for cervical cancer.
Consistent causal and risk factors for cervical cancer indicate that primary prevention may be beneficial for cervical cancer prevention. However, social or behavioural primary prevention strategies are seldom discussed in the prevention literature. This paper uses thematic analyses of interviews with key informants involved with cervical cancer prevention policy development in New Zealand to explore the possibility of sexual-behavioural primary prevention. While many informants perceived primary prevention to be important, others were cautiously accepting or opposed to it. Many concerns were raised that highlighting a preventable (sexually transmitted) causal factor might lead to blame and stigma around cervical cancer and reduce participation in cervical screening. Much of the support for primary prevention depended on it being conducted (indirectly) in the context of young people's sexual health education. Positions on primary prevention appeared to be informed by common presumptions about what happens in the 'real world' and the commonality of human papilloma virus in the general population. We contend that the possible health benefits from sexual-behavioural strategies for cervical cancer primary prevention need further exploration.
Attitude to Health↗
An overview of the 4 randomized trials of aspirin therapy in the primary prevention of vascular disease.
BACKGROUND: In the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, in contrast to the recommendations of the American College of Chest Physicians and the American Heart Association, the US Food and Drug Administration recently stated that there was insufficient evidence to judge whether aspirin therapy decreases the risk of a first myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVE: To perform an overview of the 4 primary prevention trials of aspirin therapy to obtain the most reliable estimates of the effects of aspirin therapy on various vascular disease end points. METHODS AND RESULTS: These 4 trials included more than 51,000 subjects and 2284 important vascular events. Those assigned to aspirin therapy experienced significant reductions of 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21%-41%) for nonfatal myocardial infarction and 13% (95% CI, 5%-19%) for any important vascular event. There were possible small but nonsignificant increases in risks of vascular disease-related death (1%; 95% CI, -12% to 16%) and nonfatal stroke (8%; 95% CI, -12% to 33%). When strokes were subdivided by type, there was no significant effect of aspirin therapy on the risk of ischemic stroke, but, while based on small numbers, there was a 1.7-fold apparent increase (95% CI, 6%-269%) in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, which did achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: For the primary prevention of vascular disease, aspirin therapy confers significant beneficial effects on first myocardial infarction and, as a result, on any important vascular event; these effects are clinically important. Whether there is any reduction in vascular disease-related death or stroke associated with treatment remains unclear because of inadequate numbers of events in the primary prevention trials completed to date. More data on hemorrhagic stroke are also needed. In addition, randomized trial data, especially in women but also in men, are needed to help to formulate a rational public health policy for individuals at usual risk. Meanwhile, these data provide evidence for a significant benefit of aspirin therapy in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction.
Adult↗
[Basic principles of evaluation of neural tube defects primary prevention programme].
Neural Tube Defects (NTD) Primary Prevention Programme has been developed in Poland since 1997. The Programme directed by Professor Z. J. Brzezinski is based on an information and education campaign directed at health professionals, women in childbearing age and high school students. The Central Programme Office has been directing the development and implementation of the Programme through a network of provincial programmes. In the present paper the main principles of NTD primary prevention were presented as well as some principles of Programme building and evaluation. Due to the relatively short period of Programme implementation, it is too early to perform the full evaluation. However, some examples were presented including process evaluation and testing the main tools (questionnaires, school programme project). It was assumed that the effectiveness of NTD Primary Prevention Programme in Poland will be assessed by: 1) changes in women's knowledge, attitude and behaviour concerning folic acid supplementation, 2) changes in NTD mortality and morbidity rates, 3) changes in the amount of sold tablets containing 0.4 mg of folic acid. For each of these indicators some international results and Polish baseline results were discussed.
Adolescent↗
Primary prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by lifestyle intervention: implications for health policy.
More than 18 million Americans currently have diabetes mellitus. The economic and human cost of the disease is devastating. In the United States, diabetes is the most common cause of blindness among working-age adults, the most common cause of nontraumatic amputations and end-stage renal disease, and the sixth most common cause of death. For the cohort of Americans born in 2000, the estimated lifetime risk for diabetes is more than 1 in 3. In the next 50 years, the number of diagnosed cases of diabetes is predicted to increase by 165% in the United States, with the largest relative increases seen among African Americans, American Indians, Alaska Natives, Asian and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic/Latino persons. Compelling scientific evidence indicates that lifestyle change prevents or delays the occurrence of type 2 diabetes in high-risk groups. This body of evidence from randomized, controlled trials conducted in 3 countries has definitively established that maintenance of modest weight loss through diet and physical activity reduces the incidence of type 2 diabetes in high-risk persons by about 40% to 60% over 3 to 4 years. The number of persons at high risk for type 2 diabetes is similar to the number of persons who have diabetes. This paper summarizes scientific evidence supporting lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes and discusses major policy challenges to broad implementation of lifestyle intervention in the health system.
Behavior Therapy↗
Smoking, antihypertensive treatment benefit, and comprehensive antihypertensive treatment approach: some thoughts on the results of the International Prospective Primary Prevention Study in Hypertension.
Several major studies investigated the possibility of a primary preventive effect of beta-blockers. The International Prospective Primary Prevention Study in Hypertension (IPPPSH) compared a beta-blocker-containing vs. a non-beta-blocker-containing antihypertensive regimen in 6,357 moderate-severe hypertensive men and women treated over 3-5 years. Blood pressure (BP) control was comparable with either regimen. beta-Blocker treatment was associated with less hypokalemia, earlier electrocardiogram normalization, and fewer withdrawals for uncontrolled hypertension. In agreement with the Medical Research Council (MRC) trial on mild hypertension and the Heart Attack Primary Prevention in Hypertension (HAPPHY) trial, but at variance with the Primary Prevention Metoprolol in Patients with Hypertension (MAPHY) study, cardiac event rates were similar in beta-blocker- and non-beta-blocker-treated patients. With either regimen, in-study BP reduction was associated with a lower rate of stroke as well as of cardiac events. In a subgroup analysis, nonsmokers appeared to derive beta-blocker benefit, the results being similar to those of the MRC. Smokers required higher doses of drugs to achieve diastolic target pressure, had a higher heart rate and hematocrit, and a higher cardiac event rate than nonsmokers at any given level of diastolic pressure. Except for the MAPHY trial, these primary prevention studies do not support the concept of a cardiac primary preventive effect of antihypertensive beta-blockade but stress the importance of good BP control and a comprehensive risk factor prevention approach in the management of hypertensive patients.
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
Primary prevention studies and the healthy elderly: evaluating barriers to recruitment.
Although primary prevention studies are important tools in helping the healthy elderly stay healthy, recruiting from a community-based cohort of healthy elderly individuals for a primary prevention study involves numerous barriers. To better identify and understand these barriers, we conducted and evaluated a comprehensive recruitment strategy for a primary prevention study testing aspirin in an HMO population. In the recruitment phase, we identified healthy individuals (65 years of age or older) who were members of a large, group-model HMO in Oregon and Washington, and used computerized medical database screening, statistical sampling, health plan mailings, e-mail communication with primary care providers, and the experience of a well-established research clinic in an effort to enroll health elderly in this primary prevention trial. Among a random sample of 47,453 eligible patients over the age of 65, 44% responded to recruitment efforts, but only 3% were enrolled--an overall yield of slightly less than 2%. To evaluate these results, we then conducted focus groups with 225 randomly selected "eligible refusers." We determined that healthy elders were hesitant to give up their choice to use aspirin, unwilling to travel to the research center, and reluctant to risk their tenuous hold on good health to participate in a study of primary prevention. Awareness of these attitudes is an indispensable step toward designing effective recruitment strategies for primary prevention studies involving the healthy elderly.
Aged↗
Explaining the de-prioritization of primary prevention: physicians' perceptions of their role in the delivery of primary care.
BACKGROUND: While physicians are key to primary preventive care, their delivery rate is sub-optimal. Assessment of physician beliefs is integral to understanding current behavior and the conceptualization of strategies to increase delivery. METHODS: A focus group with regional primary care physician (PCP) Opinion Leaders was conducted as a formative step towards regional assessment of attitudes and barriers regarding preventive care delivery in primary care. Following the PRECEDE-PROCEED model, the focus group aim was to identify conceptual themes that characterize PCP beliefs and practices regarding preventive care. Seven male and five female PCPs (family medicine, internal medicine) participated in the audiotaped discussion of their perceptions and behaviors in delivery of primary preventive care. The transcribed audiotape was qualitatively analyzed using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: The PCPs' own perceived role in daily practice was a significant barrier to primary preventive care. The prevailing PCP model was the "one-stop-shop" physician who could provide anything from primary to tertiary care, but whose provision was dominated by the delivery of immediate diagnoses and treatments, namely secondary care. CONCLUSIONS: The secondary-tertiary prevention PCP model sustained the expectation of immediacy of corrective action, cure, and satisfaction sought by patients and physicians alike, and, thereby, de-prioritized primary prevention in practice. Multiple barriers beyond the immediate control of PCP must be surmounted for the full integration of primary prevention in primary care practice. However, independent of other barriers, physician cognitive value of primary prevention in practice, a base mediator of physician behavior, will need to be increased to frame the likelihood of such integration.
Adult↗