Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pindolol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Pindolol augmentation in depressed patients resistant to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies of pindolol augmentation of antidepressants in major depressive disorder have produced mixed results, and data in treatment-resistant patients are limited. Here, we report on a double-blind, randomized, controlled 6-week study of pindolol augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in depressed outpatients resistant to SSRI monotherapy. METHOD: Forty-two outpatients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder who had an insufficient response to an adequate trial of an SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline) were randomly assigned to pindolol, 2.5 mg t.i.d., or sham augmentation, in addition to continued SSRI administration. For separate analysis, the control group underwent a single-blinded switch to pindolol, 2.5 mg t.i.d., from week 4 through week 6, while the active group was continued on pindolol augmentation (hemi-crossover design). Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score from baseline to the end of week 3 was the primary outcome measure. Data were gathered from February 1994 to August 1998. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients completed at least 1 week on protocol, with 21 and 17 randomly assigned to the pindolol and control groups, respectively. After 3 weeks on protocol, partial response rates (i.e., minimum 50% decrease from baseline in HAM-D score and maximum absolute score of 15) for the pindolol (19% [4/21]) and control (24% [4/17]) groups were comparable. At 3 weeks, the pindolol and control groups demonstrated mean +/- SD decreases in HAM-D scores of 6.5 +/- 9.8 and 9.7 +/- 7.2, respectively. There were no significant differences in antidepressant response or side effects between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: These results do not support the efficacy of pindolol in augmenting clinical response to SSRIs in treatment-resistant depressed patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Pindolol suppresses serotonergic neuronal activity and does not block the inhibition of serotonergic neurons produced by 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin in awake cats.

Clinical studies have shown that pindolol can enhance the effects of antidepressant drugs, presumably by acting as an antagonist at somatodendritic 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) autoreceptors, which regulate the firing rate of central serotonergic neurons. The current study characterized the action of pindolol on the single-unit activity of serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus of freely moving cats. (+/-)-Pindolol produced a dose-dependent inhibition of neuronal activity after i.v. (ED(50) = 0.25 mg/kg) and s.c. (ED(50) = 1.23 mg/kg) administration. The active enantiomer (-)-pindolol (1 mg/kg i.v.) also suppressed neuronal activity (maximal decrease, 88%). Upon p.o. administration, (+/-)-pindolol (10 mg/kg) produced a marked, long-acting suppression of neuronal activity similar to that observed after s.c. administration. In all cases, the reduction in firing rate produced by pindolol was completely reversed by low doses of N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cycloh exanecarboxamide (WAY-100635) (0.1 mg/kg i.v. or 0.2 mg/kg s.c.), a selective 5-HT(1A) antagonist. Systemic administration of (-)-tertatolol (1-5 mg/kg i.v.), another beta-adrenoceptor blocker/putative 5-HT(1A) antagonist, had no significant effect on neuronal activity. The ability of i.v. (+/-)-pindolol (0.1-1 mg/kg) to reverse the suppression of serotonergic neuronal activity produced by 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (10 microg/kg i.v.), a selective 5-HT(1A) agonist, also was examined. (+/-)-Pindolol had no appreciable effect on the action of 8-OH-DPAT. In contrast, the 5-HT(1A) antagonist drugs WAY-100635 (0.1 mg/kg i.v. ), 4-fluoro-N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl benzamide (0.1 mg/kg, i.v.), N-tert-butyl-3-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-phenylprop anamid e [(S)-WAY-100135] (0.5 mg/kg i.v.), and (-)-tertatolol (1-5 mg/kg i. v.) reversed the effect of 8-OH-DPAT to varying degrees. Overall, these results indicate that pindolol acts as an agonist rather than an antagonist at 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors in awake animals.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

Reduction of cardiac hypertrophy in renal hypertensive rabbits with pindolol.

Arterial pressure, cardiac mass and coronary flow reserves were measured in untreated and chronically pindolol-treated rabbits, prepared as either one-kidney one clip (1K1C) hypertensive or uninephrectomized (sham) controls. Pindolol (200 micrograms/kg/day) was administered for either 23 or 30 days, beginning 1 week after, or the day of initial surgery, respectively. Coronary flow was measured, at day 30, using radioactive microspheres, during base-line and adenosine infusion (0.4 mg/kg/min) in anesthetized open-chest preparations. Heart weight of untreated 1K1C animals (9.13 +/- 0.73 g) was significantly greater than the controls (7.19 +/- 0.77 g). Myocardial mass of 1K1C (9.93 +/- 0.86 g) and sham controls (7.40 +/- 0.31 g) were unaffected by chronic pindolol for 23 days. Cardiac hypertrophy was prevented in 1K1C animals treated with pindolol for 30 days (7.53 +/- 1.28 g). Untreated 1K1C animals were hypertensive compared to sham controls (116 +/- 12 and 78 +/- 7 mm Hg) and neither pindolol regime affected blood pressure. Bradycardia was evident in all pindolol-treated animals. Base-line coronary flow was higher in the untreated 1K1C animals compared to untreated controls (228 +/- 43 vs. 182 +/- 31 ml/min/100 g). After chronic pindolol treatments, 1K1C base-line blood flows were reduced (158 +/- 48 and 175 +/- 59 ml/min/100 g, for 23- and 30-day protocols). Adenosine vasodilated flows were not different between the untreated 1K1C and sham animals and were not affected by pindolol treatment. Therefore, hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy were dissociable in this model when pindolol was administered from the onset of hypertension. This suggests immediate involvement of beta adrenergic activation in the development of hypertrophy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Comparative analysis of beta-1 adrenoceptor agonist and antagonist potency and selectivity of cicloprolol, xamoterol and pindolol.

The partial beta adrenoceptor agonist properties of cicloprolol, xamoterol and pindolol have been compared in vivo (anesthetized catecholamine-depleted or pithed rats) and in vitro (guinea pig or rat right atria and guinea pig tracheal muscle preparations) conditions. All three compounds increased heart rate in the former preparations, and their intrinsic activities relative to isoproterenol were 0.7, 0.65 and 0.45, respectively. The positive chronotropic effects of cicloprolol or xamoterol were competitively antagonized by betaxolol or propranolol; however, part of those induced by pindolol were resistant to these beta adrenoceptor antagonists. None of these compounds increased the spontaneous beating rate of isolated guinea pig atria; however, xamoterol only increased heart rate in isolated rat atria, and its intrinsic activity with respect to isoproterenol was 0.4. Pindolol, xamoterol and cicloprolol behaved as competitive beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonists against isoproterenol-induced tachycardia in a pithed rat model. In order to mimic the intrinsic effects of the partial agonist drugs, control dose-response curves for isoproterenol were determined in pithed rats in which the base-line heart rate was elevated by thoracic spinal cord stimulation. In this in vivo preparation, xamoterol and pindolol were more potent beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonists than cicloprolol; however, cicloprolol and xamoterol, in contrast to pindolol, were selective for beta-1 adrenoceptors. In isolated spontaneously beating guinea pig right atria, cicloprolol and xamoterol were equipotent beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonists but were about 50 times less potent than pindolol. In isolated rat atria, the beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonist potency of xamoterol was greater (pA2 = 8.7) than in guinea pig atria (pA2 = 7.8). The potencies of cicloprolol and pindolol did not vary between these species. In catecholamine-depleted rats, high i.v. doses of cicloprolol had vasodilator activity that was partly mediated by beta-2 adrenoceptors. In carbachol-contracted guinea pig trachea, cicloprolol and xamoterol, in contrast to pindolol, were relatively inactive against isoproterenol-induced relaxation. In conclusion, cicloprolol and xamoterol, similarly to pindolol, behave as agonists and antagonists of beta-1 adrenoceptors. However, only cicloprolol and xamoterol show an elevated degree of selectivity toward the beta-1 adrenoceptor subtype.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

[Acute tolerance to the hypotensive effect of pindolol in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR)].

The development and mechanism of acute tolerance to hypotension produced by pindolol in conscious SHR were examined. At a daily dose of 3 mg/kg, i.p., the hypotensive effect of pindolol (50 +/- 4 mmHg) on the first day was attenuated to 12 +/- 2 mmHg on the fourth day. The development of this acute tolerance was not reduced by combined administration with captopril or trichlormethiazide. The hypotensive effect of pindolol was not reduced by repeated administration of isoproterenol. Thus, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, fluid retention and beta-adrenoceptor subsensitivity seemed to be ruled out from the mechanism of this acute tolerance to pindolol. SHR tolerant to pindolol displayed marked hypotensive effects to prazosin, clonidine, hydralazine, nifedipine and captopril, which were similar to those in saline-treated SHR. However, the depressor response to isoproterenol was markedly reduced in SHR tolerant to pindolol. The correlation between the hypotensive responses to isoproterenol (X) and pindolol (Y) in these SHR could be expressed by: Y = 1.00 X + 0.56, gamma = 0.837 (P less than 0.001). Therefore, acute tolerance to pindolol seemed to be mainly due to "autoblockade" by the remaining pindolol in the body.

Acetylcholine↗

A pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic comparison of pindolol 20 mg retard and a conventional tablet.

In 10 healthy volunteers the time course of cardiac beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity, plasma levels and cumulative urinary excretion of pindolol were compared during a 4-day course of pindolol 5 mg (Visken) t. d. s., and one tablet of pindolol 20 mg retard (Visken retard) once a day. After oral administration of the 20 mg retard tablet, plasma concentrations of pindolol higher than half the maximum value (1/2 Cp (tmax)) were maintained about 2.5 times as long as after administration of the conventional 5 mg tablet. This is evidence for an important and marked retardation of drug release. During treatment with pindolol 20 mg retard once daily, cardiac beta-adrenoceptor blockade, measured by the reduction in exercise-induced tachycardia and in the exercise-induced rise in systolic blood pressure, at almost all times throughout the 24 h period was at least as great as during treatment with pindolol 5 mg t. d. s. This suggests that patients successfully treated with pindolol 5 mg t. d. s. can be maintained with the same beta-adrenoceptor blockade by a single tablet of pindolol 20 mg retard once daily.

Administration, Oral↗

Effects on sleep architecture of pindolol, paroxetine and their combination in healthy volunteers.

RATIONALE: The combination of pindolol with a serotonergic antidepressant has been used to speed up the antidepressant response and to augment in cases of resistant depression. Animal studies have suggested that this increased response occurs because of 5HT(1A) antagonist properties of pindolol, which in combination with a serotonergic antidepressant produces a synergistic increase in 5HT in the synapse. OBJECTIVES: To test whether the combination of pindolol with a serotonergic antidepressant produces a synergistic increase in synaptic 5HT by examining the effects on measures of sleep, psychomotor performance and ratings of anxiety. METHODS: Twelve healthy male volunteers took part in randomised crossover study in which they received paroxetine 20 mg/day (or its placebo) for 9 days with a washout period of 5 days between. On day 7 and 9 of each treatment they also received pindolol 2.5 mg (or its placebo) three times a day. Sleep EEG recordings were made on each of the nights on pindolol (or its placebo) and ratings of saccadic eye movement parameters, subjective sleep, anxiety and other adverse events recorded on the following days. Four drug conditions were therefore tested: placebo, pindolol alone, paroxetine alone and paroxetine+pindolol. RESULTS. The combination of paroxetine+pindolol produced an increase in REM suppression and a reduction in SWS compared with other drug combinations. There were no significant effects on the other measures of 5HT function recorded in this study. CONCLUSIONS: REM suppression by the combination was approximately equal to the sum of REM suppression by each drug individually and thus does not show a synergistic effect. However, there was a significant reduction in SWS produced by only the combination treatment, which may suggest a specific effect of the combination on non-REM sleep mechanisms.

Adult↗

Partial 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties of (-)pindolol in combination with citalopram on serotonergic dorsal raphe cell firing in vivo.

RATIONALE: Pindolol has been reported to shorten the onset of antidepressant action of selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as well as to increase their efficacy. It has been postulated that pindolol enhances the antidepressant effect of SSRIs by blocking somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors, thus antagonizing the SSRI-induced feedback inhibition of midbrain 5-HT cell firing. A recent study, however, found that pindolol suppresses the firing rate of central 5-HT cells, suggesting that the compound possesses agonistic activity at 5-HT1A autoreceptors. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to investigate if acute administration of (-)pindolol antagonizes the decrease in firing rate of dorsal raphe 5-HT cells produced by acute treatment with the SSRI citalopram. METHODS: Extracellular recordings of single 5-HT neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus in anaesthetized rats. RESULTS: Administration of 0.25 or 3.0 mg/kg (IV) (-)pindolol alone decreased the firing rate of a majority of the 5-HT cells studied, an effect that was reversed by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 (0.1 mg/kg, IV). Neither 0.25 nor 3.0 mg/kg (-)pindolol reversed the citalopram (0.1-0.2 mg/kg. IV)-induced suppression of 5-HT cell activity, but produced a further decrease in firing rate. In contrast, WAY100635 (0.1 mg/kg) completely reversed this effect of citalopram. Yet, pretreatment with 3.0, but not 0.25 mg/kg (-)pindolol significantly attenuated the acute inhibitory effect of citalopram on serotonergic cell firing. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings support the previous notion that (-)pindolol possesses prominent agonistic activity at somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors, but also indicate that it may possess a weak antagonistic action at these receptors.

Animals↗

Clinical pharmacology of pindolol.

Beta-adrenoceptor blockade is responsible for the therapeutic action of beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris. Many aspects of their effects can therefore be studied in relatively simple clinical pharmacologic experiments. Cardiac beta-adrenoceptor blockade can be measured in terms of the reduction of isoprenaline-induced and exercise-induced tachycardia. Based on these experimental procedures pindolol is, on a weight-for-weight basis, about 20 times more potent than propranolol. The duration of action of pindolol, measured by the reduction in exercise-induced tachycardia, is longer than that of many other beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs such as propranolol, alprenolol, and slow-release oxprenolol tested at equipotent beta-adrenoceptor-blocking doses. Pindolol is a beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drug with partial agonist activity (intrinsic sympathomimetic activity [ISA]). Drugs of this type are as effective in inhibiting beta-adrenoceptor stimulation as drugs devoid of this property, but unlike the latter they produce some stimulation of beta adrenoceptors. The ISA of pindolol is sufficient to counterbalance the diminution in resting sympathetic tone that results from beta-adrenoceptor blockade. In hemodynamic studies pindolol does not alter or only slightly reduces normal cardiac output. This is in contrast to drugs lacking ISA, which consistently depress cardiac output. In addition, propranolol has been shown to markedly reduce blood flow in the calf, whereas pindolol and placebo do not differ from one another in their effect on this parameter. A linear correlation exists between the logarithm of plasma concentrations of pindolol and cardiac beta-adrenoceptor blockade expressed as a reduction of exercise-induced tachycardia. The high systemic availability of pindolol after oral administration, due to good oral absorption and low first-pass effect, is revealed not only in pharmacokinetic studies but also in pharmacodynamic experiments; beta-adrenoceptor blockade 75 minutes after intravenous administration was equivalent to that observed 2 hours after the same doses given orally.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Pindolol: effects on blood pressure and plasma renin activity.

The influence of pindolol, other antihypertensive agents, or placebo upon plasma renin activity (PRA) was examined in five separate studies involving 249 subjects (pindolol), n = 149; propranolol, n = 43; methyldopa, n = 13; chlorthalidone, n = 16; placebo, n = 28). In addition, the subjects were stratified in for studies into low (n = 104), medium (n = 96), or high (n = 15) PRA categories according to baseline PRA and sodium excretion measurements. The response to antihypertensive therapy was analyzed in each PRA category. Pindolol and propranolol lowered PRA comparably at equivalent dosages, although this effect was not consistently observed in all studies or at all dosage levels. Methyldopa therapy was not associated with a decline in PRA and chlorthalidone elevated PRA. Pindolol and propranolol lowered both supine and erect diastolic blood pressure (BP) comparably. This effect was similar in subjects categorized as having low or medium PRA. Too few patients were studied with high PRA to derive statistically meaningful data. Pindolol lowered standing systolic BP to a greater extent than did propranolol, especially in the medium PRA category. It was concluded that pindolol, like other beta-adrenergic blockers, lowers PRA, that the effect of pindolol on diastolic BP is independent of the baseline PRA category, and that pindolol is more effective than propranolol in lowering standing systolic BP, at least in the medium PRA category.

Adult↗

Effective termination of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia by single dose oral combination therapy with pindolol and verapamil.

We evaluated the efficacy of single oral dose combining 20 mg pindolol and 120 mg verapamil in termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 12 patients with recurrent symptomatic tachycardia. All had electrically inducible SVT lasting longer than 30 minutes. Patients were administered placebo or crushed pindolol and verapamil on 2 consecutive days after tachycardia was electrically induced and allowed to sustain for 30 minutes. With placebo, SVT lasted 186 +/- 18 minutes (mean +/- SEM); five patients converted spontaneously within 121 to 180 minutes. With pindolol and verapamil, 9 of 12 patients (responders) converted to sinus rhythm within 8 to 74 minutes. The mean duration of SVT in the nine responders was 28 +/- 8 minutes compared with 168 +/- 20 minutes on placebo (p less than 0.001). Before termination, tachycardia rate on pindolol and verapamil slowed significantly from 182 +/- 5 to 164 +/- 7/min (p less than 0.05) compared with no significant change in the rate of SVT on placebo. The mean systolic blood pressure during tachycardia was 97 +/- 5 mm Hg with placebo and 101 +/- 7 mm Hg with pindolol and verapamil. Serum levels of pindolol and verapamil obtained in seven patients at time of spontaneous termination of tachycardia were 66 +/- 13 and 56 +/- 14 ng/ml, respectively. The side effects with pindolol and verapamil included lightheadedness in one patient and symptoms of rapid palpitations in three. A single oral dose of pindolol and verapamil is safe and effective in termination of acute paroxysmal SVT and may be the initial therapy of choice in selected patients.

Adult↗

The sympathomimetic activity of (+/-)-pindolol at beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor sites.

In isolated right atrial and stilboestrol-pretreated uterine preparations from both guinea-pigs and rats, pindolol elicited propranolol-sensitive positive chronotropic and smooth muscle relaxant actions. Although the pD2 values for pindolol (8.4-9.2) and (-)-isoprenaline (ISO, 8.4-8.7) fell within the same range in these preparations, the maximum responses to pindolol were less than 15% of those to the catecholamine. Thus, pindolol did not display any selectivity for agonistic actions at beta 1- or beta 2-adrenoceptors. In uteri taken from progesterone-pretreated rats, the pD2 value for (-)-isoprenaline was 9.5 and that of pindolol 8.5. In these preparations the maximal relaxant effect of pindolol (approximately 50% Emax ISO) was greater than that found in oestrogen-pretreated uteri. Thus, it appears that the maximal response of pindolol in vitro can be related to the pD2 value for (-)-isoprenaline. In anesthetized cats, intravenous pindolol elicited non-beta-adrenoceptor-mediated increases in heart rate and decreases in soleus muscle contractility. The mechanism(s) underlying the latter actions are unknown.

Anesthesia↗

Uterine and fetal hemodynamics and fetal cardiac function after atenolol and pindolol infusion. A randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term effects of intravenously given atenolol and pindolol on utero- and umbilicoplacental vascular impedance, fetal hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients suffering from pregnancy-induced hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 24 women were randomized to receive atenolol or pindolol infusion. By using pulsed color Doppler techniques, uterine, placental arcuate, umbilical fetal middle cerebral and renal arteries were examined before, at the end and 30 min after the end of infusion. Pulsatility indices (PI) were calculated to assess vascular impedance. Fetal myocardial function was evaluated by using pulsed Doppler and M-mode echocardiography. Peak systolic velocities from the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk, and also inner diameters and fractional shortenings of both ventricles were measured. RESULTS: Both drugs significantly decreased maternal blood pressure. Immediately after the infusion, maternal heart rate was significantly decreased in both groups; but the decrease was clearer and lasted longer in the atenolol group. Pindolol caused no changes in utero- or umbilicoplacental vascular impedance, while atenolol increased it in the nonplacental uterine artery. After atenolol infusion, PI in the umbilical artery was higher than after pindolol. Pindolol had no effects on fetal hemodynamics, while atenolol decreased PI value in the fetal renal artery. Peak systolic velocity in the pulmonary trunk was decreased after atenolol. Pindolol did not affect the fetal cardiac function. In subgroups with originally increased utero- or umbilicoplacental vascular impedance, the responses in uterine and umbilical vascular impedance and in fetal hemodynamics and cardiac function after atenolol and pindolol were different compared to whole groups. CONCLUSION: Differently acting antihypertensive agents seem to affect differently uteroplacental vascular impedance. Atenolol may have some direct effects on fetal hemodynamics and cardiac function. According to our results, pindolol seems to be more preferable in the treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension than atenolol.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Once-daily high-dose pindolol for SSRI-refractory depression.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) augmentation with the 5-HT1A antagonist pindolol has met with mixed results. Recent studies using positron emission tomography (PET) suggest that pindolol doses used in these studies were too low to effect 5-HT1A autoreceptor blockade. To test the hypothesis that a single higher dose of pindolol would effectively augment antidepressant responses in SSRI-refractory patients, nine subjects with major depression unresponsive to paroxetine 40 mg/day given for 2 months or more were randomized to AM pindolol 7.5 mg (n=4) or placebo (n=5). Subjects were administered the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale, and the Zung Depression Inventory at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4. Subjects receiving pindolol exhibited significant improvements in all ratings beginning at week 2 which continued through week 4. Aside from transient dizziness and a five-point decrease in systolic/diastolic blood pressure associated with pindolol, no adverse effects were reported. Although results must be verified in a larger sample, these findings support previous studies indicating that pindolol can accelerate antidepressant responses during SSRI therapy. In addition, results reported here suggest that a single high dose of pindolol (7.5 mg) is a more effective augmentation strategy in SSRI-refractory patients compared with the same total dose given at 2.5 mg tid.

Adult↗

5-HT(1A) agonist potential of pindolol: electrophysiologic studies in the dorsal raphe nucleus and hippocampus.

BACKGROUND: The ability of pindolol to block 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors on serotonin-containing neurons in the raphe nuclei is thought to underlie the clinical reports of enhanced efficacy and rate of improvement in depressed patients treated with pindolol/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) combinations. Selectivity for somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors is a crucial requirement, as blockade of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) sites may jeopardize the therapeutic response. Previous investigators have probed the effects of pindolol on serotonergic dorsal raphe cell firing in animal species; here we confirm their findings and extend them to include observations on postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in the hippocampus. METHODS: Extracellular single-unit recordings were made in rats using standard electrophysiologic techniques. Firing rates of serotonin-containing neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus and CA3 hippocampal pyramidal neurons were monitored and the effects of pindolol given alone or in combination with an SSRI (fluoxetine) or a 5-HT(1A) antagonist (WAY-100,635) were determined. RESULTS: Pindolol inhibited the firing rates of serotonergic dorsal raphe neurons in a dose-dependent manner. Recovery to baseline firing rates was gradual, but this inhibition could be acutely reversed by WAY-100,635. A range of pindolol doses failed to block the inhibitory effects of fluoxetine on dorsal raphe cell firing. In the hippocampus, pindolol also inhibited cell firing as a function of dose, although these effects were insensitive to WAY-100,635 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of pindolol to inhibit serotonergic dorsal raphe cell firing is indicative of its agonist potential and is consistent with previous studies. The lack of observable antagonism of the SSRI-induced slowing of raphe unit activity casts doubt on the suitability of this mechanism of action to account for the positive findings in clinical studies utilizing pindolol/SSRI combinations. The 5-HT(1A)-independent inhibition of hippocampal CA3 cell firing by pindolol suggests that this compound invokes multiple pharmacologic actions, all of which need to be assimilated into any proposed mechanism of action.

Animals↗

Modulation of dialysate levels of dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin (5-HT) in the frontal cortex of freely-moving rats by (-)-pindolol alone and in association with 5-HT reuptake inhibitors: comparative roles of beta-adrenergic, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT1B receptors.

(-)-Pindolol, which possesses significant affinity for 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, and beta 1/2-adrenergic receptors (AR)s, dose-dependently increased extracellular levels of dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NAD) versus 5-HT, in dialysates of the frontal cortex (FCX), but not accumbens and striatum, of freely-moving rats. In distinction, the preferential beta 1-AR antagonist, betaxolol, and the preferential beta 2-AR antagonist, ICI118,551, did not increase basal levels of DA, NAD, or 5-HT. Further, they both dose-dependently and markedly blunted the influence of (-)-pindolol upon DA and NAD levels. The selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY100,635, slightly attenuated the (-)-pindolol-induced increase in DA and NAD levels, while the selective 5-HT1B antagonist, SB224,289, was ineffective. These data suggest that (-)-pindolol facilitates frontocortical dopaminergic (and adrenergic) transmission primarily by activation of beta 1/2-ARs and, to a lesser degree, by stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors, whereas 5-HT1B receptors are not involved. (-)-Pindolol potentiated the increase in FCX levels of 5-HT elicited by the 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine and duloxetine, and also enhanced their ability to elevate FCX levels of DA--though not of NAD. In contrast to (-)-pindolol, betaxolol and ICI118,551 did not affect the actions of fluoxetine, whereas both WAY100,635 and SB224,289 potentiated the increase in levels of 5-HT--but not DA or NAD levels--elicited by fluoxetine. In conclusion, (-)-pindolol modulates, both alone and together with 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, dopaminergic, adrenergic, and serotonergic transmission in the FCX via a complex pattern of actions at beta 1/2-ARs, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT1B receptors. These findings have important implications for clinical studies of the influence of (-)-pindolol upon the actions of antidepressant agents.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

An autoradiographic study of the influence of pindolol upon [35S]GTPgammaS binding in rat, guinea pig and human brain.

The 5-HT1A/beta-adrenoceptor ligand (+/-)pindolol has been used in clinical trials to enhance the antidepressant effect of selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The accelerating effect of (+/-)pindolol is thought to derive from its blockade of the SSRI-induced, 5-HT1A autoreceptor-mediated inhibition of serotonergic cell firing and 5-HT release. However, controversial results have been reported in regard to its ability to antagonize the effect of 5-HT at such receptors. In the present study, we have analysed the effect of (+/-)pindolol on receptor-mediated G-protein activation by measuring guanylyl 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]-triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding onto tissue sections from the hippocampus and dorsal raphe nucleus from rat, guinea pig and human brain. In these regions, enriched in 5-HT1A receptors, (+/-)pindolol antagonized the stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding induced by 5-HT in a concentration-dependent manner. We found that in both rat and human brain the calculated pEC50 values were higher in the dorsal raphe nucleus than in hippocampus. This suggests a higher potency of (+/-)pindolol at somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors compared to post-synaptic 5-HT1A sites. In the absence of 5-HT, (+/-)pindolol (up to 10(-3) M) did not modify [35S]GTPgammaS binding, which remained at basal levels, indicating that, in this assay, (+/-)pindolol acts as a neutral antagonist rather than a partial agonist as it has been observed in other experimental models. The present data are relevant for the understanding of the neurobiological basis of pindolol acceleration of the action of SSRI antidepressants.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Measurement of partial agonist activity of pindolol.

The partial agonist activity of pindolol was assessed by examining the action of cumulative doses on the heart rate of resting, standing, and exercising healthy men and by studying the interaction of pindolol with metoprolol, a beta blocker devoid of partial agonist activity. Pindolol did not affect resting or standing heart rates (RHR, SHR) but reduced the heart rate after vigorous exercise by approximately 25%. The flatter dose-response curve of pindolol for exercise heart rate (EHR) has been reported from practolol and oxprenolol, which also exert partial agonist activity. After extremely large doses of pindolol there was no evidence of enhancement of agonist activity on RHR, nor was there any evidence of dominance of agonist activity over antagonist activity on EHR. Metoprolol did not alter RHR but reduced SHR by approximately 20% and EHR by approximately 31%. The effects of pindolol on SHRs and EHRs were not enhanced by metoprolol, even though the drug itself induced greater reductions of both. The reduction of SHR by metoprolol was reversed by pindolol. Pindolol appears to have greater affinity than metoprolol for atrial beta adrenoceptors in man.

Adult↗